• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

The interior structure of Mercury constrained by geodesy data and new experimental data about iron-rich alloys

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The interior structure of Mercury constrained by geodesy data and new experimental data about iron-rich alloys"

Copied!
8
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

The interior structure of Mercury constrained by geodesy data and

new experimental data about iron-rich alloys

Attilio Rivoldini, Tim Van Hoolst, and Marie-Hélène Deproost Observatoire Royal de Belgique

GGWG ESTEC 2019

(2)

Geodesy data

• Margot et al. 2012 


Obliquity: 2.04 ± 0.08 arcmin

MOI=0.345 ± 0.014 (4%)
 Libration amplitude: 38.5 ±1.6 arcsec (4%)

• Stark et al. 2015


Obliquity: 2.03 ± 0.09 arcmin

MOI=0.345 ± 0.014 (4%)
 Libration amplitude: 38.9 ±1.3 arcsec (3%)

• Verma et al. 2016


Tidal Love number: k

2

=0.46 ± 0.02 (4%)

• Genova et al. 2019


Obliquity: 1.97 ± 0.009 arcmin

MOI=0.333 ± 0.0015 (0.5%)
 Libration amplitude: 40.0 ± 8.7 arcsec (20%)


Tidal Love number: k

2

=0.57 ± 0.03 (5.2%)

• Konopliv et al. 2020


Obliquity: 1.99 ± 0.12 arcmin

MOI=0.337 ± 0.02 (~6%)
 Tidal Love number: k

2

=0.53 ± 0.03 (5.6%)


MOI ↓ and k 2

core radius ↓ core radius ↑

Pole right ascension and declination fr om moving surface featur es

Pole right ascension and declination fr om MESSENGER orbit

(3)

New thermodynamic model for liquid-Fe alloys

• based on measured densities (up to 5 GPa) and acoustic sound velocities (up to 14 GPa) of liquid (Fe 73 Ni 10 S 17 , Fe 60 Ni 10 S 30 ), liquid (Fe 61 Ni 10 Si 29 , Fe 52 Ni 10 Si 38 ), and liquid Fe eos

• predicted low and high pressure elastic properties are in good agreement with previously measured low pressure and high pressure data (up to 60GPa)

Pressure and Composition Effects on Sound Velocity and Density of Core‐Forming Liquids: Implication to Core

Compositions of Terrestrial Planets

Hidenori Terasaki1 , Attilio Rivoldini2 , Yuta Shimoyama1 , Keisuke Nishida3 , Satoru Urakawa4, Mayumi Maki1, Fuyuka Kurokawa1, Yusaku Takubo1, Yuki Shibazaki5,6, Tatsuya Sakamaki7, Akihiko Machida8, Yuji Higo9 , Kentaro Uesugi9 , Akihisa Takeuchi9, Tetsu Watanuki8, and Tadashi Kondo1

1Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan,2Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium,3Department of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,4Department of Earth Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan, 5Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 6Now at International Center for Young Scientists, National Institute for Materials Science, Ibaraki, Japan, 7Department of Earth Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 8Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Hyogo, Japan, 9Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Hyogo, Japan

Abstract

A compositional variety of planetary cores provides insight into their core/mantle evolution and chemistry in the early solar system. To infer core composition from geophysical data, a precise

knowledge of elastic properties of core‐forming materials is of prime importance. Here, we measure the sound velocity and density of liquid Fe‐Ni‐S (17 and 30 at% S) and Fe‐Ni‐Si (29 and 38 at% Si) at high pressures and report the effects of pressure and composition on these properties. Our data show that the addition of sulfur to iron substantially reduces the sound velocity of the alloy and the bulk modulus in the conditions of this study, while adding silicon to iron increases its sound velocity but has almost no effect on the bulk modulus. Based on the obtained elastic properties combined with geodesy data, S or Si content in the core is estimated to 4.6 wt% S or 10.5 wt% Si for Mercury, 9.8 wt% S or 18.3 wt% Si for the Moon, and 32.4 wt% S or 30.3 wt% Si for Mars. In these core compositions, differences in sound velocity profiles between an Fe‐Ni‐S and Fe‐Ni‐Si core in Mercury are small, whereas for Mars and the Moon, the differences are substantially larger and could be detected by upcoming seismic sounding missions to those bodies.

