'flab.
v. Scheepshouwkunde
Technische Hogeschool
%.,diCirED
Delft
Technical Note No. .',ero.1688 Technical Note No. ro.1688
SeeteMber,
1945
T ESTBLISETT,FRNBORO1JGH
Visualisation of the Boundar7 Layer Transition
in Water by G.E. Pringle, Ph.D., and J.D. Main-Smith, Ph.D., B.Sc. SUNIILRY
In the study of water resistance of submerged solid bodies it is
of value
to
discover the location of the transition from laminar toturbulent flow in the boundary layer. convenient visual method of
doing this is to apply a sparingly-soluble solid film to the test surface. The process of solutionas accelerated by turbulence in the boundary
layer and if the time of immersion is correct, the film is wholly removed
in the turbulent zone but not in the laminar zone. The areas of laminar
flaw are then revealed white against the Original dark background.
1. Introduction
Experiments have already been describedl in which the state of the boundary layer is revealed by a process of sublimation in air. The rate of
transport
of vapour from the surface of a volatile substancein ir airstream is markedly affected by the degree of turbulence in the
'boundary layer. In a similar way, during a process of dissolving into
a liquid, the rate of solution of a solid can be strongly influenced by boundary
layer
turbulence which is equivalent to a stirring or "scrubbing" action in bringing more solvent to act on the solid surface in a giventime. In the study of hydrodynamic profile drag this diLferential
solubility eifect can be utilised for the qualitative indication of the
regions of laminar and turbulent flow over the surface of a submerged or partly submerged body, such as a seaplane float. first we require the deposition of a sparingly soluble solid film, which will adhere to the surface under water. This should dissolve only very slowly in
still
water. In a moving stream, it should dissolve at such a rate that visual differentiation of the laminar and turbulent zones occurs in the length of run available, but not so quickly that the result is appreciably affected bywhat occurs
during the starting and stopping phases of the run.The material described below Seems to satisfy these requirements for the
speeds available in the R.A..E. Seaplane Tank, where the tests were made.
A
11.
Tech.Note No Lero.1638
2. 'Material
' The 'following solution was used in the experiftents:T.,
Acetanilide 10.0g.
Dibutyl -phthalate 2.5g.
Acetone 57.5c.c.
Toluene .30.0c.c.
This is Sprayed on
to
the test surface with a simple form of spray-gun using the laboratory supply of compressed air, the droplets reaching thesurface slightly :before they dry out. L thin white film is formed
which is not noticeably rough and can be further smoothed by careful
rubbing down. The visibility of the film is chiefly due to the crystals
of acetanilide. This substance itself has a low solubility in water,
but does not form an adherent film if used alone. Immersion in water then lifts the film off almost instantaneously. The dibutyl phthalate has high water repellency, and forms a thin, very adherent film which
does not became wet on immersion in water. It is, however, transparent.
The two substances together forma thin film which is visible and water-repellent, and which becames transparent only on prolonged exposure to
water. It is fairly easy to remove by rubbing with a cloth wetted. with
petrol or other organic solvent.
3. Tests and results_
Preliminary tests with light," unstained varnished surfaces gave
some difficulty in seeing the thin solid film. For future work models will probably be stained dark. Fig.1 shows 4 test specimen prepared
-.for measurement of profile drag of a keeled flat surface. This is
blackened and shows the results quite clearly. To obtain-this indication,
the wedge-shaped body was first, suspended clear
of
the water from the carriage of the Seaplane Tank. The carriage was accelerated to a speedof 10 ft./sec., and the body then quickly lowered to its test, position
" partly submerged at a slight positive incidence.
After 5 seconds
Immersion it was quickly raised. The record was then visible, and was
cleared of excess water drops with a jet of air before being photographed.
The photograph shows the following features:
(i)', The intersection Of the disturbed water sUrface with the model'
surface
.The forward wetted edge due' to spray thrown forward of (i).
Laminar zane of the boundary layer extendingto, the trailing edge
' Wedge-shaped turbulent zone due to wakes of the excrescences of plasticene put therefor the purpose
Smaller wedge-shaped wake of an imperfection" in the surface.
The Reynolds number of this test was 1.1 million. A further test at a higher speed, 20 ft./sec., showed the expected forward displacement
of the natural transition front. Conclusions
The method deScribed seems satisfactory for tests relating
to
profile drag on a surface which has been varnished black, provided that the tests can be done by rapid immersion during the run. In other cases, theacceleration phase may a serious drawback.
Attached-:
Fig.l - Neg. No. 65112
.:J-stribution: D.D.S.R.1 (1+3) (Action copy) A.L4R.D.T.1 R.T.P.(T.I.B.) (2+1) R.T.P.2a (110) (30)
Superintendent, N.P.L., Ship Division
Superintendent, Has lar Experiment Tank, Gosport.
Director
D.D.R.E.
Library
S.M.E.
.,ero (1), T/, P, F, Mat./Chem, W, T (2)
Tech.Note No. kero.1688
.i-FIFERENCE
No. Iluthor Title,. etc.
1 Pringle and i.Aain-Smith Boundary-layer transition indicated
by sublimation.
1,ero. L'ech, Note No.
1652.
June,1945.
3.
(ii) SPRAY LINE
0) WATER LINE
(fit) LAMINAR. ZON E OF BOUNDARY LAYER Rv) TUSULENT
ZONE OF E5OUNDARY LAYE.R DUE TO EXCRESCENCE. (V) TURBULENT WAKE. OF SURFACE I MPERFECTIONSF1G.1
ROYAL AIRCRAFT ESTABLISHMENT
PHOTOGRAPNIC DIVISION COPY NEG. No 65112