The emergence of
regional
governance
Challenge the future
Sp
atialPlanning
Consolidation of objectives in Spatial
Planning around the notion of sustainability:
•
Delivery of sustainable and fair
futures
•
Increased public goods
•
Redistribution of gains
•
Increase life chances and
‘Enhanced’ Sustainability
“For sustainability to occur, it must occur simultaneously in each of its three dimensions” (economic, social and
environmental) Larsen, 2012
sustainability
social economic
The rise of the city
region as a relevant unit
for planning
Randstad
BosWash
These new kinds of cities
present new challenges
Planning happens in
much more complex socio
political arenas
Governance (normative)
Private Sector Civil Society Public SectorGovernance (descriptive)
Private Sector Civil Society Public Sector Civil Public Sector Coalitions between sectors and within sectorsUrban planners &
Governance entails
an understanding of how policy making and implementation happens in complex societies
Changes in governing
(& planning)
Emergence of a particular style of governing where there must be
sustained co-ordination and
coherence among a wide variety of actors with different purposes and objectives from all sectors of
society.
Multilevel governance
‘Involves a large numberof decision-making
arenas, differentiated
along both functional and territorial lines and
interlinked in a non-hierarchical way’
Network governance
Policy-making and implementation is ‘shared’ by
politicians, technocrats, experts,
dedicated agencies, authorities, semi private and private companies, the
public, NGOs, etc
which constitute NETWORKS of policy and decision making across levels,
Sao Paulo in South America
Pacific A m a z o n B a s i n Andes Mountains Mato Grosso Plateau A n d e s M o u n t a i n s A ta cam a D e se rt P a m p a s Macapa Antofagasta Arica Concepcion Iquique Valparaiso Cucuta Mitu Puno Talara Bahia Blanca Mendoza Resistencia Salta San Miguel De Tucuman SanRafael San Salvador De Jujuy Tarija Aracaju Boa Vista Campo Grande Cuiaba Imperatriz Porto Velho Rio Branco Santarem Tarauaca Teresina Pasto Apoteri Bluefields Concepcion C. Oviedo Arequipa Ayacucho Cerro De Pasco Cocama Cuzco Huanuco Ica Iquitos Orellana Sullana Tacna Durazno Paysandu Tacuarembo Ciudad Bolivar Maturin Puerto Ayacucho San Cristobal Foz Do Iguacu Puerto Cabezas Barquisimeto Brazil Argentina Uruguay Paraguay Bolivia Peru Chile Ecuador Colombia Venezuela GuianaSuriname French Guiana
> than 10 million inh.(megalopolis)
> than 5 million inh.(continental metropolis)
> than 3 million inh.(metropolis)
> than 1 million inh.(big city)
São Paulo > than 18 million inh.
Bogota Medellin Lima Cali Maracaibo Caracas Belem
Sao Luis Fortaleza
Recife Salvador Goiania Belo Horizonte Rio de Janeiro São Paulo Curitiba Buenos Aires Montevideo
Florianopolis Porto Alegre Manaus Brasilia Vitoria Santos Campinas Natal Maceio Joinville Cordoba Rosario Santiago La Paz Santa Cruz Asuncion Barranquilla Quito Guayaquil Valencia Callao
Please,
Sao Paulo is a divided global city
in a fast growing developing country
Human Development
Compared
0 20km N Anhanguera Perus Jaragua S. D omingos Pirituba Freguesia do O Brasilandia Limao Cachoei-rinha M andaqui Casa Verde Santana Trememb e Tucuruvi Jacana Vila M edeiros Vila Maria Vila Guilherme Cangaiba Penha Tatuape Carrao Belem M ooca Agua Rasa Vila Matilde Vila Formosa Ermelino M atarazzo Itaquera Ponte Rasa Artur Alvim Cidade Lider Parque do Carmo Jose Bonifacio Cidade Tiradentes Guaianases Lajeado Vila Curuca Itaim Paulista Jardim Helena Sao M iguel Vila Jacui Iguatemi Sao Rafael Sao Mateus Sapopopembaemba Aricanduva Sao Lucas Vila Pruden te Ipiranga Sacoma Cursino Jabaquara Cidade Ademar Pedreira Cidade D utra Grajau Socorro Camp o Grande Santo Amaro Parelheiros M arsilac Jardim A ngela Jardim Sao Luis Capao Redondo Camp o Limp o Vila Andrade Vila Sonia M orumbi Raposo TavaresRio Pequeno Butanta
