ARCHIEF
_
;Tr '
SSC-202
SHIP
DEL OF THE MARINERCL
HIP "CALIFORNIA BEAR"
LI
UE HEADINGS IN R
This document has been approved
for public release and sale; its
distribution is unlimited:
SHIP STRUCTURE
COMMITTEE
NOVEMBER 1969
Lab1 v. Schee -s
Technische-. . .
SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE
November 1969
Dear Sir:
The Ship Structure Committee has sponsored a
series of studies relating bending moments and strains
on towing-tank models to those on actual ships. The
enclosed report presents towing-tank data on the
Cali-fbrnia Bear
for which full-scale data has beenprevi-ously obtained.
This report is being distributed to persons interested in the Ship Structure Committee's work.
Your comments would be appreciated. Sincerely,
C. P. Murp y
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Chairman, Ship Structure Committee
MEMBER AGENCIES: ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE TO:
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD SECRETARY
NAVAL SHIP SYSTEMS COMMAND SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE MILITARY SEA TRANSPORTATION SERVICE U.S. COAST GUARD HEADQUARTERS
MARITIME ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20591
SSC-202
Technical Report
'on
Project SR-165
"Bending Moment Determination"
to the
Ship Structure Committee .
MIDSHIP WAVE BENDING MOMENTS IN A MODEL OF THE MARINER-CLASS
- CARGO SHIP
CALIFORNIA BEAR
RUNNING AT OBLIQUE HEADINGS IN REGULAR WAVES
by
E. Numata and W. F. Yonkers Stevens Institute of Technology
Hoboken, New Jersey
under
- Department of the Navy
NAVSEC Contract N00024-67-C-5218
This
.document
has been approved for publicreiedseand
ite
distribution is unlimited. U. S. Coast Guard HeadquartersWashington, D. C.
-Vertical and lateral wave bending moments were measured at
the midship section of a 1/96-scale model of the C4-S-1A MARINER-class cargo ship CALIFORNIA BEAR.
The model was self propelled
through a ship speed-range of 10 to 22 knots at seven headings to
regular waves of lengths between 0.2 and 2.0 times the length
be-tween perpendiculars; moderate wave heights not exceeding 1/50 of
the model length were used Results 6re presented in charts of bending-moment-amplitude/wave-amplitude versus ship speed, with
wave length as the parameter
l'tlm ship loading conditions, rep-resentativeof actual westbound and eastbound trans-Pacific
voy-ages are covetsed.
APPENDI X
f-,
INTRODUCTIONF
-DESCRIPTION OF THE EXPERIMENT"
DISCUSSION . . .
-CONCLUOI,N:G.;.REMAR'KS . , .
.:ACKNOWLEDGEKtNTs.
The SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE is constituted to prosecute a research to
improve the hull structures of ships by an extension of knowledge pertaining to
design, materials and methods of fabrication.
RADM C. P. Murphy, USCG - Chairman Chief, Office of Merchant Marine Safety
U. S. Coast Guard Headquarters
Captain W. R. Riblett, USN Head, Ship Engineering Division Naval Ship Engineering Center
Captain T. J. Banvard, USN Maintenance and Repair Officer Military Sea Transportation Service
SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE
SHIP STRUCTURE SUBCOMMITTEE
The SHIP STRUCTURE SUBCOMMITTEE acts for the Ship Structure Committee
on technical matters by providing technical coordination for the determination
of goals and objectives of the program, and by evaluating and interpreting the
results in terms of ship structural design, construction and operation.
NAVAL SHIP ENGINEERING CENTER U. S. COAST GUARD
Mr. E. S. Dillon
Chief, Division of Ship Design Office of Ship Construction Maritime Administration Mr. D. B. Bannerman, Jr. Vice President - Technical American Bureau of Shipping
Mr. J. J. Nachtsheim - Chairman
Mr. J. B. O'Brien - Contract Administrator Mr. G. Sorkin - Member Mr. H. S. Sayre - Alternate Mr. I. Fioriti - Alternate MARITIME ADMINISTRATION Mr. F. Dashnaw - Member Mr. A. Maillar - Member Mr. R. Falls - Alternate Mr. W. G. Frederick - Alternate AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING
Mr. G. F. Casey - Member Mr. F. J. Crum - Member
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH
Mr. J. M. Crowley - Member Dr. W. G. Rauch - Alternate
MILITARY SEA TRANSPORTATION SERVICE
Mr. R. R. Askren - Member
Lt. J. G. T. E. Koster, USN - Member
iv
CDR C. R. Thompson, USCG - Member LCDR C. S. Loosemore, USCG - Member LCDR L. C. Melberg, USCG - Alternate CDR L. A. Colucciello, USCG - Alternate
NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER Mr. A. B. Stavovy - Alternate
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Mr. A. R. Lytle, Liaison Mr. R. W. Rumke, Liaison Mr. M. L. Sellers, Liaison
AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE Mr. J. R. LeCron, Liaison
BRITISH NAVY STAFF
Mr. H. E. Hogben, Liaison CDR D. Faulkner, RCNC, Liaison
WELDING RESEARCH COUNCIL
Mr. K. H. Koopman, Liaison Mr. C. Larson, Liaison
2.
'
.LIST OF FIGURES
Body Plan of CALIFORNIA
REAR-VertiCal and Lateral Bending Moment' Balance. 3. PrOfile-pf -CALIFORNIA BEAR
(Photdgra0),, and
Berldihg.:MOmentiBal-ande
in PositionAcross
ModelGut
:(Photograph) . . . .
. .
, .
- f
Weight Distribution 'Diagram (Displacement 16,840 Tns,
Drafts 23.70 ' Fwd, 25.55 ' Aft)
.
Weight Distribution Diagraffi (Displacement 13,990 Tans;
.
Drafts 19.25 ' Fwd, 22.55 ' Aft)
-Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25'
rwO,
Aft; 20 Knots) . . .. ... :
. .Vertical Wave Betiding Moments (Drafts: 19.25' 'Fwd, 22.55'
Aft; '20 Knots)". . .
. ...
". . : .
-.Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts 19.25' Fwd,,-.22.55!
Aft;. 20 Knotsr . . . " . . . .
Lateral 'Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwci_;,22,.S5
, Aft; 20 Knots) .. . .
..
10. ' Vertical 'Wave ^Bending .Moments (Drafts:. 23.70'. Tw4i-;;2,$,,5
'Aft.; 20 .Knots)
. . . .
