Library Management ISSN 0143-5124
©1999 M CB University Press In d ex e d a n d a b str a c te d in: Anbar Management Intelligence Current Awareness Abstracts Information Science Abstracts
Information Management & Technology Abstracts Library & Information Science Abstracts Library literatu re
E d ito r Professor Patricia Layzell Ward Haulfryn, CaeEithin, Minffordd, Penrhyndeu- draeth, Gwynedd, Wales LL48 6EL, E-mail: layzeU- ward@celtic.co.uk. Tel: +44 1766 770434. C o n su ltin g E d ito r Graham Cornish
Copyright Officer: Copyright Office, and Programme Director: IFLA International Programme for UAP, British Library, UK
Internet services available worldwide on URL http://www.mcb.co.uk
MCB University Press
60/62 Toller Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire, England BD8 9BY
Telephone (44) 1274 777700; Fax (44) 1274 785200
I n te rn e t E d ito r s D r Anne Goulding and Ian Murray
Lecturers, Department of Information Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicester shire L E U 3TU, U K Tel: +441509223056. E-mail: agoulding@Jboro. ac. uk
M a n a g in g E d ito r Eileen Breen P r o d u c tio n E x ec u tiv e s Sue Horsfall Cyril Silcox
R egional E d itorial A dviser (N orth A m erica) Chun Wei Choo
Faculty of Library and Information Science, University of Toronto, 140 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario M2L2W2, Canada
R egional E d itorial A dviser (Arab world)
Ahmad A. Bassitt Director, ENSTINET (The Egyptian National S & T Infor mation Network), Academy of Scientific Research and Technolo gy, 101 Kasr el einy st, Cairo, Egypt 11511
Editorial Advisory Board H an n e Albrechtsen
Danmarks Biblioieksskole (Royal School o f Librarianship) Copenhagen, Denmark D r A naba A. Alem na
Department o f Library and Archival Studies, University o f Ghana C hris Bart
Borough Libraries and Museum Officer, Croydon Libraries, M useum and Arts, Croydon, U K P rofessor Peter Brophy
Professor o f Information Management, Department o f Information & Communications, Manchester M e tr o p o lita n U n iv e r s ity , M a n c h e ste r, UK
Alex Byrne
Pro Vice Chancellor (Information Resources), Northern Territory University, D atw in, Australia M aria Luisa Cabral
R ua Luciano Cordeiro 29-1C, 1150 Lisbon, Portugal
Alejandra Ciurlizza M ellon Chief, Documentation Centre, A L ID E (Asociación Latinoamericana de Instituciones Financieras de Desarrol lo), L im a, Peru
D r G . Edw ard Evans University Librarian/Associate Professor, Sociology, Loyola M ary- mount University, USA Professor M argaret Kinnell Evans
Department o f Information Science, Loughborough University, U K
M aria Luisa Arenas Franco Sistema de Bibliotecas, Pontificia Urtiversidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile M r D . K ennington
Director, Capital Planning Information L td, Somerset, U K P rofessor D r R. Kuhlen
Universität Konstanz, Fakultät fü r Verwaltungswissenschaft, Information swissenschaft, Konstanz 1, Germany D r Ia n C. Lovecy
Senior Strategy Advisor, University o f Wales Bangor, Bangor, U K B ob N o rto n
The Institute o f Management, Corby, Northants, U K
D r C ephas Odini
Senior Lecturer, Department o f Library & Information Studies, M o i Universi ty, Kenya
Sandra Parker
Department o f Librarianship and Information Studies, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U K Bendik Rugaas
Minister, The Royal M inistry of National Planning and Co-ordination, Oslo, Norway D r Am os P.N. Thapisa
Senior Lecturer and H ead o f Depart ment, Department o f Library and Information Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana Library Management is one o f the 14 titles published in the field of Library and Information management that support Library Link, a world-wide network that
revolves a rou n d an Internet fo ru m . Its
remit is to b e a valuable free resource to librarians. This includes providing detailed information on current issues within the field of Library and Information manage m ent and putting members in touch with like-minded individuals world-wide. To become a member, access the Library Link internet site at:
http 7/www.mcb.co. uk/liblink/nethome.htm Other tides published by MCB University Press in die field and featured at the Library Link site are:
Asian Libraries, The Bottom Line, Collection Building, Campus-Wide Information Systems, Electronic Resources Review, Interlending & Document Supply, Internet Research, Librarian Career Development, Library Review, Management Bibliographies & Reviews, New Library Wbrld, OCLC Systems & Services, Reference Reviews
Regional offices For North America MCB University Press North America, 875 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 82, Cambridge MA 02139, USA E-mail: help@mcb-usa.com
Telephone: 888 622 0075 (USA and Canada toll-free)
Fax: 617 354 6875 For South East Asia
MCB University Press, 48-2 Jalan Medan Setia Dua, Plaza Damansara, Bukit Damansara, 50490 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Telephone: (60) 3 2523126 Fax: (60) 3 2524097 For Japan
MCB University Press, 256-25 Kounosudai, Nagareyama City, Chiba Prefecture, Japan 270-0102
Telephone: (81)471 54 6245 Fax: (81) 471 54 6268 E-mail: harashi@mtgbiglobe.ne.jp For Brazil
MCB University Press, do Publicacoes Tecnicas, Intemacionais, Rua Piexoto Gomide, 209, 01409-91OSSo Paulo, SP, Brazil Telephone: +55 (11)259 6644 Fax: +55 (11)258 6990
For further information on sample copy requests, missing issue claims, orders and subscription enquiries, please contact your Regional Office or the Customer Help Desk at Bradford (44) 1274 785280. Subscribers in Australia and New Zealand may contact their Regional Manager
R e p rin t s e rv ic e e n q u iries to Sue Thornton,
Bradford
Copyright permissions to Tracy Cogan, Bradford
P rin te d b y Printhaus Graphique. 2 North
Portway Close Round Spinney, Northampton
NN38RQ
No pan of this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmined in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying issued in the UK by The Copyright Licensing Agency and in the USA by The Copyright Clearance Center. No respon sibility is accepted for the accuracy of information contained in the text, illustra tions or advertisements. The opinions expressed in the articles are not necessarily those of the Editor or the publisher.
