• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

PROBLEM OF TAXONOMIC LIMITATIONS IN THE SYNTHESIS OF THE HISTORY OF BALTIC-PONTIC BORDERLAND IN 3150-1850 BC

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PROBLEM OF TAXONOMIC LIMITATIONS IN THE SYNTHESIS OF THE HISTORY OF BALTIC-PONTIC BORDERLAND IN 3150-1850 BC"

Copied!
35
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

CHRONOLOGY OF CULTURES BETWEEN

THE VISTULA AND DNIEPER:

3150-1850 B C Ivan T. Chernyakov ElkeKaiser Viktor I. Klo hko Aleksander Ko±ko Nikolay N.Kovalyukh VladimirA. Kr uts Mykola N. Kryvaltsevi h Vadim L. Lakiza Jan Ma hnik Sergey V. Nazarov Alla V. Nikolova Vadim V. Skripkin Marzena Szmyt Mihailo Y. Videiko 1 V O L U M E 7

1999

(2)

61-809Pozna«(Poland)

‘w.Mar in78

Tel.(061)8536709ext. 147,Fax(061)8533373

EDITOR

AleksanderKo±ko

EDITORIALCOMMITEE

SophiaS.Berezanskaya (Kiev),AleksandraCofta-Broniewska

(Pozna«), Mikhail Charniauski (Minsk), Lu yna Doma«ska

(Šód¹), ViktorI. Klo hko (Kiev), Valentin V. Otrosh henko

(Kiev),PetroTolo hko (Kiev)

SECRETARY

MarzenaSzmyt

SECRETARYOFVOLUME

AgnieszkaPrzybyª

ADAMMICKIEWICZUNIVERSITY

INSTITUTEOFEASTERNSTUDIES

INSTITUTEOFPREHISTORY

Pozna«1999

(3)

CHRONOLOGY OF CULTURES BETWEEN

THE VISTULA AND DNIEPER:

3150-1850 B C Ivan T. Chernyakov ElkeKaiser Viktor I. Klo hko Aleksander Ko±ko Nikolay N.Kovalyukh VladimirA. Kr uts Mykola N. Kryvaltsevi h Vadim L. Lakiza Jan Ma hnik Sergey V. Nazarov Alla V. Nikolova Vadim V. Skripkin Marzena Szmyt Mihailo Y. Videiko 1 V O L U M E 7

1999

(4)

c

CopyrightbyB-PSandAuthors All rightsreserved

CoverDesign: EugeniuszSkorwider

Lingvisti onsultation:JohnComber

(5)

EDITORS'FOREWORD ... 5

ASSUMPTIONS ... 7

ViktorI.Klo hko,AleksanderKo±ko,MarzenaSzmyt,PROBLEM

OFTAXONOMICLIMITATIONSINTHESYNTHESISOFTHEHISTORY

OFBALTIC-PONTICBORDERLANDIN3150-1850BC ... 7

NikolayN.Kovalyukh,Sergey V.Nazarov,RADIOCARBON

DATINGCALIBRATIONINARCHEOLOGICALSTUDIES ... 12

VadimV.Skripkin,NikolayN.Kovalyukh,RADIOCARBONLSDATING

OFBONEMICRO-SAMPLES ... 27

PARTI.THEBLACKSEABASIN(CHRONOLOGYOFTAXONOMICUNITS) ... 34

Mihailo Y.Videiko, RADIOCARBONDATINGCHRONOLOGYOFTHELATE

TRIPOLYECULTURE ... 34

ViktorI.Klo hko,VladimirA.Kruts,RADIOCARBONDATES

FROMTHEYAMNAYACULTUREBARROWATTHETRIPOLYECULTURE

"GIANTSETTLEMENT"NEARTALYANKY ... 72

AllaV. Nikolova,RADIOCARBONDATESFROMTHEGRAVES

OFTHEYAMNAYACULTUREATTHEINGULETSRIVER

(THEKIROVOHRADREGION) ... 80

AllaV. Nikolova,RADIOCARBONDATINGOFGRAVES

OFTHEYAMNAYAANDCATACOMBCULTURES

ONTHEDNIEPERRIGHTBANK ... 103

ElkeKaiser,RADIOCARBONDATESFROMCATACOMBGRAVES ... 129

Mykola Kryvaltsevi h,NikolayN.Kovalyukh,RADIOCARBONDATING

OFTHEMIDDLEDNIEPERCULTUREFROMBELARUS ... 151

ViktorI.Klo hko,RADIOCARBONCHRONOLOGYOFTHEEARLY

ANDMIDDLEBRONZEAGEINTHEMIDDLEDNIEPERREGION.

THEMYRONIVKABARROWS ... 163

Marzena Szmyt,IvanT. ChernyakovRADIOCARBONCHRONOLOGY

OF"AKKIEMBETSKIYKURGAN".APRELIMINARYREPORT ... 196

PARTII.THEBALTICSEABASIN(CHRONOLOGYOFPONTIC"INFLUENCE") .. 203

Aleksander Ko±ko,PONTICTRAITSINTHEMATERIALSOF

(6)

(POLISH)GROUPOFTHEGLOBULARAMPHORA

CULTURE|ARADIOCARBONPERSPECTIVE ... 211

JanMa hnik, RADIOCARBONCHRONOLOGYOFTHECORDEDWARE

CULTUREONGRZ†DASOKALSKA.AMIDDLEDNIEPER

TRAITSPERSPECTIVE ... 221

VadimL.L akiza, RADIOCARBONDATINGOFTHECORDEDWARE

CULTUREFROMTHENIEMENRIVERBASIN.AGRAVEFROM

PARKHUTY,SITE1,THEGRODNAREGION ... 251

CONCLUSION ... 264

ViktorI.Klo hko,AleksanderKo±ko,MarzenaSzmyt,ACOMPARATIVE

CHRONOLOGYOFTHEPREHISTORYOFTHEAREABETWEEN

THEVISTULAANDDNIEPER:3150-1850BC ... 264

(7)

