• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Comparison between static C.O.D.-tests and Niblink drop weight tests

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comparison between static C.O.D.-tests and Niblink drop weight tests"

Copied!
12
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

t'

LABORATORIUM VOOR

SCH EEPSCONSTRUCTI ES

TECHNISCHE HOGESCHOOL

-

DELFT

11W-doc. 2912-168-72.

RAPPORT Nr.

SSL 166

BETREFFENDE:

Comparison between static C.O.D.-tests and Niblink drop weight C.O.D.-tests.

(2)

CONPARÏSON BETWEEN STATIC C.O. D.-TESTS AdD NIBLINK DROP WEIGHT TESTS.

By

Prof.ir. J.3.W. iibbclng.

Summary.

Static C.O.D.-tests according to the CODA-procedure (Nichols et al. /1/) have been carried oui: with Electroslag-, Electrogas- and

Submerged-arc-welds. (See table I and figures i and 2).

In order to study size-effects, a number of static tests has also been

carried out with specimens of the Niblink type. The results of the latter

were generally somewhat more favourable than those of the former. (Table I and figures 1 and 2).

Niblink drop weight tests have been done for studying eventual relations between s tatic and impact testing. The results are shown in figures 3, ¡4

and S.

It is worth noting that the scatter of the results of the drop

weight tests is generally smaller toan ciau of the static C. O. D. -tests. 'l'he compariaom betwewn oath types of experiments is made in figures 6 a to g. (The dotted Lines in the figure represent COD z COD as a

- dm.

stat.

ret erence ) .

Where possible Lhe ratio between a residual C.O.D. of 0,05 mm at fracture (Niblink) and the staLic [racture C.O. D. at the same temperature has been given. it varies between 0,08 and 0,22 for '46 mm S.A. and '46 min E.S.

res-pecE ively.

-u

Fig're Ï aho:s Charpy-curves for some of the welds tested . A comparison

between the 0,06 ¡mn Niblink transition temperature, the 3,3 mm C.O.D. transition temperature aiiti the 3,5 kgm/cin Charpy transition is given in table II.*ihe Charpy arid Niblink results correspond well, probably partly because both involve high speed loading. The static C.O. 0.-results deviate

over a range from 3 to 6-3°C. * ce -Ço.

Ec () iz

Finally in figures 6 d and e the

lower safe temperature' estimated [rain full scad.e fat igue tests at low temperature with cracks in the H. A. Z. is

indicated. The corresoondingL C.O.D. 's - are equal to 0 3/ mm

static

.Çrc. Pr

and 0,22 min respectively. The :rttco1 C.O.U. 'Sd (residual) are C,0'-t

and O,C'15 mm resDectively. yn.

It is worth noting that for the static C.O.D. test-results of 34 and 46 mm

ACOD . - o o

E.G.- and L.S.-weids, the value

is rather small: O,i/t7

to 0,1/60

A femp.

(see frg.

I and 2).

Looking in concLìsiou tp tsble III the correspondance between Charpv and

Niblink results is

-öothat it may he seen as a support to the

Charpy-test!

-, Apparently all the well-known shortcomings of the Charpy-test

(thickness, initiation

-t- propagation energy instead of notch-deformation, notch acuity) do not appear in the results when a coniparison is made with a test in which the mentioned shortcomings have been eliminated. It may be concluded that the large differences between the static C.0. D. arid the

dynamic tests have to be attributed mainly to the difference in loading

type (static - impact).

(3)

SUMMARY OF C.O.D. TESTS (sTATIc LOADING). ipec.m.

No. Thickn.

in mm.

Specim.Type Temp.

°C. Type ofweld Locationof notch

FractureFracture

load

in tons

inC.O.D.mm.

Welding Data

ES1 '+6 NICHOLS -35 ES WELD 15.0 0.167 Welding Electro Slag

ES2 ES3 " 't 'I 'I O _55 " 't t, 'I 17.7 13.5 0.213

0.lkl

POWDER-ESAB 10/50 675AL46A ES4 ES5 " " I, NICHOLS -52 O " " t, IMM.HAZ 18.0

13.k 0.2800.386 WIRE TYPEBHOLER NIMO1 ES-NBI ES-NB2 t 46 NIBLINK NIBLINK -25-50 ES" Riaionlin " 40.0

35.2 O.2ki0.166 3 mm DIA.,1% Ni, +% Mo.

PD1 PD2 " NICHOLS " -30 -52 SA " 'Weld 15.8

14,9 0.4900.225 Welding Submerged.,Arc. k Rune.

