Leusden, 6 December 1992
THE DESIGN OF ANCHORING SYSTEMS FOR MERCHANT SHIPS A NEW APPROACH by L.Brink, Msc. (TU.Delft) Naval Architect Master MN(Ret) voor -© 1t
):
i
Introdution
The
reconendtioris on.
safe richorir,q of shii:s mzde by theMer'nti1e
Mririe Trib'.ri.l
of the Nether1ridsafter
the:jriqury into the disaster of the
mit " Mssiuis", in whi'.h 27
persons
lost
their
life,
prompted theD:Lretorte-Gerier.1
Shipping IrId
Mritirne
ffirs of the Ministry of Trmsport ;nd
Puhli
works to pro.h the Netherind Shipmsters'
Asso:i;"-t icm w lh Asso:i;"-the
crp ist to n rOr them OTi ho e pc i cni' o Itheir
memberswith the
methods they use to determine therequired length of .nchor c.hziri.
In order to comply
with the
request, the NetherinidShip-masters' Associtioni
requested their members for i.nform;Ltiori. Also ommittee offour members w.s formed to inivestiqte the
s;.fen,hc'riniii of ships
The reommen,dztioris made by the
Mercritile
Marine Tr:i.hun;nJ.oriernt :
the use of
the "ru 1 CS C) f i'imb '' tn deferm:j. TIC therequ :1 red I enu1:h oF
r:hor
i ni.ni i. nivCS....h qat 1 cDri :i. rito the i..ise of the present d;.y
o--puter tehriology to assist
the ship' s master' in om"piex situt:.onis such
s nichorinq n adverse wethev'conditions
In the
courseof
the inivestiq.tionis
it
becrne quitethat:
the use of
the "ru 1 CS C) f thumb. " shou 1 d he b.iindonedin favour of deterrniniin
the required chiru ierith by
rnents 0 the citeniry equ;t:i. ons
-
the desiri philosophy
of nchoririg systems former-chant si-u ps required i..ipdzt :i Tic;
Becus the purpose of
this paper is
highi ii-ut the i.pdtiri
of
the desiqri phi :Losophy of .nichor:i.ntç; systems for mercjarit sluips,tiic determirit i on of the required cIiiri
lenith by meansof
the cterizry eqijt,ioni will
he de1t with
in .genuerl wy
;nid not in 3ret depth
The required ].erigth of anchor chain.
Trdition.l ly seaf.rers
used "rules of thumb"deter--mine -'-ho Lenucth of cL-i;:Lni required for
.mchorin ..bhir
Ships These ru:Les re .enuerl ly based onratio
o-F length ofchini CL) niCI
tiic depth
of water' Cd) .Rtios such
:L/d 3or 1. C . 'Sd whereby C i; 27 . for U2 ;.nud 38 . 7 for tJ3 ::. ri ;m'e
'..ised . I- nuruber C)f vi' :i. ;t ions C)n these ru :i. be -1-ounid in
v.r:Lous rc fy'pTi('p5 . rhO r;t:i. o :1 s i 1 re -I
'dto.s t hp
scope,
d
Figure No.1.
TIlE ANCIIORLINE CALCULATION MODEL
Is4S- ' - Fg
= Wind force
F =. Wave force
g
F = Current force
Fa = Holding Power Anchor
d = Water depth
'
3
By doing so the following points emerçJe:
the
use ofthe
anchor dur1rigberth
1rig arid i_inbethirig;
heaviriçj anchor during arJv
'i;e weather conditions;
there must
he sufficient
power to heave
the anchor
home dijrirug adverse weàthr conditions.
ahclioring;
the
nximum -grouridspeedwhih
is
allowedwhiist
arirhor:Lnig
without
runningthe
risk
to
break the
anich:r chain
the
permissahie
height
;.bove.sahed to
dropthe
anchor .
is
often is the practise,
heavy anchors are
heaved CDI....to a few
meters above
seabe.:i arid thendropped in order to avoid damage to the anchor;
water' depth;
tiie max i mum ater i.:iei:>th the. sJi i p e.ari arii_I-ior
Bear i rig in m i rid these cr i. ter .i. a the ma :1TI items of the mode 1 car
be adressed
The hô1dirg power of the anchor
There are two
aspe_...5 wi :Lch i. ri fluenice the. ciio ice of an anchorEor a ship. TI-ic first :is the
holding power arid the second
the
force requL red to break the embedded anchor from
seabed .-A compieIz
different aspect is ti-ic
influence of
tiie shape of
the anchor on the holding power
Whilst digging itself into tiie seabed,
soil penetrates between
the flukes
arid the shank, Depending
on the
properties of th
soil arid
the
shape of
the
fi....ikessoil may
become cloggedbetween shari l f 1 LIkes arid
so obstri.jct the free
rotat I on o fthe flukes,
consequently t-he
anchor becomesa large
lump ofsol].
which easily breaks
out whenthe pull irig
force exceeds
the soil pressure.
The .F;+ tliat
ti-ic free rcyt_tioni of th
flukes may bE hampercdby badly shaped Fi'.jkes
is considered to be an i..iniwarited
proper-ty of. the anchor
as it directly affects
the holding i°' of
the anchor hence tiie safety of the ship
Generally the
holding
power ofthe
ariclior is çji.veri as ziniemp...1. 1
to.'
ofthe mass
weight 0.1:the anchor
:1 ni a:i. rsi_igçest1riçJtiiatt he
holding power is
a function
of the mass
wciqht This :i.s
only partly tr'.e
because in
the firt place
the underwater mass we:i.cihtis, due to the Archimedes law.
less
V z 0 z F a A 0 A 7 x 0 x ANCHORLINE SHAPES
Ultimate slack
-W = q.l.. z-
_l
- --- ___ - --- - -
'
-CFully developed
Figure no.2
/
/
I.; V F0 -V x 0 x 0 0 Slack5
The
"sick" is
common .It
exists
in modor.to
eriv:Lr'rimorit].corid:Ltioris.
