Reza Sarkhosh
Reza Sarkhosh
S
S
h
h
ww
ii
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
s
s
i
i
s
s
t
t
a
a
n
n
c
c
e
e
o
o
f
f
R
R
e
e
i
i
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
c
c
e
e
d
d
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
t
t
e
e
B
B
e
e
a
a
m
m
s
s
w
w
i
i
t
t
h
h
o
o
u
u
t
t
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
i
i
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
c
c
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
S
S
u
u
s
s
t
t
a
a
i
i
n
n
e
e
d
d
L
L
o
o
a
a
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
s
s
i
i
s
s
t
t
a
a
n
n
c
c
e
e
o
o
f
f
R
R
e
e
i
i
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
c
c
e
e
d
d
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
t
t
e
e
B
B
e
e
a
a
m
m
s
s
w
w
i
i
t
t
h
h
o
o
u
u
t
t
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
i
i
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
c
c
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
S
S
u
u
s
s
t
t
a
a
i
i
n
n
e
e
d
d
L
L
o
o
a
a
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
Reza Sarkhosh
A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Faculty of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Department of Structural Engineering,
Concrete Structures Delft, the Netherlands
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
s
s
i
i
s
s
t
t
a
a
n
n
c
c
e
e
o
o
f
f
R
R
e
e
i
i
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
c
c
e
e
d
d
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
t
t
e
e
B
B
e
e
a
a
m
m
s
s
w
w
i
i
t
t
h
h
o
o
u
u
t
t
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
i
i
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
c
c
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
S
S
u
u
s
s
t
t
a
a
i
i
n
n
e
e
d
d
L
L
o
o
a
a
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
Proefschrift
ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft,
op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.C.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties,
in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 17 april 2014 om 15:00 uur door
Reza SARKHOSH
Master of Science in Civil/Earthquake Engineering,
Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)
Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof.dr.ir.Dr.-Ing. h.c. J. C. Walraven
Copromotor: Ir. J. A. den Uijl
Samenstelling promotiecommissie:
Rector Magnificus, voorzitter
Prof.dr.ir.Dr.-Ing. h.c. J.C. Walraven Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Ir. J. A. den Uijl Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof.Dr.-Ing. H.W. Reinhardt University of Stuttgart
Prof.dr. A. Muttoni Ecole Politechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Prof.dr.ir. D.A. Hordijk Technische Universiteit Delft
Prof.dr.ir. J.G. Rots Technische Universiteit Delft
Dr.ir. A. de Boer Rijkswaterstaat
Prof.ir. A.Q.C. van der Horst Technische Universiteit Delft, reservelid
ISBN 978-94-6108-645-7
Copyright Ⓒ 2014 by R. Sarkhosh
All rights reserved. No part of this material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, without the prior written permission from the author.
S
S
u
u
m
m
m
m
a
a
r
r
y
y
Shear failure of reinforced concrete (RC) beams without stirrups is an instantaneous brittle failure mode and is complicated by the behaviour of inclined shear crack, aggregate interlock and dowel action. The time-dependency of shear-critical beams is even more complicated by the effects of creep and shrinkage, development of concrete strength, crack opening displacements, creep of bond and stress redistribution in the RC member. In this research, a set of tests on plain and reinforced concrete beams is presented together with numerical analyses, in order to describe the behaviour of concrete members subjected to long-term sustained loads. Additionally, a model is proposed for predicting the shear capacity of RC beams without stirrups, including the effect of aggregate interlock and considering the time effects.
An experimental investigation that focused on the time-dependency of flexural cracks in concrete beams under sustained loads is carried out on small-size plain concrete beams with a notch. The load intensity (λ=Psus/Pu) is chosen between
0.72 and 0.89. The time to failure shows a logarithmic relation to the load intensity. The crack opening rate is simulated by an analytical model based on elasto-viscoplastic (EVP) behaviour for the prediction of the crack growth under long-term loading. In order to predict the corresponding time to fracture and with reference to the experimental data, an empirical expression is given for the crack opening limit. Based on this expression, the critical strain of the concrete at crack initiation is determined. Furthermore, a finite element model is employed in order to study its suitability for the simulation of time-dependent phenomena and to verify the results of the proposed EVP model.
The long-term behaviour of concrete under sustained loads is modelled by means of a bulk creep function (outside the fracture process zone). Under long-term
loading, the strain due to the creep effect in the high stress zone around the fictitious crack tip may be large enough to reach the critical strain, so that crack formation can occur below the static tensile strength. To that end, the criterion should be adjusted to account for the time effect.
