• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

POISSON GEOMETRY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "POISSON GEOMETRY"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

POISSON GEOMETRY

Stanis law Zakrzewski in memoriam

Editors of the Volume

J A N U S Z G R A B O W S K I P A W E L U R B A ´N S K I

W A R S Z A W A 2000

(2)

POISSON GEOMETRY

BANACH CENTER PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 51 INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

WARSZAWA 2000

FOREWORD

Poisson geometry originated in the study of classical mechanics and took on new importance when Poisson brackets were understood as the classical “shadow” of quantum commutator brackets. Although some of the basic examples and properties of Poisson brackets were already found in the 19th century (Poisson, Jacobi, Lie. . . ), the systematic study of Poisson geometry really began with the work of Lichnerowicz and Kirillov in the mid 1970’s. Over the following two decades, the subject flourished to the point where it seemed appropriate to convene an international workshop on Poisson geometry.

In 1996, the Banach Center proposed to Professors Janusz Grabowski and Stanis law Zakrzewski that they organize such a meeting in 1998 as a satellite conference to the ICM in Berlin. Along with Jean-Paul Dufour and Mikhail Zhitomirskii, I gladly joined the organizing committee of the workshop, although personal considerations eventually made it impossible for me to attend. The aim of the meeting, which was well realized, was to gather people working on all aspects of the geometric, algebraic, and physical aspects of Poisson manifolds and their quantizations.

As all the workshop participants and many readers of this volume know, Stan* Za- krzewski died suddenly at the end of April, 1998, less than four months before the meet- ing**. The importance of Stan’s contributions to Poisson geometry, his role in organizing the workshop, and most important the warm personal feelings we had toward our friend left no question but that this workshop and its proceedings would be dedicated to his memory.

On behalf of the editors, I hope that this volume will enable its readers (myself included!) to benefit from the assembly of Poisson geometers gathered in Warsaw in August, 1998, and to learn the “state of the art” in the young subject in which Stanis law Zakrzewski’s scientific and personal contributions have meant so much.

Alan Weinstein

* “Stan” was his self-chosen English nickname. Of course, he was Staszek, Sta´s to his Polish friends.

** Workshop on Poisson Geometry, 3–15 August 1998, Warsaw.

[5]

(3)

CONTENTS

Stanis law Zakrzewski (28.6.1951–30.4.1998) . . . 9–10 S. Zakrzewski, Poisson structures on R2n having only two symplectic leaves: the

origin and the rest . . . 11–13 S. Bouarroudj and V. Yu. Ovsienko, Schwarzian derivative related to modules of

differential operators on a locally projective manifold . . . 15–23 P. Bonneau, Classifications of star products and deformations of Poisson brackets . 25–29 M. Cahen, S. Gutt and J. Rawnsley, Symplectic connections with parallel Ricci

tensor . . . 31–41 J. F. Cari˜nena and J. Clemente-Gallardo, Quantization of the cotangent bundle

via the tangent groupoid . . . 43–53 V. Chloup, Linearization and star products . . . 55–60 J.-P. Dufour, Singularities of Poisson and Nambu structures . . . 61–68 V. L. Ginzburg and R. Montgomery, Geometric quantization and no-go theorems 69–77 J. Grabowski, Isomorphisms of Poisson and Jacobi brackets . . . 79–85 J. Huebschmann, Differential Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras arising from twilled Lie-

Rinehart algebras . . . 87–102 E. Karolinsky, A classification of Poisson homogeneous spaces of complex reductive

Poisson-Lie groups . . . 103–108 Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Modular vector fields and Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras . 109–129 O. Kravchenko, Deformations of Batalin–Vilkovisky algebras . . . 131–139 J. Kubarski, Connections in regular Poisson manifolds over R-Lie foliations . . . 141–149 P. Libermann, On Liouville forms . . . 151–164 Z. J.Liu, Some remarks on Dirac structures and Poisson reductions . . . 165–173 K. C. H. Mackenzie, Affinoid structures and connections . . . 175–186 G. Mar´i Beffa, The theory of differential invariance and infinite dimensional Hamil-

tonian evolutions . . . 187–196 C.-M. Marle, On submanifolds and quotients of Poisson and Jacobi manifolds . . . . 197–209 K. Mikami and A. Weinstein, Self-similarity of Poisson structures on tori . . . 211–217 P. Mormul, Contact Hamiltonians distinguishing locally certain Goursat systems . . 219–230 I. V. Mykytyuk and A. M. Stepin, Classification of almost spherical pairs of compact

simple Lie groups . . . 231–241 N. Nakanishi, Nambu-Poisson tensors on Lie groups . . . 243–249 A. Panasyuk, Veronese webs for bihamiltonian structures of higher corank . . . 251–261 P. Stachura, C-algebra of a differential groupoid . . . 263–281 I. Vaisman, Aspects of geometric quantization theory in Poisson geometry . . . 283–292

[7]

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Van der Schaft and Maschke [20] have shown that in the geometric theory of mechanical systems with kinematic constraints, it is natural to introduce, on the submanifold of the

The examples discussed above point to the importance of the Poisson kernels on the Furstenberg boundaries which in the case of non-symmetric Siegel domains do not coincide with

These inflated distributions were introduced for the situations which are described by simple (binomial or Poisson) distributions except for zero celles (or some

крывающие новый этап изучения языка В­К и способов его публикации. Что же касается эдиционной части, то ее принципы были апробированы в предыдущем томе, который,

In recent issues of Polish Psychiatry the im- pact of cognitive impairment on the effects of treatment [6] and the possibility of cognitive rehabilitation [7] has been already

Kahn, a renowned authority in the field of neurobiology and pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia, leading author of the well-known and important EUFEST research [4-6] (until December 2014

The following easy result shows that countably incomplete ultrapowers of infinite structures are always non-trivial..

Given that the area set aside for arable land, for example, in the Donetsk region, reaches 64% of its territory, this impact will lead to a significant decline in the quality