• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

THE NEOLITHIC OF THE MOUNTAINOUS CRIMEA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "THE NEOLITHIC OF THE MOUNTAINOUS CRIMEA"

Copied!
61
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Pavel M. Dolukhanov

Lu yna Doma«ska

Ali e Marie Haeussler

LeiuHeapost Ken Ja obs Valeriy I. Khartanovi h PhilipL.Kohl Nadezhda S. Kotova Ri hard W. Lindstrom Ilze Loze Dmitriy Nuzhnyi Inna D. Potekhina Dmitriy Telegin Vladimir I. Timofeev Aleksander A. Yanevi h LeonidZaliznyak 1 V O L U M E 5

1998

(2)

‘w.Mar in78

Tel.(061)8536709ext. 147,Fax(061)8533373

EDITOR AleksanderKo±ko EDITOROFVOLUME Lu ynaDoma«ska KenJa obs EDITORIALCOMMITEE

SophiaS.Berezanskaya (Kiev),AleksandraCofta-Broniewska

(Pozna«), Mikhail Charniauski (Minsk), Lu yna Doma«ska

(Šód¹), ViktorI. Klo hko (Kiev), Valentin V. Otrosh henko

(Kiev),PetroTolo hko (Kiev)

SECRETARY

MarzenaSzmyt

SECRETARYOFVOLUME

Andrzej Rozwadowski

ADAMMICKIEWICZUNIVERSITY

EASTERNINSTITUTE

INSTITUTEOFPREHISTORY

Pozna«1998

ISBN83-86094-04-4

(3)

Pavel M. Dolukhanov

Lu yna Doma«ska

Ali e Marie Haeussler

LeiuHeapost Ken Ja obs Valeriy I. Khartanovi h PhilipL.Kohl Nadezhda S. Kotova Ri hard W. Lindstrom Ilze Loze Dmitriy Nuzhnyi Inna D. Potekhina Dmitriy Telegin Vladimir I. Timofeev Aleksander A. Yanevi h LeonidZaliznyak 1 V O L U M E 5

1998

(4)

CoverDesign: EugeniuszSkorwider

Lingvisti onsultation:MonikaWoj ieszek

PrintedinPoland

(5)
(6)
(7)

EDITORS'FOREWORD ... 7

KenJa obs,Lu ynaDoma«ska, "BEYONDBALKANIZATION"{AN

OUTLINEPROGRAMFORADISCUSSION ... 9

PavelM.Dolukhanov,THENEOLITHICWITHAHUMANFACE

ORDIVIDINGLINESINNEOLITHICEUROPE? ... 13

Ri hard W.Lindstrom,HISTORYANDPOLITICSINTHEDEVELOPMENT

ETHNOGENETICMODELSINSOVIETANTHROPOLOGY ... 24

Philip L.Kohl, NATIONALIDENTITYANDTHEUSE

OFTHEREMOTEPASTINTHECAUCASUS ... 34

Vladimir I.Timofeev, THEEAST|WESTRELATIONS

INTHELATEMESOLITHICANDNEOLITHIC

INTHEBALTICREGION ... 44

Ilze L oze,THEADOPTIONOFAGRICULTUREINTHEAREA

OFPRESENT-DAYLATVIA(THELAKELUBANABASIN) ... 59

DmitriyTelegin, MESOLITHICCULTURAL-ETHNOGRAPHIC

ENTITIESINSOUTHERNUKRAINE:GENESISANDROLE

INNEOLITHIZATIONOFTHEREGION ... 85

DmitriyNuzhnyi,THEUKRAINIANSTEPPEASAREGION

OFINTERCULTURALCONTACTSBETWEENATLANTIC

ANDMEDITERRANEANZONESOFEUROPEANMESOLITHIC ... 102

L eonidZaliznyak,THELATEMESOLITHICSUBBASE

OFTHEUKRAINIANNEOLITHIC ... 120

Aleksander A.Yanevi h, THENEOLITHICOFTHEMOUNTAINOUS

CRIMEA ... 146

Nadezhda S.Kotova,THEROLEOFEASTERNIMPULSEIN

DEVELOPMENTOFTHENEOLITHICCULTURESOFUKRAINE ... 160

Ali e MarieHaeussler, UKRAINEMESOLITHICCEMETERIES:

DENTALANTHROPOLOGICALANALYSIS ... 195

InnaD.Potekhina,SOUTH-EASTERNINFLUENCESON

THEFORMATIONOFTHEMESOLITHICTOEARLYENEOLITHIC

POPULATIONSOFTHENORTHPONTICREGION:

THEEVIDENCEFROMANTHROPOLOGY ... 226

L eiuHeapost,GENETICHETEROGENEITYOFFINNO-UGRIANS

(ONTHEBASISOFESTONIANMODERNANDARCHAEOLOGICAL

MATERIAL) ... 232

ValeriyI.Khartanovi h, NEWCRANIOLOGICALMATERIAL

ONTHESAAMIFROMTHEKOLAPENINSULA ... 248

(8)
(9)

This volume ontains the majority of the papers presented during a

onfe-ren ethattookpla e on16th-21stMay,1997inŠód¹,Poland.The onferen e was

organized by the Institute of Ar haeology, University of Šód¹ and Departement

d'anthropologie, Universitede Montreal(Canada). The onferen e wasfundedby

theUniversityofŠód¹andbyIREX(InternationalResear h&Ex hangesBoard),

whi h also supported this publi ation. The publi ation was partly foundedbythe

UniversityofŠód¹andbytheFoundationofAdamMi kiewi zUniversity,too.

The major questions of the onferen e were, 1) whatisthe urrenteviden e

foreastern orsouthernin uen es inthedevelopmentofeastern European

Meso-lithi andNeolithi populations,and2)to whatextentare urrentpoliti altrends,

espe ially the reassertion or, in some ases, the reation of ethni and national

identities, in uen ingourinterpretationsoftheprehistori data.

The idea for su h a onferen e ame into being through the o-organizers'

long-termstudiesofthedevelopmentofthoseprehistori humanpopulationswhi h

inhabitedthevastregionstret hingnorthandeastfromtheOderriverand

Carpa-thianMountainstothefoothillsoftheUrals. Ina traditionestablishedin modern

times byGordon Childe, virtually all of the transformationsof EasternEurope's

Neolithi Age human lands ape have been assumed to be responses to prior

de-velopments in the Balkan peninsula and Danube basin. We think that a body of

neweviden e requiresa renewedanalysisof thedistributionsof ultural produ ts,

peoples,andideas a rossEasternEuropeduringtheMesolithi throughtheEarly

Metal Age withina mu h wider geographi ontext than previouslyhas been the

ase.Thisin ludesgivingadequateattentiontothefar-rangingintera tionsof

om-munitiesbetweenthePonti andBalti areawiththoselo atedinboththeCau asus

andtheAralo-Caspianregions.

Wehope thatthisvolumewill ontributetosu ha redire tion offuture

ana-lyses.

Lu ynaDoma«ska

(10)

1.All datesintheB-PSare alibrated [see:Radio arbonvol.28,1986,andthe

next volumes℄(other versions are ited for thewish of authors).Deviations from

thisrulewillbe pointoutin notes.

2. The names of thear haeologi al ultures (espe ially from theterritory of

theUkraine)arestandarizeda ordingtotheEnglishliteratureonthesubje t(e.g.

Mallory 1989). In the ase of a new term, the author's original name has been

(11)

PLISSN1231-0344

AleksanderA.Yanevi h

THE NEOLITHIC OF THE MOUNTAINOUS CRIMEA

The rstNeolithi site,situatedinthemountainouspartofCrimea, has been

dis overed at thebeginning of the20th entury[Moiseev 1918℄, andin the1930s

the Neolithi period has been taken into onsideration in divisions of the Stone

Age of Crimea for the rst time [Bader 1940℄.In 1950-1980new siteshave been

dis overed andinvestigated, and asa resultof these a new systemof divisions of

theCrimeaNeolithi ameintobeing[Kraynov1960;Formozov1962;Sh hepinskiy

1968;Kolosov1971;Telegin1982℄.Atthesame time anewapproa honrelatively

fasttransitionfrom hunting and food-gatheringto farmingand attle breedingin

Crimeao uraswellasonlo alpigdomesti ation[Kraynov1960;Formozov1962;

Kolosov1971℄.Theseapproa hesarehoweverin ontradi tiontotheresultsofnew

resear h.Thepro essoftheNeolithizationofCrimearaninmore ompli atedway

thanithadbeenthoughtbeforebe ausehunter-gatherersandfarmers ould o-exist

foralongtime.Thatpro essre e tstheNeolithi ofthemountainpartofCrimea.

1. PALEOECOLOGY

Crimea, inrespe toftopography,isdividedintotwoparts:thenorth|whi h

is a plain, and the south | whi h is a mountainous part. Three main mountain

rangesbelongtothemountainsregion:northwiththeheightofupto250mabove

sealevel, entral|withtheheightofabout500m,andsouth,thehighest,rea hing

800-1500m.Thepe uliarityofthemain(thehighest)rangeareimmense plateaux

onthemountainridges.

The limate ofthepeninsula hasbeen, sin etheendofEarlyHolo ene,

de -nitely warmandhumid, similarto thepresentone. Boreal warming iswell

availa-ble,espe iallyin pollendiagramsoftheKer hsites[Matskevoy,Pashkevi h1973℄,

and in diagrams from theShan-Koba settlement [Besusko, et al. 1998℄. It isalso

(12)

themid-Holo ene temperatures di eredfor 1-2C fromthepresentonesandthe

totalfall for100mmattheoutmost[Savina, Khotinskiy1982℄.

Ina ordan e withtherhythm of limati hanges of theendof Early

Holo- eneandinmid-Holo enetypi alvegetationzoneswereformed. Inthenorthpart

of Crimea, steppes overed witha great variety of grassesdeveloped[Matskevoy,

Pashkevi h1973;Pashkevi h 1982℄.

Anin reasing humidityin themountainouspart ofCrimea aused the

repla- ement of oniferous forests by de iduous trees growing in warm ir umstan es.

Their ompositionisavailable in har oalspe trainL ateMesolithi mountainous

settlements [Gammermann 1934℄ and in pollen diagrams of the Shan-Koba site

[Besusko,etal. 1998℄.Chara teristi spe iesareas follows:oak,bee h, mapleand

rowan.AttheendoftheL ateHolo eneinthemountainouspartatypi alverti al

division of vegetation developed. There were forest-steppezones, bee h and oak

forestsandsteppeonthenorthslopes[Rubtsov1978:26-75℄.Thepresen eofthese

zones has been on rmedfor the boreal and Atlanti periods bypollen analyses

arried outby L. Besusko for Shan-Kobasite [Besusko, etal. 1998℄.The

investi-gation of fauna in theL ateMesolithi settlements ofthe se ond mountainrange

gave similarresults.Theyshowa noti eabledominationofforestfaunainrelation

tothesteppeone[Vekilova1971℄.

Atthede line oftheEarlyHolo enethepro essoffauna omplexesforming

indi erentareasofthepeninsula ametotheend.Forestfaunadominatedinthe

mountainouspart; boars, deer and roe deer are knownfrom theL ate Mesolithi

andNeolithi settlements.Fauna ofopenorhalf-openbiotops|auro hs,donkey

and horse, isknown only o asionally from the settlementswhi h are situatedin

notfardistan efromthesteppezone(AlimovskiyNaves,Zamil-KobaII)[Vekilova

1971℄.Auro hs,bison,tarpananddonkeyrepresentthefaunaoftheCrimeaplain.