Vertical Wave 'Bench twMoments (Drafts:. 23.7
Aft; . . . "
' 12, Lateral ::,Wave. Be-riding Moments (Drafts: 23.76'
rya,
25 55'Aft; 20 Knot)
. . ..
13. Lateral .Wave Bending Moments (Drafts':
'23.701-Aft; 20 Knots)
14, Vertical WaVe.Bending'MOMenfs -''Oraffs: 19.25'
Aft; 20 Knots)
... .
. . .....
.
Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts.: f9-.25' Fwd, 22L551
Aft; 20 Knots) . .
. .... .
. .
:
. .Vertical and Lateral- Wave Bending. moine'ili (Drafts : _23
Fwd, 25.55' Aft; 20- Knots)
17. Vertical and Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts:
23.7 ' _ Fwd, 25.55' 'Aft; 20 Knots) _13 12 12,_ 13
-vi PAGE 14 14 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 20 20
Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 20 Knots)
Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 23.70' Fwd, 25.55' Aft; 20 Knots)
APPENDIX FIGURES
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 180° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 180° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 150° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 150° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 120° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 120° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 900 Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 90° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 60° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 60° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 30° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 30° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 0° Heading)
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 0° Heading)
Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55'
Aft;. '
...
.20
Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 150° Heading). . . .
Lateral _Wave Bending Moments (Drafts.; Fwd, 22.55
Aft; 120° Heading)
-Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts:.19.25' Fwd, 22.55'
Aft; 120°- Heading)'. . .
' Lateral Wave Beni:hi-1g Moments (DraftS: .19.25' Fwd, 22.55'
Aft; 900 Heading) . . . .
lateral Wave Bending Moments (DraftS:' 1972
Aft;:'90°.Headin4), . .
.A-21. Lateral Wave .Bending Moments (Drafts: 19-.2 Aftl-- 606- Headi 6)- . . .
Lateral Wave Bending-: Moments., (Drafts: 19.25' TWd,
Aft; 60°.-.Heading) . .
Lateral Wave .Bending_ Moments (Drafts: 19.25! Fwd, 2255'
Aft; 30° Heading)- . . . -22
Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft; 30° Heading) . -.i: . -.- . . .
. ...
. _ . 22
_
Lateral Wave 'Bending _Moments (Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55'
Aft;- 00 %Headi ng): . '. . .
-23
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts: Aft:;1.180°..fleading).
..
Vertical Wave Bending Moments 23.70t..Fwd, 25.55'
Aft;"-180°-.Heading).':-. .
A-28. Vertical Wave BerldinT-Momerits.-(Drafts: 23.70' Fwd,
Aft;, 1500 .Headif10:
A-29._ Vertical- Wave Bending Moments_ (Drafts: 23.70!
'Aft; 150° -Heading)'._
- ,
Fw , 5.55'
Fwd., ,25..55':
Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts : 3.70" Fwd,'25.55!
Aft; 120°
Headfmr.-.'
_ . . . .' A-31. Vertical Wave Bending' Moments (Drafts:
23.70' Fwd, Aft;.120° Heading)... . .
- ... .
. . . . vii PAGE 20 . 21 22 23 23 23Vertical Wave Bending Moments (Drafts- '23'
Aft
90.0 .Heading):
. .... .
. . . -. .A-33. ,yerl:'Wave Ben'ding Moiments (Drafts: .23.,7-0!-',Tyd',25;5
Aff, 600 Heiding): .
. . .. ....
:
. .
-%Vertical - WiVe:Bendih§ .komens (Drafts
23 7O'Fqd, 25:55)
:"-Aft;' 60° Heading).
. . . .Veftfcal
ertiC41.-WaveBeiidingM6Menis-Cbrafts::237
't;-30°'--Headiii-gf.:?-''
_ _,. _
. ,....
.647tT.-17,'Wave Bending Moments (D:rafft,:. 2,
-..7,ervOieadihy .-.:::-..---'
.. . 1- -...,ri..,.J,...-.:-.',,
-.
:ii-'..., , ...,:4,,.::.,,,,etfearWaVe-BendingrMoMent's (Drafts: 23.,
, ,W4---k..':'Aft, 0° Heading)
Lateral Wave Bending7Moments (Drafts: 23.70',.E,44,
'-'Aft;'18.0° Heading)'.,-.
. .. ... .
-.- Lateral Wave Bending, Moments (Drafts: 23.70,', FWelc?:25,
'
Aft; 150°-Heading)
. .. ... .
. .-,
A741.
Lateral Wave Bending 'Moments (Drafts:
23.70'.Fw0;--Aft; 120°- HeaaingT.
....
. . ..
,
_ .Lateral Wave Bending Moments (Drafts;
Aft90°,
Heading)-Laterai-WaVe Bending Moments (Drafts.: 0:7pe,_
Aft; 60°. Heading'),;
. . . .Lateral : Waiei.pendihg:M0ents
ft, 30° H0846,4).-
. .,
.LaterarNave.Bending=ftments (Drafts : 23,1
0° Heading)
'INTRODUCTION
In 1960 the Ship Structure Committee authorized Davidson Laboratory to initiate a research program entitled "Bending Moment Determination," using ship-model tests
to investigate hull bending moments in regular and irregular waves.
The initial phase of this program, Project SR-157, covered investigations of trends of midship bending moment as a function of wave steepness in models of
a MARINER-class cargo ship with variations in freeboard and weight distribution,
a destroyer, and (3) a tanker. Dalzelli'2 concluded that, within practical
operational and design limits, no dramatic upper limit of wave bending moments at
amidships is to be expected as the ratio of wave height to wave length increases to
a value of about 1:9.
Since this conclusion was limited to midship bending moments, and it was known
that maximum moments under certain circumstances could occur elsewhere, the next
phase of the study, Project SR-165, examined the longitudinal distribution of
bend-ing moments in a MARINER-class cargo-ship model in regular waves of extreme steepness.
Maniar2'4 concluded that, within practical operational limits of speed for the MARINER,
maximum wave bending moments would occur in the region from amidships to 0.125L aft
of amidships. Thus the practice of concentrating on midship bending moments both in
design studies and in full-scale measurements appears to be justified.
Another part of the investigation involved the testing of the MARINER model in
high irregular waves to obtain time history records of wave bending moment and wave
elevation. Wave and bending moment energy-spectra were computed and used to derive
equivalent regular-wave bending-moment "response operators" which were shown to be in reasonable agreement with response results obtained from model tests in regular waves.