The chiri
lezds forw;rd
arid down unders1it
anGle
Part of the chiri rests Or; ebed
The fully developed shipe exists when
the erivirorimerital condi-"t-ioris h.ve iricre.sed to
suchni extent that
l 1 of the
ch:iiris ii fteci from se;ibed ;rud the end
t sehed is t-ricienut tot he
nicIior sh.ckle. It is the 1-rrisitiori between s1ck ;nidt;.ut.
I3otii t.vjt si-ipes
occur when, the erivironrnonit.3. conditions h.ve.furti-icr irucr'esed .
The ctrtry is pulled tight
;;nid loads ;it:the
nuchor end ujr,der an niqlewith seabed
. 2orisoquent].y avertical component of ti-
NJ1 1 iritiforce attlio
anich'::n' :Locci_Irs
arid the
process of breaking
the anchor
from the soil
has started .
In the '.i ]. timate taut ;haj:e the ...a :Lri :L s stra :1 ghtarid tiqht.
d'agginiq anchor can be expected
b.ei.wooni the fu]. 3. y developedarid ultimate taut shapes
Fo ie deL-ermi nat i. on
of the
roclu i rd :j. içjth : f nchor Tha :i.the f ir ...e sha:.es are of
i riterest si rIce
ti-icy car easily
be calculated.
The ultimate slack shape is
trivia]. arid
bot
others can b.c
cu :1.ated wi tti catoniaryeqiations
The taut
shapes omdriçjer
the ship and must
he avoided
byfJc:)od;ean1an--ship.
In table
rio, 1 theresults of
a c1c'jlationi of the
cateniarylength for various depths arc given
Frcm ni op('atic)ni;;.]. and dosiqni point: C) v:i.e..' :ii].e rio :1. :i.s oF
interest.
In the first place it
shows the importance of
having reliab].e
data on
ti-ic holding
power ofthe .ani:r'
as the
c1culation
iius b L\c_ m do w i I IC' m i 1 'ii' i ho 1 '
oor
i qoo- ho 1 d i iground.
] ni
t'he second p3. ace the
tah].e determ:I. rest h max:L ri..imdept;
:iwhic!i the ship '.:ari safely
and-or with
ava:L lablelength (
In
the third
place the table
cani beused to
determine the
ml ni mum :1 eni:ith of cl-ia I n w :1 tIi wh :Lch ah :L p must be oq'..i :Lpped :1. niorder' to anchor :Lni a safe water depth
depth on
which thec aiculationi must be based depenids
very much on the type arid dimensions of the ship.
ri
important
Factis that
the
cha i. ni 1. onicith compr :Lsos i:LFo 3. 3. ow :i nq three parts
t11e
f:irst part beinig
the length
of the cateniary from
ti-ic anich:r si-iackie to
...eface
-
the
second part
the lenicjt.i...oiii thewater' su'iace to
6
the third
p.rt the length which
i-s measured from theerit.wice of
the h.wse p :1. pc, t.ioigh the i..wse p :i. pe,over the wirid1;ss to
;.point
n the chiri locker where
the erid of the ch.iri is secured
The first
arid second parts rev.r:Li:.1e 1erçjths be'se they
depend on
the w.ter depth , ].odirig
condition aridtrim of the
:1. I:
The third pert
is - f:i<cd leriçjth zriditis
obvious thatit
musL be lori eriougii to avoid Li ic _hiri bocomi.riq i.ijh in U i locker.
Heric to he
h].e to ci'.ul ...e the minimum lenqth oF chiru
w:Lth wh :Lch . ship -must b eq'.iipped the ía 1 low i rig dt .nre 'e.qu:i. r'edsafe wziter depth
in order to calcu.izite the cteru.ry
:1.enqt
the b;il ]. st corid:Lt ion nud trim to c;. 3. cuJ. .:ite the 3. ::rith
of chi ri from the water sur f;.ce to the ç%y1'r
f
h;5:iwse pipe;I:re f ixeci 1nigtii
The
;i.
end ofthe chini
vL...ie water' su F;ice .:Lsofollows from the
cteriry equtioris .
By ddirig toth:is force
tfrie 1 inc fov'cc oF he].ençjth of cheiri from the wziter sur f;iceto the
chai ni stopI:er or bv' ke of the wi nid1ss t1e f':Dr'c or both items :i.s foundLip to- now the m.ixi rum ho idi rug power of tiie anichor is entered
into
I-jc.icu1tion
rid:it:Ls deinicd
thzit in
offully devioped cateniry
eqiiilibrium exists between the
han--zorita 1 component Fh arid tlie hold i rig power of the anchor,± ch on
:i.ts turn I
ckperidentn tli
SC)- 1 cC)nidi t :1. OTiSTherefore to -coriip.1ete the. problem, the Forces cierierated by
wi rid, c'jrrenits arid waves wh :1. ch can act or
sh I p-.:ticc:r
m'jst be addresse:IF.e fore address :1. nc; the .nfl i.erce
cf the
ertv :i. rorime.nta]. cond :1.t i cnis on a ship at archor some atteriti on 1 1 be pa :1 dl: a the
i:art of the ciia :L ri in the mass-spri riq system shi :i. Ti
The mass-spring
ystem ship-chain
It w.s showri
that the ship at anchor
must he considered as adynamic system which means
that ti-c
ship at ari.:hor ri berepresented by a mass--spring syst em . The mass compr:i.ses the mass.of the ship arid the chain . The spring constant depends on
the prOperties cf the
hinu nid is rJefiniedi:
(1)
wl-iere
F is
the force
increment produced by the displacementarid the symbol k denotes the spring cariist-arit which can be
:Lir,er or nonlinear.