Theirbonesdominate in osteologi almaterial oftheMesolithi andNeolithi

set-tlementsfromthatarea. Saiga antelope anddeer are alsofoundinsmall amounts

[Matskevoy1977℄.

2. THELATEMESOLITHICSUB STRATUMOFTHEMOUNTAINOUSCRIMEA

NEOLITHIC

Typologi alandstatisti alanalysesofthe intmaterial,basedontheRobinson`s

indexwithmi rolithsasabase,andon omparisonofall ategoriesofartefa tsallow

todistinguish veL ateMesolithi andNeolithi ulturesinCrimea[Yanevi h1995℄.

Threeofthemareknownforalongtime,theyare:Murzak-Koba,KukrekandT

ash--Air ultures[Bon h-Osmolovskiy1934;Vekilova1966;Kolosov1971;Telegin1982;

Yanevi h1987a,1995℄.Theothertwo ulturesaresymptomsofnewL ateMesolithi

(13)

Fig.1.ThemapoftheTash-Air ulturesites.1-Tash-Air1;2-Zamil-Koba2;3-AlimovskiyNaves;

4-At-Bash;5-Kaya-Arasy;6-Denisovka;7-PetrovskaBalka;8-Shpan-Koba;9-Buran-Kaya3;10

-Adzy-Koba2.

There are two di erent views onthe genesis of theTash-Air ulture.

A or-dingtomostofthespe ialists that ulturedevelopedonthelo alL ateMesolithi

substratum[Kraynov1960:91-104;Formozov1962:117;Sh hepinskiy1968:121-133;

Kolosov1971:129-135;Yanevi h 1995℄.Only N.N.Danilenko onne tedtheorigin

of the Neolithi of themountainous Crimea with the Kukrek ulture [Danilenko

1969:189℄.

Comparisonof theL ateMesolithi andNeolithi intmaterial showsgeneti

linksbetweentheMurzak-KobaandTash-Air ultures.TheMurzak-Koba ultureis

representedbythefollowing omplexes: Murzak-Koba[Bibikov1940℄,Shan-Koba,

layer3and2,Fatma-Koba,layer4,3and2[Bibikov1966℄,Adzy-Koba3[Yanevi h

1984℄,L aspi7[Telegin1982℄,Shpan-Koba|theupperlayer,Kara-Koba[Kolosov

1960℄andothers.Sites of that ulture are situatedex lusively in themountainous

partofCrimea. Intheareaofthese ond(mountain)rangetheyo urinabris,on

plateauxandonopen oastalsites.

TheMurzak-Koba ultureis hara terisedbyrelativelyhighlydevelopedblade

te hnique. P yramid ores prevail in its assemblages (51-89%; Fig. 2:49, 50, 77).

There also o ur ores with doubleplatform(7-43%; Fig.2:51), pen il ores (Fig.

2:52)are knownaswell(4%),theyservedtoobtainingmi roblades.

AmongtheMurzak-Koba ulture mi rolithsgeometri forms(72-100%ofall

themi roliths),ba kedbladelets(7%;Fig.2:70,71)andtrun atedpie es(4%)

(14)
(15)

prevail (81-11%);their main type isa symmetri trapeze with steep retou h (Fig.

2:7,25-27,60-61).Theothertypeisformedbyasymmetri trapezes,one-sided

on- ave (Fig. 2:8-10, 30-31).A hara teristi typeof the Murzak-Koba ulture are a

veryshort,symmetri orasymmetri trapezes withnot hedretou honupperbase

(Fig.2:11,28,62),so- alled Fatma-Kobatrapezes.Segmentso urnotnumerously

(5-23%;Fig.2:14, 68),triangles arerare.

In omparisonwithanothertools,s rapersappearnotinlargeamountswithin

theMurzak-Koba ulture(7-13%).Theyare usuallymade ofblades butalso

s ra-persona akethatprevailin ertainassemblages, anbefound.Straightand onvex

s rapers onablade (Fig.2:17-18,44-45,75)ands rapersona ake (Fig.2:15-16)

shouldbealsomentioned,whereasburinsareevenlessnumerousthans rapers

(me-rely6%).Dihedralburinsandburinsonsnapprevail(Fig. 2:21,43,48);burinson

trun ation(Fig.2:80-82)arelessnumerousandtheybelongtoso- alledKukrek-type

burins(Fig.2:53-54).The hara teristi featureoftheMurzak-Kobaassemblagesis

an o urren eoflargeamountsofblades withnot hedretou h(54-66%).

Among bone tools arrowheads, harpoons and frames [Bibikov 1977; Telegin

1982;Kolosov1960℄arerepresented.Bonearrowheadsarehomogeneous,theyhave

ir le oroval ross-se tionandare from 0,8to1,3 m indiameter, their lengthis

|judgingfromwell-preservedspe imens|about7 m.Anarrowheadfromlayer

3ofShan-Kobaandtheonefromlayer3ofFatma-Kobahaveanelongatedgroove

(Fig.2:83),andanarrowheadfromL aspi 7|twogrooves (Fig.2:56).The length

ofharpoonsis6-8 mandtheir diameter|0,7-1 m. Theyhaveasymmetri row

ofteeth(Fig.2:58-59,87-88).

It is possible to distinguish three stages of the Murzak-Koba ulture

deve-lopment onthe basis of inttools te hnologyand morphology(Fig. 2).The rst

stage in ludes theMurzak-Koba, Shan-Koba(layer 3) and Fatma-Koba (layer 4)

assemblages, the se ond one | the Fatma-Koba (layer 3), Adzy-Koba , L aspi 7,

Shpan-Koba(layer1-2and1-3)andtheKara-Koba assemblages, andthethird|

theShan-Koba(layer 2),Shpan-Koba(layer1-1)andKukrek(layer3).

3. GENERALCHARACTERISTIC SOFTHETASH-AIRCULTURE

Nowadays over 30 Tash-Air ulture sites are known. They are as follows:

Tash-Air 1 (layer 8-5a), Zamil-Koba 2 (layer 8-5); [Kraynov 1960℄, Adzy-Koba 2

[Yanevi h 1984℄, At-Bash [Formozov 1962℄,Kaya-Arasy (lower layer);

[Sh hepin-skiy1962℄,Buran-Kaya3(layer3),Denisovka[Sh hepinskiy1968℄,Zuya1[Vekilova

1951℄et . All ofthemare situated in themountainousarea ofCrimea, in the

se- ondmountainrangeoronplateaux(Fig.1).Inthemountainstheyaremainlyabris,

someofthemare open.Theopensitesaresituatedontheplateau, usuallyonthe

(16)

Flintprodu tion

Chara teristi featureoftheTash-Air ultureisahighlevelofbladete hnique.

Blades derive hie y from ores with single platform (40-74%, Fig. 3:17, 39-40;

4:33, 35; 5:31-32).Spe ial types of ores with single platformare spe imens with

round aking surfa e(Fig. 3:39;5:32). Spe imens with doubleplatformrepresent

these ondtypeof ores(31-51%;Fig. 4:34;5:30).Othertypesare rare.

The Tash-Air ulture mi rolithi te hnique is represented by geometri

mi- roliths (89-93%)and ba ked bladelets (3-11%; Fig. 3:32; 4:10-14;5:12). Among

the geometri mi roliths trapezes play a signi ant role (65-77%). Medium high

spe imens with a at retou h (Fig. 3:1-2; 4:1-7; 5:1-6, 10) should be stressed as

themaintype oftheNeolithi trapezes ofthemountainouspartof Crimea. They

di erin proportionsandsize ofthe atretou h.High symmetri andasymmetri

trapezeswith steep retou hhavealso beenregistered. Segmentsare notso

frequ-ent(23-25%). Nearly all thesegments are of medium heightand symmetri , with

predominan e ofspe imens witha atretou h(Fig.3:4-5, 31;4:9).Nevertheless,

segmentswithasteep retou harefrequent, espe iallyinlate inventories(Fig.3:4;

5:8).

S rapersare themost abundant groupof tools (29-41%of all theretou hed

artefa ts).Thereares rapers,mainlystraightones,that onstitutethepredominant

group(Fig.3:10,13,33-35;4:16,18-23,30-31;5:13-23).Doubles rapersares ar ely

represented(Fig.4:17;5:24).S rapersona akeo urintheshapeofmassive

semi--rounds rapers(Fig.3:16,38;4:24;5:29).Burinsdonotforma largegroup(10%)

andburinonsnapistheirmaintype(Fig.3:14,37;4:25-29;5:26).The hara teristi

featureof theTash-Air ultureassemblages are borers, whi h appearin relatively

largeamounts(6%)intheshapeofratherbigbladeswithasteepretou h(Fig.5:25,

27).Retou hedbladesarenumerous,whiletheotherformsofretou hedtoolso ur

ins antyamounts.

Boneandhornprodu tsserveaspoints,axes, knives,awlsandpinsframes.A

bonetoolfromTash-Air1(layer Va)[Kraynov1960℄seemsto beveryinteresting;

itdi ers from Mesolithi boneblades ofCrimea and an probablybe interpreted

as a tool of a spe i role. Horn frames are preserved mostly in parts; the only

ompletely preservedspe imen originatesfromZamil-Koba2. Itismadeofa split

boartusk[Kraynov1960:Table 13:5,7℄.

Pottery

A ording to the kind of admixture and ornamentation theTash-Air ulture

(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)

Zamil-Koba (layer6) [Kraynov1960:33-34℄,they are bla k ordark grey andhave

an admixture of nesand. All the fragmentsare non-ornamentaland ome from

vessel'sbodyex eptonepartofthebottom.

These ondgroup omprisesthepotteryfromTash-Air(layer5a),Zamil-Koba

(layer5)[Kraynov1960℄,Kaya-Arasy(lowerlayer),At-Bash,Balin-Kosh[Fomozov

1962℄andDenisovka[Sh hepinskiy1968℄(Fig.6:1-14).Theyaredarkred,brownor

dark brownfragmentswith arefully smoothedsurfa eandthey are partsofthi k

vessels with a ne admixture of rushed shells, limestone or quartz, ornamented

with omb de oration or in ised lines. These ome from slightly pro led vessels

withpointedbottoms,espe iallyspe imens foundatAt-BashandBalin-Kosh.The

losestanalogy anbefoundbetweenthatpotteryinSurska-Dnieper ulturevessel

forms[Danilenko1969:189;Telegin1971:6-7℄.

There ar fragments from Tash-Air (layer 5a) and Zamil-Koba (layer 5; Fig.

7:1-13)that onstitute thethird pottery group. These have their yellow or brown

surfa esmoothed.They ome fromthin,slightlyporousvessels withan admixture

of rushedshellsorlimestone.De orationofgeometri ompositionsismadewith

a long omb.The similarity to theSurska-Dnieperand theAzov-Dnieper ulture

potteryformsshouldalsobestressed[Danilenko1971℄.