Such favorable agreement inspires confidence in the alternate procedure of
using a "response operator" from tests in regular waves to predict the energy spectrum
of bending-moment response of either a ship model in a known wave-spectrum or a ship
in a real seaway the energy spectrum of which can be determined. Before taking this
latter step, however, it is necessary to demonstrate satisfactory correlation
be-tween model and ship bending-moment responses.
Over a period of years, full-scale statistical data on midship bending-moment responses have beenicollected by the Teledyne Materials Research Company (under Project SR-153), on several vessels including (1) the MARINER-class, cargo ship
CALIFORNIA BEAR operated by the Pacific Far East Line in trans-Pacific service
between San Francisco and Yokohama and (2) the cargo ship 'WOLVERINE STATE operating
on the United States-Northern Europe route in the North Atlantic Ocean. Davidson
Laboratory proposed the conduct of scale-model tests of these vessels at various
speeds and headings in regular waves, to obtain bending-moment response operators.
' Webb Institute of Naval Architecture, in a parallel effort, proposed an analysis
of statistical data for the ships and the prediction of ship bending-moment
statistics from Davidson Laboratory's model-test results. The tests of the
WOLVERINE STATE model have been reported in Reference 5.
This report describes the tests of the CALIFORNIA BEAR model at Davidson Lab-oratory, under Project SR-165, and presents the wave-bending-moment results which have been used by Webb Institute in their model-ship correlation program under Project SR-177.
Two ship loading conditions were used in this experiment. Both were taken
from the reported cargo and tankage distributions for actual trans-Pacific voyages
of the CALIFORNIA BEAR, on which the Teledyne Research Corporation had installed instruments to collect strain data on ship bending moments.
-2-DESCRIPTION OF THE EXPERIMENT
Model
The tests were conducted on a 65-inch (1/96-scale) fiberglass model of a
stand-ard MARINER-class cargo vessel. This model was originally built for the tests
reported in Reference 3. Figure 1 shows the body plan. The model was cut at a
point corresponding to 260 feet aft of the ship's fore perpendicular. The two halves
of the model were connected by the standard Davidson Laboratory two-component
bend-ing-moment balance, illustrated in Fig. 2. This balance consists of two pedestals
with an integral flexure beam of cruciform cross-section milled from a single block
of aluminum alloy. The componental deflections of the beam in its vertical and
lateral planes of symmetry are mechanically amplified by linkages and sensed by
linear variable differential transformers. Figure 3 is a photograph of the model
in profile and a photograph of the setup of the bending-moment balance across the
model cut. The midships cut was sealed with a thin sheet of rubber fixed to the
hull with vinyl-plastic electrical tape.
An electric propulsion motor was installed to turn a stock four-bladed
pro-peller of approximately the desired scale diameter. The rudder was built to scale
and was operated by a servomotor which formed part of an automatically controlled steering system.
Loading Conditions
Pacific Far East Line made available complete records of cargo and tankage distributions for nine voyages covering two years of instrumented operation between
January 1966 and December 1967.
Two representative loading conditions were used for ballasting the model. For the first condition, representing a full load of cargo typical of a westbound voyage (San Francisco to Yokohama) of the CALIFORNIA BEAR, the loading condition
chosen was that of westbound voyage number 33 of October 1967. The mean draft
on this voyage was nearly identical to the average of the mean drafts of nine
westbound voyages, numbers 25 through 33. Figure 4 is a weight distribution diagram
for westbound voyage 33, and shows a displacement of 16,840 tons at a mean draft, at mid-voyage, of 24.6 feet with a trim of 1.8 feet by the stern.
The second condition was meant to represent a low-density, dry-cargo loading
typical of an eastbound voyage from Yokohama to San Francisco. The average of the
displacements of the nine sample eastbound voyages was 12,000 tons. This value
was too low to be simulated on the model. To facilitate proper ballasting of
the model, the cargo-loading of eastbound voyage 25 of March 1966 was chosen. Figure 5 is the weight distribution diagram for this voyage and shows a displace-ment of 13,900 tons at a mean draft, at mid-voyage, of 20.9 feet with a trim of 3.29 feet by the stern.
Reported cargo and tankage distributions were used to simulate each loading
condition on model scale. Each half of the model was ballasted to the desired
scaled values of weight, LCG, and pitch gyradius. Gyradius was checked by
sus-pending each model-half from a knife edge, oscillating it as a compound pendulum,
and measuring its natural period. The gyradius was calculated from this period
and the distance from the knife-edge to the CG. Tare weights were substituted for
the bending-moment balance to permit separate ballasting of the model-halves. The vertical center of gravity of each half was adjusted to a common value based
-Profile of CALIFORNIA BEAR
Fig. 5. Weight Distribution Diagram Displacement: 13,900 Tons, Drafts: 19.25' 'Fwd, 22.55' Aft Loaded Ship L Light Ship. 71_ 500 A P1
Fig1:11:3.;'.Bending Moment Balance in
Position Across Model
, 4.. Weight Distribution Diagram Displacement: 16,840 . Tons -Drafts: 23.70' Fwd, '25.55'1-Aft , ' 200 Tans Foot 760 Ao 30 f .P. 0 10
On the reported load ing.
.Ballast was adjusted,,)aterally to obtain the scaled:-
.value of tkenat'uralrolling period oft he complete model
, . . .,
-
.- :The ,'ship
:characteristics-for the ,iwo ' load
.- .
conditions 6re:tabulated be low. 1
DisplaCernent,,..long tons
Draft
-- Fore ,pgrpendicOlar, ft
-Aft' Perpendicular,'-ft
Mean, ft
LOG .aft.,tf-amidshlP, ft
,
Pitch radius of 'gYrai ion, ft
NatUra Irolling period, sec
Forebody
b iSplacement, ,long tons,
'.CG forward tf
0";
Pitch gyradiU
ft
V CG above baseline, ft
Afterbody
D isplacement,.:Jong
LOG aft_of amidships,
Pi tch. gyred i
ft
, 7VCG.:6,13oVe baseline, ft
6,129
- 8,-079105.0
,98.2
66.5
-24:0
:: 27.O -,r--, ,- ----:. -',..,-7,771
8,767
107.2--
_ r-170.37,, -71.4
S f,".:-._,'
27.0
'0 `,.,C'r,7 , ,LP44ULEE:.
-11:=,TABLE OF SHIP CHARACTERISTICS
Length Between Perpendiculars.., ft.
.528.0
Eastbound
13,900
' I
-. 14-.4 Westbound-:16,840
23.70
25.5 .524.62
8.8
123.6
16.7The e)cperimerit=iWas. CorlduCied
Labora'tory!s Tank 2 (75' x' 75! x 4,5").