The spr irig constant
for the
richor cha i. ri 1:0 liows from the - fore.e--d:Lspiacement plot which is constructedwith the aid
ofthe
data of
the fully
dev1oped cateriary arid '.jitim:ite slack case . F :1 guI-c no 3 shows the f'.j 1 i y dcvç I oped catcri.:ry ari:j.timate slack case
for two
types of cha:in . The data c)f the ci-ia:i.ris ar'c q:iveri in table rio . 2By d:i v : d:i rig -(is? d:i.
:La11rt:iiItcD :>arts
:i t s pos-.:i. i::L caiL-ci iaLe for
caclr part ti-ic Force Fh i'hc esu 1 ts c:f t1i icu1t. on
are tiiTi
p :i. otted on the i:asi s where the cl-ia in is fl. Lm- L-e slaci' Thrsi ilt
s si iowri ii Fi. j' ir iO arid show..that the spring cc)ristanit is riorii.iniear.
lii a similar mariner
as is done -ía...ic force-disp].acemerit plot an eniergy-di sp 1. acemerit plot can be conistr'.jctcd . TN i s :1. s al sodone
in figi.ire rio, 4.
It
can he shownthat this
curve is the
area uride...ic force<:l:i. si: 3. acement curve . This exp 1 ains ...similarity between both curves.
flie fiqure No. 4 shows that due to the di ffererice in mass the
energy stored :1 ri the
U 3 ti1 n is io'..ci'thari I nu the
LJ2 clia :1 ri 1i ir 'ii;i I Ti djt; urc rj yen .i Ti T.b1 c no riO ' Ti ii S rnc iTu t1 i-L fc.nti-ic choice a f--a ctiairi an eva :LuJatic:r1 between the r-e:Ti.j:i rx:i- force
arid erucrqy is required
Tii eriercJy method is a use ful tool ta compare the ± Ti-F]. ijeruce a-F
tiie ho 1 di rug power
of the
anchor to ti-ic erucrqy tc-rèd In ti-ccl-ia-in .
This is done in
f:i..:p..ire TiO .The ericrçjy nietiiod is riot new as it was r.sed by Maddox i1 J for ti-is des I qni of sin le po:i. nit moor i rigs arid can be ijscd
success--fully to assess an anchor arid chain combination.
t.
0
FULLY DEVELOPED ANCIIORLINES GRADE (J2 AND U3
MUTtJAIJLY COMPARED AT TIlE SAME HORIZONTAL FORCE
maximum displacemenL --0 20 40 60 80 100 .120 140 160 180 200 220 240 M 188
-I
l . 216 Figure no.3 U2 tJ2 U3 U3 Si M 30 20 10- - - kN
-.-FORCE/DISPLACEMENT AND ENERGY-DISPLACEMENT DIAGRAM
kNrn
-5 10 15 20 25 30
m
horizontal displacement
1000 800 600 .1 400 200 0
THE FORCE/DISPLACEMENT CURVES OF AN U3 CHAIN WITH HOLDING POWER OF 412 kN AND 926 kN
differene in displacement 1.34 m
difference in pptential energy : 841 kNm
10 15 20 25 in displacement Figure No.5 b 27,19 926 k 25,8S 30 E kNin 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 .5 0
Tzbie rio 2
( 1. inckJ. = 27, 65 m)
fully &veIoped
teriry
Terisi].e i meI.e
proof ic,d
brekirig lo.id
rnss
1 FF in
proof 1od
! in.
brekirig load
Poteriti.i Energy,
a
9
wter depth 30 méteP
1.J3 N/mm 2
'9(1()
mm 90 kN 2920 31.60 kN 6090 4.500 kg/rn 189 :1.62. kN 926 26degrees
18, 2 15,8 rn 188, 0 216, 3 rn :L84,' 21.3,5 kN 974, 0 962, 0 33,.3 3O, 4 23. 8 21., 3 number 6, 8 7, 8 kNrn 2337 2094Cy Cm 4 to +0.8 +0.6 + 0.6 CX +0.2
fo
-0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -08 - to 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 oi +0.05 + 0.04 +0.02 -0.02 -0.06 -0.06 a 0.08 - 0.10 - 0.12 -0.16 -0.15 -14-20 1.0 5Q.;s 00 120 11.0 160 180 2 -....-.
0 20 40 60 8O100 120 11.0 160 180 200-I
- - I r - - I I I - -. 20 40 60 80.. 100 120 11.0 160 180 2AG. 6 Wind Load coètflcteflts
0 00 I botLosted VLCC LNG - corner LPG - corner
Windcoeficients
31aauw(ij.)method/institute ship type
BSRA I I I
-- -
(sherwood--NSMB
Rernery. v..Oortm.-
DHL
- OCIMF -0.18 0WIND-,CURRENT-,WAVE AND HORIZONTAL CHAINFORCE ON A SHIP AT ANCHOR Figure no.7 J wind force. Fc current force Fg : wave force horizontal component chain force V velocity ship length between per.pendicularS breadth a,b coordinates hawse pipe Xg coordinate centre of gravity Course angle attack.waV : 4ind angle w e angle current C
From a design
point of view
the coo diriate b
is of
:i.riterest becauseit
.uses
a shearing
effect. This is
especially the
caste
for ships where the hawse
piles are located far from the
centre
line of
the sh. p . TherefcDre the moment cai.ise'.:I by thelocation
of
the
entrance
of ti-ic hawsepipe
cannot beriegic ted.