Periodizationand hronology

Be ause of s ar e amounts of pottery the Tash-Air ulture periodization is

basedon intprodu tiondevelopment,withgeometri mi rolithsmorphologytaken

intospe ial onsideration. In reasing numberof trapezes with at retou h in the

Tash-Air assemblages allows establishing the relative hronology for sites of that

ulture.The role playedbypottery as adeterminant grows onlyin late phases of

theTash-Air ulture.

Threestages anbedistinguishedinthedevelopmentof theTash-Air ulture.

TheearliestisrepresentedbyTash-Airsite1(layer8and7)andZamil-Kobasite2

(layer8and7).The hara teristi featuresof inttoolsassemblagesare: atretou h

onabout 1/3 of mi roliths number and notvery large ores sizes. The

assembla-ges donot ontainpottery.Tash-Air1(layer6),Zamil-Koba2(layer 6),At-Bash,

Adzy-Koba2andothers representthese ond stage.Flatretou h isregistered for

almosthalf of mi roliths,single trapezes withsurfa e ompletely overedwith at

retou h also o ur. The feature of the greatest importan e for that stage is the

appearan e of pottery.There are Tash-Air 1 (layer 5a), Zamil-Koba 2 (layer 5),

Kaya-Arasy(lower layer), Buran-Kaya(layer 3), Denisovka and others that form

the third stage. Almost all of geometri mi roliths are overed with at retou h,

oresare massive.

(22)

Fig.7.Tash-Air1.Potteryfromlayer5a.

under dis ussion is given by 14

C dates of the se ond stage of the Murzak-Koba

ulture: for lower layer of Shpan-Koba 6240

±

150 BC

[Yanevi h 1993℄ and for

L aspi 7series from 5500

±

380to7150

±

130BC [Telegin 1982℄. Ontheground of ondu ted

14

C analysesit ispossibleto pla e tentativelytheTash-Air ultureover

aspanfromtheendofthe6thtothebeginning ofthe3rdmillennium BC.

(23)

4. MESOLITHICANDNEOLITHICECONOMYOFTHEMOUNTAINOUSAREA

OFCRIMEA

AforestanimalhuntingwasthebaseoftheMesolithi andNeolithi e onomy

of the area under dis ussion. The per entage of the forest animals rea hes 85%

of the osteologi al material of theShan-Koba ulture, 95% of the Murzak-Koba

ulture and 90% | the Tash-Air ulture. As hunting in limited zones was more

e e tive by meansof bows andarrows, it aused thesituationthatthey were the

mainequipment ofthe mountainousCrimeahunters. Dire t eviden e isprovided

by geometri mi roliths domination| used, as mentioned above, as arrowheads

at Shan-Koba and Tash-Air ultures. Judging from ethnographi al and histori al

analogies [Kroeber 1925; K uhn1952; Lin Jao Chua, Cheboksarov 1961; Mellaart

1967℄ followingmethods were pra tised: approa hing, hase, battue | in ase of

deer,approa hing whenhuntingroe-deer, battue|inboar hunting.

Ine onomyofthemountainousCrimeapopulationlandsnail(Helixalbestins)

olle tingwasofmainimportan e.Atnumeroussettlementstheirshellswerefound.

They onstitutedamain ontentofa ulturallayeratL aspi7[Telegin1982:90-92℄.

Colle ting plantswas obvious as well. Fishing was a omponent of e onomy but

regardings ar e shsour esinCrimea, itplayedase ond-raterole.Onlyat

Kara--Koba[Kolosov1960℄anabundan e of shbonewasfound.

Theannuale onomi y leofthemountainousCrimeapopulationwasdivided

intothetwo mainperiods: winter period in these ond mountainrangezone and

summer oneonplateaux.These y lesguaranteedthebestuseoffoodsupplies of

themountainarea. The se ond mountainrange area sites were usedonly in old

periods.About90%ofdeerandroedeer on entrateinoakforestsinwintertime.

Settlement of the se ond mountain range area is eviden ed by overing of bird,

boar, roe-deer skulls with their horns ut as well as remains of wandering sh

(Salmo trutta) in monthly y les in ultural layers in winter. Winter hara ter of

that settlement is shownby usage of abris with southor west exposition and by

reli sofbuildings|forinstan eatShan-KobaandZamil-KobaII[Bibikov1977℄.

Mesolithi andNeolithi settlementsarewithnodoubt onne tedwithsummer

periods|inallprobability|withsummermigrationsofwildanimalstosubalpine

meadowsandsteppes.Insummerthereare30%ofthemountainousareaon

plate-auxwhileinwinter,forthereasonthatthe overingofsnow,only5%.Boarbones

lying(inmonthly y les)atShan-Kobaaswellasthetopographyofthesettlements

indi ate the settlementonplateaux. They are situated in openareas, entirely not

shelteredfromthewinter winds,rea hing a speedof42m/se .

Thedevelopmentofgathering| huntinge onomyinthemountainousforest

of Crimea isdivided intothree stages. In the rst, theEarly Mesolithi stage the

e onomywasforming;itendedintheturnofHolo ene.These ond,L ateMesolithi

stage (Boreal andthebeginning ofAtlanti period)was a full bloomtime ofthat

(24)

bran hesofe onomy. Dis overiesof spe ialised tools(likeharpoons),and shers'

settlements (Kara-Koba) show an in reasing role of shing. An intensi ation of

e onomy led to stri tly de ned seasons | using natural sour es on plateaux in

summer andin these ondmountainrangeinwinter.

The thirdstage, theNeolithi one, in theAtlanti period,was a ontinuation

ofdes ribedtypeofe onomy.Asintheprevious ase,aforestanimalhuntingwas

ofthegreatest importan e.Theper entageofanimalshuntedthiswaywas70-80%

ofallanimals.Widespreadofbowsandarrowsisindi atedbynumerousgeometri

mi rolithsattheTash-Air ulturesites. Food-gathering,as wellas shing, wasstill

pra tised.Nevertheless, domesti animalsbones(espe iallypigs)werefoundatthe

Neolithi sitesofthemountainousCrimea[Kraynov1960℄.So,itwastheNeolithi

periodwhenanintegrationoftwotypesofe onomytookpla e,anditwasbreeding

thatplayedase ond-raterole.Thatstagewasaphaseof onsolidation|a ording

toM.Zvelebil[1986℄andhismodeloffarming|breedinge onomyformation.

5. SUMMARY

TheinvestigationsofthemountainousCrimeaNeolithi periodgivethepi ture

asfollows:

1.Thepro essofforminganddevelopmentofthemountainousCrimea ultures

had an auto htoni hara ter. The Neolithi has been formed here on the basis

of lo al L ate Mesolithi . Flintprodu tion is a ontinuation of the Murzak-Koba

ulture produ tion, and it also refers to the Neolithi bone and horntools. The

potteryshowsin uen esfromthenorth oastoftheBla kSea, espe iallyfromthe

SurskaandAzov ultures.

2.The typeofL ateMesolithi e onomywas thebase forthepro essof

Neo-lithization of the dis ussed part of Crimea. The Neolithi e onomy is a further

developmentofthee onomyoftheL ateMesolithi hunters,gatherers and shers

ofmountainforests.

(25)

AR { Ar heologi kerozhledy,Praha.

AP { Ar heologia Polski,Wro ªaw.

AJPA { Ameri anJournalofPhysi al Anthropology,NewYork.

CA { CurrentAnthropology,Chi ago.

KSIA { Kratkiye Soobsh heniya Instituta Arkheologii Akademii

NaukUSSR,Moskva.

KSIA(Ukraine) { Kratkiye Soobsh heniya Instituta Arkheologii Akademii

NaukUSSR,Kiev.

KSOGAM { KratkieSoobs heniyaOdesskogoGosudarstvennego

Arkhe-ologi heskogoMuzeya,Odessa.

MASP { Materialy po Arkheologii Severnogo Pri hernomorya,

Kiev.

MIA { Materialy iIssledovaniyapoArkheologii,Moskva.

SA { SovetskayaArkheologiya,Moskva.

SAA { SovetAnthropologyandAr haeology,Moskva.

SE { SovetskayaEtnogra ya, Moskva.

REFERENCES

AdovasioJ.M., So erO., Kl 

imaB.

1996 UpperPalaeolithi brete hnology:interla edwoven ndsfromPavlovI,

Cze hRepubli , .26,000yearsago. Antiquity70(269):526-534.

AlekseevV.P.

1969 ProiskhozhdeniyenarodovVosto hnoyEvropy.Moskva.

1974 ProiskhozhdeniyenarodovKavkaza.Moskva.

AlekseevV.P.,Mkrt hanR.

1989 Paleoantropologi heskiymaterializpogrebeniyvArmeniiivoprosy

gene-zisa kuro-arakskoykultury.SE1:127-134.

AlekseevaT.I.

1990 Antropologiya irkumbaltiyskogoekonomi heskogoregiona. In: R.J.

De-nisova(ed),Balty,slavyane,pribaltiyskiye nny,124-144.Riga.

AlekseevaT.I., E movaS.V.,ErenburgR.B.

1986 Kraniologi heskiyei osteologi heskiyekollektsiiInstituta i Muzeya

Antropo-logiiMGU.Moskva.

AlekshinB.A.

(26)

AlexanderJ.

1978 Frontierstudiesandtheearliest farmersin Europe.In:D. Green,C.

Ha-selgrove,M.Spriggs(eds),So ialOrganisationandsettlements.British

Ar- haeologi al Reports,International Series47:13-29.

AlsupeA.

1982 AudejiVidzeme19.gs. otrajapuseun20.gs. sakuma.Riga.

AmmermanA.J.,Cavalli-SforzaL.L.

1973 Apopulationmodel for thedi usion ofearly farming in Europe. In:C.

Renfrew(ed.), Theexplanationof ulture hange, 343-357.L ondon.

AndersenS.H.

1981 Ringkloster, en jysk inlands Boplandsmed. Ertebllekunst: Nyestjyske

fundaf mnsteredeErteblleoldsager.Kuml7-50.

AndersenS.Th.

1993 Earlyagri ulture.In:Diggingintothepast:25yearsofar haeologyin

Den-mark,88-95.Aarhus.

AndersonB.

1991 Imagined ommunities,revisededition.L ondon.

AnthonyD.W.

1994 Onsubsistan e hangeattheMesolithi -Neolithi Transition.CA35:49-50.

ArtsikhovskiyA.V.

1954 OsnovyArkheologii.Moskva.

ArutiunovS.A.

1983 Pro esses and regularities of the in orporation of innovations into the

ultureofanethnos.SAA21(4):3-28.

AulJ.

1935 Etude anthropologique des ossements humains neolithiques de Sope et

d'Ardu. In: Sitzungsberi hte der Gelehrten Estnis hen Gesells haft 1933,

224-282.Tartu.

1936 Anthropologis heFors hungeninEesti. Fenno-ugri a5:162-177.

1964 AntropologiyaEston ev.TR 

UToimetised158:387.Tallinn.

BaderO.N.

1940 Izu heniyeepipaleolitakrymskoyyaily. SA5:93-110.

1961 OsootnosheniikulturverkhnegopaleolitaimezolitaKrimaiKavkaza.SA

4:9-25.

1965 Varianty kulturyKavkaza kontsa verkhnego paleolita i mezolita. SA

4:3-28.

1978 Sungir,paleoliti heskayastoyanka.Moskva.

1984 Paleoliti heskiyepogrebeniyaipaleoantropologi heskiyenakhodkina

Sun-gire. In: A.A. Zubov, V.M. Kharitonov (eds), Sungir, antropologi heskoe

issledowaniye,6-13.Moskva.

