• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

2) Show that the invariancy of Hamiltonian with respect to infinitesimal rotations leads to the angular momentum conservation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "2) Show that the invariancy of Hamiltonian with respect to infinitesimal rotations leads to the angular momentum conservation"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Section IV, Quantum Mechanics II

Symmetries and conservations laws in quantum mechanics

1) Show that the invariancy of Hamiltonian H with respect to infinitesimal shifts in space leads to the momentum conservation in the quantum system governed by H, i.e. the mean value hP iψ(t)= const, where ψ(t) is an arbitrary state.

Use the Heisenberg equation dSdt = i

~[H, S].

2) Show that the invariancy of Hamiltonian with respect to infinitesimal rotations leads to the angular momentum conservation.

3) Consider the parity inversion operator P ψ(x) = ψ(−x). Formulate the conservation law being a consequence of invariancy of the Hamiltonian with respect to parity inversion.

4) Consider the Hamiltonian

Hf (x) = −d2f (x)

dx2 , f ∈ L2(0, 2π) ,

acting in L2(0, 2π); where f (0) = f (2π) and f0(0) = f0(2π). Define the momentum operator and formulate the momentum conservation in the con- sidered model.

1

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Find, if exist, central algorithm and optimal linear algorithm for the problems of:..

[r]

In particular, if G has k + 2 vertices and is W k -maximal, then it is maximal with respect to absence of Hamiltonian paths; it has no Hamiltonian path, but each graph obtained from

On the one hand, when the damping coefficient is small enough (this depends on the data of the problem), Problem (P ω ) is well posed: the topological derivative then provides a

The method presented here is the key to the inductive construction of theorems on the higher order regularity of the solution of the problem (1), (2) with respect to the parameter

In Section 3 we extend Noether’s Theorem to a result about minimizing trajectories of a family of Hamiltonians of class C 1 , and explain why this result does not extend to families

By a relational (Kripke) model for LC we mean an ordered triple hW, C, vi which is a Kripke model in the usual sense (i.e., W is a set of possible worlds, C is a (ternary)

More- over, our results and methods used in the proof suggest that in the class of bounded pseudoconvex complete Reinhardt domains the symmetry of the Green function is equivalent