• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Adaptive capacity of buildings: A determination method to promote flexible and sustainable construction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Adaptive capacity of buildings: A determination method to promote flexible and sustainable construction"

Copied!
31
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY OF BUILDINGS

A DETERMINATION METHOD TO PROMOTE FLEXIBLE AND SUSTAINABLE

CONSTRUCTION

18-3-2014

Rob Geraedts

(2)

Context

The adap�ve capacity of a building

contains all characteris�cs which

make it possible that the building

preserves the necessary

func�onality during its technical life

cycle on a sustainable and

economical way with changing

demands and circumstances



  Target group:

–  Ownes –  Users



  Aim method:

To look for an op�mum between

de demand for and the supply of

the adap�ve capacity of

buildings.Vinden van op�mum

tussen de vraag naar en het

aanbod van Adap�ef Vermogen.

Op�mum with respect to:

–  The adap�ve capacity –  The financial / economic efficiency –  The sustainability impact



  New and exis�ng buildings

(3)

Accommoda�on Process Cycle

Adapt: - Loca�on - Building - Units Other Exis�ng Building Construc�onal Interven�ons New Building Development new & Temporary Accommoda�on Demand from: - Society - Clients - Users Desirable use of

building Characteris�cs building Supply: Sa�sfies: - Loca�on - Building - Units Move out YES NO

(4)

Adapt: - Loca�on - Building - Units Other Exis�ng Building Construc�onal Interven�ons New Building Development new & Temporary Accommoda�on Demand from: - Society - Clients - Users Desirable use of

building Characteris�cs building Supply: Sa�sfies: - Loca�on - Building - Units Move out YES NO

(5)

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Organiza�onal

flexibility Process flexibility Product flexibility Organiza�on Building

Ini�al phase Design phase Construc�on phase Use phase Transforma�on

flexibility flexibility Use

Hoofdonderscheid flexibiliteit Ontwikkelings- Fasen gebouw Flexibiliteit in de gebruiksfase op 3 niveaus A. Loca�on B. Building C. Unit

Adap�ve Capacity

(6)

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

Organiza�onal

flexibility Process flexibility Product flexibility Organiza�on Building

Ini�al phase Design phase Construc�on phase Use phase Transforma�on

flexibility flexibility Use A. Loca�on

B. Building C. Unit

(7)

What is the value of the adap�ve capacity of the built environment for the 3 target groups ? Aimed for essen�al future scenarios of the built environment Users Owners Society Accommoda�on is adaptable to a changing primary process A building with a highest possible profitability during the ownership cycle Real estate that contributes to an a�rac�ve and sustainable living and working environment Note The main ques�on of the society will not be elaborated further. Star�ng point is that this aim will be taken along by the owners and users of buildings.

Main ques�on 3 target groups

(8)

Users Owners Society Accommoda�on is adaptable to a changing primary process A building with a highest possible profitability during the ownership cycle Real estate that contributes to an a�rac�ve and sustainable living and working environment

(9)

Demand for Use Dynamics

Demand

Demand for Transforma�on Dynamics 3 sorts of Flexibility (AIM) 2 sorts of Flexibility (MEANS) Rearrange

flexibility Extension flexibility Rejec�on flexibility

Demand by 3 target groups Changing Demand (use phase) - Society - Owner - User Loca�on – Building – unit(unit) Construc�on / Technical characteris�cs Supply by 3 levels Spa�al / Func�onal characteris�cs

Match between Demand & Supply

Supply

Demand for use dynamics and transforma�on dynamics

(10)

Demand for

Use Dynamics Transforma�on Dynamics Demand for Rearrange

flexibility Extension flexibility Rejec�on flexibility Changing Demand (use phase) - Society - Owner - User Loca�on – Building – unit(unit) Construc�on / Technical characteris�cs Spa�al / Func�onal characteris�cs

Supply

Demand

(11)