Jaguare Vila Leopoldina Lapa Jaragua Alto de Pinheiros Itaim Bibi M oema Camp o Belo Saude Vila M ariana Jardim Paulista Pinheiros Perdizes Barra Funda Consolacao Santa Cecilia Bela Vista Lib erdade Cambuci Bras Pari Bom Retiro Se republica Norway Norway Iceland Iceland Australia Australia SWEDEN SWEDEN Netherlands Japan Denmark Finland FRance Austria Austria New Zealand germany spain spain Hong kong Hong kong singapore singapore slovenia s.Korea kyrgyztan Dominican Rep. S. Korea S.KOrea Cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus Czech Rep. Malta MALTA MALTA Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina poland poland chile chile estonia slovakia qatar bahrain bahrain croatia cyprus uruguay latvia st kitts bahamas bahamas bahamas seychelles seychelles cuba cuba cuba mexico bulgaria Panama Panama lybia lybia lybia Malaysia Malaysia Russia mauritius bosnia oman Albania thailand venezuela saudi arabia ukraine ukraine ukraine ukraine peru kazakhstan Dominican republic China sri lanka sri lanka turkey bulgaria
Sky high: SWEDEN Very high: Spain high: Czech republic
moderately high: mexico Medium: thailand
Medium to low: kyrgystan
HDI Human development index (2007( city of sao paulo districts compared
data source: PMSP and IBGE/PNUD 2007
there are no districts that score less than 0.7, therefore no district with low HDI the lowest HDI index belongs to marsilac (0.701
0 20km N Anhanguera Perus Jaragua S. D omingos Pirituba Freguesia do O Brasilandia Limao Cachoei-rinha M andaqui Casa Verde Santana Trememb e Tucuruvi Jacana Vila M edeiros Vila Maria Vila Guilherme Cangaiba Penha Tatuape Carrao Belem M ooca Agua Rasa Vila Matilde Vila Formosa Ermelino M atarazzo Itaquera Ponte Rasa Artur Alvim Cidade Lider Parque do Carmo Jose Bonifacio Cidade Tiradentes Guaianases Lajeado Vila Curuca Itaim Paulista Jardim Helena Sao M iguel Vila Jacui Iguatemi Sao Rafael Sao Mateus Sapopopembaemba
Aricanduva Sao Lucas Vila Pruden te Ipiranga Sacoma Cursino Jabaquara Cidade Ademar Pedreira Cidade D utra Grajau Socorro Camp o Grande Santo Amaro Parelheiros M arsilac Jardim A ngela Jardim Sao Luis Capao Redondo Camp o Limp o Vila Andrade Vila Sonia M orumbi Raposo Tavares
Rio Pequeno Butanta
Jaguare Vila Leopoldina Lapa Jaragua Alto de Pinheiros Itaim Bibi M oema Camp o Belo Saude Vila M ariana Jardim Paulista Pinheiros Perdizes Barra Funda Consolacao Santa Cecilia Bela Vista Lib erdade Cambuci Bras Pari Bom Retiro Se republica Norway Norway Iceland Iceland Australia Australia SWEDEN SWEDEN Netherlands Japan Denmark Finland FRance Austria Austria New Zealand germany spain spain Hong kong Hong kong singapore singapore slovenia s.Korea kyrgyztan Dominican Rep. S. Korea S.KOrea Cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus cyprus Czech Rep. Malta MALTA MALTA Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina poland poland chile chile estonia slovakia qatar bahrain bahrain croatia cyprus uruguay latvia st kitts bahamas bahamas bahamas seychelles seychelles cuba cuba cuba mexico bulgaria Panama Panama lybia lybia lybia Malaysia Malaysia Russia mauritius bosnia oman Albania thailand venezuela saudi arabia ukraine ukraine ukraine ukraine peru kazakhstan Dominican republic China sri lanka sri lanka turkey bulgaria
Sky high: SWEDEN Very high: Spain
high: Czech republic
moderately high: mexico Medium: thailand
Medium to low: kyrgystan
HDI Human development index (2007(
city of sao paulo districts compared
data source: PMSP and IBGE/PNUD 2007
there are no districts that score less than 0.7, therefore no district with low HDI the lowest HDI index belongs to marsilac (0.701
Sao Paulo is the financial and managerial
centre of South America. It is also its hugest hub for advertising and fashion.
