MACCAFERRI Main Head Office: OFFICINE MACCAFERRl S.p.A 40123 Bologna (ltaly) Via Agresti, 6 -P.O. Box 396 Phone: (051) 234303-279701 Cabie: Oabbionimac Telex: 510649-510371 Gabion I
MACCAFERRI Head Offices: MACCAFERRl GABIONS (NC. Head Office and Factory Oovernor Lane Blvd.
Williamsport - Md 21795-USA Phone: (301) 223-6910
CabIe: Maccaferri Manufacturing Williamsport Md
Telex: 292338 Maga UR
MACCAFERRI GABIONS WEST COAST INe. 3650 Seaport BLVD.
West Sacrarneruo, CA 95691 Phone: (916) 371-5892
MACCAFERRI OABIONS OF CANADA LTD. Head Office
797, Don Mills rd.
Don Mills -Ont. M3C IV2 - Canada Phone: (416) 4293380
Cabie: Maccaferri Toronto Telex: 6966885 Gabions Tor
MACCAFERRI OABIÓES DO BRASIL LTDA. Fabrica e escritorio
Rod. Dom Gabtiel Paulino Bueno Couto, km 66 (Antiga Mal. Rondon) CEP 13200 -Jundiaî -SP -Brasil Caixa postal 520 Telefone: 434-5222 Telex: 1179783MOBL BR
RIVER AND SEA GABIONS (LONDON) LTD. Head Office
2,Swallow Place - London WIR 8SQ - United Kingdom Phone: (Ol) 629-8528
Cabie: Gabions London WI Telex: 25326 Gabion 0
Flexible linings
in Reno mattress and gabions
for canals and
canalized water courses
Pre face
Flexible
structures have been usedfor
some time
and with
great success in river and irrigation works,for retaining
walls,
and for the
con trol
ofunstable
areas in mountain
regions. In thefollowing
pages, af ter a briefexamination
ofthe
various
me-thods and materials generally adopted for revetting canals and canalized water courses, a study of liningsformed
with
Reno
mattress and Maccaferri gabions i
s
made.
Other brochures
dealing with the
numerous
otheruses
of the
two products
includ-ing
road
construction, river training, marine
works,
retaining
structures
and thefacing
of
earth-fill dams are
available.
In
this series ofpublications,
we propose
to illustrate
the salient
characteristics of theflexible structure
composed ofthe
Reno
mattress and
gabions
which constitute
the
basis
of our production.
At the same
time, we
wish to provide
information relating
to the behaviour of these structures
in their various fields
of application,
and thereby,
to
suggest criteriafor the selection of
material
andfor structural design.
We
hope that this
brochure
wil/ be
of help to
engineers and technicians
who are
interested
in the study
and in the design of these
works.
We also hope that it may
serve to increase
the
use
ofsuchjlexible
structures
which, we
have
no doubt, offer technical and
economie advantages
over other methods
in many situations.
We
wish
to
express
our
grateful thanks
to Prof
Dolt.
Ing. Alberto
Bizzarri,
Professor of Soil Conservation in
the
Faculty
of
Engineering,
University
of
Bologna,
for his invaluable
assistance
in the
preparation and
editing
of
this edition of the
bro-chure
published in 19
76,
and
in
the study
of
the
test
programme carried
on in Fort Collins (Colorado U.s.A.).
Bologna, January 1985
dolt.
ing. Andrea Papetti
GENERAL MANAGERIndex
Foreword page 9
CHAPTER I General characteristics
1.1
Introdu
e
tion
1.2 General criteria for the design and construction of canals 1.3 Functions and characteristics of canal linings
1.4 Types of revetment page 11
»
11 » 12 »13
CHAPTER 1ICharacteristics of f1exible Iinings of Reno mattress and gabions 2.1 Permeable, ungrouted linings
2.2 Semi permeable and impermeable linings with sand asphalt mastic
page 15
» 23
CHAPTER III
Design and calculation criteria for revetments using Reno mattress and gabions in open channels 3.1 Hydraulic calculation for open channels
3.l.l Flow equations
3.1.2 Values and selection of coefficients of rougbness for Reno mattress and gabions 3.1.3 Types of sections and their hydraulic characteristics
3.2 Dimensioning of revetments using Reno mattress and gabions 3.2.1 Experiments carried out at Fort Collins (Colorado -U.S.A.) 3.2.2 Research method
3.2.3 Revetment stability - Design criteria considering shear stresses 3.2.4 Revetment stability -Design criteria considering water velocity 3.2.5 Deformation evaluation
3.2.6 Velocity at the mattress - base soil interface - Use of filters
3.2.7 Performance of Reno mattress and gabion revetments grouted with sand asphalt mastic 3.2.8 Comparison between Reno mattress revetments and loose stone rip-rap revetments 3.2.9 Design criteria for Reno mattress and gabion revetments
3.2.10 Rapid design methods 3.3 Analysis of the safety factor
3.4 Proteetion of banks against wave action
3.4.1 Designing Reno mattress and gabion bank proteetion revetments against wave action
3.4.2 Programme of tests conducted in Grenoble, France 3.4.2.1 Research methods
3.4.2.2 Analysis of results
3.4.2.3 Comparison between Reno mattress revetments and concrete or loose stone rip-rap linings
3.4.3 Linings for navigation canals
3.5 Examples of calculations for the design of Reno mattress and gabion revetments
page 30 » 30 » 32 » 34 » 37 » 37 » 39 » 40 » 41 » 42 » 43 » 43 » 44 » 45 » 46 » 47 » 47 » 47 » 48 » 48 » 48 » 49 » 50 » 52 CHAPTERIV
Examples of completed works 4.1
Introdu
e
tion
4.2 Works carried out in dry conditions 4.3 Works carried out under water
4.4 Linings grouted with sand asphalt mastic in dry conditions 4.5 Linings grouted with sand asphalt mastic under water
page 58 » 58 » 86 » 96 » 101
6
List of tables
page 12 » 16 » 23 » 25 » 26 » 33 » 34 » 36»
38 » 39 » 39 » 45 Table 1 - Limiting veloeities at bed level for various soils [1,2,3]Table 2 - Standard dimensions of Reno mattress and gabions
Table 3 - lndieative thieknesses of Reno mattress and gabion revetments, as a funetion of water veloeity
[11]
Table 4 -Applieation rates of sand asphalt mast ie for eonsolidating and for sealing Reno mattressand gabions
Table 5-lndieative thieknesses of Reno mattress and gabions treated with sand asphalt mastie, as a funetion of water veloeity [11]
Table 6 - Coeffieients of roughness
Table 7- Side slopes of unlined ehannels [30]
Table 8- Typical eanal seetions and their geometrie hydraulie properties [22]
Table 9 - Dimensions of model-scale and full-seale Reno mattress tested at Fort Collins (Colorado U .S.A.) Table 10 - Measurement taken from test n. 2on a prototype Reno mattress of 0.23 m
Table 11 - Measurement taken from test n. 4 on a model seale Reno mattress of 0.15 m
Table 12- Comparison of the thieknesses of aReno mattress revetment and an alternative loose stone revetment for eertain hydraulie eonditions occurring during the tests at Fort Collins (Colorado U.s.A.)