PD3 "

- 7

" " 16.3 0.860 DOUBLE WIRE

PD4 1+6 NICHOLS -31 SA Weld 16.8 0.690 h/8ttDIA, SMIT No.29

PD-NBI 46 NIBLINK -3k SA Weld 1+6.5 0.565 925A-38V

PD-NB2 46 NIBLINK

- 5

SA Weld 1+9.5 0.880 POWDER TYPE No. 50.

EGI 3k NICHOLS -27 EG Weld 10.0 0.208 Welding Electro-GAS

EG2 " "

- I

" It 11.0 0.520

AMOUNT OF CO2

EG3 " tI -28 " " 10,1 0.120 30 L/MIN.

EGk " " _li.9 ti 8.5 0.11+0

600/625A-31v

EG5 " "

-

1+ " 1MM .HAZ

8.0 «

0.21+0 WIRE TYPE 2M/GY EG-NBI " NIBLINK -25 "

Peionline 31.0

0.332 1/8tt DIA.

EG-NB2 " NIBLINK -50 EG " 29.0 0.280

PD1 3k NICHOLS

- k

SA Weld 10.1+ 0.350 Welding

Submerged-PD2 " - 8 " 9.9 0.175 ARC. k Runs

PD3 " " -33 " " 9.9 0.180 DOUBLE WIRE

PD1+ " " -52 " '' 8.9 0.11+3 1/8tt DIA, SMIT No.29

PD5 " NICHOLS -28 " " 10.0 0.290 925A-38V

PD-NB1 3k NIBLINK -33 !t 38.7 0.355 POWDER TYPE No.50

PD-NB2 3k NIBLINK

- 6

" " 37.8 0.305

EGAl 22 NICHOLS

- 7

BG Weld 4.2 0.290 Welding Electro-GAS

EGA2 " " -32 " " 4.5 0.720 WIRE NORMAL

EGA3 t

" -31 ti 5.7 0.660

CARBON TYPE

EGA4 ti " -12 tI 5.2

4.1+85 2,1+ MM. DIA

EGA5 " -28 " Fusion line 4.3 1.150 YIELD 36kg/mm2

EGA6 EGA7 t, 't t, " -49 -33 u " 1MM.HAZ 4.0 4.0 0.6700.91+0 375A-38V. EGA8 tI tt -50 BG 1MM.HAZ 3.8 0.41+0 PDAI 22

" NICHOLS

- 8

SA t4e1d 5.1+ 0.1+80 Welding

Submerged-PDA2 " -26 't ' 5,3 0.290 ARC. 5 Runs PDA3 PDA4 " " "" -51-ko ti

" " 4.65.2 0.1250.190 600A-31iv,YIELD SA WELD PDA5 " "

- 5

" " 6.0 0.650 41,3 kg/mm2. PDA6 PDA7 " t, "

- k

-31 t, SA , " 6.0 5.3 0.7700.170

Ei

22 NICHOLS

- k

EG Weld 3.5 0.085 Welding Electro-GAS

EGB2 " -30 EG ft 4.0 0.360 WIRE SPECIAL

EGB3

"

"

- 5

" " 1+ 0 0.525 LOW CARBON TYPE

EGBk " -32 " Bision]Jne 3.8 0.095 2,1+ MM. DIA EGB5 " " -52 " " 3.5 0 080 375A-38V EGB6 " " -33 " 1MM HAZ 4.0 0,130 OYIELD 33,4 kg/mm2. EGB7 " " -49 " IMM.HAZ 3.7 0.105

PD1 22 NICHOLS

- 2

SA Weld 4.2 0.920 Welding

Submerged-PDB2 " " -30 " " 4.3

0.352 ARC. 600A-34v

PDB3 t? -48

" " ¿1.8 0.490 G YIELD 53kg/mm2.

(4)

PABEL - 2 TYPE OF WELD THICKNESS IN MM. CHARPY

3.5 KGM/CM2 NIBLINK TEST DYNAMIC 0.06 MM. C.o.D.A.TES'r STATIC 03 MMO

-ES - '+6 +100 C + 200 C + 22° C SUB. ARG. '+6

-

+0 - 1+6° EG 3'+ +13° " / + 18° " - 19°

SUB. ARG. 31+

-

+ 13° " loo

EG (A) 22 - 8° '.' 30 - 62° "

SUB.ARG.(A) 22 -18° " - 13° " - 23°

EG (B) 22 +27° " + 27° " - 2'+° suB.ARG.(B) 2 50 - 63°

(5)

MM

l'lo- f16-Bewerkingstekens 'l voIgen N 785 TECHNISCHE HOGESCHOQL LAB,v. SCHEEPSCONSTRUCTIES DE L FT

TEST SPECIMENS ACCORDING TO

C.QD.A. COMMITTEE. NOTCHESATSUBMERGEO ARC.WELOS. CEXCEPT AS NOTED) A NI B LIN K [STATI C A

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0 +10 °C

TESTTEM PER ATURE

C.O.D AT FRACTURE VERSUS TEMPERATURE.