Additionally, the model of Gastebled & May (2001) for the prediction of the shear resistance of concrete beams without stirrups is modified by introducing a bilinear crack pattern with special attention to the aggregate interlock mechanism. The proposed model is validated against 393 experiments and compared with the recommendations by ACI 318-08 (2008), BS 8110 (1997), Eurocode 2 (2005), Model Code 2010 (2013) Level II approximation as well as the analytical models presented by Bažant & Yu (2004), Gastebled & May (2001) and Xu et al. (2012). However, the prediction of shear resistance under sustained loading according to the model with bilinear crack pattern comprises a complicated model with time-dependent parameters. Therefore, in order to present the effect of each parameter on the shear resistance of the beam, a discussion is given on the shear resistance under sustained loading and the time-dependent parameters in this model.
Lastly, a series of experiments on shear-critical concrete beams without stirrups is conducted in order to investigate the sustained loading effects. The results of 28 short-term monotonic tests and 14 long-term sustained loading tests under high load intensity (load intensity between 0.83 and 0.98) are given. Time-dependent deflections, surface crack pattern, stress redistribution, crack length development and crack width development are studied and discussed based on the observation during the tests. In addition, the shear resistance of the concrete beams is tested at the end of the desired period of sustained loading, in order to investigate the influence of sustained loading on the final shear resistance.
S
S
a
a
m
m
e
e
n
n
v
v
a
a
t
t
t
t
i
i
n
n
g
g
Bezwijken op afschuiving van gewapend betonnen balken zonder schuifwapening treedt plotseling op en wordt gekenmerkt door een bros karakter. Het is een gecompliceerd mechanisme, waarbij aspecten als het gedrag van een schuine afschuifscheur, scheurwrijving en deuvelwerking van de langswapening een rol spelen. Het tijdsafhankelijke gedrag is zelfs nog complexer door de effecten van kruip, krimp, de toename van de betonsterkte, de verplaatsingen van de scheurvlakken ten opzichte van elkaar, de aanhechtingskruip en de uit deze invloedsfactoren resulterende herverdeling van spanningen in het gewapende element. In dit onderzoeksprogramma zijn experimenten uitgevoerd op ongewapende en gewapende betonnen balken. Verder zijn numerieke analyses uitgevoerd, met als doel het bezwijkgedrag van betonelementen, onderworpen aan een langdurig aangrijpende belasting, te beschrijven. In aansluiting daarop is een model ontwikkeld om het afschuifdraagvermogen van gewapende betonbalken zonder schuifwapening te voorspellen, met speciale aandacht voor de effecten van scheurwrijving en tijdsafhankelijke vervorming.
Een experimenteel onderzoek naar het gedrag van buigscheuren in betonnen balken onder langdurige belasting is uitgevoerd op kleine betonbalken met een kerf. De verhouding tussen de langdurig aangebrachte belasting en de bezwijkbelasting bij snel toenemende belasting lag tussen 0.72 en 0.89. De tijd tot bezwijken bleek een logaritmische functie van deze verhouding te zijn. De snelheid van scheuropening kan worden beschreven op grond van een analytisch model, gebaseerd op het elasto-visco-plastische gedrag van het beton onder langdurige belasting. Om de corresponderende tijd tot breuk, in overeenstemming met de experimenten, te kunnen bepalen is een empirische uitdrukking voor de kritische scheuropening afgeleid. Gebaseerd op deze uitdrukking, kan de kritische rek in het beton bij scheurinitiatie worden bepaald.
Verder is de geschiktheid van een eindig elementen model onderzocht met betrekking tot het simuleren van de tijdsafhankelijke verschijnselen en het verifiëren van de resultaten van het voorgestelde EVP model.
Het langeduurgedrag van betonelementen onder langdurige belasting wordt gemodelleerd op grond van het kruipgedrag van het beton buiten het gebied waar de scheuruitbreiding plaatsvindt. Onder langdurige belasting kan de betonrek, als gevolg van het effect van kruip in de hoogbelaste zone rondom het scheuruitbreidingsgebied, groot genoeg worden om de kritische grenswaarde te bereiken, zodat scheurvorming op kan treden bij een spanning in het beton onder de korte duur betontreksterkte. Daarom moet het scheurcriterium worden aangepast om met het langeduur effect rekening te kunnen houden.
