.~i
·
T
U
Delft
CPD No.
Conceptual Process Design
Chemical Process Technology
Confidential
Subject
A Multi-purpose Esterification plant for the production of Acetates from Methyl Proxitol (25 kt/a), Ethyl Proxitol (17 kt/a), Butyl Oxitol (7.5 kt/a) and Butyl Di-oxitol (7.5 kt/a)
Authors
L.
Bode
E.S. Koppendraaier
A.D. Minnigh
J.P.A
.
Monod de Froideville
Keywords
Telephone
015-215 8449
015-215 85 14
015-257 82 70
015-2135351
Esterification, glycol ether esters, multi purpose, entrainer
selection
Assignment issued
Report issued
Assessment
January 14
th,1999
Apri120
th,1999
May 4
th,1999
Faculteit Technische Natuurwetenschappen Scheikundige Technologie en Materiaalkunde
I 4100 I I 4200 I I 4300 I L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J LP ,team
---,
U
CW~01
r-....o I I I~CW
[ .-CWr-.--t
·
w
u: I I P4205 : L ____________ _ P4312 ProcessC~201 Elter Iwater spUtter E4205 : C~201 .. boA er E421~ : Product cooler C4202 Roactanto recovery E4206 : C4201 roboner E4215 : Product cool ...
I
f
EW
~I
.201Equipment Summory
E4323 : Woter cooler P4208 : Pump
E4324 Wat ... cooler P4209 : Pump
T C4203 UCW
~212
r---, I I P4315 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J DesignersP4317 Pump V4304 C4304 reftu. occu L Bode P4318 Pump V4305 Oeconter T C4304 Project I I I I I I I I I B C4305
i
[ 4l2O CW I P4318 I L ____________ _ Process FlowU
CW~323
....
---,
WasteBDGA
SchemeProductlon of But)! 0191)'<:01 Acetot. In a loIuIU-P"'l'ol' [It ... lflcotlon plant
1 4100 11 4200 11 4300 I L ____________________________________ ~ L _______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JL __________________________________ ---~
P4312
C4201 E.I.,. Iwaler oplltler C4202 Reactant. recovery C4203 Producl purlflcaUon C4304 Reactant. recovory C4305 Rloctonts/entrolner recovery E4101 Reactanb cool.r
---ï kjCW
~OI
E4205 : E4206 : E4207 : E4208 : E4209 : E4210 C4201 re bon er C4201 reboner C4202 eonden.er C4202 eonden.er C4203 robollor C420J condens.r I I~CW
[ 4_ CW P4205 ProcessE4214 : Product cooler
E4215 : Producl cool er E4316 : C4304 conden.er E4317 : C4304 reballer E4J18 : Wast. CO~.,
[4319 : C4J05 condenair
~CW
r - - - ----i~~ I I I I I P4208 Equipment SummoryE4323 : Water cooler
E4324 : Water cooler
P4101 Pump P4102 : Pump P4103 : Pump P4204 : Pump P4208 : Pump P4209 : Pump P4210 Pump P4211 Pump P4212 Pump P431J Pump T C4202 P4211 T C4203
î--1
I I I I I P4315 I __________ J I I ~ ______________________________________________ J DesignersP4317 Pump V4304 C4304 reftux accu L Bod,
P4318 Pump V4305 Deconter
P4319 Vocuum pump V4306 C4305 ronu. accu LS. Koppendraalor P4320 : Vocuum pump cw coollnQ waler
P4321 Vocuum pump lp .teom light pr •• au,. ,teom A.D. IoIlnnlQh
R4101 : Reactor mp ,team medium pr ... ur. .teom J.P.A. loIonod do 'roldovili.
B C4305 B C4304
~CW
[ 4J2I) CWr-
-
---I I I I I I kjCW~323
-., 1'---, ~~~~~~~_, I I I I I [4.122 : I I P4318: L ____________ "Process Flow Scheme
BGA
Projecl Producllon of Bul)4 Glycol Acelalo In a loIultl-purpo .. E.lorlRcaUon plonl Pro jecl 10 number CP03229
Compl.Uon Dal. April 20th. 1999
I I I I
I 4100 I I 4200 I I 4300 I
L ____________________________________ J l _______________________________________________________________________ JL _________________________________________________________________________ J
P4312
C4201 E.ler /woler spIlIter C4202 Reactant. recovery
WLP
,Ieom\:;{,02
CW---,
H205 : C4201 rebon ... E4206 : C4201 rebon.,. I I I I I : P4205: L ____________ j Process H214 Product cooler H215 Product cooler~CW
[ 4200 P4208 ---' Equipment SummaryHJ2J : Wot.,. cooler P4208 : Pump E4J24 : Waler cooler P4209 : Pump
T C4202 r---, I I I I I I P4J17 Pump P4JI8 Pump B C4305 B C4304 kjCW Y.212
r---,
W
CW Y.318 I P4315 I P4318 __________ J ~--I ~---,~~-I--\---'{---'~
·
~~ ~:
l __
-{~~---'-Hc.:....:....eaV.;"":,,.,:..ies_____..;:
~.
_______________________________
,.;E
__
P_A
... _ ..
-~
Designers Process Flow Scheme
V4J04 CU04 renu. accu L Bode Projecl ProductIon of Eth)l Proxllol Acelole Ino V4J05 Oeconter t.lultl-purpoll E.lorlflcollon plonl
I 4100 I I 4200 I I 4300 I
L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ L _______________________________________________________________________ JL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J
---
-
--,
C4201 E.ler /waler opUlter E4205 : C4201 rebaner C4202 Reactant. recovery E4206 : C4201 reboRer C4203 Product purlf1cotlon E4207 : C4202 condensor
C4J04 Reactant. recovery E4208 : C4202 conden.er CU05 Raoctonta/enlrolnar recovery E4209 : C4203 reboller E4101 Rlactonta cooler E4210 C420J conden •• r
~CW
[ 420+
CW
P4205
Process
E4214 Product cooler E4215 Product cooler E4316 C4J04 condenser
E4317 C4304 reboner E4318 Wast. cooler
[4319 C4J05 condensor
P4208 _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ .J
Equipment Summary
E4323 : Waler cooler P4208 : Pump E4324 : Water cooler P4209 : Pump
P4101 Pump P4210 Pump P4102 : Pump P4211 Pump P4103 : Pump P4212 Pump P4204 : Pump P4J13 Pump B C4304 T C4202 Waste water
r---
-
---..,
kjCW Y.212U
CW Q 3 1 8 I P4211 __________ J P4315 I P43181
~
·
2 2L_I_~[_~=_~[
.
_________________________________________
_ _
-(~~---M-P--A---:.~
8 _ _
__...
HeaviesDesigners Process Flow Scheme
P4317 Pump V4304 C4304 renux accu L Bode Project ProductIon 0' lAoth)l ProxltDl Acetale In a
P4318 Pump V4305 Oecanter lAulti-purpo •• E.t",lflcollon plant
P4J19 Vocuum pump V4306 C4305 renux accu E.S. Koppendrooier
Pro jee I 10 numb ... CPD3229 P4J20 : Vocuum pump cw coollng wol.,
P4J21 Vocuum pump lp .teom light preuur • • teom A.D. Mlnnlgh
CPD 3229, Confidential Summary
Summary
It is possible to produce 25 kt/a of methyl proxitol.acetate (MPA), 17 kt/a ethyl proxitol acetate (EPA), 7.5 kt/a butyl glycol acetate (BOA) and 7.5 kt/a butyl diglycol acetate (BDOA) out of respectively methyl proxitol (MP), ethyl proxitol (EP), butyl glycol (BO), butyl diglycol (BDO) and acetic acid (AA) in a multi purpose plant. These glycol ether esters are used as additives in water based paints and have a high water solvent power and relatively low volatility. The low volatility can be a great advantage in case of new legislation with respect to volatility of paint additives.