(27)

Bagge A.

1951 Fagervik. Ein Ru kgrat fur die Periodeneinteilung der Ostswedis hen

Wohnplatz-undBootaxtkulturenausdemMittelneolithikum.A ta

Ar ha-eologi a22:57-134.

BagniewskiZ.

1993 Omezoli iePojezierzaDrawskiego.StudiaAr heologi zne(A ta

Universi-tatisWratislaviensis) 24:33-55.

BalakanS., NuzhnyiD.

1995 The origins of graveyards: thein uen e of lands ape elements onso ial

andideologi al hanges inprehistori ommunities. PrehistoireEuropenne

7:191-202.

BanksM.

1996 Ethni ity:anthropologi al onstru tions.L ondon.

Bar eldL.

1994 TheI eman reviewed.Antiquity68(258):10-26.

Bateman R.,GoddardI.,O'GradyR.,etal.

1990 Speakingofforkedtongues:thefeasibilityofre on ilinghumanphylogeny

andthehistoryoflanguage. CA31(1):1-24.

BaulinV.V.,DanilovaN.S.

1984 Dynami s of late Quaternary permafrost. In: A.A. Veli hko (ed.), Late

QuaternaryEnvironmentsoftheSovietUnion,69-86.Minneapolis.

Be kerC.J.

1950 Den grubekeramis heKulturiDenmark. Aarbger.

Be kman L.

1959 A ontributionto thePhysi al AnthropologyandPopulationGeneti s of

Sweden.Hereditas45:189.

BelanovskayaT.D.

1983 Rakushe hnoyarskayakulturavremenineolitaieneolitanaNizhnemDonu.

In: Problemykhronologiiarkheologi heskikhpamyatnikov stepnoy zony

Se-vernogoKavkaza,10-15.Rostovna Donu.

1995 IzdrevneyshegoproshlogoNizhnegoPodonya.Sankt-Petersburg.

BellwoodP.

1996 Phylogenyvsreti ulationinprehistory.Antiquity70:881-890.

BenevolenskayaY.D.

1990 Rasovyimikroevolyutsionnyeaspektykraniologiidrevnegonaseleniya

Severo--vosto hnoyEvropy.Balty,Slavyane,PribaltiyskiyeFinny.Riga.

Ben-Yehuda N.

1995 TheMasadaMyth:Colle tiveMemoryand MythmakinginIsrael. Madison.

BesuskoL.G.,Didu hJ.P., Yanevi hA.A.

(28)

BibikovS.N.

1940 GrotMurzak-Koba- Novayapozdnepaleoliti heskayastoyankavKrymu.

SA5:159-178.

1959 Nekotoryevoprosyzaseleniya vosto hnoyEvropy vepokhu paleolita.SA

4:2-28.

1966 Raskopkyvnavese Fatma-Koba inekotoriyevoprosyizu heniyamezolita

Krima.MIA126:138-143.

1977 Epokhamezolitu.In:IstoriyaUkrainskoyRSR,41-50.Kiev.

BibikovS.N.,StankoV.N.,KoenV.Y.

1994 Finalniy paleolitimezolitgornogoKrima. Odessa.

BibikovaV.I.

1975 O smene nekotorykhkomponentovfaunykopytnykhna Ukraine v

golo- ene.BuletenMoskovskogoObs hestvaIspitateleyPrirody80(6):67-72.

BinfordL.R.

1971 Mortuarypra ti es: theirstudyandtheirpotential.MemoirsoftheSo iety

forAmeri anAr haeology24:139-149.

1972 Anar haeologi alperspe tive.NewYork.

BodyanskiyO.V.

1959 Neoliti hnymogilnikbilyaNenasytetskogoporogu.Arkheologiya5:163-172.

Bon h-OsmolovskiyG.A.

1934 Itogiizu heniya Krymskogo paleolita.In: TrudyII Mezhdunarodnoy

Kon-ferentsiiAssotsiyapoIzu heniyuChetverti hnogoPeriodaEvropy,vol.5,

114--183.Moskva.

BoriskovskiyP.

1975 Mezoliti heskayastoyankaKazankablizKrivogoRoga.In:Pamyatniky

dre-vneysheyistoriiEvrazii, 55-62.Moskva.

BoriskovskiyP.I.,DmitrievaT.N.

1982a Kostenki2(Zamyatninastoyanka).In:N.D.Praslov,A.N.Roga hev(eds),

Paleolit Kostenkovsko-Borsh hevskogo rayona na Donu 1879-1979, 67-71.

Sankt-Petersburg.

Bromlei Y.V.

1973 Etnosietnogra ya.Moskva.

1974 EthnosandEndogamy.SAA13(1):55-69.

1983 O herkiteoriietnosa.Moskva.

BudjaM.

1997 L ands ape hangesintheNeolithi andCopperAgeinSlovenia.Case

stu-dies:theLjubljanskoBarje region. In:J.Chapman,P.Dolukhanov(eds),

Lands apesinFlux.CentralandEasternEuropeinAntiquity.Colloquia

Pon-ti a3.Oxford.

BukhmanA.I.

1984 Rentgeneologi heskoeissledovaniyeskeletovdeteys

(29)

an-Bulkin V.A.,KlejnL.S.,L ebedevG.S.

1982 Attainments and problems of SovietAr haeology. World Ar haeology 13

(3):272-295.

BunakV.V.

1956 Chelove heskiyerasyiputii hobrazovaniya.SE 1.

1980 RodHomo,egovozniknoveniyeiposleduyush hayaevolyutsiya.Moskva.

BurgioE.,Di PattiC.

1990 Ivertebratifossilidellagrottade SanTeodoro(A quedol i-Si ilia).

Natu-ralistasi il4,14(1-2):1-19.

ButrimasA.

1989 Mesolithi gravesfromSpiginas,Lithuenia.Mesolithi Mis ellany10:10-11.

CappieriM.

1973 TheIraniansoftheCopperand BronzeAges.Florida.

Cavalli-SforzaL.L.,EdwardsA.W.F.

1967 Phylogeneti analysis:Modelsandestimationpro edures.Evolution

32:550--570.

Cavalli-SforzaL.L.,MenozziP., Piazza A.

1994 Thehistoryandgeographyofhumangenes. Prin eton-NewJersey.

Cavalli-SforzaL.L.,Min hE.,MountainJ.L.

1992 Coevolutionof genesandlanguages revisited.Pro eedingsoftheNational

A ademyofS ien es oftheUnitedStatesofAmeri a89(12):5620-5624.

ChapmanJ.

1994 Theoriginsoffarminginsouth-eastEurope.PrehistoireEuropeenne

6:133--156.

ChernykhE.N.

1995 Posts ript: Russian Ar haeology after theCollapse of theUSSR -

infra-stru tural risisand theresurgen eofoldandnewnationalisms.In: P.L.

Kohl& C. Faw ett (eds),Nationalism,Politi s,and thePra ti e of

Ar ha-eology,139-148.Cambridge.

ChernyshA.P.

1975 StarodavnyenaselennyaPodnistrovyav dobumezolitu.Kiev.

ChildG.V.

1958 ThedawnofEuropean ivilization,sixthedition.NewYork.

ChmykhovN.A.

1990 Istokiyazy hestva Rusi.Kiev.

ClarkJ.G.D.

1958 Blade andtrapeze Industries ofEuropean StoneAge.Pro eedings of the

Prehistori So iety24(2):24-42.

Clarke D.L.

(30)

Clarke N.G.,Carey S.E.,SirikandiW.,Hirs hR.S.,L epperdP.I.

1986 Periodontaldisease inan ient populations.AJPA71:173-183.

Dahlberg A.A.

1956 Materials for the establishmentof standards for lassi ation of tooth

ha-ra ters,attributes, and te hniques in morphologi alstudies of the dentition.

Chi ago.

DanilenkoV.N.

1955a NeolitterritoriiUkrainskoySSR.Nau hniyArkhivInstitutaArkheologii

Na-tsionalnoyAkademiiNaukUkrainy 12:317.

1955b Voloshskiyepipaleolithi heskiymogilnik. SE3:56-61.

1969 NeolitUkrainy.Kiev.

1971 Sursko-dneprovskayakultura.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyRSR1,104-112.

Kiev.

1974 EneolitUkrainy.Kiev.

1986 Kamennaya Mogila.Kiev.

DanilovaE.J.

1971 Gematologi heskaya tipologiya i voprosy etnogeneza ukrainskogo naroda.

Kiev.

DavydovaG.M.

1974 Populyatsionno-geneti heskiye issledovaniya mansi. In: J.M. Zolotareva

(ed), Etnogenez nno-ugorskih narodov po dannym antropologii, 96-107.

Moskva.

DayM.

1986 GuidetoFossilMan. Chi ago.

DebetsG.F.

1936 Tardenuaski kostyak iz navesa Fatma-Koba v Krymu. Antropologi heskiy

Zhurnal 2:132-169.

1948 PaleoantropologiyaSSSR.TrudyInstitutaEtnographii(nov.ser.) 4:43-45.

1955a Cherepa izepipaleoliti heskogomogilnikaus. Voloshkoe.SE9:62-73.

1955b Paleoantropologi heskiyenakhodkivKostenkakh.SE1:43-53.

1955 Cherep iz pozdnepaleoliti heskogopogrebeniyav PokrovskimL oge

(Ko-stenkiXVIII).KratkieSoobsh heniyaInstitutaAntropologii82:120-127.

1961 Forty years ofSoviet Anthropology,IsraelProgram for S ienti

Transla-tions.PSTCat.No228[Originallypublished1957as:Sorokletsovetskoy

antropologii.SA1:7-30℄.

DebetsG.F., L evinM.G.,Tro movaT.A.

1952 Antropologi heskiy material kak isto hnik izu heniya voprosov

etnoge-neza.SE1:22-35.

Denisova R.Y.

1975 AntropologiyadrevnikhBaltov.Riga.

1986 Kultura shnurovoykeramiki Vosto hnoyPribaltiki i problema baltskogo

(31)

DennellR.

1985 Europeane onomi prehistory:anewapproa h.L ondon.

DerzhavinN.S.

1944 Proiskhozhdeniyerusskogonaroda.Moskva.

DobzhanskyT.

1962 Mankindevolving.Theevolutionofthehumanspe ies.NewHaven-L ondon.

DolukhanovP.

1989 Culturalandethni pro esses inprehistory asseen throughtheeviden e

ofar haeologyandrelateddis iplines.In:S.Shennan(ed.),Ar haeologi al

Approa hestoCulturalIdentity,267-277.L ondon.

1995 Ar haeologyinRussiaanditsimpa tonar haeologi altheory.In:P.U ko

(ed.),Theoryinar haeology:aworldperspe tive,342-372.L ondon.

1997 Cave versus open-air settlement in European Upper Palaeolithi . In: C.

Bonsall, C. Tolan-Smith(eds), TheHuman Useof Caves, Britis h

Ar ha-eologi alReports,InternationalSeries 667:9-13.Oxford.

DolukhanovP.,FonyakovD.I.

1984 Modelirovaniyekulturno-istori heskikhpro essov.In:Kompleksnyemetody

izu heniyaistoriis drevneyshikh vremyondonashikh dney,33-35.Moskva.

