firta47
ef*t _nolo
CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL
DES MACHINES A COMBUSTION
ON COMBUSTION ENGINES
20th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON COMBUSTION SS
P.411
THE NEW S1 6R-S ENGINE FOR FAST
PASSENGER AND UTILITY CRAFT
by
T Harada, Y Ishida, I Ichihashi and FE ShiffiokouChi Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltdt
LONDON 1993
CYCIMAC 1991
THE NEW S16R-S ENGINE
FOR FAST PASSENGER AND UTILITY CRAFT
Tuneo HARADA
Yasuhiko ISHIDA **
Ichiro ICHIHASHI ***
Hiroko SHIMOKOUCHI ****
* Deputy Manager, Engine Engineering Department, MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD,
SAGAMIHARA MACHINERY WORKS ** Project Manager, Ditto *** Engineer, Ditto
**** Assistant Chief Engineer, Ditto
ABSTRACT
The S16R-S(60 V 16cyl. bore 170mm x stroke 180mm), compact
high-performance diesel engine, has been developed especially for
the mainpropulsion of high speed craft. Maximum continuous
ratings of up to 2100kw at 2000 r/min and overload ratings of up
to 2300kw at 2060r/min are available. A engine weight is 5500kg
and power to weight ratio is 2.6 kg/kw. The engine operates at
high mean effective pressure levels of 1.93 MPa at MCR.
This new S16R-S. engine has been developed
from
existing Sl6Rwhich is in production since 1989 as land and marine general use
engine. In order to achieve much power and less weight from the
Sl6R, engine performance simulation, thermal flow and stress
analysis were calculated. The rated output of new engine is
increased up to 120% with the improvement, such as constant
pressure turbocharging system applying newly developed
turbocharger, and revision in the injection system. The weight of
engine is reduced to 89% from a original engine. This has been
attained mainly by the adoption of aluminum parts and properly
sized components.
The emphasis of this paper will be on the calculation
analysis program, supercharging system, injection system, and
bench and field test program.
D26
1
1
RnSUM2
Le S16R-S (60°V 16 cyl. bore 170mm x stroke 180mm ) motuer
diesel compact de haute performance, A ete sprecialement congu
pour la propulsion principale des bateaux a haute vitesse. La
puissance continues maximales de pluo de 2100 kW,
a
2000 r/min,et la puissance exessives de plus de 2300 kW
a
2060 r/min sontdisponibles. Le pods d'un moteur est de 5500 kg, et rapport du
poids et de la puissance est de 2.6 kg/kW.
Le moteur fonctionne de maniere optimale a un niveau de
pression de 1.93 MPa a MCR. Le nouveau moteur S16R-S
a
eta cree apartir du S16R deja existant, en production depuis 1989, pour des
moteurs d'utilisation generale sur terre et sur mer.
A fin d'augmenter la puissance, et de reducie le poids du
S16R, une simulation des performances du moteur, le transfert
thermal et une analyse des contraintes ant 'ate' calcules. La
puissance maximale du nouveau moteur a augmenter de 120% avec des
ameliorations telles que la pression constante du systeme
suralimentation s'appliquant ou turbocompresseur recemment crees
et une revision du systerne
a
injection. Le poids du moteur a etereduit de 89% par rapportau moteur initial. Cela
a pu etre
realise principalement grace a l'adoption de pieces en aluminium
et de composant d'une taille precise.
La precision de ce papier porteau sur le calcul du programme
d'analyse, le systerne suralimentation le systeme
a
injection etles resultats et champs d'observations du programme test.
INTRODUCTION
Mitsubishi S16R-S diesel engine, presented here, has been
built as a mainpropulsion engine for high-speed passenger craft
to meet the growing demand for such marine engines.
Mainpropulsion engines for high-speed boat are urged to be
light in weight and compact in size and to be high in power
output and reliability. The S16R-S is a light-weight,
high-output, high-speed version of the S16R which has been turned
out for industrial and marine applications since 1989.
This report describes the performance simulation and the
thermal load and structural analyses conducted for the
development of the S16R-S, constant pressure turbocharging, a
newly developed turbocharger adopted as a result of the
simulation and analyses, improvement of the fuel injection
system, etc.
The S16R-S is a water cooled, 4 stroke cycle, direct
injection, 16 cylinder, 60 vee type high-speed diesel engine, the
bore 170 mm and the stroke 180 mm. It is equipped with four
turbochargers which is made by ourselves.