ThisvolumeoftheBalti Ponti Studies fo usesontheresultsoftheresear h

arried out so far into the absolute (radio arbon) hronology of the area lying

betweentheVistulaandDnieperorthebio- ultural borderlandbetween theWest

andEastofEurope.Absolute hronologyistreatedherebothasaresear hgoaland

fundamentalpremise inthebroaderstudiesof the hronometri anddevelopment

syn hronizationof\borderland" ulturalsystems.Ina seriesofarti les devotedto

individualtaxa a onsiderable numberofnew 14

Cdates havebeen ompared.The

dates on ernsour ematerialsthathavebeen hosenfromthepointofviewoftheir

representativenessand hronometri value (\short-lived"materials werepreferred

to minimize a potential error). The vast majority of analyses were purposefully

made in the same 14

C laboratory of the State S ienti Center of Environmental

Radiogeo hemistry of Ukrainian A ademy of S ien es in Kiev taking advantage of

fundsgenerouslyprovidedbythePolishCommitteeforS ienti Resear h.

Thevolume devotedto the\dark" se tionofthe\borderland"history

(8)

1. All dates in the B-PS are alibrated [see: Radio arbon vol.28, 1986, andthe

nextvolumes℄.Deviations fromthisrule willbepointoutinnotes.

2. Thenamesofthear haelogi al ulturesandsitesarestandarizedtotheEnglish

literatureonthesubje t(e.g.M.Gimbutas,J.P.Mallory).Inthe aseofanew

term,theauthor'soriginalnamehasbeenretained.

3. The spelling of names of lo alities having the rank of administrative entres

(9)

vol.7:1999,7-11

PLISSN1231-0344

ViktorI. Klo hko,AleksanderKo±ko,MarzenaSzmyt

PROBLEM OF TAXONOMIC LIMITATIONS IN THE

SYNTHESIS OF THE HISTORYOF BALTIC-PONTIC

BORDERLAND IN3150-1850 BC

In the time interval mentioned in the title, in the physiographi borderland

betweentheEastandWestofEurope,a y leof ultural hangestookpla e.One

of their onsequen es was the disintegration of distin t ties joining the so ieties

living in thedrainage basins oftheBalti and Bla kSeas. The y le was initiated

bythedisintegrationofthegreat Eneolithi systemsoftheFunnelBeaker ulture

(FBC)andTripolye ulture(TC)of ommonBalkanorigin.Theterritorialsu essor

oftheformerwastheGlobularAmphora ulture(GAC)andCordedWare ulture

(CWC), while thelatter was su eeded by theYamnaya ulture (YC),whi h was

foreignto thementionedtradition[Gimbutas1956;1991; Danilenko1974; Ko±ko

1985;Mallory 1989;-see there formoreliterature; f.a di erentview inVideiko

1994℄. The syn hronization of the development of the CWC and YC, and later

theassessmentofgeneti relationshipsbetweenthem-akeyissueoftheEuropean

prehistoryoftheEarlyMetalAge-ismade onsiderablymorediÆ ult.Intheareas

of old highlands, onthe forest-steppe(the most ulturally reative), between the

upperpartoftheDniester'sdrainage(\limes"ofZªotaLipa)[Ma hnik1979b:52 ℄

andtheDnieper basin,a taxonomi \no-man'sland"appears, i.e. an area la king

any omplexesofsour esthat ouldrevealtheformsoftiesbetween hara teristi s

of both ir les - theCWCand YC.Only in its borderlands- thenorthern, forest

one andthesouthern, steppeone -do we ndpoorly explored manifestations of

the synthesisof both ir les (within theMiddle Dnieper ulture (MDC) and the

Budzhak group of the YC) [Artemenko 1967; 1985; Yarovoy 1985℄.A less a ute

ase of the situation an also be foundin the relationships holding between the

GAC andYC [Szmyt1996b;1999b℄.

Itishardtodeterminenowtowhatextentthispi tureisreal,i.e. howserious

is the deformation aused by the urrent state of resear h. Taking noti e of the

urgentneedtoverifythisdoubt,itmustbesaidthatthestateof\disintegrationof

(10)

The best way to lear up the doubt would be to undertake eld explorations in

sele tedtestareaslo atedinthezoneunderdis ussion,forinstan e,inthevi inity

ofZhytomyr.

Thepro ess ontinuesafterthede line ofthe\proper"CWCandYC, atthe

stage of late or epi- orded ultures and the Cata omb ulture (CC). Its end is

usheredonlybytheemergen eof ulturesrelatedtotheTrz inie horizonandthe

MnogovalikovoiPottery ulture(MPC)[Ko±ko,Klo hko1998;Czebreszuk 1998℄.

With respe t to the periodfrom 3150to 1850 BC, ar haeology based on

ty-po hronologyexperien es a state of \analyti al atrophy"between theVistula and

Dnieper.SystemsoftaxainthebasinoftheBalti andBla kSeasaresyn hronized

withrespe ttooneanotherwithlittlea ura y(\roughly")makingitimpossibleto

pla etheminthesequen esofhistori alevents.Thisiswhyevenwhenonere ords,

forinstan e,\pit-grave"(YC)or\ ata omb"traitsintheVistuladrainage,itis

dif- ult to ventureto assess in greater detail their taxonomi position, notspeaking

ofthequali ationoftheirhistori alpurport.

In onsequen e of this, several negative attitudes an be observed. One of

themisavoiding \in onvenient"issues, anotheroneisinterpreting\ ontrariwise",

i.e. reversing thedire tions in the ir ulation ofspe i patterns( f. theproblem

oftheoriginsofMaªopolska ata omb graves[Klejn1964℄).