Library Management
Volume 20, N um ber 3 ,1 9 9 9
This issue is part of a comprehensive multiple access information service comprising:
ISSN 0143-5124
Paper format
| 1 I
Library Management includes eight issues in traditional paper format Please note that two issues of the journal are bound together consecu tively within these covers. The contents of this issue are detailed below.Internet Online Publishing with Archive, Reference Linking, Access to the Wider Literature (multiple Internet updates), Research Register, Multi User Network Licence and E-mail Alerting Service http://www.mcb.co.uk/lm.htm
©
CD-ROM Archivewith Multi User Network Licence
Contents
142 Access to Library M anagem ent online 143 A bstracts & keyw ords
144 F re n c h abstracts 146 G e rm a n abstracts 148 E dito rial
149 Training in team w ork in B ritish university libraries
John H all
159 S elected in d icators o f the range and use o f p rinted resources in Polish academ ic libraries
Miroslaw Gorny, A r tu r J a zd o n and Piotr N ow ak
168 T he in form ation need s o f U nited K ingdom M em b ers o f the European P arliam ent (M EPs)
Rita Marcella, Iona C arcary and Graeme Baxter
179 M atching M P s’ in form ation needs and in form ation services in the H ouse o f C om m ons
Batlang C om m a Serema 190 In te rn e t editorial
196 B ook reviews
Digitizing Historical Pictoral Collections for the Internet
Stephen E. Ostrotu Reviewed by John R. Turner Data Archive: An Investigation into the Digital Preservation N eeds of Universities and Research Funders: T he Future o f Unpublished Research Materials
University o f Essex Reviewed by John R. Turner Comparison o f M ethods and Costs o f Digital Preservation
Tony Hendley
Reviewed by John R Turner T he N ordic Metadata Project Juha Hakala
Reviewed by Philip Hider
Training in teamwork in British university libraries John Hall
Bluck, R. (1994), "Team management and academic libraries: a case study at the University of North umbria", British Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 224-42.
Bluck, R. (1996), Team ManagementLibrary Association Publishing, London.
Goulding, A. (1995), "Student skills for the new European market", in Beaulieu-Hancock, M. (Ed.), Proceed ings of the First British and Nordic Conference on Library and Information Studies,Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen.
Goulding, A. and Kerslake, E. (19%), "Flexible working in UK library and information sen/ices: current practices and concerns", Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 203-16. Green, L. and Clarke, R. (1995), "Professional excellence -
different views", Library Association Record,Vol. 97 No. 3, pp. 161-2.
Hall, J. (19%), "Training in teamwork for students of library and information studies", Education for Information,Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 19-29. Levy, P. and Usherwood, B. (1992), People Skills:
Interpersonal Skills Training for Library and In formation Work,British Library, London (Library and Information Research Report 88).
Lowell, G.R. and Sullivan, M. (1989), "Self management in technical services: the Yale experience", Library Administration and ManagementVol. 3 No. 1, pp. 20-3.
Library Management Volume 20 ■ Number 3 • 1999 - 149-158
Lyon, J. (1995), "Everybody's doing it", Library Manager, No. 8, June, pp. 22-3.
Oldroyd, M. (Ed.) (19%), Staff Development in Academic Libraries: Present Practice and Future Challenges, Library Association Publishing, London. Pinfield, S. (1995), 'Team building and team working in
libraries". Managing Information,Vol. 2 No. 10, pp. 33-5.
Pluse, J. (19%), "What model do you use? An unfashionable approach to team development", Personnel Training and Education,Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 11-12.
Pluse, J. (1997), "Team development using internal material", Information Management ReportMarch, pp. 12-15.
Raschke, S.D (1994), "Team building in a university inter library services department: Part 1 - From mission statement to individual goals", Journal of Inter- library Loan, Document Delivery and Information Supply,Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 33-44.
Raschke, S.D. (1995), "Team building in a university inter library services department Part 2 - Gathering internal data, assessment and adjusting format", Journal of InterLibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Information Supply,Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 101-10. West B. (1995), "Managing for success? That'll be the
Daewoo!", Relay,No. 43, pp. 14-15.
Selected indicators of
the range and use of
printed resources in
Polish academic
libraries
Mirosław Górny
Artur Jazdon and
Piotr Nowak
Mirosław Górny is Senior Lecturer in the Institute of Linguistics (Division of Social Communication) at the Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznari, Poland. Artur Jazdon is Director of the Biblioteka Uniwersytecka (Poznan University Library), Poznari, Poland. Piotr Nowak is Senior Lecturer in the Institute of Linguistics (Division of Social Communication) at the Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Reports the results of a survey rating the amount and degree of the utilisation of printed materials in Polish academic libraries. The results which are presented by type (for example chemical, biological, technical libraries etc.) as well as by function (research libraries and libraries of educational institutions), concern the number of materials, including both books and periodicals. The authors include the amount of material in English as well as in other foreign languages. Figures illustrating the annual increase of these materials are also included. In addition, the article offers data which cover a number of *
issues, including the range of materials which were
ordered at the request of users, the time of cataloguing,
the number of loans, the number of unfilled orders, the extent of the utilisation of the collections, the number of interiibrary loans, as well as the relegation of outdated materials. Finally, the survey reveals information on the number of libraries which research into user needs, the number of libraries which are open on Saturdays and Sundays, and the number of libraries which provide special services such as weekend loans.