DolukhanovP.,GeyN.A.,Miklyaev A.M.,Mazurkevi h A.N.

1989 Rudnya-Serteya,a strati ed sitein the UpperDuna basin.Fennos andia

ar haeologi a6:23-26

DolukhanovP.,KhotinskiyN.A.

1984 Human ulturesandnaturalenvironmentsintheUSSRduringthe

Meso-lithi andNeolithi .In:A.A.Veli hko(ed.),LateQuaternaryEnvironments

oftheSoviet Union,319-327.Minneapolis.

DolukhanovP.,L evkovskayaG.M.

1971 IstoriyarrazvitiyaprirodnoysredyipervobytnikhkulturnavostokeL atvii

vgolotsene.In:Palinologiyagolotsena,53-62.Moskva.

DolukhanovP.,MiklyaevA.M.

1986 Prehistori pile dwellingsin thenorth-westernpart oftheUSSR.

Fenno-s andiaar haeologi a3:81-9.

Doma«skaL.

1990a Kaukasko-nad zarnomorskiewzor ekulturowewrozwoju

pó¹nomezoli-ty zny hspoªe ze«stwNi»u strefypograni za EuropyWs hodnieji

‘rod-kowej.In:A.Cofta-Broniewska(ed.),StudiaimateriaªydodziejówKujaw,

vol.5:6-70.Inowro ªaw.

1990b TheroleoftheNearEastfa torinthedevelopmentofthelateMesolithi

ommunitiesof theCentraland Easternpart oftheEuropean Plain. In:

P.M. Vermeers h & P. Van Peer (eds), Contributions tothe Mesolithi in

Europe,323-333.

1991 Obozowiskokultury janisªawi kiej w Dba h, woj. wªo ªawskie, stanowisko

(32)

1998 Theinitialstageoffood-produ tioninthePolishL owlands-TheDby29

Site.In:M. Zvelebil, R.Dennell, L.Doma«ska(eds), HarvestingtheSea,

FarmingtheForest,129-133.SheÆeld.

Dragadze T.

1980 Thepla e of'ethnos' theoryinSovietanthropology.In:E.Gellner(ed.),

SovietandWesternAnthropology,161-170.NewYork.

DubovA.I.

1990 Finno-ugorskayaodontologi heskayaobshtshnost.In:CongressusSeptimus

Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. Sessiones se tionum, dissertationes

histo-ri a,ar haeologi aetanthropologi a,221-225.Debre en.

DvoryaninovS.A.

1978 ODneprovskih mogilnikahkamennogoveka. In:Arkheologi heskiye

issle-dovaniyaSevero-ZapadnogoPri hernomorya.Kiev.

EberhardsG.Y.

1969 O nekotorykhosobennostyakh morfologiistroeniya i razvitiya relefa

Lu-banskoy ravniny v pozdnelednekovoe vremya. In: Voprosy hetverti hnoy

geologii,vol.4:59-63.Riga.

1981 KolebaniyaurovnyadrevnegoozeraLubanasizaseleniyeegoberegov

he-lovekom.In:Izotopnyeigeokhimi heskiyemetodyvbiologii,geologiii

arkhe-ologii.Tezesydokladovregionalnogosovesh haniya,182-186.Tartu.

1989 Novye dannye po geomorfologii poseleniy kamennogo veka Lubanskoy

niziny(mezolit,ranniyisredniyneolit).LatviyasZinatnuAkademijasVestis

2(499):74-85.

E menkoP.P.

1924 Melkiyekremneviyeorudiygeometri heskikhiini hsvoeobraznikh

o her-taniy w russkikhstoinka h ranneneoliti heskogo vosrasta. Russkiy

Antro-pologi heskiyZhurnal 3/4:211-228.

EriksonT.H.

1993 Ethni ityandnationalism:anthropologi alperspe tives.L ondon.

ErikssonA.V.,FrantsP.P.

1982 Issledovaniyagrupp kroviu komi-zyryanv SSSR.In:A.A. Zoubov,N.V.

Shlygina(eds),Finno-ugorskiysbornik(antropologiya,arkheologiya,

etnogra- ya),191-206.Moskva.

Eriksson A.V., Zolotareva I.M., Kozintsev A.G., Shev henko A.V., Eskola M.R.,

KirjarintaM., Partanen K.,FellmannJ.

1979 Geneti heskiye issledovaniya mariy ev ( heremisov). In: A.A. Zoubov

(ed.),Noviyeissledovaniyapoantropologiimariy ev,7-39.Moskva.

Europeus-

AyrapaaA.

1930 Die relative Chronologie der steinzeitli heKeramik in Finland.A ta

Ar- haeologi a1(2).

(33)

Feremba hD.

1973 L es Hommes du Bassin Mediterranean a l'epipaleolithique. In: Die

An-fangedesNeolithikums vomOrientbis Nordeuropa,t.VIIIa. Anthropologie,

t.1. K oln-Wien.

FlorinS.

1958 Vrakulturen. Stenalderboplatserna vid Mogetorp, 

Ostra Vra o h Brokvarn.

Sto kholm.

FormozovA.A.

1954 Periodizatsiya mezoliti heskikh stoyanok Evropeyskoy hasti SSSR. SA

21:38-51.

1959 Etnokulturniye oblasti na territorii Evropeyskoy hasti S S SR v kamennom

veke.Moskva.

1962 NeolitKrymaiChernomorskogopoberezhyaKavkaza.MIA102.

1965 KamenniyvekieneolitPrikubanya.Moskva.

1969 Ofaunepaleoliti heskikhpamyatnikovEvropeyskoy hastiSSSR.In:

Pri-rodairazvitiepervobytnogo heloveka,70-73.Moskva.

GabuniaL.K.,NioradzeM.G.,VekuaA.K.

1978 O musterskom heloveke iz Sakazhia (Zapadnaya Gruziya). Voprosy

An-tropologii59:154-164.

GaerteW.

1929 Urges hi hteOstpreussens. K onigsberg.

GalibinV.A.,TimofeevV.I.

1993 Thenewapproa htothere ognitionof thesour esof intraw material

forthestoneage ulturesoftheEasternBalti region.Ar haeologi alNews

2:13-17.Sankt-Petersburg(inRussian).

Gamkrelidze T.,IvanovV.

1984 IndoeuropeiskyyazikiIndoeuropeytsy,vol.2.Tbilisi.

GammermanA.F.

1934 Rezultaty izu heniya hetverti hnoy ory po uglyam In: Trudy

mezhdu-narodnoy konferentsii po izu heniyu hetverti hnogo perioda Evropy, vol.5,

68-73.Moskva-L eningrad.

GarrodG.A.E.,BateD.M.A.

1937 TheStoneAgeofMountCarmel.Vol.I:Ex avationsattheWadyel-Mughara.

Oxford.

GellnerE.

1977 Ethni ityandanthropologyintheSovietUnion.Ar hives Europeennesde

So iologie18(2):201-220.

GeningV.F.

1977 MogilnikSintashtaiproblemarannikhindoiranskikhplemen.SA3:53-73.

GeorgievV.I.

(34)

Gerasimov M.M.,RudN.M., YablonskiyL.T.

1987 Antropologiya anti hnogo i srednevekovogo naseleniya vosto hnoy Evropy.

Moskva.

GerasimovaM.M.

1982 Paleoantropologi heskiyenakhodki.In:N.D.Praslov,A.N.Roga hev(eds),

PaleolitKostenkovsko-Borsh hevskogorayonana Donu1879-1979,245-256.

Sankt-Petersburg.

1984 Kratkoeopisaniye herepaSungir5.In:A.A.ZubovandV.M.Kharitonov

(eds),Sungir,antropologi heskiyeissledovaniye,140-144.Moskva.

1987 Metri heskiye dannye o postkranialnom skelete helevekom iz

pogrebe-niya no verkhnepaleoliti heskoy stoyankeMarkina Gora. Voprosy

Antro-pologii78:21-29.

GeyA.N.

1983 Samsonovskoeposeleniye.In:DrevnostiDona,7-34.Moskva.

GinsburgV.V.,Tro movaT.A.

1972 PaleoantropologiyaSredneyAzii.Moskva.

GinterB.

1973 Remarksontheoriginofsomemesolithi ulturesinPoland.In:Mesolithi

inEurope,177-186.Warsaw.

GokhmanI.I.

1966 NaseleniyeUkrainyvepokhu mezolitaineolita.Moskva.

1984 Novye paleoantropologi heskiye nakhodki mezolita v Kargopole. In: I.I.

Gokhman(ed.),Problemyantropologiidrevnegoisovremennogonaseleniya

severaEvrazii, 6-26.Sankt-Petersburg.

1986 Antropologi heskiyeosobennostidrevnegonaseleniyaseveraEvropeyskoy

hastiSSSRiputii hformirovaniya.In:Antropologiyadrevnegoi

sovremen-nogonaseleniyaEvropeyskoy hastiS S SR.L eningrad.

GokhmanI.I.,KozintsevA.G.

1980 Sistemi heskoeopisaniyekollektsiiotdelaantropologiiMAE.Sbornik

Mu-seyaAntropologiiiEtnogra i35:182-222.

GokhmanI.I.,Lukian henkoT.V.,Khartanovi hV.I.

1976 Opogrebalnomobryadei kranologiiloparey.In: PoleviyeissledovaniyaIE

ANS S SR.Moskva.

GorelikA.

1984 Issledovaniyemezoliti heski hkompleksovstoyankiZimovniki1v

Severo-Vosto hnomPriazovye. SA2:117-132.

1987 Novye mezoliti heskiye pamyatniki s yanislavitskimy vkladishevimy

ele-mentamynaSeverskom Dontse.SA3:146-160.

GoretskiyG.I.

1955 O vozmozhnosti primeneniya ar heologi heskogo metoda pri izu henii

molodykhantropogenovykh oisadkov(v usloviyakh Nizhnego Pridonya i

(35)

21:58-GouldS.J.

1981 Themismeasureof man.NewYork.

GraudonisJ.

1967 Latviyavepokhupozdneybronzy irannegozheleza.Riga.

1989 No ietinatasapmetnesDaugavas leyte e.Riga.

GravereR.U.

1987 Etni heskayaodontologiyaLatyshey.Riga.

GreenS.,PerlmanS.

1985 Thear haeologyof frontiersandboundaries. NewYork.

GrigorievG.V.

1983 Pozdnepaleolit heskiyepamyatnikisgeometri heskimimikrolitamina

Rus-skoyravnine.KSIA173:55-61.

Gumi«skiW., Fiedor zukJ.

1988 Badania wDud e,woj.suwalskie,a niektóreproblemyepokikamienia w

Pols ePóªno no-Ws hodniej.AP33(1):113-150.

1990 DudkaI.AStoneAgepeat-bogsiteinNorth-EasternPoland.A ta

Ar ha-eologi a60:51-70.

GurinaN.N.

1956 OleneostrovskiyMogilnik. MIA47.

1989 MezolitKarelii.In:L.V. Koltsov(ed.), MezolitS S SR,27-30.Moskva.

Haeussler A.M.

1992a Thepla eoftheskeletonsfromSouthOleniyOstrovintheMesolithi and

earlyNeolithi worldoftheUSSR.AJPASupplement14:86 (abstra t).

1992b UpperPaleolithi teethfromtheKostenkisitesontheDonRiver,Russia.