Vervolgens is het model van Gastebled en May (2001) voor het bepalen van het afschuifdraagvermogen van betonnen balken zonder schuifwapening uitgebreid door het introduceren van bilineaire scheuren, om hiermee het effect van scheurwrijving afdoende in rekening te kunnen brengen. Het voorgestelde model is gevalideerd aan 393 experimenten en vergeleken met de aanbevelingen volgens ACI 318-08 (2008), BS 8110 (1997), Eurocode 2 (2005), Model Code 2010 (2013) Level II benadering, en verder de analytische modellen van Bažant & Yu (2004), Gastebled & May (2001) en Xu et al. (2012). Niettemin is de bepaling van het afschuifdraagvermogen onder langdurige belasting met het model met bilineair scheurpatroon relatief gecompliceerd, gezien de tijdsafhankelijke effecten. Daarom is een parameterstudie uitgevoerd om de invloed van de tijdsafhankelijke parameters vast te stellen.
Tenslotte is een serie experimenten op betonnen balken zonder schuifwapening uitgevoerd om het tijdsafhankelijke effect op het afschuifdraagvermogen vast te stellen. Het afschuifdraagvermogen onder kortdurende belasting is vergeleken met het afschuifdraagvermogen onder langdurige belasting bij belastingniveaus tussen 0.83 en 0.98 van de korteduur sterkte. De tijdsafhankelijke doorbuigingen, scheurpatronen, spanningsherverdeling, scheurlengte- en scheurwijdte-ontwikkeling zijn geobserveerd en geanalyseerd. Aan het einde van de periode van langeduurbelasting is voor de niet op afschuiving bezweken balken de belasting tot breuk opgevoerd, om hiermee de invloed van de langeduurbelasting op het uiteindelijke afschuifdraagvermogen te bepalen.
T
T
a
a
b
b
l
l
e
e
o
o
f
f
C
C
o
o
n
n
t
t
e
e
n
n
t
t
s
s
S
S
u
u
m
m
m
m
a
a
r
r
y
y
... IIIS
S
a
a
m
m
e
e
n
n
v
v
a
a
t
t
t
t
i
i
n
n
g
g
... VT
T
a
a
b
b
l
l
e
e
o
o
f
f
C
C
o
o
n
n
t
t
e
e
n
n
t
t
s
s
... VIIN
N
o
o
t
t
a
a
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
... XIIII
I
n
n
t
t
r
r
o
o
d
d
u
u
c
c
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
... 1Background and Significance ... 1
Objective ... 4
Outline of the Research ... 4
C
C
h
h
a
a
p
p
t
t
e
e
r
r
1
1
:
:
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
s
s
i
i
s
s
t
t
a
a
n
n
c
c
e
e
o
o
f
f
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
t
t
e
e
B
B
e
e
a
a
m
m
s
s
w
w
i
i
t
t
h
h
o
o
u
u
t
t
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
R
R
e
e
i
i
n
n
f
f
o
o
r
r
c
c
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
... 71.1. Shear-failure modes in concrete beams without shear reinforcement ... 7
1.1.1. Shear-flexure failure ... 8
1.1.2. Shear-tension failure ... 9
1.1.3. Shear-compression failure ... 9
1.2. Contributions to the shear bearing resistance ... 9
1.2.1. Uncracked compression area ... 9
1.2.2. Aggregate interlock ... 10
1.2.4. Direct strut action for loads near to support (as/d<2.5) ... 14
1.3. Other effects to be considered when describing the shear resistance .. 14
1.3.1. Size effect ... 14
1.3.2. Bond of reinforcing steel ... 15
1.3.3. Effect of an axial force ... 16
1.4. Influencing parameters on shear resistance of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement ... 17
1.4.1. Concrete strength ... 17
1.4.2. Longitudinal reinforcement ratio ... 18
1.4.3. Shear span to depth ratio ... 19
1.5. Empirical relations ... 19
1.5.1. Eurocode 2 and CEB-FIP Model Code 1990 ... 20
1.5.2. Fib Model Code 2010 ... 20
1.5.3. ACI 318-08 ... 21
1.5.4. Canadian Standard (CSA) ... 21
1.5.5. British Standard ... 22
1.5.6. Rafla (1971) ... 23
1.6. Behavioural models for a reinforced concrete beam ... 23
1.6.1. Kani (1964) ... 23
1.6.2. Pruijssers (1986) ... 24
1.6.3. Reineck (1991) ... 26
1.6.4. Gastebled & May (2001) ... 26
1.6.5. Bažant and Yu (2008) ... 27
1.6.6. Xu, Zhang and Reinhardt (2012) ... 28
1.7. Summary of Chapter 1 ... 29
C
C
h
h
a
a
p
p
t
t
e
e
r
r
2
2
:
:
T
T
i
i
m
m
e
e
D
D
e
e
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
e
e
n
n
t
t
F
F
r
r
a
a
c
c
t
t
u
u
r
r
i
i
n
n
g
g
o
o
f
f
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
t
t
e
e
... 312.1. Properties of concrete in time ... 31
