Pełen tekst
ARGUMENTATION AND CRITICAL THINKING Topics for the final test
1. Recognizing arguments; distinguishing between argumentative and non-argumentative speech acts.
2. The structure of argument; extracting premises and a conclusion.
3. Argument Diagramming.
4. Implicit elements in an argument (enthymematic arguments).
5. Conversational implicatures.
Maciej Pichlak PhD
Department of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law maciej.pichlak@uwr.edu.pl
Powiązane dokumenty
Problem of finding optimal spanning trees – Kruskal’s Algorithm (with proof of correctness).. Inequality relating connectivity,edge connectivity and minimum
По сути, рекламное сообщение может быть отнесено к первичным речевым жанрам, так как это одноактное, краткое высказывание (которое может быть по- строено
39 J.. A Theory of Argumentation: The Case of Ethical, Political, and Utopian Thinking Abstract: A relevant problem in political philosophy and political theory is the distinction
The professional experience of the court allows for a conclusion that a theft does not buy such a thing as a car radio, and even for a lower price, for he can steal
• In logic, we have an argument whenever we have reasons suggested as premises for a conclusion. Explanations can contain reasoning in this sense and can, therefore, be classified
It makes students familiar with general principles of rational argumentation and basic forms of arguments both in theoretical and practical discourse!.
It makes students familiar with general principles of rational argumentation and basic forms of arguments both in theoretical and practical discourse!.
Commission, social partners, Council of Ministers, social partners procedure EU implementation of Framework Agreements of the European social partners. Essential EU Law in
