FEM for continuum statics
Piotr Pluciński e-mail: pplucin@L5.pk.edu.pl
Jerzy Pamin
e-mail: jpamin@L5.pk.edu.pl
2 FEM discretization
3 Plane stress
4 Example
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium state
Y Z
X
S
n t
u(x, y, z) ρb(x, y, z)
P
P 0 V
Body force density vector [N/m 3 ]
ρb = ρ
0 0
−g
Traction vector [N/m 2 ]
t =
t x
t y t z
Equilibrium state
Y Z
X
S
n t
u(x, y, z) ρb(x, y, z)
P
P 0 V
Body force density vector [N/m 3 ]
ρb = ρ
0 0
−g
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium state
Y Z
X
S
n t
u(x, y, z) ρb(x, y, z)
P
P 0 V
Body force density vector [N/m 3 ]
ρb = ρ
0 0
−g
Traction vector [N/m 2 ]
t =
t x
t
Equilibrium state
Y Z
X
S
n t
u(x, y, z) ρb(x, y, z)
P
P 0 V
Equilibrium equations for a body Z
S
tdS + Z
V
ρbdV = 0
Z
S
σndS = Z
V
L T σdV where L – differential operator matrix
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium state
Y Z
X
S
n t
u(x, y, z) ρb(x, y, z)
P
P 0 V
Equilibrium equations for a body Z
S
tdS + Z
V
ρbdV = 0
Static boundary conditions t = σn
where σ – stress tensor (in Voigt’s notation)
Using Green–Gauss–Ostrogradsky theorem Z
S
σndS = Z
V
L T σdV where L – differential operator matrix
Y Z
X
n u(x, y, z)
ρb(x, y, z)
P 0 V
S V
Static boundary conditions t = σn
where σ – stress tensor (in Voigt’s notation)
Using Green–Gauss–Ostrogradsky theorem Z
S
σndS = Z
V
L T σdV where L – differential operator matrix
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equations
Navier’s equations Z
V
L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ⇐⇒L T σ + ρb = 0 ∀P ∈ V
σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
Weak formulation – weighting function w ≡ δu – kinematically admissible displacement variation
Z
V
(δu) T L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ∀δu
Equilibrium equations
Navier’s equations Z
V
L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ⇐⇒L T σ + ρb = 0 ∀P ∈ V σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equations
Navier’s equations Z
V
L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ⇐⇒L T σ + ρb = 0 ∀P ∈ V σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
Weak formulation – weighting function w ≡ δu – kinematically admissible displacement variation
Z
V
(δu) T L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ∀δu
V σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
Weak formulation – weighting function w ≡ δu – kinematically admissible displacement variation (complying with kinematic b.cs)
Z
V
(δu) T L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ∀δu
− Z
V
(Lδu) T σdV + Z
S
(δu) T σndS + Z
V
(δu) T ρbdV = 0
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equations
Navier’s equations Z
V
L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ⇐⇒L T σ + ρb = 0 ∀P ∈ V σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
Weak formulation – weighting function w ≡ δu – kinematically admissible displacement variation (complying with kinematic b.cs)
Z
V
(δu) T L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ∀δu
− Z
V
(Lδu) T σdV + Z
S
(δu) T σn t
dS + Z
V
(δu) T ρbdV = 0
V σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
Weak formulation – weighting function w ≡ δu – kinematically admissible displacement variation (complying with kinematic b.cs)
Z
V
(δu) T L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ∀δu
− Z
V
(Lδu) T σdV + Z
S
(δu) T tdS + Z
V
(δu) T ρbdV = 0
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equations
Navier’s equations Z
V
L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ⇐⇒L T σ + ρb = 0 ∀P ∈ V σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
Weak formulation – weighting function w ≡ δu – kinematically admissible displacement variation – it is virtual work principle
Z
V
(δu) T L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ∀δu Z
V
(Lδu) T σdV = Z
S
(δu) T tdS + Z
V
(δu) T ρbdV
V σ ij,j + ρb i = 0
Weak formulation – weighting function w ≡ δu – kinematically admissible displacement variation – it is virtual work principle
Z
V
(δu) T L T σ + ρb dV = 0 ∀δu
Z
V
(Lδu) T σdV = Z
S
(δu) T tdS + Z
V
(δu) T ρbdV
work of internal forces work of external forces
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
FEM discretization (n=NNE, N =NDOF, E=NE)
Displacement field approximation u eh =
n
X
i=1
N i e (ξ, η, ζ)q e i = N e q e
N e
[3×3n] =
N 1 e 0 0 . . . N n e 0 0 0 N 1 e 0 . . . 0 N n e 0 0 0 N 1 e . . . 0 0 N n e
q e
[3n×1]
=
q e 1 . . . q e n
y z
2 8
9
11 14
17
η ζ
η ζ
i
j l
m n
o p q e
[3n×1]
= T I e
[3n×N ] Q
[N ×1]
e=1
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e δu e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(δu e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(δu e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e N e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e N e B e
δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e δu e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(δu e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(δu e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
(δq e ) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e δu e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(δu e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(δu e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
( δq e I T e δQ
) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
( I T e δQ) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e δu e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(δu e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(δu e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
( I T e δQ) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
(δQ) T
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
( I T e δQ) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
(δQ) T
∀δQ
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e δu e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(δu e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(δu e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
( I T e δQ) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
( I T e δQ) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e
=
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
S e
N eT t e dS e + Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(L e δu e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(δu e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(δu e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
Z
V e
(B e δq e ) T σ e dV e − Z
S e
(N e δq e ) T t e dS e − Z
V e
(N e δq e ) T f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
( I T e δQ) T
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e − Z
S e
N eT t e dS e − Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
= 0
E
X eT Z
eT e e
E
X eT Z
eT e e
Z
eT e e
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e
=
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
S e
N eT t e dS e + Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
Equilibrium equation
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e
=
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
S e
N eT t e dS e + Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
Consideration of kinamatic and constitutive equations linear elasticity: σ = Dε
linear kinematic relation: ε = Lu
σ e = D e L e u e = D e L e N e q e = D e B e T I e Q
Equilibrium equation
Consideration of kinamatic and constitutive equations linear elasticity: σ = Dε
linear kinematic relation: ε = Lu
σ e = D e L e u e = D e L e N e q e = D e B e T I e Q
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT D e B e T I e QdV e
=
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
S e
N eT t e dS e + Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e
=
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
S e
N eT t e dS e + Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
Consideration of kinamatic and constitutive equations linear elasticity: σ = Dε
linear kinematic relation: ε = Lu
σ e = D e L e u e = D e L e N e q e = D e B e T I e Q
Equilibrium equation
E
X eT (
Z
eT e e e
)
e E
X eT (
Z
eT e e Z
eT e e
)
Consideration of kinamatic and constitutive equations linear elasticity: σ = Dε
linear kinematic relation: ε = Lu
σ e = D e L e u e = D e L e N e q e = D e B e T I e Q
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
I
T eT k e T I e Q =
E
X
e=1
I T eT p e b +
E
X
e=1
I T eT p e
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Equilibrium equation of discretized structure
Equilibrium equation
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
V e
B eT σ e dV e
=
E
X
e=1
I T eT
Z
S e
N eT t e dS e + Z
V e
N eT f e dV e
Consideration of kinamatic and constitutive equations linear elasticity: σ = Dε
linear kinematic relation: ε = Lu
σ e = D e L e u e = D e L e N e q e = D e B e T I e Q Equilibrium equation
E
X eT e e
E
X eT e
E
X eT e
Consideration of kinamatic and constitutive equations linear elasticity: σ = Dε
linear kinematic relation: ε = Lu
σ e = D e L e u e = D e L e N e q e = D e B e T I e Q
Equilibrium equation
KQ = P b + P
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Plane stress (σ z = 0)
Displacement vector u = {u(x, y), v(x, y)}
Strain vector
ε = {ε x , ε y , γ xy }
Stress vector
σ = {σ x , σ y , τ xy }
Traction vector
Body force intensity vector f = {f x , f y } Constitutive matrix
D = E 1 − ν 2
1 ν 0
ν 1 0
0 0 1−ν 2
Differential operator matrix
∂
∂x 0
∂
A
A e , h e – FE area and thickness, resp.