Table 1 shows the specifications of the S16R-S in comparison
with those of the S16R. Fig. 1 shows its cross sections.
Table.1 Specification of S16R-S 3 Model S16R-S S16R Number of Cylinders 16-60 V 16-60 V Bore X Stroke (mm)_ 170 X 180 170 X 180 Piston Displacement(X103M3) 65.3 65.3 Maximum Output 2096/2000 1765/1800 Mean Effective Pressure (MPa) 1.92 1.80
Mean Piston Speed (m/s) 12.0 10.8
PmeX Cm (MPa.m/s) 23.0 19.4 Fuel Consumption (g/kw.h) 217 217 Length (mm) 3181 3181 Width (mm) 1386 1386 Height (mm) 1923 1923 Weight (kg) 5500 6200
Air Cooler Plate Fin Type Area X1.5 Spilit Cooling System
[Piston[
ALMITE Finished Top Face
Injection Pump Change the Pre-Stroke TIN Plating Plunger Re-Matching
the Delivery Valve
Crankshaft
I
Nitriding Light weight
Fig.1 S16R-S Cross
Section
Turbocharger
'Constant Pressure Turbocharging
I
Oiljet
Made of Aluminum
High efficiency with Diffuser Re-circulate Compressor Cover 2 Nozzle oil jet Connecting Rod Uniformed face pressure Hardening of serration Main Cap
I
Decreasing Hight
lOilpan,Front&Rear Gear Case.Inj.Pump
Bracket
J-COMPONENT DESIGN
In the development of the S16R-S, the calculation of
performance cycle and the analyses of thermal and mechanical
strength of the major components and lightened parts were
comprehensively made in order to shorten the development period
and improve the development efficiency.
Power output of an engine can increased by increasing either
mean effective pressure (Pme) or engine speed (Ne). In case of
the 516R-S, both Pme and Ne were increased on the basis of our idea, which it is more reliable to increase both Pme and Ne than
Pme or Ne only. The target was to increase power output of the
S16R-S by 20% than conventional S16R. In order to increase the
output of the S16R-S and secure high reliability of the S16R
series, the optimum points of Pme and Ne were determined by the
simulated calculation. Fig. 2 shows the thermal load (
theoretical ) at the rated output point. This result derived the
conclusion that it is possible to decrease the combustion chamber thermal load by 18% even if Ne is increased from 1800 rpm to 2000 rpm and Pme, from 1.80 MPa to 1.93 MPa, provided that intake air
charge pressure (Ps) is increased from 0.29 MPa to 0.36 MPa. This
is the reason why a high-efficiency, high-pressure ratio
turbocharger has been developed to be used for the S16R-S.
For supercharging , a constant pressure turbocharging
method has been adopted. Because turbocharger work in higher
efficiency on constant pressure system than on pulse pressure
system, and one cylinder exhaust pulse does not interferes with
another cylinder blow down on constant pressure turbocharging
system, if we increased the valve over lap to lower the exhaust
temperature. (Fig. 3)
The maximum cylinder pressure (Pmax) of the S16R-S remains
the same by changing its compression ratio from 14 to 13 as a
result of the cycle calculation. Hence S16R-S have retained
mechanical strength and reliability.
The valve overlap has been changed from 61 deg. to 93 deg.
to optimize the valve opening and closing timing at high speed (
2000 rev./min ).
As a result of the changes and improvements which was
outlined above, the S16R-S has successfully attained the desired goal to deliver high power output by high supercharging at high
speed, with the cylinder pressure, exhaust temperature and
specific fuel consumption maintained below those of the
conventional S16R.
Design Details
Fig. 1 shows the S16R's parts which have been changed to be
0. 26 .= O. 24 MI . 7 IL, =CY S CY TI & 0.05 7 e..I 1100 1000 800 700 -T e =630V Op S---. A1896 Ac iO3 2850P5/2000rpa n,, 0 APS/Lth,-- O. 564 -,1096 0.620 11 up 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.3 4.0
Charge Air Pressure Ps (X10-11Pa)
Fig.2 Heat Load Calculation
2.2 2. 0
240011S/1800r pro (Conventional Output)
)7 C =0.561 (PS=2. 94 a I a) 950 850 220 215 210 -700 650 GOO AT Constant Turbocharging it 0 APS/1.1h= 0.561 -0096 0.62O d up be 2.2 2.0 Compression Ratio ).: =13 Pulse Turbochargi ng A n =0.504 3.0 2.5 2.0 7.1
-00
3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 1.0Charge Air Pressure Ps (X10- '11Pa)
Fig.3 Comparison between Pulse Turbocharging
and Constant Turbocharging
I 500 I) is a KM SOt O[ -5 00 z15 [;; Peal +9.596 400
---II 000 an 0.22 0.01used for the S16R-S. For decrease in weight , S16R-S changed the
material of its oil pan, front gear case and injection pump
brackets and so on from iron to aluminum alloy, and remove excess
portion from its crankshaft and main bearing caps. For
high-output, high-speed operation, the air cooler and the oil
jets for cooling the pistons, injection pumps and turbochargers
etc. have been changed. 1. Main moving parts
The main components such as crankshaft, crankcase,
connecting rods and pistons were carefully analyzed for thermal
and mechanical stresses that would occur in increasing in power
output and engine speed and decreasing in weight. As necessary,
countermeasures were took or they were improved by redesign,
revision of the specifications. 1.1 Crankshaft
Fig. 4 shows typical results of the crankshaft stress
analysis obtained by testing a solid model according to the
Finite Element Method (FEM). By using the stress concentration
coefficient determined by this method, the accurate values were
able to obtained for bending and torsional stresses occurring in
various parts of the crankshaft.
The crankshaft for conventional S16R is treated by induction
hardening, which cause the residual tensile stresses in the
surface layer at the crank pin fillets. The bending stress
occurring in the S16R-S's crankshaft increases about 10 % by the
20% engine speed increase. Hence the heat treatment for the
S16R-S's crankshaft was changed from induction hardening to
nitriding, which cause compressive residual stress in the surface
layer of the crank pin fillets. Thanks to this nitriding
treatment, the S16R-S's crankshaft has been greatly improved in
safety factor as compared with the crankshafts of the early
models.
The steelmaking process has been controlled to prevent
reduction of crankshaft strength due to non-metallic inclusions.
Moreover, the structure was closely examined and a steel material
suitable for nitriding was selected for the crankshaft. 1.2 Connecting Rod
The connecting rod strength (reliability) was analyzed by
the FEM and component test. In the test, however, it was found
that some portion of the big end joint serrations (teeth) was
insufficient in fatigue strength, because of increasing engine
speed. For this reason, the relief depth of connecting rod bolt
thread were increased to equalize the clamping pressure.
Moreover, the heat treatment conditions were changed to increase
the hardness by % in order to improve the fatigue strength and
safety factor of the big end. And the effect of this modification
was confirmed by the tensile component test.
1.Analysis of Bending Stress and Torsional Stress Analysis Result of FEM Bending Principal Torsional Principal Stress Distribution Stress Distribution
2.Analysis of Fatigue Strength
00 0.5 3.0i1 Film Characteristics 2 1 Induction Hardening (Considering of Residual Stress) Nitriding f-1.7 \11 200 1.0 1 5
Torsional Stress/Fatigue Limit
1765kw/1800min-1
2096kw/2000min-1
300
Period of oil film Safety Factor below 2
Fig.4 Analysis of Crankshaft
Factor of Stress Concentration
Pin Main Bending 5.163 11.22 Twisting 1.991 3.431
Conventional Changing for
Power Up Main Bearing
li
Ill Crank Pin 00
1.5 -I w 0.5 100(star)
4r
fretting Boundary Conditiont heasurement Result of;
of Temperature (Piston Temperature
Setting Boundary Condition
4
of Heat Transfer Coefficient(
(Analysis of Conduction' by 2Dimensional FEM
Correction of Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation Result
Distribution of Temperature Distribution Heat Flux
Heat Balance
Top land 1st Ring Groove
(Analysis of Temcerature and Stress by 3D-FEN
Estimation of Piston Strength High cycle Fatigue by Gas Pressure Heat Cycle Fatigue by Start and Stop
NC YES!
STH
Refry
Itngine.Performance Simulatorl
---?.4ecision of Boundary Conditioni
Distribution of Temp.
Fig.5 Piston estimation Flow Chart
jaata Base of Heat ti
(Transfer Coefficien Cooling Channel Distribution of Principal Stress GOOD: C Top END
1.3 Piston
As to the piston, the heat transfer was calculated by the
FEN and engine performance simulation, which predict the heat
quantity from combustion gas to the pistons, in order to
determine the piston temperature and estimate the thermal stress
and stress due to gas pressure.
Fig. 5 shows the flow chart of our piston strength
estimation. At the first, a boundary condition of piston
temperature and heat transfer coefficient were predicted from the
data base of measurement piston temperature result and heat
transfer coefficient of other engines. Next, distribution of
temperature, heat flux and heat balance of piston were analyzed
by using that boundary condition and the total heat flux which
was predicted by engine performance simulator. And this result
was compared with the result of engine performance simulator. If
the result was right, the boundary conditions were decided and
analysis was continued. If the result was not suitable, the
boundary condition of heat transfer coefficient was corrected,
and this analysis was tried again. Finally, analysis of the
temperature and stress were carried out by three dimensional FEM,
and estimated piston strength.
As a natural consequence, the combustion chamber formed of
the crown has been increased in depth to reduce the compression
ratio and the cooling channel for a jet of the cooling oil
changed in location to secure reliability. The valve overlap has
been increased to increase the amount of charge air. The
conventional S16R had a single-hole oil nozzle, which jetted the
cooled oil into the piston cooling channel only, but the 516R-S
has a 2-hole oil nozzle,which the oil being sprayed into the
cooling channel and also into the back of the piston to improve
cooling. We checked this effect by measuring the pistons
temperature. Fig. 6 shows this result and simulation analysis. It
shows that piston temperature was almost the same as conventional
Sl6R's.
Conventional 516R(1765kw/1800min ill S1611-S(2096ke/2000min
2.11
Measurement of Temperature
Fig.6 Piston, Temperature Distribution
10
225
2. Fuel injection pump
The S16R-S uses PS-type fuel injection pumps designed and
built by Mitsubishi. Table 2 shows the specifications of this
pump. There are some problems to be solved when the rated speed
and power of the engine is to be increased. They are maximum
allowable working pressure of the pumping element, injection
quantity, secondary injection, cavitation and sticking of the
plungers. Hence some parts of PS pump described below was
changed.
Table 2 PS pump Specifications
The pre-stroke was changed from 5 mm to 4.5 mm to prevent
that injection pressure increase too much higher than the maximum
allowable pressure of the pump element for high speed and also to
prevent that the tappet rollers got over the cams nose in
injection period because of high injection quantity.
PS pump uses a special delivery valve which acts as 2 stage
retraction valve to prevent dribbling at the end of each
injection, cavitation and second injection. The conventional
delivery valve is shaped as to pull back predetermined amount of
fuel at the end of injection so that neither dribbling nor
needless secondary injection would take place. But to match wide
load and speed range is too difficult. Hence an ideal delivery
valve was developed. It was designed on the basis of the concept
which the fast retraction, would be followed by a slow
pulling
back to cushion off the primary reflection wave. Now, the special
delivery valve of PS pump approximates the ideal one described
above. It is shown in Fig. 7. {1}
The retraction collar is indicated as (1) and the protruding
part, as (2). In operation, the valve retracts fast for the
initial pulling back until its protruding part begins to enter
the delivery valve seat. During its further entry, a slow
retraction ensures. The duration, timing and amount of pulled
back fuel in this slow retraction are governed by the length of
the protruding part and its clearance in the bore of the seat. [1)
We have matched the length of the protruding part with the
clearance for high speed and high injection quantity. Fig. 8
11
Plunger Diameter 17mm
Cam Lift 15mm
Cylinder Arrangement Inline 6 or 8
Cylinder center Distance 45mm
Mean Geometric Pumping Rate 105mm3/deg.Cam
Max. Fuel Injection Quantity 680mm3/st.
(MPa)
Special Delivery Valve 100 Valve Seat Special (MPa) Delivery Valve 100 . Conventional Delivery Valve 50 0 Nozzle Side g=400(mm3/st) Np-35(s-1) Pump Side Needle lift 0 10 20 30 40
Static CAN Angle (deg)
Inj Timing
Fig.7 Delivery Valve Construction
shows these result. Thus the problems of maximum allowable
working pressure of the pumping element, secondary injection and
cavitation have been solved for obtaining a target injection
quantity of 610 mm3/stroke. [2]
The plunger has been plated by TiN to prevent sticking that
tends to occur when the engine speed is increased.
The effect of these improvements was verified in the
endurance test of the injection pump component and completed
engine, and optimum pump for S16R-S was obtained. 3. Turbocharger
As a result of close examination of the engine performance,
we found that the turbocharger should be increased by 30% in
boost pressure, 35% in air flow and 3% in efficiency. This is the
reason why a new turbocharger has been developed.
The targets were to develop an impeller achieving pressure
ratio up to 4 and working in high efficiency from low to high
pressure ratio and to develop a diffuser matching with the above impeller.
Aluminum alloy impeller was considered best for reliability
and cost. The material strength restricted the maximum peripheral
speed. Hence new impeller had to achieve pressure ratio up to 4
under this peripheral speed condition.
The temperature-rise coefficient had to be improved by 3%,
so the backward angle of blades was changed from 30 deg. to 20
deg. Besides, the number of blades were increased by 20% for
improving efficiency in the high pressure ratio area by
Conventional 1.Injection Quantity 510=3/Stroke Pump Speed 900 rpm 2.Plunger without surface treatment Conventional 1.Pressure Ratio 2.9 Flow Rate 0.6m3/a 2.Turbocharger Type Compressor Without Diffuser Backward Angle of Vane 30° Turbine
Without Nozzle Ring
13 Pump Side a1 I
ct\clec
Nozzle Side ter"-°e1C-4-114) goareAA 300 400 500 600 700. Injection Crtaantity(mm3/St.)Fig.8 Injection Pump,
0 20 i° c su OF 0 & dam 550.35z10 4--otpx/.0 O2.88x1760 4-Quantity of Retraction 170=3 ( custl 0702nd) 153mm0 t 51 1st 002 2nc1), Pre-stroke 4.5= 5mm 0 120
Changing for Power Up
0 ila 1.Injection Quantity 610mm3/Stroke T 100, Pump Speed 1033 :Pm 0; 90
2.Matching the quantity and
speed of retraction 0
3.Changing the pre-stroke 41.Plunger with Tig_plating.1
44
Rated Out Put
516R-S
MN WWII MIN IMAM
Wil" 0'1
Rated Out Put4..0
111no...ansINOMMI
M
Conventional Slenun.IMMIIMINIMMISIM,0/111100n...2.981
in
3.6
NZIUMM/II
Win
3-6WIMMINZIEMINII11111IMIIIMI
arisitairrauSHIM IIMMLMIUMIOIN
anzawnwrinso
,
3.2rfrngwnuMhE111.V MS 3.2
0 MIR MEW MN PICl2m11110111
frtirrIFI
NAa
2.8: 2.8MIMIMAratISAMMIII MEIMIIIM MUNI
1121MWAINICEMI Itt:411 Mr1.3711.51 11097MI MMINIMMINI 2.4 ,L) MIMMI11017AM /7/W/11111411111111 741V:IMAWKOMIN 2.4 [WIWI . SWIYANYVAIMMIlurm 011111111r/W/4714/1 WIIIIIMISOJEWM111111
MktallThiln
NalIW4W144411011 re.0 111,11111/4,CIPIIMINMINEMItIOVILWAMIEMMINEW 2.0flNtflraWflJIas.
WI1711704141117/17111MTIM 1111111ar Wrift/145KOlon elltritnEttfletMMU MIIMMIERJAIMINE 1.6 7FelA1111111111 MMMMMM 1.6IENLIEL=41trOAMINI flURURI INIINIMTUM1111.,a-nn
MMMM44.:aamiamonums. KIWZMIKTMAIMM11111WWIMICVM11111
.t2
allEIOMMOIIIM11111111
0.2 0.4 0 5 0.8 1 0 1.20 0 2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Air Slow Rate (3/s) Air Flow Rate(m3/s)
Fig.9 Turbocharger and Operating Point
Changing for Power Up
1.Pressure Ratio 3.7 Flow Rate 0.82md/s 2.Ttrbocharger Type
Compressor With Diffuser
Backward Angle of Vane 20.
Re-circulate Type Compressor Turbine
With Nozzle Ring
a
1100
1000
2500
2000
150
1000
500
Constant Turbocharging with
Recirculate Type Compressor
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Engine Speed Ne [min-1]
Fig-10 Surging Limit
sea water
Wet
ChargeArt
Air Cooler Thermostat 4 Propeller Cutout Cylinder00000000
00000000
Pulse Turbocharging with Recirculate Type Compressor
Constant Turbocharging with Conventional Type Compressor
14
' Pulse Turbocharging with Conventional
Type Compressor
sea water PUMP
Water PumP Sea Water
Cutlet
Fig.11 Cooling System (Spilit Cooling)
0-increasing temperature-rise coefficient and decreasing the wall
pressure load. And a three dimensional blades shape with splitter
blades was adopted.
