' I1 ''5 ,. , .t 0- --?pr,...Te-' r.,, '1.11.;:cJ.-?J ....-.4.-- ',.' l'',,, ;,.
/ "
1.);'''-'.2';EtiL- ' I .t-;'. ' - ,...t. , 5 , , , , . 1 ,,,,k, ., i 1 ; -..., .J\ . A ' ...,,N. ,s,,j, , "...I ..A -, ,le - Y . .' 4 ' 4 . 1., -- ,1 9' , 'f1), _ I T,,.1,ar_A.k.. `a"s`l ,.,r,. '- , . , ca, 1, \ . ,.. 't _21 , "4.__.". '' 1 ..t. ' . , .4
'
''',r,...,t. ,
.. A I ,{1----,, , - :. , ,,
,,' e-,---q, , Nri i.r,-,----, ,, - A .
- . . '' -.) -1, , , ,ti ,,, J ....
'
,,:q.-1 , -.,'
- ,,' ' ',' ' , ° '..;; '-'., -:. 065Q5-3-T . ' -'ff''".. ' ' .,.. ., k "lc. a - f\-ei ,` ,,,, ,JL r i` . ., V ' 1 I. ) : . ,1,:.,.% 4. ,,..,, ' 1 I , ..4 'r ? ' _, 1 k ' '. ' ' F, '1 I I-'4' L . , ,. . .,-, -,,,I'a"1.]-\\)r, '
' 1-, - _,.. , pp. -,. ).-,,,, ,,,..,./., " N .1.. . t k Vy. ) -,., N; I 1 r . ' k ' \ ' s L. '4,, s'i Y`i :',,, '' r ' . ...., -1,-,p,, 0 - e F,' , ... ; ie, '''.0 11 '-'' '4 \ '--- Y: 1 - '1 : r' _v 1.= ;-'56 ..., - .,..._ HOFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION
ANN ARBOR
0
, ..-I- .',*" - ', ' ,,.,,,,,,
1 I 4' ..- '-t-' . -,, 1 iaktAlri,.--,ttrAftr ,I.S, 1.." I. \ rp ' , v.., ' '1,±4,_,, 7 p 'II ' 41, yr, 4
' - ., , , r i ,,, j.., , ] ,. 1 ',: , .4,.1 Y 7 . .. I t. ' 4
\II ,1 ...., I. I COLLEGE OF ' ENGINEERING '.;';'j 1'1'; t'r '.--. ''.:7'-- '-'- .._, - -
''' ''''''
, ''. L'' 4',,,,;.).0t,,,,, ,,, ,
-' -' ' t1.4(''' ';:, '4 ' --.;,e, '''' 4 '-' ',..; . 4.''...i1
%'!' 0- ',s.-'-,-., Y '..%'' DEPARTMENT OF ,ENGINEERING ,MECHANICS i's' r_
.S:r(lb 17 ' -.?.: ' - '' - ' '- i ' it' 1. ''-'' I , w " 1,14 ..1 r,e ,, i . . -, Vf , I a ' ';1' \-r '.,,,' i* ,ks- 4 ..P \' r -, . I 0 10 :' , ) ,I ' , ''
---,,,
''' r -j I. 7 1._`..`t'llc- *, 1 - * ri " 1- ' ,t, , - 1 , -A, v tr-i,,,, 1 ,.,. , ... , . ... 01 , ,' ..- ' -:. 1 .r1 ' - A., i . ( -/ ,,,,,:', i 't e -,' tr -.R. ..,1 111:1:4' J-I,', ,p it 3 rt' ''.p,s i 1 '1;`:.N''' , 4 . ,Technical Report 1",',--Y .-, - , -....
- . 1 4 I - .-1. f,t ,-,I , .4 p ,k f I kr -.' s; V "t!... or ,` ,,... 1,C. o ` a' -,,, 1 . , ,, , , = '"'N. c '''- 1 r i .,,,_1'-'0 41>:,- " ' - 5 tv --,"' r.: ; .,, -- , ' -I. . '. p . i ., 0 , . .4., oi I .-, t l .1 ,Y, o 1,
' ),. ,, '1 ' s-i4 I,* l',. ---' .,k.i,,-(r.. .--\ . , '
..!.1::"I'#' 441:-Iif,
The Stabiliti'af 'Parallel Flows
' :_ -, .:. .t ...
I r'l - t 6 ''"1, '1 7
`) . '
'-,' A. _-,k ,,- 4 ''_ 4;4:
.1../ . , t , .., ' , ./ ,
/' '',`s, '''
1:- l',1/4" N 1,1,o f Fluids "4/ i th !. Me mori
es ,t'-',,,'-''- -,.,,,,, : ' ,-v'''-. . .. ._ .. ,. - ... , ,,.t. ( .., ,, ,,, ... , ,,, , , . _ , ,, ,,,. , ,,, iI s ' , .I.., 41, 4. ',
- ",.
j : -'. \ ''t. 1a 1 : jj...'')! . .'''"'
''..41 ,i- : '1: a ''' ,', --'4''.,,,,,, ,, -,,Y ,./ :§-,- ,,,,l_ 2 ,/,,,,-. _ :',..4' 1,P ,.., ',.11''',4-.'' ' ' I', ' ,-Y!/ ,,7k '..,,1,1,1. .7,, :1:, 41'v :A t ,, 1--'' ,.' ,_ ) a ri- ',1ci '`f ,", ' .,,A
' r ',(' ''' . i i . e.t. - ',(::- -.7. --t' , ..- ..e rl _-_ Vit-.71',if, (1,, / 1 .) , ,, li, - , z,,
i ' '? Jrt_ ' '
r " -
--1-til", li {- - k , ' . v 1,I i`-, . ,' t; -,1;1 'f" - ..-N af'' '71i'. -';:i.s., A--,,-y1,1'".r ..: 1 A .60' .)''t-it.z.'''4.4. ;,. 7- 9 ,41..'"'71, r,,i',.-t, i . r, ^ :'- ' 4I ' fl ' 6 '' ,,N't, \ , ', q r.Y ,-,' ,/, ,1-' x.t 'i -;.. .4:,,..;.., ' i,-,, . . 4 I . '
, ,' .4, ,,s. - , 2 ' , ,,; " r -I", -, j.14 . '
T " ,
.-, 0, ''' C 1. ,i V - y V I i,
' Iii ' I:N ':".:(., rtlfr. -,,' IA,V,r '',.1 ..q. jif i,'' rti.f._.,. r, -'-,, f '',.reg,-- r . -,,,.,...- , - - .: /- 1-dr, -/-- A-7.,, ,,- i.1`. '.p, : r-'7<,4- ,i , 17 7., 1 1 , I, Ai ','-_,, ',,/t ;_. , ; ,.. ---71 , t .. -y-,.. .y , i. t , ,1 , I L, ,,,, --7,,, i -, - , 'N.. ,. 4: i. -.4- '13 .' ,2'.0. A I -i. sk,, 7,L_ ''',. ' '1' 7' ' .",) - 'N', 1,; ' : ' ' 'ff ' 1.. ) - ,
' 71:4). " ' '1' A .: `f e' veht I.- - 'r '.,! -. _ . '', '2.-1". j` " ' '. %.' ,.4i,' ;-iii-,s; (V),, -, - . , - i t. . .44';' -7-(4
x
7F-' l 4-'''' t;-: . Y4., .1;:, I/, LA . , ilS
,-' ' f 1 )''' 1 -7 1 'f ...