Element loading vector p e =
Z
A e
N eT f e h e dA e
Boundary loading vector
p e b = Z
Γ e
N eT t e h e dΓ e
x e y e
Γ e A e
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
FEs for panels
Three-noded element
u e (x, y) = N e (x, y) q e
N e =
N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e 0 0 N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e
, q e =
q 1 q 2 q 3 q 4 q 5 q 6
x e y e
i
k
j q 1 e
q 2
q 3
q 4 q 5
q 6
N e =
N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e 0 0 N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e
, q e =
q 1 q 2 q 3 q 4 q 5 q 6
x e i
k
j q 1 e
q 2
q 3
q 4
y e N i (x e , y e )
x e 1 i
k
j
y e N j (x e , y e )
x e 1
i k
j y e
N k (x e , y e )
x e
1 i
k
j
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
FEs for panels
Four-noded element
u e (x, y) = N e (x, y) q e N e =
N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e 0 N l e 0 0 N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e 0 N l e
q e = {q 1 , q 2 , q 3 , q 4 , q 5 , q 6 , q 7 , q 8 }
x e y e
i
k
j l
e q 1
q 2
q 3
q 4 q 5
q 6 q 7
q 8
N e =
N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e 0 N l e 0 0 N i e 0 N j e 0 N k e 0 N l e
q e = {q 1 , q 2 , q 3 , q 4 , q 5 , q 6 , q 7 , q 8 }
x e
i j
e q 1
q 2
q 3
q 4
y e N i (x, y)
x e 1
i
j
k
l y e
N l (x, y)
x e i 1 j
k l y e
N j (x, y)
x e 1 j i
k
l y e
N k (x, y)
x e 1
i j
k l
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25 h = 0.2 m
X Y
4 i
5 j
2 k 1
l
Discretization
i j
3 k
1 2
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Q 4 Q 5
Q 6
Q 7
Q 8
Q 9
Q 10
elem. no. node numbers
1 4 5 2 1
2 5 3 2
4 m 2 m
2 m
ν = 0.25 h = 0.2 m
X Y
4 i
5 j
2 k 1
l
Discretization
i j
3 k
1 2
Q 1
Q 2
Q 3
Q 4
Q 5
Q 6
Q 7
Q 8
Q 9
Q 10
elem. no. node numbers
1 4 5 2 1
2 5 3 2
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m Y Discretization
1 Q2 Q3 2 Q4 3
Q5
Constitutive matrix
D = 18 · 10 6 1 − 0.25 2
1 0.25 0
0.25 1 0
0 0 1−0.25 2
[kPa]
D =
19.2 4.8 0 4.8 19.2 0 0 0 7.2
· 10 6 [kPa]
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m X
Y Discretization
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q1
Q2 Q3 Q4
Q5
Q6 Q7
Q8
Q9 Q10
D = 1 − 0.25 2 0.25 1 0 0 0 1−0.25 2
[kPa]
D =
19.2 4.8 0 4.8 19.2 0 0 0 7.2
· 10 6 [kPa]
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m y (1) Discretization
1 Q1 8 = Q2 Q1 6 = Q4 2 3
Shape functions – Element 1
N i 1 (x (1) , y (1) ) = x (1) y (1) − 2x (1) − 4y (1) + 8
8 , N k 1 (x (1) , y (1) ) = x (1) y (1) 8 N j 1 (x (1) , y (1) ) = − x (1) y (1) − 2x (1)
8 , N l 1 (x (1) , y (1) ) = − x (1) y (1) − 4y (1) 8 N 1 =
N i 1 0 N j 1 0 N k 1 0 N l 1 0 0 N i 1 0 N j 1 0 N k 1 0 N l 1
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (1)
y (1) Discretization
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q1 7 = Q1
Q1 8 = Q2
Q1 5 = Q3 Q1 6 = Q4
Q1 1 = Q7
Q1 2 = Q8 Q1 3 = Q9
Q1 4 = Q10
Matrix K – Element 1
B 1 (x (1) , y (1) ) =
y (1)
8 − 1 4 0 1 4 − y 8 (1) 0 y (1) 8 0 − y (1) 8 0 0 x (1) 8 − 1
2 0 − x (1)
8 0 x (1) 8 0 1 2 − x (1)
8 x (1)
8 − 1 2 y (1) 8 − 4 1 − x (1) 8 1 4 − y (1) 8 x (1) 8 y (1) 8 2 1 − x (1) 8 − y (1) 8
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m y (1) Discretization
1 Q1 8 = Q2 Q1 6 = Q4 2 3
Matrix K – Element 1