Library Management
Volume 20 • Number 3 1999 pp. 159-167 © MCB University Press • ISSN 0143-5124
Introduction
T h e goal o f this research was to e stablish th e a m o u n t o f p rin te d m aterials in P olish academ ic libraries an d th e e x ten t to w hich th ey are u tilised. I t was d ecid ed to c o n d u c t th e research b y m ean s o f a q u estio n n aire a n d to in clu d e all a cadem ic libraries in P o lan d . T h e survey exam ines d ata relev an t to 143 libraries th a t w ere g ath ered b y d istrib u tin g questio n n aires by p o st in 1995. T h e q u estio n n aires w ere sen t to libraries th a t h a d b e en divided in to th re e groups:
(1) u niversity libraries (11 questionnaires w ere d istrib u te d , a n d eight com p leted qu estio n n aires w ere re tu rn e d );
(2) special libraries - libraries o f the in stitutes (e.g. in stitu tes o f c hem istry, o f c o m p u te r science, o f biology etc.) o f th e Polish A cadem y o f Sciences (75 questionnaires w ere d istrib u te d , a n d 43 w ere retu rn e d ); (3) libraries o f in stitu tio n s o f professional
h ig h e r ed u ca tio n - technical universities, m ed ical schools, academ ies o f physical e d u ca tio n , academ ies o f m usic, agricul tu ra l universities, academ ies o f econom ics (57 qu estio n n aires w ere d istrib u te d , and 46 w ere re tu rn e d ).
T h e survey covered research goals n o te d above, an d th e q u e stio n n aire to u c h e d u p o n th e fol low ing areas:
th e state o f library collections in 1994, w ith re sp ec t to P olish, foreign a n d E n g lish language pu b licatio n s a n d Polish, foreign a n d E nglish language periodicals; library acq uisitions d u rin g th e years 1990-1 9 9 4 (divided as above); th e average processing tim e fo r each item (th e average len g th o f tim e from arrival at th e library to th e tim e it becom es avail able to bo rro w ers);
th e n u m b e r o f borrow ers in th e years 19 9 0 -1 9 9 4 (divided in to on-sitc use and take h o m e loans), th e average processing tim e fo r ord ers, a n d the n u m b e r o f ord ers w hich w ere n o t filled, w ere also included; in teriibrary loans fo r th e years 1990-1994 (divided in to loans to o th e r Polish libraries, loans to foreign libraries, loans from o th e r P olish libraries, loans from foreign libraries, percen tag e o f orders filled fo r o th e r libraries a n d by o th e r libraries) a n d also th e average processing tim e for a typical loan;
th e p ercen tag e o f th e library’s collection in p e rm a n e n t u se (estim ated);
p e rc e n t o f a n n u al acquisitions, w hich w ere re q u e ste d b y borrow ers;
th e n u m b e r o f h o u rs a w eek th e library is available for u sers (in clu d in g S aturdays a n d S undays);
• special form s o f loans (24 h o u r loans, w eek en d loans etc.);
rem oval o f o u td a te d m aterials (relega tio n );
• a survey o f u se r n eed s.
T h e resu lts w ere e la b o ra ted in term s o f area and fun ctio n al g ro u p s, th a t is th e y w ere divided into th e follow ing g ro u p s o f libraries:
in d e p e n d e n t libraries o f scientific o r research in stitu tio n s (in clu d in g physics, biology, ch em istry , tech n ical a n d h u m a n ities libraries);
libraries affiliated w ith ed u ca tio n in stitu tions (in clu d in g university, polytechnic, m ed ical, a g ricu ltu ral, ed u catio n al a n d fine arts libraries).
T h e n u m e ric a l results are p re sen te d as arith m etic m ean s a n d it w as u ltim ately decid ed , for practical reaso n s, n o t to p re sen t th e stan d a rd d eviation as a m e a su re o f diffusion. T h e relatively n a rro w e x te n t o f th e d ata, which rarely in c lu d e d m o re th a n te n u n its, is u n d o u b te d ly b e tte r c h aracterised b y giving the extrem e a n d a rith m e tic m e a n values an d m ed ian s, especially fo r re a d ers w ho do n o t use statistics o n a re g u la r basis. T h e d ata w ere p laced in tables. D a sh e s in som e places indicate th a t it w as n o t p ossible to o b ta in th e d a ta in q uestion.
Collections M onographs
T h e resu lts o f th e survey are s h o w n in T a b le I. T h e d a ta c o n ce rn in g th e n u m b e r o f volum es an d also th e e x te n t o f an n u al increases are highly cred ib le, w ith re sp ec t to th e ease w ith w hich they w ere obtained. In only a few cases could it be suspected that only the resources o f th e m a in library w ere given (alth o u g h it was stressed in th e q u e stio n n aire th a t d a ta c on cern in g th e size o f th e collections o f d e p artm e n tal libraries w ere also to be given).
It w as m u c h m o re difficult to d e te rm in e w hat so rt o f role th e c o llections in foreign languages play. In m o st cases th e d ata are estim ated , an d in u n iversity libraries it w as c om pletely im possible to o b ta in th e se data.