1. THEMOTIVATIONANDMETHODOLOGICALASSUMPTIONSOFTHE

RESEARCHPROGRAMINTOTHECOMPARATIVECHRONOLOGYOFTHE

AREABETWEENTHEVISTULAANDDNIEPERFROM3150TO1850BC

Draftedseveralyearsago,theprogramofresear hintothe omparative

hro-nology of thearea between theVistula and Dnieper between 3150 and 1850 BC

tookforgranted theresultsof manyyears' workonthe absolutedatingof

prehi-stori ultural stru tures in the said area arried out earlier. These studies were

ondu tedbymanys holarsinseveral a ademi enters[ f.e.g.aspe tsummaries

byDolukhanov,Timofeev 1972;Mallory 1977;Telegin 1977;1985;Patokovaet al.

1989; We hler 1994℄.Apartfrom lear advantages like,in the rst pla e,thevery

fa tofgradualbuildingthefoundationsoftheabsolute hronology,thee ortsalso

broughtaboute e tsthatwerenotentirelysatisfyingand-inmanyinstan es-that

were notexpe tedbythes holars.

a.Amajor short omingwasan asystemati hoi eofsamples:

{ jointdis ussionofdatingsreferringtodi erentregionsoftheoe umene,often

entirelydissimilarasfarasautogenesisis on erned,ofagiven ulturalunitin

(11)

there are quite a few in thispartof Europe(e.g. kurganswith a stratigraphi

arrangement ofburialsbelongingtodi erentar haeologi al ultures).

Asaresult,thegridof omparative hronologybuiltinthiswaygave riseto

nume-rousinterpretationdisputesmakingobvioustheneedfororganizationalworkusing

theso alledmi rogeographi method[Cofta-Broniewska1989,seethere forolder

literature℄,i.e. hoosing:

{ diagnosti surfa es representative of individual taxa, i.e. regions of a spe i

position(withinthe urrentsynthesis)inthehistoryofdevelopmentof

indivi-dualso ieties,and

{ sour edatarelatingto theseanalyti al units,i.e. re ordsoftaxonomi ally

va-luable assemblages forwhi h there wouldbe organi materials suitable from

thepointofviewofthe 14

Cmethod.

Createdalongthese assumptions,theoutlineofpotentialopeningsforasystemati

studyofthe hronometrybetweentheVistulaandDnieperwasanewqualitybeing,

however,only apointofdeparture.Wewere aware thattakingadvantage ofthem

in a methodologi ally satisfyingmanner alled for oordinated eld work ( f.the

above-mentionedquestionofthe\noman'sland"orareasdeprivedofanysigni ant

setsof hronologi ally valuableassemblage series[e.g.area of theBudzhakgroup

oftheYC-Yarovoy1985℄).

b.Doubtswerealso raised bythepreferen esshowninthe 14

C datingof har oal

andwood,i.e.

{ sending for radio arbon analyses so- alled long-lived materials, whi h ould

(andin manyinstan es,did!) auseinterpretation ompli ations,and

{ frequentdatingtaxonomi allydubioussour esbythismethod,ifone onsiders

thefa tthat har oalsareoftenelementsofthenatural ontentsoflayers/ lling

material of features or ultural material older than the investigated feature

(e e tofdigging-in intoanolder setofsour es).

. Itis worth mentioning aboutin omplete publi ations of thesour e ontextsof

datedsamplesorevenaboutfailurestoreportinformationonmoredetailed

taxono-mi identi ations.Moreover,theavailableliteratureprovideduswiththepi tureof

omparative hronologybasedondatingsmadefromvariousmaterials,atdi erent

timesandwiththeuseofdi erentte hnologiesofradio arbon hronometry.

Allthese reasons(andmanyotherlessimportantbuttroublesomeones)have

given risetothesituationwhi hmay beper eived as haoti :hundredsofdatings

have beenmade but there are nosatisfa tory absolute hronologies in respe t of

bothindividual ulturesandregions. There are also lear datagaps, e.g. a virtual

la kofdatingsfortheGAC [seeSzmyt1996b℄andMDC.

Thesituationpresentedabovewasapointofdepartureforaprogramof

rese-ar h oordinated bya Polish-Ukrainianresear h teamof s holars fromtheAdam

(12)

andStateS ienti CenterofEnvironmentalRadiogeo hemistry).The nan ingfor

theprogramwasgenerouslyprovided,for themostpart,bythePolish Committee

forS ienti Resear hina numberofindividualgrants.

Theprogramisbasedonthefollowingprin iples:

{ most ofthe radio arbon analyses are performed in the 14

C laboratoryof the

StateS ienti CenterofEnvironmentalRadiogeo hemistryoftheUkrainian

A ademyofS ien esinKievwith theresultsbeingrandomlyveri edinother

laboratoriesby\ ross-dating"[seeKovalyukh,Nazarov,Radio arbon

. . .

; Skrip-kin,Kovalyukh,Radio arbon

. . .

,inthisvolume℄;

{ analysesareprimarilymadeofsamplesofbonesorothershort-livedmaterials

(e.g.reeds,et .)andonlywhenthese annotbefound, har oalandwoodare

used;in thiswaywe avoidundue ontroversies onne tedwith the\old-wood

e e t".

{ priority is given to these samples whi h ome form features with preserved

stratigraphy; thus it ispossible to verifyan obtained serieswith independent

data;

{ thear haeologi al ontextofea hdatingshouldbe lear;itshouldbepublished

rstintheBalti -Ponti Studies orin anothers holarlyjournal;inthiswaywe

avoid\empty" datings,theinterpretationofwhi hispra ti ally impossible.

Theimplementationoftheseprin ipleshasen ountered ertain ompli ations.

Weare fullyaware of the ontroversiesthatmay bearousedbythe rstprin iple.

Ithas been adopted, nevertheless, as a onsequen e ofthe hosenorganizational

and nan ialstru ture.Signi ante e tsarebroughtaboutbythe hoi eofbones

asthebasi materialforradio arbonanalyses[ f.methodologi alproblems:

Skrip-kin, Kovalyukh,Radio arbon

. . .

,in this volume℄. The interpretation ofdatings of burntbones,whi hwerethemainmaterialfortheanalysesinthe aseofthe

So e-vkagroupof theTC, presentsaparti ulardiÆ ulty [Kovalyukh,Videiko, Skripkin

1995℄.Furthermore, in ertainsituations,asfor instan einthedatingofmaterials

from oldar haeologi al ex avations, itwas notalways possible to determine with

ertaintythear haeologi al ontext ofthesample (the ase of several datingsfor

stageCIIoftheTCandGAC).Theuseofsu hun ertainsour es,asfarastheir

in-formativevalueis on erned,hasbeenfor eduponusbe auseofthelimiteds ope

ofexplorationworks arriedoutinUkraineatpresent[seealsoSzmyt,Chernyakov,

Radio arbon

. . .

,inthisvolume℄.

Takingintoa ountallprosand ons,webelieve thatourapproa hhasturned

outtobehighlye e tive.Sofar,asaresultoftheprogram,radio arbondateshave

beenobtained inrespe tof ulturalunits fromBelarus, Polandand Ukraine.The

programenlistedthe ooperationofanumberofpeoplewhoseearlier ontributions

tothetaxonomi explorationofthearea betweentheVistulaandDniepertogether

(13)

ments, have beenobtained for thefollowing ultures:TC, stage CII(35 datings),

MDC (17datings),YC(45datings),Kemi-Oba(5datings), and-forthe rsttime

intheliterature-fortheeasterngroupoftheGAC(12datings)[seeKadrow,Szmyt

1996b℄,the CWC with referen es to theMDC (5 datings), theKujawy groups of

theFBCandCWC(orpossiblyfromthe\borderland"oftheFBCandtheCWC)

with\eastern" traits(4 datings),aswell astheGAC inKujawywith\eastern"

ele-ments(7datings).Additionally,inrespe tofyounger ulturalgroups(theTrz inie

Horizon ultureandMPC)sampleswereexaminedwhi hwerepresentedinoneof

theearlier volumesoftheBalti -Ponti Studies[Makarowi z1998;Kovalyukhetal.

1998℄.Itisworthmentioningthatamethodologi allysimilarprogramwas

indepen-dentlyimplementedalsoinrespe toftheCC(24datings)[Kaiser,Radio arbon

. . .

; Nikolova,Radio arbondating

. . .

,inthisvolume℄.

Geographi allyspeaking, thedis ussedsour es omefromtheright-bank(i.e.

western)partof theMiddleDnieperarea, theL ower Dniester,Volhynia,Podolia,

MaªopolskaandKujawy.

2. RESEARCHPOTENTIAL

The obtained bodyof data makes it possible toanalyze fromvarious aspe ts

the hronologi aland ulturalsituationbetweentheVistulaandDnieperfrom3150

to 1850 BC. In the on lusion of thepresentvolume [Klo hko, Ko±ko,Szmyt, A

Comparative

. . .

, in this volume℄, we outline two aspe ts of thesituation. One of themisthe hronologyofsele ted ulturalunitsin di erentzonesoftheterritory

they o upy. This, in turn, allows us to tra e outthe urrent foundationsof the

omparative hronologyin theoverall \inter uvial"territory.

At thesame time, we regard this state of exploration as a register of future

resear htasks.Oneoftheissueswhi hstillremainsun learisthepolylinearismof

developmentof ulturalsystemswhi h forthetime beingare treatedas \blo ks".

Similarly inspiring isthe veri ation of theprin iple of\peripheral survivals" [ f.

e.g. the hronologyof thede line of theTC So evka group:Kovalyukh, Videiko,

Skripkin1995℄.The borderlandoftheEastandWestofEuropeinthesaidperiod

whenagrarianand\pastoral" ulturesmet ontinuestobeoneofthemostimportant

resear hareas inthebuildingofa synthesisofEuropeanprehistory.

Anyfurtherresear hshallbere ordedinthenextvolumesoftheBalti -Ponti

(14)

AO { Arkheologi heskiyeotkrytya,Moskva.

AJA { Ameri anJournalofAr haeology,NewYork.

BPS { Balti -Ponti Studies,Pozna«.

EA { EurasiaAntiqua,Berlin.

FPP { Folia Praehistori a Posnaniensia,Pozna«.

KSIA { Kratkiyesoobsh heniyaInstitutaArkheologii,Moskva.

KSIAANUSSR { Kratkiye soobsh heniya Instituta Arkheologii AN USSR,

Kiev.

KSIIMK { Kratkiye soobsh heniya Instituta Istorii Materialnoy

kul-tury,Moskva.

KSOGAM { Kratkie Soobsh heniya OdesskogoGosudarstvennogo

Ar-kheologi heskogoMuzeya,Odessa.

MIA { Materialy iissledovaniyapoarkheologii,Moskva.

NAIANANU { NaukovyArkhivInstitutaArkheologiiNa ionalnoi

Akade-mii NaukUkrainu, Kiev.

SA { SovetskayaArkheologia, Moskva.

SpA { SprawozdaniaAr heologi zne, Kraków.

ZFA { Zeits hriftf urAr haologie,Berlin.

REFERENCES

AleksandrovskiyA.L.,O.A.Chi hagova,K.E.Pustovoytov,N.I. Shishlina

1997 Metodika i metodologiya radiouglerodnykh issledovaniy

arkheologi he-skikh obyektov stepnykhregionov Rossii. In: P.M. Kozhin (Ed.), Step i

Kavkaz.TrudyGosudarstvennogoIstori heskogoMuzeya,9-21.Moskva.

AlekseyevaI.L.

1992 KurganyepokhipaleometallavSevero-zapadnom Pri hernomorye.Kiev.

Arkheologiya

1985 ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,2ndedition.Kiev.

ArslanovKh.A.

1987 Radio arbon:Geo hemistryandGeo hronology.L eningrad,L eningrad

Uni-versityPress.

ArtemenkoI.I.

(15)

38-1964 Neoliti heskiyestoyankiikurganyepokhibronzyblizs.Khodosovi hi,

Go-melskoyobl.BSSR.In:PamyatnikikamiennogoibronzovogovekovEvrazii,

31-87.Moskva.

1967 PlemenaverkhnegoisrednegoPodneproviav epokhubronzy.Moskva.

1976a Belynetskiymogilnik(raskopki1970-1971g.g.). In:Vosto hnaya Evropav

epokhukamniaibronzy,155-175.Moskva.

1976b Mogilniksrednedneprovskoykulturyvuro hish heStrelitsa. In:Eneoliti

bronzoviyvekUkrainy,69-96.Kiev.

1985 Srednedneprovskayakultura.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,vol.1:

364--374.Kiev.

1987a Srednedneprovskayakultura.In:EpokhabronzylesnoypolosyS S SR,37-42.

Moskva.

1987b KulturyrannegobronzovegovekajuzhnojpolosylesovEvropejskoy hasti

SSSR.In:EpokhabronzylesnoypolosyS S SR,35-51.Moskva.

Bagi«skaJ.

1988 Cmentarzyskokurhanowekultury eramiki sznurowejw Šub zu,stan.24,

gm. Jar zów, woj.zamojskie.In: Sprawozdaniaz bada«terenowy hw

wo-jewództwiezamojskimw1988roku,5-6.Zamo±¢.

1990 KurhanKCSz| stanowisko30w Wersz zy y,gm. Jar zów.In:

Sprawoz-daniaz bada« terenowy hwwojewództwiezamojskimw 1990roku, 20-23.

Zamo±¢.

1992 CmentarzyskokurhanoweKCSznaGrzdzieSokalskiej |stanowisko25

wNede»owie, gm.Jar zów. In:Sprawozdania zbada«terenowy hw

woje-wództwiezamojskimw1992roku,9-10.Zamo±¢.

1996 Kurhankultury eramikisznurowejo stratygra znym ukªadzie grobówz

Nede»owawwoj.zamojskimna GrzdzieSokalskiej.SA48:59-66.

1997 Cmentarzyskokurhanowekultury eramikisznurowejnaGrzdzie

Sokal-skiej|stanowiskaŠub ze37,Wersz zy a1.Ar heologiaPolski

‘rodkowo--Ws hodniej2:45-52.

1998 Badania kurhanu kultury eramiki sznurowej na Grzdzie Sokalskiej w

Hubinku,stan.4,woj. zamojskie.Ar heologiaPolski±rodkowo-Ws hodniej

3:69-77.

BerezanskaS.S.

1971 Sredniodneprovskakultura. In: Arkheologiya Ukrainskoy S SR,vol.1,

309--317.Kiev.

Berniakovi¢K.V.

1959 

(16)

Ar heolo-BogatayaL.V., I.V.Manzura

1994 Ost-West-We hselbeziehungenimSpiegelderaneolithis h-fr 

uhbronzezeit-li hen Kulturen des nordwestli hen S hwarzmeergebietes. Zeits hrift f ur

Ar haologie28:63-86.

Brat henkoS.N.

1976 NizhneyePodonevepokhu sredneybronzy.Kiev.

Brat henkoS.N.,O.Shaposhnikova

1985 Katakombnayakulturno-istori heskayaobsh hnost.In:Arkheologiya

Ukra-inskoyS SR,vol.1,403-420.Kiev.

BrykJ.

1930 Neolity zne kurhany ze szkieletami skur zonymi w Ka zanów e w pow.

skaªa kim, woj. tarnopolskie.In: Ksiga pami¡tkowa ku z i prof. dr. W.

Demetrykiewi za,135-150.Pozna«.

Bu hvaldekM.

1986a Kulturases nurovu keramikouv stredni Evrope, I. Skupiny mezi Har em a

Bilmi Karpaty.Praehistori a12.Praha.

1986b Zum gemeineuropais hen Horizont der S hnurkeramik. Praehistoris he

Zeits hrift:61:129-151.

Bu hvaldekM.,D. Koute ky

1970 Vikleti e.EinS hnurkeramis hes Graberfeld.Praehistori a 3.Praha.

BudziszewskiJ.

1995 Flintmaterials from emeteries oftheSo evkatype,BPS5:148-190.

BurdoN.B., M.Y.Videiko

1998 OsnovykhronologyiTripolye-Cu uteni.Arkheologiya2:17-29.

BuzinnyM., V.Skripkin

1995 NewlyDesigned 0.8mlTe on

R

Vial forMi rovolume Radio arbon

Da-ting.Radio arbon34(2):724-748.

BydªowskiA.

1905 Mogiªy z Ja kowi y w powie ie lipowie kim w gub.Kijowskiej. ‘wiatowit

6:8-30.

Cha hlikowskiP.

1994 Osiedlakulturypu harów lejkowaty hwPodgaju,woj.wªo ªawskie,

stanowi-sko6A.Pozna«.

CharniauskiM.M.

1963 Starazhytniyashakhtypazdaby hykremeniu. In:VestiANB S SR.Ser.

gra-mad.navuk, No.3.Minsk.

1979 NealitBelaruskagaPaniamonnya. Minsk.

(17)

CharniauskiM.M., M.M.Kryvaltsevi h

1993 Bronzavyvek.In:ArkhealogiyainumizmatykaBelarusi.Entsyklapedyia,

96--97.Minsk.

CharniauskiM.M., V.I.Kudrashou,V.L. Lipnitskaya

1996 Starazhytniyashakhtsyoryna Rosi.Minsk.

CharniauskiM.M., V.L.L akiza

1995 ZnakhodkikamennykhsvidravanykhsiakernaPaniamonni.In:

Gistary h-na-arkhealagi hnyzbornik7:46-59.

Cheredni henkoN.N.,S.Z.Pustovalov

1991 Boyeviyekolesnitsyi kolesni hiev obsh hestvekatakombnoykultury.SA

4:206-216.

ChernyakovI.T.,G.N.Toshtsev

1985 Kulturno-khronologi heskiyeosobiennostikurgannykhpogrebeniyepokhi

bronzynizhnego Dunaya. In: Novyye materialy po arkheologii

Cevero-Za-padnogoPristernomoriya,5-31.Kiev.

1986 Moldaviaisosedniyeterritorriivepokhu bronzy.Kishiniev.

1995 Grobni yKemi-ObinskogotipaCevero-ZapadnogoPri hernomorya.

Ros-siyskayaArkheologiya3:193-197.

ChernykhL.A.

1991 Derevyannayapovozkaiz katakomnogopogrebeniyaug.

Kamenka-Dnie-perovskaya.In: KatakombniyekulturySevernogo Pri hernomorya,137-149.

Kiev.

ChernyshY.K.

1982 EneolitPravoberezhnoyUkrainyi Moldavii.In:EneolitS S SR.Moskva.

ChmykhovM.O, I.T.Chernyakov

1988 Khronologiaarkheologi hnykh pamyatokepokhymidi-bronzy na teritorii

U-krainy.Kiev.

ClarkR.A.

1975 A alibration urveofradio arbondates. Antiquity49:251-266.

Cofta-BroniewskaA.

1989 Methodology of Regional Studies in Kuiavia. In: A. Cofta-Broniewska

(Ed.), Prehistori onta ts of Kuiavian ommunities with other European

peoples,13-24.Warszawa.

Cu osS.

1984 L a n de la ulture Cu uteni dans le ontexte de l'eneolitique du bas

-Danube. La ivilisationdeCu uteni en ontexteEuropeen: 125-132.Iasi.

CzebreszukJ.

(18)

CzebreszukJ., A.Ko±ko,P.Makarowi z,M.Szmyt

1999 Podsumowanie. In: A. Ko±ko (Ed.) Ar heologi zne badania ratowni ze

wzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu tranzytowego, Vol. III Kujawy, Part 4, Osadni two

Kultur pó¹noneolity zny h oraz interstadium epok neolitu i br¡zu: 3900

-1400/1300B C.Pozna«,inprint.

CzebreszukJ., M.Szmyt

1992 Osadni twoneolity zneiw zesnobr¡zowewDba hwoj.wªo ªawskie,

stano-wisko29.Pozna«-Inowro ªaw.

1998 DerEpo henumbru hvomNeolithikumzurBronzezeitimPolnis hen

Tie- andam BeispielKujawiens. Praehistoris heZeits hrift73:167-232.

2000 The IIIMillennium BC inKujawy inthelight of radio arbon dating.In:

J.Czebreszuk, J. M 

ller(Eds.)TheAbsoluteChronologyinCentralEurope

duringtheIII MillenniumB C. Pozna«-Berlin, inprint.

Czerniak L.,L.Doma«ska,A. Ko±ko,D. Prinke

1991 TheFunnelBeakerCultureinKujavia.In:D.Jankowska(Ed.),Die

Tri h-terbe herkultur.NeueFors hungenund Hypthesen,vol.2,67-76.Pozna«

DanilenkoV.N.

1974 EneolitUkrainy.Kiev.

DanilenkoV.N.,N.J. Makarevi h

1956 Chervonokhytirskiymogilnikmidnogovikyztrupospaleynnami, AP6:

92--98.

DavnyaistoriyaUkrainy

1997 DavnyaistoriyaUkrainy,vol.1.Kiev.

Derga hevV.A.

1980 PamyatnikipozdnegoTripolya.Kishinev.

Derga hevV.A. ManzuraI.V.

1991 PogrebalnyekompleksyPozdnegoTripolya.Kishinev.

DolukhanovP.M.,V.I. Timofeev

1972 Absolutnaya khronologiyaneolita Evrazii (po dannym radiouglerodnogo

metoda).In:B.A. Kol hin[Ed.℄Problemyabsolutnogodatirovanniyaw

ar-kheologii,28-75.Moskva.

Dumitres uV.

1974 Chronologiaabsolutaaeneoliti iluiromanes inluminadatelorC 14

.

Apu-lumXII. AlbaIulia.

DvoryaninovS.A.,A.N.Dzigovskiy,L.V.Subbotin

1985 Raskopkikurgannoygruppyus.Vishnevoe.In:Noviyematerialypo

arkhe-ologiiSevero-ZapadnogoPri hernomorya,132-173.Kiev.

EastonD.

(19)

GimbutasM.

1956 The prehistoryofEasternEurope.Part1.Ameri an S hool of Prehistori

Resear h Bulletin20.

1991 TheCivilizationoftheGoddess.TheWorldof OldEurope.SanFran is o.

GirininkasA.

1990 Kratuonas.Sredniyipozdniyneolit. In:ArkhealogiyaLitvy.Vilnius.

GorodtsovV.A.

1900 Nazna heniyeglinyanykhplos hadokvdoistori heskoykulturetripolskogo

tipa.In:Arkheologi heskiyeizvestiyaizametki, 11-12.Moskva.

G orsdorfJ.,J. Bojadzhiev

1996 Zur absoluten Chronologie der bulgaris hen Urges hi hte. Beliner 14

C--Datierungen von bulgaris hen ar haologis hen Fundplatzen. EA2:

105--173.

GurbaJ.,J. Wojtanowi z

1974 Problematykaar heologi zno-geogra znakurhanówi mentarzysk

kurha-nowy hnaGrzdzieSokalskiej.In:PrzewodnikXIIOgólnopolskiegoZjazdu

PolskiegoTowarzystwaGeogra znego,57-61.Lublin.