2.1.1. Compressive and tensile strength ... 31
2.1.2. Modulus of elasticity ... 33
2.1.3. Fracture energy ... 33
2.1.4. Strength under sustained loading ... 33
2.2. Time-dependent effects ... 34
2.2.1. Shrinkage ... 34
Table of Contents | IX
2.2.3. Relaxation ... 39
2.2.4. Bond creep ... 40
2.2.5. Crack opening and sliding ... 41
2.3. Summary of Chapter 2 ... 42
C
C
h
h
a
a
p
p
t
t
e
e
r
r
3
3
:
:
E
E
x
x
p
p
e
e
r
r
i
i
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
a
a
l
l
I
I
n
n
v
v
e
e
s
s
t
t
i
i
g
g
a
a
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
a
a
n
n
d
d
A
A
n
n
a
a
l
l
y
y
t
t
i
i
c
c
a
a
l
l
M
M
o
o
d
d
e
e
l
l
o
o
f
f
T
T
i
i
m
m
e
e
-
-D
D
e
e
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
e
e
n
n
t
t
C
C
r
r
a
a
c
c
k
k
G
G
r
r
o
o
w
w
t
t
h
h
... 43 3.1. Background ... 44 3.2. Test method ... 45 3.2.1. Specimens ... 453.2.2. Variables and derivatives ... 45
3.2.3. Experimental procedure ... 46
3.2.4. Curing condition ... 46
3.2.5. Compressive strength of the concrete ... 47
3.2.6. Measurement ... 47
3.2.7. Loading procedure ... 48
3.3. Experimental results ... 48
3.3.1. Test setup and equipment ... 48
3.3.2. Handling of experimental data ... 48
3.3.3. Measured displacement in short-term tests ... 49
3.3.4. Fracture energy ... 50
3.3.5. Measured displacements in long-term tests ... 52
3.4. Analytical model for crack growth ... 56
3.4.1. Elasto-visco-plastic model ... 56
3.4.2. Modelling of the present tests ... 58
3.5. Application of the EVP model for crack opening rate ... 63
3.5.1. Step-by-step method to employ the proposed model ... 63
3.5.2. Prediction of failure ... 64
3.5.3. Cracking strain limit ... 67
3.6. Comparison with other test results ... 69
3.7. Summary of Chapter 3 ... 70
C
C
h
h
a
a
p
p
t
t
e
e
r
r
4
4
:
:
M
M
o
o
d
d
e
e
l
l
l
l
i
i
n
n
g
g
t
t
h
h
e
e
C
C
r
r
a
a
c
c
k
k
G
G
r
r
o
o
w
w
t
t
h
h
i
i
n
n
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
t
t
e
e
... 714.1.1. Elastic-ideal-plastic model of Dugdale ... 72
4.1.2. Fictitious crack model of Hillerborg et al. ... 73
4.1.3. Crack band model ... 75
4.1.4. Two parameter fracture model ... 75
4.1.5. Effective crack model ... 77
4.1.6. Size effect model of Bažant ... 77
4.1.7. Conclusions ... 77
4.2. Assumptions of fictitious crack model ... 77
4.3. Nonlinear analysis by means of linear elastic fracture model ... 78
4.3.1. Time dependency of the FPZ ... 79
4.3.2. Finite element modelling ... 79
4.3.3. 2D beam in plane-stress ... 82
4.4. Modelling of monotonic short-term 3-point bending beam with flexural notch ... 83
4.4.1. Load-deflection curve of finite element analysis ... 84
4.4.2. Comparison of FE results and experiments ... 85
4.4.3. Effect of tensile strength on FE results ... 86
4.4.4. Effect of modulus of elasticity ... 88
4.4.5. Effect of softening function ... 89
4.4.6. Verification of the FE model ... 91
4.5. Modelling of long-term sustained loading (3-point bending) of a beam with a flexural notch ... 94
4.5.1. Development of strain in front of the notch tip ... 96
4.5.2. Verification with the experiments ... 99
4.5.3. Comparison of the results with the EVP model ... 99
4.6. Summary of Chapter 4 ... 101
C
C
h
h
a
a
p
p
t
t
e
e
r
r
5:
5
B
B
e
e
h
h
a
a
v
v
i
i
o
o
u
u
r
r
o
o
f
f
a
a
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
C
C
r
r
a
a
c
c
k
k
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
S
S
h
h
o
o
r
r
t
t
-
-
t
t
e
e
r
r
m
m
a
a
n
n
d
d
S
S
u
u
s
s
t
t
a
a
i
i
n
n
e
e
d
d
L
L
o
o
a
a
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
:
:
T
T
h
h
e
e
o
o
r
r
e
e
t
t
i
i
c
c
a
a
l
l
A
A
n
n
a
a
l
l
y
y
s
s
i
i
s
s
... 1035.1. Shear failure model with linear inclined shear crack ... 105
5.1.1. Depth of the compression zone under sustained loading ... 105
5.1.2. Shear resistance according to Gastebeld & May and Xu et al. 109 5.1.3. Shear crack under sustained loading ... 113
5.1.4. Effect of bond creep ... 114
5.1.5. Parametric study for a shear-critical beam under sustained loading ... 116
Table of Contents | XI
5.2. Shear failure model with bilinear inclined shear crack ... 118
5.2.1. Proposed model ... 118