Foreword
The intention ofthis man uaI istogive basic information and to study some new criteria which has been evolved for the de-sign ofgabion and Reno mattress linings for open channels and canalized waterways.
Recently, tests to full and model scales have been made bythe undermentioned bodies:
- Hydraulic Laboratory Engineering Research Center, Colo-rado State University (Fort Collins - USA)
- Sogreah Ingenieurs Conseils (Grenoble -France) - Delft Hydraulics Laboratory (Netherlands)
The results of the tests and the interpretation ofthem to for-mulate anew approach todesign are discussed in the following pages. Officine Maccaferri S.p.A. consider that the information
given will simplify the work ofengineers involved in the design of gabion linings and their confidence inthe material which, as is weil known, isbeing increasingly used throughout the world.
The major problems encountered in channel design and their solutions are outlined in anumber of actual examples of completed schemes. Construction techniques which will be of interest to contractors are also described.
For a fuller and detailed study of the subject, the reader should refer to the publications and papers listed in the biblio-graphy, At the same time, Officine Maccaferri S.p.A. will be pleased to give assistance in fïnding a solution to any specific problem bymaking available the experience ithas acquired over the last century.
CHAPTERI
General characteristics
1.1 Introduetion
The term "canal" is usually understood to mean an open arti-ficial channel that permits the free flow ofwater. Common uses are for irrigation, drainage, navigation, hydro-electric power and water supply.
This manual deals only with the types of revetment used in canals and canalized water courses.
It does not cover any form of construction concerned with tun-nels or closed conduits.
1.2 General criteria for the design
and construction of canals
In the planning of a canal the numerous elements of design which have to be considered vary in nature according to its pur-pose. The basic and most important ones are the alignment,
longitudinal gradients and, inter-dependent on these, the shape and dimensions of the cross sections.
The course of a canal consists of straight stretches connected by curves.
The choice of route between given upstream and down-stream points must necessarily take into account intervening features such as built-up areas, railways and roads, natural and artificial water courses, ground liable to subsidence, broken terrain or unsuitable soil.
If such obstacles cannot be avoided or if a detour is too long, special works (e.g., inverted syphons, bridges, pumping sta-tions) will be needed, at extra cost, to overcome them.
Canals are either excavated or built above ground with their beds contained between embankments. The cross section is usually trapezoidal, with or without berms, the side slopes de-pending primarily on the type of soil. With unlined banks, the slope can range from a minimum of 1:3 (vertical to horizontal),
for very fine non-cohesive soils to a maximum of 1:
l.5
for com-pact clay.Canals excavated in rock can of course have vertical banks (See Table 7). Other sections which are commonly used, are circular,
triangular and rectangular. Less common ones are polygonal,
parabolic and polycentric.
Having decided on the type and dimensions of the section, and the gradient, the next step is to ensure that the mean velocity of the water remains within predetermined limits, to prevent too rapid silting from material carried in sus pension or erosion of the canal bed and banks. The lower limit, between 0.1and 0.5
mis,
is determined by the type of material carried in suspension, re-ducing with the partiele size ofthe material which may be clay,
chalk, silt or fine to coarse sand. The higher limit depends on the type of soil in the canal bed and banks. It ranges from a mi-nimum of 0.3
mis
for muddy soils to 3mis
or more for sections excavated in rock.Chapter 111 sets out the formulae usually employed in de-signing canals, and contains tables from which the most econo-mical dimensions can be extracted. The reader should refer to that chapter and to the references it cites, for further informa-tion on the design criteria.
1.3 Functions and characteristics
of canal linings
A
linin
g o
n th
e
b
e
d
a
nd/or
o
n th
e s
id
es o
f
a ca
n
a
l
has a
num-b
e
l' o
f e
ffe
c
t
s
,
a
m
o
n
g
th
e
m
t
h
e
f
o
llowin
g:
a)
Reduction of seepage from
or into the canal.
Th
e
probl
e
m
s
of limitin
g
w
a
t
e
r lo
ss ass
um
es g
r
ea
t
irnpor-t
a
nce wh
e
n w
a
t
e
r i
s s
hort or wh
e
n it is
e
xp
e
n
s
iv
e
to bring it t
o
th
e
c
a
n
a
l
.
Th
e ex
tr
a
co
s
t of
a
r
e
v
e
tm
e
nt
to mi nimi
se
th
e
lo
sses
i
s
th
e
n
c
omp
e
n
sa
t
e
d
.
Simil
a
rl
y,
infilt
ra
tion
into
a
dr
a
in
a
ge or
irri
ga
ti
o
n
ca
n
a
l
ca
n b
e a se
riou
s
probl
e
m;
but
,
a
g
a
in
,
th
e
addi
-tional co
s
t of rev
e
tm
e
nt can b
e
balanc
e
d b
y sa
vings in
e
xcava-tion
, as
th
e ca
n
a
l
,
b
e
ing dim
e
nsion
e
d
to
ca
rr
y a s
m
a
ll
e
r flow
,
h
as a s
m
a
ll
e
r
c
r
oss sec
tion
.