- " \
? ''',',,N i .t1, DEAN T.' MOOK , '' -- ..I.I., "'A' '.'1`1- 1-- ' 4-',-`r1 F-h--.):. , , )4'1=14', 'k., ,t41,....,.. - ,. ?''J,11-7 h. -,:k1+-', <4 / - - ' ' -"'f+ - i,, A - . / 1. ' :I - tr - si'',-..4.1"Adt_ To - - ' , , . W.. P.' GR AEBEL; PROJECT DIRECTOR
"I''''- ',.' -.5c7. 1.'"), .,f.' ' t- ( , , k I
(.., , , , ' 1 ' 'a I ''" .
,-Y-'; II.,' I9-4 :I ', 4: ) fjs, 7,:: ;-al ' 'iN'' .1" ,,,V.:95 i - ' ' ' ''
,, ..., I. , '' r' It' ( ; . kt '. '' ' . '.' \ ', I. 'yr, ' r. OV., 4, .' i I- ' , ' !I "I r ;" s ''; - A .,, ;,.. - ,;;, 'x ---', - , '' '
kli ;
' '1 'IL r' '/:-.- ''.,t r e;41.1. 4,,,,,,,. v , ...; ,, ., . . , - ,y. ,. ,, , t"` ' a-...1 a p . ' - ." .. , i c (-4\ ,. ' ,',74-41 ,-2,, 4-... 1, . r i',',4' -1 '' A 0 . -,.., { : ' ..i. - ' ' -' , ' , --'' Or '-.- k,v,.:' r4 '1,7'. 7 1 - a raj:, ' T'' '' 1 ' '' ' (' I MY: 1, /_.-( V4 ' ' ' ' - 1/ 4- ' ' -a. i.\- ,.1, , . , .v,,, : .; --), , - 4)- ,, ,. ,,'-,, 1\ k-7:-,-; -,,k1 ,': ,-. , ,,,,4_;,,.l I ,.. ,.. 1,P, A y , 4: 7 , r I ,- ., C ''VN l'1,-, -. ! ;'' I I ' , ',gri ' t. .4 ').. f , . ' ' P* ' et . ' I 1 .-., '-p ,,,,-,_ ,---.,,,, , x f, N. ' ' '':') fs,r1")-7 i .' .,,I, 1 ' I, r,,,,, I. . - ,4_,..i. 7-"Yo --' ... 7 , . 1, ', i .t r 4 , r-': '-/- I' f ,, i I " !11-1 \z4,.7 la-/ Under contract with -, . 7%
II . ... r ar-'.., , 7.- ..*/ ,t- .., , , If C 1 I ,, -J \ ''.::,., ' . . I . , ' L'' ' J I a r I ..;' I I , 'S. , P (. .1 P. V I I, . ..a'i ';',.--,e 4 7 I , Or. ;',. trr., , ' .1 , 10 4 y ,t t . . ' -.1":f;-r - ''r I -' 1 ' '' . : .1 ,
Departmenti of the Navy ,:., c,,:', (_,..,, . ,.,--,, ,r, ,-,-;,
t.
;
,.., . ,
...1,, .- 1. / -',4 - i. L4
.
( '''' * v Office/ of Naval' Research
- 1 1 -. '-' , ' .. .,. , , . ( ' - A 1a a , , ,-, i_
a -* Contract No. Nonr-1224(49), NR 'No. 0 -342
I -' 62 1 ,-.E'.,,,,,, - , r','T - r' ' t. f,,,,'. ' 1 s )3C 1.,/q%, , , , ''' -' 1 I ,, I-, -- / $ Washington, D. C. ) '', -' k, ." $4)' p ,i--.... t t - '-"g- i-t^ p . -'. ; 4 ,.1 -a- ,/ 4 , a '4.',ag '' I ' ' 'T 'II'. a) iIr 4 - " , 1 , 4i 1 , I/ S.4- ,--a- , \ - Pr 4. a '''',1 ' Vrki7 . ' ' .. --rl: ''' Administered through::'' '7; ---.>.
),'
-.,,. '1 , September,1967:Afl.),-' . ' t .4 1\ 1 c 1 - 17,4 IL 1 - t 5k - . ' ' I A : 1 ; kr.;Wctmi.44-"Pneriei
United States of America
Department of the Navy
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH, BRANCH OFFICE
Keysign House, 429 Oxford Street
London, W. I, England
ONE 3930/1
- .'
.--THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Department of Engineering Mechanics
Technical Report
THE STABILITY OF PARALLEL, FLOWS OF FLUIDS WITH MEMORIES
Dean T. Mook
W. P Graebel
ORA Project, 06507
under contract with:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH
CONTRACT NO, Nonr-1224()i-9), NR NO. 062-342
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
administered through:
OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION ANN ARBOR
September 1967
unlimited-TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS iv
ABSTRACT
I., INTRODUCTION 1
II. GOVERNING EQUATIONS 8
III. ASYMPTOTIC SOLUTIONS 20
A. The Determination of the Characteristic Equation for 6
Nailier-Stokes Liquid 20 0
B. The Determination of the Characteristic Equation for a. 1
Viscoelastic Liquid of Type A' or BL 29
C. Solution of the Characteristics Equation 31
D. the Stability of a, Viscoelastic Liquid of Type C' 36
BIBLIOGRAPHY 42
iv
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Table Page
1. Velocity and Stresses for Primary Flow of Materials A', B',
and C' 10
Figure
Neutral stability curves for various values of N.. 37
Critical Reynolds number versus the parameter R1. 38 Neutral stability curves and curves of constant c for various
The Stability of Parallel Flows of Fluids with Memories
D. T. Mook
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
and
W, P, Graebel
The University of Michigan
Abstract
The equations governing the stability of plane parallel flows
are developed for three models of fluids with memories. Asymptotic
solutions valid for large Reynolds numbers are obtaired and the effect
of the memory are shown to be destabilizing. The approach to the
problem allows evaluation of how fast a memory must fade to allow
evaluation of the stresses in power series in the time interval, An alternate approach to inverting convected derivatives is also presented.
-I. Introduction
A recent paper by Chan Man Fong and Waiters (1965) considered the stability of parallel flows of two visco-elastic fluids with very
short memories The present work extends their analysis to such
fluids with long but still fading memory and also extends the analysis to a newer model which has been proposed by Goddard and Miller (1966). A discussion of the various convected derivatives is also presented in a manner which allows more ready physical interpreta-tion as well as a quicker way of obtaining forms for convected integrals.
Quasi-linear models of visco-elastic fluids are usually written
in the form
E
LM
+
E." L)
z:
where
is related to the total stress t by
t-
I-p
d is the rate of deformation tensor, and
Lt is a time derivative
operator satisfying the principal of material indifference,
constantsXn and r
are related to the stress relaxation times andrate of deformation relaxation times, respectively. Several forms
for these operators have been proposed in the past 1See Oldrovd
(1968) for a review); we present here briefly three of these definitions in a somewhat different manner which facilitates their physical
interpretation
If 0 is a convected material reference frame, and -la is a set
of covariant base vectors defined by (r a position vector) so that
aea
Chapter 3)9 then a second order tensor can be written as
or
=
Tr yP
4r3ya being the contravariant base vectors defined by
eV.
The absence of a dot or cross between two vectors indicates the
indefinite, or dyadic, product. Oldroyd (1950) proposed two separate
definitions for tt; denoting time differentiation with material
coordinates held fixed by D/Dt they are
yP
OtATI:it
rr
u-
t
for the model he called type A , and
t
ri1=1for the model he called type B. Lattft teLdices and base vectors here
refer to a space fixed reference frame, It is readily found by the
normal tensor transformation laws that
and that
where CO is the vorticity tensor. Thus Oldroyd's definition of the convected rate is the material rate of those tensor components which an observer would measure with respect to a coordinate system both rotating and deforming with the material; for type A the components
are measured with respect to the contravariant base vectors, while for type B the covariant base vectors are used, the base vectors in
both cases btdng both stretched and rotated with the material. The present iorm of writing the convected derivative allows
ready inversion, for letting
then since
CAID-r
-t-t crinicobri.)