Abstra tsNinth International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Floren e,

Italy,September1992(abstra t).Floren e.

1992 Middle and L ower Paleolithi teeth from the Cau asus Mountains.

Pro-gramand Bookof Abstra ts.3rdInternationalCongressonHuman

Paleon-tology,Journal oftheIsraelPrehistori So ietySupplementI:51(abstra t).

1994 Morphometri analysis of MousterianEra teethfrom theCau asus

Mo-untains,AJPASupplement18:99(abstra t).

1995a Origins and relationships of people buried in large Ukrainian

Mesoli-thi emeteries.Theeviden efromdentalmorphology.AJPASupplement

20:103(abstra t).

1995b DentalanthropologyoftheRussian Mesolithi Era:Oleneostrovskiy

Mo-gilnik.In:R.J.Radlanski,H.Renz(eds),Pro edingsofthe10th

Internatio-nalSymposiumonDentalMorphology,314-319.Berlin.

1995 UpperPaleolithi teethfromtheKostenkisitesontheDonRiver,Russia.

In:J.Moggi-Ce hi(ed.), Aspe tsofDentalBiology:Paleontology,

Anthro-pologyandEvolution, 315-332.Washington.

1996 Dental Anthropologyof Russia, Ukraine,Georgia, CentralAsia: Evaluation

(36)

Mi ro-1998 Originsandrelationships ofpeople buried in large Ukrainian Mesolithi

emeteries, theeviden e from dental morphology.In: J.R. Luka s (ed.),

HumanDentalDevelopment,Morphology,andPathology,ATributetoAlbert

A.Dahlberg.UniversityofOregonAnthropologi alPapers,54:79-117.

n.d.a. Middle andL ower Paleolithi teeth from theCau asus Mountains.

Sub-mittedtoH.DeLumley(ed.),Pro eedingsofthe3rdInternationalCongress

onHumanPaleontology(inprint).

n.d.b. Mesolithi CemeteriesofEasternCentralEurope:DentalMorphometri

Ana-lysis.Manus riptin progress(inprint).

Hanihara K.

1976 Statisti alandComparativeStudiesoftheAustralianAboriginalDentition.

Universityof TokyoMuseum Bulletin11.

HansenP.V., MadsenB.

1983 Flintaxemanufa ture intheNeolithi (Anexperimental investigation of

the intaxemanufa turesiteatHastrupUoenget,EastZealand).Journal

ofDanishAr haeology2:43-59.

HardingR.,SokalR.R.

1988 Classi ationoftheEuropeanlanguagefamiliesbygeneti distan e.Pro .

Natl.A ad.S i. USA85:9370-9372.

HarrisD.

1972 Swiddensystemsandsettlement.In:P.J.U ko,R.Thringham,G.W.

Dim-bleby(eds)Man, settlementand urbanism, 245-262.L ondon.

HarveyR.G.,TillsD.,WarlowA.,Kope A.C.,Domaniewska-Sob zakK.,SuterD.,

L ordJ.M.

1983 Geneti aÆnitiesoftheBalts.Astudyofbloodgroups,serumproteinsand

enzymesofLithuaniansin theUnitedKingdom.Man (N.S.)18:535-552.

HeapostL.

1993a A population-geneti hara terization of the Estonians. In: E. Iregren,

R.Liljekvist (eds),Populationsof theNordi ountries. Humanpopulation

biologyfromthepresent to theMesolithi ,Universityof Lund,Institute of

Ar haeology,ReportSeries No.46:216-225.

1993b Makita kalmistu antropoloogiline aines.In: V. L ang(ed.), Muinasaya

te-adus2,VadjaparasedkalmedEestis9-16sayandil,EestiTAAyalooInstituut,

233-248.Tallinn.

1994 Populatsioonigeneetilisedtunnusedeestlastel.In:K.Mark,L.Heapost,G.

Sarap(eds),Eestlasteantropoloogiaseosesetnogeneesik usimustega,110-196.

Tallinn.

1995 On raniology of South-EastEstonian populationin XI-XVII . Papers

onAnthropology6:57-69.Tartu.

(37)

HeetH.L.,DolinovaN.A.

1997 Dermatoglyphi diversity of the Finno-Ugrians. Papers on Anthropology

7:119-129.Tartu.

HillsonS.

1986 Teeth.Cambridge.

HobsbawmE.J.

1992 Nationsandnationalismsin e1780:programme,myth,reality,(2ndedition).

Cambridge.

HodderI.

1978 Simple orrelationsbetween material ulture andso iety:a review.In:I.

Hodder(ed.), Thespatialorganisationof ulture,3-24.L ondon.

1982 SymbolsinA tion.Cambridge.

1990 Thedomesti ationofEurope.Cambridge.

HornA.

1974 S ~ormemustritep ~ohit u upideesinemissagedusesteestlastel.TR 

UToimetised

330,67-90.Tartu.

HoweG.M.

1994 Thephysi alenvironment.Thenaturallands ape.In:A.Brown,M.Kaser,

G.S. Smith(eds), The CambridgeEn y lopedia of Russia and theFormer

SovietUnion,2-5.Cambridge.

HumphreyC.

1984 Somere entdevelopmentsinethnographyintheUSSR.Man19:310-320.

Hur ombeL.

1995 Ourownengenderedspe ies. Antiquity69(262):87-100.

Ilkiewi zI.

1989 From studies on ultures otthe 4thmillenium BC in the entral part of

thePolish oastalarea.Przegl¡dAr heologi zny36:17-55.

Illi h-Sviti hV.

1964 Drevneishiye indoeuropeisko-semitskiyeyazikovyekontakty.Problemy

in-doeuropeiskogoyazikoznania3:12.

IrishJ.D.

1993 Biologi alaÆnities of Late Pleisto ene through modernAfri an Aboriginal

populations. The dental eviden e. Ph.D. Dissertation. Arizona State

Uni-versity,Tempe,AZ.

Istoriko-etnogra heskiyatlas

1985 Istoriko-etnogra heskiyatlasPribaltiki:Zemledelie.Vilnius.

JaanitsL.

1985 Hat Estland im Neolithikum Verbindungen zu S hweden gehabt?. A ta

UniversitatisSto kholmiensis, StudiaBalti aSto kholmiensia1.

(38)

Ja obsK.

1993a Culturalandbiogeographi aspe tsofhuman post ranialvariationinthe

Mesolithi -Neolithi oftheUkraine. CA34:311-324.

1993b Human post ranial variation in the Ukrainian Mesolithi -Neolithi . CA

34:11-24.

1994a Human dento-gnathi metri variation in Mesolithi /Neolithi Ukraine:

Possible eviden e of demi infusionin theDnieper Rapids region. AJPA

95:1-26.

1994b Humanpopulationdi erentiationintheperi-Balti Mesolithi :the

odon-tometri sofOleneostrovskiyMogilnik.Human Evolution7(4):33-48.

1994 Reply.CA35:52-58.

Ja obsK., Pri e T.D.

1998 First radio arbon dates for two Ukrainian Mesolithi and Neolithi

e-meteries:Impli ation ofearlyHolo enehumanbiogeography.In:Eastern

Europe(inpress).

JanzonG.O.

1974 GotlandsMellanneolitiskagravar.Sto kholm.

JehlD.

1997 L ookwho'sstealingNabu hadnezar's thunder.NewYorkTimes2(June):

A4.

JonesS.

1997 TheAr haeologyofEthni ity:Constru tingIdentitiesinthePastandPresent.

L ondon:Routledge.

JonssonA.B.

1958 StenaldersboplatsenvidMartsbo.Tor4.

JorgensenS.

1985 TreefellingwithoriginalNeolithi intaxesinDravedWood(Reporton

theexperimentsin1952-54).In:G.L er he(ed.),IssueofNationalMuseum

ofDenmark,1-63.Copenhagen.

KariksJ.,BradleyM., WalshR.J.

1966 ThebloodgroupsofL atviansresidentinAustralia.VoxSanguinis

11:699--704.

KarklinsA.

1995 Starptautiskasaugsnuklasi ka ijas sistemas(FAOlegenda,Pasaulesaugsnu

klasi kators,SoilTaxonomy).Jelgava.

KaskA.

1956 Eesti murrete kujunemisest ja r uhmitumisest. In: H. Moora (ed.), Eesti

rahvaetnilisest ajaloost,24-40.Tallinn.

KempistyE.

(39)

Malinow-KharitonovV.M.

1990 Progress v issledovanii paleontropov otkrytykh na territorii Sovetskogo

Soyuza.In:Povedenniyeprimatovproblemyantropogeneza,88-100.Moskva.

Khartanovi hV.I.

1980 Noviyematerialy kkraniologiisaamovKolskogopolustrova.Sbornik

Mu-zeyaAntropologiiiEtnogra i36.

1986 Kraniologiya Karel. In:Antropologiya sovremennogoi drevnegonaseleniya

Evropeyskoy hastiS S SR.L eningrad.

1991 Ovzaimootnosheniiantropologi heskikhtipovsaamovikarel podannim

kraniologii. In:Proiskhozhdeniye saamov.Moskva.

1992 Kraniologiyakomi-ziryan.SbornikMuzeyaAntropologiiiEtnogra i44.

1993 Origin of the Balti -Finns on the bases of the raniologi al series. In:

Physi alanthropologyandpopulationgeneti sofVologdaRussians.Helsinki.

KhotinskyN.A., AlekshinskayaZ.V., KlimanovV.A.

1991 Novayaskhemaperyodizatsiilandshaftno-klimati heskikhizmeneniiv

go-lo ene.Izvestiya ANS S SR,Ser.Geograf.,3:30-42

KhrisanfovaE.N.

1984 Postkranialnyyskeletvzroslogomuzh hinySungir1.Bedrennayakost

Sun-gir4. In:A.A. Zubov,V.M.Kharitonov(eds), Sungir,antropologi heskiye

issledovaniye,140-144.Moskva.

KernerV.F.

1991 PoseleniyeIsetskoe pravoberezhnoe.In:Neoliti heskiyepamyatnikiUrala,

46-67.Sverdlovsk.

KiyashkoV.Y.

1987 MnogosloynoeposeleniyeRazdorskoe1naNizhnemDonu.KSIA

192:73--80.

KiyatkinaT.P.

1987 Paleoantropologiyazapadnykhrayonov TsentralnoyAzii epokhi bronzy.

Du-shanbe.

KlejnR.G.,Ivanova I.K.,Debets G.F.

1971 U.S.S.R.In:K.P. Oakley,B.G.Campbell, T.I.Molleson(eds), Catalogof

FossilHominidsPartII:Europe,313-335.L ondon.

KohlP.L.

1992 Ethni strife:Ane essaryamendmenttoa onsiderationof lassstruggles

inantiquity.In:C.W.Gailey(ed.),Civilizationin risis:Anthropologi al

per-spe tives(EssaysinhonorofStanleyDiamond),vol.1,167-179.Gainesville.

1996 L'Armenieavantle hristianisme:sonemergen eetsonevolutionjusqu'au

d ebut duIVe sie le apres J.-C. In: J. Santrot (ed), Armenie:Tresors de

l'ArmenieAn ienne,18-25.Paris.

KohlP.L.,TsetskhladzeG.R.

1995 Nationalism,politi s, andthepra ti e ofar haeologyin the au asus. In:

(40)

KolosovY.