In
the following table the market prices of reactants and products are shown.DEM/t DEM/t DEM/t DEM/t
MP 1400 EP 1700 BG 1300 BDG 1300
AA 1000 AA 1000 AA 1000 AA 1000
MPA 2100 EPA 2700 BGA 2000 BDGA 2000
Margin 691 1078 666 674
The economie margin on EP A is the biggest and therefore it is the most interesting process. MP A has the largest market share but operates with a loss when produced in
a single purpose plant. In a multi purpose plant this conceptual process design will become economically interesting when the precentage of chlorinated organic
components in the MP A wastewater stream is reduced. When the raw material prices decrease with 12.6% the multi purpose plant becomes profitable (NPV=O).
The process is designed to operate 305 days a year, consisting of 166 days for MP A production, 71 days for EPA production, 39 days for BOA production and 29 days for BDGA production. The remaining 60 days are used for c1eaning between runs and catalyst regeneration.
The advantage of a multi purpose plant is the high flexibility to adapt to changing market situations. Future legislation could lead to a higher demand for BOA and BDGA.
To improve the design of this multi purpose plant for glycol ether esters the following research is suggested. In the first place thorough laboratory test should be conducted to obtain accurate kinetic data and thermodynamic properties. Secondly, extensive research should be done to find an entrainer with lower SHE impact and equal or better entrainer properties than 1,2-dichloro ethane.
CPD 3229, Confidential Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the following persons for their assistance and support:
Drs.
A.Beers, Prof
.
dr. ir. H. van Bekkum, Corry
&Mary, Dr. ir. H.J. van der Kooi,
Liang Wu,
Ir. e.P. Luteijn,
Ir.
R.M. MooIdijk,
Ir.
B. Ramakers,
"
Jullie hoeven je collegekaart niet meer te laten
zien,
ik ken jullie nu wel"
Nachtportier
"
Ik dacht al tijdens de reviewmeeting, dit had best een afstudeerproject kunnen
zijn"
CPL
"Havefun"
RM
"Anders doe je
gewoon
de reflux ratio
omhoog"
RM
"Voor
mij hoef je de recycle niet te sluiten"
RM
"m%
is toch mol procent?!"
CPD3229
"Sorry,
Aspen Plus license
validation/chechkoutfailure.
Aspen will shutdown and
reinitialize again
!oKB"
CPD 3229, Canfidential Table af cantents
Table of contents
SUMMARY ...•... 1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... II TABLE OF CONTENTS ... Ill APPENDICES ... V 1 INTRODUCTION ... 1
1.1 REACTION PRODUCTS ... 1
1.2 MAR KET SITUATION ... 1
1.3 PROCESS ... 1
IA AVAILABILITY OFPHYSICALDATA ... 2
2 PROCESS OPTIONS & SELECTION ... 3
2.1 PROCESS CONCEPT CHOSEN ... 3
2.1.1 Tubular reactor and separate distillation section ... 3
2.1.2 Reactive distillation [1,2,3J .............................................. 3
2.1.3 Distillation with external reactors [4J ... 3
2.1.4 Reaction with membrane separation ........................................... 3
2.1.5 Distillation column with reactor in reboiler section [5,6J ... 4
2.2 THE ENTRAINER ... 4
3 BASIS OF DESIGN ... 5
3.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DESIGN ... 5
3.2 PROCESS DEFINITION ... 5
3.2.1 Components and reactions ...... 5
3.2.2 Processes ............................. 7
3.3 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS ... 8
3.3.1 Plant location and capacity .......... ...... 8
3.3.2 Battery limit ...................................... ...... 9
304 DETERMINATION OF THE MARGIN AND MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT ... 13
3.4.1 Calculation of the margin .... ..... 13
3.4.2 Calculation ofthe maximum allowable investment ............ ........ 14
3.4.3 Conclusion ................................. 14
4 THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES AND REACTION KINETICS ... 16
4.1 THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES ... 16
4.1.1 Operating window .................................................................. 16
4.1.2 Component properties ... 16
4.1.3 Thermodynamic modeis ...................... 16
4.1.4 Azeotropes ....................... 17
4.1.5 Data accuracy and validation ... 17
4.2 REACTION KINETICS ... 18
5 PROCESS STRUCTURE AND SELECTION ... 20
5.1 DESIGN CRITERIA AND UNIT SELECTION ... 20
5.1.1 Design ofthe methyl proxitol acetate process ....... 20
5.1.2 Design ofthe ethyl proxitol acetate process ... ... 21
5.1.3 Design ofthe butyl glycol acetate process ..... 21
5.1.4 The design of the butyl diglycol acetate process ... 22
5.2 PROCESS FLOW SCHEME ... 22
CPD 3229, Confidential Table of contents
5.3 PROCESS STREAM SUMMARY ... 24
5.4 UTILITIES ... 24
5.5 PROCESS YIELDS ... 25
6 PROCESS CONTROL ... 27
6.1 REACTION SECTION (41 00) ... 27
6.2 SEPARATION SECTION (4200 AND 4300) ... 27
7 MASS AND HEAT BALANCES ... 28
7.1 MASS AND HEAT BALANCES FOR STREAM COMPONENTS ... 28
7.2 MASS AND HEAT BALANCES FOR TOTAL STREAMS ... 28
8 PROCESS AND EQUIPMENT DESIGN ... 30
8.1 PROCESS SIMULA TION ... 30
8.2 EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND DESIGN ... 30
8.2.1 Design of reactor ....................... ...... 30
8.2.2 Design of the distillation columns ... 30
8.2.3 Design ofthe pumps .... 31
8.2.4 Design ofthe heat exchangers, reboilers and condensers ... 32
8.2.5 Design ofthe decanter ................................... ...... 34
8.2.6 Design ofthe reflux accumulators ... 35
9 WASTES ... 36
9.1 LIQUID WASTES ... 36
9.1.1 Liquid wastes ofthe MPA process ................... 36
9.1.2 Liquid wastes ofthe EPA, BGA and BDGA process ...... 36
9.2 SOLID WASTES ... 37
10 PROCESS SAFETY ... 38
10.1 THE HAZOP ANAL YSIS ... 38
10.2 THE Dow FIRE AND EXPLOSION INDEX ... 38
11 ECONOMIe ANALYSIS ... 40
11.1 DETERMINATION OF THE INVESTMENT COSTS ... 40
11.1.1 Equipment Costs ........................................................... 40
11.1.2 Direct Costs ............................................ 40
11.1.3 Indirect Costs and total CAPEX .......................... 41
11.2 DETERMINATION OF THE PRODUCTION COSTS ... 41
11.2.1 Raw materials ...... 41
11.2.2 VariabIe production costs ... 42
11.2.3 Fixed costs ................................ 42
11.3 DETERMINATION OF THE GROSS INCOME AND CASH FLOW ... 43
11.3.1 Profit and cashflow ... 43
11.3.2 1nfluence of material costs and wastes ... 44
11.4 EcoNOMIe ANAL YSIS ... 45
11.4.1 Profitability ... 45
12 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ... 47
12.1 CONCLUSIONS ... 47
12.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ... 47
12.2.1 Kinetic and physical data ........................... 47
12.2.2 Process .... 47
12.2.3 Recommendations for equipment design ... 47
13 LITERATURE ... 49
14 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ... 50
CPD 3229, Confidential Appendices
Appendices
1.
