TECHNÍ$CE UVR$p
taboratorjum Voor 197
$cheepshydrome,
Archief
'MOhAgZCD
DeiftAnalyses
on Low' Cycle .esor6r5f5
in Astern Seas
by Masami Harnamoto*, Member
Naoya Umeda**, Member..
-Akihiko Matsuda***,. Member and Wataru Sera***, Student Member
Summary
Low cycle resonance occurs due to the dynamic variation of righting arm with respect to the relâtive
position of ship to waves. The dynamic variation depends on the encounter period of a ship in astern
seas. This paper discusses on the following items. (1) An analyticál expression of GZ curves varying
with respect to the relative position of ship to waves. (2) Non-linear equation of motion describing
low cycle resonance. (3) The effects of righting arm, stability range and encounter period on low
cycle resonance.
1.
Introduction
To investigate the dangerous situations leading up to
capsize in severe astern seas, free running model
experiment1' have been carried Out for a container ship
and a purse seiner at the seakeeping and maneuvering basin of the National Research Institute of Fisheries
Engineering. During these, the low cycle resonance was
observed for the container ship model but was not
observed for the purse seiner modél in scvere astern seas. Details of the experiment will be reported by the subject of separate publications7'.
It might be very
interesting for ship designers and operators to consider
why the difference happened. The problem, here is to
investigate what leads to the low cycle resOnance.
When a ship is traveling, in severe astern seas, the
rolling motionwill be developed to large amplitude or
capsized in a very short time if the natural roll period is
close to a specific encounter period. Such a rolling motion is so called low cycle or parametric resonance
which is a dangerous situation for ships of poor stability satisfying 1MO gesolutions A 167 and A 562 only criti-cally. Although ships are usually designed with consid-eration of safety margin with respect to capsizing under
most conditions, the. combination of severe waves loading condition, ship speed. and heading angle may lead to poor stability;
Analytical approaches to this problem were
origi-nally made by Watanabe1',
Grim2', Kerwj&' and Paulling".. They pointed out that low cycle resonance occurs due to the dynamic variation of righting arm with rEspect to the relative position of ship to waves and the unstable regions of low cycle resonance are specified as the solution of linear differential equationof the so called Mathieu's type. However by solving the linear equation of motion mentioned above, it is
impos-sible to simulate the rolling motion óf large amplitude
leading up to capsizing because the righting arm is
described in a linear function. S that it is difficult to
know the rolling motion of large amplitude in detail. Kan and Taguchi5' carried out an analysis of a mathe-matical model which takes into account the non-linear GZ curve and made an interesting discussion on the phenomena of chaos and fractals. In their study, the non-linear GZ curve was obtained somewhat simpler
manner.
This paper focuses on making an analytical approach
tO this problem by taking into account a non-linear
righting arm GZ more rigorously than the previous
studies. Since this equation of motion is described in an analytical expression, itwill be possible to investigate the features of low cycle resonance in detail.
2.
Equation of Low Cycle Resonance
The righting arm GZ varies with respect to the
rela-tive position ¿G of ship to a wave when a ship is running in longitudinal waves.The low cycle resonance occurs when the GZ varies with a period in a specific encounter
period of ship to waves. The characteristics of this
probleimare usually described mathematically as
(1)
where I. is the moment of inertia of a ship, J the addedmoment of inertia, K the damping coefficiént. W the
t
Osaka University** National Research Institute of' Fisheries
Engi-neering
Graduate School, Osaka University Received 10th Jan. 1995
198 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 177
ship weight and roll angle.
And then Eq.( 1) leads tÓ the following form
(2)
'
\TΫ
T)
GM-where a is the effective extinction coefficient, T the natural period of roll.
The GZ(çb, ) in Eq. ( 2) is calculated, based on the assumption of quasi-static equilibrium, by integrating. the quasi-hydrostatic pressure
over the momentary
submerged hull under the wave surface.
In order to
solve Eq.( 2 )riurnerically, it is necessary to make an
analytical expression of GZ as function of and Ec. This is the problem here to be considered because the
characteristics of low cycle resonance can be described depending ori the type of GZ curve.
Property of GZ in still water
In general, the GZ curve is mainly specified by the metacentric height GM, the integrated
area A of GZ
curve and the vanishing point of stability q5,.. They are given by
cvr_(th
'
\
d 1.oA=f'GZdcb
(3)
GZ=O at 5q5r
Êor simple expression, the GZ curve including three parameters at least may be described in the following
form
GZ=(GM C)-'-sin (T-)±
cft
sin (22r--.)(4)
Here GM and 5,. are immediately obtained from the GZcurve calculated by numerical method, C is
the coefficient describiñg concave and convex configuration of GZ curve at the small heel angle and determined by integrating the GZ curve asFigure 1 shows the GZ curves of two type which can be
described by Eq.( 4). The type lis the family of GZ
curve in case of negative C and type II is the family of
GZ curve in case of positive C. The GZ curve of the container ship used for our experiment belongs to the type I and the GZ curve of the purse seiner belongs to
the type II.