An extended metropolitan complex with 5
contiguous metropolitan areas
The metropolitan area
The metropolitan area
The municipality
Main municipalities in the Expanded Metropolitan Complex Other municipalities in the Expanded Metropolitan Complex Other municipalities in the State of Sao Paulo
Main highway Regional highway
Viracopos Airport
Sorocaba Airport Congonhas Airport
Campo de Marte Airport
Sao Paulo International Airport
Ernesto Stumpf Airpot
Port of Santos
11. Alto Paraiba
5. Paraiba Macro- Axis
13. Mantiqueira 10. Bocaina 14. Litoral Norte 3. Santos 1. Core 2. MASP 4. Campinas 6. Sorocaba 7. Jundiai 8. Bragantina 9. Sao Roque
12. Water Sources Circuit
Santos
Sao Roque
Jundiai Campinas
Sorocaba
Sao Jose dos Campos
Multilevel governance in emerging city-regions
0 15 30 45 km 1: 1 500 000
1 CM = 15 KM
11. Alto Paraiba
5. Paraiba Macro- Axis
13. Mantiqueira 10. Bocaina 14. Litoral Norte 3. Santos 1. Core 2. MASP 4. Campinas 6. Sorocaba 7. Jundiai 8. Bragantina 9. Sao Roque
12. Water Sources Circuit
Santos Sao Roque
Jundiai Campinas
Sorocaba
Sao Jose dos Campos
1. Core Municipality 2. Greater Sao Paulo (MASP) 3. Metropolitan Santos 4. Metropolitan Campinas 5. Paraiba Macro Axis Proto Metropolis 6. Sorocaba Proto Metropolis 7. Jundiai Peri-Metropolitan Regional Unit
8. Bragantina Peri-Metro Regional Unit 9. Sao Roque Peri-Metro Regional Unit 10. Bocaina Peri-Metro Regional Unit
12. The 'Water Circuit' Homogeneous Outer Metro Unit 13. Mantiqueira Homogeneous Outer Metro Unit 14. Litoral Norte Homogeneous Outer Metro Unit 11. Alto Paraiba Peri-Metro Regional Unit
Main unit urban node Other important urban node Airport
Core: 11.3 million (31 sub-municipalities) Metro: 19.9 million (39 municipalities)
175 km Ph ot o by Sã o Pa ulo , B ra zil , a t N igh t - NA S A Earth Observatory
Example of a
city-region in a
middle-income
country
Who plans the region?
The State of Sao Paulo
Secretary of Metropolitan Development
State System of Metropolitan Development Chamber of Metropolitan Development
Ministry of Cities: The Statute of Cities +Ministry of Planning and Development
Secretary of Metropolitan Development (+EMPLASA)
95 municipalities of Macro-metropolis + 5 metropolitan councils+ sectorial enterprises
Secretary of Metropolitan Development Paulista Enterprise for Metropolitan Development Metropolitan Fund for Investment and Finance 5 Metropolitan Councils
Main partner
EMPLASA: Paulista Enterprise for
Metropolitan Planning
Main tasks
Institutional organisation
Coordination and feasibility Planning foundations
Territorial Planning
Areas where multi-level
networked governance is
+ 928 local bus lines on core municipality
Metropolitan mobility
S ao P au lo Co mpn hi a Me tr opo lit an a d e Tr an spo rt esWater and waste
management
Source: Google Earth
Informal development around one of Sao Paulo’s water reservoirs
Large Regional Infrastructure
Source: Google Earth
Congonhas: the busiest airport in South America and its integration in the city
Large Regional Infrastructure
Source: http://upgradesemanal.blogspot.nl/2011/04/trem-bala-no-brasil.html
The route of the proposed speed train between Rio de Janeiro and the city of Campinas
Environmental protection and
management
Source: Google Earth
The new external ring road of Sao Paulo crossing the water reservoirs of the city and large parts of the
Main challenges of city
regions:
•Mobility/ Interconnectivity
•Environmental protection
•Governance
•Resources management
Integrated water
resources management
Perhaps the most urgent regionalgovernance challenge is the management of
water
Water management :
organisecd in river basin
committees
Governance (normative)
Private Sector Civil Society Public SectorAlto Tiete River Basin Committee River Basin Committee Plenary Executive Board Technical Committees Area Subcommittees
State
Cities
Civil SocietyCivil
Composition of the River Water basin
Committee Plenary
16 municipalities representatives 16 State agencies or departments 16 Civil Society representatives
Civil Society?
Slum Federation of the State of Sao Paulo >
Industry Federation of the State of Sao Paulo
Features
A literal translation of the governance model, with integral participation of
stakeholders (including the private initiative) in the decision making
process, but...
Metropolitan
mobility and
World Cup Stadium
click for movie Source: http://esportes.r7.com/futebol/fotos/r7-exclusivo-fotos- aereas-revelam-como-estao-os-novos-estadios-de-sp-e-os-ultimos-dias-do-pacaembu-20130115-4.html#fotosMain problems in regional
planning and design
1. GOVERNANCE
a. excessive sectorialization: lack of integration of policies
b. lack of transparence and accountability
c. too many levels of decision
making + too many administrative units: bureaucratic nightmares
Main problems in regional
planning and design
2. LACK OF REGIONAL STRATEGIC VISION
Reactive planning rather than active planning
The regions develops faster than planners can plan it
Policy formulation and implementation
Networks involving:•
public actors (politicians andadministrators) in different decision levels
•
technocrats•
economic agents•
interest representatives (civil + corporate)•
other stakeholdersNew forms of steering complex governance
networks
Deliberation Bargaining
Thanks for listening!
Prepared by Roberto Rocco
Chair of Spatial Planning and Strategy, TU Delft
for information, please contact r.c.rocco@tudelft.nl