Process flow schemes
1.1
Process flow scheme MP A
1
.
2
Process flow scheme EPA
1.3
Process flow scheme BGA
1.4
Process flow scheme BDGA
2.
Blockschemes
2.1
Block scheme MP A
2.2
Block scheme EP A
2.3
Block scheme BGA
2.4
Block scheme BDGA
3.
Basis of design
3.1
Pure component properties
3.2
Reaction schemes
4
.
Stream summaries
4.1
Stream summary MP A
4.2
Stream summary EPA
4
.
3
Stream summary BGA
4.4
Stream summary BDGA
5.
Utility summaries
5
.
1
Utility summary MPA
5.2
Utility summary EPA
5
.
3
Utility summary BGA
5.4
Utility summary BDGA
6
.
Mass balances
6.1
Mass balances MP A
6.2
Mass balances EP A
6.3
Mass balances BGA
6.4
Mass balances BDGA
7
.
Equipment calculations
7
.
1
Calculations of the distillation column dimensions
7.2
Calculations of the decanter dimensions
8
.
Equipment
8.1
Equipment summaries sheets
8.2
Equipment specification sheets
9.
Liquid waste streams for the MPA
,
EPA, BGA and BDGA process
10
.
Process safety
10.1
The HAZOP study
10
.
2
Dow Fire and Explosion index ca1culation
11.
Economic analysis
CPD 3229, Confidential 1 Introduction
1 Introduction
The main objective of this conceptual process design is to evaluate whether it is
possible to produce methyl proxitol acetate (25 kt/a), ethyl proxitol acetate (17 kt/a),
butyl glycol acetate (7.5 kt/a) and butyl diglycol acetate (7.5 kt/a) from acetic acid
with respectively methyl proxitol, ethyl proxitol, butyl glycol and butyl diglycol
in a
multi purpose esterification plant.
1. 1
Reaction
produets
Glycol ether esters are used as additives in water based paints and are specialty
products. Adding the glycol ether ester to the paint can increase the solubility of water
in paint. The four glycol ether esters mentioned above are characterised by their high
solvent power and relatively low volatility. The low volatility can be a great
advantage in case of new legislation with respect to volatility of paint additives, BGA
and BDGA being the most interesting with respect to the volatility. Por more detailed
component properties, see Appendix 3.1.
1.2 Market situation
The process design is based on the production of methyl proxitol acetate, this being
the product with the highest market share. At this moment the financial margin on the
production of methyl proxitol acetate is very low. Por the process concept chosen in
this process design the MP A process will not be profitable, unless
itis produced in a
multi purpose plant, see Chapter 11 for more details.
The current situation is that a plant in Belgium produces methyl proxitol acetate for
Shell and Arco Chemicals on the European market. The other three glycol ether esters
are produced in very small quantities; their market shares are still small.
Ifin the
future legislation on the volatility of paint additives will be introduced, these market
shares may grow.
1.3 Process
Por esterification processes, many processes are available. Because the main objective
is to design a multi purpose esterification plant, the most flexible process concept is
the best option. This process concept consists of a fixed bed tubular reactor, with
catalyst Duolite ES-276. The reactor is followed by
a
distillation column to separate
the produced water from the glycol ether ester. The unconverted reactants will be
recovered from the top water stream (for the MP A process the azeotropic agent
1,2-dichloro ethane is used to separate the reactants from water) and the bottom product
stream. The bottom product stream will be purified by distillation. Por the MPA
process a decanter is used to separate the water phase from the entrainer phase.
With esterification processes, one mole of water will be formed for each mole product
formed. Therefore the largest waste
stream
is a wastewater stream, which will be
contaminated with organic compounds (reactants, lights and product). Por each
process, acetic acid is used in high concentrations as a reactant. Acetic acid is very
toxic and introduces a serious hazard.
It will also be present in the waste streams. Por
the production of methyl proxitol acetate the use of an azeotropic agent, 1,2-dichloro
ethane, is necessary to separate water from the reactants. In the wastewater stream for
this process, the chlorinated organic compound 1,2-dichloro ethane will be present.
CPD 3229, Confidential 1 Introduction
Also an additional waste stream of 1,2-dichloro ethane with light ends will exit the
process. The azeotropic agent is toxic and is highly flammable (see Chapter 10
.
2)
.
1.4 Availability of physical data
The four processes were simulated in Aspen Plus 10.0. All physical data necessary for
the simulations were taken from literature, supplied by the database of Aspen Plus
10
.
0 or estimated by Aspen Plus 10.0. The components ethyl proxitol, ethyl proxitol
acetate and by-product propylene glycol diacetate were not available in the Aspen
database
.
Therefore all physical data for these three components were estimated by
CPD 3229, Confidential 2 Process options & selection
2 Process options
&
selection
2. 1 Process concept chosen
The formation of glycol ether acetates from glycol ethers is an esterification/
equilibrium reaction. These types of reactions are slightly exothermal and have a high
selectivity in the main esterification reaction. A disadvantage is the equilibrium; in
such cases often one product is removed in order to make the inverse reaction
impossible. Another possibility to reach an acceptable overall convers ion is a large
recycle of reactants (with a relatively small amount of product). More detailed process
options are described below.
Ittumed out that the choice for a process design depends
strongly on the multi purpose aspect.
2.1.1
Tubular reactor and separate distillation section
The reaction takes place in a tubular reactor, because of the high selectivity towards
the favourable reaction. The effluent of the reactor is purified in two distillation
sections. The first section contains a column for water removal and, depending on the
product
,
several columns for reactant recycle and product purification
.
The second
section is used for the recovery of reactants from the wastewater stream.
The process for the production of MP A needs an entrainer for the water removal. The
second section starts with a column using an entrainer.
2.1.2
Reactive distillation [1,2,3]
In this process reaction and distillation are combined in one column. This process will
give good results for slow equilibrium reactions. The reaction takes place in the
distillation column. The location of the reaction section in the reactive distillation
column depends on the concentration profiles of the components in the column. These
concentration profiles depend on the substances involved. In a multi purpose plant,
four different types of component systems exist. Therefore reactive distillation is not
an option for a multi purpose plant.
2.1.3
Distillation with external reactors [4]
Reaction and distillation can also be combined without actually integrating both in
one column. Use of a mineral acid can be avoided by applying heterogeneous instead
of homogeneous catalysis, employing a strongly acidic ion exchanger. For practical
purposes, it is favourable to arrange the ion exchange beds in extemal reactors. As for
reactive distillation
,
the location of the reaction section in the distillation column
depends on the concentration profiles of the components in the column
.
2.1.4
Reaction with membrane separation
Another possibility is to use a membrane after the reactor. The water formed during
the reaction is taken out before the stream is sent to the distillation columns. The
membranes needed for this process cannot separate all the water from the reaction
mixture. Also other components of the reaction mixture could interact with the
membrane and make the separation impossible.