Plain Language Summary

To estimate core compositions of terrestrial planets using geophysical data with high‐pressure physical property of core‐forming materials, we measure the sound velocity and density of liquid Fe‐Ni‐S and Fe‐Ni‐Si at high pressures. The effect of S and Si on elastic properties are quite different in the present conditions. Based on the obtained physical properties combined with geodesy data, S or Si content in the core of Mercury, Moon, and Mercury are estimated. In these core compositions,

differences in sound velocity profiles between an Fe‐Ni‐S and Fe‐Ni‐Si core in Mars and the Moon are substantially large and could be detected by upcoming seismic sounding mission to Mars.

1. Introduction

Mercury, Mars, and Earth's moon (the Moon) are reported, from geophysical observations, to have a liquid core (Margot et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2001; Yoder et al., 2003). These planetary bodies are thought to have a core that mainly consists of Fe‐5 ~ 10 wt% Ni and of some fractions of light elements (LEs; S, Si, O, C, and H; Dreibus & Wänke, 1985; Smith et al., 2012; Steenstra et al., 2016). Thus, the core is one of the major reser- voirs of LEs in planetary body. Knowledge of the composition of the core of terrestrial planets is important not only for inferring the internal structure and thermal state of a planet, which strongly influence the core/mantle dynamics and their evolution, but also for understanding the distribution of LE in the solar neb- ula of the inner solar system (e.g., Rubie et al., 2015). To obtain constraints on the core composition, sound velocity and density of liquid Fe‐alloys measured under planetary core conditions are indispensable infor- mation together with geodesy and geophysical data, such as mean density, moment of inertia, tidal Love number, and seismic wave velocity.

©2019. American Geophysical Union.

All Rights Reserved.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

10.1029/2019JE005936

Key Points:

• The sound velocity and density of liquid Fe‐Ni‐S (17 and 30 at% S) and Fe‐Ni‐Si (29 and 38 at% Si) were measured up to 14 GPa

• Based on the obtained elastic properties, estimated S contents in the core are 4.6 wt% S for Mercury and 32.4 wt% S for Mars

• Difference in sound velocity between the Fe‐Ni‐S and Fe‐Ni‐Si core is large enough to be detected in the core compositions of Mars and Moon

Correspondence to:

H. Terasaki,

terasaki@ess.sci.osaka‐u.ac.jp

Citation:

Terasaki, H., Rivoldini, A., Shimoyama, Y., Nishida, K., Urakawa, S., Maki, M., et al (2019). Pressure and composition effects on sound velocity and density of core‐forming liquids: Implication to core compositions of terrestrial planets.

Journal of Geophysical Research:

Planets, 124, 2272–2293. https://doi.

org/10.1029/2019JE005936

Received 5 FEB 2019 Accepted 7 AUG 2019

Accepted article online 13 AUG 2019 Published online 28 AUG 2019

Author Contributions:

Conceptualization: Hidenori Terasaki Formal analysis: Hidenori Terasaki Investigation: Hidenori Terasaki Methodology: Keisuke Nishida Writing ‐ original draft: Hidenori Terasaki, Keisuke Nishida

TERASAKI ET AL. 2272

⇒ thermodynamic model valid for the whole (x,p,T) range of Mercury’s liquid core

(4)

Prior assumptions, modeling, and data

• crust: density [2700, 3100]kg/m

3

and thickness [15,120]km

• mantle elastic properties compatible with forsterite-enstatite mixture

• inner core radius and light element fraction in agreement with liquidus; assume Si concentration in liquid below eutectic composition (because of unknown liquidus at those compositions); core radius prior [1800, 2200]km

• prior core-mantle boundary temperature between eutectic temperature and (optimistic) mantle solidus

• libration amplitude calculated by taking into account gravitational core-mantle coupling and mantle induced core density stratification (Dumberry et al., 2013)

• geodesy data: 88 day libration amplitude Margot et al. 2012+obliquity+ k

2

1) Konopliv 2020, 2) Genova 2019, 3) Margot 2012 (with k

2

from Konopliv 2020),

4) Verma 2016 (with obliquity from Margot 2012)

(5)

Results: Core radius

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ���� ����

���� ������[��]

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ���� ����

���� ������[��]

Liquid core models Inner core models

Fe-S Fe-Si

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ����

���� ������[��]

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ����

���� ������[��]