Ho
weve
r
, i
n mo
s
t
cases
it i
s
di
f
fi
c
ult to
es
tim
a
t
e
th
e
d
eg
r
ee
of
see
p
age
thr
o
u
g
h th
e
b
e
d
a
nd b
a
nk
s,
wh
e
th
e
r th
ey a
r
e
r
eve
tt
e
d
o
r not.
A co
m
pa
ri
s
on
of
th
e c
o
s
t
s
ofth
e
v
a
riou
s
po
ssi
bl
e
r
e
m
e-di
es
i
s a
l
so f
r
a
u
g
ht with un
ce
rt
a
in
ty.
S
om
et
im
es
,
a ca
n
a
l i
s ex
c
ava
t
e
d without pro
v
i
si
on
fo
r
i
t
s
r
e-ve
tm
e
nt but
a
linin
g
i
s a
dded
s
ub
se
qu
e
ntl
y
when m
eas
urabl
e
l
oss
of w
a
t
er
h
as
b
ec
om
e a
pp
a
r
e
nt. Su
c
h
a
proc
e
dur
e
h
a
s it
s
d
raw
b
ac
k
s
.
Initi
a
ll
y,
th
e c
an
a
l f
a
il
s
to op
e
r
a
t
e a
t full c
a
p
a
cit
y:
late
r th
e c
r
oss sec
ti
o
n m
ay
h
a
v
e
to b
e c
h
a
n
ge
d t
o o
n
e
whi
c
h
wh
e
n r
e
v
e
tt
e
d will
ca
rr
y
th
e
d
es
i
g
n
e
d flow
.
Thi
s a
dd
s g
r
ea
tl
y
t
o
th
e
fin
a
l
cos
t
a
nd d
e
l
ay
s th
e e
ffici
e
nt op
e
r
a
tion of th
e c
an
a
l.
Itis th
e
r
efo
r
e a
dvi
sa
bl
e
to m
a
k
e a
thorou
g
h
s
oil
s
ur
vey
ofth
e
gro
und tr
ave
r
se
d b
y
th
e ca
n
a
l
b
e
for
e
h
a
nd
a
nd pl
a
n for
a
n
y
r
e
-v
e
t
t
in
g
th
a
t m
ay
b
e
r
e
quir
e
d in th
e
d
es
i
g
n
s
t
age.
b) Stabili
s
ation of the
banks.
A
r
eve
trn
e
nt
,
or linin
g,
is u
s
u
a
ll
y
onl
y s
uppo
r
t
e
d b
y
th
e
b
a
nk
,
bu
t
m
ay o
n o
cca
sion
s
function
as a
ret
a
inin
g s
tru
c
tur
e
.lts
us
e
e
n
a
bl
es
th
e s
lop
e
o
f
th
e
b
a
nk to b
e
incr
ease
d. Th
e a
d
va
nt
age
i
s
p
ar
ti
c
ul
ar
l
y
m
a
r
ke
d in th
e case o
f
ca
n
a
l
s
in wh
ic
h th
e water
l
e
-Table
1
-
Limiting veloeities at bed level for various soils [1
, 2, 3
]
.
ve
l v
a
r
ies, excava
t
e
d in soil
s
with
a
pr
eva
iling
c
l
ay co
nt
e
nt.
C
h
a
n
ges
in th
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
ont
e
nt
o
fth
e so
il
s a
lt
e
rn
a
tin
g
b
e
tw
ee
n
v
e
r
y
dr
y a
nd s
a
tur
a
tion
,
l
ea
d to fi
s
surin
g
ofth
e s
lop
es a
nd th
e-r
e
b
y
d
ec
r
ease
d
s
t
a
bilit
y a
nd imp
e
rm
ea
bilit
y.
T
o co
unt
e
r
t
hi
s
te
nd
e
n
cy,
th
e s
id
e s
l
o
p
es
mu
s
t b
e ve
r
y ge
ntI
e.
Th
e a
ddition
ofa
r
eve
tm
e
nt
e
n
a
bl
es
th
e
di
sa
d
va
nt
ages
to b
e
ov
e
r
c
om
e
,
a
nd
a
ll
o
w
s
th
e
slop
e
to b
e
in
c
r
ease
d.
H
e
r
e a
gain
,
th
e
c
o
s
t of th
e
r
e
v
e
tm
e
nt
must b
e
b
a
lan
ce
d
aga
inst th
e
re
s
ultin
g
b
e
n
e
fit
s s
u
c
h
as
r
e
du
ce
d
excava
tion
a
nd th
e s
m
a
ll
e
r t
o
p width
r
e
quir
e
d b
y
th
e ca
n
a
l owin
g
to th
e stee
p
e
r
s
id
e s
l
o
p
es
.
c)
Proteetion of the canal bed and banks
from
erosion.
Ar
eve
tm
e
nt
h
as
th
e
fun
c
ti
o
n
o
f pr
ov
idin
g
th
e
n
a
tur
a
l
s
oil
w
i
th m
ec
h
a
ni
ca
l
prot
e
etion
aga
in
st
e
r
os
i
o
n.
Th
e
pr
i
n
c
ip
a
l
c
a
u
ses ofe
ro
s
ion
a
r
e
:
a
tmo
s
ph
e
r
ic
age
nt
s: ra
in
,
w
ind
a
nd fro
s
t
;
w
a
v
es, a
nd th
e
h
y
dr
o
-d
y
n
a
mi
cs
o
f th
e c
ur
re
nt,
p
a
rti
c
ul
a
rl
y i
n
fas
t-fl
ow
in
g
c
h
a
nn
e
l
s
a
nd in
a
r
eas o
f
a
bn
o
rm
a
l
tu
r
bulen
ce
ca
u
se
d b
y
obst
a
cl
es
or th
e
un
e
v
e
nn
ess
o
n th
e
b
e
d
o
r b
a
nk
s.
