A general activity-based methodology for
simulating multimodal transportation
networks during emergencies
Jeroen P.T. van der Gun, Adam J. Pel, Bart van Arem
3rd International Conference on Evacuation Modeling and Management
Introduction
Urban emergencies
Observed characteristics (one or more):
• Presence of evacuation traffic
• Substantial delays for everyday traffic
• Emergency services trying to reach the disaster site Urban transportation system is easily overloaded
• Less supply and/or more demand
Main model requirements
• Be dynamic
• Predict initial conditions
• Include intra-household interactions
• Be multimodal
• Include not directly affected travellers
Travel choice modelling
Activity-based choice model for household
Normal
• Follow activity-travel pattern from equilibrium situation • Initial state of all households
Adaptation
• Adapt to experienced or anticipated delays
• Ranges from switching routes to rescheduling everything
Evacuation
• Danger is perceived and acted upon
Network simulation
• Dynamic
• Multimodal
• Macroscopic or mesoscopic
• Integrated with choice model Use commodities to:
• Track individuals
• Handle en-route choices
• Incorporate public transport
• Incorporate emergency services
Linking the model components
Serial and parallel procedures
Simulated time
Network loading
Choice (fraction of households) No choice (other households)
Network loading Choice
Simulated time
Serial procedure
Normal day
Find the equilibrium
Parallel procedure
Disaster scenario
Parallel procedure in detail
Network loading
for some time step, e.g. 1 min
Choice
for each household
Control
Locations of household members/vehicles Immediate
departure and route choices
Travel times and other information Network status Traffic control, emergency services Disaster plan Household memory (activity-travel schedules, received information) Household characteristics and
Evacuation conditions
• Inhabitants of Delft start evacuating between 16:00 and 17:30
• Must travel home prior to evacuating – and then leave together as
household
• Car used if available, otherwise public transport or walking
• Route choices continuously updated based on prevailing travel times
• Other people follow normal travel patterns
• Trains/trams/buses remain in normal operation
Simulation output
Conclusions
• New flexible and efficient model structure
• Practical case study insights
• Significant interaction of inbound, outbound and background traffic • Significant interaction between modes
• Spare public transport capacity may be available