Jastrzbski S.

1989 KulturaCu uteni-Trypoleijejosadni twona W y»ynieWoªy«skiej.Lublin.

1991 The settlement of theFunnel Beaker ulture at Gródek Nadbu»ny, the

Zamo±¢distri t, site 1 | brief hara teristi s. In:D. Jankowska (Ed.)

DieTri hterbe herkultur.NeueFors hungenundHypothesen,vol.2,189-196.

Pozna«.

Ka halovaN.K.

1974 ErmitazhnayakollektsiyaN.E.Brandenburgaepokhibronzy.Svod

Arkheolo-gi heskikhIsto hnikov,vyp.B4-12.Moskva.

KadrowS.

1995 Absolute hronologyoftheSo evka typein thelight of 'wiggle mathing'

analysis.In:Cemeteries of theSo evkatype:2950-2750BC. BPS3:

141--147.

KadrowS., A.Ko±ko,M.Videiko

1995 Pottery stylisti s of the So evka type: geneti - ultural quali ation. In:

Cemeteries oftheSo evkatype:2950-2750BC.BPS3:200-213.

KadrowS., J.Ma hnik

1997 Kulturamierzanowi ka.Chronologia,taksonomiairozwójprzestrzenny.

Kra-ków.

KadrowS., M.Szmyt

1996 Absolute hronologyof theeastern groupofGlobularAmphora ulture.

(20)

KempistyA.

1978 S hyªek neolitu i po z¡tki epoki br¡zu na W y»ynie Maªopolskiej w ±wietle

bada«nad kop ami.Warszawa.

1982 Problem metalurgii miedzi w kulturze sznuroweji kultura h

postsznuro-wy hna póªno odKarpat.PamitnikMuzeum Miedzi1:67-78.

KlejnL.S.

1964 Obe no±¢elementów poªudniowo-ws hodni hw pó¹noneolity zny h

kul-tura hMaªopolski, AP9:371-399.

Klo hkoV.I.

1984 Ot hetorabote Mironovskoyekspeditsii InstitutaarkheologiiAN USSR

v1984g.Kiev.(manus ript,in:Nau hniyarkhivInstitutaArkheologiiNAN

Ukrainy,No. 1984/21).

1995 Copperobje tsandquestions of\So evkametallurgy". In:Cemeteries of

theSo evkatype:2950-2750BC.BPS5:235-242.

Klo hkoV.I.,A.Ko±ko

1995 Weapons from So evka type emeteries. In: Cemeteries of the So evka

type:2950-2750BC.BPS5:228-234.

Klo hkoV.I.,B.Stolpiak

1995 Glassbeads fromSo evka emetery.In:CemeteriesoftheSo evkatype:

2950-2750BC. BPS5:243-246.

Kol hinB.A., N.Y. Sher

1972 Absolutnoye datirovaniyevarkheologii. In: B.A. Kol hin [Ed.℄ Problemy

absolutnogodatirovaniyav arkheologii:3-10.Moskva.

KomanW.

1988 Badania mikroregionalne na Grzdzie Sokalskiej. Cmentarzysko

kurha-nowe kultury eramiki sznurowej w Šub zu na stan. 2, gm. Jar zów. In:

Sprawozdania z bada« terenowy h w województwie zamojskim w 1990 r.,

11-19.Zamo±¢.

1990 Badania mikroregionalne na GrzdzieSokalskiej. In:Sprawozdania z

ba-da«terenowy hwwoj.zamojskimw1990roku,11-19.Zamo±¢.

1998 Sprawozdania z bada« wykopaliskowy h kurhanu kultury eramiki

sznu-rowejnastan.3wHubinku,woj.zamojskie.Ar heologiaPolski

‘rodkowo--Ws hodniej3:61-68.

KomanW.,J.Ma hnik

1993 Mohyly kult ury sosn urovoukeramikou v juhozapadnej  asti Woly«skej

Vysiny.Vy hodoslovenskyPravek4:41-47.Nitra-Kosi e.

KonoplaV.

(21)

KorovinaA.K.

1974 KurganMezhlimanniy. SA4:201-215.

Ko±koA.

1981 Udziaª poªudniowo-ws hodnioeuropejski h wzor ów kulturowy h wrozwoju

ni»owy hspoªe ze«stwkulturypu harów lejkowaty h.Pozna«.

1985 In uen esofthe\pre-yamnaya"(\pre-pitgrave")CommunitiesfromBla k

SeaSteppeAreainWesternEuropeanCultures.In:J.Kozªowski,J.

Ma h-nik(Eds),L' 

Eneolithiqueetledebutdel'^agedubronzedans ertainesregions

del'Europe,57-72.Wro ªaw-Warszawa-Kraków-Gda«sk-Šód¹.

1986 Papros,woj. Bydgosz z, stan.6A,6B, 6G|obozowiska z fazylubo«skiej

(IV)kultury pu harów lejkowaty h (Przy zynek dobada« nad

pó¹nopu- harowymifazamirozwojukulturypu harówlejkowaty hwstre e

wielko-dolinnejNi»uPolskiego).FPP2:13-67.

1987 Osady kultury pu harów lejkowaty h w Inowro ªawiu-M¡twa h, woj.

Byd-gosz z, stanowisko1.Inowro ªaw.

1988 Formyeksploata jipowierz hnistanowiskawepoka hneolituibr¡zu.In:

A.Cofta-Broniewska(Ed.)Miejs epradziejowy hi±redniowie zny hpraktyk

kultowy hwKruszy Zamkowej,15-64.Pozna«.

1989 ThemigrationofSteppeandForest-steppeCommunitiesintoCentral

Eu-rope.TheJournalof Indo-EuropeanStudies 18:309-330.

1990 The Vistula-Oder Basins and the North Ponti Region. The Journal of

Indo-EuropeanStudies19: 235-258.