This facility ihbliYijet a Wiavernaker:a long
one 75-foot- side of the tank, a wave
ab-sorber alOhb' the opposite side,and a:thbVab le bridge "spanhir6 the 'tank.' the...bridge
supports a' monorail-carriage - dr iven by 6'
servo-controlled -Motor.'
". -W.
Suspended from the carriage is
a six-degree-of-freedom -,rflot ions apparatus which
is servo-dr iYen,to .follow a. self-propelled,
automatically steered model in waves'.
A 'Vertical heave. rod 'rides in. bear ings on the apparatus' and is attached to the
model through a threedegree-of=freeddm gimbal.
Power and ContrOl, wieis, for the
rudder and propulsion mdfOrs
,as well as signal cab les from the,:,bending-moment
.
ba 1 ante
6 re led upward to the
carriage and thence to a recording and control station
at -tankside.
The moment-balance output signals were fed through
a Sanborn 350-1100
Series carrier amplifier system, and then through
Krohn-Hite Model. 35 low-pass act ive
filters to minimize high-frequency noise in the
records..
The signals were then
dis-played by a v is i corder Model 1108
as time histories on osci 1 lograph chart Paper.
-- r
,ine heights of -a 1 1
regular waves were calibrated before model
tests, by?
traversing the "reading" section.. of carriage travel with
a resistance-type wave
probe at the model location./.'IThg,:resulting records, of 'WaveferevatiOn time history
-6-were reduced to obtain the average wave height for each wave length at each bridge
heading. During each test of the model, the wavemaker speed-control was adjusted
to maintain the wave period used during the wave calibrations. This procedure was
preferred to the measuring of the wave elevation during each model run, because it is known that model-generated waves can influence wave-probe readings.
Test Procedure
The bridge was positioned for model headings of 180 degrees (head seas),
150 degrees, 120 degrees, 60 degrees, 30 degrees, and zero degrees. At each
head-ing angle, at least eight wave lengths were tested and a minimum of three speeds
in the range of 10-22 knots, full scale. A nominal wave height of 1/50 of the
model length was used for all waves except the relatively short ones, for which a
reduced height was substituted. The mean speed of the model was averaged over a
distance of about four model lengths (20 feet).
The bending moment balance was calibrated periodically by applying known moments to the model while it was afloat.
Data Reduction and Presentation
Time histories of vertical and lateral bending moments were reduced to obtain
the average range of moment during the 20-foot interval of model travel. The
phase between the two moments was also determined.
The moment data are presented in dimensional form (bending-moment-amplitude/ wave-amplitude in ft-tons/ft) as trends versus ship speed: for all wave-length/
ship-length ratios at a given heading angle; separate chart S are presented for
vertical and lateral moments. Figures A-1 through A-25 of the Appendix 'contain
the results for the 20,9-ft mean draft condition; Figures A-.26 through A-45 present
the results at 24.6-ft 'mean draft. The reported bending moments are due Solely to
wave-induced loads and are measured with respect: to a still-water datum.
Still-water hogging moments were 86,000 ft-tons at '20.9-ft mean draft and 70,000 ft-tons
at 24.6-ft mean draft; these are calculated values.
Phase is presented as the lag of lateral moment behind vertical moment for a
given wave-length/ship-length ratio. The, phase results are consistent with a
headinl-angle convention of representing head seas by 180 degrees and following seas
by' zero degrees. At intermediate heading angles, the waves approach the port 'bow
(150 degrees, 120 degrees), the port beam (90 degrees), or the port quarter (60
degrees, 30 degrees). Each phase angle is the lag of starboard lateral moment
behind hogging vertical moment, with a starboard lateral moment corresponding to
a hull-deflection curve which. is concave to starboard. The phase results are
presented' tabular form
in
Tables A-1 and A-Z of the Appendix; a single phase value iS given fOr'each combination of heading angle and wave-length/ship-lengthratio.
' DISCUSSION
The object of this'investigation was to obtain wave-bending-moment response
-7-prediction-and-correlation project. The moment curves and phase results in the
Appendix are convenient and practicable for the purpose. Sample response-curves
for the average Pacific crossing-speed of 20 knots have been constructed from the charts in the Appendix and are shown in Figs. 6-13.
The double peaks in some of the vertical-moment curves, Figs. 6, 7, 10, and
11, have been documented by investigators at the St. Albans Tank in England (most
recently by Murdey ), but only for head seas. Murdey, with the help of
analy-tical predictions of the inertial and hydrodynamic components of veranaly-tical moment,
explains why the peaks occur. He shows that each component contributes one peak
to the total vertical moment. Fukuda,7 using an analytical prediction technique,
has found double peaks in vertical-moment response curves for other heading
angles.
A typical set of vertical-moment response curves, Figs. 6 and 7 for example, shows a consistent tendency for the moment peaks to shift to shorter wave lengths
as the heading angle changes from 0 or 180 degrees to 90 degrees. In 180-deg
head seas the peak moment occurs in a wave length about equal to the ship length. Thus it may be visualized that maximum sagging moment occurs when the trough of
such a wave is at amidships with wave crests near each perpendicular. To obtain
a similar wave-ship geometry, at a 120-deg heading, the wave length should be
about equal to the effective ship length (i.e. , L cos pw) where L is ship length
and
pw is heading angle.
Figures 14-17 show trends of wave bending moments versus wave length/L cosilw
for the various heading angles at a ship speed of 20 knots. This method of
plotting shows that the moment peaks generally occur at a constant value of wave length / L cos pw of about 0.9.
Figures 18 and 19 show cross-plots of moments versus heading angle at a value of wave length / L cos pw of 0.9; with certain exceptions, noted by
asterisks, these are curves of peak values. Data were taken at too few headings
to permit definition of the angles at which maximum moments occur. However, the
general headings at which highest values occur are head seas for vertical moment
and bow seas (about 130 degrees) for lateral moment. Both moments exhibit
secondary peaks in quartering seas (about 50 degrees). These trends are in
general agreement with analytical predictions for a ship of similar fineness, by Fukuda.7
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The primary objective of this experimental model investigation was to obtain wave-bending-moment data and to reduce them to a form usable by Webb Institute
for correlation with full-scale measurements. This has been accomplished and the
general trends of the results appear reasonable when compared with published data. Analysis of the results shows that peak moments tend to
occur--At a constant value of wave length/effective ship length, and
In head seas for vertical moment and in bow seas for lateral moment.
In view of the self-sufficient nature of these results, it is recommended
that no further model testing be conducted in connection with the CALIFORNIA BEAR project.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank two persons who made significant contributions
to this investigation: Mr. V. J. Bahorich, Superintending Engineer, Pacific
Far East Line, for furnishing an extensive amount of information on the loading statistics of the CALIFORNIA BEAR; and Mr. M. J. Chiocco, for conducting the model investigation of the westbound loading condition.
'Vertical Plomeist' AMPI I iude
Sove Amp I tude "."
10.0007 rr.'n 00 lieed ind = 0 , 5.000 . 5 2.0Wave 0. Length Ship Length Z
Vertical Whe pending.-Moments
prafts...;,..; 19.25' Fwd, -Aft Speed:
20 Knots
'Vert loll' riMiehi-!A'MP. fi tudre.
Wave: 0.5 . . ' TS' Ship Length :.-- ' =
Fig . 7. Vertical Wave Bendin4.:Mortient...
Drafts 19 25' Fwd,'-22 55' Aft- Speed
Lateral Moment Amplitude liave.Amolitude 5,000
-Nom
i3O00Lateral 'HOmeni AMOiituda
- Wave Amplitude., Ft-Tons -Ft Ft-Tons Ft -30 Reading 0! Heading 5 1.0 1.5 2:0 Sh1p Length
Fig.. 8. Lateral Wave Bending Moments .
.Drafts : 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' ,Aft Speed: 20 Knots
no° Heading:,
150! Heading
Wave Bending Moments
Drafts : Fwd, 22.55' Aft Speed:
:riot)
Vert tail MomentAMPlitUde Amplitude:Jr Ft-Tons Ft Vertical Momeni-Amelltude
"
Amplitude.: -1.0 Wave , Ship Length."c131-;if '"<"
'.Wive .Bendfqg Som`rerits: .
firiftS:
58!".Aft., Speed:'
20 Knots
ding. ..-.,1800 Heading :I50°.lineding . i.0 Lnqth-ShipLength--
sNertidal WaverBendin6' .Moments
Drafts
23 70' Fwd, 25:55'. Aft ::,Sfreed:
Lateral Moment 'Antal tude 'Wave Amplitude 5;000 Ft-Toni' Ft Ft _Toni:. 60'2" Heading _ 1500. Heidin
-.lie
Head ing. Fig.
13.
_Lateral Wave Bending MpmeRtsD-Tftrs:.'2J.16'
.Fwd, 25.55';Aft Speed: Knots"..
0° Head in
ad ing
Wave Length,it; Ship Length
Fig. 12. Lateral Wave Bending Mothents,,..:
Drafts : 23.70' Fwd, 25..551:Aft, SP-e0:
Wive Lek-U. Ship Length cos is
' HEADING
13!
0.5
Wes4 Lenetn
Ship Length cos ow
Drafts: 19.25.,FueS 22.55.- Aft SPoed: 20 knots HEADING CI.30° 1.5 1 2.0
, Fig. 15. ,La.teral. Wave Bending- Moments
Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 2:551Aft
:Speed:-, 20 KnOtt, 'Lateral: -tiow_eitiv_pn Wave Areplittele .Lt roris ' t 8.0 6,0-00 4.000 '6,000 4,00 2.000
8,000 6,000- 4,000-2,000r La'teral MoaeniAmolitude' Wave Amplitude 6.060 ' 4,0 J13-6,000 8,000 2,000 , NeriiCal,AOMeni Amplitude Wav.o.Amplitude
Fig-16,.
Vertical-
and Lateral Wave'Bending_MOifieritt Drafts: Fwd,
25.55: Aft . Speed:, 20 .Knots
Ft-Tons Lateral Moment-AnialitUde. Wave Amplitude, COO j54T4 Wave ''Lenciih" ViRTI-GAL. Ship Leng.th,cos,u.' -LATERAL 0 ,
Vertical 'moment Amislitude.
- Wave:Amplitude-
:-Ft-Tons
. 2,000:
Fig. 17. Vertical and Lateral. Wave Bending Moment t Draft: 23.-7_0' 'Fwd;,
25.55' Aft Speed: 20 Knots.'
HEADING '0 180° .13 Ise fie -` 2.0
Moment Amp1 tude
-Wave. AmplItinio.:
5,..cto0 Tt =Toni
Wave Length 0.9
Ship Length cos law
.
10,000 -
-LATLRAL' BENDINGI'MOMENT
VEAT I "CALBENDING'KOME.NT
*
150
Fig. 19... Wave .Bending'Moments,
Drafts: 23.70L-Fw0;,25.55!. _
20 Knot
180
Fig.1
-Wave Bending Moments Drafts: ,Fwd,,22.55' Aft Speed: 20 KnotsMoment AmplIttiie Wave Amplitude...
15,000 Tt
.1.
VERTICAL BEND 1 gG MOMENT
- 'LATERAL BENDING MOMENT
-15-REFERENCES
-I. DALZELL, J. F., An Investigation of Midship Bending Moments Experienced in
Extreme Regular Waves by Models of the MARINER Type Ship and Three Variants.
Ship Structure Committee, Serial
SSC-I55,
January 1964.DALZELL, J. F., An Investigation of Midship Bending Moments Experienced in
Extreme Regular Waves by Models :of a Tanker and a Destroyer. Ship Structure
Committee, Serial SSC-156, February 1964.
MANIAR, N. M., Investigation of Bending Moments Within the Midship Half Length
of a MARINER Model in Extreme Waves. Ship Structure Committee, Serial SSC-163,
June 1964.
MANIAR, N. M. and NUMATA, E., "Bending Moment Distribution in a Mariner Cargo Ship Model in Regular and Irregular Waves of Extreme Steepness," Davidson
Laboratory Report 1094, Stevens Institute of Technology, March 1968.
CHIOCCO, M. J. and NUMATA, E., "Midship Wave Bending Moments in a Model of the Cargo Ship WOLVERINE STATE Running at Oblique Headings in Regular Waves,"
Davidson Laboratory Report 1299, Stevens Institute of Technology, October 1968.
MURDEY, D. C., "On the Double Peaks in Wave Bending Moment Response Curves,"
Trans., Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 1968.