5.2.2. Verification of the analytical results with experiments ... 123
5.2.3. Extension of the bilinear crack model to the case of sustained loading ... 127 5.2.4. Parametric Study ... 128 5.3. Summary of Chapter 5 ... 129
C
C
h
h
a
a
p
p
t
t
e
e
r
r
6
6
:
:
E
E
x
x
p
p
e
e
r
r
i
i
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
s
s
o
o
n
n
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
-
-
C
C
r
r
i
i
t
t
i
i
c
c
a
a
l
l
B
B
e
e
a
a
m
m
s
s
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
S
S
u
u
s
s
t
t
a
a
i
i
n
n
e
e
d
d
L
L
o
o
a
a
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
... 1316.1. Test arrangement and setup ... 132
6.1.1. Details of the reinforced concrete beams ... 132
6.1.2. Variables ... 133
6.1.3. Material properties ... 134
6.1.4. Standard compressive tests on concrete ... 135
6.1.5. Test setup ... 135
6.1.6. Deflection measurement ... 137
6.1.7. Crack width measurement ... 138
6.2. Test Programme ... 138
6.2.1. Short-term monotonic loading ... 141
6.2.2. Long-term sustained loading ... 141
6.3. Results of short-term monotonic loading ... 141
6.3.1. Type of failure ... 141
6.3.2. Shear resistance ... 145
6.3.3. Midspan deflection ... 146
6.3.4. Diagonal deformation ... 147
6.3.5. Crack pattern ... 150
6.3.6. Summary of short-term tests ... 150
6.4. Results of long-term sustained loading ... 156
6.4.1. Load intensity ... 157
6.4.2. Time-dependent deflections ... 158
6.4.3. Crack pattern ... 164
6.4.4. Crack length development in time ... 165
6.4.5. Crack width development in time ... 172
6.4.6. Stress redistribution in time ... 176
6.4.8. Summary of long-term sustained loading tests ... 188
6.5. Comparison of the experiments with the analytical model ... 189
6.6. Summary of Chapter 6 ... 194
C
C
h
h
a
a
p
p
t
t
e
e
r
r
7
7
:
:
S
S
u
u
m
m
m
m
a
a
r
r
y
y
a
a
n
n
d
d
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
l
l
u
u
s
s
i
i
o
o
n
n
s
s
... 1957.1. Summary ... 195
7.2. Conclusions ... 198
7.3. Recommendations for future research ... 200
R
R
e
e
f
f
e
e
r
r
e
e
n
n
c
c
e
e
s
s
... 201A
A
p
p
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
i
i
x
x
A
A
:
:
2
2
D
D
F
F
i
i
n
n
i
i
t
t
e
e
E
E
l
l
e
e
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
M
M
o
o
d
d
e
e
l
l
l
l
i
i
n
n
g
g
o
o
f
f
a
a
B
B
e
e
a
a
m
m
i
i
n
n
P
P
l
l
a
a
n
n
e
e
-
-
S
S
t
t
r
r
e
e
s
s
s
s
.. 217A
A
p
p
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
i
i
x
x
B
B
:
:
M
M
a
a
t
t
l
l
a
a
b
b
C
C
o
o
d
d
e
e
f
f
o
o
r
r
F
F
l
l
e
e
x
x
u
u
r
r
a
a
l
l
C
C
r
r
a
a
c
c
k
k
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
S
S
h
h
o
o
r
r
t
t
-
-
t
t
e
e
r
r
m
m
L
L
o
o
a
a
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
... 223A
A
p
p
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
i
i
x
x
C
C
:
:
M
M
a
a
t
t
l
l
a
a
b
b
C
C
o
o
d
d
e
e
f
f
o
o
r
r
F
F
l
l
e
e
x
x
u
u
r
r
a
a
l
l
C
C
r
r
a
a
c
c
k
k
u
u
n
n
d
d
e
e
r
r
L
L
o
o
n
n
g
g
-
-
t
t
e
e
r
r
m
m
S
S
u
u
s
s
t
t
a
a
i
i
n
n
e
e
d
d
L
L
o
o
a
a
d
d
i
i
n
n
g
g
... 233A
A
p
p
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
i
i
x
x
D
D
:
:
S
S
h
h
e
e
a
a
r
r
D
D
a
a
t
t
a
a
b
b
a
a
s
s
e
e
... 247A
A
p
p
p
p
e
e
n
n
d
d
i
i
x
x
E
E
:
:
S
S
t
t
a
a
n
n
d
d
a
a
r
r
d
d
C
C
o
o
m
m
p
p
r
r
e
e
s
s
s
s
i
i
v
v
e
e
T
T
e
e
s
s
t
t
s
s
o
o
n
n
C
C
o
o
n
n
c
c
r
r
e
e
t
t
e
e
... 257B
B
i
i
o
o
g
g
r
r
a
a
p
p
h
h
y
y
... 260N
N
o
o
t
t
a
a
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
Latin upper case letters
A1/2/3 Areas under load-deflection curve for measurement of fracture energy
Ac Concrete cross-sectional area
As Reinforcement cross-sectional area
C0(t,t0) Compliance function for basic creep
CRd, c Design factor to the shear resistance according to EC2
Cd(t,t0,tC) Additional compliance function for drying creep
Cf Aggregate effectivity factor
CMOD Crack mouth opening displacement COD Crack opening displacement CTOD Crack tip opening displacement CTODc Critical crack tip opening displacement
DD Diagonal deformation
E0 Modulus of elasticity of elastic element in EVP model
Ec Tangent (asymptotic) modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days