CPD 3229, Confidential 2 Process options & selection
2.1.5
Distillation column with reactor in reboiler section [5,6]
Again reaction and distillation are combined. The reboiler section of the distillation
column is used as the reaction section. The distillation column continuously strips
water from the main stream with the use of an inert water azeotropic agent. Water and
the entrainer can be separated physically.
The first process option will be developed further because of the following reasons:
1. Reactive distillation (internal and external) is not an option for a multi purpose
plant because of the delicate choice of the reaction section.
2. A membrane is not capable of removing all the water formed in the reactor and it
is not very selective.
3. Because of the difference in boiling points of reactants and products in the four
processes it is very difficult to operate a distillation column with reaction in the
reboiler section.
4.
Ina process with separate reaction and distillation section it is possible to differ
conditions for each process.
Italso leaves the possibility to vary the sequence of
the columns.
Block schemes of the chosen process concepts can be found in Appendix 2
.
2.2
The entrainer
Af ter the reaction section it is necessary to remove the water in the reaction mixture.
Unfortunately in the MPA process, water forms azeotropes with reactants in the
mixture. Therefore an entrainer is used to separate the water from the other
components. Such an entrainer should be capable of [7]:
•
Removing as much water as possible (the amount of entrainer should be as small
as possible).
•
Af ter the distillation the entrainer/water stream must split up in two phases
.
Both
must contain as little other compound as possible.
•
The azeotropic boiling point and the boiling point of the entrainer should be lower
than the boiling points of the other components, because the top stream should
contain little product and reactants.
•
The entrainer must not react with the product or the reactants.
•
The entrainer must be HSE acceptable if possible.
In literature [8,9,10,11] tetrahydrofuran and diisopropyl ether and butyl acetate are
suggested as entrainer. All comply with the stated demands.
Inthe manufacturing of
MP A with the AKZO trial plant [7] also 1,2-dichloro ethane (DCE) is used as
entrainer. A disadvantage of DCE is its low HSE acceptance.
Af ter a closer examination in Aspen, DCE is the only entrainer with reasonable
results. The butyl acetate/water mixture does not split up in two phases in the decanter
due to a large amount of reactants. The use of cyclohexane leads to the loss of
reactant in the water phase. Isopropyl ether leads to unacceptable entrainer waste.
That leaves DCE as only possible entrainer.
CPD 3229, Confidential 3 Basis of design
3 Basis of design
3. 1
Description of the design
The main objective of this conceptual process design is to evaluate whether it is
possible to produce methyl proxitol acetate, ethyl proxitol acetate, butyl glycol acetate
and butyl diglycol acetate out of respectively methyl proxitol, ethyl proxitol, butyl
glycol, butyl diglycol and acetic acid in the same plant.
As target the following production is proposed:
Table 3.1 Target production
Methyl proxitol acetate Ethyl proxitol acetate Butyl glycol acetate Butyl diglycol acetate
Purity wt%· 99.5 99.0 99.0 99.0 Prodriêtion (kt/y) 25 10 7.5 7.5
Initially the MPA process is chosen as base case because of the largest production
capacity needed. The other processes are designed with the restriction that they use
the same equipment as the MPA process; the detailed sizing is based on the most
extreme conditions in the particular unit.
The volume of the streams in all processes is kept in the same order. This assumption
is the basis for scheduling of all processes.
3.2 Process definition
3.2.1
Components and reactions
All components that are assumed to play a role in the systems are presented in
Appendix 3
.
1 (Pure components properties).
Itshould be noted that ethylene glycol,
propylene glycol and the diacetates are heavy by-products, all other by-products are
light ends.
Methyl diproxitol acetate, ethyl diproxitol acetate, butyl dioxitol acetate and butyl
trioxitol acetate are heavy by-products in respectively the MPA, the EP A, the BGA
and the BDGA process that are not modelled in Aspen. They are formed in very little
amounts. To create
areasonabie
simulation a suitable kinetic model is needed. It is
very difficult to fit these heavies in the model and because of the small amounts they
can be neglected. Moreover, all these by-products are not present in the Aspen
databases. Creating them would be introducing new uncertainties.
In further investigations of the BDGA process one should keep in mind that there
might occur
a
formation of dioxan
,
a very stabie compound.
The reactions that take place in the reactor for the MP A process are graphically
displayed in Figure 3.1. The reaction schemes of the other processes are similar and
are provided in Appendix 3.2.
CPD 3229, Confidential 3 Basis of design
°
°
O.-H) l o
o~
H.-O .... H/o~
+
I ----..::../o~
+
H...--
Water MP AA MPA O.-H H.-O .... H O.-H /O .... H/o~
+
Water-
~O""H
+
MeOHMP Pglyc
°
)lo
/O .... H ----..::../Oy
H.-O .... H I+
+
H MaOH...--
0 Water MA AA .... H 0 0~O""H
-
Ä
+
H.-O .... H WaterPglyc Propanal
°
°
.... H) l o
o~
0 H.-O .... H~O
.... H+
2 H I...--
----..::..~OIO
+
2 Water Pglyc AA PGDA Figure 3.1 Reaction scheme MP A processAs shown in the reaction schemes each system consists of three (equilibrium)
esterification reactions, an ether cleavage and a dehydration readion. The mechanism
of the esterification is a nucleofilic substitution although it cannot be referred to as a
Sn 1 or Sn2 reaction. This equilibrium reaction is characterised by
a
temporary
addition to the carboxylic group followed by elimination
and
therefore called
nucleofilic substitution trough addition-elimination.
Esterification reactions are catalysed by strong acids.
In literature the following
categories of acidic catalysts are suggested: homogenous catalysts, divided in small
molecules like sulphuric acid and Lewis acids and large molecules like para-toluene
sulfonic acid and heterogeneous catalysts. The advantages and disadvantages are
tabulated in Table 3.2.
CPD 3229, Confidential
Table 3.2 Catalyst selection
Catalyst Sulphuric acid, Lewis minerals Para-toluene sulfonic acid Pro • Cheap • A lot of experience • Possibility of recycling • A lot of experience
Heterogeneous acid • No need for catalyst recycling
• High activity
• Reaction only occurs in the reactor
• Regeneration is possible during shut down periods
3 Basis of design
Conti-à
• Corrosive
-. Difficult to recycle -7 it leaves with water
• Present in a large part of the process • Possibility of reaction outside the
reactor • Corrosive
• Present in a large part of the process • Possibility of reaction outside the
reactor
• Expensive
• Possibility of hot spots
Based on Table 3.2 a heterogeneous catalyst is chosen. Anormal disadvantage of a
heterogeneous catalyst is the regeneration period. In a multi purpose plant one can use
the time between two runs (needed for cleaning, etc.) to regenerate the catalyst.
Literature provides kinetic data on some of the processes for several catalysts. Duolite
ES-276 tums out to have the highest activity and is chosen as catalyst for all
processes.
The kinetic data for this catalyst are derived from data generated in a MP A trial run
[7] and from kinetic data on a zirconium based heterogeneous catalyst [12, 13, 14].
From the trial run the following parameters were known: In- and out-going
component mole flows, residence time, reactor type (batch loop), reactor volume,
catalyst load, kinetic parameters for the esterification of MP and the esterification
equilibrium constant. The kinetic constants for the other reactions in the MP A system
can be estimated from these data combined with mass balances over the reactor.