Liquid core models Fe-S

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma rcmb [km] 201626 201317 201725 200827

xS [wt%] 3.8-7.4 3.9-5.9 3.9-7.5 3.5-7.4

Inner core models Fe-S

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma rcmb [km] 198716 200011 198716 197220

xS [wt%] 3.5-5.8 4.4-6.0 3.5-5.8 2.4-5.6

Liquid core models Fe-Si

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma rcmb [km] 200829 199819 201129 200331

xSi [wt%] 6.4-12.7 6.4-10.0 6.6-12.8 6.0-12.8

Inner core models Fe-Si

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma rcmb [km] 200917 202114 201014 199920

xSi [wt%] 11.2-15.0 12.2-15.2 11.4-15.0 10.6-15.1

• Fe-Si models require more light elements since Fe-Si alloys are denser than Fe-S alloys

• core radius at 1σ : 1952-2043 km

• core radius mostly driven by k

2

value

(6)

Results: Inner core radius

Fe-S Fe-Si

Inner core models Fe-S

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma rcmb [km] 198716 200011 198716 197220

ricb [km] 0-1380 0-1174 0-1347 0-1495

Inner core models Fe-Si

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma rcmb [km] 200917 202114 201014 199920

ricb [km] 1306-2003 1346-2007 1345-2002 1345-2002

• inner core radius at 3σ: Fe-S : 0-1495 km and Fe-Si: 1306-2007 km

• expect to loose inner core radius constraint with Fe-S-Si models!

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

��� ���� ���� ����

����� ���� ������[��]

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

��� ���� ���� ����

����� ���� ������[��]

(7)

Results: Model fit

Fe-S Fe-Si

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ���� ����

���*

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

��� ��� ��� ���

*

Liquid core models Inner core models

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ����

���*

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

��� ��� ��� ���

*

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ���� ����

���*

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

��� ��� ��� ��� ���

*

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

���� ���� ���� ���� ����

���*

Konopliv 2020 Genova 2019 Margot*2012 Verma 2016

��� ��� ��� ���

*

Score: Liquid core models

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma

MOI 0/0 -/- +/+ +/+

k2 0/0 -/- -/- +/+

Score: Inner core models

Konopliv Genova Margot Verma

MOI +/0 -/- -/0 -/0

k2 0/0 -/- -/- +/+

likelihood: + high, 0 moderate, - marginal

(8)

Conclusions

• models with and without inner core agree with geodesy data but liquid Fe-Si models require somewhat unlikely high present-day core temperatures

• core radius ~[1952,2043] 1σ km

• inner core radius: Fe-S: ~[0,1500] 3σ km and Fe-Si:~[1300,2010] 3σ km


⇒expect to loose inner core constraint for Fe-S-Si models

• high likelihood for models with MOI-k 2 from Margot 2012-Verma 2016 and significantly lower likelihood with MOI-k 2 from Genova 2019

• not used constraints:


- without a growing inner core past and present dynamo cannot be explained
 - 7km radial contraction of Mercury requires a relative small inner core and limited amount of core cooling


- magnetospheric induced currents require a core radius of 2066±22km

(Wardinski 2019)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

‣ core S composition inferences deduced from geodesy data and interior modeling are in agreement with geochemical constraints (xS≲21wt%). ‣ but those results are not in agreement

• inner core radius and light element fraction in agreement with liquidus; assume Si concentration in liquid below eutectic composition (because of unknown liquidus at

(2009) and experimental data (green: solid circle – solid iron, solid square – carbide, and open symbols – coexisting liquid) at 5 GPa from Chabot et al. (2008) are also plotted

• models with an inner core can have mantle boundary temperatures below the mantle solidus 1Gyr after formation and agree with the timing of occurrence of the lunar dynamo, but

▪ Master przełącza stan linii SDA i SCL, wysyła adres docelowy do wszystkich urządzeń.. ▪ Slave o podanym adresie odpowiada bitem ACK, przełącza stan

Voor de verdeling van de totals toegevoerde warmte wordt aangenomen dat de gehele ingespoten hoeveelheid brandstof. isochoor verbrandt, indien deze hoeveelheid

Downloaded by [Universitaetsbibliothek Bielefeld] at 22:39 11 November 2015.. the full coverage of all Chinese citizens via a widening social safety net. Despite a strong..

Z czasem okazało się bowiem, że sacrum zajmuje poczesne miejsce w aksjologii literatury zarysowywanej przez Sawickiego: znalazłszy się w tytułach trzech jego książek -