Ec(t) Tangent modulus of elasticity of concrete at time t
Ecm Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete at 28 days
Ecm(t0) Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete at time t0 of loading
Es Modulus of elasticity of steel
Fa Horizontal component of aggregate interlocking force
FS Tensile force in steel
FC Tensile force in concrete due to softening
GIf , Gf Fracture energy of concrete (Mode I)
GIIf Pure Mode II fracture energy of concrete
Gf0 Energy required to propagate a tensile crack of unit area
Gs Shear modulus of steel
H(t) Spatial average of pore relative humidity
J(t, t0) The compliance function that represents the total stress-dependent
strain by unit stress
Jve Viscoelastic creep compliance function
Jvp Viscoplastic creep compliance function s
Ic
K Critical stress intensity factor
KIIc Mode II fracture toughness according to Reinhardt & Xu (1998)
L Span length
Lꞌ Beam length
M Bending moment
M0 Cross-sectional moment resistance
Mcr Critical bending moment
Mu Flexural moment at ultimate state
N Axial force
Psus Sustained load
Pu Peak point in load-deflection curve (Ultimate load)
Pu,mean Mean value of the ultimate load
Q(t,t0) Approximate binomial integral for the aging viscoelastic term of
creep
Qf(t0) Approximate binomial integral for the aging viscoelastic term of
creep
R Radius of aggregates idealized as spheres
RH Relative humidity of the ambient environment in % Ssc(t) Creep slip of reinforcing bar in concrete
Notation | XV
Ue Potential Elastic Energy
V Shear force
Va Shear resistance by aggregate interlocking (vertical component force)
Vcc Shear resistance of compression zone
Vd Contribution of the dowel action of the longitudinal reinforcement to
shear resistance
Vdu Ultimate shear force component carried by dowel action
Vsus Sustained shear load
Vu Shear resistance at ultimate state
Vu,calc Calculated shear resistance
Vu,calc 5% Lower confidence limit (5% fractile) or characteristic value of the
calculated shear resistance
Vu,calc 95% Upper confidence limit (95% fractile) of the calculated shear
resistance
Vu,exp Experimental shear resistance
Vu,mean Mean value of the experimental shear resistance of the beams in the
same series
W Water content in kg/m3 of concrete
W(i, j) Widening of the crack at node i when unity load is acting at node j W′(i) Widening of the crack at node i when applied load equals unity load Wext External work done
Latin lower case letters
ac Effective crack length
acc Length of the horizontal part of shear crack with a bilinear pattern
ag Aggregate content in kg/m
3
of concrete ai Distance between two node pairs
as Shear span
ax , ay Aggregate contact areas in x and y directions
b Beam width
bw Web width (effective beam width)
c Cement content in kg/m3 of concrete cf Critical effective crack extension
d Effective depth of beam
d0 Empirical parameter depending on the type of concrete according to
Bažant and Yu (2008) db Bar diameter
dg Largest nominal maximum aggregate size
ds Effective depth of concrete tooth
dv Effective shear depth, taken as the greater of 0.9d or 0.72h
fc Compressive strength of concrete
fck Characteristic strength of concrete at 28 days
fck, c Characteristic strength of confined concrete
fcm Mean value of compressive cylinder strength of concrete at 28 days
fcm, 52 days Mean value of compressive strength at 52 days
fcm(t) Mean concrete compressive strength at age of t days
fct Axial tensile strength of concrete
fctk Characteristic axial tensile strength of concrete
fctk, sus Characteristic tensile strength of concrete under sustained loading
fctm Mean value of axial tensile strength of concrete
fctm(t) Mean value of axial tensile strength of concrete at age of t days
fnet Net section flexural strength
fr Rupture modulus according to ACI 318
fyk Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement
f(w) Assumed unique softening stress-displacement function for infinitely slow loading
g Gravity acceleration h Total height of the beam
h1 Notch depth
Notation | XVII
hτ Effective shear depth