In spite o f this, it c a n b e assu m ed th a t the in fo rm atio n o b ta in e d is accurate. E vidence for this is th e fact th a t very sim ilar results w ere
Library Management Volume 20 • Number 3 -1999 • 159-167
o b ta in e d a fter establishing th e share o f the collections in foreign languages in th e an n u al increases. (In th e table th e arith m etic m e a n o f th e an n u al acquisitions fo r th e years 1990-94 is given.) T h e collected d a ta fo rm th e basis, u p o n w hich th e c o m pleteness o f P o lish libraries* collections in relatio n to w orld resources particu larly in term s o f an n u al increases, c an be estim ated . I t is necessary, how ever, to establish b o th th e degree o f d u p licatio n o f resources, in p a rtic u la r in acquisitions, an d th e n u m b e r o f differen t tid e s already in th e collections and b ein g a cq u ired , a n d n o t ju st th e n u m b e r o f volum es. H e re , how ever, th e research er is co n fro n ted w ith ex trem e difficulties, because only a sm all p a rt o f P olish library collections is listed in c o m p u te r catalogues. T h e only o p tio n is a n expensive statistical analysis o f ap p ro p riately selected sam ples o f collections and acquisitions.
Serials
E stim a tin g th e size o f periodical collections tu rn e d o u t to b e th e m o st difficult task in th e entire survey. T o a certain degree this is th e fault o f th e a u th o rs o f th e p re sen t p ap er, w ho did n o t form ulate clearly eno u g h w h e th er individual issues, or titles w ere to b e co u n ted . A lthough titles are m o st im p o rtan t fo r th e overall evaluation o f collections, it s h ould be realised th a t library statistics o p erate o n th e basis of volum es a n d th a t it is easier fo r library p erso n n el to fill o u t th e q u estionnaires b y giving d a ta th a t refers to volum es. In effect, m o st qu estio n n aires p ro v id ed d ata th a t concern volum es. All th e sam e, a certain n u m b e r o f resp o n d en ts d ecid ed to give th e n u m b e r o f tides.
G re a t difficulties w ere c au sed by the evalua tio n o f th e e x te n t o f foreign, especially English language, periodicals in th e collections. In T a b le II, size refers exclusively to volum es. A t tim es, how ever, it w as possible to establish the n u m b e r o f titles. T h e se d a ta are referred to in the text, since they apply to only a few cases and are obtained on th e basis o f a smaller amount o f d a ta th a n th o se w hich refers to volum es.
P o lytechnic libraries have 1,320 periodical titles (the average fo r fo u r libraries) o f w hich 42 p e r c en t are foreign periodicals, 17 p e r c en t o f the titles are in English. A ccording to th e an n u al increase in v olum es, th e a m o u n t o f titles a cq u ired d o es n o t exceed 600. F ro m the c o m parison, it tu rn s o u t th a t fo r one tid e, there are ab o u t th re e volum es p e r year. T h is is no t, how ever, in fo rm atio n o b tain ed o n the basis o f a large e n o u g h sam ple a n d it s h o u ld only be tre a te d as a n e stim ate.
Mirosław Górny, Artur Jazdon and Piotr Nowak Volume 20 • Number 3 •1999 • 159-167 Table I Size and language of collections (monographs) and their annual increase
Type of library Number of libraries Collections in 1994 in volumes (1) average (2) minimum (3) median (4) maximum Collections in 1994-percentage of collections (1) in foreign languages (2) in English Annual increase in the years 1990-94 (1) average (2) minimum (3) median (4) maximum Increase in collections in the years 1990-94 percentage of collection! (1) in foreign languages (2) in English Physics libraries 3 (1) 21,000 (1)88 (1) 140 (1)68 (2) 15,000 (2)88 (2) 12 (2)61
(3) - (data from one library) (3) 141
(4) 26,000 (4) 267 Chemistry libraries 7 (1) 9,500 (1)89 (1) 119 (1)85 (2) 2,500 (2) 80 (2) 67 (2)79 (3) 7,600 (3) 108 (4) 27,400 (4) 219 Humanities libraries 10 (1) 50,000 (1)28 (1) 813 (1)25 (2) 3,000 (2)15 (2) 54 (2)14 (3) 37,000 (3) 715 (4) 145,000 (4) 3,100 Technical libraries 6 (1) 10,000 (1)58 (1) 124 (1)53 (2) 611 (2)48 (2) 84 (2)40 (3) 5,410 (3) 84 (4) 24.400 (4) 165 Biology libraries 17 (1) 17,779 (1)76 (1) 200 (1)64 (2) 403 (2) 72 (2) 31 (2)56 (3) 9,766 (3) 88 (4) 114,489 (4) 1,295 University libraries 9 (1 )'1,043,000 - (1) 14,500 (1)15 (2) 410,000 (2) 4,972 (2) 4 (one library) (3) 796,000 (3) 17,261 (4 );>,530,000 (4) 27,600 Polytechnic libraries 12 (1) 370,000 (1) 25 (1) 6,500 (1)13 (2) 111,000 (2)7 (2) 2,000 (2) 9 (3) 