By
-piaciriq the
ship
in
a numberof
different orientations
around the
estin ted course of the
equilibrium position
the
forces
rid moment can he calculated.
In the study
by BrinikE 1on which this
paper is based a
num-ber of calculations were done
to:investa.gate tiue
:Lnufl'..IeTice ofwind, current arid wave
drift forces on a lanikcer,
a bul kcarr:i.crand a container ship at anchor.
Figure. no . 8 gives
the outcome of
a clijlaton
For' a J.oadedtanker which the
e .imatced dimens:Lonis were :310 m x 47, 17 m x29 . 70 m x 18, 9 m . Inichors with holdiriq
capacity 6 arid
6 wereused . TI"ice cha :Lris had a d :L ameter' ':: :L37 mm arid :1:14 mm arid were
of U3 quality .
i..ierit
was :issi.jmced ...ic sh :1. p wasat
anchor i ri a reasoriab :L i-1 t?r?f.i
ariicracie
w th waves Ti-icwater depths were
assumed to he
1 . S arid 6times the
maxim'..imL oaded
dra ft
The :L :14 mm cha :1 ri wasbased on
the equ:i. pmerr!:number arid the. 137 mr
on the proposed method.
In this example it is assijmed that it is
possible to remain at
anchor' :i ni w i rid force B accord :1TiCs
to
the sca i.e
of Beai_j fort, acijrrenit of 2. 5 meters
per second (6 . S knots> in waves provided
the
cha in dimensionis
i. 37 mm aTId the anchorcan cjericratc a
holding power of
2210 RN which is about
2_0 % ofthe. breaking
load c t the
cha I1i The ...iter ci.:i :i. r wh:i :i. sl:ased or
ti-eqi..aipmenit number fai is
because there is little guararitcee
that
the anchor
wiii cii goes w:i. th that chal n can dienieratce much moreholding power ti-ian. 1200 RN
For the. dynamic motiors in
the
hc:rionital
plane
a moreadvanced ca icu ].at :Loni method :15
required
Tb 1:s .Ls rio problembecai.se the
state oF
the art
at present
:Lssuch that
welknown model bas:Lnis arid iristitijtces ear iianidice the problem
t.astJ. y th fol 1 owi rig two ± ten. are
of 1nit?rest .
The f :1 :1ti-ic :Lmpact Impact occi.jrs when the sh:Lp :Ls si.rg I rig, sway :1 rig
arid yawl rig .
The second i> ...dynamic force which
15 1nt....duced
in tie
chain cable wi-icrthe ship
is heaving
, p:i.tciiriand rolling. Wilsoni[
indicates that fluctuations of
15 % oftiie i:rca k :1 rig loa:I of the chain are poss :11:>]. ce
in the end o F the
chair
t the water surface
i3oth :1 mpact arid ...ic
dynamic force
have to
be acc oi_lnited fc:rwi-ten ti"ic ci...i. n di mcenis Loris are detcerm:i. ned . Beca'.ise a di sci.jss:i. on
on these subjects Fails outside
the scope of th:Ls paper
t1cyare not Furtber addressed
Hav:i ri determ:i.red 1:he Force which .ani
i:e cxi ected
... ic0f the anchor cha :1 ni ijfldt(.?r van oi_is enivironimenta I cu..id:i. t . onis::he
strength aspect of
ti-ic anchor i rig system can now be adch'cessed-12
Th:Ls will be. done jr two parts. lThue
f:i.rst part will deal
withthe
hairi arid the seiorid with the windlass,
Strength aspects of the 'anchor chain.When evluatirucj the Lrericith of
the chain it must i:e realised
that- the-iain is the
coririectori between the anchor on seaLdarid
the wi.ridlas
which is p].aced on theiecastie
of the
shi.p Wi-ic ri tinder e treme weathc.r t:oridi ki r.ri i IC aricho'i
is
I C.) t'ied IC) 1 Is ma i mi im hol di ni. po 'or' thero mi i'.> L c' ' if I i ' CTit
safety in
the chain to preventit from
'breakirie undercorr-stanit, variable or impact load.
Neither is the link
orshack--lé,
which rests or the chafini
1 :Lp of the 1-awse pipe, allowed to de fc:rmor hrek
The. same app]. :i.es to a 1.1 1 :i niks arid shack 1 eswhich form part of
the chain . Lastly ti-ic brake of the wirid].assis
riot allowedto slip arid
both the windlass arid the chain s:)pper, I f fitted, must have su ff1 c:Lcnit-strenijthi to wi thstnid
11] 1od
1 ii mc.'aIis (h I II ic. d ernn ft i on c I c' d IIii 1I OTuof the arieior, cha :1 ni, bra ke, stopj:)er arid wi rtdL 1 rite... e3tcd . It also means th ....he des:i.ciri of thies parts must be
art the sanie strength considerations .