k Size factor in shear resistance according to EC2
kdg Crack spacing parameter that allows for influence of aggregate size
according to MC2010
ks Cross-section shape-correction factor
kv ,kv,I , kv,II Parameters accounting for shear resistance of cracked concrete
according to MC2010 and CSA-04 lch Characteristic length
lc,max Maximum crack length at failure
ls,unb unbonded length of reinforcement
m, n Empirical parameters, for normal concrete m=0.5 and n=0.1 mb Mass of the beam
s Coefficient that depends on the strength class of cement sc Maximum crack spacing
scr Crack spacing
sz Crack spacing parameter dependent on crack control characteristics of
longitudinal reinforcement according to CSA-04
sze Equivalent value of sz that allows for influence of aggregate size
t Time being considered tꞌ Dummy integration variable
t0 Age of concrete at the time of loading in days
tc Age of concrete when drying began or end of moist curing in days
tcr Duration of sustained loading until failure
u Perimeter of the member in contact with the atmosphere vRd, c Nominal design shear resistance
vcalc Calculated nominal shear resistance
vexp Experimental nominal shear resistance
vu Nominal shear resistance
vu,m Mean nominal shear resistance
w, wi Crack width
0
w& Constant value of loading rate
wc,R Critical crack width for friction capacity according to Reineck (1991)
equal to 0.9 mm
cc
w Dimension free critical crack width x Depth of compression zone
z Internal lever arm between the resulting compressive force FC in
concrete and tensile force FS in steel
zꞌ Distance from the resulting compressive force FC to the top of the
compression zone Greek upper case letters ∆ Midspan deflection
∆ua , ∆va Opening of crack at mid-height in x and y directions
∆us , ∆vs Opening of crack at the level of reinforcement in x and y directions
∆u Midspan deflection corresponding to peak load Pu
∆t Time increment
∆x Distance between concrete teeth
∆0 Midspan deformation when the force has fallen to zero
∆εel Incremental elastic strain
∆εve Incremental viscoelastic strain
∆εvp Incremental viscoplastic strain
∆σ Stress increment ∆w Widening of the crack
Σs Reduced cross section of reinforcement
Greek lower case letters
α Constant which depends on the type of cement and the type of curing
α0 Constant
Notation | XIX
αc Coefficients regarding the crack spacing
αsus Reduction factor for the tensile strength under sustained loading
αu Size effect factor according to Rafla
β Constant which depends on the type of cement and the type of curing β1/2 Constants related to the cement type and the curing conditions
βbc(t,t0) Coefficient to describe the development of basic creep with time
βcc(t) Time development function according to EC2 and MC2010
βdc(t,t0) Coefficient to describe the development of drying creep with time
βH Coefficient depending on the relative humidity and the notional size
βc,sus(t, t0) Reduction factor for compressive strength which depends on the time
under sustained loads
βH Coefficient depending on the relative humidity and the notional size
γ Effectiveness parameter
γc Safety factor, =1.5 for persistent and transient and =1.2 for accidental
loading situations. Recommended 1.5 for design of shear resistance δ Shear displacement or sliding
ε1/2/3/4/5 Empirical material constitutive parameters given by formulae based
on concrete strength and composition, according to B3 Model εc Strain of concrete at the top fibre
εc2 Compressive strain of concrete at reaching the maximum strength
εcr Creep strain
εct Tensile strain of concrete at stress equal to fctm
εct Ultimate tensile strain of concrete
εcu2 Ultimate compressive strain of concrete
εc,max (t) Critical tensile strain of concrete at time t
εc(y) Strain of concrete at a distance y from the top fibre of the section t
εel Elastic strain at time t
εel Elastic strain due to instantaneous loading
εs Strain in reinforcing steel
εsh Shrinkage strain
εvp Viscoplastic strain at time t
η, ξ Natural coordinates of a quadrilateral element η0 Viscosity of viscoplastic element
ηi Viscosity of the i
th
Voigt element
θ0 Angle of crack at peak load under short-term monotonic loading