1960 Raskopkypesh hery Kara-KobavKrymu.KSIA(Ukraine)10:17-22.

1971 NeolitKrymu.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,vol.1:129-137.

KoltsovL.

1977 Finalny paleolitimezolityuzhnoyivosto hnoyPribaltiky.Moskva.

KonduktorovaT.S.

1957 Paleoantropologi heskiyematerialy iz mezoliti heskogomogilnika V

asily-evkaI.SA2:189-210.

1973 AntropologiyanaseleniyaUkrainymezolita,neolita,iepokhibronzy.Moskva.

1974 TheAn ientPopulationof theUkraine.Anthropologie12(1-2):5-204.

KorenevskiyS.N.

1992 Onthedis ussionoftheethni interpretationoftheMaikopCulture.SAA

30(3):39-47.

KorobkovaG.F.

1987 Khozyaystvennyekompleksyrannikhzemledel hesko-skotovod heskikh

obsh- hestvyugaS S SR.L eningrad.

KosarevM.F.

1965 OkulturakhandronovskogovremenivzapadnoySibiri.SA2:242-246.

KossinnaG.

1911 DieHerkunft derGermanen.W urzburg.

KotovaN.S.

1990 PokhovalniyobryadMaryupolskogomogilnika.Ar heologiya3:48-56.

1994 Mariupolskayakulturno-istori heskayaoblast(Dnepro-Donskoe

Mezhdu-re hiye). In: Arkheologi hni pamyatki ta istoriya starodavnogo naselennya

Ukrainy,Vip.1, 1-143.Lutsk.

KotovaN.S.,TuboltsevO.V.

1996 NewsettlementsoftheNeolithi -Eneolithi periodat Melitopol.Eurasia

Antiqua2:29-58.

KovalevaV.T.

1995 Problema etni heskoy identi katsii naseleniya tashkovakoy kultury. In:

G.B. Zdanovi h, N.O. Ivanova, A.D. Tairov (eds), Kultury drevnikh

na-rodovstepnoyEvraziiifenomen protogorodskoytsivilizatsiiyuzhnogoUrala,

69-72.Chelyabinsk.

1963 Orasprostranennostikremnyana territoriiEvropeyskoy hastiSSSR.In:

S.I. Rudenko (ed.), Novye Metody v Arkheologi heskikh Issledovaniyakh,

234-240.Moskva.

KozªowskiS.K.

1965 Zproblematykipolskiegomezolitu. AP10(1):151-177.

1988 ThePre-neolithi baseoftheEarlyNeolithi StoneinEurope.

Ar haeolo-giaInterregionalis9:9-18.

(41)

KraynovD.A.

1938 O het o raskopka h Zamil - Koba II. Arkhiv Leningradskogo Otdeleniya

InstitutaMateryalnoyKultury,5-24.L eningrad.

1960 Pe hernayastoyankaTash-AirIkakosnovaperiodisatsii

poslepaleoliti he-ski hkulturKrima.MIA91:1-187.

1972 DrevneyshayaistoriyaVolgo-OkskogoMezhdere hiya.Fatyanovskayakultura.

IItisya heletiyedon.e.Moskva.

KremenetskyK.

1991 Paleologiyadrevneishikhzemledelt eviskotovodovRusskoyravniny.Moskva.

KrizhevskayaL.Y.

1974 K voprosu o formakhkhozyaystvaneoliti heskogo naseleniya v

severno--vosto hnomPriazovye.In:Pervobytniy helovekiprirodnayasreda,263-68.

Moskva.

KroeberA.L.

1925 HandbookofIndiansofCalifornia.In: BureauofAmeri anEthnology78,

601.WashingtonD.C.

KrotovaA.A.

1985 PozdniypaleolitSeverskogoDontsaiPriasovya.Avtoreferatkand.diss.Kiev

KrutsS.I.

1972 Dopaleoantropologiikemi-obynskoykultury.MaterialysAntropologii

Ukra-iny6:28-36.

KukawkaS.

1987 Elementypóªno no-ws hodniewrozwojuspoªe ze«stw kulturypu harów

lejkowaty hnaziemi heªmi«skiej.In:T. Wi±la«ski(ed.),Neolitipo z¡tki

epokibr¡zuna ziemi heªmi«skiej,141-166.Toru«.

1991 Kulturapu harówlejkowaty hnaziemi heªmi«skiej.Toru«.

KuzminaE.E.

1981 Proiskhozhdeniye Indoirantsev v svete noveyshikh arkheologi heskikh

otkrytiy. In: M.S. Asomov, B.A. Litvinsky, L.I. Miroshnikov, D.S.

Ray-evsky(eds),Ethni problemsofthehistoryofCentralAsiaintheearlyperiod

(se ondmillenniumB.C.),101-125.Moskva.

1994 OtkudaprishliIndoarii?Moskva.

K uhnH.

1952 DieFelsbilderEuropa.Stuttgart.

L arssonM.

1985 TheEarlyNeolithi Funnel-BeakerCultureinsouth-westS ania,Sweden.

So- ialande onomi hange3000-2500B C,BritishAr haeologi alReports,

InternationalSeries264.Oxford.

L aulS.

(42)

Ema-L eakeyL.S.B.

1935 Thestoneagera esofKenya.L ondon.

L ebedinskayaG.B.,SurninaT.S.

1984 Portrety detey pogrebennykh na stoyanke Sungir (plasti heskaya

rekon-struktsiya).In:A.A. ZubovandV.M.Kharitonov(eds),Sungir,

antropolo-gi heskiyeissledovaniye,156-162.Moskva.

L evitskiyI.F.

1949 Roskopkipaleoliti hnoistoyankinaBaltsiOsokoroviyv1946r.

Arkheolo-gi hnyPamyatky2:289-291

LigersZ.

1952 Latviesuetnogra ya,vol.1.Bayrux.

LigiP.

1993 National romanti ism inar haeology: theparadigmof Siavoni

olonisa-tioninNorth-WestRussia.Fennos andiaar haeologi a10:31-39.

1994 A tiveSlavsandpassiveFinns:areply.Fennos andiaar haeologi a

11:104--112.

1995 So ialsystemsinEstoniaduringtheL ateBronzeandIronAges.Muinasaja

teadus3:262-270.

LiivaA.,L oze,I.

1988 Radiouglerodnoe datirovaniye rannego neolita v Vosto hnoy Pribaltike.

In:Izotopno-geokhimi heskiyeissledovaniyavPribaltikeiBelorussii,106-116.

Tallinn.

LinJaoChua,CheboksarovN.N.

1961 Khozyaistvenno-kulturnyetipyKitaya.TrudyInstitutaEtnogra i73:5-161.

LindstromR.W.

1994 Ar haeologyof theIndo-Iranianmigration hypothesis:Population

move-ment and ulture hange in the southern Zaural. Paper presented at the

93rdannualmeetingof theAmeri anAnthropologi alAsso iation.Atlanta.

1996 Linguisti expansion,ethnogeneti modelsand ulture hangeinthe

Bron-zeAgeoftheSouthernZaural.Paperpresentedatthe95thannualmeeting

oftheAmeri an Anthropologi alAsso iation.SanFran is o.

LitvinskiyB.A.

1981 Problemyetni heskoyistoriiSredneyAziivIItysia hiletiidon.e.In:M.S.

Asomov, B.A. Litvinskiy, L.I. Miroshnikov, D.S. Rayevsky (eds), Ethni

problemsofthehistoryofCentralAsiaintheearlyperiod(se ondmillennium

B.C.),154-166.Mos ow.

L ordkipanidzeO.D.

1989 NasledieDrevneyGruzii. Tbilisi.

L ozeI.

1974 1973.GadapetiyumiSmaudzuarkheologiskayakompleksa.In:Zinatniskas

(43)

1978 Neolita eltnuvietasAustrumbaltiya.ArkheologiyaunEtnogra ya12:7-23.

1979 PozdniyneolitiranyayabronzaLubanskoyravniny.Riga.

1980 Voprosykartogra rovaniyanakhodokyantaryaepokhineolitana

Evropey-skoy hastiSSSR.Izvestiya AkademiiNaukLatviyskoyS SR9(398):73-86.

1988a PoseleniyakamennogovekaLubanskoyniziny.Mezolit,ranniyisredniyneolit.

Riga.

1988b Stone Age woodentools and devi es from themultilayer habitation site

ofZvidze(L atvia). AR11:361-377,473-476.

1993a Arheologiskiye petiyumi I as neolita apmetne. Latviyas Vestures Instituta

Zhurnals1:9-21.

1993b Dzintara atsleggalvas piekarini Austrumbaltija un to kulturas piederiba.

LatviyasZinatnuAkademiyasVestis7:32-38.

1993 Versa simbolsarheologiya. Zvaigznotadebess3:18-21.

1994a Menesssimbolssenayasrotas.Zvaigznotadebess1:54-57.

1994b Saulessimbolssenajas rotasunornamentika.Zvaigznota debess2:53-57.

1995a L ateNeolithi burialpra ti es andbeliefsinL atvia.In:Ar haeologia

Bal-ti a,33-42.Vilnius.

1995b Lubanaezeraieplakasakmenslaikmetaapmetnesuntoiedzivotajuiztikas

ekonomika.LatviyasVesturesInstitutaZhurnals 2:11-32.

1998a Theeastern Balti StoneAge amberroutes.Forli(inprint).

1998b TheNeolithi dwellingandwoodenimplementsattheZvidzesettlement,

LubanaL ake depression.Sergiyev Posad(inprint).

L ozeI.A.,EberhardsG.Y.

1983 Osnovnyeetapyrazvitiya iosadkonakopleniyaozeraLubanas vgolotsene

(Vosto hnayaL atviya).In:IstoriyaozervS S SR.TezesydokladovVI

Vsesoy-uznogosovesh haniya 2,116-117.Tallinn.

L ozeI.A.,LiivaA.A.,StelleV.Y.,EberhardsG.Y.,YakubovskayaI.

1984 Zvidze-mnogosloynoeposeleniyeepokhmezolitaineolitanaLubanskoy

nizine(L atviyskayaSSR).In:Arheologiyaipaleogeogra yamezolitaineolita

Russkoyravniny,40-55.Moskva.

L ozeI.,VasksA.

1974 Izrakumi Brikulu apmetne. In: Zinatniskas atskaites sesiyas materiali par

arheologu,antropologuunetnografupetiyumiem1973gada,48-50.Riga.

L ozeI.A.,YakubovskayaI.

1984 Florapamyatnikov kamennogo veka Lubanskoy niziny. Latviyas Zinatnu

AkademiyasVestis5(442):85-94.

Luka sJ.R.,Hemphill B.E.

1992 DentalAnthropology.HumanSkeletalRemainsfromMahadaha:A

Gan-geti Mesolithi Site.SouthAsiaO asionalPapersandTheses11:157-270.

LyubinV.P.

(44)

1989 Paleolit Kavkaza. In: P.I. Boriskovskiy (ed.), Paleolit Kavkaza i Severnoy

Azii,9-144.Moskva.

LyubinV.P., AutlaevP.U., AmirkhanovKh.A.

1977 Raskopki paleoliti heskikh stoyanok v kanyone reki Gubs v Prikubane.

Arkheologi heskieOtkrytiya1976.Moskva.