B 1 (x (1) , y (1) ) =
y (1)
8 − 1 4 0 1 4 − y 8 (1) 0 y (1) 8 0 − y (1) 8 0 0 x (1) 8 − 1
2 0 − x (1)
8 0 x (1) 8 0 1 2 − x (1)
8 x (1)
8 − 1 2 y (1) 8 − 4 1 − x (1) 8 1 4 − y (1) 8 x (1) 8 y (1) 8 2 1 − x (1) 8 − y (1) 8
K 1 = Z 2
0
Z 4 0
B 1 T DB 1 h dx (1) dy (1) =
16 6 -1.6 -1.2 -8 -6 -6.4 1.2 6 28 1.2 10.4 -6 -14 -1.2 -24.4 -1.6 1.2 16 -6 -6.4 -1.2 -8 6 -1.2 10.4 -6 28 1.2 -24.4 6 -14 -8 -6 -6.4 1.2 16 6 -1.6 -1.2 -6 -14 -1.2 -24.4 6 28 1.2 10.4 -6.4 -1.2 -8 6 -1.6 1.2 16 -6 1.2 -24.4 6 -14 -1.2 10.4 -6 28
· 10 5
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (2)
Discretization y (2)
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q2 5 = Q3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Q2 4 = Q6
Q2 1 = Q9
Q2 2 = Q10
i 2 k 2
N j 2 (x (2) , y (2) ) = x (2) 2 N 2 =
N i 2 0 N j 2 0 N k 2 0 0 N i 2 0 N j 2 0 N k 2
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
Discretization y (2)
1 Q2 5 = Q3 2 3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Matrix K – Element 2
B 2 (x (2) , y (2) ) =
0 0 1 2 0 - 1 2 0 0 - 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 - 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 - 1 2
K 2 = B 2 T DB 2 hA 2 =
7.2 0 0 -7.2 -7.2 7.2 0 19.2 -4.8 0 4.8 -19.2 0 -4.8 19.2 0 -19.2 4.8 -7.2 0 0 7.2 7.2 -7.2 -7.2 4.8 -19.2 7.2 26.4 -12 7.2 -19.2 4.8 -7.2 -12 26.4
· 10 5
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (2)
Discretization y (2)
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q2 5 = Q3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Q2 4 = Q6
Q2 1 = Q9
Q2 2 = Q10
B (x , y ) =
0 - 2 0 0 0 2 - 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 - 1 2
K 2 = B 2 T DB 2 hA 2 =
7.2 0 0 -7.2 -7.2 7.2 0 19.2 -4.8 0 4.8 -19.2 0 -4.8 19.2 0 -19.2 4.8 -7.2 0 0 7.2 7.2 -7.2 -7.2 4.8 -19.2 7.2 26.4 -12 7.2 -19.2 4.8 -7.2 -12 26.4
· 10 5
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m y (1) Discretization
1 Q1 8 = Q2 Q1 6 = Q4 2 3
Wektor P b – Element 1 P 1 b =
Z
Γ 1 ij
N 1T tdΓ + Z
Γ 1 jk
N 1T tdΓ+
Z
Γ 1 kl
N 1T tdΓ+
Z
Γ 1 li
N 1T tdΓ
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (1)
y (1) Discretization
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q1 7 = Q1
Q1 8 = Q2
Q1 5 = Q3 Q1 6 = Q4
Q1 1 = Q7
Q1 2 = Q8 Q1 3 = Q9
Q1 4 = Q10 jk
interelem. edge force balance along line 2-5 t 1 jk = −t 2 ki
kl li
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m y (1) Discretization
1 Q1 8 = Q2 Q1 6 = Q4 2 3
Wektor P b – Element 1 P 1 b =
Z
Γ 1 kl
N 1T tdΓ + Z
Γ 1 li
N 1T tdΓ
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m 6 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (1)
y (1) Discretization
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q1 7 = Q1
Q1 8 = Q2
Q1 5 = Q3 Q1 6 = Q4
Q1 1 = Q7
Q1 2 = Q8 Q1 3 = Q9
Q1 4 = Q10
Z
Γ 1 kl
N 1T tdΓ = Z 4
0
N 1 (x (1) , y (1) = 2) T "
0
−3
1 − x (1) 4
− 6 x 4 (1)
# dx (1)
= {0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -8}
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m y (1) Discretization
1 Q1 8 = Q2 Q1 6 = Q4 2 3
Wektor P b – Element 1
P 1 b = {0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -8} + Z
Γ 1 li
N 1T tdΓ Z
Γ 1 li
N 1T tdΓ = Z 2
0
N 1 (x (1) = 0, y (1) ) T
tdy (1)
= {R 1 1 R 1 2 0 0 0 0 R 1 7 R 1 8 }