0.4
02
o
Variation of GZ in a wave
As mentioned early, the GZ curve in a wave varies with respect to the relative position of shipto a wave. According to Eq.( 4), it is possible to consider that the
variation of GZ in a wave is based on the variationof
three parameters GM, A and r
with respect to the
relative position of ship to a wave; The variätiôns of them can be expressed in the Fourier series as
GM(ec) .
A()
=ao+E(acos nkEc+b sin nkc)
nL(6)
where k is the wave number, ao, C
and b are the
coefficients determined by mean of Fourier analysis of
the GZ(,
).In Eq.( 6) the relative position¿cis a function of ship
speed U, phase velOcity c of wave at t.=0, and the
relative position EG of ship to a wave at any time t is.
given by
ÇG=Eo(c U)t
3.
Calculations of GZ-variation
To investigate the regions where the low cycle reso-nance occurs, the calculations of GZ-variation in a wave
have been carried out for a container ship and a purse seiner as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. In addition, the
principal dimensions of them are shown in Tables i and
2.
GZ-variàtions of container ship
The GZ variation was calculated in cases of GM
0.15 m and 0.318 m which satisfy the 1MO resolutions A 167 and A 562. Fig. 4 indicates the coefficients as a function of wave height to length ratio H/A in cases of
GM =0.15 m, Fig. 5 the three parameters of GM(Ea),
A(Ec) and as a function of the relative position Ec/A and Fig. 6 the GZ() in still water, GZ(, ¿) at the
0.6
0.4
0.2
o
Fig. 2 Body plan and GZ curve of container ship GZ [m] G=0318m G=OE15ni 40 [deg.]
'(Gl)
r
Y4\
GZ/(GÌfPr)''ner
GÏ755; or
o 0.4 0.8 / 0.4 0.8 Ø/,Fig. i Types of GZ curve of container ship and purse seiner
4
2
(-0.08
0.04
Analyses on Low. Cycle Resonance of Ship in Astern Seas 199
Fi'. Ai'.
Fig. 3 Body plan and GZ curve of purse seiner
Table i
Principal dimensions of container shipTable 2 Principal dimensions of purse seiner
wave crest and trough amidships
¡ri comparison..'
between the numerical calculation and approximate
expreiöii Figures 7, 8 and 9 indicate the coefficients
the three parameters and the GZ-variationz respectively in case of GM=O.318 rn.
' GZ-variation of purse seiner
The GZ-variátion was cakulated in case of GMO.75
m which critici1y satisfies 1MO A.685 weather criteria at the wind velocity equal to 19 rn/s. Figures iO, 11 and
12 show the coefficients, the three parameters and the GZ-variation in the same way as the container ship.
4.
Stable and unstable regions
of low cycle resonance
As well known, the low cycle resonance has been traditionally considered as the ' problem of linear
.Mathieu's equation'4 given in the form
.
±2(--) ±(2-)2[i+
COS(ko_Wet)]O
(8)
where 4GM is the variation of metacentric height, a the'
effective extinction coefficient, and the lowest and
widest unstable region at an encounter period of half
the natural roll period as shown in Fig. 13.
The problem here is to investigate the characteristics
of Mathieu's equation described with non-linear GZ
curve as shown in Eq. ( 2). For this purpose, a number
of the time domain simulations are carried out for the
container ship of GM =0.15 m and 0.318m, and the purse seiner of GM=0.755 m.
Stable and unstable regions for container ship
The stable and unstable regions for the wave height
to length ratio H/A versus the encounter period to
natural roll period ratio T/T are shown in Fig. 14 for GMO.15 ni and Fig. 15 for' GM=0.'318m in cases of wave to ship length ratio A/L=1.0, 1.5 and 2.0
respec-tively. Then the experimental results are shown for AIL
= 1.5 in comparison with computed results. An initial heel angle is five degrees and the relative position of
ship to a wave at the wave, trough amidships at the
beginning of a time domain simulation to initiate the roll motion. The region. bounded by H/A and T/T is
divided into 10.000 elements. The dot area indicates the
stable region and the white area the unstable region.
The stable and unstable regions simulated by Eq. ( 2)
described with the non-linear GZ are significantly
different frOm that simUlated by Eq. ( 8) described with the linear GZ. For Figs. 14 and 15. the unstable region become biggr as the wave to ship length ratiO A/L and
the metacentric height GM is smaller.
This is an
understandable trend.