251,000 (3) 4,300 (4) 937,000 (4) 16,200 Agricultural libraries 6 (1) 243,000 (1)30 (1) 3,720 (1)16 (2) 114,000 (2) 20 (2) 1,800 (2)9 (3) 190,000 (3) 2,000 (4) 430,000 (4) 8,000 Fine arts libraries 6 (1) 200,000 (1)30 (1) 317 (1) 23 (2) 14,000 (2) 10 (2) 180 (2)12 (3) 16,000 (3) 270 (4) 28,000 (4) 620 Medical lib r a r ie s 8 (1) 200,000 (1)28 (1) 3,654 (1)26 (2) 56,000 (2)23 (2) 2,000 (2)23 (3) 170,000 (3) 3,300 (4) 326,000 (4) 6,600 Pedagogical libraries 9 (1) 331,000 (1)11 (1) 8,000 (1) 6 (2) 141,000 (2)4 (2) 4,000 (2) 5 (3) 241,000 (3) 7,200 (4) 489,000 (4) '15,000 Physical education 5 (1) 77,000 (1) 16 (1) 2,027 (1)6 libraries (2) 37,000 (2)12 (2) 1,300 (2)5 (3) 85,000 (3) 1,400 (4) 113,000 (4) 2,795
Mirosław Górny, Artur Jazdon and Piotr Nowak Volume 20 • Number 3 ■ 1999 • 159-167
Table II Size and language profile of periodical collections and their annual increase Numbers of
periodicals Annual increase
in volumes of periodicals Type of library Number of libraries investigated in 1994 (1) average (2) minimum (3) median (4) maximum Periodicals in 1994 in volumes (1) in foreign languages (2) in English in the years 1990-94 (1) average (2) minimum (3) median (4) maximum Increase in collections in the years 1990-94 percentage of collections (1) in foreign languages (2) in English Physics 3 (1) 12,000 (1)98 -libraries (2) 5,700 Í3) — (4) 17,700 (data from two libraries)
Chemistry 7 (1) 13,850 (1)93 (1) 214 (1) -libraries (2) 4,189 (2) 83 (2) 89 (2) 82 (3) 9,357 (3) 179 (4) 27,824 (4) 372 Humanities 10 (1) 17,538 - (1) 326 (1) 54 libraries (2) 998 (2) 50 (2) 44 (3) 1,866 (3) 85 (4) 40,000 (4) 1,242 Technical 2 (1) 9,062 (1)64 (1) 179 (1) 63 libraries (2) 552 (3) — (2) 36 (2) 110 Ci) — (2) 35 (4) 17,572 (4) 247 Biology 17 (1) 11,959 (1)86 (1) 345 (1) 80 libraries (2) 57 (2)69 (2) 61 (2) 67 (3) 6,641 (3) 220 (4) 34,130 (4) 925 University 9 (1) 341,892 - (1) 6,807 (1) 33 libraries (2) 70,777 (2) 1,343 (2) -(3) 444,742 (3) 6,135 (4) 100,610 (4) 14,541 Polytechnic 12 (1) 94,349 (1)28 (1) 1,710 (1) 54 libraries (2) 4,729 (2) - (2) 293 (2) 37 (3) 75,222 (3) 1,784 (4) 214,030 (4) 2,599 Agricultural 6 (1) 90,037 (1)44 (1) 1,608 (1) 42 libraries (2) 46,259 (2) 20 (2) 886 (2) 24 (3) 67,000 (3) 1,390 (4) 189,853 (4) 3,155 Fine arts 6 (1) 2,219 - (1) 67 (1) 40 libraries (2) 943 (2) 19 (2) -(3) 1,378 (3) 52 (4) 4,335 (4) 129 Medical 8 (1) 49,810 (1) 59 (1) 650 (1) 61 libraries (2) 11,526 (2)54 (2) 269 (2) 54 (3) 44,510 (3) 495 (4) 81,999 (4) 1,059 Pedagogical 9 (1) 28,525 (1)24 (1) 938 (1) 19 libraries (2) 11,560 (2)12 (2) 405 (2) 9 (3) 24,633 (3) 952 (4) 41,200 (4) 1,728 Physical 5 (1) 14,988 (1)26 (1) 609 (1) 20 education (2) 5,660 (2) 9 (2) 144 (2 )-libraries (3) 17,631 (3) 593 (4) 21,672 (4) 624
Mirosław Górny, Artur Jazdon and Piotr Nowak T h e difference was p ro b ab ly cau sed by th e fact th a t som e libraries gave th e n u m b e r o f titles in th e ir collections, a n d n o t th o se th a t were subscribed to in a given year. A n a tte m p t was m ade to establish w h e th er th e n u m b e r o f collected periodicals in 1994 deviated fro m the arithm etic m ean o f th e n u m b e r o f collected periodicals in the years 1990-94. In th e case o f polytechnic libraries th e resu lt in d icated th a t, in 1 9 9 4 ,2 4 p e r c en t few er volum es o f Polish periodicals w ere o b ta in e d (th ere was an average increase o f te n titles); 21 p e r c en t few er volum es o f foreign periodicals (a b o u t 65 few er titles on average were p u rch ased ) a n d 15 p e r c en t few er English language volum es (on average there was a n increase o f 77 titles).
In m edical school libraries, th e re are, on average, ab o u t 1,517 perio d ical titles (currently ab o u t 2 0 0 -2 5 0 titles are collected; o ne library gave the n u m b e r as 7 3 1 ). In 1994, 22 p e r cen t m ore volum es o f P o lish periodicals th a n the average from the years 1990-94 (an increase o f 81 titles); a 4 p e r c e n t increase in volum es o f foreign periodicals (30 m o re titles); a n d a 16 p er c en t increase in th e n u m b e r o f E nglish language volum es (60 m ore titles).
T h e average university library h a d 2,349 tides (34 p e r c en t foreign a n d 17 p e r c en t in English) and c u rre n d y h as 2,2 7 0 . T h e re was a fall in th e n u m b e r o f volum es a cq u ired o f foreign periodicals o f 7 p e r c en t (a 2 8 p e r c ent increase in tid es), a n d a n increase in the n u m b e r o f volum es o f P o lish periodicals (a 22 p e r c en t fall in th e n u m b e r o f tides).
