EPORT TO THE SEAKEEPING CCN4ITTEE OF THE
.-oer
ai fcrce
wave.
kud nov
ngr a.: :.rInstitute.
;9()
ARCHIEF
Lab.
v. Scheepsbouwkunde
Tecnsche
Hogeschool
Deift
REPOPT to the Seakeeping Committee of the 12th :.T.T.c.
Non-periodical forces and moments on a ship in waves
by Dr. N.K. Ankudinow, U. ... Leningrad, Leningrad Shipbuilding
Insti tate.
SU MM A P Y
A new method to determine the average non periodic hydrodynamic forces and moments exerted on a ship in waves, is advanced. The calculating formulae are derved for unmoving and moving ships among waves in deep and shallow water. The results of Kochin,
1asknd, Haveock, Maruc, ::ewman are obtained from author's
analysis as particular cases.
A very simple formula is proposed for practical evaluation of the added resistance of a ship in obiiue waves. The results can be applied to ships in irregular waves.
-1-Non-periodical fosces and moments on a ship is waves by Dr. ..K. .-inkuiinow
U.O.2.., Leningrad. Leningrad Shipbuilding Thstitute.
REPORT to the Seakeeping Committee of the 12th I.T.T.C.
Par. 1. Unmoving 3hip.
At first we consiier a floating body with no forward sreed, on the surface of an ideal incompressible fluid of finite depth
h.
and is the presence of an incoming wave system, which is incident plane and progressive. The fluid motion is assumed to be harmonic in time with the frequency of oscillating
=2/Th
Besides the conventional unsteady harmonic forces which are due to the oscillatious of the ship in waves there are also higher-order steady forces due to various non-linear effects. These
latter forces are generaly too small to
influence
the oscillatorymotions of the ship but they can nevertheless be isrortant in certain practical cases (for instance in evaluating the power of ships in a seaway and in maneuvering). There is not very much theoretical work available (1) - (6; in this subject.
Chiefly the longitudional and lateral osciilatiofls have been
investigated.
The main reason for this is that the problem is nonlinear in nature and rather complicated. Below we develop the general method for evaluating these forces for a ship with six degrees of freedom. All the abovementioned results can be obtained from it as rartcular cases. Our analysis makes use of the usuultechniques of bear wave theory.
Let (x1
y,
z) be Cartesian coordinates with Z = 0 the planeof the undisturbed free surface and the Z - axis positive upwards. The forces and moments are determined by integrating the pressure on the body's wetted surface S.
T
= -
JJp-p0)dS=-fJ1/o-pO)Izn)ds,
(1)where [p-p0) s expressed by the pressure equation
p
= - p
°ad82
pz
(2)and
°(X,Y,Z,t)°X,Y,2)eXfi(L6ut)
represent the full velocity otential.The formula (1) can be written in an other form making use of the following relations
pJJas +pjjf
(gza.dY_(
QJldS * Fits
And by ana.ogy with the :orces we find for the moments
f1J
JfO(xs
+pfJ[f
Z2((
°)Jds *J7hs
where
F
, express the hydrostatic forces and are considered to be known.
If we take the average value of the above equations during one period, the first periodical terms vanish and we obtain the time independent mean hydrodynrimic forces and moments, which are the square of tne first-order quantities.
If we put ,where designates the function
wnicn has a source singularity on S and is the reguiar
function in the whole half space1 we obtain (for brevity only for the forces)
,=jFct
(d°gwd 1D)a% ojdJdt
Or taking into account the hrmonio motion
=pRejJ[
a4p2° ccL?o_fl°2ad
o_
where O here and below is the conjugate complex of °.
.'e note (7) keeps its value over any surface S., enclosing
[].
Next we can ut.,00=ow*o
,(3)
where
-K,(XCOS *yWv&)
()
e
is the (linearized) potential of the incident wave system and is the disturbance due to the presence of the body.
Here a = is the wave amplitude, K
=---
is the wavenumber connected with the frequency 6a by the relationship
=-=
Koth.KohE is
the angle of wave incidence relativeto the -axis ( = 1300 for head waves). The potential
satisfying Laplace's equation and all boundary conditions, can be written as
4-7Zao -K/LKW I f
JJ
(K*p)CIi,ic'(2+1i)ê2=
8L2f Je
--y o
-o(L)
z2= (X_)2(y_)2(2_C)2,
w0=XCL7SO+i$LI7..8Here
H(KJ8) and
H(K,S)
areKochin Hfunctions[H(X,B)H(K,8)J
h-Hu(,8) jJ(__
cft K(C'e
K(cos8 +Lit8)d
On
CKh
and L
lays in the upper half of the K-Diane near the pole KNow
'e substitute
(3)
into
(7)
='JOReJJf[zod
r-
++ [a
-
*
(12)
The members [
]O
and[.. ]D
Lecause , and 02are
harmonic inside S and therefore tne surface S may be reduced to a
point. The bracket [.. ]- exrresses the forces due to oscillation
of the body in still water. The members [..] correspond to the
interaction of the oscilations of a body and waves. Finally e
derive
i=fPRe[-JJ e2H(-8)O1-G)kKd&
--
2fJ
(Kh(D)C
K-Ch(,9) =-1s
+sid7* )IK,8).
t
is easy to obtain Koch:n' s results{ 1 3 assuming ft = U.
Separating the real and imaginary part of the above
exrression,
the projections of re given by=
sf!Hh(Ko,e)I2c:d8 +
cRe[H-Ka,E)J
2m
I52
e/2K9 *
C=- '
L0f(1*
R/HKa,E)J.