T.J
t
co%
,
de:Pi
Drj
(0e:k.4
of tt
co'L) T",
Dt
-4-co
l_1(16pri
D t
(4' + CA 3and since the es are constant in time for a material particle,
w0t2,(191-e)
a o4
610f6 c'taxi'" a le
x`
axi
"j"Fek /Aim (X ;a
ct
t;(I: \Ail% 1 otiand aiUar1y for the type B derivative. These integral& were
presonted first by Oldroyd (1950); they were used by Walters (1962)
In models designated as A' and B' by writing
or
a)e-
de
2
r
t)
ôxcl,,(xiiilde
(2)d
is)d-t)1 (3)
respectively, where 4(t) is a material relaxation function.* When
40) coneiste of a combination of exponential. and Dirac delta functions,
and
equations (2) and (3) are exactly equivalent to equation (1); otherwise
they are generalizations cf equation (I). (For example, when N M 1,
equation (I) is obtained by taking N(p) a
t
xi. (1.))(1-
--LnAL
Jaumann (1911) proposed a different definition of Lt which we
shall designate as Ltc. Introducing new base vectors ro, by
eNIO
where S satisfies the equation
DS:.!
TD-f-
so,gd,P
and reduces to the identity matrix as an initial condition, then, denoting the inverse tensor with a minus unity superscript,
60111101
=NON
r
ofcRi
t
fD4,
_e
oft
as before it is readily found from the transformation laws that
and that ofaTlec
D
t
Dt
CAD". jTe, 548;
T
rpTat('
=-r" Si s -41p
andD r...
WWI
t
Since by Ricci's theorem and the above (II ,iekts.0, raising andt.1
lowering of indices commutes with the operation of Jaurnann
differentia-tion.
The above results Call be put in a simpler appearing form by
introducial a further tensor &, defined by
R
sISS1bof!
.p
dXi
thenD
CDc:3 (4) aridR"4
or
-where R2 Is equal initially to the identity matrix. Thus S is the tensor
rotating the material bass vectors Ni into the material base vectors
roc and R is the tensor rotating the material base vectors
ra
into the fixed base vectors g. As has been shown by Goddard and
Miller (l965), R corresponds to an orthogonal transformation, and
hence its inverse and transpose are equ ivaleato Thus the Jaumann
observer would measurl.n.with respect to the base 'vector .
..._. a.
...
rotating locally with the same rate as the vorticity,, ioea moving.
with the principal. axes of The length of -these base. Vectors changes:
also, but not directly with the material.. Inversion of the derivative, again follows readily from the definition; if now
then and OEM 4=11111=1 -Fes
t.
Jr.st
Cs i')di
)aegd
aix' am'
Rs;
7Sit
S
c't 69t'd
e0 Oil
VIIV
/\
j
tidt'
) X ) anr
=
the initial conditions on R.. being imposed at time t' - A material of type C' could now be defined by
,t
=2\
(1)(t--C)R!"'t!Kd
(xi i.)01i3,
(5)Pc.1' -G4i4 t,
j
'$111We note that equation (5) is the constitutive equation presented by Goddard and Miller (1966), their integration being presented by other
arguments. No simple relation has so far been 'found relating the
various Oldroyd and Jaumann integrals.
II. Governing equations
The solution for steady flow between stationary parallel plates
is next presented for materials of type A' , B' , and C' . The
stability problem for parallel flows is then formulated for each by superimposing a wavy infinitesimal disturbance on the primary flow and then determining under what conditions this disturbance will grow.
Cartesian coordinates are used, the z-axis and the y-axis being
chosen parallel and perpendicular to the plates, respectively. For the
--steady flow the velocity components are assumed in the form
T.J=
v.
0) -\"1
with W = 0 at y
+h. By inspection the motion isxi. y,
) coldprimed coordinates denoting the position of a particle at time t' The
only non-zero component of the rate of deformation is
9
dZ3
1" DW*.)where D represents differentiation with respect to y. The non-zero
displacement gradients and rotation components are
LE12.
(t-tlIDTA1)
R.1.1
1
) Rz2. =33
= cos
ay,d z WO.
R32.
Substitution of these into equations (2), (3) and (5) and the equations of motion yields the non-zero partial stress components and velocity as shown in Table I, where
By,
N(r)
= (6)and
14:c0rNft)[1+
(7"Dvi)fOter
, (7)Hence, fluids A' , B' , and C' all predict different normal stresses.
Normal stress differences are consistent with the sudden expansion or contraction of the stream when some non-Navier-Stokes liquids
suddenly emerge from a tube into the atmosphere (the Merrington
effect, which would occur in A' and C') as well as with the differences
in the shape of the free surface for such different liquids undergoing
)
TABLE I
Velocity and Stresses for primary flow of materials A',
B', and C',
I .._ XX 0 o o PYY -2B1(DW)2 0 -2J1 (DW)2 1 Pzz 0 2B 1(DW) 2 2J1 (DW)z 1 Pyz BoDW- .
BoDW J10 DW P -a-E z - 2B (DW)2 3z 1 aP 1 aP 1z - 2J1
(DW)2 cm z 3z W 2 Wo(1 -h z 2 Satisfies DWJi
vrY--h
o(i
-i ) o Bz -ap iz-BD2W o BD2W o (J1 -2J2DW) DzW o 2 yz-Collette flow (the Weissenberg effect, which would also occur in At
and C'). Only C' shows a variable effective viscosity,
In the development of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation (the
stability equation for Navier-Stokes liquids), consideration is limittd
to a disturbance that corresponds to a velocity field which is both
temporally and spatially (in t) periodic, Subject to this limitation,
Squire (4933) has shown that it is sufficient to consider a disturbance that correSponds to a two.dimen.sional velocity field, In the
visco-,,,
elastic case, only such disturbances will be considered also, althougli
no proof of the sufficiency of this exists for these fluids, (In fact,
Listrov (1966) has shown that at least for a Stokesian fluid three dimensional disturbances are less stable than two dimensional
disturbances.) Accordingly, the disturbance velocity components are taken in the form
LA*.
0) lf*
E")(),4
c,,x*(0( )E.
where E exp iA(z CO; A is the (real) wave number, and c the
(complex) wave speed.
We first derive the stability equation for materials At and B',
The total displacement is assumed to be the sum of the primary flow displacement and the displacement resulting from the disturbance,
namely, and sOPS MIO J
11=-1+
c(t)-I:2
-{W(&+k,(1,
11 1) ,Taking
14:1
1.)E"
and similar expressions for and k. since
0)
the solutions are readily obtained as
4:
v/LA
C))
CN6.+1(1)1/
-
DC,,)
IA (w-C))
(-h,
1,Dv-
vD1.,}iA(v.C),
--uple,i)14\(w-c),
=
}lc
A (WC.),
t
A
Expanding all quantities about values at time t it follows that to the lowest order and art(' 1.7 E ( 1
-A
(\AT-
C)
}Ad
17Dw
(t- -t )
c' A ("Cr--.6)
alr
At, Al(w_c.-211E-F),
(9)ere F
exp iA(C-W) (t-t').If consideration is restricted to a short time interval, then
eqtzations (8) and (9) can be approximated by expanding F in a power
series in (t-t') and retaining only the first order terms, Hence,
H-V),
A
Thest are the expressions used by Walters (1962). The more general forrifs given by equations (8) and (9) will, however, be used here,
We note also that equations (8) and (9) are well-behaved at the
critical point where W and C have the same value, Applying the limiting process W4C results in
13
Making use
{Dler*
°Lrof the continuity equation,
displacements can thus be written as
(
-
1?(14-1)Etr-tw.