SUBMERGED ARC. WELD

2'=25±2 25 25±1 25,=25±0,2

25=25±0.5 25,Ô25j0.1

BEN AMING:

NIB LIN K(STATIC/EST)

25,0 = 25 ±0.05 25,0v = 25 ± 0.02

/

/

TEK. NO. SC. BLAD NO. u

34MM

25,00=25± 0.01 25,0025±0,005

I'

IBLINK(STATIC TEST)

46MM

//

/&22/HM

B

/tJ

22MM A

NIaLINK (STATIC TEST)

£ 46 MM THICK

.34MM

1)

22 MM(A),,

0 22 SC 1-fAAL DATUM GET. FORMAAT: A4 Q9- 0.7-O5 0.4-

0.3-

02-

(6)

01-M 01-M C.OD.(STATIC) 1,2

¡ a

TESTSPECIMENSACCORDING TO

C.O.DA. COMMITTEE.

NOTCHEs.Ar ELECTRO_SLA 6/_GAS W4

(EXCEPT AS NOTED)

A.

NIBLINKT4TIC T IMMH.A.Z

/

446MM THICK

/

- ô 34MM

/

Q22MM(A) p)

/

/1

FUS ION LIN

Q

/

a

L

M M HA Z

41MMH.A2

0

(FU SI ONUNEFUSI ON LI NE

TESTT EM P TO 1.485 MM

1

LDS 22 MM.A

o.

¿ ¿

ri

NI BLINK

S#1MM

H.A.Z (STATIC TEST17'

4

o

-1?3,MM

9-46

MM

G

1-1MM HA.Z I I

-60

-50

-40

-30 -20 -10 0 +10 °C

G.O.D AT FRACTURE

VERSUS TEMPE RATURE.

ELECTRO SLAG/_ GAS WELD

i/I

(7)

0.12

-0.10

0.02

O O

-20

0

+20 +40 °C

-20

0

+20 ±40

°C

DoP'&E4T TE

6Mt4 $,'JELD

DQoP..VJE4TTET 5M\

.WEL.D

FIG. . MM 0.12 -0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 O o o

(J

5A.4iA.

MM 0.12 -0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 o o

-20

0 1-20 °C 0

20

-4-40

Tsr 2'MM A EG. WLO OQ0PWE6HT 1ET

2eMW

B G.WEL

DRWEIkT TET5 OF ELCTC

-

SLAG/-A WELDS

0.08

0.06

(8)

0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 o 0.06 0.04

20

0

+20 °C

20

0

+20

°C

DPJE1G4TrEr ¿MMS.A.\LD

DPWIGHTTEV 34MW¼ A,\IJELD

F'G.5A

D. MM 0.12 -0.10

08

o

fre.

C.0.D.

IAM 0.12 -0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 O 20 0

+20 °C

oP..\&EÇET

'MM A

DPWEG-kT TE6TS Ö'

QbMSED ARC. \ÑEL5

0.02

O

o

(9)

C .0.0. DYMAIC(iou)

MM. 0.10- 0.05- 0.L-D 0.111 co.o.

r

/

r-/

-)/ O

I Jo'Çc44 Al' z. O 01 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 06 MM.

C.0.0. TArc

c.o.. l'Tlc

4MA uMecEE AC.WELD

FlG.e

C..D.

MM Q5-Bewerkingsrekens volgens N 785 TECHNISCHE HOGESCHOOL LAB.v. SCHEEPSCQNSTRUCTIES DE L FT 23'=25±2

/

/

COO. 25=25±1 25,=25±O.2 25=25±0,5 25,625±0,l BEN AMING: C.o.O. OYAMIC(V.ESPoRI MM. 0.1. 0.05 O

= o.14o

25,0 = 25±0.05 25,0v= 25 ± 0,02 o = C.O.O. 'bTAT%C )JOTC AT J'L0. 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10 Ii MM

46 MM Su8MEW AC

. 'JEt.D 0.2 -

/

)4Tc.4 AT E 0

/

0.1-

/

/

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Oh 0.5 0.6 MA

c..o. crirtc

FIGGc eMk L.A AY'C. WELD

C o. D. DY?AM c (vesroAL) vso S CO. D. STAT

\ C

25,00=25± 0,01 25,00 = 25 ± 0,005 EK. NO. SC. LAD NO. SC HA AL DATUM GET. FORM A AT A4 0.3-

/

(10)

C.o.O.

