Multiple Wake Vortex Lattice Method for Airborne
Wind Energy Membrane-Wing Kites
Rachel Leuthold,
Roland Schmehl
r.c.leuthold@student.tudelft.nl, TU Delft Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Figure 1: Wake Deformation on a Clark-Y-Profile Paraglider found with a Single-Wake VLM at α = −4o.
Problem Statement
The proper modelling of Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) effects (aeroelasticity) of LEI tube kites requires the aerodynamic sur-face pressure distribution on the wing. FSI modelling requires an aerodynamic model that is fast and accurate, but flow separa-tion is the primary source of modelling error when potential-flow models are applied to membrane wings like the LEI kite (Rojrat-sirikul et al, 2009).
With a measured range of angle of attack α of 50o and a ge-ometry containing a backwards-facing step, the degree of flow separation is significant though the kite does not exhibit the characteristic behavior of full-stall during normal operation.
Figure 2: Flow Separation Regions on the LEI Profile, and VLMMW Vorticity Discretization into Vortex Rings
Multiple-wake potential-flow vortex models are well established to model flow separation for 3D rigid wings and for 2D membrane wings, leading to the hypothesis that a quasi-steady multiple-wake vortex lattice method (VLMMW) can quickly and accurately model surf-kite aerodynamics to generate aerodynamic surface load distributions.
Multiple-Wake Vortex Lattice Method
Generate Geometry or Rearrange Inputs for Position and
Veloc-ity of Surface Points
Discretize Grid Initial Bound Circulation Strength + Initial Wake Shape Assumption
+ Known Separation Locations
Convect Wake Nodes with Velocity at Downstream Node
Compute Vortex Core Size, including Filament Stretching
Compute Induction via Vatistas Core Model Use Normal Vectors to Determine Neumann BC
Compute New Bound Circulation Strength by Solving Boundary Condition
Split Circulation Strength between Wakes for
Conservation of Circulation
Convergence?
Sum Velocity on the Surface Nodes
Determine Loads and Pressure Distribution via Kutta-Joukowski
Surface Pressure Distribution
no yes
First Results:
Single-Wake Clark-Y-Profile Paraglider
−10 0 10 20 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 α [deg] CL [-] Single−Wake VLM 3D Viscous LLT (Leloup, 2014) STAR−CCM+ (Maneia, 2007) −100 0 10 20 30 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 α [deg] CD [-]
Figure 3: Lift and Drag Polars found with a Single-Wake VLM.
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering