• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

A Facelift Procedure for Resection of Benign Parapharyngeal Tumors

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Facelift Procedure for Resection of Benign Parapharyngeal Tumors"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

However, the role of facelift procedures in the resection of PPS tumors has not previously been reported on. This prompted us to analyze the feasibility, surgical outcomes and possible risks and complications encountered during facelift procedures for patients with such tumors.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of the clinical records of 10 patients (5 male, 5 female, mean age 47.3 years), treated for PPS tumors using the facelift procedure from April 2015 to August 2019. In all cases, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and com- puted tomography (CT) were conducted to confirm the mass site and size, its relationship with the surrounding vessels and nerves, and the nature of the tumors before surgery.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for pathological diagnosis was conducted in all cases before surgery at least once. For esthetic reasons, the facelift procedure, using a retro-auricular incision and positioning the cut close to the hairline to disguise the most visible part of the scar was applied. All operations were carried out under general anesthesia with the patient in a supine posi- tion. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

ABBREVIATIONS

CT – computed tomography

FNAC – Fine-needle aspiration cytology MRI – magnetic resonance imaging PPS– parapharyngeal space

INTRODUCTION

Although parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors are rare and ac- count for only 0.5% of head and neck neoplasms, various surgi- cal procedures for PPS tumors have been described in response to histopathological diagnosis (benign or malignant), location (prestyloid or poststyloid) and tumor size [1, 2]. Various surgical procedures, including transcervical, transcervical-transparotid, transcervical-transmandibular, transoral, and transoral robotic surgery have been performed in patients with PPS tumors [1–3].

Postoperative scars on visible parts cause aesthetic problems for PPS tumor patients after surgery. Our facelift procedure is con- ducted using a retro-auricular incision and positioning the cut close to the hairline to disguise the most visible part of the scar and thus has the potential to improve aesthetic outcomes [4, 5].

A Facelift Procedure for Resection of Benign

Parapharyngeal Tumors

Nobuo Ohta

1,2

, Kentaro Matsuura

3

, Hiroshi Osafune

3

, Takahiro Suzuki

1

, Naoya Noguchi

1

, Ryoto Hirabayashi

1

, Shiori

Kitaya

1

, Yusuke Kusano

1

, Yutaro Saito

1

, Rei Kawata

1

, Ryoukichi Ikeda

1

, Yusuke Ishida

1,4

, Hiroki Shimada

5

, Keigo

Murakami

5

, Kazuhiro Murakami

5

, Yasuhiro Nakamura

5

, Kota Wada

3

1Division of Otolaryngology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Japan

2Department of Otolaryngology, Yamagata City Hospital Saiseikan, Yamagata, Japan

3Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

4Division of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan

5Division of Pathology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan

Article history: Received: 21.05.2020 Accepted: 01.06.2020 Published: 01.06.2020

ABSTRACT: Objective: The feasibility, surgical outcomes and possible risks and complications encountered during a facelift procedure for patients with parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumor were analyzed.

Method: This retrospective analysis examined 10 patients who underwent surgery for PPS tumor using a facelift incision at our institutes between April 2015 and August 2019.

Results: This study included four retro-styloid (benign nerve sheath tumor) and six pre-styloid tumors (pleomorphic adenoma). Mean tumor dimensions were 4.1 x 4.2 x 3.8 cm respectively. None of the patients needed conversion to conventional open resection. Transient sensory changes in the auricle occurred in 30%

of the patients; however, all recovered within four months. In all the patients, postoperative scars were fully concealed by the auricle and hair. No recurrences were detected during a mean follow-up period of 16.6 months.

Conclusion: The facelift procedure provides adequate visualization, workspace and excellent cosmetic results in properly selected cases.

KEYWORDS: facelift procedure, parapharyngeal tumor

(2)

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Tab. I. This study included four retro-styloid (benign nerve sheath tumor) and six pre-styloid tumors (pleomorphic adenoma). Mean tumor dimensions were 4.1 x 4.2 x 3.8 cm, with the largest antero- posterior, medial-lateral and cranio-caudal dimensions being 5.2 x 6.1 x 6.2 cm, respectively. FNAC allowed a definitive diagnosis before surgery. A facelift procedure was applied to all cases. No patient needed conversion to conventional open resection and no patient required the use of an endoscopic device to guarantee safe resection for reasons of limited surgical view. Post-operative complications occurred in 4/10 patients: three developed tran- sient sensory changes in the auricle and one patient presented a temporary marginal mandibular facial nerve branch dysfunction, but spontaneously recovered within four months (Tab. II.). One patient developed X nerve palsy due to damage sustained during resection and is being followed up. In all the patients, the post- operative scars were invisible due to concealment by the auricle and hair. No recurrences were detected during a mean follow-up period of 16.6 months. Two representative cases are presented in Fig. 1. and Fig. 2.