FUKUDA, JUN-ICHI, "Computer Program Results for Response Operators of Wave
Bending Moment in Regular Oblique Waves." Reprint from Memoirs of the Faculty
of Engineering, Kyushu University, Vol. XXVI, No. 2 (contribution to 3d
_Wavi,_Lendth Snip' Length
020
0.30 ,0.40 -v_ ,0.60 01.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.251
:.50 -1.45 2.00. .7 600 200 -140 - 175 -175 80 160.' .150 -. . .3-35146
In) 135 80 155 -180 90 '175, 190 165 ' .205 -65 190. 226 140-Lateral moment after vertical moment.
--Phases constant with speed from,10,to 20 knots)"
150 145 145 4o 200 145 200. 120 150
.030'
0.'50 0.60' 1.'10 1.29 -1.90 -1.79 2'. 60 .;TABLE A.'
pmASE-ANGLESDrafts:
23;.,40, FW-d.';,:,25.:.'55' Aft189
200.
4:;1,atera 1 moment after vertical moment,
.13h a'ies . -cons tant with .speed: 'from .1,0 to20knots.,
-Head ings '90° 1.49 )40. 135, 135.-140 149 145 ,
Vertical heventhealline.
- Wave Ampl
'2t-tans '
15.000
5.000
Vert tealN;Iimm;ivA..0 I iiude'
Wan,. ft" ,1;.-4Ta Ft. Speed, Anais. 5 itz L - Is I -Speed. 141-ots
Fig: A'41% -Vertical Wave Bending Moments Vertical Wave Bending Moments
Drafts: 19.25' Fwd 22'85!,,Aft-' 180° .,, Drafts.; 9.25' Fwd, 22..55' Aft 180°
Heading ' -' Heading, = _ 0.50 0.40 Wave th Ship Length C BO C.70 -0,0 Aio i tude -4 'Wave:Amplitude 15.000 0.40 10' . Length .Ship Length . 'Ship-Length 1.00 0.50 %SO ,,,121pme Ship Lengtn 20 :\
Speed, Wren Speed. Snots,
AL3:::-)YgtiCal Wa4 Bending Moments .F.1".g,._A7.4r.- YeetiOal Wave Bending_Moments
Drafts:, 19451-:-FWd, 22.55! Aft 150°:' : Drafi's-,:_19:Wryd,, 24551.Aft 150°
_
-Vert 1 cal Moment Aoof I tude
Move, Amol.1 tudo :S.A.IpiLpngth
;
.. _
tient I te1,41cenent 'Aelo I I tude
WeeeAntplI tune
to.ixisT
'Vert 1.1- &sent' Amp I I thee Worrre 'kw I I t , . 0601.Di ; 777-. , 0 S Feed,- Knot.. Speed,. Knots 5;00.0 is= sed..:;K4e; ,0.60 0.90 1.00
Fig . ,Vetica1Wael.:5endin4-,2MOmehts
Fig A6
Verti cal Wave Bening 'Moments". Drafts: 19'. 25 -FW:d; Drafts: =19.25V--.-Fwd, 22.55 Aft 1200
Heading Head
ing-vert Ica I-Moment Amp) I tudo
--Wave Amp I Ituda
-;aye Lenot4 ' Ship Length 0.40 1.50 '0.20 - _ ' --- '
-Fig . : Vertical _ Momints' Fig
A-
:.Vertjcal:;WaveyBending Moments_ Drafts 19 25' Fwd, ,22:551-Af,t-900 : Drafts : 19.25! .--FWd 2255' Aft 90°.
'Vertical Moment Analitede
.121JtV96
ooá
10.000
0.30
vavtraet moment Analltvaa --- Wave Amplituass ic --5ined. Knots , , 0.90 1.10 s040 -1.00 Vertlialleinant amelltuar WeveAteptitede 15400, -.77.3.t IC , ;715 -...
Speed ,-Knots ' : Speed. Knots
% ,,c4.:-.
Fig. A7,9....
Vertical Wave B000191Moiridhts-Fig. A-10.,...,
Vertical Wave Bending MomentsDrafts: 19.26): FWd,.22-.551 Mt.
609 .::-..."
Draftt.:14:5:: fwd, 22,65'Aft
60°-Heading, -..,-' - --t, Heading'. . ., ' ifertIcel:Mdment AnsIltuda, Ft-Tans 15000
7--. Ft 7154W61. 0;80 - 'Fig,
A-11. -Vertvcal.Wave,-.Bendlngl4Omentt Vertical Wave Bending Moments Drafts 19.25',f-Wd22,55-j:Aft 309 Fwd, - 22.55' Aft 309HeadiDg.. 140qflilei 0:50 0.60 0.70 1.00 1.50 's1RT; 20 '5 10
Wave Ampl 1 tude.
15.009 _Ltko_ns
1.et erel -Women t Amp 1 It ode
---Weve'Ampiltude 000 fIL-1:1L-"' . Ft, -3.000 . -3,000 0.. 10 15 Spend, Knots 15
,fl
0 /21. F1L4' n ci Cu. A . 10 20 20WøneL.ngth. ' _ Vert 1 ta Ampl 1 tude
Shl p 'Length Amp! I t ode
Wave Length' 911 p Length' 0.70, 0.80 1.25 0.40 0.50 1.75 0.60 0.90 100
Fig. A-15:. Lateral Wave Bending Moments Drafts:- 19.25'.Fwd,:22.55' Aft 1509,,,,
Heading,
15,000Ft-TonsFt,
.5.000
,
Fig. Vertical .Wave Bending MoMents Fig, A-14. Ve'rtical Wave Bending -Moments
Drafts .: Fwd, 22.55' Aft 0°- Drafts: 19.25'. Fwd, 22.55' Aft 0!'
Heading Heading 3.600a'J'aa 0,90 -10 .20 300_ 0.80 0.60 1.25 10 2 0.80 0.70 u) -1 0 - 2.00 ' 15 Spend, idiots 1, 15 20 ,111 1 p Length - 1
-Fig. A,16.,0..dterai Wave Bending Moments_
_
Drafts: 19,25' Fwd,-22.55' Aft 150?
- Heading
}agora/ Moment Amyl 1 tude Seen Length
Wave Amp 1 1 tude ShIp;Langth
0.70
1:50
.:Lite.e I1400rent- Ae,i !tide
-0 0 Arep.I I:t utt
5. tc.; --20 ' Ship Length - 20 20 46.0-Length Ship.Length
o050
0.40 0.80Fig. -Lateral WaVe.'Beriding -Moments Fig.: :A=1:8; ILateral -Wave- Beng Moments
Drafts:-19-.251. -Fwd, Aft 1200 Drafts:-19.:25' Fwd, 22-.55'- Aft 1200
Headingi,! - - Heading
Fig. -A=19;
Lateral:WaVeIgenting:;MoMents
Fi:g.A-26.