C.o.,

M. MM 0.1 ¡ C.O.D. 0.1-/ OYÑ.(e.o)- o.Z22 / 0.05 I I I I / I I I FI&.

ED

I

I

NV

I$o194 k IHM H.&.Z.

/

e

'a

u. $ci

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Ob 0.5 0.6 MM 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 01. 0.5 0.6 MW'

C.o..

TA1c

46Mtr\ E.ECToLAa

WLO 24IM

LEC oA WELD

FiG.

D"/ÑAM (C (uAC)

C.o. vttc (TecAL

MM MM 0.1-P I 0.1 0.05-

/

/ )o1C4 AT

/

s ____o J ,-Zo 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 01. 0.5 0.6 MM C.o. rAiC

'2Mw

eeuALB ELTIo..cA)L

FGg. Cä.D. DY

MIc1E'ooAL) V5us Co.t.

flC

Bewerkingstekens volgens N 785 TECHNISCHE HOGESCHOOL s LAB.v. SCHEEpSCQNSTRUCTIE5 DEL FT 21'=25±2 0.05 -0.05 I I I i I I z--I

i

-b ,I

Fy

s - 2o o 1.1 1.2 1.3 11. 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.85 MM C.o. £tAI1C

'MM QOALJ ELco

VJELO

e.o.o. STATic -d.O.D. YP.).(e.O6) C.O.D. lXATC o. 091 2525±I 25,=25±0,2 25,0 = 25 ±0.05 25=25±0,5 25,O25±o,I 25,00 = 25 ± 0,02 25,00=25± 0,01 25,0025 ± 0,005 SC H A AL BEN AMI NG: TEK.NO.

DATUM

Sc.

GET.

BLAD NO.

(11)

z

o

-20 -10

0 +10+20

-20 -10

0 +10 +20

°C

cpyy V.UE oF iMME.

c4pyv VA\.uE OFI4MA

G.

FIG.7

16-14 12 10 8 6 4 2 O

F\

7ACD.

o 16 - 16-14 72 10 8 6 1; 2 O 14 12 10 8 6 4 2MM .)WELD MM W WELD o o

- 60 -1.0 -20

0

+20+40+60°C

0 -s-10 +20 +30 40+50+60 +70*80°

cpy,.v vALu

oF 7t

A EG,

HAIpy,v vuas 0F

Ft. 7c

F&7

CApy VALu3 o.

CTQLAG/AC

(12)

12 (o 2 FI

7

. s . s s s s s s

o

I I i i i a i i t i L t -5oJ4o -2e

0

cpy.,v '1ALu

r

?M A

AcS,

s

s

i I I I i i i I i i I i ¡ i i

40

0

42o

-o

-o

-1%o

-4-0o °c

cH4py..v

o

tiW

B 5u..

WELD

7r

Py..v VALUES OBME Ac. WELD

IcurE 7e.

s

4

i

44 Io 6

o

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

W części drugiej wstępu (Greco classico e greco koinè) Christophe Rico zwraca uwagę, że obecne studia nad językiem greckim zmierzają do pozna- nia dialektu attyckiego,

Trzecia cecha charakterystyczna powieści skrywa się w fakcie, że napisana została w języku niemieckim, który nie jest językiem ojczystym autorki.. Hader‑ lap, Słowenka karyncka

moniKa gaWlaK | doktor nauk humanistycznych, literaturoznawczy- ni, słowenistka, adiunkt w zakładzie Teorii literatury i Translacji w instytucie Filologii Słowiańskiej

N ajw ażniejszym jednakże dziełem pro­ fesora Lin Hong L ianga pozostaje niew ątpliw ie biografia jego um iłow anego po­ ety, zatytułow ana M ickiew icz, Seczuan

Być może rozmycie przez radców prawnych i doradców, likwidacja samorządu i sprowadzenie jego roli do czynności rejestrowych, kontrola fiskalna i majątkowa, państwowa dyscyplina

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright

Czar- nobyl jako wydarzenie traumatyczne oddziałuje z opóźnieniem: powraca nie tylko we wspomnieniach, ale także ujawnia się poprzez ciało, które czuje się coraz

The applicators include curved needle channels that can be used for intracavitary and guided interstitial needle placement.. Further spatial optimisation of brachytherapy