DISCUSSION

Surgical removal is the best treatment for PPT; however, owing to the complex anatomy of the PPS, which is close to many vital or- gans such as the internal carotid artery, the internal jugular vein, the IX, X, XI and XII cranial nerves, and the sympathetic nerve, a range of surgical resection techniques has been applied to en- sure safety and clear visualization during surgery. These surgical resection techniques are classified as transcervical, transcervical- transparotid, transcervical-transmandibular, transoral, and tran- soral robotic surgery, and the optimal choice depends on accurate information on mass size and location, its relationship with the surrounding vessels and nerves, and its nature [1–5].

An accurate diagnosis is essential for planning the best surgical procedure to ensure safe and radical removal of PPS tumors. For this purpose, MRI and CT were performed and the lesions were detected in all cases. FNAC was also conducted in all cases.

It is reported that the facelift procedure using a retro-auricu- lar incision and positioning the cut close to the hairline to dis- guise the most visible part of the scar can improve the aesthetic Tab. I. Clinical characteristics (n = 10).

Age (years) 48.3 (28–67)

Sex male:female / 5:5

Mean size of tumor (cm) 4.1 × 4.2 × 3.8

Site of tumor Pre-styloid Retro-styloid

64

Pathology Schwannoma Pleomorphic adenoma

46

Follow up (months) 16.6 (4–72)

Tab. II. Surgical outcomes and complications (n = 10).

Operating time (min) 148 (82–201)

Bleeding (mL) 21 (15–46)

Drain out (days) 3.4 (3–5)

Surgical complications X

VII Auricle

11 3

Post-operative scar Noticeable Hidden or invisible

010

Recurrence

X: cranial nerve X palsy

VII; temporary marginal mandibular or facial nerve dysfunction 0 Auricle: transient sensory changes

in the auricle

(3)

Fig. 1. A 52-year-old woman with left PPS tumor. (A) Preoperative enhanced-computed tomography findings show a heterogeneously enhancing mass with mixed densities measuring about 4.6 x 4.6 cm in the PPS; (B) Preoperative T1-weighted MRI findings show a homogeneous mass in the PPS; (C) Preoperative T2-weighted MRI findings show a heterogeneous mass with mixed intensities in the PPS; (D) The skin incision for the facelift procedure was begun with a retro-auricular incision, positioning the cut close to the hairline; (E) Intraoperative view after elevation of the skin flap, broadly exposing the superficial muscular aponeurotic system; (F) Intraoperative view of the protruding mass from the PPS; (G) Postoperative view showing preoperative shaving of retro-auricular hair (arrow), continuous vacuum drainage (arrow), and wound closure with a stapler (arrow); (H) The clearly demarcated, hard and elastic specimen with a diameter of about 5.0 x 3.9 x 3.8 cm; (I) Histological section showing the tumor to be composed predominantly of spindle cells, many of which were large and stained darkly. A diagnosis of schwannoma was eventually made (HE, original magnification ×400);

(J) Postoperative scar at six months was invisible.

outcome [4–10]. In this study, we analyzed the feasibility, surgical outcomes and possible risks and complications encountered dur- ing the facelift procedure for patients with PPS tumors. Use of the facelift procedure for resecting PPS tumors allows identification and preservation of the facial nerve, the external and internal ca- rotid arteries, the internal jugular vein, cranial nerves IX, X, XI, and XII, and the sympathetic nerve. The PPS could be retracted to create sufficient working space to perform digital dissection of parotid deep lobe tumors by gently separating them from the ad- hesive fibrous surrounding tissues. Most parotid deep lobe tumors in the PPS can be removed using the facelift procedure, and it is

particularly effective for small tumors. However, other surgical modalities should be selected if a large mass, firmly-attached tu- mors, or cases of suspected malignancy are discovered.

In all cases, the postoperative scars were fully and satisfactorily concealed by the auricle and hair. This facelift procedure for be- nign PPS tumors was able to provide favorable results with respect to postoperative scarring.

The results of personal experience in the surgical management of PPS tumors confirm that careful preoperative shaving of

A

E

H I J

F G

B C D

(4)

retro-auricular hair, continuous vacuum drainage, wound closure with a stapler and appropriate dressing are mandatory to reduce surgical complications, aesthetic-functional damage and the risk of recurrence (Fig. 1.).

The facelift procedure for resecting benign PPS tumors thus pro- vides adequate visualization and working space and excellent cos- metic results in properly selected cases.

Fig. 2. A 68-year old woman with right PPS tumor. (A) Preoperative axial enhanced-computed tomography findings show a heterogeneously enhancing mass with mixed densities measuring about 3.1 x 3 cm in the PPS; (B) Preoperative coronal enhanced-computed tomography findings show a heterogeneously enhancing mass with mixed densities measuring about 3.1 x 3 cm in the PPS; (C) Preoperative T1-weighted MRI findings show a homogeneous mass in the PPS; (D) Preoperative T2-weighted MRI findings show a heterogeneous mass with mixed intensities in the PPS; (E) The skin incision for the facelift procedure was begun with a retro-auricular incision, positioning the cut close to the hairline; (F) Intraoperative view after elevation of the skin flap, broadly exposing the superficial muscular aponeurotic system. Intraoperative view of the mass protruding from the PPS; (G) The well-demarcated, rubbery specimen with a diameter of about 3.4 x 2.7 x 3 cm; (I) Histological section showing the tumor to be composed predominantly of round and spindle cells. Many of these cells were small and large and stained lightly. A diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma was made (HE, original magnification x 400); (J) Postoperative scar at 6 months was prominent, however, could be hidden by the auricle and hair.