EIGENAAR Gevraagd door de eigenaar op gebouwniveau: -Herbestemmings-dynamiek. Aangeboden: -Herindelings-, -Uitbreidings- en -Afsto�ngs-flexibiliteit. GEBRUIKER Gevraagd door de gebruiker op unitniveau: -Gebruiks-dynamiek. Aangeboden: -Herindelings-, -Uitbreidings- en -Afsto�ngs-flexibiliteit. ADAPTIEF VERMOGEN: VRAAG & AANBOD VANUIT 2 DOELGROEPEN Owner User Demand on building level: - Transforma�on dynamics Supply: - Rearrange flexibility - Extension flexibility - Rejec�on flexibility Demand on unit level: - Use dynamics Supply: - Rearrange flexibility - Extension flexibility - Rejec�on flexibility

(12)

ADAPTIEF VERMOGEN: VRAAG & AANBOD VANUIT 2 DOELGROEPEN Owner User Demand on building level: - Transforma�on dynamics Supply: - Rearrange flexibility - Extension flexibility - Rejec�on flexibility Demand on unit level: - Use dynamics Supply: - Rearrange flexibility - Extension flexibility - Rejec�on flexibility

(13)

Owner - Building Transforma�on Dynamics Indicators E1. Reallocate / Redesign E2. Grain size E3. Facili�es E4. Quality Rearrange Flexibility E5. Expansion Extension Flexibility E6. Rejec�on E7. Transfer Rejec�on Flexibility

7 Transforma�on Indicators

Owner building (code E)

(14)

Owner - Building Transforma�on Dynamics Indicators E1. Reallocate / Redesign E2. Grain size E3. Facili�es E4. Quality Rearrange Flexibility E5. Expansion Extension Flexibility E6. Rejec�on E7. Transfer Rejec�on Flexibility

(15)

E1. Reallocate / Redesign E2. Grain size E3. Facili�es E4. Quality E5. Expansion E6. Rejec�on E7. Transfer E1. Reallocate / Redesign   Demands / wishes for the possibility of changing of size and par��on of user units within building (to combine, to split up, to rearrange);   Demands / wishes for the possibility of changing layouts on building level ;   Demands / wishes for the possibility of the changing of func�ons on building level.

7 Transforma�on Indicators

Owner building (code E)

(16)

E1. Reallocate / Redesign E2. Grain size E3. Facili�es E4. Quality E5. Expansion E6. Rejec�on E7. Transfer E2. Grain size   Demands / wishes for possibili�es to change the number of units in the building. E3. Facili�es   Demands / wishes for changing the facili�es within the building and/ or   Changing the facili�es outside the building, on loca�on.

7 Transforma�on Indicators

Owner building (code E)

(17)

E1. Reallocate / Redesign E2. Grain size E3. Facili�es E4. Quality E5. Expansion E6. Rejec�on E7. Transfer E4. Quality   The possibility to change (upgrade) the interior design and finishing per unit and / or   The possibility to change (upgrade) the design and finishing of the building.

7 Transforma�on Indicators

Owner building (code E)

(18)

E1. Reallocate / Redesign E2. Grain size E3. Facili�es E4. Quality E5. Expansion E6. Rejec�on E7. Transfer E5. Expansion   The usable area of the building has to be expandable in the future (horizontal and / or ver�cal). E6. Rejec�on   The usable area of the building has to be detachable in the future (horizontal and / or ver�cal). E7. Transfer   The building has to be transferable to another loca�on in the future.

7 Transforma�on indicators

Owner building (code E)

?

(19)

User- Unit Use Dynamics Indicators G1. Redesign G2. Reallocate Internal G3. Rela�on Internal G4. Quality G5. Facili�es Rearrange Flexibility G6. Expansion Extension Flexibility G7. Rejec�on Rejec�on Flexibility

7 Use indicators

Users building (code G)

(20)

User- Unit Use Dynamics Indicators G1. Redesign G2. Reallocate Internal G3. Rela�on Internal G4. Quality G5. Facili�es Rearrange Flexibility G6. Expansion Extension Flexibility G7. Rejec�on Rejec�on Flexibility

(21)

G1. Redesign G2. Reallocate Internal G3. Rela�on Internal G4. Quality G5. Facili�es G6. Expansion G7. Rejec�on G1. Redesign   Demands / wishes for possibili�es to rearrange the user unit in the building and / or   Demands / wishes to change the func�ons of the user unit in the building.

7 Use indicators

Users building (code G)

(22)

G1. Redesign G2. Reallocate Internal G3. Rela�on Internal G4. Quality G5. Facili�es G6. Expansion G7. Rejec�on G2. Reallocate Internal Changing of demands / wishes for the loca�on of the user unit in the building. G3. Rela�on Internal Changing of demands / wishes for the internal rela�on with other users / stakeholders in the building. G4. Quality Changing of demands / wishes for the interior design and finishing of the unit (look & feel) in the building.

7 Use indicators

Users building (code G)

(23)

G1. Redesign G2. Reallocate Internal G3. Rela�on Internal G4. Quality G5. Facili�es G6. Expansion G7. Rejec�on G5. Facili�es   Changing of demands / wishes for the facili�es within the unit) and / or   Changing of demands / wishes for the facili�es within the building and / or   Changing of demands / wishes for the facili�es outside the building on loca�on.

7 Use indicators

Users building (code G)

(24)

G1. Redesign G2. Reallocate Internal G3. Rela�on Internal G4. Quality G5. Facili�es G6. Expansion G7. Rejec�on G6. Expansion The area of the user unit must be expandable in the future. G7. Rejec�on The area of the user unit must become smaller in the future by rejec�ng parts of the units.

7 Use indicators

Users building (code G)

(25)

VRAAG ADAPTIEF VERMOGEN

STAP 5B: EIGENAARSVRAAG VERTAALD NAAR VOLUMEDYNAMIEK GEBOUWNIVEAU

Meetwaarden

1

(26)

Spa�al / Func�onal characteris�cs

Example

Transforma�on Dynamics Indicators for Realloca�on / Redesign A. Spa�al / Func�onal flexibility

(27)

Technical characteris�cs

Example

Transforma�on Dynamics Indicators for Realloca�on / Redesign B. Technical flexibility

(28)

Assessment Readings - Example

In het Afwegingsmodel Adap�ef Vermogen wordt voor elk beoordelingsaspect van zowel de Ruimtelijk/func�onele flexibiliteit als de Installa�e/technische flexibiliteit een waardering gegeven met bijbehorende 4 meetwaarden voor het formuleren van de vraag of het beoordelen van het aanbod Voorbeeld van een (deel van) een Nota�eformulier

(29)

Vraag- en Aanbodprofielen

Met deze methode kunnen ook vraag- en aanbodprofielen gemaakt worden. Een vraagprofiel t.b.v. een PVE voor een adap�ef nieuw of een te herbestemmen bestaand gebouw. Een aanbodprofiel waarmee het adap�ef vermogen van een bestaand gebouw in kaart gebracht kan worden en vervolgens vergeleken met een specifiek vraagprofiel.

Assessment aspects

Flexibility Demand

Flexibility Supply

(30)

Assessment aspects

Flexibility Demand

Flexibility Supply

(31)

AFWEGINGSMODEL ADAPTIEF VERMOGEN

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Społeczna innowacja ma wielkie znaczenie dla poprawy wzrostu gospodarczego oraz kohezji społecznej i może być siłą napędową zarówno dla sektora publicznego, który funkcjonuje

178 Dobra materialne, wyposażenie i dochody parafii, duchowieństwa .... Parafia na

selection of power modules lies in realization of switching on/off control algorithm to obtain optimal load coefficient value and keeping it within set range.. To implement

In the first part of this paper we introduce the theoretical framework of packing algorithms and genetic algorithms as well as the traditional design process and the nature of design

Kozłowski (Warszawa, UW) – Polycarp as a Christian gymnosophist (ang.); Natalia Lazurkevych (Lviv, UCU) – The perfect human being according to Irenaeus of Lyon (ukrain.); Olexandra

Wśród pozycji związanych z myślą Ojców Kościoła, jakie ukazały się w ostatnim czasie, z dużą satysfakcją odnotowujemy te, które wiążą się z tra­ dycją

The tests on the gas sensors were performed in a Gas Sensor Characterization System (GSCS, Kenosistec equipment) setting temperature and RH at 22 °C and 50%, respectively.

Abstract— We consider the use of the nuclear norm operator, and its tendency to produce low rank results, to provide a convex relaxation of Bilinear Matrix Inequalities (BMIs).. The