In college o f e d u catio n libraries, th e n u m b e r o f collected titles is c u rre n tly ab o u t 3 0 0 -3 5 0 (one library indicated th a t it has 431 titles in its collections). T h e re w as a fall in th e n u m b e r o f v o lu m esacq u ired in th ecaseo fP o lish p erio d icals o f 19 p e r cent, o f foreign periodicals 28 p e r cent, and o f English language periodicals 20 p e r cent.
In agricultural college libraries, collections cu rren d y co n tain a b o u t 5 0 0 to 550 periodical tides. T h e re was a decrease in th e n u m b e r o f volum es acq u ired o f 29 p e r c en t in th e case o f Polish periodicals, o f 26 p e r c en t in th e case o f foreign periodicals, a n d o f 39 p e r c en t in the case o f E n glish la n g u a g e p erio d ica ls.
In physical ed u catio n libraries, th e re are cu rren d y a b o u t 2 0 0 to 2 2 0 tid es (tw o libraries gave exact n u m b ers o f 166 a n d 194). T h e re was a decrease o f volum es a cq u ire d o f Polish periodicals o f 26 p e r c e n t a n d o f foreign periodicals o f 16 p e r cent.
Special technical libraries c u rre n d y have o n average ab o u t 60 tides. In th ree libraries d u ring the years 1990-1994, a decrease in th e n u m b e r o f volum es a cq u ired o f 68 p e r c e n t was
Volume 20 ■ Number 3 -1999 159-167
observed: o f 21 P olish tid es a n d 38 foreign tides, a n d o ne E nglish language tide.
Special biology libraries h a d collections o f 100-120 tid es o n average (in th e collection o f an average library th e re w ere issues o f 23 4 tid es). In the years 1 9 90-94, th e n u m b e r o f English language volum es d eclin ed by 4 p e r cent, the n u m b e r o f o th e r foreign language volum es by 5 p e r c e n t w hile th e re w as a 2 p e r c en t increase in Polish periodicals. T h r e e libraries in d icated a decrease in th e n u m b e r o f Polish titles acquired o f 1 p e r cent, o f foreign tid es o f 13 p e r cent, a nd E nglish language tid es o f 18 p e r c en t d u rin g the above m e n tio n e d period.
Special c h em istry libraries h a d an average o f 70 p eriodical tid es in th e ir collections. In the years 1990-94, th e n u m b e r o f volum es in creased by 37 p e r c en t, acco rd in g to d a ta fro m th re e libraries.
H u m an ities libraries h a d o n average b etw een 100 an d 250 tides. In th e years covered b y this investigation, th e n u m b e r o f collected Polish volum es fell b y 19 p e r c en t, E nglish language volum es b y 25 p e r c e n t a n d o th e r foreign language volum es by 2 0 p e r cent. A n increase o f te n tid es fo r P olish periodicals w as n o te d , as w ere a n eig h t-tid e increase o f E nglish language periodicals a n d a d ecrease o f te n tides am ong o th e r foreign language periodicals.
P ercen tage o f collection s b ased upon u ser requests and the degree o f u se o f the library collections
T a b le H I contains d a ta co n cern in g th e share o f collections b ased u p o n u se r req u ests, an evaluation o f th e percen tag e o f collections used, an d also d ata co n cern in g research o n u se r n e ed s.
T h e in fo rm atio n in T a b le EH is com posed o f individual e stim ates given by librarians. T h e results th erefo re are m o re a p ic tu re o f the opinions o f the lib rarian s them selves, th a n the tru e situation. A ll th e sam e, if th e experience o f library p erso n n el is tak en in to co nsideration, it sh ould b e e xpected th a t th e d a ta d o n o t significandy differ fro m the tru e state o f affairs. T h e sm all ran g e o f variatio n o f th e m ean, w hich characterises th e degree to w hich collections are utilised in all libraries, is interesting. P erh ap s this results fro m th e inclin atio n to avoid m arginal evaluations. It s h o u ld b e clarified h e re th a t the co n ce p t “ collections c ontin u ally u tilised ” was n o t exacdy defined. I t w as felt th a t precise n u m eric p aram eters co u ld n o t b e u tilised, and th a t all re sp o n d en ts w o u ld u n d e rsta n d the idea b e h in d th e expression in a sim ilar m an n er.
Book selection (relegation) E x act in fo rm atio n is given in T a b le IV.