Fu rte':c:rc
the ii;nI:e the hawse p :Lpe enitr;;:inuce arid the cha f :i. nic.J l:i.p m'st beccith SO that- a :1:1 rik or' e wh :1 :1 s:in contact w :Lth t:he
chafi niq 1 ip cannot be de irrnod when under' 3. ::ad The same app 1 1 G?.St a thiC? WhO 1 C f:)ath F the ci"ia :i. ri t-h' ouçjh Fhe hawse p :1. pe. over the wi nidlass. , thro'.çih the chain p1 p.c :i. rita the chain 1C:cker'
i: ti. s i mp.ortanit to exam:Lnue
the strength
spe't s of
ttie r..h;:i :1 ri i 'anicIc:in C:.;m;\ c: f i.iia :1 ri ar'I :1 ci..i I .nir's i ric to t::::ii O.
a chain n niufacturer :15 i Vent I ri tab I rio , 3 .
l'i-ie table siioW
that
imp rovernenit:ini:ul :ity
from LJ$ to U3results in a h :Lgher tens I i.e strength arid reduced mass per unti
3. cngth . The proof 3. c)aci of tiie U2 cha:i. r :1 s 71 , 6 % arid that C)
the 1J3 chain 70 % of the l:reakinug load
'.'i-ert (:-)Iipau'ei:i i:c) thie I-uol:i:L nicj po'..er C:) f thie ant':.h cr the 3. ..:j. nu
...i:iu.ies are fci..irud
:i: f.'j ass_med that the ratio i-ia 1 di nq power' liass is 4 :1 nu idea].
SC:) :13. conid :1 t:ic:ris .
I'ci
Uu i :i.t ía L .iows ...at ti-ic estimatedholding power is
( 4 .x. 1.0500 kc .X 9, 80 rn/sec2 ) / 1000 6:12 kN
Hence :10 % of the breakinicj load of the U2 and 9, 15 % of the LI3
chair . Thiese percentages arc very low arid mean a
large satety
:1 ri acja :1 rust breakage
:i: i an anchor i. th irup.ro.'ed ho .Ld:. rig pOW.?r is used arid a ver'y h:i.
atio
of 1-2 is assumed £ 'J then the es... mated hal d:i. rugpower IS:
F kN 0
23
4 5 LOADED'AR1N TANKER 120 25 ii i2 3U 3'S B U FO AT u/sEc w I n d NOR T H sea ii0° current 1 80° 25 rn/swind.:N0RTH
Current 180 2.5 rn/s/
-/
d: 28.35 d113.40 m U3 137 mm 114 mm / 10 20 30 40 50 8 K C UR S I 0 N 60 7.0 80Fi'qure no.8
90 m HPF 7 q 0 I0 5 I0 4/
2400 1800 1200, 800Hence for the U2 chair. 22, 6 % arid the U3 ch.ini 20, 6 of the
brezk:i nc Lo.id
Tbie
no.3Data refer to equipment number 3600
i000 i
parti.lars chair.
item dimensions
13
Tcse v
:i. :.jes :1 rd :i. cate that a h icjh ho 1 di r. power' ... t- iLs-es th
st rerjth propert:i es a f the cha I Ti bette...er ar i:::orive:Lori.a 1 arucIior
Th:is c;<;;:imp].e si--,o..'s ..he riee.J
fc.r a careFul choice oi-thehoid
'..'or c F U to richor ni I ni1 y ñ c - I Ly p ri t- D -Frcm a pa i nt a f view a-I st'?rt:ith
Force. or. the windlass, brake and chain stopper
For ti-ue caicijiationi
of the. force
or. ttp
windlass, brake arid ia :i ri itoppe... fain-' wh :i ch I"iese :1 tems are used whci-iCal iriçj to anchor vs id:i. riçj at anci-av' arid we:LgI" :i.niçi .irici-i(:n' ave to be addr'essed They are the foil ow i r.
cIrc)l: -itie anchor -Fv'om a cev't.riiri Ici.Tht above seabed ar,d tl-eru hold tIie cha :L r wIth thz. brn ke when t1ie
iici-iov' :1. or. he cde'J , i'idIuaJ. 1 y pay Out ICi' ch.i:LTi
ut :L 1 :L s :1. riçj t:hc: brake wh :1 1st- back i ri' the sh :Lp iri.: '-.1 it :i iiate :i y cuv'i rvj .he cIta:i. ri w i. th (h
L'a e
wi--inisu ffi
e.j ent chainis paid
outto hold
t he ship in :1 t:L c:)risufFicient power' wal k L-he anchor out Lo a :1. i--i
dei:tIi arid Lr-T.ris Icr tite load to the br-: ke ther-, drop
t-e. .aTidI-ic)r' and br:i. nc I.:i-e ;l-- :u p t(:) -aniccir as above
wi-er, we :i. qh i. nidi anchoi- trans -Icr the cl-ia i ri 1 -Ircm the
bri
the w :1. ridi ass, hc;.:vc short, break the .TrhOi' from the seabed so :1. 1 arid then heave ii'';
-F-li cr1. enit bi'a ke wer tori. dc- at ar .hoi' :1. r
eniv :L ror.menit-al cor.d:i. t:Lonis
U2 U3 Terisi le N/mm 2 690-640 690 mm 90 78
prooF ioid
k N 3 :L 60 i3v'e. k:iTiçj L kN 4090 4 50CJ m.Dss 1 35' 1421.4.
The four ways
in which the
wirid1zss is used
show the:Lmpor-t.ricE? 0+ propel' know ].edge C)f
the
Forceon the
brake aridwinsdl.ss. The same
ppi ics to the
ch;.iri stopper
which cni be
used to
re]. ieve the
wi ridi ss In th :Ls respect :i t shou 1. d heremembered
that
the mc ii ritthe stopper
is opened the. fi..i]. 1ch; in 1 oad is immedi ;ite ].y trr.s ferred to
br. ke(s is
mentioned hefoi'ethe
groi.ridt.ck].o
is sometimes
usedduring mooriri nud urimooririg nd
:iri rare iristrices
emer'çjericystops in close quarter situtioris cri he ecuted.