For the diffuser, the number of vanes was decreased, because
of increasing the area from surge to maximum flow.
Fig. 9 shows a comparison between the new and conventional
turbochargers. It can be easily seen that both operating range
and efficiency of the new turbocharger have been much improved.
The new compressor achieved pressure ratio 4.4 at maximum
circumferential velocity and 80% efficiency in wide range
pressure ratio from 2 to 4.
Besides, the turbine of the new turbocharger is 'equipped
with a nozzle for increasing efficiency.
For surging problem, we have adopted a recirculate-type
compressor. By this compressor cover and constant pressure
turbocharging, the sufficient surging limit was obtained, Fig.
10. [3]
4- Split Cooling
The air cooler of the conventional S16R engine was directly
cooled by sea water. This cooler used a fin-tube type core which weighed heavier and was likely to suffer damage by sea water than
fresh water cooled air cooler. Hence, the S16R-S uses a fresh
water-cooled, split type cooling system.
Fig. 11 shows this split cooling system. In this system, the
flow of coolant from the crankcase is divided into two circuits,
one leading to the heat exchanger and the other to the by-pass
circuit. 1/3 of the coolant flows into the former circuit and 2/3
into the latter circuit. The hot (about 75 deg. centigrade)
coolant flowing into the heat exchanger is cooled down to about
43 deg. centigrade. This low-temperature coolant flows to the air
cooler for lowering the intake air temperature to 60 degree
centigrade. Then it join the other 2/3 hot coolant and flows into
engine as 70 deg. centigrade water.
Fig. 12 shows a comparison between the sea water-cooled type
cooling system, and the split (jacket water-cooled) type cooling
system in the temperatures of various parts of the engine
coolant. In the sea water cooling system, the coolant temperature
at the air cooler inlet is low and it unnecessarily lowers the
intake air temperature under light load. Therefore the engine apt
to produce white exhaust smoke. In the split cooling system, the
temperature of the coolant passing through the air cooler
is
maintained rather high even under light load condition to prevent
white exhaust smoke. 5. Light. Weight
Fig. 13 shows the process of reducing the weight of major
component parts for the S16R-S.
About 60% of reduced weight have been obtained by changing
material of parts from iron to aluminum. They are front and rear
gear cases, air intake ducts, rocker cases, injection pump
brackets,' oil pan and so on_ The strength of these parts have,
90 BO Et.2 70 60
-m 50 a E-40 30 20 &:7-7-1-Cooler Outlet Air Temp.
c) Spilit Cooling
A After Cooling by Sea Water
A-72
Engine Outlet Water T my.
---Cooler Inlet Water Temp.
200 400 600 Made of Aluminum 570kg Rremove Stock 2151g Increase Delete 170kgi +255:(g1
Fig.13 Sl6R-S Reduced Weight
16
1
1 _I
20 40 60 80 100 110
Load (%)
Fig.12 Water Temperature with Spilit Cooling
Engine Weight Target 6200kg-,5500kg
800 kg 1000 Total Red-used Weight 700 kg
been closely analyzed by the FEM method and the stress
measurement were taken on the engine for verification of
reliability.
The crankshaft, camshafts, main bearing caps timing gears
,etc were reduced in weight by removing excess portion.
As a result of the above-mentioned modification for weight
reduction, the S16R-S is only 5500 kg in total weight, 18% less
the weight of the S16R which is 6200 kg, and is 3.9 kg/kW in
power-weight ratio. The S16R-S achieve a top-of-the-class
lightweight engine available today.
The changed or modified parts for high power output, high
speed and lightweight characteristics, which described above
amounted up to about 40% of the major component parts of S16R-S.
Performance
Fig. 14 shows a comparison of the pulse pressure
turbocharging and constant-pressure turbocharging. In case of the
pulse pressure turbocharging, the exhaust pulse from one cylinder
interfered with scavenging and charging of another and the
exhaust valves action became unstable because of the pulse coming
from another cylinder before the valves close.