Suppostng h - we get aruo' s and Newman' s seoul ts for
the
forces X and Y . If we put
m
6 ./t
°m Um
HK,8)=Y hç
(K,8) + H7 {xç8)/7tl
in still water; O7 is the scattering potential, we find
nr RX
(to)
(lLf)
(15)
(i6
R'=Rt *R *Rt #RC3
[Um=um6Dt)
D* jO9K0 6I\t
fflrf/R(-,8)u/2cos8d9,
(17)
R=
I /Hh(#,9)/2cosOde
coRe[H(-k0,)],
R-
Re{
L K(-k0,D)H
(-K9,8)(cosf-cos8)8),
(1 7c) D (flf -ILRscos/c.[XFm]mea
=Le0afJ(W
)s
(17d)Here is R - from oscillation n still water, R - from
St Sc
scattering, R*.t is the interfering component, R is the component from the interaction of the incident waves and the oscillation of a body.
The expression (17) has been derived by Haskind using the momentum
theorem
[5].
For the small wave amplitudesa,
generated by thedisturbances of a body
aH2O()
, (m=1,2...7)R(2)
Rt(2),
R3 ()
and for practical purposes we can assumeRz
= COf_p9aetH
(ko,Em
]mett fz pezLaThe nathema:icai anaiys:s for t4 .s anaogica to
The fin expression is given by
2k
m{/J j e
KtftKkK,9,8}
w n crc 5h8)-{t[H (K,8)
hb(K.8)]+j[tcosB- H(K,a)]
[i sn B H(K,5)
-H(kB)=JJn(h)ceC0S8+Ts
/For exampe, the first projec:on
t.l,
becomes equalefJ je
(-KO)[N (-K,8)+tSJZ9h2 (-,k9
(_K,
/H,e-L
--
2 jH(-,e)LH(k.
e-l the above resUe-lts can
be
applied to deep water if we take intoaccount that for h= ri'
and also-for the oscillation in still water if a3.
Par. 2 ship ith the constant Thrward speed U
Keepin, the early approximations and connect:ng the coordinate system with the moving ship, for and 11 we can use the
cz
formulae of type (6) substituting only
o
p0
=
-e
(=-uK0coE)
(21)Here is the potential corresponding to motion of the ship in stil water with speed
U
As a result we derive from (6).
L =
-[qta0
-°
±*
-
g]dsJdt22
The members in ( give the forces F st.w. exerted on a ship
during motion in still water. (.. )= 0 and (
i=
0because of periodicity in each of them. Finally
d(wz)rd(
*)_
+.c. the mean hydrodynamic forces in waves don't depend on the forces from motion in quiet water.
The subseauent transformations (23) are practically the same as
for J=0 except as regards tse neaning of which must satisfy
more oralex boundary conditions. Jsing the potentia. , obtained
by the author, we find for
m
w
-=-p
Re{-f Je2
I i(J
K2 H&[K,) CK&
Kr c'
Q- Kca 5)2J
2c fleLL Lrepresented in projections
with
the relp of (13a).Expressions for fri differ fro by 5 and S instead
of C and . in the expressions (2') the contour
(i,) and (L) are defined
2=VKtKh
Y=_Vt
foz cos8>0
czndi<'foz co8<O
0where roots
k
d;erir,±ated from equationor graphically from the foJowing figure
ç L
2
(23)
-6
8
is determined by the condition(25)
/ VKB LhK9JL ±6
[C08]cDniptexCoS8oJ
2K0U/
z oo t.swhere K5 is the real root of the equation
Sit KI1ChKIt
6
(25a)
2dL2Kit/xthKk
j
For h.-oo
from (25) ar.d (25a)cos8
'For the most interesting force, i.e. the added resistance
R(XmXtw)
we obtain the more simple expressionX-80 /2 k',.
/Hh(K,L.,5)Co38a.8
+R=(J
(k2)_J(K1)±J(g))
2K228
0 8 Ch-2K,,jt-Re[Hk0,a)]cos.
(2/)
(26)Using (16))we derive R , , and . It is easy to
st SC In WS
prove that is the leading term in the series expansion to
ws
respect j'3 and for practical application we recommend tuse
6
0056
[
where the exciting forces and moments must include the influence of speed. For example, for longitudional waves we have
L(6ti-Ep)
c'os=±1
,U,O
,-z.e
,e=F0
exp(L6t*E)
=1 exp(t6t
RfOeeowX[1oJtFaCL1
0-.ssuming
?=O and
FFW
, we derive Havelock's formula (2].Figure 1 (a, b) shows the cilculated and experimental added resistance
of cargo ship ( - =
7,3)
for = 3,2,The experiment was carried out in the model Basin af Leningrad Shipbuilding Institute, the calculated results have been obtained with computer programs.
In conclusion we indicate that the above results can be applied for evaluating the mean forces in irregular waves if we ise the possibility of linear superposition and assume these forces to be proportional to the squared amplitude of the wave. For a ship moving into two-dimensional irregular waves with the spectrum E(6)
(corrected for the speed) we can assume
where
4(5) is the mean force
in a plane regular wave ofv=/,Z.G)
(30)
REFERENCES
Kochin, N.E., "The Theory of Waves Generated by
Oscillations
of a Body under the Free Surfice of a Heavy IncorrpressibleFluid",
Moscow, 1938.
Havelock, T.H., "Drifting Force on
a Ship among Waves",
Philosophical Magazine,v.33, Nr. 224, 191+2.
Maruo, H., "The Drift of a Body Floating on Waves", Journal of Ship Research, v. , Nr. ,
1960.
. The Society of Naval Architects of Japan 60th Anniversary
Series V.
2, 1957, v.
81963.
Haskind, M.D.,
"The Theory
ofthe Resistance of Ships Moving
Through 'Naves", Jzv. Akad. Nauk. SSSP. Otd. Tekhn. Nauk.,Mek.., Mashinostr.,