In
a
rtifi
c
i
a
l ch
a
nn
e
l
s
th
e c
r
oss sec
ti
o
n i
s ca
l
c
ul
a
t
e
d
s
o th
a
t
th
e ve
lo
c
it
y
ofth
e
flow on th
e
inv
e
rt
, (
u
s
u
a
ll
y 7
0-
8
0
%
o
fm
ea
n
ve
lo
c
it
y)
do
es
not
e
x
ce
ed th
e
limit
i
n
g va
lu
e c
h
a
r
ac
t
e
ri
s
ti
c
o
f
th
e
b
e
d m
a
t
e
ri
a
l
a
t whi
c
h ero
s
ion would
occ
ur. Th
e
limitin
g
v
e
-loeiti
es
for th
e
mor
e
common t
y
p
es
of b
e
d m
a
t
e
ri
a
l
a
r
e
list
e
d in
T
a
bl
e
l. Pl
a
cing
a
r
eve
tm
e
nt on th
e
b
e
d
a
nd b
a
nk
s a
llows th
e
a
dopti
o
n of
g
r
ea
t
e
r v
e
loeiti
es a
nd r
e
du
c
tion
o
f th
e
cro
ss sec
-tion
.
N
ea
rl
y a
ll c
a
n
a
l
s a
r
e
prot
ec
t
e
d
on
s
h
a
rp
c
urv
es a
nd
a
lso on
wid
e
r
eac
h
es
whi
c
h
a
r
e s
ubj
ec
t t
o wave ac
ti
o
n
.
Pr
otec
ti
ve
r
eve
t-m
e
nt
s a
r
e a
l
s
o u
se
d
e
xt
e
n
s
iv
e
l
y
to pr
o
t
eet
th
e
b
a
nk
s a
nd b
e
d
s
of n
a
tur
a
l
w
a
t
e
r
c
our
ses s
ubj
ec
t to
e
r
os
i
o
n.
a
nd
occas
ion
a
ll
y
whol
e
f
as
t flowin
g
str
e
tch
e
s
a
r
e
c
a
n
a
li
ze
d to off
e
r
a
con
ve
ni
e
nt
a
ltern
a
tiv
e
to th
e
u
se
of d
r
op
s
tru
ct
ur
es
o
r
s
ill
s.
V
e
lo
c
it
y
in m
e
tr
es
p
e
r
sec
ond
B
e
d M
a
t
e
ri
a
l
No m
a
t
e
ri
a
l
Colloidal m
a
t
e
ri
a
l
ca
r
r
i
e
d in
s
u
s
p
e
nsion
ca
rri
e
d in
s
u
s
p
ens
ion
Fin
e sa
nd
. (
N on
-co
ll
o
id
a
l
) .
0.4
5
0
.7
5
S
a
nd
y
cl
ay
.
(
N
o
n-
co
lloid
a
l
)
0
.55
0
.7
5
Soft
c
l
ays
0.
60
0
.
90
Mud
s.
0
.75
l.05
Co
a
r
se sa
nd
0
.75
l.50
M
e
dium cl
ay
.
1.15
l.50
Gr
ave
l
1.20
l.85
Shin
g
l
e
1.
5
0
1.70
H
a
rd cl
ay
l.8
5
1.85
12
d)Rough faced Iinings.
With certain materials arevetment can be expected toreduce the roughness to below that of unlined sections. Less rough-ness allows smaller sections to beused and thus brings econo-mies in excavation and in the superficial area ofthe ground oe-cupied.
In other cases, the objective isto achieve the opposite effect-i.e.to produce surfaces ofconsiderable roughness. An example isacanal which is to be constructed in steeply sloping ground. As an alternative to inserting drop structures or sills to dissip -ate the energy combined with lower gradients to reduce the ve-locity, the canal is excavated with its bed sloping parallel to the
.ground. The energy isdissipated byfriction around the wetted perimeter formed by a revetment of sufficient roughness and which is robust enough to withstand the incidental velocities.
A lined canal will also tend to maintain its designed capacity throughout its lifetime without reduction of flow capacity, whereas the growth of vegetation in an unlined canal will re-duce its capacity at a rate which increases with time.
The presence of arevetment discourages the growth of grass and anyvariations in roughness are usually due toageing ofthe revetment and not to growth of vegetation.
e)Reduction in maintenance costs.
A common maintenance operation, weed clearance, has to be carried out from time to time to prevent loss of capacity. A revetment, since it reduces or inhibits growth, permits this ope -ration to becarried out less frequently, or not at all. Moreover, mechanical weed clearance is usually simpier on revetted than on unrevetted canals.
The adoption of a lining and its selection from the many types available, is dictated by technical andeconomie considerations and by practical experience.
The problems met during design are numerous and ofa va-ried nature - problems of seepage, slope stability, erosion, maintenance and of operation, among others.
Their cornplexity, the inter-action of the various factors and the impossibility ofevaluating them econornically, make plan -ning a painstaking exercise. In seeking the optimum solution, the designer's ability and experience can be usefully supple-mented by analysis of similar existing projects.
For this reason, in the pages that follow, the most widely used types of lining are discussed, and examples of existing works illustrated.
1.4
T
y
p
es of
r
evet
m
e
n
ts
The si rnplest type of revetment is turfwhich is formed eitherby sodding, or soiling and seeding. Because of its great disad-vantage of impeding the flowas it grows, it isusually only used for tlood banks or side slope proteetion above normal water le-vel. Puddled clay is still an effective method of lining and sea-ling channels flowing through permeable soils and brushwood orshingle, held in position bywire netting anchored to the bed and side slopes, are equally effective in preventing the fissuring of cohesive soils in dry conditions.