8.7 (1-r)
c A (N-T -
c).'
1the non-zero derivatives of the
and
a
41
ow* (AV
C2:711\'41.
To the same approximation used for the displacements the non-zero
rate of deformation components at time t' are
d
=ci4z
thiEF
and and -4 C(i41-1)
1,00
4cW
zptf
E(f-f)
C"siiirE
(t-t12
in agreement with the limit as t approaches t to the order of the
linear terms in t-V.
The nonzero rate of deformation components at time t are
-
811z
E.
Ct.VN
utw
6:(1.-F1
t
A (14---c.
341
1.7E (1.-F)
- )a`vpvire'q-v)
TN,"C
-V(t
.1111\ .011.111Combining these result
'OW F
t
t
a)cow
(Dif
1.71)1dt")
(v
irstv
nvo
\,,Temw-c)
(1DWII C2.0vDVer
-s with the con-stitut (equation (2)) leads to the disturbance stresses
15
E:(3.-F")
2.-tr(o-wr
C L)
1.
iye equations tor A'
2. I<tif -2 A D-W
-
Ty,-
OW -r
and
The functions itn (y), are generalizations of Walters' constants and
are defined by 00
plot
1--(Kt*
K21.101.11-+zko'
2.(Dwri.p,(w-c)(
KA
+2,tDWVIAT(VeS12.*K2'2)
Z (10-W13
t(\ic33 )
t A DW K1115,th
A(r)Rzi. LA(vi-cYcl" dr.
(10) 0Upon considering the equations of motion, one obtains, after subtracting the equations satisfied by the velocity components of the
primary flow and eliminating the pressure by cross-differentiation,
, (11)
= 4. A
D p
,(15+A)
1.1..In order to write equation (11) in terms of non-dimensional variables, the following dimensionless functions of y are introduced
K1; /Wo
=
Kti-v0/61,-(1
r
) 123= K3etwo51(01,,s.
11
Putting these and the previous expressions for 10
p
andY yz
into equation (11) results in
(
0,(1)tfu-
cef; u
c)(2 DU)
-0(13-c)[31)U
-
2.00W- c\P31t1*-IT
(LT
(DUr
(15
2,04:T1J-VdeDIT-+
{ 4pv(00 DUI. r317)4,e(IT-cttj
43(t'U)101),-[..0(U-c.)'
4-(
c)
-ttirj
2 Ge (Dif F.3 t:T.LEI
)(tz)
where a is the non-dimensional wave number Ah, c is the
non-dimensional wave speed C/Wo , U is now the non-dimensional primary
flow velocity, W/W09 and l) represents differentiation with respect
to the non-dimensional y For a Navier-Stokes liquid all the p
are zero except p
and equation (12) would then reduce to theOrr-Sommerfeld equation.
Walters (1962) has suggested that for some viscoelastic
called "Slightly viscoelastic9" it is reasorialbe to expect the CT) to .
-where and
i
[(LIAV-041 DIUI
1541-4cA
(V-0Jr-v--4-e Dili
/
se
R
(/2
0 1111which-is the equation given by Walters.
Two remarks are appropriate. Equation (12) was derived
with-out specifying the form of W(y) and hence is not restricted to the
primary flow here considered. Also, if equation (3) (the constitutive
equation for material B') had been used in.-place of equation (2) (the
constitutive equation for material Al), the resulting equation for v
would have been exactly equation (12) - a perhaps surprising result,
vanish rapidly as T increases,
This is the justification he gave forusing the approximate forms for equations (8) and (9) This is
equiva-lent to replacing the upper limit in the expressions for the pn by a finite limit (say T) which may even be quite small, Assuming
44
rri
everywhere in the flow field and neglecting allThe stability equation for the C' material is -developed in much
the same way. For the perturbation velocities, the solution to equation
(4) is found to be, to the order of the linearization,
R
k
cosk.,(t-ttlp\"714- EH siY\'t4F-(t-d1)141
"
R
z= -
sieriDV.]
Co5DWI)
where(1- F)
(H
AV'
27.7f7Ctinkt.m" 1:ANi-c))
't A
D'If
+
(t-
'al:tikr
A (WC)
From equation (5), the disturbance stresses are
33.7-
VI--)\el".2,0M-13.4kCA
pzz=
4 if
313,1)1,+2.0/4
P\(\W-C)I-111
4 DIV
it---(C1,44-,C) (12^0-
Jon
)
(t3)'4--
'14
AL10kt6r-C) 41.1D-41.414
[0\(w.CarRLI,
)6W
+ (A
where 2.1)1,4
Li,. Du
Jr--41
(
1-
L(vo
LAW-C)
LI:=7.c,"rN(1-) t144.AKT-c17.T
(en-c.1)7-rdr,
(LS)Because of the complexity of these stress terms we do not write out the stability equation here, but consider the appropriate approximation in the next section.
III. Asymptotic Solutions
An approximate solution to the stability equation (12) for the
primary flow U 1 - y2 is next obtained, The determination of the
characteristics equation for a Navier-Stokes liquid is first briefly discussed in Part A, the procedure used being that presented by
Graebel (1966) with only slight modifications. The counterpart
characteristics equation for viscoelastic liquids A' and B' is next
presented in Part B , and the procedure used to actually solve this
characteristic equation and to determine the points on the neutral
stability curve is presented in Part Co
Viscoelastic liquid C' is
dis-cussed in Part Do
A. The Determination of the Characteristic Equation for a
Navier-Stokes Liqu id
It is anticipated that both c and 1 /alct will be small for the
case of interest, which suggests a solution in terms of matched
asymptotic expansions. The flow region is first divided into an inner
and an outer region., The inner region is a strip that includes the
where U(y) = c
. The outer region extends from the inner regionto the centerline between the plates at y = 0 which, as a result of the symmetry of the geometry ad equations, serves as the other boundary.
It is assumed that the two regions overlap.
The procedure is to obtain a solution valid in the inner region and a solution valid in the outer region and then to merge the two
solutions. The inner solution is made to satisfy the boundary conditions
at y
-1 and the outer solution the conditions at y a0 The mergingthen produces a characteristic equation which gives a as a function of
R and c
the plot of a versus R for co = 0 being the neutral stabilitycurve.
In the inner region v is obtained by introducing the change in variable (coordinate stretching)
and by putting
VI
(.4?(J/A
=r'(")(1) -1.-/A2(1'
(+-
-where p. is a function of aR r, expected to be small, but unknown at
this point.
Substitution of the above into equation (11) with all of the
Rn
for n I set equal to zero suggests that the proper choice for
p.
Dz. tiaG
0(1: (1.2)
2((°1
(aR)-1/3 and equation (12) becomes
+
[cefto)
tz:L1:oto) 0( 1.4' °( 17- ok.;((1) TYC3c.+
21 J P. is -= ,andi((1) are the solutions of and Hence:, and where
ry
(o)N.3
-.M=0 (4)Lb
DU
220)
citv
Cci6G11C,14( Due
kfr( 002..(.v((DU,
3
11 io3
2_ /7. (21 r3
xl
P.
H(1) and H(2) are Hankel functions of order one-third. Since
h2
increases exponentially with large positive sit at a much faster rate
than does the outer solution,, .2(.4(°) cannot be merged with the outer
solution and is therefore discarded.