Volume 20 ■ Number 3 ■ 1999 ■ 159-167
Research of the needs of
Type of library Number of libraries in study Percent of collections on order for users in
the general increase of collections The use of collections (estimate of librarians)
readers (a) number of libraries, which conduct systematic research (b) number of libraries, which conduct sporadic research libraries Chemistry libraries Humanities libraries Technical libraries Biology libraries University libraries Polytechnic libraries Agricultural libraries Fine arts libraries Medical libraries Pedagogical libraries Physical e duca tion libraries 10 17 (1) 66 (2) 25 (3) 50 (4) 100 (1) 99 (2) 95 (3) 100 (4)100 (1) 53 (2) 1 (3) 70 (4) 100 (1) 82 (2) 40 (3) 90 (4) 100 (1) 71 (2) 3 (3) 80 (4) 90 (1) 32 (2) 1 (3) 20 (4) 90 (1) 65 (2) 15 (3) 75 (4) 95 (1) 41 (2) 5 (3) 30 (4) 80 (1) 43 (2) 20 (3) 35 (4) 70 (1) 40 (2) 23 (3) 34 (4) 60 (1) 22 (2) 5 (3) 25 (4) 50 (1) 21 (2) 10 (3) 15 (4) 40 (1) 59 (2) 30 (3) 60 (4) 80 (1) 52 (2) 10 (3) 40 (4) 80 (1) 53 (2) 20 (3) 60 (4) 80 (1) 45 (2) 35 (3) 40 (4) 60 (1) 52 (2) 5 (3) 50 (4) 100 (1) 34 (2) 12 (3) 35 (4) 50 (1) 48 (2) 30 (3) 60 (4) 80 (1) 46 B ) 39 (3) 40 (4) 60 (1) 60 (2) 25 (3) 40 (4) 80 (1) 55 (2) 19 (3) 60 (4) 70 (1) 45 (2) 30 (3) 45 (4) 60 (1) 60 (2) 50 (3) 60 (4) 75 (a) 1 (b) 1 (a) 3 (b) 3 (a) 3 (b) 7 (a) 2 (b) 6 (a) 3 (b) 6 (b) 3 (a) 1 <b)2 (a) 2 (b) 4 (a) 2 (b) 5 (b) 3
Mirosław Górny, Artur Jazdon and Piotr Nowak Table IV Removal of outdated materials (relegation)
Volume 20 • Number 3 ■1999 • 159-167 Type of library Number of libraries in study Number of libraries conducting material removal Share of material removed as a percentage of total collection (1) average (2) minimum (3) media (4) maximum Share of removed materials in annual turnover Physics 3 none -libraries Chemistry 7 2 - -libraries sporadically Humanities 10 1+6 _ — libraries sporadically Technical 8 1+3 - -libraries sporadically
Biology 17 2+5 (1) 1 one library
libraries sporadically (2) 0.5 indicated 10,
(3) 0.5 one library (4) 2 indicated 110 University 9 6 (1) 0.4 (1) 34 libraries (2) 0.1 (2) 5 (3) 0.2 (3) 10 (4) 1.2 (4) 90 Polytechnic 12 11 (1) 2 (1) 37 libraries (2) 0.02 (2) 1.2 (3) 0.9 (3) 33 (4) 5 (4) 95 Agricultural 6 5+1 (1) 1 (1) 27 libraries sporadically (2) 0.1 (2) 10 (3) 0.3 (3) 20 (4) 3 (4) 63
Fine arts 6 3+1 one library one library
libraries sporadically indicated 0.3 indicated 18
Medical 8 6 (1) 1-2 (1) 67 libraries (2) 0.3 (2) 50 (3) 1 (3) 50 (4) 2 (4) 100 Pedagogical 9 8 (1) 0.7 (1) 28 libraries (2) 0.2 (2) 7 (3) 0.6 (3) 20 (4) 1.5 (4) 55 Physical 5 3 (1) 0.5 (1) 15 education (2) 0.3 (2) 7 libraries (3) 0.3 (3) 10 (4) 0.9 (4) 30 Cataloguing C ataloguing tim e
T h e d ata, are given in T a b le V, is com pletely estim ated.
Circulation
C irculation in the years 1990-94 T h e results are collected in T a b le VI. T h e g reatest d o u b ts are c re ated b y th e figures co n cern in g o n -site fa cilities. In libraries w ith op en stacks, only e stim ated n u m b ers can be
given. T h e results in th e table are p robably low er th a n in reality. I t w o u ld b e difficult to establish w h at p e rc e n t o f requests w ere n o t filled. S o m e libraries gave e stim ated figures, som e gave p recise figures, an d som e did n o t give a ny figures.
F igures dealing w ith services fo r one year are given in th e table, b u t o n the basis o f d ata from five years. D u rin g this p e rio d th e n u m b e r o f users in e d u catio n al libraries increased by a b o u t 50 p e r c e n t (m edical school libraries are an exception). T h is n o tab le increase is related to an increase in th e n u m b e r o f stu d en ts.
Mirosław Górny, Artur Jazdon and Piotr Nowak Table V Cataloguing time
Volume 20 ■Number 3 • 1999 159-167
Average Maximum Minimum
Number of cataloguing cataloguing cataloguing
Type of library libraries in study time time time
Physics libraries 3 2 days 4 days 1 day
Chemistry libraries 7 2 days 7 days 1 day
Humanities libraries 10 15 days 90 days 1 day
Technical libraries 6 1 day 1 day 1 day
Biology libraries 17 6 days 30 days 1 day
University libraries 9 6 months 15 months 2 months
Polytechnic libraries 12 1 month 6 months 3 days
Agricultural libraries 6 1 month 2 months 5 days
Fine arts libraries 6 1 month 6 months 1 day
Medical libraries 8 10 days 1 month 1 day
Pedagogical libraries 9 43 days 4 months 1 month
Physical education libraries 5 7 days 7 days 1 day
Table VI Number of loans in the years 1990-94
Percent of
Number Number of on-site Number of take home requests which
Type of library
of libraries in study
loans (in-library use)
min. max. ave. min.
loans
max. ave.
were not filled min. max. ave.
Physics libraries 3 - - 43,000 (1 lib.) 96 6,450 2,444 - -
-Chemistry libraries 7 400 33,000 9,755 13 10,000 4,000 5 5 5 Humanities libraries 10 452 27,600 7,000 127 11,347 2,500 2 20 9 Technical libraries 6 483 8,000 2,706 563 1,625 1,050 1 10 4 Biology libraries 17 81 22,400 3,942 213 9,600 2,677 7 31 17 University libraries 9 116,000 674,000 357,000 5,000 273,000 125,000 2 28 14 Polytechnic libraries 12 56,000 505,000 219,000 20,000 297,000 99,000 2 46 18 Agricultural libraries 6 16,000 134,000 61,000 17,000 134,000 54,000 2 20 11
Fine arts libraries 6 500 8,000 4,000 2,400 25,000 10,000 3 59 21
Medical libraries 8 13,200 160,000 50,000 9,600 131,000 40,000 2 3 2
Pedagogical libraries 9 23,000 293,000 106,000 21,000 209,000 73,000 4 25 11
Physical education libraries 5 17,000 78,000 37,000 8,000 22,000 14,000 2 16 10
Interlibrary loans
T h e d a ta c o n cern in g th e degree o f req u ests - given in T a b le V II - are m o sd y estim ates. T h e d ata c o n cern in g th e pro cessin g tim e fo r inter- library loans are also p rim arily estim ates. D a ta on th e n u m b e r o f su ch loans in o ne y ear m ade on th e basis o f d a ta fro m five years are also given in th e table.
