• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

University as a fractal University as a fractal organization of knowledge organization of knowledge

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "University as a fractal University as a fractal organization of knowledge organization of knowledge"

Copied!
12
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

University as a fractal University as a fractal organization of knowledge organization of knowledge

Aleksander

Aleksander BinsztokBinsztok (1)(1)and Krzysztof Lejaand Krzysztof Leja (2)(2)

(1) Wroclaw University of Economics, (1) Wroclaw University of Economics,

Department of Information and Knowledge Management Department of Information and Knowledge Management (2) Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Management and E

(2) Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Management and Economics, conomics, Department of Knowledge and Information Management

Department of Knowledge and Information Management

Annual Conference on Higher Education Management and Development Annual Conference on Higher Education Management and Development

in Central, Southern and Eastern Europe in Central, Southern and Eastern Europe Danube University

Danube University KremsKrems, 26, 26--28 November 200628 November 2006

Agenda Agenda

• •

IntroductionIntroduction

• •

Knowledge Knowledge -- based universitybased university

• •

University as a fractal organizationUniversity as a fractal organization

• •

ConclusionConclusion

(2)

Introduction (1) Introduction (1) Lambert & Butler’s report

Lambert & Butler’s report „The future of „The future of European Universities

European Universities renaissance or decay”renaissance or decay”

WEAKNESSES OF EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES WEAKNESSES OF EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES

• •

exodus of young and the most talented exodus of young and the most talented people,

people,

• •

most of European universities pursuing most of European universities pursuing exactly the same objectives,

exactly the same objectives,

• •

unprofessional management.unprofessional management.

Introduction (2) Introduction (2)

Percentage participation by Percentage participation by nation in Nobel Prizes Awarded nation in Nobel Prizes Awarded

0 20 40 60 80 100

1900-1910 1930-1940 1960-1970 1990-2000

Europe USA Other

(3)

What problems What problems should be solved should be solved in HE institutions in HE institutions

Changes in the Changes in the domestic HE system domestic HE system

++

changes within changes within

universities universities

University as a University as a

fractal fractal organization organization of knowledge of knowledge

The question is:

The question is: Proposed answer is:Proposed answer is:

UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY

BLACK BOX BLACK BOX

OROR

OR KNOWLEDGE OR KNOWLEDGE

ORGANIZATION

ORGANIZATION

(4)

Fluid structures

Openness to diversity

Fluidity of roles and responsibilities

Activating creativity

Emphasis on learning Widespread

contacts Flexibility

ANCILLARY LEADERSHIP

Source: Evans, 2003

Model of knowledge organization Model of knowledge organization

Ancillary leadership (1) Ancillary leadership (1)

• •

strong leadership position serving the strong leadership position serving the purposes to academic community

purposes to academic community

• •

coordinating the activity of each particular coordinating the activity of each particular organizational unit of the university

organizational unit of the university

• •

flexible approach to problem solving = flexible approach to problem solving = guarantee a degree of self

guarantee a degree of self--organization organization typical to knowledge based organization typical to knowledge based organization

(5)

Ancillary leadership (2) Ancillary leadership (2)

self

self - - organization organization

• •

the principle ofthe principle of redundancy of functionsredundancy of functions

• •

the principle of necessary diversitythe principle of necessary diversity

• •

the principle of the critical minimum of the principle of the critical minimum of specification

specification

• •

the principle of learning how to learnthe principle of learning how to learn

Source: G. Morgan, Images of organization, 1986

Flexibility Flexibility

• •

the new Polish legislation of HE –the new Polish legislation of HE – 20052005

• •

adaptive-adaptive-inertial model inertial model –– traditional HEtraditional HE

• •

anticipatory flexibility -anticipatory flexibility - knowledge HEknowledge HE

(6)

Fluid structures Fluid structures

• •

complex organizational structurescomplex organizational structures

• •

academic communities tend to be academic communities tend to be diversified

diversified

• •

structures should represent the idea of the structures should represent the idea of the university not just reflect its habits and university not just reflect its habits and tradition

tradition

• •

university organization similar to human university organization similar to human brain

brain

Emphasis on learning Emphasis on learning

•• learning in teams is a key factor in acquiring learning in teams is a key factor in acquiring knowledge

knowledge

•• adverseadverse events and events and negativenegative findings may serve findings may serve as a source of great practical value

as a source of great practical value

•• respect various points of view, irrespectiverespect various points of view, irrespective of of the academic position of their proponents the academic position of their proponents

•• questioningquestioningestablished solutions as „canonical” established solutions as „canonical”

options options

•• double loop learning (Argyrisdouble loop learning (Argyris))

(7)

Fluidity of roles and responsibilities Fluidity of roles and responsibilities

•• university staff –university staff creatively pursuing the truth creatively pursuing the truth rather than merely doing the everyday duties rather than merely doing the everyday duties

•• „individuals must be able to work simultaneously „individuals must be able to work simultaneously in various organizational structures (...) the in various organizational structures (...) the same person who is a boss in her/his

same person who is a boss in her/his

organization may be a partner in an association, organization may be a partner in an association, a minority stakeholder or participant in a joint a minority stakeholder or participant in a joint enterprise, etc.”

enterprise, etc.” – Drucker Drucker

Openness to diversity Openness to diversity

• •

teams composed of specialists in various teams composed of specialists in various fields may be more innovative

fields may be more innovative

• •

diversity must be reinforced by an diversity must be reinforced by an atmosphere that promotes an atmosphere that promotes an unrestrained transfer

unrestrained transfer of thoughtsof thoughts

• •

Russian Literature PhD>MBA graduate(?)Russian Literature PhD>MBA graduate(?) –– „the knowledge of Dostoyevski„the knowledge of Dostoyevski

stimulates curiosity and learning drive”

stimulates curiosity and learning drive”