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (1)
y (1) Discretization
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q1 7 = Q1
Q1 8 = Q2
Q1 5 = Q3 Q1 6 = Q4
Q1 1 = Q7
Q1 2 = Q8 Q1 3 = Q9
Q1 4 = Q10
P 1 b =
R 1 R 1 2 0 0 0 -10 R 1 7 R 1 8 -8
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
Discretization y (2)
1 Q2 5 = Q3 2 3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Wektor P b – Element 2
P 2 b = Z
Γ 2 ij
N 2T tdΓ + Z
Γ 2 jk
N 2T tdΓ + Z
Γ 2 ki
N 2T tdΓ
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (2)
Discretization y (2)
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q2 5 = Q3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Q2 4 = Q6
Q2 1 = Q9
Q2 2 = Q10
Γ 2 ij Γ 2 jk Γ 2 ki
interelem. edge force balance along line 2-5 t 1 jk = −t 2 ki
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
Discretization y (2)
1 Q2 5 = Q3 2 3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Wektor P b – Element 2
P 2 b = − Z
Γ 2 jk
N 2T tdΓ
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m 6 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (2)
Discretization y (2)
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q2 5 = Q3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Q2 4 = Q6
Q2 1 = Q9
Q2 2 = Q10
Γ 2 jk
Z
Γ 2 jk
N 2T tdΓ = Z 2
0
N 1 (x (2) , y (2) = 2) T "
0
−6
1 − x (2) 2
− 7.5 x (2) 2
# dx (2)
= {0 0 0 -7 0 -6.5}
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
Discretization y (2)
1 Q2 5 = Q3 2 3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Wektor P b – Element 2
P 2 b =
0 0 0 -7 0 -6.5
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (1)
y (1) Discretization
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q1 7 = Q1
Q1 8 = Q2
Q1 5 = Q3 Q1 6 = Q4
Q1 1 = Q7
Q1 2 = Q8 Q1 3 = Q9
Q1 4 = Q10
I B 1 =
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
glob. no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m y (1) Discretization
1 Q1 8 = Q2 Q1 6 = Q4 2 3
Assembly – Boole’s matrix I B
I B 1 =
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
loc. no.
glob. no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (1)
y (1) Discretization
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q1 7 = Q1
Q1 8 = Q2
Q1 5 = Q3 Q1 6 = Q4
Q1 1 = Q7
Q1 2 = Q8 Q1 3 = Q9
Q1 4 = Q10
I B 1 =
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
glob. no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund
Example
Statics of a panel
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m y (1) Discretization
1 Q1 8 = Q2 Q1 6 = Q4 2 3
Assembly – Boole’s matrix I B
I B 1 =
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
loc. no.
glob. no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3 kN/m
7.5 kN/m
4 m 2 m
2 m
E = 18 GPa ν = 0.25
h = 0.2 m x (2)
Discretization y (2)
4
i j
k 1
l 1
i j
3 k
2 2
5 Q2 5 = Q3
Q2 6 = Q4
Q2 3 = Q5
Q2 4 = Q6
Q2 1 = Q9
Q2 2 = Q10
I B 2 =
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
glob. no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 3 4 5 6
This lecture was prepared within project ”The development of the didactic potential of Cracow University of Technology in the range of modern construction”, co-financed by the European Union within the European Social Fund