For(1)
0( we have9
Graebel (1966) gives the 'solutions for ?((:) and 2e31) as
(121'
2. (
DUc).413 c PO 0110:d4S
(LDUc\l/3T,s
,s3]
and where where 7(kr
M=11 .01, 0=00rod)
(13it__
963
3
i°
(DUG)S413
10(DU)
tol
÷ v
rya)
2.0 Uc
3 . 4 (" 2_(0,
39 /60 (DUcli
-
oi67g9
) For larget
23 en 62730
(DUc).4
Oi 390
'9 9=
and
where
-
A1
and
In the outer region v is obtained by introducing the expansion
li`;:(1)
A=
1n +3 (v).+11y)-+-4-)Ay,#,. +Du,
-
A,
(Ank3)(n
Luc
13-
, 13 E`)2 1-cjc. -1:etz k c, )Cf),c,/A)
v`°)()-A-i(r)
Substituting this into equation (12) gives
(-u-cl(v---01./)-u(°)
-
(0)u-- o)
and v(0) v(n)
for all n such that 0((p.))
0(43). The Tollmiensolutions (1936) are
and
In the inner region Graebel used
where the. C. are arbitrary constants,' For the ;inner and outer solu--i
tioni to merge for large positive it theproper choice is 1,fu for
to
1n4 for t
a and1 for eIn the outer region v is given by
1 2°
n
zetFi.
li( (1)
CL
2c'
1)-6,
+AR +OGA
/
tA,
$.
wheile A is' a constant that Cannot be determined until higher order
terms are considered. fZt.0) decreases exponentially with large
positive r( and hence, tao terms are needed to merge with it.'
The boundary conditions are
ooi
D3v=
If V is an even function of y, orv 0
25 0.14t.
(0)-3)
if v is an odd function. of The Orr.Som,merfeld equation
D
allows .separation into, even and odd parts when U is an even function
of y; since v in the outer region satisfies second order equation.
D
a
which is even in y, satisfaction of only one boundary condition at
y 0 is sufficient. Using symmetrical disturbances since they are
less stable than asymmetrical disturbances, the boundary conditions
give
DF
r
I °BUG
t
CI)C1
Cz
2C(3°)zCz
to the lowest nontrivial order In pa , where (1+ ydip.
and Z s yc a For the existence of a non.trivia/ solution,
DT.Jc DPI
I/ (30) ( vci) 73. I-2.1)ri. CIO)
-vco'4
(Ai 6 tgZ Z /p, 1which is the characteristic equation obtained byPraebel. The plot of
a vs R. for c.
0 obtained from this, however, does not contain thecharacteristic loop of a neutral stability curve, but gives only the lower
branch of the curve. This shortcoming is explained by considering the
magnitudes of the 1) terms in the inner expansion, which in turn
requires some knowledge of a With Lin.'s (1945) results
2a 5, H. oPe, 1/20) as a guide it appears that 2(0) does not
adequately describe the solution near y a -1, for Im(14:(2/))
ft 0.3
as compared with the
1420)
0 aThe real parts of pr I)
and2
and
c,
1/4-31p1( 1 )' are however small compared to .(0) and '
it'
respectively,2 1 2
and
4(1)
3 is small compared to V3°'. Thus by including the It.A1) termsthe imaginary part of #2(2 is altered significantly, this additional term apparently being responsible for generating the loop in the stability
curve, It seems then that a better choice for the solution in the inner
region is
. For merging eqUation (16) with the outer solution, again the
?Toper choice is 114 for 1n
for si
and for ,0 .as before,Then v(y) in the outer 'region is given,.by
Substituting the appropriate boundary
161
as* CIF*,
(zCtFi
'
Dric.
conditions leads toDue
Cz(1.
2c(vti):
to)ct
ot?c13.1(111ot7(m(i)
vut
r
otfr(&I
q
( el)
Du, t
Oct),
1 1 (/
v(i
c1 (
and
I
c:0(Ri z DUc
eUc.
+
R'i (DWI z4
4pi
VIRt t..tRzaDV,[12.co(k2J-u-,
okz R3
(u}*
1)2.
R-liRz-2,11.0
Dq{Le,Dzu,
+ 3 °( RAIL
(DUcri a(zz+
'8 '1)
R.71
I
R4. -3,0( R,-,21-cr,
jR5:11-C3c-qcor 0( R6
(11L7c)11d\
al
±
where D
"tr
a DzIU evaluated at yyc These are valid in the
neighborhood of the critical point for any distribution function that
vanishes as T becomes large, specifically for N(T ) negligible when
T where liA(W-C)Tli d< 1.
A change to a stretched variable and inner and outer expansions
are introduced ss in part A. When all these are substituted into
equation (12), the stability equation in. the inner region is now modified
and thus to the characteristics equation
a
(i4 42(2.(1160-1
IDUL14#
ctruJDF110-ziAkt7,11)R,(4,)
z10 2
E(t01+11)Ucpq(i'yait)(
dl
29
The plot of a versus R resulting from this does have a loop and the
equation is essentially that used by Lin, although he elected to express
the outer solution as an expansion in powers of a2 . With present
computers the expansion in terms of the coordinate rather than a2
seems to be much simpler and more accurate.
13. The Determination of the Characteristic Equation for a Visccelastic
Liquid of Type A orB'
Fez a viscoelastic liquid which does not depart too drastically
from a Navier.Stokes liquid the solution of equation 00 can be carried
out in a manner analogous to the solution presented in part A. Specifi.=
cally, it is anticipated that in equation (12) both lc I and .E) /a I will
be emall. Hence, the flow region can be divided into an inner and an
outer region as previously done.
In the inner region the P can be expressed as series in z by
expanding the denominators arid then integrating term by term. The
and thus whore CA:12' 21
641X")
4.) Lic
a 0,
7.A t: 0(8
DC/c,
otlX.
oul
(AlLL7c.
d't
1
a °It
(o)'er(DUe((
or960
(.:0( DUe.
where ualki, The outer equation is unchanged. Since the term
containing R1 multiplies the fourth derivative, Xi and 242 remain as
in part A. Taking E to be small but still of larger order than H.
is approximated by ( dz2,,(01 .0 t 18)
)
(19) Iand
where
ei*
r di (i6idr(4
D Lic
d
e,r)DU,
'?CO)
Then So is the same as in Part A, and 3
(
da'4
fr(
cht.'
114-).
Thus for the solution in the inner region, Xi and 2(i2 as given in Part A
are used and Oo E(/), is used for 2(3°
Because of the additional linearization introduced by equation
(19), the present results are limited to small E and serve mainly-to
indicate a trend. For larger values of E the perturbation scheme used
to solve equation (18) may not be adequate. In this case, one would have to resort to an exact solution of equation (18) as presented in the
Appendix.
Since the outer solution remains unchanged and (.3 is not
directly involved in the merging, the characteristic equation retains
the same form as equation (17), the only difference being ?(3 is now
given by equation (19).
Ca Solution of the Characteristics Equation
For caleulation pruposes, it is convenient to introduce the change
in variable
31
7
(0
Then the left hand side of equation (17) becomes
a
( (J°1( 6(1 where The functionsh1 and 1.1,2 are discussed, and tables of h1 and h2 and
their derivatives are given in A=4E611945). Putting x
I S
It folio:NS that (". + 8214
s
(zoo )7"1
vroo (20)lp \ 1f
Ct 11 tt i 11) A 1 :1::s
°g s),..Tx113(3711(1.c=-11
11 il1Al
A 19 k4(1: 5i 4 Apic-::---:.cis
Z .-t- ylifi 5,il
AzevItt -S2
zoo)''
"c?)(zoo
(21)3
and where MOO.