The other processes are related by the kinetic data for the main esterification reaction
on a zirconium-based catalyst. Three additional assumptions are made:
•
The ratios of all reaction rates in the other systems are the same as the ratios in the
MPA system
.
•
Each system reacts in a similar way on Duolite as on a zirconium-based catalyst.
These ratios do not change with temperature. This assumption can be made
because all reactions have a small temperature effect.
•
The reaction rate of the formation of ethoxy ethyl acetate is approximately the
reaction rate of the fonnation of MP
A.This assumption can be made since ethoxy
ethyl acetate and methyl proxitol acetate have a similar structure and mole mass.
3.2.2
Processes
In order to be able to operate four processes in one plant a separate reactor and
distillation section is chosen. This choice is explained in Chapter 2
.
CPD 3229, Confidential 3 Basis of design
The main objective of the process is to produce as much ether ester as possible in relation to the by-products formed in a tubular reactor. For the esterification process is an equilibrium reaction, the unreacted reactants must be recycled after the separation from the products.
Appendix 2 provides block schemes of each process.
The plant is divided in three sections: reactor section (4100), product purification (4200) and reactants recovery (4300). All unit and stream numbers begin with the number of the section and end with their unique identity, so stream 4101 does exist and stream 4301 does not exist, since a stream '1' is already present. The advantage of this numbering is that a stream can be detected in two ways: by searching for its section and by searching for the sequence of streams.
The operating window of all processes is between 30°C and 160°C and between 0.01 bara and 1 bara. The thermodynamic properties and models are described in Chapter 4.
The pure component properties are presented in Appendix 3.1.
In some of the processes azeotropes occur. The MP A system is the only system in which azeotropes influence the process significantly resulting in the use of an entrainer. As entrainer in the MP A process the use of cyclohexane, butyl acetate, isopropyl ether and 1 ,2-dichloro ethane (DCE) is simulated in Aspen. In Chapter 2 the choice of the entrainer is described in more detail.
3.3 Basic assumptions
3.3.1
Plant location and capacity
The esterification plant will be situated on the existing Shell site in Rotterdam Pemis, the Netherlands. The advantage is that the plant can use all existing administrative and emergency services. For wastewater treatment biotreaters are also available on the site.
The production of the plant is shown below.
Table 3.3 Production capacity
Product
Methyl proxitol acetate Ethyl proxitol acetate Butyl glycol acetate Butyl glycol diacetate Not in use Production [kt/a] 25 17 7.5 7.5 Production per cycIe [kt] 5 3.4 1.5 l.5 Runt!me [hrs/a] 3984 1704 936 696 1440
During the sizing of the flows in all processes, the target production as mentioned in Table 3.1 was obtained in a shorter period than initially planned. Since the EPA process is most profitable, the remaining time is allocated to the production of EP A. As can be seen in Table 3.3 the total production time is set to 7320 hrs/a. The
CPD 3229, Confidential 3 Basis of design
production in a run is 1.5 kt, which results in 5 runs for BGA and BDGA. This is applied to the other products, sa a year consists of 5 cycles of 4 runs (1 run for each product).
The total production is divided in 5 cycles. For each switch 3 days of cleaning is needed, resulting in 12 non operating days per cycle and 60 non operating days a year. The design production is set to 0.16 kt/day (365/305*50 kt/a).
3.3.2
Batterylimit
In the design of the esterification plant an imaginary fence is set around the care of the process: It is assumed that all incoming streams as weIl as all outgoing streams are
actual streams. Storage (reactants and products), cleaning of waste streams and fueIling of lights and heavies are left outside the battery limit. The utilities are assumed to be available in an existing piping system. Equipment for utilities is not induded in this design. Also the regeneration of the catalyst is not taken into account. In Table 3.4 to Table 3.11 all incoming and outgoing streams are defined for each process. In general can be noted that all incoming streams enter the process in pipes at
2SOC
and 1 bara as a liquid and that all outgoing streams leave the plant in pipes at amaximum temperature of 40°C and 1 bara. These streams are liquids as weIl.
Methyl proxitol acetate in- and outgoing strearn
Table 3.4 Incoming stream MPA process
s
tream name A ce IC aCI f ·df d ee M th I e lYI prma 0 ee ·t 1 f d D· hl IC oro e th ane ee f dStream number <4101> <4102> <4340> Consumption [kt/a] 12.05 19.08 2.01
Costs [EURJt] 511 652 161
Commercial AA 99.0 MP 99.5 DCE specifications [wt%] Water 0.1 Water 0.1 Design specifications AA 99.5 MP 99.8 DCE
[wt%] Water 0.5 Water 0.2
Temperature [0C] 25 25 25
Pressure [bara] 1 1 1
Phase Liquid Liquid Liquid
Transport to plant Pipe Pipe Pipe
In both feed streams impurities other than water are neglected because of their assumed inertness. Therefore the design purity of the streams is higher than the commercial specifications. In further investigations one should simulate with the actual impurities.
100 100
In the DCE stream impurities were not taken into account since specifications could not be supplied (DOW chemicals Benelux).
In
further process development it is likely to as su me that the impurities are lights or water. The amounts will be small and will not influence the results significantly.GPD 3229, Gonfidential 3 Basis of design
Table 3.5 Outgoing streams MPA process
Stream namë". MPA (product) Wastewater Lights Heavies.
Stream number <4237> <4347> <4361> <4234>
Production [kt/a] 25.10 6.02 1.72 0.34
Price [EUR/t] 1181 -376 -2189 107
Commercial specifications MPA 99.5 DCE <10%
[wt%] Water 0.03
Design specifications [wt%] MPA 99.9 MP 24.3 DCE 89.0 Pglyc 63.3
Water
-
Water 56.3 Water 4.3 PGDA 2.7Pglyc 0.1 AA 10.4 MP 5.0 MPA 34.0
DCE 7.1
Temperature lOC] 35.4 34.2 40 39.2
Pressure [bara] 1 1 1 1
Phase Liquid Liquid Liquid Liquid
Transport from plant Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe
If the waste streams contain less than 10 wt % of chlorinated compounds a low fee is to be paid for incineration (Wastewater treatment company AVR, The Netherlands). The light ends unfortunately contains more than 10 wt %, making a special expensive treatment necessary (Appendix 11).
Ethyl proxitol acetate in- and outgoing streams
Table 3.6 Incoming streams EPA process
S treamname A ti ce c aCI "d ~ ee d Eth I lyl proXi ï 0 If d ee
Stream number <4101> <4102> Consumption [kt/a] 7.24 12.58 Costs [EUR/t] 511 818 Commercial specifications AA 99.0 EP 99.0 [wt%] Water 0.1 Water 0.1 Design specifications [wt%] AA 98.9 EP 98.9 Water 1.1 Water 1.1 Temperature lOC] 25 25 Pressure [bara] 1 1
Phase Liquid Liquid
Transport to plant Pipe Pipe
To be on a safe side in the simulations - water has a negative effect on the equilibrium reaction - all impurities in the feed streams are assumed to be water. In the MP A process this assumption is not made due to the unwanted effect on the entrainer column.
CPD 3229, Confidential 3 Basis of design
Table 3.7 Outgoing streams EPA process
, Sti'eamname j~ ~:~, "1'EPA (product) ".~."
Wastewáter1':i!;: Hèävies ' ,,..