Although, in the solution of
linear Mathieu's equation, the first resonance occurs at
T1/T=1/2 and'the second resonance occurs at Te/T i as shown in Fig. 13. both the first and second reso-nances shift to the direction of the shorter encounter period due to the effective natural roll period which is
smaller than in still water. The boundaries between the
- Items Ship Model
Length L(rn) 150.0 2.5
Breadth
B(m) 27.2 0.453 Depth D(m) 13.5 0.225 Draftdj(m)
8.50 0.142 da(m) 8.50 0.142 Block Coef. C6 0.667 0.667l.c.b. (aft)
-
-1.010 -0.0168Gyro. radius
in, pitchk/L
0.244 0.244 Metacentric GM(rn) 0.15 0.0025 height-Natural roll
periodT(sec)
43.37 5.59ModeiScale
-. .
-
1/60Items Ship. Model
Length ' L(in) 34.5 - 2.3
Breadth
B(m) . 7.6 0.507Depth
D(m) 3.07 0.205 Draft dj(xn) 2.84 0.189d(m)
3.14 0.209 Block Coef. C6 0.652' 0.643l.c.b. (aft)
-
1.742 0.116Gyro. radius
in pitch
k/L
0.332 0.332 Metacentric height GM(m) 0.755 0.0503Natural roll
periodT(sec)
7.47 1.93 Model Scale-
-
1/15GZ[]
G=0.755ai20: ...4Ö
t.
'[deg.]200 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol.177
'.2
=
.=
-A 20-s-
-o X 0' , GÏ=0.15[iu]I fL1
GÌ(c)
A( ÈG) oX 0
, GÏ=0.15[IJL=1
]approximate expression
..
numerical computation.AJLL5_
I S. L 0.04 0 HI II JL= Ls
I /L2
Fig. 4 Coefficients of GZ-variation of container ship
with GM= 0.15 m 0.03 HI I
approximate expression
numerial computation
AJ =2
H=8in i H=4mFig. S Three. parameters of GZ.variation of container
ship with GM =0.15 m
.ao
ai Abi o a2 t. 0.05 0H/I
o i 10 O 10E
E
O
O
Analyses on Low Cycle Resonance of Ship in Astern Seas 201
GÏ=O.318[m] r(ÈG) E à) 0.05
H/ I
Fig. 7 Coefficients with GM =0.313 rn H=8m ugh4troLigh
Ik1 VA1
crst
+crest'
t
05O0
- 50 Cdegj ç5 [dègjFig. 6 GZ-variations of container Ehip with GM0.15
m
apprôxiniate expression
s n.numerical computation
I /L=L5tiough
H=Sm 50[degj
A L2
of GZ-variation of container ship
0.03 HI X an o aj A bi o a2
, Gl=O.l5in
approximate expression
numerical computation
202 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects of Japan, VoI. 177 E E O o o X 0 , G1=O.318Cin]
¡,IIIIIII
I'II1Iii
¡,IlIi
ILWdI
£/L=1 IUUJIUR
Oc/ A
x=0
, GÏ=0318increst
trough-Illr8m itogh
.,-VAWI
lo
50 0 Ø [degj IÌL=L5¿ c/ I
approximate expression
nunierical computationÌ!tRP
10Fig. S Three parameters of GZ-variation of container
ship with GM=O.318m
- approximate exptessiôn
numerical computation-H=8m
tro ugh
Fig. 9 GZvariations of container ship with GMO.318
m
50
[degj
H=4ni
=
z
z
Q '-I Q o z.=O !: G10.75S[m] 'A /L=lGX()
r( ¿ c) od. o HI AX 0
GÏ=O.755[iJ A /L=1 Olo
Analyses on LOW Cycle Resonaice of Ship in Astern Seas 203
A/L=L5
Fig. 10 Coefficients of Glvariation of purse seiner
A/L=15 I
RRRRR
sapproximate expression
numerical Cowputation A/L=2- approximate expression
. A
numerical computation
H3.45m K=2.3in10
Fig. 11
Three parameters of GZ-variation of
purse seiñer.. ao
a a a2° bi.
0.05 0 H/A 0.05 H/ A204 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects Of Japan, Vol. 177 02 02 O z. 0 , G=O.755m R=2.3in
Fig.. 12 GZ-variation of purse seiner
approximate expression numerical computation
roll period ratio Te/T are shown in Fig. 17 for GM=
0.755 rn in cases of wave to ship length ratio A/L=1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 respectively. The unstable region becomes
bigger as the wave to ship length ratio AIL is smaller.
This is the same trend as the container ship. However,
the feature of unstable region is quite different from that of container ship. There is no first resonance but the second resonance at TeIT 1 which is not so wide and deep. This might be the reason why the low cycle
resonance did not occur in. the free
running modelexperiments of the purse seiner. Figure 18 shows the
time histories" obtained from the experiment in
cóm-parison with the results simulated. 5. Conclusions
An analytical approach was carried out to investigate the effect .of non-linear GZ on the stable and unstable regions of low cycle reonance summarized as follows
The mathematical model describing a single
rolling motion was presented for obtainiñg the
stable and unstable regions of low cycle
ro-nance.