Types o f services and tim es o f access U n iversity libraries are accessible o n average 64 h o u rs a w eek (m ax im u m 75 h o u rs a n d m ini m u m 49 h o u rs ). O nly o ne library is n o t accessible o n Saturdays. F o u r libraries are also o p en o n S undays, a lth o u g h o ne o f th e m is o pen on S undays only d u rin g e xam perio d s. Six libraries have special services (alth o u g h som e o f
th e m are only sporadically available); th ree libraries d o n o t perfo rm any special services.
Physical e d u catio n libraries are op en to th eir u sers o n average 53 h o u rs (m in im u m 43 ho u rs, m ax im u m 65 h o u rs). O nly o ne is n o t o p en on S atu rd ay s, a n d tw o are o p en o n Sundays. F o u r libraries have special types o f services.
M edical school libraries are o p en an average o f 64 h o u rs a w eek. O n e is o pen o n S unday. Five libraries have special services, tw o have th e m sporadically a n d o ne does n o t have th e m a t all.
Polytechnic libraries are available to u sers o n average 59 ho u rs a week. All are closed on Sundays, a n d n in e are closed o n Saturdays. F o u r have special services, an d fo u r have th e m sporadically.
A gricultural libraries are o p en 56 h o u rs a week. O n e is o pen o n Sundays a n d o ne is o pen
Mirosław Górny, Artur Jazdon and Piotr Nowak Volume 20 • Number 3 • 1999 159-167 Table VII Interlibrary loans
Average Average Average Average Percentage Percentage
number of number of number of number of of requests of requests
Number of loans to loans to loans from loans from filled from filled to Average
Type of libraries other foreign other foreign outsiae outside turnaround
library in study libraries libraries libraries libraries institutions institutions time
Physics libraries 3 595 3 (1 library) 31 - - 70 _
Chemistry libraries 7 130 - 225 7 (1 library) 84 96 Up to 2 week
Humanities libraries 10 263 3 (2 libraries) 70 7 (5 libraries) 92 92
-Technical libraries 6 71 2 (1 library) 217 3 (2 libraries) 91 96 up to 2 week:
Biology libraries 17 534 2 (4 libraries) 165 4 (3 libraries) 74 83
-University libraries 9 1,090 81 (7 libraries) 495 84 (8 libraries) 78 76 4 weeks
Polytechnic libraries 12 841 25 (10 libraries) 756 156 (10 libraries) 77 71 26 days
Agricultural libraries 6 418 3 (5 libraries 666 14 (5 libraries) 70 68 3 weeks
Fine arts libraries 6 48 10 (1 library) 27 2 (4 libraries) 84 84 17 days
Medical libraries 8 1,122 2 (6 libraries) 1,451 60 (6 libraries) 74 76 16 days
Pedagogical libraries 9 49 2 (2 libraries) 241 8 (7 libraries) 64 56 3 weeks
Physical education libraries 5 43 - 143 3 (2 libraries) 88 86 1 month
o n S aturdays. T h re e libraries have special services, tw o sporadically, a n d o ne n o t a t all.
L ibraries in fine arts schools are o p en 37 h o u rs a w eek. All are closed on Sundays an d one is o p en o n S aturdays. F o u r libraries have special services.
Specialised libraries w ere n o t tak en into a cc o u n t h ere, b ecau se th e y have only a few p e rm a n e n t lenders (in g eneral, th e ir collections are n o t available to s tu d e n ts). A n d alth o u g h these libraries usually d o have special services, th ere is usually n o special n e ed for th eir collections to b e available o n S atu rd ay s a n d Sundays.
Conclusion
T h e findings o f this stu d y are b a se d o n survey data g ath ered in 1995. Events a re h ap p en in g quickly. U n d o u b te d ly , the fiscal, technologi cal, an d political e n v iro n m en t in Polish research libraries h as changed since 1995. As far as we know (o u r know ledge is b ased on
c o n tacts w ith librarians) m o st o f th e surveyed in d icato rs seem s to have reach ed a p lateau. L arge increases have b e en re c o rd e d only for services (exclude in terlen d in g ). L ibraries are called u p o n to serve a h ig h er n u m b e r o f s tu d en ts.
P olish libraries n e ed p ro g ram s o f co-opera tio n for m o re efficient u se o f library resources. M o st o f th e libraries h ave joined to g e th e r in a u to m a tio n p rojects, b u t all o f th e m are co n tin u in g to a llocate m aterials b u d g ets in a trad itio n al m a n n er.
Further reading
Dudzińska, E. (1995), "Import of serials at a time of economic change", Polish Libraries Today,Vol. 3, pp. 35-49, 71.
(The) Inventory of Scientific Journals and Other Sources of Scientific Information being Imported into Poland in the Years 1992-98.Http7/wwwtech.netpl7PFUN/ Kaminski, S. (1995), "Contemporary problems of acquisi
tions in Polish university libraries", Polish Libraries Today,Vol. 3, pp. 35-48.