",' "9C Stream number <4236> <4361> <4235> Production [kt/a] 17.30 2.45 0.08 Price [EURJt] 1519 -256 107 Commercial EPA 99.0 specifications Water 0.1 [wt%]
Design EPA 99.8 Water 94.7 Pglyc 99.5
specifications Water - AA 2.7 PGDA 0.5
[wt%] AA 0.1 EtOH 2.5
Pglyc 0.1
Temperature [0C] 37.9 40 40
Pres su re [bara] 1 1 1
Phase Liquid Liquid Liquid
Transport from Pipe Pipe Pipe
plant
The wastewater stream is treated on site. No fees are paid for treatment of streams
containing less than 500 ppm of organic compounds. Unfortunately this is not the
case. In Chapter 11 the economie aspects of the wastewater treatment are discussed.
The heavyends can be used as fuel elsewhere on site.
Butyl glycol acetate in- and outgoing streams
Table 3.8 lncoming streams BGA process
s
treamname A f ce IC aCI 'd~ ee d B t l l otyl glyco ee l f d Stream number <4101> <4102> Consumption [kt/a] 3.13 6.17 Costs [EURJt] 511 652 Commercial specifications AA 99.0 BG 99.0 [wt%] Water 0.1 Water 0.1 Design specifications AA 99.0 BG 98.9 [wt%] Water 1.0 Water 1.1 Temperature [0C] 25 25 Pressure [bara] 1 1Phase Liquid Liquid
Transport ta plant Pipe Pipe
CPD 3229, Canfidential 3 Basis of design
Table 3.9 Outgoing streams BGA process
Stream name:' .' ." .. BGA (product) Wastewater . Puree
Stream number <4235> <4361> <4239> Production [kt/a] 7.58 1.02 0.66 Price [EURlt] 1125 -256 107 Commercial BGA 99.0 specifications Water 0.1 [wt%]
Design BGA 99.8 Water 96.3 BGA 54.7
specifications Eglyc 0.2 Ethanal 3.4 BG 28.7
[wt%] AA 13.4
BuOH 2.5
Temperature [0C] 40 40 40
Pressure [bara] 1 1 1
Phase Liquid Liquid Liquid
Transport from Pipe Pipe Pipe
plant
See the notes on EP A for the destination of the waste streams.
Butyl di glycol in- and outgoing streams
Table 3.10 Incoming streams BDGA process
s
treamname A cetIc aCI 'df d eeStream number <4101> Consumption [kt/a] 2.33 Costs [EURlt] 511 Commercial specifications
AA
99.0 [wt%] Water 0.1 Design specifications [wt%] AA 98.9 Water 1.1 Temperature [0C] 25 Pressure [bara] 1 Phase LiquidTransport to plant Pipe
B utyl 19lyco eed ldil lf
<4102> 6.29 652 BDG 99.0 Water 0.15 BDG 98.9 Water 1.1 25 1 Liquid Pipe
See the notes on EP A for the large water impurities in the feeds.
Table 3.11 Outgoing streams BDGA process
s
tream name BDGA( (pro oct dw
astewater , asteStream number <4235> <4361> <4353> Production [kt/a] 7.51 0.80 0.28 Price [EURlt] 1125 -256 107 Commercial BDGA 99.0 specifications Water 0.1 [wt%]
Design BDGA 100 Water 91.0 BDG
specifications Water - BuOH 6.7 AA
[wt%] Ethanal 1.3 Eglyc
BuOH EGDA
Temperature [0C] 40 40 40
Pressure [bara] 1 1 1
Phase Liquid Liquid Liquid
Transport from Pipe Pipe Pipe
plant .! 36.7 27.2 31.2 2.7 2.2
CPD 3229, Confidential
All utility requirements for each process are presented below.
Table 3.12 Utility requirements
: ~t>'Y~',
C
00 lOgr
wa er . t ....LP
steam ;' MP steamConditions 20°C, 1 bara 190°C, 3 bara 220°C, 10 bara Costs per unit 0.05 0.68 13.61 [EUR/t],
[EURIkWh]
MPA process 3426 20.6 94.2
[kt/a], [kWh/a]
EPA process [kt/a], 2353 36.5 47.3 [kWh/a] BOA process 810 19.1 15.5 [kt/a], [kWh/a] BDOA process 407 13.8 7.0 [kt/a], [kWh/a] 3 Basis of design EI ectnclty .. , 220V 0.06 25.0 20.0 20.0 25.0
Most of the utilities are used at their maximum limits meaning that the cooling water
leaves the plant at 40°C and that the low pressure and high pressure steam is
condensed, leaving the process at respectively 133
.
5°C and 180°C.
The last requirement is the catalyst: Duolite ES-276. Table 3.13 displays details
.
The
catalyst is regenerated with an acid during the period between two runs.
Table 3.13 Catalyst requirements Catalyst
Requirement [tonnes] Costs [EUR/t] Life time [years]
Duolite ES-276
15 26000
4
3.4 Determination of the margin and maximum allowable investment
3.4.1
Calculation of the margin
The maximum margin on the four produets MPA, EPA
,
BGA and BDGA was
ca1cu!ated by assuming that 1 mole of MP
+
1 mole of AA is used to make 1 mole of
MPA with 100% overall conversion. For EPA
,
BGA and BDGA similar assumptions
have been made. The results are shown in Table 3.14
.
It is c1ear that the real margin
on MPA will have to be corrected for the use of entrainer
,
product conversion and
utilities. Also for the ca1culation no costs for wastewater treatment have been
inc1uded
.
Detailed ca1culation of the real margin is supplied in Chapter 11.
CPD 3229, Confidential 3 Basis of design
Table 3.14 Maximum margins on MPA, EPA, BGA and BDGA
EP AA EPA 104.15 60.05 146.14 162.23 60.05 204.27 1300 1000 2000 1.30 210.90 1.00 60.05 2.00 408.54
3.4.2
Calculation of the maximum allowable investment
For all calculations the Shell market prices have been used. To determine the margin per year these values have to be multiplied by the number of production days. The margin as show in Table 3.16 is 23.56 Million EURO. Correcting this value with an Earning power of 15% with a plant life of 10 years and 2 construction years, the maximum allowable investment is 102.82 Million EURO. A detailed calculation is shown in Table 3.15.
Table 3.15 Margins
PROFIT MARGIN DISCOUNTED PROFIT MARGIN Annual Year MEURO Construction Construction 2 Production 3 23.56 Production 4 23.56 Production 5 23.56 Production 6 23.56 Production 7 23.56 Production 8 23.56 Production 9 23.56 Production 10 23.56 Production 11 23.56 Production 12 23.56 TOTAL 235.60
Table 3.16 Margin per annum Raw materiarprofit .
Production days
Production (kt/a)
Profit per annum (M DEM)
Profit per annum (M EURO)
3.4.3
Conclusion
Accumulative Factor Annual Accumulative MEURO 0.15 MEURO MEURO
1.000 0.870 23.56 0.756 17.81 17.81 47.12 0.658 15.49 33.31 70.68 0.572 13.47 46.78 94.24 0.497 11.71 58.49 117.80 0.432 10.19 68.68 141.36 0.376 8.86 77.53 164.92 0.327 7.70 85.23 188.48 0.284 6.70 91.93 212.04 0.247 5.82 97.76 235.60 0.215 5.06 102.82 102.82
MPA"EPA BGA BDGA TOTAL
166 71 39 29
25.10 17.30 7.58 7.51
17.33 18.64 5.05 5.06 46.08 8.86 9.53 2.58 2.59 23.56
Looking at the raw margins on the products the margin for EP A is the most interesting. Especially wh en taking into account that MPA will have additional
CPD 3229, Confidential 3 Basis of design
the waste streams
. Unfortunately the European market for EPA (4 kt/a) compared to
CPD 3229, Confidential 4 Thermodynamic properties and reaction kinetics
4 Thermodynamic properties and reaction kinetics
For the design of the multi purpose plant several th.ermodynamic properties and reaction constants were found in literature [17][18], however most of the
thermodynamic properties are taken from the Aspen Plus 10.0 databanks. In this chapter the validity of the parameters is checked within the operating window. Also the reaction rates are discussed.