(2fter the .I:ove genier]. c)bservtionls on the use c:f
the cjroi.ridtckIe the hrke,
wiridi.ss arid ch;nin stopper wi :1 i be ;ddressed
in more det:i. 1
S showii ;bc:ve .(j.
br ke is
.rui mpo'.rt
p i.ece 0+ oqu i pmeritdur :L rig
the ijse
of the
rchor
arid chi.ri
T1i is is ;.i]. so high-1 :ighted in study by I3roo ks I: 2:i His stu:Iy ws pI'c:mj::.tod by ni
ccident i.
Ti the w :i. riter i ri 1981 when ;.ini peri;:inieTt Iv moo .-ed rIgc.rne
dri ft
in ervirc:mmenit;i cord itionil;less then the
st;:t:i.cdes :L qn conid:i. ti OTis ...ie :i rivEs....L c.t Loris were rot 1 :1. m :1. ted to :i qs
.s
; iso
rznge of ship ss:Lzes
were :1. nc 1....ded . From U-e p.:::irtc:
the
deals with
the :ehav.o'r'
c:t the winidI;iss
system
it is
obvious that
over the
year's :L nithe des i
ni ofw I rid]. ass 1 iniear' :1. rcroase of ca:L e
.'asadopt.::! .
The i'esu 1.wer'e t!-x 11 known prol)]. ems w :ith :he brake when iro;:p niçj
zini Thor
Frinic:Li11y the t:ime
it rEIu:Lr'es
to
p].y thc- brakea fter
brake re 1 ease arid ...ie coo f f :L :1 enit: c...1. ct Ion ofthe
!:r'a ke 1 :ini I rig wer'e the cause C)
f problems
The study a 1SC)ti-it peak 1....)ads of about 30% C)
f t!i
ia :1-h break i.nig 1 oa.::1 can beexpected when the brake is
su':fdeni lv app 1 :i. ed P 1 1 these prob 1.ems can be solved
by ftte marl.. tacturer's of the w :1 rid :i ass prov :1ed ho Is
çjiveni a prOper sot
0+des:Lqni criteria
wh:icl"i :inicl'..dehrkC app:L :1 cation - rates arid peak 1 oads
I ri the same pziI:er Brook
1o..:sbhatt he avrage
speed of a sJu :i whilst arichor:L rig can be found I:y eqi..iatiniçj the energy the cha:i. iican absorb to the
enuer''.y of the ship arid tI"ie enierqy inii:ut bytIio env :Lr:Dnimental for'ces on tlie sh :i.p
T1"ic :1 qni ci' :1. i::c:r' :i. a -F or the w I nd .is; . can I:e f'tid :i.ni
the ru I es
and re.iu 1. at: :Ic:nis For
cTst ruct ion an;:I
ci assi f icat :i. on ci -Fstee]. ships pi_ft]. :i. shed
by the
v...- :1. ous we). 1. known soc riot i esTak:i. rig those
of Lloyd' s
....eçj i.ster o-F shi pp :iniqas an
example: 13.1 the -Fo]. 3. owl ni:i data on w I nidl ass des icri cart be fC)iTi(l
The w:L rid 1 ass :i.
to
have si.. f-F ic I ent power to exert a cant :1 niuousdi_ty pi..]. 3. over a per:Lod Of :0 m:Lniutes ot
1.J2 crade chain 4:1., 68 cL2 J 113 grade cha:iri 66. 60 2
N (3)
:::: di arietor cha :i. ni in mm
fl
table rio 4-
the
va:L ues found fQr the ch;:i ii r17
Up to now
it has been shown that
it is. possible
to deter'm:Lriestati
ca]. ly arid dyriamica]. ].ythe force on the
anchorchain under
various
erivjrorimertal conditions. Ey
taking as startiriçj point
the reqi_i:i red ho lcti rig power of
the
anchor arid by i. nic].udinigimpa Loa Mid c ..iI' lo id '.JLi L I i r_ ri bc c
pricricod
dur ithe
depi.oymerit of theanchoring system at is quite possihi.e to
design a good system.Having set
out whatis
expected of the ar!chor
sy ..cm :it is now
possible
toiàmpare
the method used
at present
with the one
irs.._hi _paper wh:i. ch :i. s based c:m the hc):icii rig power of
tiie nichor arid tiie crivirónimenitai loads
Comparison of the present day and proposed design criteria
Ti-ic peserit day desigri cr :Lter:La
of the
;rc:!"or :1 rig yI.om :Lsbasd
on ic ca]. cul;±ion
01 i-c cqt.iip.r1E?nt ni_i b.ertii
tI-i :1.riu! her are
determi
ned the niunier arid mass oF anchors arid)
L1(C) ( ] 1 c-ni (ii di irnotor rid
ijrdc
o i. ti vi 1 i ni' I uiifor the bower anchors
Ti'ie geriei'a 1 ic)rm a f tIia number IsEquipment numl:x?r Dispi ' t2' . 1 fl 2
ore
I) :1 sp 1 ' td
:L acemerit ir metric tons
- . 2
raritvers
in m (S)2
(2 L..onigiti..idi...s;.i.1. (rea i m
Ti"se
p'cc:I des :i. cir
me'thod is based art ti-cfarce cxc -ted on
ti-ic clsa irs by the eriv :i 'orimerta.t FcD's h :1 ch act: or tIie ip t.Iieri aniciiored
The d:i.ffcrerice :1. r: both mct-Iiods cart best be .j udcicd From tab]. c
no . 7 . i ri the
table
the present
daymethod is
I rid i. cated asEC1U:ipmcnt iijmher method arid
the proposed