θ, θc Crack opening angle or angle of rotation
θ0 Crack opening angle due to instantaneous loading
θcreep Crack opening angle due to creep effect
θc,max,long-term Crack opening angle limit under long-term loading
κ Constant value for calculation of the crack opening rate according to Bažant & Li (ranges from 0.01 to 0.05 for concrete)
κ0 Empirical parameter depending on the type of concrete
κ1 Positive constant value representative for the shape of softening curve
λ Load intensity factor (ratio of the sustained load to the ultimate load) λc Critical load intensity, where failure occurs beyond that
µ Mean value of the data set ν Poisson’s ratio
ρs Reinforcement ratio
ς Shear safety margin
σ0 Stress corresponding to wi in the static σ-w relation
σ2 (= σ3) Effective lateral compressive stress at the ULS due to confinement
σR Stress relaxation
σc(y) Stress in concrete at a distance y from the top fibre of the section
σprincipal,1 First principal stress
σsus Axial stress due to sustained loading
σts Mean stress in the concrete regarding tension stiffening
,1...4 xx
σr Element’s nodal stresses in x direction ,1...4
yy
σr Element’s nodal stresses in y direction ,1...4
xy τ
r
Notation | XXI
σ(t) Stress at time t
σ(w) Resistant stress along the crack face, depending on the crack width w τ, τi Retardation/relaxation time
τsh Shrinkage half-time in days
ϕ Angle of the inclined shear crack with respect to the horizontal axis ϕ1 Dimensionless component for calculation of tensile strength in time
ϕ2 Dimensionless component for calculation of E modulus in time
ϕc Safety factor for concrete strength according to CSA, equals to 0.65
φ(t, t0) Creep coefficient, defining creep between times t and t0, related to
elastic deformation at 28 days φ0, bc Basic creep coefficient
φ0, dc Drying creep coefficient
φb(t) Bond creep coefficient
φs Creep coefficient of the crack slide δ
φw Creep coefficient of the crack width w
ωi , χi Parameters depending on the relaxation time of the ith Voigt element
ψ1…6 Coefficients to determine the time-dependent crack displacements
Acronyms
ACI American Concrete Institute BS British Standard
CBM Crack band model
CSA Canadian Standards Association
EC Eurocode
ECM Effective crack model EVP Elasto-visco-plastic EIP Elastic-ideal-plastic FE Finite element
FCM Fictitious crack model FPZ Fracture process zone
MC10 fib Model Code 2010 MC90 CEB-FIP Model Code 1990 TPFM Two parameter fracture model
I
I
n
n
t
t
r
r
o
o
d
d
u
u
c
c
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
Background and Significance
Numerous investigations on reinforced concrete structures have been conducted since a long time, leading to several new theories, which generally are in good agreement with test results. However, the behaviour of reinforced concrete members is complicated by several parameters such as the structure material properties and the way of loading. This is probably the major reason why the discussion regarding the bearing capacity of concrete structures continues in a so varied and widespread way. The importance of the discussions is even increased by the demand for the extension of the lifetime of the existing structures.
The majority of the existing reinforced concrete structures in the Netherlands road network were built before 1975. The shear and bending resistance of the structures such as bridges, viaducts and tunnels in the major highway network or major waterways network, as well as their remaining lifetime, have been recently assessed by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (Rijkswaterstaat). When these structures are assessed for shear, they are often found not to satisfy the criteria for structural safety for two reasons:
• The traffic loads and volumes have increased over the past decades, resulting in more severe load models prescribed by the recently implemented Eurocodes.
• The shear provisions in codes are basically meant to be applied for new structures. For the assessment of existing structures they are often conservative, because they ignore a part of the residual capacity (Walraven, 2010).