4.1
Thermodynamic properties
4.1 .1
Operating window
Comparing the four processes, the equipment for reaction and distillation is the same but the temperatures and pressures are different. For each process and each unit the operating window is determined (TabIe 4.1 & Table 4.2).
Table 4.1 Operating windows temperature (0C)
UNIT MPA P EPA P BGA P BDGA - P
Min Max top Min Max top Min Max top Min 0< iMáx top
R4101 80.0 92.9 1 35 4L5 I 80.0 88.7 I 80.0 95.0 I C4201 105.2 140.0 I 100.3 141.0 I 103.9 129.0 1 93.8 156.5 I C4202 138.9 145.4 I 132.9 157.8 I 95.7 148.0 0.5 56.4 164.5 0.1 C4203 35.4 39.2 0.01 37.9 79.1 0.01 43.6 60.5 0.01 107.3 116.7 0.01 C4304 34.7 91.2 I 63.4 72.9 I 65.5 77.8 0.25 40.7 74.9 0.05 C4305 67.6 83.6 I 97.0 119.6 1 98.6 117.6 I 92.5 100.2 I
The maximum operating window is from 35°C to 164.5 °C and from 0.01 to 1 bara.
Table 4.2 Operating window pressure (bara)
UNIT MPA EPA BGA BDGA
Bottom To Bottom To Bottom To Bottom
1.17 1.00 1.37 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.15 1.88 1.00 1.43 0.50 1.36 0.10 0.58 0.14 0.01 0.24 0.01 0.29 0.01 0.33 0.42 0.25 0.39 0.25 0.47 0.05 0.51 1.27 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.29 1.00 1.20
4
.
1.2
Component properties
Due to the fact that only a few literature values were found, most of the properties were taken from Aspen databanks. The properties that were not present were estimated with the UNIF AC group contribution method. All the components were present in the databank except EP, EP A and PGDA. Of those components the
molecular weight, boiling point and molecular structure from literature were used for estimation by UNIF AC and for the estimation of the vapour pressure by the Riedel estimation method.
4.1
.
3
Thermodynamic models
This process consists of polar components, which are non-electrolytes. The applied pressure is smaller than 10 bar, interaction parameters are known (Aspen) and the
CPD 3229, Confidential 4 Thermodynamic properties and reaction kinetics
Wilson model cannot be used. As stated in the Basis of design, chapter 3, the Non
Random Two Liquid (NRTL) model was used for all the process simulations. This
model is used for vapour-liquid-liquid equilibria. To incorporate the chemical theory of dimerisation (for acetic acid) and to account for strong association and solvation effects, the Hayden-O'Connell (HOC) and Nothnagel (NTH) variants of above model were used. For the MP A, BGA and BDGA process the HOC model was used. Since the HOC model was not able to give proper results due to missing dipole moments the NTH model was applied to the EP A process.
4.1.4
Azeotropes
In
some of the processes azeotropes occur. They are tabulated in Error! Referencesouree not found .. The MP A system is the only system in which azeotropes influence the process significantly resulting in the use of an entrainer. This is due to the fact that the boiling points of the relevant components are very closely related.
In
the other systems the boiling points differ more substantially. A reduction of pressure in the second column solves the azeotropic problem. In Appendix 12 T,x,y-plots of all possible binary azeotropes in the four systems are supplied. As entrainer in the MPAprocess the use of cyclohexane, butyl-acetate, isopropyl ether and 1,2-dichloro ethane
(DCE) was simulated in Aspen. DCE is the only entrainer with reasonabie results. In Chapter 1.2 the choice of the entrainer is described in more detail.
Table 4.3 Azeotropes in the process
MPAPROCESS
Compound AzeotrClQes with ...
Methyl proxitol Water, acetic acid
Methyl proxitol acetate Acetic acid
EPA PROCESS
Compound AzeotrClQes with ...
Ethyl proxitol Water, acetic acid
Ethyl proxitol acetate
-BGA PROCESS
Compound AzeotrClQes with ...
Butyl glycol Water
Butyl glycol acetate
-BDGA PROCESS
Compound Azeotropes with ...
Butyl diglycol
-Butyl diglycol acetate
-4.1.5
Data accuracy and validation
Unfortunately the number of literature values of the pure components is very limited. The only values found are presented in the pure component list (Appendix 3.1). These literature parameters are verified with the values in the Aspen database. Since these
values were practically identical, the assumption was made that the thermodynamic parameters were correct. In spite of this verification the thermodynamic properties could not be validated. Due to the use of data supplied by the Aspen databanks serious uncertainty is introduced to the simulations which can only be reduced by laboratory testing.
CPD 3229, Confidential 4 Thermodynamic properties and reaction kinetics
4.2 Reaction kinetics
The method of obtaining the reaction kinetics is explained in Chapter 3. This will be
summarised here. From a trial run all data on the catalyst Duolite ES 276 are known
for the esterification of MP to MP
A.
Also the amount of by-products is known.
The first step was to develop a plausible reaction scheme (Appendix 3.2); the result
consists of 8 reactions. Then mass balances over the reactor for each component were
set up. Every reaction is assumed to be first order in all reactants. By trial and error in
an Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) solver the overall reaction constants
(including the influence of the catalyst) we re obtained.
The amount of by-products formed is insignificantly small. Therefore the ratios of the
reaction rates for the formation of by-products and the reaction rate of the main
reaction are assumed to be constant for all four processes, independent of temperature.
For the MP A process this leads to the following overall constants:
Table 4.4 Reaction rates MP A process
Reaction MP + AA -7 MPA + H20 MP A + H20 -7 MP + AA MP + H20 -7 Pglyc + MeOH AA + MeOH -7 MA + H20 MA + H20 -7 AA + MeOH Pglyc ~ Propanal + H20 Pglyc + 2 AA -7 PGDA + 2 H20 PGDA + 2 H20 -7 Pglyc + 2 AA
Overall reaction rateconstant at 80°C 8.73.10-4 [m3j(kmol·s)J 4.22.10-4 [m3j(kmol·s)J 2.03.10-6 [m3j(kmol·s)J 1.52.10-6 [m3j(kmol·s)J 3.42.10-5 [m3j(kmol·s)J 3_25.10-5 [lIsJ 2.03.10-6 [m6j(kmofs)J 7.12.10-6 [m6j(kmoe·s)J
The kinetic data for the other processes are deduced from a comparison of the MP A
kinetics on two catalysts: Duolite and Zirconium base catalyst [12, 13, 14] (See
Chapter 3).
This comparison results in the following kinetic constants for the other processes.