In case of the constant pressure turbocharging, however, the
pressure in the exhaust pipe is constant, about 0.18 MPa/cm2, so
that the valves open and close stably at the designed timing, and
the pulses coming from another cylinder didn't interferes with
scavenging and charging.
As a result, it becomes possible to increase the valve
overlap for reducing the thermal load in the cylinder. Fig. 15
shows the performance characteristics of the constant pressure
turbocharging with increased valve overlap.
In conclusion, the target performance has been obtained and
the expected reduction of the thermal load was achieved. The
result is up to expectation; the fuel consumption for the rated
output operation is 212 g/kW-hr and that for 80% output operation
is 200 g/kW-hr, 3 g/kW-hr less the fuel consumption of the
conventional engine.
The temperature and stress measurements taken on the above
mentioned major component parts were below the maximum
permissible limits. The bench endurance tests of the completed
S16R-S engine had been carried out by two engines for a total of
3000 hours for verificat:on of reliability. The tests were the
1000 hours continuous full load test which inclosed the test with
a marine gear at installed angle, the 3 minute idle and rated
load cycling test and the test of the simulated load pattern.
Fig. 16 shows performance of 1000 hour endurance test. After the
test, the engine was disassembled and measured worn quantity of
the parts to estimate the routine service and overhaul intervals.
Judging from these measurements, the same intervals were
expected, notwithstanding the power output has been increased by
120%.
4 3 2 0 180 360 540 720 Crank Angle (tim) 3000 4 3 2500 2 Overload power 2300kw 2060r/min 0 0 Max.cont.power 2100kw 2000r/min 2000 3.< LU 5=
Intake air temp.25t
1500
Raw wate temp.25t
Propeller curve CO CC 7 7,1 UJ C) C-3 1000 Fuel consumption curve 2 43 7 'f5C) 0 500 0 1000 1200 1600 1600 1000 2000 2200 0 ILESO 360 540
Crank Angle (deg.)
ENGINE SPEED
(r/min)
Fig.14 Exhaust Pressure
Pig. 15 S16R-S Engine Performance Map
0
0
0 CC) 100 50 0 0 Cf.) Inclined Configuration
r
Exhaust Gas Temp.
CD
Legend
1.Engine S16R-S
2.Torsionally resilient 3.Reduction gear box
4.Coupling with flexing
5.Reduction gear box 6.Engine S16R-S
7.Torsionally resilient
19
Smoke
Be
°japan Oil Temp.
Charge Air Temp.
Intake Air Temp.
200 400 600 800
Endurance Period (hours) Fig.16 Endurance Test
1000
irliiwitik atgingp
fg=3E4=4.2.Dkr..., mb.tx-a rubber coupling element rubber coupling x E.::.
F1g.17 Fast Liner Installation of 4 XS16R-S
u 700
ro 600
0
Field Test Program
This engine will be installed on a water jet-propelled,
350-passenger high-speed craft capable of cruising at 40 knots
service speed as a main engine for driving the 2-shaft 2 water
jets. This craft is due to sail on a sea trial since August,
1992, and she is is supposed to enter service for April, 1993.
Fig. 17 shows the configuration of the engine and marine gear on
this craft.
CONCLUSION
The theoretical and experimental analysis has confirmed that
S16R-S has been able to increase the out put and engine speed and
decreasing the engine weight from conventional S16R.
The new high efficiency turbocharger and improved high
pressure injection pump for S16R-S enabled the new engine to
realize the way shown by the analysis. The constant pressure
turbocharging supported to decrease heat load in the cylinders.
The result of enduarance test carried out on the two
prototype engines have shown that the over hall period of the new
engine are the same as conventional engine as well as heat load
and mecanical load.
REFERENCES.
[rI] Tsuneo HARADA, Motoi KAWASHIMA, Ichiro ICHIHASHI
"Development of New High-Speed Diesel Engine Series with High-Pressure In-Line Fuel Injection Pumps"
CIMAC 1991
[2] Tatuso TAKAISHI, Mataji TATEISHI, Etsuo KUNIMOTO,
Tashika MATSUO, Yoshinori NAGAE, Hiroshi OIKAWA
"Prediction of Cavitation Erosion in Diesel Engine Fuel Injection Systems"
SAE Paper No. 871631 [3) F.B. FISHER
"Application of Map Width Enhancement Devices to Turbocharger Compressor Stages"
SAE Paper No. 880794