one as Force - meL-hod .-L umr i shows ti-sen ire ma I ri I w :1 tIi
the
:1r
ci :ivis Ioris requl red
for
the des;i.cin fl3. so across ...e f'er
isgi.esi c- Ti iu n.Tid n :
lculL
LOTSei.iilis
1 1, I Iship s
3. eniclth The cal umri :1. niput...di. cates which :1. terns ors'..:b-div :Ls :1 on is
required to obtai
ri output . Unmarked iarc not
needed
or irrelevant,
The compari sari :Lni tiic table SIiC)WS that tIie force methc)d Is the
more
nivo1ved one of tiie o
r- tab]. e a]. SC) shows t1at the e:'dlu :1. jrit nsi.jmber method does rsc:)t
g:Lvc any cju :1.dance on the
forces
which have hedealt
wi ti-iijnidIer various environmental cond:Ltionis nor is any çjuidarice
g:i.vers On the hal...I :1 n ;:awcr' oF the anchor ri-e metI-io::i i:ss :Lca :i.:Ly
dctcrm:inies ...ic anciior wc:Lcht arid the stud 3. :i. ri k cha I ni on tIic
m.ic !.:hcti' arisversc
arid part oF
the I org :i ti_id :i nsa1.area oF
sh:ip
Tii force meti-sod :i.s more spec I Ii c
beca'isc it
requires a cal
env irorimerit1 corid i. ti oris when . si-up is anchored :i.ri ;.
cert. in
depth of ter . B;ised on tha force, the ho 1 di riq pwev'
of the
anchor, thed imeris ions of the ch.ai ri, the des igru o the w :L
iid-].ass, brake arid cha:i.ri stopper are based, FIeri'
the design of
t-he w i rid 1 ass, brake arid cha i ri stopper :L squite di f ferrit
I::othat according to the eqLi:Lpmerit number method which ori:Ly deaJ.s with the cont :1 nuous duty pu 1 1, short
term pull
arid anchorbreak out pull
s mentioned befpr
it is pri.ncipa].ly the lack of
informationori
the holding power of the
rucIior arid ....ie wh :L ch cart be expected on the archoririg system which prompted this p.apei' .is
howri in the ompar:L sort the origin of that lack ofiriforma--t lou, I ii ] V] L1 Ic.aI' t I te s 1c op Li on o I I L[ 1hc
iresenit day dcs:Lgni i:iethod wI-i-icl"i takes rio accoi..irt of the
enivi"-rorimental forces or holding power of the anuclior
Reomrnendations and conclusiori5
E?.e fore '.:kI'ess :1 TICI *:he v'ecommenijti C)nis arid c:)r;c ii...1. OnuS :i. i. 1
:1. miJL ru: .1:ç
that ijp
i:o the time the d :Lmeris loris of ...dramat :f. ca 3. 3. y I nicreased the use. of the ef.:Ii..r.L pment number seemed
suff:Lcierit fo...te des-igru of the anchoring 5y5Ifl
of a
clianiL...tipis a
result of the trac ic
aicc:Ldenit w :L ththe m/t
Maass3. i_i is Wil :1 ct-i prompte:I the study on archor :1. rig systems, the atterut ion was foc..isedor the fTact...t for the
desi ri :) fan anchor-i rigsystem rio attenit :L on :Ls paid or the holding power of the anchor or the' enivi. ronimenitai. +orces which act on the sh:i. p at aricho...
This is very much in
conitradictior to what is
riorñiai p'ac tiseTi LI . Ic. (lii r I ,J to moo TtrJt ñ3 LI ioi 'I i LI i I fio '3 1
there , i
is riot applied
... te des:ign of art anchori rig system of a merchant. sIi I p . ls the proposed method Is nuotiu i rig new thesole 1:ilr' pose of ti-I is paper :i.s çj draw tiuc attenut :i. on to the omi ss :1 on of the ho 1 d:ing power arid env :Lrc:)nimenitaJ. forces ± ni the
design arid urge designiers to adapt tIi force method
-The qizcsti on immed :1. atel y ar :i ses what
to do wIth
the e.qui pmenit number.TI-ic answer arid recommendation ±5;
use dur I rg a trans itioni period the equiprnenit number
after
transition period
the force method shoi..ildbe required for newly built vessels;
...ge owliers of exist I rug SI"ii ps to detei'm:L re the
capac--i ty of the
anchor :inig system of their ships arid m.:i keti-ic data -zva :i 1 abJ. e to the sI"u :i. p's
rIi conicL us :iar
:i s 'd-at the stal:e of tlic art is
such that it I
feasi Ic to
desi ini ar anchor I nici system w:i. th the force mcthc:darid to make the data a-ia i lab ic to the sh :Lp' s st.a fl in this way
cniliaric ± rig the safety of the ships' s at anichor
Tibi no.?.
DESICN COMPARISON
I tem Equ iprnert number
Foo mt"od
method
Output Input Output SHIP' s DT 1 . 1 length
1.2 dr.ft
i.3 t'ariv .
.zi
1.4 lorigit.