Random tipped stone iscommonly used on rivers and occa -sionally on canals. Although simpier to place, particularly un-der water by tipping, than any other systern, it is not easy to control the thickness, and wastage occurs in attempting to ob -tain the minimum requirement. As it is not bonded in any way, additional allowance has to bemade for losses caused byerosion.
Pitched stone, which is economical in material, was apopular method until the 1960's but has since become very expensive in labour. Masonry and brickwork which are also expensive be -cause of their skilled labour content are now generally only used in short lengths of proteetion adjacent to bridges and
other structures.
They, unlike tipped and pitched stone, are rigid in character and likely to rupture ifaffected by settlement.
Concrete is used inagreat many forms: in situ, mass or rein -forced; pre-cast in slabs or in interlocking blocks; in mattress form by injecting it into man-made fibre quiltings. Concrete provides a smooth surface when placed in situ or as pre-cast slabs and gives a very economical channel cross section. How-ever, this form of construction is impermeable and inflexible and should be used with caution in ground conditions which give rise to settlement or uplift. Pre-cast blocks which may be keyed so that they interlock, or joined with steel pins or ties, provide amore flexible and semi permeable lining but a roug-her surface. The injected mattress type will conform to any pro-filewhen initially placed, but is rigid thereafter. Some of these latter are semi permeable, all are usually rough faced.
Asphalt, asphaltic concrete, sand asphalt mastic grouted stone, and sand asphalt mastic are all impervious but flexible, and linings of them may be rough or smooth faced [5], [6]. Membrane linings of butyl rubber, poly-vinyl or polythene are 13
completely impermeable and flexible but onlyhave alimited life due to their lack of resistance to puncturing and to weathering.
From the variety ofmaterials mentioned above, the designer must choose one which has the qualities ofirnperrneability, ro-bustness, flexibility, roughness, durability andeconomy tosuit his requirements. With regard to the choice offlexible or rigid linings, the former have a decided advantage in that they can conform to ground movement due to settlement or heave in the invert or side slopes with no change in their effectiveness [4]. The stone filled wire mesh Reno mattress and gabion have these characteristics, and although rough faced and permeable
14
in their normal form, they can be made impervious by laying waterproof sheeting under them or impervious and smooth faced by grouting with sand asphalt mastic.
Their other advantages are that they are structurally mono-lithic, their construction does not require skilled labour and they can be placed under water in pre-fabricated sections with comparative ease.
The following chapters contain descriptions of the Reno mattress and gabions, design data for their use as channel li-nings, and a study ofthe methods employed in their construc -tion.
CHAPTER
11
Characteristics
of flexible linings
of Reno mattress
and gabions
2
.
1
P
ermeable, ungrouted
l
ini
n
gs
The stee! wire mesh box gabions and their applications areweil known. They have been adequately described in other publications [7]; and further treatment here is superfluous. Box gabions are used for heavy retaining structures in slip contro! in mountainous areas [8] and in road construction generally [9]. They are also used for revetments of considerable thickness on rivers and canals [10].
The Reno mattress, on the other hand is specifically intended to provide a comparatively thin but highly flexible channel lin-ing which is described in detail be!ow.
a) The Reno mattress
The Reno mattress can be described as a gabion ofwhich the depth is small in proportion to its length and width. It is divided into several cells by transverse diaphragms and is fabricated from woven hexagonal steel wire netting (Figs. 1,2). The base, sides and ends are formed from one single panel of netting on which the diaphragms are fixed at 1 m centres. The lid is supplied as a separate panel of mesh. A typical assembied unit would be 6 m long by 2 m wide (Fig. 1),and divided into 6 cells. The external
edges of all the mesh panels are selvedged with wirewhose dia
-meter is about 30%greater than that used in the mesh fabric.
This selvedge wire adds structural strength to the cage and faci
-litates installation during which the units are wired together
and the lids laced down tothe sides and diaphragms (Figs. 3,4).
The steel wire used in the manufacture of the mesh is zin
c-Table 2 -
Standard
dimensions of Reno mattress and gabions.coated to an internationally recognised standard. When the
mattress is tobe installed inconditions which are agressive t
o-wards the zinc coating the wire is additionally protected by
PVc. Technical data on the standard Reno mattress units is gi -ven in Table 2.
Zinc-coated Reno mattress Zinc-coated Reno mattress with PVC sleeve
Mesh Type Wire Dmmiameter Thickness Mesh Type Wire Thickness
m elCore mrn elExternaJ rnrn m 2.00 0.17 2.00 3.00 0.17 6 x 8 0.23 6x8 0.23 2.20 0.30 2.20 3.20 0.30 0.15 5 x 7 2.00 0.20 0.25 Width: 2.00- 3.00 m-Length: 3.00-4.00- 5.00 -6.00 m
Zinc-coated gabions Zinc-coated gabions with PVC sleeve
Mesh Type Wire Dmiameterrn Thicknessm Mesh Type Wire Thickness
elCore mm elExternaJ mm m 10 x 12 2.70 10 x 12 2.40 3.40 3.00 2.70 3.70 0.50 2.70 0.50 8 x 10 2.40 3.40 1.00 8 x 10 3.00 2.70 3.70 6x8 2.20 2.70 1.00 5x7 2.00 2.40 Width: 1.00- 2.00 m-Length: 2.00 -3.00 - 4.00 m far 1.00 mwide gabions; 3.00-4.00 -5.00 m for 2.00 mwide gabions
Reno rnauress and gabions aremanufactured with double-twisted hexagonal mesh made with annealed mild steel wire, zinccoaiedaccording to Circ, Cons. Sup. LL. PP. No. 2078 dd. 27.8.1962. 10BS443-1982 and tou.s.Federal Specificatien QQ-W-461 H finish S-class 3.
PVC-coated mauress are made withwire coated by extrusion with a special, highly corrosion resistant PVC. The types indicated in the table are srandards: for more detailed information, see general caralogue [7J.
b) Assembly.
The individual units are supplied folded flat to facilitate both their erection and transportation.