A practical method was presented to describe the GZ-variation with respect to the relative
position of ship to a wave.
(3). To investigate what leads to low cycle
reso-nance, the. stable and unstable regions were numerically explored for both the container
ship and purse seiner.
(4)
Finally it was concluded that the occurrence oflow cycle resonance is one of the different
features of unstable region between container
ship and purse seiner.
o 0.5. Te/'r 1.0
Fig. 13 Stable and unstable regions of ship with linear
GZ curve
stable and unstablé regions are not distinct as pointed out by Kan and Taguchi..
On the other hand, free running model experiments7' were carried out for the container ship in cases of TeIT =0.4-0.7, A/L=1.5 and H/A=1/25. Fig. 16 shows the time histories7' of pitch and roll obtained from experi-ment of container ship model in comparison with results simulated.
Stable. and unstable regions for purse seiner
The stable and unstable regions for the wave height
Hl A 0 1/20 o H/A ¡ff25 O 0.5
Te/Il
OFig. 14 Stable and unstable regions of container ship with non-linear GZ curve of GMO.15 m and
the effective extinction coefficient a=O.271
Unstable
,, A 1/22.5 - 1/45 è.=0271.: --I G=O.318: A7LL0: 0.5 Te/T 1 0Unstable
H/A 1/15 Oo Not capsized in experiients
Capsized in experinents
---H/A
1/30 0.5Te/Il
1/60 O oUnstable
H/ A 1/30Fig. 15 Stable and unstable regions of container ship
with non-linear GZ curve of GM =0.318 m and the effective extinction coefficient a=0.271
Unstable
H/A1/20
0.5 1
a=O.2l85
i55
- --= GÏO755
able
-1i
!Stable_LL=L5
StableLÀLi0
0 1
Te/I 2
00 1T,i 2
0 1Te/I 2
Fig. 17
Stable and unstable regions of purse seiner
with non-linear GZ curve of GM =0.755 m and the effective extinction coefficient a=0.2185Analyses on Low Cycle Resonance of Ship in Astern Seas 205
T/T
10.5
Hl A
0:
io
-4e: Experimenf'
Pitch
25: Roll Angle(deg)
lo -25Simulation
Journal of The Society of Naval Architectsof.Japan, Vol.1717
20 0
(sec)
First Resonance at T/T.36 and. 1/LL5
Pitch
25: Roll Angle(deg)
O
-25:
Simulation
Second Resonance at TdT=O.71 and ?/L=L5
Fig. 16 Tire histories of pitch and roll for container
ship model in comparison with results
simulat-ed.
This study was carried out under the panel RR 24 of
Ship Building Research Association of Japan.The
authors wish to express their gratitude to members of
the RR 24, chaired by Prof.
Fujino for productivediscussions.
Ref èrences
1) Wátariabe, Y.: On the Dynamical Properties of
the Transverse Instability of a Ship due to
Pitch-25: Roll Angle(deg)
O-10-40: Roll Angle(deg)
oj\
-4OExperiment
\
10 20 30(sec)
3'O(sec)
0C
(sec)
-At TdT=L21 and l/L=L5
Fig. 18 Time histories of pitch and roll for purseseiner model in comparison with results simulated
ing, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 53, pp. 51-70, (1934).
Grim, O.: Rollschwingungen, . Stabilitat und Si-cherheit im Seegang, Schiffstechnik, (1952). 1
Kerwin J E
Notes on Roll in Longi Waves
mt. Ship. Prog:,. VOl. 2(16), (1955).Paulling, J. R. The Transverse Stability of a
Ship in a Longitudinal Seaway, Jour. of Ship
Research, SNAME, Vol. 4, No. 4, March, (1961).
Kan, M., Taguchi, H.
Capsizing of a Ship in
Quartering Seas(Patt 4. Chaos and Fractals in
Forced Mathieu Type Capsize Equation), Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan Vol
171, pp. 83-98, June, (1992).
Haniainoto, M., Fujino, M.: Capsize of Ships in Following Seas, Safety and Stability of Ships and
Offshore Strucbires Third Marine Dynamics
Symposium -, pp. 125-158,
(1986)-Umeda, N., Hamarnoto, M.,Takaishi, Y., Chiba. H., Matsuda, Sera, W., Suzuki, S.C, Spyrou, K., Watanabe, K.,: Model Experiments of Ship Cap. size in Astern Seas, Spring Meetings of the
Soci-ety of Naval Architects of Japan, (1995), (tò be
submitted.)