(8)

Fractal university (1) Fractal university (1)

•• functions on the basis of selffunctions on the basis of self--organizedorganized, , autonomous group (research and didactic) autonomous group (research and didactic)

•• forms a selfsameforms a selfsame organizational structure based organizational structure based on „inheriting aims”

on „inheriting aims” – base on principles of good base on principles of good practice

practice

•• allows continuous change of organizational allows continuous change of organizational structures as a result of implementing the structures as a result of implementing the principle of

principle of selfself--optimisationoptimisation of work resources of work resources and processes

and processes

Fractal university (2) Fractal university (2)

• •

achieves a high level of vitalityachieves a high level of vitality as a result as a result of using flexible forms of work and

of using flexible forms of work and guaranteeing a high level of freedom guaranteeing a high level of freedom

• •

enable all fractal units of the university to enable all fractal units of the university to navigate

navigate towards a common, set direction towards a common, set direction through permanent controlling and

through permanent controlling and steering activities

steering activities

(9)

Fractal university (3) Fractal university (3)

•• on the basis of full access to information and its on the basis of full access to information and its unobstructed, dynamic flow, positively influences unobstructed, dynamic flow, positively influences learning processes, self development and

learning processes, self development and improving its members qualifications improving its members qualifications

•• bestbest functions in a turbulent environment functions in a turbulent environment characterised by fast dynamics of change, characterised by fast dynamics of change, typical of the present EU market

typical of the present EU market

•• obliges its members to apply holistic care and obliges its members to apply holistic care and show responsibility for the work processes show responsibility for the work processes carried out for the benefit of client

carried out for the benefit of client

Research microfratal PF1C1…PF1Cm PFnC1…PFnCm PEX1…PEXn

Didactic microfractal

Research microfratal PF1C1…PF1Cm PFnC1…PFnCm PEX1…PEXn

Didactic microfractal PF1C1…PF1Cm

PFnC1…PFnCm PEX1…PEXn

Macrofraktal (integrator)

Autonomous teams (microfractals)

(10)

Autonomous teams Autonomous teams

the elements which bind and regulate them the elements which bind and regulate them

• •

common goals and interests identified andcommon goals and interests identified and accepted as a direction to follow

accepted as a direction to follow

• •

integration and harmonisation of the integration and harmonisation of the resources

resources aat achieving the share goalt achieving the share goal

• •

common values and norm shared by the common values and norm shared by the members of

members of microfractalmicrofractal

Autonomous teams Autonomous teams

• •

management teams management teams

• •

cross-cross-functional teams functional teams –– formal and formal and informal

informal

• •

support teams –support teams – administrative staffadministrative staff

• •

autonomous work teams –autonomous work teams – workingworking on on research projects

research projects

(11)

Autonomous teams Autonomous teams

why microfractalswhy microfractals??

• •

they are in fact highly autonomousthey are in fact highly autonomous

(freedom of decision making and responsibility being extensive) (freedom of decision making and responsibility being extensive)

• •

transparent and fast information flow and transparent and fast information flow and effective mechanism of sharing knowledge effective mechanism of sharing knowledge as a result of copying good solutions

as a result of copying good solutions

• •

they automatically modify structuresthey automatically modify structures

• •

the principle of complementary mutual the principle of complementary mutual services

services –– support each othersupport each other

COMMITMENT of TRADITIONAL UNIVERSITY STAFF and FRACTAL TEAMS

Shared; if possible – evenly divided amongst all team members

Distributed WORK

EFFORT:

Within the group, minimum control from authorities

External SUPERVISION:

Equal Various

STATUS:

Collective + self-control Individual

CONTROL:

Miscellaneous

Wide spectrum of general knowledge Specialised

SKILLS:

Flexible; often modified in the course of completion

Strictly delineated TASKS:

Changeable Set

ROLES:

FRACTAL TEAMS TRADITIONAL

TEAMS ANALYSED

ISSUE

(12)

Conclusion

Conclusion - - outputs outputs

•• convergence of the concept of knowledge –convergence of the concept of knowledge based and fractal university (self organized based and fractal university (self organized fractals)

fractals)

•• growing need for team autonomygrowing need for team autonomy

•• an increase in the rate and capacity of an increase in the rate and capacity of information channels

information channels

a strong increase to share knowledgea strong increase to share knowledge

•• promoting creating attitudes in universitypromoting creating attitudes in university

•• fractal organizations are more efficient than fractal organizations are more efficient than traditional one

traditional one

Thank you

Thank you

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Rola kuchni regionalnych w kreowaniu lokalnego produktu… 399 Wśród obiektów serwujących dania kuchni regionalnej najwięcej było zlokali- zowanych w województwie śląskim

Na podstawie prze- prowadzonej analizy stwierdzono istotną dodatnią zależność u poszczególnych chorych między stopniem profilaktycznego działania litu na nawroty choroby

Bij een fysische modelopstelling (bijvoorbeeld het Deltagootonderzoek met een zetting op zand) is het verklaarbaar dat eerst een enkel los blok om- hoog wordt gedrukt en dat, als

Możliwość współdzielenia wiedzy wojskowej, bardzo specjalistycznej następuje na różnych odległościach operacyjnych – tak małych, jak rejon działania oddziału (30-60 km 2

Elżbieta Jung (Pro-Dean for Research) greets all participants (left to right Professors: A. Trypuz…). Last photograph, after some participants

The company has acquired a specific group of clients (anticipate strategy), and this was associated with creation of trademark, and promotion of individual line

Nawet jeśli korzystanie z mediów społecznościowych i narzędzi analitycznych, z procedur związanych ze stażem pracy i możliwościami awansu, nie jest spójne w ramach jednej lub