(2.00y.,
A0
2!3/11( v3)
)2.00/4,4,113,(3t4,-1),
.sgf Looya.Vv,41.are also tabulated
For the integration indicated on the left hand side of equation (20)
the above series were integrated term by term for S
5 For"S > 5
the integration was continued numerically using Simpsonls rule' and the asymptotic expansion ofhl until there were no noticeable
changes, in the value of the integral in the seventh significant figure. These asymptotic expansions are
_) it)
5)
S
e
Cos
(4
I 3 r
+
2. ) ) 33(tV"S
(zoo)4"'
,-.2:6/31"3rA
3,-- an 644.4
/3wi
(30,141)2(-1V".41
and
1-11(,
s)
^-
S
5-Y514-1
1311"
÷
where
5
=(lri)Vi/ ,,f7F
and 11Lar
4,
The result, of the integration are
c:4-5
k()
oso43 41
I. (61-N+512.00)Lv4-41+-1 Z.
(-1)"
S7-31-
(6>m+ 4S)4,
(-Jr"'
<(..vvx*2-(c0tA442) (2-00)2"-
'3 7(5
c'
,c1-S
RA. ki(cs)
-
0:29099Z
-,r0,5o+361
( (40M+45-K6W"0(2-00)"."
I3 I (6m, ++4'41+,51
(2062'3-(-1)-"a2.0.1
,r4A,A,3 ?A
and s =
?73588
9Q0+r0'
C6w14-7-1 (W0)4"
vvt=a"
1(-1.)
13.2e.4i
3 1
((at-1+s)
(2.00)"41-((ow+i)
(2007---,;(11,11,1,G-s)=
6.6786i-o
o.
3.5.- s)e -S
f_
C(-1)-2.1c9.,1-3)(zoor-oi
Bzw,+t
I ko kv14-5-161,14+6(ZO01
A
zim.11
-t4IG
v14#2..)(2,0 60A.14.-z 35k(1
1Y1
For given values of X and c the solution of equation (20) was obtained by plotting the real part against the imaginary part for each
side. The intersections of these two families of curves gave a andli
R. was computed from
Vc.
R
Dxu` (
)3
The results are shown in Figure 1. The graph for X st 0 which corresponds to a Navier.Stokes liquid, is seen to be in close agreement with Lis results, and the preceeding statements regard= lag the anticipated silts of the various parameters are seemingly coa.
iliiitdirst with the final results. The results are qualitatively in
agree-ment with those of Chan Man Fong and Walters, shown also in Figure 1,
(The X in their paper is defined as five times the value of the present
ene4 ) The quantitative disagreement of the two results is not
under-stood; it is noted, however, that Chan Man Fong and Walters results
for Ka 0, departing considerably from the results of Lin, do agree
with the results of Stuart (1954). On this basis, it is believed that the
present regeWts are tilt more accurate, ones,
D. The Stability of a Viscoelastic LicelidaLTIELS!
Introducing stretchsd coordinates again as in part B, rear the critical point the stresses become
ovu
z.D\A,/, p--"3
+
(4-)
110 1CL4142,(misTej
L..J
2.2 2.( 0,7 0:6 0.5 0.4 ,41 t-,12 )3, /14 \
\
\
37'NEUTRAL STABILITY CURVES
X=0.005,
X=0
CHAN MAN FONG,,I3 'WALTERS '41965)
000,00. UN (1945)
PRESENT RESULTS
X=,02
i
1 IL II 1 5 II I, 1111 tiL V "I ti II: ili
115 ,16 17 18 119 20 211 22, 23 24 25 '26 27 28, 29 30, 31 32
R 1/3
Figure 1: Neutral stabdlity curves for various, values of X..
1.8 (1 1 7 1.51 1 3 a'2 1.2 09' X 0 02 X =0.015 I 1.9 16 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.3 I I 2.0
5500 ,1 5000 4500 Rcr 4000 3500 3000
Figure 2. Critical Reynolds number versus the parameter Ri. ^
2500
0 2 3 4
1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 IL 2 a2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 C.030 C.0.29 C.0.27 Figure 3.
Neutral stability curves and curves of constant c for various values of X..
12 13 14 15 17 16 18 19 R 113 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
_
v. I
DWc OV,
_
ID21,\T",
j43c.
iA
'OVA jiac
-3,1c
+
(tMe-r Cnc.
11-J3t.))1
4-
a
c; AVAT,
0( v)
where the subscript appended to the Jrn-,;
Idicates
that they arem
evaluated at y; the J
's and Km s have been assumed to be all ofc n
the same order of magnitude The parameter is defined by
where
p
D'Wa. ((WW1= r
w°1-) wce
D\J.c.c
Making the distances and velocities dimensionless as before, and
defining
Ji
lc+J4
2. 1 C.
333c
(Ilap.,
I_I)
substitution of these stresses into equation (11) along with use of the equation for the primary flow results in
D Cfc 07712.(12"11 Cr
DIU
ttr%
(
DUc
t z
(vu-c
0--jc.
R,13-5
6137)-4-0( ',4z)
0.
4
533c.(.
17-18 (
40-7
Proceeding further as in cas.e.B, with
61.
cKiAkit
)62= sy,f Nt)
we have now
tuc)
1:ttpq
11 t..6zDU
c (II
43 (.) 3 (22)as the governing equation in the inner region. It is seen then that if
4,0 and oz are bath small compared to unity, but larger that
1s.
again ?(.(0) and Vt°) remain u.nchanged, but a first approximation to
C:2
23(0)
2(
(.03) 62 izDuc)
4,0+
where
cOo, 4)1 are as given in part B.
Away from the critiaal region, the invisctd equation will again
hold, but the primary velocity profile is of course different from the
parabolic one, (For the model typified by equation (1) with M N 1
and Lt LtC for instance, DW satisfies a cubic equation where the
coefficients are linear functions of y.) Comparing a fluid of type A'
(or 10 with type C' if N and piaz are the same for both cases, the
fluid of type C' will have a steeper velocity profile than the parabolic
one, To carry out the details of the solution, it is necessary to specify
N. When this is known, W can readily be found by numerical methods,
and equation (17) then used to determine the neutral stability curve,
-BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Annals of the Computation Laboratory of Harvard University,
Volume II, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1945,
Chan Man Fong, C_ F., and Walters, K., "The Solution of flow
problems in the case of materials withfnemory, Part 11,"
Journal de Mechanique 4, 1965, 439-453o
3, Goddard, J. D., and Miller, C., "An inverse for the Jaumann
derivative and some applications to the rheology of viscoelastic
fluids," Rheologica Acta 5, 1966, 177-183,
4. Graebel, W. P., "On the determination of the characteristic
equa-tions for the stability of parallel flow," Journal of Fluid Mechanics
24, 1966, 497-508.
Jaumann., G., "Geschlossenes System physikalischer und chemischer Differenzialgesetze," Sitzber, Akado Wise, Wien (Ha) 120,
1911, 385-530,
Lin, Co C., "On the stability of two dimensional parallel flows,"
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 3, 1945, 277-301.
Listrov, A. T., "Parallel flow stability of non-Newtonian media,"
Soviet Physics, Dok.l, 10, 1966, 912.914,
Oldroy& J. G., "On the formulation of rheological equations of
state," Proceedings of the Royal Society (A) 200, 1950, 523-541,
Oldroyd, J. G., "Non-Newtonian effects in steady motion of some idealizedelastioo-viscousliquids," Proceedings of the Royal
Society (A) 245, 1958, 2.78-297.