Before placing in position the mattress is easily assembled by
lacing the vertical edges ofthe end and diaphragm panels tothe
longitudinal sides which, asmentioned above, are integral with the base. The line on which the sides hinge upwards isclearly
indicated by a wire of larger diameter woven into the mesh
(Fig. 1).
c) Placing in position.
The units should be assembied onflat ground a short distance from their final position, firstlyfor convenience ofworking and se-condly toavoid impairing the prepared side slope orbase (Fig. 5).
16
A number of assembied units are placed in position and joined by lacing together all tbe adjoining edges. The lacing sbould be carried out by passing the binding wire continuously through each mesh in turn and making a double turn at every second mesh. It is important that this operation is effected wben tbe units are ernpty. It is difficult after they have been filled.
The joining together of the units, 'which is normal gabion construction practice, ensures that a continuous monolithic structure, and therefore one which is the most effective, is ob-tained (Figs. 6, 7).
d) Filling.
The Reno mattress is simple to fill using any mechanical plant which is suitable for the particular site conditions. As the stone size is smal!, a minimum ofmanual works is required (Figs. 8,9,10).
The filling material can be any hard, durable stone which re-sists weathering and should have aspecific gravity of not less than 2000 kg/m' (bulk density 1300 kg/m').
e)Fitting the lids.
Immediately after the mattresses have been filled the lid
pa-nels (Fig. 1) or wire rolls (Fig. 11)are wired down to the tops of
all the sides and the diaphragms
.
It
is recommended that lacing to the two long sides should be
completed first
,
followed by the two ends and the diaphragms.
The sequence of operations in the assembly and fitting of the
Reno mattress can therefore be briefly summarised as follows:
1) assembly of the mattress units;
2) placing in position and lacing together;
3) fil!ing with stone;
4) fitting the lids.
f) Reno mattress placed in situ.
It
has already been said that the advantages offered by the
Reno mattress as a channellining are that it is both flexible and
permeable.
Itis also a relatively thin lining which has no ability
to support
,
or retain, earth bebind it. Hence it is essential, when
it is placed on an earth slope, that the slope is basically stable,
and not steep enough to induce the mattress to slide down it.
Notwithstanding this restrietion it should be added that the
mattress is capable of resisting or conforming to smalllocal
fai-lures occurring underneath it.
The mattress unit should be placed with its diaphragrns lying
perpendicular to the direction in which the stone fil!ing wil!
tend to move, either under the influence of flowing water
,
or
down a slope. The purpose is to restriet as far as possible the
mi-gration ofthe stones inside the wire netting and thus to prevent
the formation ofvoids through which fine material could leach
from under the mattress. On steep slopes therefore, units
should be positioned with the diaphragms running
horizontal-ly, and on the beds offast flowing channels with them at right
angles to the current.
Itis not always expedient to follow this
rule meticulously during construction and a compromise may
have to be made
,
for example in a very small channel or in one
with steep sides and an invert less than 1 m wide all the units
would be laid with diaphragms parallel to the flow. Conversely
if the cross section has gentle side slopes
,
and the water
velo-city is high, the diaphragms would all be perpendicular to the
flow (See Figs
.
12
,
13).
One of the most vulnerable parts of a channel lining is the
upstream edge.
Itshould not cause undue turbulence and it
must be sufficiently weil anchored to resist uplift and
move-ment.
One method of anchoring
,
is to lay the upstream end of the
mattress in a trench excavated in the bed and side slopes. The
downstream side ofthe trench is sloped so that the mattress lies
on a smooth vertical radius and emerges with its top flush with
the surface of the channel. The trench is backfil!ed and
com-pacted after the mattress has been laid and filled
.
Another
me-thod is to form a cut-off wall with a lx l m course of gabions
sunk in below the surfaceacrossthe sectionwith the Reno mattress
2.00-3.00m
I·
·1
18
wired down secure1y to it (Figs, 14, 15).
The growth ofvegetation has a beneficial effect in cana1s lined with Reno mattress in that the roots will bind the stone filling and further re duce any tendency in soilleaching (Figs. 16,17,
18, 19).At some stage however, it must be cleared to prevent too great a reduction in capacity, using a herbicide, (one which will
not corrode the wire netting) or mechanica1 equipment.
The soil condition
s
along the cours
e
of a canal will
v
ar
y
and
there will
a
lways be small loc
a
lised pockets of unstable
mate-rial such as soft clays
,
running sand
,
fine silts etc. The Reno
mattress alone may not be adequate as a revetment at these points
and ma
y
have to be replaced or reinforeed with 0.5 or 1.0m
t
hick
gabions on the lower part ofthe side slope and at the toe to
pro-vide sufficient support.
In the case of superficial landslides
,
it may be sufficient to
use
,
just in the areas of the bank involved
,
a 1arger heavier
ga-Fig. 14 -Stepped cut-offwall 1.00 - 2.00 m wide formed with gabions shaped on site.
Fig. 15 - Continuous gabion cut-off wall 2.00 mwide.
r---~
15
Fig. 16-17 -Reno mattress lining on the Tagliamento River, (Latisana) atthe completion of construction (1969) and 15 years after (1984).
16
Fig. 18-19 - Reno mattress lining on the Brenta River, (Padua), during construction (1971) and 13 years af ter (1984).
18 19
21
1.00m
H
1H
.00 m1:Gabion revetment,0.50 m thick
22,---, 23
26
bion revetment of 0.50 or 1.00 m thick
(
Figs
.
20
,
21
,
22
,
23)
.
In mountainous areas, canals constructed as part of
hydro-electric power schemes
,
or training works
,
will probabl
y
be very
fast flowing because of the steep gradients and may transport
heav
y
stones and boulders. Any lining must necessarily be of
a robust nature and the Reno mattre
s
s
,
if used
,
should b
e
reinfore
e
d and combin
e
d with g
a
bions or other suitabl
e
m
a
t
e
-rials
.
If more serious problems ha
v
e to be fac
e
d in the tr
a
ining
and proteetion works of natural wat
e
r courses with rapid current
s
c
a
rrying a l
a
rge amount of solid material
,
he
a
vi
e
r lon
g
itudin
a
l
protections and groynes are used
.
