• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Show that there is some x with f0(x

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Show that there is some x with f0(x"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Problem set 14: theorems about derivatives.

(1) Assume that f : R → R is differentiable and limx→−∞f (x) = limx→∞f (x). Show that there is some x with f0(x) = 0.

(2) Find a function f : R → R and distinct x1, x2 ∈ R such that f(x1) = f (x2) but there is no x ∈ R with f0(x) = 0.

(3) Let f : R → R be differentiable. Suppose that there is some h ∈ R such that f (x + h) = f (x) for all x ∈ R. Show that there is some x0 ∈ R with f0(x0) = 0.

(4) Let f : R → R be defined by f (x) = x2sin(x). Show that there is a point x ∈ R such that f00(x) = 0.

(5) Find all local minima of f : [0, ∞) → R defined as f (x) = (x − 3)3+ 5.

(6) Assume that f : (a, b) → R is twice differentiable, where a, b ∈ R with a < b. Show that if f00 is constant 0, then f (x) = αx + β for some real α and β.

(7) Find a nonconstant function f : R → R that attains a local minimum in uncount- able many points.

(8) Assume that f, g: R → R are both convex. Is g ◦ f convex as well?

(9) Assume that f, g: R → R are both convex. Is f g convex as well?

(10) Compute limx→0exsin(x)−e−x. (11) Compute limx→1+log x

x2−1. (12) Compute limx→03x−2x x. (13) Compute limx→π

2

1−sin(x)+cos(x)+x−π2 sin(2x)−cos(x) . (14) Compute limx→∞log(log(log(x)))

x .

(15) Compute limx→∞ 1 − axx

, where a is a real number.

(16) What is limx→∞x1/x? (17) Compute limx→1

1

log xlog xx  . (18) Calculate limx→0

1

x2sin(x)1  .

1

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Moreover, in Musielak–Orlicz sequence spaces, criteria for the Banach–Saks property, the near uniform convexity, the uniform Kadec–Klee property and property (H) are given... 1. Let

The first step of our proof is a general “scattered” reduction of the theorem to the same statement but now only for metric spaces M which are both nowhere locally compact

[r]

Suma operatorów domkniętych o wspólnej gęstej dziedzinie nie musi być operatorem domy- kalnym.. Aby to zobaczyć, rozważmy

Notice that for any family ∆ of functionals having a positive Weyl chamber we can define a set of simple roots in the way that (2.18) holds. For that we take the set ˜ ∆ of

It chooses the best p parameters, which fulfill optimization conditions based on solving subproblems with linear constraint included.. Based on these conditions I will describe

A general discussion for balanced domains of holomorphy (like the above for n-circled domains) is still lacking.... Proof of

Let K be the compact space generated by this family of functions (see the beginning of this section for the definition of K).. Then the space K has the