Sokolnikoff I, S., Tensor Analysis John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,
New York, 19510
Squire, H. B., "On the stability for three-dimensional disturbances
I
70.,
Stuart, J. T., Proceedings of the Royal Society (A) 2219 1954,
189-205.
Tollmien, W., "General instability criterion of laminar velocity
distributions," Technical Memorandum 792, NAGA, 1936.
Walters, K., "The solution of flow problems in the case of materials
with memory, Part I," Journal de Mechanique 2, 1962, 479-486.
143
Writing and with solutions
at
P(IhZ4
APPENDIXco
e ,e
-av
the equatiOn for f is the confluent hype rgeometric form
z
z
=3)
An exact solution of equation (1,8) is possible and has in fact,
been given by Chan Man Fong: and Walters (i465). A. modified and 'More
complete version of their results is presented here to ,shOw. its use in the present method.
Equation (18) is of the form.
4X
_2./2
e
and where , em.y.p
--csz
sjds
e
r(g
r
if-2-
e
u
:"U+1
2,71. OQ gAs z approaches ioo U(z) approaches z and V(z) approaches
zeg
This suggested that U must be the solution correspondingto X3 and V to 2(4
To verify that this is indeed the case, replacev in equation (23) by 1 / -1 s \FT%) Then in the limit as X. approaches
zero with arg z 1T and p 2w/3,
r(c) (-1)
eZU(-2)
Doe-P
ex.pLls-idi
+
(
-or upon expressing the integral in. terms of Hankel functions,
x-vt
(-1)'
e:
a/2-UrU
211
-
( -571(t -`,4 d4,1(1-)}-2I -4-i
X4Idiz(Y( '444-1)1j
WA 2 (1)
\
3 e
H[ z
143 3 45 CLzr41
2 a+1)
-0"
olv
?(
and using this (D) in the characteristics equation (17).
3
This is the desired result apart from a multiplicative constant. Thus
the general form of eg(0)
3 for arbitrary X is given by integrating
e
Drf.lzDISTRIBUTION LIST
(One copy unless noted otherwise)
Chief of Naval Research Chief, Bureau of Ships
Department of the Navy
Washington, D.C. 20360
Department of the Navy
Washington, D.C. 20360
Attn: Code 438 Attn: Code 300
Code 463 Code 305
Code 466 Code 335
Code 341
Commanding Officer Code 342A
Office of Naval Research Code 345
Branch Office Code 420
495 Summer Street Code 421
Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Code 44o
Code 442 Commanding Officer Code 634A
Office of Naval Research
Branch Office Chief, Bureau of Naval Weapons
219 S. Dearborn Street Department of the Navy
Chicago, Illinois 6o604 Washington, D.C. 20360 Attn: Code R
Commanding Officer Code R-12 Office of Naval Research Code RR
Branch Office Code RRRE
207 W. 24th Street Code RU
New York, New York 10011 Code RUTO Commanding Officer (25) Commander
Office of Naval Research Military Sea Transportation Service
Branch Office Department of the Navy
Fleet Post Office Box 39 Washington, D.C. 20360
New York, New York 09510
Special Projects Office
Commanding Officer Department of the Navy Office of Naval Research Washington, D.C. 20360
Branch Office Attn: Code 001
1050 E. Green Street Code 201
Pasadena, California 91101
Chief, Bureau of Yards and Docks Commanding Officer Department of the Navy
Office of Naval Research Washington, D.C. 20360
Branch Office Attn: Code D-202
1076 Mission Street
Commanding Officer and Director
David Taylor Model Basin
Washington, D.C. 20007 Attn: Code 500 Code 515 Code 520 Code 521 Code 522 Code 580 Code 589 Superintendent U. S. Naval Academy Annapolis, Maryland 21402 Attn: Library
Commanding Officer and Director
U. S. Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory
Port Hueneme, California 93041 Commanding Officer and Director
U. S. Navy Mine Defense Laboratory
Panama City, Florida 32402 Commander
Naval Ordnance Test Station China Lake, California 93557
Code 4052 Code 5014 Code 753 Officer in Charge
Naval Ordnance Test Station Pasadena Annex 3205 E. Foothill Boulevard Pasadena, California 91107 Attn: Mr. J. W. Hoyt Research Division Code P508 Code P804 Code P807 Code P80962 Superintendent Director (6)
Naval Research Laboratory
Washington, D.C. 20590
Attn: Code 2027 Commanding Officer
NROTC and Naval Administrative Unit Massachusetts Institute of
Tech-nology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Commanding Officer
U. S. Naval Underwater Ordnance
Station
Newport, Rhode Island
Attn: Research Division
Commander
U. S. Naval Weapons Laboratory Dahlgren, Virginia 22448
Attn: Tech. Library Div. (AAL) Commander
Boston Naval Shipyard
Boston, Massachusetts 02129 Commander
Charleston Naval Shipyard U. S. Naval Base
Charleston, South Carolina 29408
Commander
Long Beach Naval Shipyard Long Beach, California 90802
Commander
Mare Island Naval Shipyard Vallejo, California 94592
Defense Documentation Center (5) Cameron Station
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Commander
Commander Pearl Harbor
Navy No. 128, Fleet Post Office San Francisco, California 96614 Commander
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard Naval Base
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112
Commander
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03804
Attn: Design Division Commander
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Bremerton, Washington 98314
Commander
San Francisco Naval Shipyard San Francisco, California 94135 Commander
Air Force Cambridge Research Lab.
L. G. Hanscom Field
Bedford, Massachusetts 01751
Attn: Research Library, CRMXL-R
Air Force Office of Scientific Research Mechanics Division
Washington, D.C. 20333 Director
U. S. Army Engineering Resarch
and Development Laboratories
Fort Belvoir, Virginia
Attn: Technical Documents Center
Commanding Officer
U. S. Army Research Office--Durham Box CM, Duke Station
Durham, North Carolina 27706
Commander
Hq., U. S. Transportation Research and Development Command
Transportation Corps
Fort Eustis, Virginia
Commander
Hq., Ti. S. Transportation Research
and Development Command Transportation Corps
Fort Eustis Virginia
Attn: Marine Transport Division
Commandant
U. S. Coast Guard
1300 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C.
Superintendent
U. S. Merchant Marine Academy Kings Point, L. I., New York
Attn: Department of Engineering Director of Research
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Headquarters
600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20546
Attn: Code RR
Director
Langley Research Center
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Langley Field, Virginia
Coordinator of Research Maritime Administration
441 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20235
Division of Ship Design Maritime Administration
441 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20257
Research and Development Maritime Administration
441 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20235
National Academy of Sciences National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418
Dr. G. B. Schubauer
Fluid Mechanics Section
National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20360
Mr. E. S. Turner
National Research Council Montreal Road
Ottawa 2, Canada
Director
Engineering Science Division
National Science Foundation Washington, D.C.
Mr. C. A. Gongwer
Aerojet General Corporation
6352 N. Irwindale Avenue Azusa, California
Mr. W. R. Wiberg, Chief Marine Performance Staff
The Boeing Company Aero-Space Division
P. O. Box 3707
Seattle 24, Washington
Hydrodynamics Laboratory
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California 91109
Dr. J. Laufer
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California 91109 Department of Engineering University of California Berkeley, California 94720 Professor P. Lieber University of California Berkeley, California 94720 Professor M. S. Uberoi Department of Aeroanutical Engineering University of Colorado Boulder Colorado Mr. R. H. Oversmith Hydrodynamics Laboratory Convair
San Diego 12, California Professor A. B. Metzner University of Delaware
Newark, Delaware
Engineering Societies Library
29 W. 39th Street
New York 18, New York
Mr. P. Eisenberg, President
Hydronautics, Inc.