Table 4.5 Reaction rates EPA process
Reaction EP + AA -7 EP A + H20 EPA + H20 -7 EP + AA EP + H20 -7 Pglyc + EthOH AA + EthOH -7 EA + H20 EA + H20 -7 AA + EthOH Pglyc ~ Propanal + H20 Pglyc + 2 AA -7 PGDA + 2 H20 PGDA + 2 H20 -7 Pglyc + 2 AA
Overall reaction rate constant
" at 35°C ' 1.82·10-4 [m3j(kmol·s)J 8.80.10-5 [m3j(kmol·s)J 4.24.10-7 [m3j(kmol·s)J 3.18.10-7 [m3j(kmol·s)J 5.54.10-6 [m3j(kmol·s)J 2.26.10-6 [lIsJ 1.41.10-7 [m6j(kmoI2·s)J 4.95.10-7 [m6j(kmoI2s)J
CPD 3229, Confidential
Table 4.6 Reaction rates BGA process
BG + AA -7 BGA + H20 BGA + H20 -7 BG + AA BG + H20 -7 Eglyc + BuOH AA + BuOH -7 BA + H20 BA + H20 -7 AA + BuOH Eglyc -? Ethanal + H20 Eglyc + 2 AA -7 EGDA + 2 H20 EGDA + 2 H20 -7 Eglyc + 2 AA
4 Thermodynamic properties and reaction kinetics
Overnllreaction iàte constánt
--.. ~i,/
at80
0ë
it ,:" . 1.31.10-3 [m3/(kmol's)] 6.33·10-4 [m3/(kmol·s)] 3.05.10-6 [m3/(kmol·s)] 2.28-10-6 [m3/(kmol·s)] 2.77.10-5 [m3/(kmol·s)] 3.25-10-5 [l/s] 2.03.10-6 [m6/(kmofs)] 7.12.10-6 [m6/(kmoI2 ·s)]Table 4.7 Reaction rates BDGA process Reactión BDG + AA -7 BDGA + H20 BDGA + H20 -7 BDG + AA BDG + 2 H20 -7 2 Eglyc + BuOH AA + BuOH -7 BA + H20 BA + H20 -7 AA + BuOH Eglyc -? Ethanal + H20 Eglyc + 2 AA -7 EGDA + 2 H20 EGDA + 2 H20 -7 Eglyc + 2 AA
Overall reaction rateconstant at 80°C 1.05.10-3 [m3/(kmol's)] 5.06.10-4 [m3/(kmol·s)] 1.45.10-6 [m6/(kmofs)] 1.83.10-6 [m3/(kmol·s)] 2.22.10-5 [m3/(kmol·s)] 3.25.10-5 [1/s] 2.03.10-6 [m6/(kmoI2 ·s)] 7.12.10-6 [m6/(kmoI2·s)]
CPD 3229, Confidential 5 Process structure and selection
5 Process structure and selection
5.1 Design criteria and unit selection
The multi purpose plant is designed on the production of MP A. This process has to operate the main part of the year besides that it is the most difficult process due to the need for an entrainer. Af ter the plant lay out and the determination of the number of trays per columns were known the other three processes were designed. The only restrictions for the design of the processes for EP A, BGA and BDGA are the nu mb er of columns and trays. The overall design was optimised by trial and error methods in all processes. The detailed design of the equipment is based on the extreme values in all processes.
Overall criteria are the temperatures, which are not allowed to be higher than 165DC or lower than 30DC in order to be able to use normal cooling water for cooling and low and medium pressure steam for heating.
In the following subsections the selections made in each process will be explained.
5.1.1
Design of the methyl proxitol acetate process
The basic block scheme as provided in Appendix 2 consists of a reaction section, a product purification section and a reactant recovery section. As design specification all reactants recovered anywhere in the process are fed back to the reactor to obtain the highest possible overall conversion.
As reactor a fixed bed tubular adiabatic reactor is taken, because the main reaction is first order in both reactants. Therefore the concentration of these reactants will have to be kept as high as possible. The kinetics of all reactions are provided and explained in Chapter 4. To be able to use this kinetics the fluids in the reactor have to be in the liquid phase. As design temperature 80DC is taken; the reaction is reasonably fast, there are no gases present (water boils at 100DC) and the formation of by-products is limited. The diameter length ratio of the reactor is set to
Ik
With these criteria the reactor size is optimised in Aspen Plus, resulting in a length of 8.5 meters and a diameter of 2.2 meters.
The task of column C4201 is to remove all the water from the product (MP A) and to get as little reactants as possible over the top. In the first simulations the dichloro ethane entrainer was added in this column, but the simulations proved that by adding the azeotropic agent to the next column better results could be obtained. When the entrainer was added in C4201, the large amounts of methyl proxitol caused serious problems with the phase split in the decanter. With these boundary values the C4201 column was simulated and optimised in Aspen Plus.
The bottom of C4201 is the feed of C4202. The purpose of this column is to recover all reactants in order to recycle them. A design criterion is that all reactants and as little product as possible must go over the top.
CPD 3229, Confidential 5 Process structure and selection
In order to recover the reactants from the top stream of C4201 a distillation (C4304) with an azeotropic agent will have to be performed. In Chapter 2 the choice for dichloro ethane is explained. A design criterion is that all dichloro ethane willieave C4304 over the top and as much reactants as possible through the bottom. The separation is optimal at high vacuum with the restriction that the top temperature cannot be lower than 30°C. This leads to a column pressure of 0.25 bara. The top stream is led to a decanter. Here the resulting water stream may hardly contain any reactants or dichloro ethane. The top stream of C4304 is 34.7°C and will not further be cooled or heated.
In the last column (C4305) dichloro ethane has to be recovered. Section 4300 is optimised for the amount of entrainer feed. The less fresh entrainer feed is added the less dichloro ethane will be present in the waste streams. The entrainer flow in the recycle is kept at 45 kmol/hr, setting it as a design specification in Aspen, because this molar flow turned out to be the optimal amount. The 45 kmol/hr is maintained by varying the distillate to feed ratio in C4305.
5.1.2
Design of the ethyl proxitol acetate process
As mentioned before the EP A process is designed within the hardware limits set by the MP A process. All processes were initially designed with a 70 kmol/hr feed stream. Later on this is reduced to the molar flow necessary for the target production (50 kmollhr) except for the EPA process. Here the feed streams are kept at 70 kmol/hr since this is the most profitable process.
The reaction mixture in the EP A process is cooled to 35°C to ensure a high selectivity towards the main esterification reaction. This was not needed in the other processes.
Varying the reflux ratios and the distillate to feed ratios optimises the columns C4201, C4202 and C4203. The reactants recovered in C4202 are recycled.
Contrary to the MPA process in the EPA process no entrainer (and thus no decanter) is required to recover all reactants. Again the design variables were the reflux ratio and the distillate to feed ratio.
It
was not possible to regain all reactants in one column, so C4305 is used to recover the last bit of reactants. All reactants (bottom streams of C4304 and C4305) are recycled.5.1.3
Design of the butyl glycol acetate process
In the EGA process it is possible to operate the reactor at 80°C without loss of selectivity.
In section 4200 the columns are optimised in the same way as in the EP A process: by varying the reflux ratios and the distillate to feed ratios. In column C4203 a problem occurs: The bottom stream contains all EGA and in the top stream that has to be recycled, too much butanol is present. This butanol would cause accumulation in the process, so a purge is required. The top stream of C4202 and the main part of the top stream of C4203 are recyc1ed to the reactor. This recycle system is optimised by reducing the purge stream.