In comparison with rigid or semi-rigid structures or loos
e
stone linings
,
R
e
no m
a
ttress rev
e
tm
e
nts h
a
v
e
th
e
ad
va
nt
ag
e o
f
flexibilit
y
in situ
a
tion
s
wh
e
r
e
s
e
ttling
a
nd ero
s
ion
o
f th
e
b
a
s
e
material are expected
(
Figs
.
24
,
25
,
26
,
27
,
28
).
g) Placing under water.
The more traditional methods of carrying out protective
works under water are: sheet piling, random tipping of stone
'and by
sinking fascine mattresses. The first can o
n
ly be
u
sed for
bank protection
,
the second is difficult to control and is
waste-f
u
l in materia
l
and t
h
e thir
d
requires a
p
lentif
ul
s
u
pp
l
y ofwattle
a
nd
of
l
a
b
o
u
r to c
u
t it a
n
d to fa
br
icate it into a mattress.
Using simp
l
e pontoons, or pontoon rafts fttted with tilting
platforms or lifting gear
,
pre-fi
ll
e
d R
eno mattress units ofup to
10 m x 10 m in size can
b
e place
d
accurately
u
nder wa
t
er on to
the
b
eds and side slopes of canals or rivers (Fig
.
29) [14,15, 16,
17]
.
As the
u
nits are assem
b
Ied and then fiUe
d
mechanica
ll
y on
a level surface on the pontoons, the pre-fabricat
i
on is fast and
simple
.
The operation of positioning the units requires no
more specialised equipment no
r
skill than that nee
d
ed for
nor-mal underwater work. The method has proved to be effective
and economical, and has been a
d
opted for a variety of
u
n
d
er-water proteetion schemes.
D
etai
l
s of typical
operations and of
the equipment can be fo
un
d in Chapter
I
V section 4.3 where
examples of comp
l
eted works are treated.
h
)
Acc
e
ptabl
e
h
y
draulic condition
s
for R
e
no mattre
ss
and gabion
r
ev
etment
s
.
Th
e
stability of
R
eno mattress linings depends on the thick
-ness of the structure
,
the s
i
ze of the stone fill and the robust
-ness of the wire netting.
Assuming the
"
average velocity
"
of the flow as being
repre-sentative ofthe stresses acting on the
l
ining, the c
h
oice ofthose
three design parameters is easi
l
y obtained from the figures va
-lid for Froude number
:s
1.5 in Tab
l
e No. 3 and from the
graphs in Fig. 61 in Chapter lIl.
In Table No
.
3
, "
critical velocity
"
can be defined as the
maxi-mum velocity at which no movement ofthe filling material will
occur. The term ''Limit Velocity" is used to
d
enote the velocity
at which modest deformation of the mattress has occurred due
to movement ofthe fill material and which does not materially
affect the discharge capacity.
An analytical procedure for the design of Reno mattress
li-nings is described in Chapter IIl.
The guide and values given in Ta
b
le No
.
3 for design pur
-poses are compile
d
f
r
om the resu
l
ts of tests conducted in 1982
-83
b
y the Hydra
ul
ics La
b
oratory of the Engineering
R
esearch
Centre of Colora
d
o State University
i
n Fort Collins, U.S.A
.
This researc
h
has also quantified the advantages that derive
fro
m
containment ofthe fi
ll
material by mesh when compared
with
l
oose rip rap protection.
It
has been shown that Reno mattress linings have double the
stability of rip rap of the stone grading against bed tractions.
Furthermore, it was verified that, for a given
velocity of flow
,
the Reno mattress needs only be 1/3 to 1/4 as thick as a rip rap
lining.
Table 3 - Indicative thicknesses of Reno mattress and gabion revetments [11].
Rock Fill Critical Limit
Type Thickness velocity velocity
m Size dso
mis
mis
mm
m
7
0 - 100
0.085
3
.5
4
.
2
0.1
5
- 0
.
17
7
0 - 150
0
.
110
4
.
2
4.5
7
0 - 100
0
.
085
3
.6
5
.
5
R
e
no m
a
tt
ress
0.23 - 0.2
5
7
0 - 150
0.120
4.5
6.1
7
0 - 120
0
.
100
4
.
2
5
.
5
0.30
100 - 150
0
.
125
5
.
0
6.4
100 - 200
0
.
150
5
.
8
7.
6
G
a
bion
s
0
.
50
120
-
250
0
.
190
6.4
8.0
Where th
e r
e
v
etment
has
to b
e
pl
a
c
e
d unde
r
w
a
t
e
r the
thick-n
es
s of th
e
R
e
no m
a
ttr
ess
remain
s
the
s
am
e
since it
ca
n be
launch
e
d from
a
pontoo
n whe
r
e
as rip
r
ap h
a
s to b
e
incre
a
sed b
y
50
%
[12
,
13
,
4
9,
50
,
51]
.
The b
ig
reduction in the revetment thickn
ess,
which is
achieved usin
g
Reno mattress instead of r
i
p
r
ap
,
i
s of economie
significane
e
in prote
e
tion project
s
in l
a
r
g
e ri
ve
rs
,
g
iv
en th
e
s
a
me
a
rea
of
w
ork
, a
nd
,
th
e
r
e
fore
,
th
e
qu
a
nt
i
t
y
of mat
e
ri
a
l used
.
2.2
S
emi permea
bl
e and impermea
b
le linings
with sand aspha
l
t mastic
.
a) Gene
r
a
l
characteristics of san
d
asp
ha
lt m
a
stic g
r
oute
d R
e
n
o
mattress.
The combin
a
t
i
on ofthe
s
ton
e
filled R
e
no m
a
ttr
es
s
a
nd s
a
nd
as
phalt masti
c
h
as
th
e c
har
a
ct
er
istics of both gab
i
on work and
a
sph
a
lt concret
e
. Th
e a
ddit
i
on o
f
bituminous m
as
ti
c
to th
e
R
e
no m
a
ttr
ess
produ
ce
s
a s
tru
c
tur
e w
hich
c
ombin
e
s the pro
-perti
es a
nd p
e
rfo
r
man
ce
o
f
both m
a
t
e
ri
a
I
s.