-Lateral, Wave Bending MomentsDrafts- 19':25,'2".-FWid; :Aft. 90°- Draftt: 19.25' Fwa,,22..55',. Aft 90°
Headingc- Heading
lateral Moment Anelltude Wave Amplitude
5.000
io
lateral Moment Amplitude Way* Amplitude it Sewed, Knots 15 Speed,, 5h;S, 20 Wave L.vvth Ship Length 0.30 0.20 M.013LIMSh Ship Length
Fig. A-23. Lateral Wave Bending Moments Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft 300
Heading
-23-}stem] Mommit Amplitude Wave Amplitude
-5.000
lateral Moment amplitude Wave Amplitude 5,000NM= 0.90 o 5,000 2.0 Wave Length Ship Length 0.70 1.00 Speed, Knots
Fig. A-21. Lateral Wave Bending Moments Fig. A-22. Lateral Wave Bending Moments
Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft 60° Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft 60°
Heading Heading
11121-1d5lEst
Ship Length
0.60
2.00
Fig. A-24. Lateral Wave Bending Moments Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55' Aft 30° Heading 10 IS Speed,'Itnets 15 20 10 15 20
34tOra I lletret-ei Andiltude-blare Amplitude_ 4,000 0.50 0.70 0.80 0A 0.90 so o oo ot
Ira
or,- I 00 - 15 k..12Vert ic1 Komerrtkoplitude lieve-koplitude_
,
0.80.
1.25
10 15 20
Fig. A-27. Veriial''.2161aCie-,Bending
Moments Drafts:- 23;70LFwd, 26:55' Aft 1800 Heading- ' ' 1.10 1.25 1.50, 1.75-2.00 10,000 10 s7d Knot
Fig. A-25.,. Lateral WiVeiBending Moments Fig. A-26. Vertical Wave Bending Moments
- .-lia: !r . r
!,-Drafts: 19.25' Fwd, 22.55 Aft 0° Drafts: 23.70' Fwd, 25.55' Aft 180°
Heading Heading
Speed, Knots
Fig"::1A-128.'Vertical Wave Bending
Moments Drafts: 23 70' Fwd, 25.55' Aft 1500 Heading 1.00 0.60 1.50 I-.75 -5.000 - _ 20 5;000 o I. n 0 0.40 ;!. fons Length -Ship Lgngth
-.Vertical Aament-Amplitude Wave 'collude
Ilertical We/Mirk Amplitude
Wave Amplitude is Ft.,..7t&ns 15.000 10,000 5:000 10 10.000 4 _ 3.70.. SpeZd.'1(mstc
ji Fig. A-29.- Vertical Wave- Bending
';Moments Drafts : 23.70! ;Fwd;;`25.55.',. ; Aft 1500 Heading AMva.Length 'ShipLength Wave Leugih , Ship Length 1.1C ! :
;-Fig. A-31. Vertical _Wave Bending
! Moments Drafts.: 23.70' Fwd,25.55'. ; Aft 120° Heading - .---;'.);.--,---:, -_ 500
Fig. VerticaL Wave Bending
Moments ,Drafts:.23.70' Fwd, 25.55' Aft 120°- Heading - Vertical.htcmnt Amplitude. - Wave Maplltude 2.000 2.000. 1Lits -Wcie Length :Ship Length '
Fig. A-32. `.-Vertical Wave Belding Moments Drafts: _23.70'. Fwd, 25.55' Aft 90° Heading'. -' 7:2-5 wove Length Ship Length 2.00 c . 0 2.42 Tab i 75 75 20 Spc07 Knott ' 5.000 .25 2,000 1.50 2,000
Vertical velment. Pap 1 itude Wane M,plltce EC+7 _ Wave Length Ship Length
5.-
I . Spied. Knott {7'eal Waver Ben`ding,
MoMents--.DraftS':
Aft 660::.14sidii-ig
, -0.50 Wave Largth Ship Length0.70-
-26-Fig
A-34.Vertical 'Wave Bending
Moments Drafts:
-.23.70' Frid,-, 26.55'
Aft 60° Heading.
-. , Kart iotl...vh.caren,mpti
15 Oct Sh.1 p. length
Fig.
A-35.!:.Vertical Wave Bei-idt_rig;:. r
,Vertitil Wave Bending
.Moments Draftt,:-:-.23i.3
OnleiTtS7Dfafts: 23.;7o' Fwd, 25.
55"-Aft 30?,-,H4ittri6'.
- .Heading;ed:- Knots:
1.75
-:._
5 '.000
.
, verif eat *914weie
j .- Wave Mali twigs
-sum Ft- -imoo 5,000 - Ft s 2;000 ' 15 qL60 0.50 Soentii, Knots
Fig.
A=37...Veetical Wave Bending Moments
Fig.
A-3 ..,..1-Vertical:Aave Bending Moments
Drafts :
23.70'-_Fwd, 25.~.551..:Aft.-,0°- -':-...-; ":DraftS: 23:i7dVh4-4;
2-5'.(:5-5',,Aft: o:--.Heading -
'
--.:.-
'
" = 2. .::' - . :Heading '- '''--
-
''' -"' '
.r.!''
,
'1'.
Speed,. Knots
Fig:
A=39. ,l_ateral Wave Berid_ing,,MomentsDrafts:
2.70'
Fwd,Aft i80°
Heading
Winie Length' Ship Length'
1.75
' sprd. 41`AP1
Fig. A-40-.
Lateral.,
Wave-Bending .11o,ments Drafts: '23.701.-Fwd
25.55'-Aft
150°
Headiii4
, 0,90 1.00 .1.25 `' 1.50 1.10 .00000
7.50 - 0 AO .°°!?n- Ship Length 1L 1:50-tairal.lioment Ampl i ,Letera 1 Mcmenthot 1Mule
-Mai-met. Iftado
Fig:. A4.1:-.'Latei!alx",:voVel-eild:rikg',_
Moments Drafts
237O'
25.-..55!)-Aft- 120°'.1-.1eading 15 Soe'sel. Knott W.V. Length . Selp-Length Later*1 Wave...Bend:trig
Moments:--briFfit:,'23.17wl'Fild; 2555'
-Aft- 60°-,Tleading
--- -al nereist:Amplis-de - Psnol toile 2,0005' -- 1.75 :25 k:,: 41,_ 50 0 0:70 - 2C Wave Length :Ship Length , .- Lat-ea1", W Ale" Bending
Mo-ments Drafts :
Fwd, 25.55' Aft
90-0
Heading,:-0:70 0.00 1.00 i.2i::o
175Loterol .eOnnt AMP I Wave heel tudeL"
5.000IZt_goise-Ship Length
0.40
1.50
Lateraj Waye Bending
Mo-.thents".0;:afti-,2.70,'- NO, 25.,55' Aft
30°' Head:it-le,.