1 . 5 is
1 . 6 iisi morn rit
Tiert 1. ; 1 .7 heiht bow in l;.st ..,'iti I 1 c;.t :i on 2 DE3IcN ROflDS 2 :L o:i 1 cIat.:i 2 . 2 '..ter depth 3 ENVIRONMENTPIL DPiT(i 3. 1 w:ind 2 .... 3.3 waivc .4 DE.SIGN CONDITIONS 4. 1 surv1vL1. 6 . 2 c: '.ticr-; I S COEFFICIENTS S 1 ii ridfoi'c 5 2. '..Irni c:)':': 3 di' :i. ft
FORCE: CLCU!JiT IONS 6 w :1. nid 1.1,1.3,1.4,.
3.1,6, 5.1
. x windforce 6 2 uront:2
3' . ii.i.1-fo'c 6.3 ve drift 1.1,4 9,3 . wave drift 6 . 6 .:t.:Ln t:it:-:.'. pzrt I 3, 4, 6 . 1 6.2,6.3 x6.5 chziri
dyrimipErt
1 .8, 1. 6, 4., dyrirn:L 6 . 1, 6 2, 6 3 xch.iri 1:cr
7 ANCHOR H7.1 holding PowP
/2.4,6.4,6.. 5
holding
rnss
xmss
rii.imbr' x r'.imhv' -w i.ght-r'oc!i..je:t . on du::L: :i. Oh
S CIIAIN. 8. 1
1rigtli
totzLl. :I.OrCTtI :L . 7, 1.8, 2, 2, 6.4, 7. 1S . 2 iss
S . 1 irid ri'c.ly h;.::i. i8.3 cnde
7.1,8.2
x9 )INDi._ASS, I3RA I<E, cIIA:i:N STOF'F-'ER
- ri'jrnhr
w i rid 1 .ss
1. C)Tit :i rIi..IOuS i.:Iuty
d:i.am har:i. ri Corit . Duty
9 . 2 short term
iu 1 1 (5 . T . P) 9.1. sT.!::, 9 . 3ek. out
pull
(13.0, P) 7 . 2, S :1. , ci :i. ;.i m !3.O.P.9 4 ct:i'ztiori;.ul/
s'rv :1. v; 1 ci y (0 . S . C))4, 6.4,6.5
x05.0
9.5 Br.ke
itri c:ti.:LTi -6, 6 . 4, 6 . -5 x1od
9. 6 c:lu;ii:iri -stopp.r 4, 6.4., 6 5 :Lcd9 . 7 :oritroi system
4,6.4, 6.5,
9 1, Q!5 1-7 . 2 7 . 3 7 . 4length
ijrit
1 eriithReferences
1 lri
erier.y b.sis
for
the design of operr-oce;ri s:i.niglepoint mooriri<
Notley Roger Maddox
Esso ProdUtiori Rerh Co
OTC pzper ro 15362. The. dyrimi Behaviour of Single arid
Multiple
MooredVessels
Brook, 3 S'.', M . Sr.. .ind 0 . Byriie B ft. S,
Foper no.9
3 on ship J. :L ries in vesond :rrerit... I3si 1 W . W:i isori, F . is.e
rud Dorzld 1b;i:io
.:rji_jv'n1 oF the oi.r's di vi si or
of the
tier:L:.r Sci:::iety of Civ:. :i Ei:Lniee'.:Novem'er :L969
A. t)'weg I nqeni b :i j L
crtwer'per vr
:irC. F.M. Rery en E.G. Kr!..ithof
S G:'ri W
40e. ji'g;r
19735 , The role of model tests .nid ...eli' o rr el;.t:Lor with Fi..il I
oziie observtioris
Dr. Ir. J. H. VugtsSymposi urn on "0 ffshore hydrc:Jyri.nii.:s
'.jcp.st :1971
I<eriiri.:eri The Nethei:rds
6. Wutcr'3.00pkuridig ithoratorium . Nau.jt Ical cC(i tr:i.butioni
ru LL/Jr Lcd 'or I: d 1.ejni H C ' i iw J W Ku i iii
.3 . Stratirig PuLI ic.ijtiori rio 251., febi'uari 1981
Gu I del i rue; arud 'econierudat :Loris For sa moor inig o ]. arge ships at p :L ers arid sea is lards
.Oi 1 compariies Initer'riat lanai M.:r' :L re FOrum
...Pç :i.c)nis al .: i. rid and cu.jrrent I C)i.dS on
II!( I
OCIMF
T.I.!; ICJt'9..iC)I..! .
linri:Lng ;nrid s:i.gni c)1
rrici
.-iri::- tev'ir.s
John Wiley nid Loris
9 . T.rik. .rid L')i. rid turirue 1 tests For' ;.i di' I I ]...h. p. with CIyTIm I i
position contrOl
C). fl. Wise, CEC Electr:i.c;:ul. Pro jects I i m:i.ted
arid .:i . W . Eruql :1 sh, N;.t ioru]. F'hys :1 c;. I Lbor;tory
paper OTC 2345, May 1975
:10 .
Principles of Naval
riI:it:e.jr'e ('evised) Ed.tor .Johri
FI o....I I I L uc.d by f. uo r I I y I N v. flr'. I
aiucl Mar' :i. rue Eni I rueers 1%é.7
Het be.)J.c?ri v.fliI d:' ::.TiC:d::.t::;'.1e leri':;to :iTke'ket(:.ruci cor
ru ten .:uTIer' L iav':u.:ig
12 I...'.isrè <.Swc.dish) Ar:hor' i.Ii i ri
13. L.. 1 oyd' s rej: tï' C) f sha. pp iriçj . Rules .md reçiul ;t (DTIS