H I

F

E

D

G

C

B

A

(5)

REFERENCES

1. Poletti A.M., Dubey S.P., Colombo G., Cugini G.: Surgical management of para- pharyngeal space tumors: The role of cervical and lateral skull base procedures.

Ear Nose Throat J., 2016; 95(12): E1-E6.

2. Bootz F., Greschus S., van Bremen T.: Diagnosis and treatment of parapharyngeal space tumors. HNO., 2016; 64(11): 815–821.

3. Ahmad F., Waqar-uddin, Khan M.Y., Khawar A., Bangush W. et al.: Management of parapharyngeal space tumours. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2006; 16: 7–10.

4. Derby B.M., Codner M.A.: Evidence-Based Medicine: Face Lift. Plast Reconstr Surg., 2017; 139(1): 151e-167e.

5. Liu H., Li Y., Dai X.: Modified face-lift procedure combined with a superficially an- terior and superior-based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap in total parotidectomy.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol., 2012; 113(5): 593–599.

6. Lee H.S., Kim D., Lee S.Y., Byeon H.K., Kim W.S. et al.: Robot-assisted versus endoscopic submandibular gland resection via retroauricular procedure: a pro- spective nonrandomized study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg., 2014; 52(2): 179–184.

7. Wan D., Dayan E., Rohrich R.J.: Safety and Adjuncts in Face Lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg., 2019; 144(3): 471e-484e.

8. Rivera T., Rodríguez M., Pulido N., García-Alcántara F., Sanz L.: Current indi- cations for the osteoplastic flap. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp., 2016; 67(1): 33–39.

9. Park J.O.: Facelift Approach for Resecting Benign Upper Neck Masses. World J Surg., 2017; 41(6): 1488–1493.

10. Park J.O., Kim S.Y., Chun B.J., Joo Y.H., Cho K.J. et al.: Endoscope-assisted face- lift thyroid surgery: an initial experience using a new endoscopic technique. Surg Endosc., 2015; 29(6): 1469–1475.

DOI:

Copyright:

Competing interests:

Corresponding author:

Cite this article as:

Word count: 1957 Tables: 2 Figures: 2 References: 10 10.5604/01.3001.0014.1614 Table of content: https://otolaryngologypl.com/issue/13767

Some right reserved: Polish Society of Otorhinolaryngologists Head and Neck Surgeons. Published by Index Copernicus Sp. z o.o.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The content of the journal „Polish Society of Otorhinolaryngologists Head and Neck Surgeons” is circulated on the basis of the Open Access which means free and limitless access to scientific data.

This material is available under the Creative Commons – Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

The full terms of this license are available on: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode

Dr Nobuo Ohta; Division of Otolaryngology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, 1-12-1, Fukumuro, Miyaginoku, Sendai 983-8512, Japan; Phone: +81 22 259 1221; E-mail: noohta@hosp.tohoku-mpu.ac.jp

Ohta N., Matsuura K., Osafune H., Suzuki T., Noguchi N., Hirabayashi R., Kitaya S., Kusano Y., Saito Y., Kawata R., Ikeda R., Ishida J., Shimada H., Murakami K., Murakami K., Nakamura Y., Wada K.: A Facelift Procedure for Resection of Benign Parapharyngeal Tumors; Otolaryngol Pol, 2021: 75 (3): 28-32

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Calculating the 5 aforementioned factors, we performed a successful non-invasive quantitative evaluation of the common femoral and iliac arteries from a CTA scan for the whole

Routine biochemical blood serum tests (with the exceptions of haemoglobin, creatinine, albumin and HbA1c in diabetic patients) and other preoperative static investigations have

[1] expands upon two previous studies [2, 3] evaluating the ability of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) ima- ging to visualize the coronary sinus (CS) and its branches

[r]

Wskazani uczniowi, gdy wykonają zadania, muszą niezwłocznie przesłać wyniki przez komunikator na e-dzienniku, lub mailem na adres:!. matematyka2LOpm@gmail.com skan

We have already seen how we can use the position vector r for a general point on the line, and then use the condition to write an equation for λ.. See Worked

(c) Calculate the number of members of the fitness club who attend neither the aerobics course (A) nor the yoga

Aktualne wytyczne Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [8] mówi¹, ¿e warunkiem uzyska- nia zgody pacjentki na leczenie, zabieg czy operacjê jest pewnoœæ, ¿e