LyubinV.P., AutlaevP.U., ZubovA.A.,RomonovaG.P., KharitonovV.M.

1986 OtkrytkeskeletnykhostatkovpaleoantropanaBarakaevskoystoyanke

(Za-padnyKavkaz). VoprosyAntropologii77:60-70.

MadsenB.

1984 Flintaxemanufa tureintheNeolithi :experimentswithgrindingand

po-lishingofthethin-butted intaxes.JournalofDanishAr haeology3:47-62.

MadsenD.B.,RhodeD.(eds)

1994 A ross the West: Human population movement and the expansion of the

Numa. SaltL akeCity.

MakarenkoN.

1933 Mariupilskiymogilnik.Kiev.

MalinaJ.,Vas 

i ekZ.

1990 Ar haeologyyesterdayand today.Cambridge.

MalloryJ.P.

1989 Insear hof theIndo-Europeans.L ondon.

Malmer M.P.

1962 Jungneolitis hestudien. A taAr haeologi aLundensia 8(2).

1969 GropkeramiksbopladsenJonstorpRa.Sto kholm.

MamonovA.E.

1994 Elshanskiy komplex stoyanki Chekalino IV.In: Drevniye kultury

lesostep-negoPovolzhya,3-25.

MamonovaN.N.,Bazaliyskiy V.I.

1991 Mogilnik"L okomotiv".Nekotoryebiologi heskiyeidemogra heskiye

oso-bennostinaseleniyakitoyskiykultury(pomaterialam raskopok1980-1984

godov).In:G.I.Medvedev(ed.),Paleoetnologi heskiyeissledovaniyanayuge

SredneySibiri.Irkutsk.

MamonovaN.N.,SulerzhitskiyL.D.

1977 Mezolitineolitvosto hnogoKryma.Kiev.

1989 Opyt datirovaniya po 14C pogrebenii Pribaykalya epokhi golotsena. SA

1:19-32.

MarkK.

1994 Eestlastesomatoloogia.In:K.Mark,L.Heapost,G.Sarap(eds),Eestlaste

antropoloogiaseosesetnogeneesik usimustega, 15-74.Tallinn.

MarkovinV.I.

1990 Spornyevoprosyvetnogenti heskomizu heniidrevnosteiSevernogo

(45)

Di-(The Maikop Culture). In: M.M. Balzer (ed.), Turmoil in the Northern

Cau asus: TheMaikopAr haeology Debate.Soviet Anthropologyand

Ar- heology,W inter1991-92,vol.30,no.3℄.

1994 Sovremennyeproblemyvizu heniietni heskoyistoriiSevernogoKavkaza.

Rossiyskaya Arkheologiya1:51-66.

MathiassenT.

1948 DanskeOldsagerI.Kbenhaven.

MatskevoyL.G.

1977 MezolitineolitVosto hnogoKryma.Kiev.

MatskevoyL.G.,G.A.Pashkevi h

1973 Kpaleogeogra iker henskogopoluostrovavremenimezolitaineolita.SA

2:123-137.

Maviglia C.

1941 S heletriumanidelPaleolitosuperiorerenvenutinellagrottadiS.Teodoro

(ME).Ar haeologyAnthropologyEthnology70:94-194.

MayL arry

1989 Philosophersandpoliti al responsibility[re: theHeidegger a air℄. So ial

Resear h 56(4):877-901.

M GowanT.D.,KeithA.

1939 TheStoneAgeofMountCarmel,Vol.II,Thefossilhumanremainsfromthe

Levalloiso-Mousterian.Oxford.

MeikeljohnC.,BaldwinJ.H.,S hentagC.T.

1988 Caries asaprobabledietary markerinthewesternEuropeanMesolithi .

In:B.V.Kennedy,G.M.L eMoine(eds),DietandSubsisten e: Current

Ar- haeologi al Perspe tives. Pro eedings of the Nineteenth Annual

Confe-ren e,273-279.Calgary.

Mellaart J.

1967 TheNeolithi oftheNearEast.L ondon.

MezalsG., SkujansR.,FreivaldsV.,Bambergs K.

1970 AugsneszinatneunLatviyas PSRaugsnes.Riga.

MiklyaevA.M.

1995 Kamennyizheleznyvekvmezhdure hyeZapadnoiDvinyiL ovati.

Peter-burgskiyArkheologi heskiyVestnik9:7-39

Mikuli hA.I.

1989 Genogeogra yaselskogonaseleniya Belorussii.Minsk

Moiseev A.A.

1918 O heto predvaritelny hissledovaniya h kamennogoveka v Krymu.

Izve-stiyaRusskogoGeogra heskogoObsh hestva16:106-116.

(46)

MooraH.

1957 Einesteinzeitli heS hlangen gurausderGegendvonNarva,Suomen

Mu-inasimuistoyhdistyksenAikakavskirja/FinskaFrnminnes-ForeningensTidskrift

58:224-232.

MooreJ.H.

1994a Ethnogeneti theory.NationalGeographi Resear h&Exploration10

(1):10--23.

1994b Putting anthropology ba k together again: the ethnogeneti ritique of

ladisti theory.Ameri anAnthropologist96:925-48.

MourantA.E.,Kope A.C.,Domaniewska-Sob zakK.

1976 Thedistribution of thehuman bloodgroups and otherpolymorphisms,2nd

edition.L ondon.

MurumetsS.

1982 Eesti keeleala murdelisestliigendusest "Vaikese murdes ~onastiku"p ~ohjal.

I.KeeljaKirjandus1:11-17.

1983 Eesti keeleala murdelisestliigendusest "Vaikese murdes ~onastiku"p ~ohjal.

I.KeeljaKirjandus11:615-623.

NevanlinnaH.R.

1973 Suomen vaestorakenne. Geneetinen ja genealoginen tutkimus, Vammalan

KirjapainoOY.Vammala.

NielsenP.O.

1977 Detyknakkede intokserskronologi.Aarbger5-67.

NikityukB.A., KharitonovV.M.

1984 Postkranialnyeskeletdeteysverkhnepaleoliti heskoystoyankeSungir.In:

A.A. Zubov andV.M. Kharitonov(eds), Sungir, antropologi heskoe

issle-dovaniye,182-202.Moskva.

NioradzeG.K.

1933 Paleoliti heskiyChelovekizPesh heriDevis-Khvreli.TrudyMuzeyaGruzii,

vol.6. Tbilisi.

NioradzeM.G.

1976 Arkheologi heskiyerabotyvpesh hereSakazhia.Soobsh heniyaAkademii

NaukGruzinskoy S S SR84:1.

NioradzeM.G.,Sh helinskiyV.E.

1990 Trasologo-funktsionalnoeizu heniye kamennykh izdelii pervogo

Muster-skogo sloya pesh hera Sakazhia (zapadnaya Gruziya). In: D.M. T

usha-bramishvili (ed.), Paleolit Kavkaza i sopredelnikh territorii. Sbornik

posvy-ash hennyy100-letiyuso dnyarozhdeniya hlen-korr.ANGS SR,Prof.G.K.

Nioradze,60-73.Tbilisi.

NomalsP.

1943 VidzemesunLatgalespurvuapskats.Riga.

(47)

armatures de proje tiles, Bulletin de la So ietePrehistorique Fran aise 86

(3):88-96.

1990 Proje tiledamageonUpperPalaeolithi mi rolithsandtheuseofbowand

arrow among Pleisto ene huntersin the Ukraine. In: K. Knutsson(ed.),

Pro eedings of theInternational Conferen e of Lithi Use-WearAnalysis in

Uppsala,Sweden,113-124.Uppsala.

1992 Rozvitokmikroliti hnoytekhnikivkamyanomuvitsy.Kiev.

1997 Problemasezonnoyadapta yi nalnopaleolity hnykhmysliv ivna

mamon-tivSerednogoPodniprovyainoviepigravetskipamyatkiubaseyniTrubezy.

Arkheologiya2:3-23.

NuzhnyiD., Yanevi hA.

1987 Okhozyastvennoyinterpretatsiipamyatnikovkukrekskoykulturnoy

tradit-sii.KSIA189:38-41.

OlenkovskiyN.P.

1991 PosdniypaleolitimesolitNizhnegoDnepra.Kherson.

OlkhovskiyV.S.

1992 Obarkheologi heskikhsledovmigratsiivbronzovomirannemzheleznom

veke. In: Z.S. Samashev, V.S. Olkhovskiy, E.A. Smagulov, et al. (eds),

Margulanovskiye hteniya(1990),30-32.Alma-Ata.

OshibkinaS.V.

1982 Mezoliti heskiymogilnik"Popovo"nar. Kineme.SA3:122-138.

1983 MezolitBasseynaSukhonyiVosto hnogoPrionezhya. Moskva.

1989 Mezolittsentralnykhisevero-zapadnykhraynovSeveraEvropeyskoy hasti

SSSR.In:L.V. Koltsov(ed.),MezolitS S SR,32-45.Moskva.

Pashkevi hG.A.

1982 Paleobotani heskaya kharakteristika poseleniya Mirnoe. In: V.N. Stanko

(ed.),Mirnoe,132-139.Kiev.

Paunes u A.

1970 Ewolutiauntelorarmelordepiatra ioplitades operitapeteritoriulRomanien.

Bu uresti.

1988 L esindustrieslithiquesduNeolithquean iendelaRonmanieetquelques

onsiderationssurI'inventairelithiiguedes ulturesduNeolithiquemoyen

de etle ontree.Ar haeologiaInterregionalis, 75-94.Warsaw.

Perles C.

1988 L esindustriesduNeolithique"pre eramique"deGre e:nouvellesetudes,

nouvellesinterpretations.Ar haeologiaInterregionalis,19-40.Warsaw.

PetrequinA.M., PetrequinP.

1988 LeNeolithiquedesla s.Prehistoredesla sdeChalainetdeClairvaux(4000

-2000av.J.-C.). Paris.

PiggottS.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Fig. Stan zachowania nie jest dobry, gdyż brak blisko połowy kołnierza i dolnej części naczynia; dno natomiast zachowało się całkowicie. Kołnierz tej misy składa się z

This was the reference to the interference in the internal affairs of Ukraine, by supporting anti-Russian color revolutions (Lanteigne, 2016). The Western powers tried

The dinocyst assemblage of beds with Phoberocysta neocomica of the Crimea has nine species in common with the dinocyst Dichadogonyaulax bensonii Zone of the French

In the section studied (Fig. 1) the lower levels of argilla- ceous deposits (Member 5) are absolutely dominated by the genera Costacythere and Schuleridea Swartz et Swain, 1946

The results of magnetostratigraphic investigations in the upper Berriasian zavodskaya Balka section (Feodosiya, Crimea) are presented: magnetic polarity information, data on

Wspomniano już wcześniej, że z pojęciem patria potestas łączył się również obowiązek alimentacyjny ojca wobec swoich dzieci.. Pojęcie to ma swój

K rynickiego „W ymowy św iętej” 31 ja ­ ko podręcznika dla sem inariów pow strzym ało Nassalskiego1 przed publikow aniem dalszych artyku łów z histo rii

유역의 특징을 분석하기 위해 GIS 기법을 이용하여 지형 공간자료를 구축하였으며, 재해 발생 이후의 지형자료 구축을 위하여 지상 LiDAR 를 활용하여 토석류 발생 구간을