-
-
440, . .
:.Late%n,Montan, ?XI .tuele
+4
smba I 1.1arthThip Length 0.70
0.90
(.75
1.25 1.50
Fig. A-45. Lateral Wave Bending
Mo=-me-iits Drafts: 23.70' Fwd, 25.55' Aft '0° Heading 15 20" 9peed, Knot 0 ' 0.50 244. 0.80 040 x:
UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification
FORM
1 JAN 64 UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification
DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R&D
(Security claseification of title, body of abstract and indexing annotation must be entered when the overall report is classified)
I. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY(Corporate author)
Davidson Laboratory
Stevens Institute of Technology
2a. REPORT SECURITY C LAssiFICATION
Unclassified
2b. GROUP
3. REPORT TITLE
.
MIDSHIP WAVE BENDING MOMENTS IN A MODEL OF THE MARINER-CLASS CARGO SHIP "CALIFORNIA BEAR" RUNNING AT OBLIQUE HEADINGS IN REGULAR WAVES
4. DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (Type of report and inclusive dates)
Technical Report
5. AUTHOR(S)(Last name, first name, initial)
Edward Numata William F. Yonkers
6. REPORT DATE
,
Ncvember 1969
Te. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES
29
76. NO. OF REFS 7
13a. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO.
N00024-67-C-5218
b. PROJECT NO.
SF013-03-04, Task 2022
C.
d.
SA. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMISER(S)
Report 1344
9b. this report)OTHER REPORT No(S) (Any other numbers that may be assigned
SSC-202
10. AVAILABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES
Distribution of this document is unlimited.
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12. SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY
Naval Ship Systems Command
13. ABSTRACT
Vertical and lateral wave bending moments were measured at the midship section of a 1/96-scale model of the C4-S-1A MARINER-class cargo ship
CALIFORNIA BEAR. The model was self-propelled through a ship speed-range
of 10 to 22 knots at seven headings to regular waves of lengths between 0.2 and 2.0 times the length between perpendiculars; moderate wave heights
rot exceeding 1/50 of the model length were used. Results are presented in
charts of bending-moment-amplitude/wave-amplitude versus ship speed, with
wave length as the parameter. Two ship loading conditions, representative
HIslCIASUFTFD Security Classification 14. KEY WORDS Cargo Ship Ship Hulls
Ship Bending Moment Model Tests Water Waves LINK A ROLE WT LINK 8 ROLE WT LINK C ROLE WT INSTRUCTIONS
1. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY: Enter the name and address of the contractor, subcontractor, grantee, Department of
De-fense activity or other organization (corporate author)issuing
the report.
REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION; Enter the
over-all security classification of the report. Indicate whether "Restricted Data" is included. Marking is to be in accord-ance with appropriate security regulations.
GROUP: Automatic downgrading is specified in DoD Di-rective 5200.10 and Armed Forces Industrial Manual. Enter
the group number. Also, when applicable, show that optional
markings have been used for Group 3 and Group 4 as author-ized.
REPORT TITLE: Enter the complete report title in all capital letters. Titles in all cases should be unclassified. If a meaningful title cannot be selected without classifica-tion, show title classification mall capitals in parenthesis
immediately following the title.'
DESCRIPTIVE NOTES: If appropriate, enter the type of report, e.g., interim, progress, summary, annual, Or final.
Give the inclusive dates when a specific reporting period is
covered.
AUTHOR(S): Enter the name(s) of author(s) anshownon
or in the report. Enter last riame, first name, Middle initial: If military, show rank and branch of service. The name of
the principal author is an absolute, minimum requirement.
REPORT DATE: Enter the date of the report as day,
month, year, or month, year. If more than one date appears
on the report, use date of publication.
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: The total page count
should follow normal pagination procedures, i.e., enter the
number of pages containing information.
NUMBER OF REFERENCES: Enter the total number of
references cited in the report.
8a. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER: If appropriate, enter the applicable number of the contract or grant under which the report was written.
8b, Sc, & 8d. PROJECT NUMBER: Enter the appropriate
military department identification, such as project number, subproject number, system numbers, task number, etc. 9a. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S): Enter the offi-cial report number by which the document will be identified
and controlled by the originating activity. This number must be unique to this report.
Pb. OTHER REPORT NUMBER(S): If the report has been assigned any other report numbers (either by the originator or by the sponsor), also enter this number(s).
10. AVAILABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES: Enter any
lim-itations on further dissemination of the report, other than those
imposed by security Classification, using standard statements such as:
"Qualified requesters may obtain copies of this
report from DDC."
"Foreign announcement and dissemination of this report by DDC is not authorized."
"U. S. Government agencies may obtain copies of
this report directly from DDC. Other qualified DDC
users shall request through
"U. S. military agencies may obtain copies of this report directly from DDC. Other qualified users shall request through
"All distribution of this report is controlled. Qual-ified DDC users shall request through
If the report has been furnished to the Office of Technical
Services, Department of Commerce, for sale to the public,
indi-cate this fact and enter the price, if known.
,11.. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES: Use for additional
explana-tory notes...
SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY: Enter the name of the departmental project office or laboratory sponsoring
(pay-ing for) the research and development. Include address. ABSTRACT: Enter an abstract giving a brief and factual
summary of the document indicative of the report, even though
it may also appear elsewhere in the body of the technical
re-port. If additional space is required, a continuation sheet shall be attached.
It is highly desirable that the abstract of classified reports be unclassified. Each paragraph of the abstract shall end with an indication of the military security classification of the
in-formation in the paragraph, represented as (TS), (S), (C), or (U).
There is no limitation on the length of the abstract. How-ever, the suggested length is from 150 to 225 words.
KEY WORDS: Key words are technically meaningful terms
or short phrases that characterize a report and may be used as index entries for cataloging the report. Key words must be
selected so that no security classification is required.
Identi-fiers, such as equipment model designation, trade name, military project code name, geographic location, may be used as key words but will be followed by an indication of technical con-text. The assignment of links, toles, and weights is optional.
UNCLASSIFIED