Th
e
m
a
ttr
ess
r
e
-t
a
in
s
it
s
fl
e
xib
i
lit
y,
while th
e
d
e
n
si
ty o
f
th
e
filling i
s
in
crea
sed
a
nd th
e
r
ef
or
e
th
e
efficienc
y
of th
e
prot
e
ction
.
If
a
ll th
e
voids
b
e
twe
e
n th
e s
ton
e
s in the la
ye
r
a
r
e
fill
e
d and th
e
surface of th
e
m
a
ttres
s co
v
e
red
,
th
e
linin
g
will b
e
compl
e
tel
y
imp
e
rviou
s.
The masti
c a
lso p
r
ot
e
ct
s
the w
i
r
e
m
es
h
agai
nst
c
orrosion
a
nd
from
a
bra
s
ion b
y
tr
a
nsported m
a
t
e
rial.
Th
e
wi
re
mesh r
e
info
r
e
e
s the
g
rout
e
d ston
e
l
a
y
e
r
a
nd
g
i
ves
i
t
str
e
ngth in t
e
n
s
ion
.
H
e
nce
,
th
e
thi
c
kn
e
ss of th
e
combin
e
d
s
tructure
c
an b
e
con
s
id
e
r
a
bl
y
less th
a
n th
a
t of ordinar
y
m
as
t
i
c
grout
e
d
s
ton
e
to withstand the
sa
m
e s
tre
sses
. Th
e
r
es
ulting
s
a
ving in bitum
e
n
a
nd ag
g
r
e
gate
,
and th
e
in
c
r
ea
s
e
d tlexibilit
y
du
e
to the
re
duced thicknes
s,
hav
e
gi
v
en ri
s
e to
e
xten
s
i
ve
u
se
of this t
y
pe of linin
g
for proteetion in
a va
ri
e
t
y
of w
a
t
e
rwa
y
s.
b
) Mix
d
esign of s
and
as
ph
alt mastic.
To
av
oid excessive det
a
il
,
onl
y
th
e
fund
a
m
e
nt
a
l d
ata
on mi
x
design i
s g
i
ve
n h
e
r
e.
For full
e
r inform
a
tion
,
r
ef
er
e
n
c
e
s
hould
be made to th
e
specific publi
ca
tion
s
li
s
t
e
d in th
e
bibl
i
ograph
y
[
5,
6]
.
Sand asphalt mastic is cornposed of sand, a filter and bitu-men, the proportions of which will vary according to the parti-cular purpose and conditions for which
th
e
mattressi
s
int
e
n-d
e
d.
Generally,proportion
s
ar
e
within th
e
lirnitss
hown in th
e
T
a
ble b
e
l ow.
C
on
st
i tu
e
nt
s
In the dry
Under water
-
Sand 0 to
3
mm66 to 73
%
by mass
65 to 75
%
by mass
10 to 15
%
by rnass
-
Fill
e
r
12 to 16
%
by
mass15 to 20
%
by ma ss
-
Bitum
e
n
15 to
1
8
%
b
y
rnass
Th
e
sa
nd
s
h
o
uld b
e a
n
g
ul
a
r
,
it mu
s
t b
e
cl
e
an
a
nd fr
ee
of
a
n
y
ex
t
ra
n
eo
u
s
m
ate
riaI
s.
Th
e
fill
e
r
ca
n b
e
h
y
dr
a
t
e
d lim
e,
portland
ce
m
e
nt
o
r
as
ph
a
lti
c
fill
e
r
;
it mus
t
b
e
fin
e e
nou
g
h to p
a
ss
com-p
l
e
t
e
l
y
th
ro
u
g
h
a
n A
.
S.T
.
M
.*
n.80
se
iv
e
a
nd to pass
a
t le
a
st 80
%
of
i
ts
bul
k
througha
n A
.
S.T
.
M
.
n
.
200 seiv
e.
T
h
e s
p
ec
i
fica
ti
o
ns
for th
e
bitum
e
n
a
r
e as
follows:
-
F
or a
p
p
licati
o
n
in th
e
dr
y
B40/50
,
B 60170or B 801100 [as per C.N
.
R
**
-
A.S.T
.
M
.
specificat
i
ons
]
-
Fo
r
a
p
p
li
ca
ti
o
n
und
e
r w
a
t
e
r to
a
d
e
pth
g
r
ea
t
e
r than 2
.
00 m
-
For
ap
pli
ca
t
io
n
under w
a
t
e
r to
a
d
e
pth of 2.00 m
B 80/100 or B
1201200[as per C.N
.
R. - A.S.T
.
M
.
specifications]
B 1801200
[as per C.N.R
.
- A
.
S.T.M
.
spec
i
fications]
T
h
e
mastici
s
mi
xe
d
a
nd pl
ace
d hot. Application
tempera-t
u
res
are
g
i
ve
n b
e
l ow
.
*A.S.T.M. -American Society Ior Testing Matcrials.
** C.N.R. - National Council lorResearch.
- F
or
a
p
p
li
ca
ti
o
n
in th
e
dr
y
with
-
For
a
ppl
ic
ation
und
e
r w
a
t
e
r to
a
depth of 2
.
00 m
,
with
-
For
a
ppli
ca
tion und
e
r w
a
ter to a depth
g
r
e
ater th
a
n 2
.
00 m
,
with
B 40/50 pen bitum
e
n
160 to 180
°
C
B
60170pen bitum
e
n
155 to 175
°
C
B 80/100 pen bitumen
150 to 170
°
C
B 80/100 p
e
n bitum
e
n
140 to 160
°
C
B180/200 pen bitumen
130 to 150
°
C
B
1801200pen bitumen
110 to 140
°
C
c) Reno mattress revetments grouted and sealed with sandasphalt mastic.