Report No. 313 Deift Shipbuild.ing Laboratory
June
1971
Resistance Increase of a Past Cargo
Ship in Regular Waves
by
Prof.ir.. J. Grritsma
and
W. Beukelman
i. introduction,
om linear theory it follows that added resistance in waves is propor-'
tional to the square of the wave height. An accurate experimént with a
model of a passenger-cargo ship,. having a block coefficient of: 0B = 0.65, confirmed the square law to a large extend. Based on this
principle a prediction of the mean added resistance in a specified
irregular sea was in good' agreement with corresponding modél test results (1).
However, Sibul has found large variations in the exponent of the wave height; instead of a constant value of 'two his model experiments
indi-cate values, between 1.1 and 2.5. The average value is between .].7 and L8 for ships with block, coefficients bei ween
o6o
and 0.70 and alength-beam ratio of about
75o
There is a trend towards low exponent values for slender ships with a large ìéngth-beam ratio (2)..To study the deviations from the square law for one particular oase extensive experiments with a model of the fast cargo ship "S.A. van der Stel" were carried out. The tests include wave resistance and motion
tests for a wide range of wave lengths, wave heights and forward speeds.
The influence of surge on the resistance increase in waves was investi-gated in 'addii ion to the wave resistance, experiènced by the model when lt was 'restrained in heave, pitch ard' surge.
The results of the measurements are given in some detail to allow compa-rison with theoretical results,
2. Test conditions and experimental set up.
in table I the considered ranges of' wave height, wave length and ship speed of the model experiment are summarized.
Table i
Wave oonditions
The waves were measured at a distanòe of
4
mt ers In front of the modelby means of a 'two-wire oonducianoe waveprobe. Additional measurements'
were carried out with' a sönic wave probe. (A very satisfaótoryaeement
between -ehe two kinds of measurement was fotthd..)
0..6
1750
0 8
:,.1/50
' 1/40 1/30 1.01/50
1/40
1/30 1.2. 1/150 1/5Q 1/40 1/30 1.4. 'l/5Q
1/40
1/30
1.6.
1/50
1.95
1/5Q
The test set up is given in Figure 1.
The majority of the rims was made
with
thé model restrained in surge,but free to heave and pitch, as shown in Figure la.
The mean resistance in waves was measured by means of strain gauge dynamometers of which the output was integrated over a fixed period of time. A comparison of the results of this resistance measurement method with results of the more conventional system, using a dead weight as
shown in Figure ib, showed only very minor differences.. The
towing
arrangement, given in this Figure was also used to investigate the
in-fluence of surge. on the heaving and pitching motions and on' the added resistance.
The molions of the model were measured by wo low-friction potentiometers. Moderate wave heights were chosen in view of the applicability of the added wave resistance operators for superpositioñ purposes.
3.
Eerimental results.The main,
particulars
of the ship are given in Table2.
Table 2 Nain' particulars LV. S.A. van der Stel
in Figure 2 to. 5 the experimental amplitude and phase characteristics
are compared with the corresponding calculated values. There is some indication of non-linearity in the measured motion amplitude. In pa?ti-cular a tendency to better agreement with the theoretical values in the
case of small wave heights is observed. The influence of surge was
.in-vestigatéd for one speed only: F =
0.25;
the results do not indicatea marked, deviation from the results where the model is free to surge (Figure
4).
I4pp-
152.5m
Lwi154.7 m
B-
22.8m,
T-
9.im
-
17931
-
2431
m2 Ii -2782993
m4 0B - 0,564 o,p -0,580
LCB 1,68 a!t LCF -.4,35
aft Vservice ''19,5 1iots
'kyy
0,219
The added resistance in waves is shown in Figures
6-9
for the modelwhich is free to pitch and heave hut restrained in surge. Also the added
resistance is given for the case where the model is restrained for heave
pitch and surge motions. The results cover the various wave height
con-ditions as sunuitarized in Table 1. in view of the slight non-linearity
of the vertical motions, there is surprisingly little deviation from the squared wave height law. This also holds for the added resistance
of the restrained model. Figure 10 shows that the influence of surge
on the added resistance in waves is negligible. The validity Of the squared wave height law for this particular ship model is clearly shown in Figures 11-14, where added wave resistance for the pitching and heaving model and for the restrained model is plotted on a base of
waie height squarod.