Pindell School Road Howard County
Laurel, Maryland
Professor L. Landweber
Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research State University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa
Dr. C. Elata
Hydraulics Laboratory
Israel Institute of Technology Haifa, Israel
Professor S. Corrsin
Dr. R. H. Kraichnan
Peterborough, New Hampshire
Professor A. T. Ippen
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Professor C. C. Lin
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Dr. B. Sternlicht
Mechanical Technology, Inc.
968 Albany-Shaker Road Latham, New York
Acting Director
St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic
Laboratory
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Professor J. Ripken
St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
Dr. E. R. Van Driest
Missile Development Division
Noth American Aviation, Inc. Downey, California
Dr. T. R. Goodman Oceanics, Inc.
Plainview, L.I., New York Mr. L. M. White
U. S. Rubber Company
Research and Development Department Wayne, New Jersey
Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
74 Trinity Place New York 6, New York
Dr. J. P. Breslin
Stevens Institute of Technology Davidson Laboratory
Hoboken, New Jersey
Transportation Technical Research
Institute
Investigation Office Ship Research Institute
700 Shinkawa Mituka
Tokyo, Japan
Dr. A. Sacks Vidya, Inc.
2626 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California Technical Library
Webb Institute of Naval
Architecture
Glen Cove, L.I., New York 11542 Mr. H. Crawford
Westco Research
Division of the Western Company
1171 Empire Central Dallas 7, Texas
Professor David T. Pratt Engineering Department
U. S. Naval Academy
Annapolis, Maryland 21402
Mr. Ralph Little
Naval Research Laboratory
Washington, D.C. 20390
Attn: Code 6170
Dr. C. R. Singleterry Naval Research Laboratory
Washington, D.C. 20390 Attn: Code 6170 Dr. C. Se Wells, Jr. LTV Research Center Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. P. O. Box 5003 Dallas 22, Texas
Professor S. R. Keim
College of Engineering University of California Davis, California
Mr. W. E. Ferrin
Commercial Exploration Manager
Archer Daniels Midland Company
10701 Lyndale Avenue
South Minneapolis, Minnesota
Office of Research Administration The University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Attn: File Room
Professor R. B. Couch
Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
Professor W. W. Willmarth
Department of Aerospace Engineering The University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan Dr. C. S. Yih
Department of Engineering
Mech-anics
The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
. _UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification FORM 1473 I JAN 64.1, UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification
DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R&D
(Security clastlication of tale, body of abstract and indexing annotation must be ntred when the °vomit report c ia retied)
I. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY (Corporate author)
The University of Michigan
Department of Engineering Mechanics Ann Arbor, Michigan
2a. REPORT SECURI1Ty C LASSWICATFOnj
Unclassified
2b GROUP 3. REPORT TITLE
The Stability of Parallel Plows of Fluids with Memories
4. DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (Typo of report and inc(uive, date.)
Technical Resort
5. AUTHOR(S) (Last name, firer name, initial)
Mook, Dean T.
1
Graebel, W. P, Project Director
6. REPORT DATE
September 1967
' A 'TOTAL NO. OF PAGES
51
7h. NO. OF REFS
--11a. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO,
1 Nonr-1224(49)
b. PROJECT NO 1 NR 062-342
d.
9.5r ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
06505-3-T
oh. OTHER RgPOR'T NOM (Anyothlucturnbera that May be ssiffnad I
1 thi report)
10. A V A ,IL ABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES,
Distribution of this document is unlimited.
II
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12. 'SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY 1
Department of the Navy i
Office of Naval Research
Washington, D.C.
13 ABSTRACT
The equations governing the stability of plane parallel'flows are 11
1
I developed for three models of' fluids with memories. Asymptotic solution 1 Valid for large- Reynolds numbers; are obtained and the effect of the memory
are shown to be destabilizing. The approach to the problem allows evaluation of how fast a memory must fade to allow evaluation of the stresses in power
series in the time interval. An alternate approach to inverting convected, derivatives is also presented.
i , , , I I , 1 -. --- -D
UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification
1. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY: Enter the name and address of the contractor, subcontractor, grantee, Department of De-fense activity or other organization (corporate author) issuing the report.
REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: Enter the
over-all security classification of the report. Indicate whether
"Restricted Data" is included. Marking is to be in
accord-ance with appropriate security regulations.
GROUP: Automatic downgrading is specified in DoD Di-rective 5200.10 and Armed Forces Industrial Manual. Enter
the group number. Also, when applicable, show that optional markings have been used for Group 3 and Group 4 as
author-ized.
REPORT TITLE: Enter the complete report title in all capital letters. Titles in all cases should be unclassified. If a meaningful title cannot be selected without classifica-tion, show title classification in all capitals in parenthesis
immediately following the title.
DESCRIPTIVE NOTES: If appropriate, enter the type of report, e.g., interim, progress, summary, annual, or final.
Give the inclusive dates when a specific reporting period is
covered.
AUTHOR(S): Enter the name(s) of author(s) as shown on or in the report. Enter last name, first name, middle initial.
If military, show rank and branch of service. The name of
the principal author is an absolute minimum requirement.
REPORT DATE: Enter the date of the report as day,
month, year; or month, year. If more than one date appears on the report, use date of publication.
7a. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: The total page count should follow normal pagination procedures, i.e., enter the number of pages containing information.
76. NUMBER OF REFERENCES Enter the total number of
references cited in the report.
8a. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER: If appropriate, enter the applicable number of the contract or grant under which the report was written.
8b, 8c, & 8d. PROJECT NUMBER: Enter the appropriate military department identification, such as project number,
subproject number, system numbers, task number, etc. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S): Enter the offi-cial report number by which the document will be identified and controlled by the originating activity. This number must be unique to this report.
9b. OTHER REPORT NUMBER(S): If the report has been
assigned any other report numbers (either by the originator or by the sponsor), also enter this number(s).
AVAILABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES: Enter any
lim-INSTRUCTIONS
imposed by security classification, using standard statements
such as:
(I) "Qualified requesters may obtain copies of this
report from DDC."
"Foreign announcement and dissemination of this report by DDC is not authorized."
"U. S. Government agencies may obtain copies of this report directly from DDC. Other qualified DDC
users shall request through
"U. S. military agencies may obtain copies of this
report directly from DDC. Other qualified users shall request through
"All distribution of this report is controlled.
Qual-ified DDC users shall request through
If the report has been furnished to the Office of Technical Services, Department of Commerce, for sale to the public,
indi-cate this fact and enter the price, if known.
II. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES: Use for additional explana-tory notes.
SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY: Enter the name of
the departmental project office or laboratory sponsoring (pay-ing for) the research and development. Include address.
ABSTRACT: Enter an abstract giving a brief and factual summary of the document indicative of the report, even though it may also appear elsewhere in the body of the technical
re-port. If additional space is required, a continuation sheet shall
be attached.
It is highly desirable that the abstract of classified reports be unclassified. Each paragraph of the abstract snail end with an indication of the military security classification of the
in-formation in the paragraph, represented as (TS). (s), (C). or (U)
There is no limitation on the length of the abstract.
How-ever, the suggested length is from 150 to 225 words.
KEY WORDS: Key words are technically meaningful terms
or short phrases that characterize a report and may be used as
index entries for cataloging the report. Key words must be
selected so that no security classification is required.
Identi-fiers, such as equipment model designation, trade name, military project code name, geographic location, may be used as key
words but will be followed by an indication of technical
con-text. The assignment of links, rules, and weights is optional
14 LINK A LINK B LINK C
KEY WORDS