The standard deviation from the assumed quadratic law is in the order
of
3%,
which includes measurements errors as wefl.The experimental results will be used for comparison with calculated
values of the added resistance in waves.
4. Conclusion.
For the considered ship form the resistanöe experiments in waves indicate
that added resistance in waves varies as the wa'.re height squared in the range of wave conditions which was investigated.
5,. References.
(i) Prof.lr. J. Gerritsma, Ir,. J.J. van den BosCh and W. Beuke1nan Propulsion in regular and. irregular waves.
International Shipbuilding Progress 1961
(2) 0.J. Sibul
marease of Ship Résistance in Waves Report NA -
67 - 2, 1967
Resistance
dyna mometer
t
A
a.
Weight
Resistance
dyn a m o met er
i: 5
LC)
Figure 1.
Arrangement
for
resista ncetests
in
D
1.0-o _°__b_ O Oo"
'O
0--
1.0--U)w
w
(D1OO-w
300-O O-- - -. -o u
- - - CALCULATION
--.ce
N
'Jo
o
2= L f50
.EXPERIMENT
WITHOUT.
SURGE\
\
Figure 2
Frequency characteris't ics at
Fn=i5
C
N
o 1.0 U)w
loo
300
A
t
o
o
\
rEe
EXPERIMENT
WITHOUT
SURGE
2= L/150
o
L/5O
o
L/40
= L/30
- CALCULATION
\
Figure 3
VL/x
Frequency characteristics
at
Fn = 20.
1.5 1.0o,,
1,0
1.5-1T
U)w
w
CDw-1:00-
300 300
-- -- -- -- CALCULATION
EXPERIMENT
WITHOUT SURGE
Figure 4
1- e
O
2a
L/50
1.EXPERIMENT
L/40
f
WITH SURGE
'5D D
N
D1.5-i10
U)w
w
w
-300-o
o
o
.
- - CALCULATION
L/150
= L/ 50
= L/ 40
L/ 30
-- O-.. ,Q _-'
s'
EX PE RI M E NTWITHOUT
SURGE'o
0'5
VL/x
2-2a./50 RESTRAINED MODEL.
-- I I I I I i - i - I I i - - t
0.5
1.0 1.5VL/x
t
VLÍx
RESTRAINED MODEL.
\IL/x._:
ç
0.5
VL/x
Figure 9
.Added
res
ance.
in
waves
at
Fr
.30
t
2-0 2a L/52-0
WITH SURGE.
L/40Ç
RESTRAINED MODEL.
WITHOUT SURGE.
1.0 1.5VL/x
'
2
cm2
0
5 1Ocm2
20
25
o 5
.1-cm2
20
25
Figure i3
Added
resistance in waves
X/L =12
-O- WITHOUT SURGE.
i-D- RESTRAINED MODEL.
i
.5
RGE
TRAINED P'IODEL
o
-.
s
Figjf
clecf resistance ¡
M
a
Cm2
Waves
A/Le i4
The test set up is given in Figure 1. L
The majority of the runs was made with the model restrained in surge,. but free to heave and pitch, as. shown in Figure la.
The mean resistance in waves was measured by means of strain gauge
dynamometers of which the output was. integrated over a fixed period of time.. A comparison of the results of this reistanöe, measurement method
with results of the more conventional system, using a dead weight as shown in Figure lb, showed only very minor differences The towing
arrangement,. given in this. Figure was also used to investigate the
in-fluence of surge on the heaving and pitching motions and on the added resistance.
The motions of the model were measured by two low-friction potentiometers. Moderate wave héights were chosen in view of the applicability of the added wave resistance operators for superpositioñ purposes.
3.
perimental results.The main particulars of the ship are given in Table 2.
Table 2
Nain particulars N.y. S,A. van der Std
-
l52.5m
Lwi-
,154.7m
B -.22,8m
T9lm
- 17931 m - 2431 m2 Il - 2782993 m4 CB -0,564
cp
-
0,580 LOB - 1,68 aft LOF4,35
aft Vservice -19,5
knots - 0,219In Figure 2 to 5 the experimental amplitude and. phase dhazracteristios are compared with the corresponding caloiïLated values. There is some ,indloation of non-linearity in the measured motion amplitude. In
parti-cular a tendency.to better agreement with the theoretical values in the
case of small wave, heights is observed. The influence of surge was
in-vestigated for one speed only: F = 0.25; the results do not indicate
a marked deviation from' the results where the módel is free to surge. (Figure