1991a Zbada«nadtzw.horyzontemstarosznurowymwrozwoju

pó¹noneolity z-nejkultryspoªe ze«stwKujaw. Folia Ar haeologi a16: 85-95.

1991b Globular Amphora ulture versus Funnel Beaker ulture. In: A.

Cofta--Broniewska(Ed.)Newtenden iesinStudiesofGlobularAmphora ulture.

Ar haeologiaInterregionalis14,87-112.Warszawa-Kraków-Pozna«.

1996 Gruparadziejowskakulturypu harówlejkowaty hjakoprologkujawskiej

enklawy naddunajskiej ywiliza ji w zesnobr¡zowej. In: A.Ko±ko(ed.) Z

bada« nad genez¡ regionalizmu kulturowego spoªe ze«stw Kujaw, 91-106.

Pozna«-Kruszwi a-Inowro ªaw.

1997 Chronologi al-geneti frameworkofthe\Ahorizon"featuresinthe

deve-lopmentof theKuiavian FBC. In:Early-CordedWareCulture.The

A-Ho-rizon| tionorfa t?(ArkaeologiskeRapporter2),125-133.Esbjerg.

Ko±koA.,V.I.Klo hko(Klo ko)

1987 L ate Neolithi omposite bow from Bo»ejewi e, Bydgosz z voivodship,

NorthernPoland andtheproblemoforientalinspirationsinthe

develop-mentofEuropeanar hery.JournaloftheSo ietyofAr her-Antiquaries30:

15-23.

(22)

1998 \Trz inie " | Borderland of Early Bronze Age Civilization of Eastern

and Western Europe? In: The Trz inie Area of the Early Bronze Age

Civilization:1950-1200BC, BPS6:190-202.

Ko±koA.,J.L anger

1986 Zbada«nadwytwarzaniemiu»ytkowaniemdzieg iuwneoli ie.Kwartalnik

HistoriiKulturyMaterialnej4:587-600.

Ko±koA.,M.Szmyt

1993 Neolity zny kompleks osadni zy na obszarze \Wzgórza Prokopiaka" w

Opatowi a h,gm.Radziejów, woj.wªo ªawskie.Staniperspektywybada«.

ZiemiaKujawska9:159-182.

KovalevaI.F.

1983 Pobrebalniyobryadiideolgiyarannikhskotovodov.Kiev.

KovalyukhN.,V.Skripkin,V.I. Klo hko,S.Lysenko

1998 Absolute (Radio arbon) Chronologyof theEastern Trz inie ulture in

theDnieperRiver. In:TheTrz inie AreaoftheEarlyBronzeAge

Civi-lization:1950-1200BC,BPS6:130-140.

KovalyukhN.N.,V.V. Skripkin,E.V.Sobotovi h

1996 Pe uliaritiesofCarbonBehavioroftheRea torGraphiteoftheChernobyl

FallOut.In:ThirdInternationalSymposiumandExhibitionon

Environmen-talContaminationinCentralandEasternEurope,731-733.Warsaw.

KovalyukhN.,M.Videiko,V.Skripkin

1995 Chronology of the emeteries of the So evka type: ar haeologi al and

isotopi one. In: Cemeteries of theSo evka type:2950-2750BC. BPS3:

135-140.

KraynovD.A.

1972 DrevneyshayaistoriyaVolgo-Okskogomezhdure hia. Moskva.

KrukJ.,S.Milisauskas

1983 Chronologiaabsolutna osadni twaneolity znego z Brono i , woj.

kiele -kie.AP28:257-320.

KrutsV.A.

1968 Novyimogilnikso yvskogotipubiliyas.ZavalovkanaDnipri.Arkheologiya

21:130-133.

1977 PozdnetripolskiyepamyatnikiSrednegoPodneprovya.Kiev.

1994 \GiantSettlements"andsomedemographi problems onne tedwiththe

TripolyeCulture.Ar heologiaPolski39:29-30.

KrutsV.A.,S.M.Ryzhov

(23)

Kri hevskiyE.Y.

1940 Poselennia vGorodsku.In:Tripilskakultura,383-451.Kiev.

Kryvaltsevi hM.M.

1996 Graveof theMiddleDnieper ulture from ProrvaSite 1(Gomelregion,

Belorus).In:EasternexodusoftheGlobularAmphorapeople:2950-2350

BC.BPS4:98-102.

1997 Bronzavyvek.In: ArkhealogiyaBelarusi. Vol.1.Kamenny i bronzavy viaki,

288-290.Minsk.

1999 Azyarnoye1|paselish ha epokhibronzyna polna hy Palessia.Minsk.

KrzakZ.

1989 Zªota ulture.In: Zespoªydatowanemetod¡ 14

C, Przegl¡dAr heologi zny

36:255-269.

KurzawaJ.

1999 Zagadnienienajw ze±niejszy hfazkultury eramikisznurowejnaNizinieW

iel-kopolsko-Kujawskiej. Problem tªagenety znegospoªe ze«stw kultury

pu ha-rówlejkowaty h.Pozna«.

KuznetsovP.F.

1996 Noviyeradiouglerodniyedatydlyakhronologiikultureneolita-bronzovogo

vekayugalesostepnogoPovolzhya.In:ArkheologiyaiRadiouglerod1:56-59.

L agodovskayaE.F.

1953 Tripolskoyeposeleniyevs.SandrakyinekotoryevoprosypozdnegoT

ripo-lya.KSIA ANUS SR2:76-77.

L agodovskaO.

1956 Pizdnyotripillske poselennia v s. Sandrakakh. Arkheologi hni Pamyatki

US SR6:118-129.

L akizaV.L.

1997 Pakhavanneranniabronzavaga hasunaNizhniaySh hary.In:Vestki

Aka-demiiNavukBelarusi.Seryiagumanitarnykhnavuk No. 1,54-59.Minsk.

1999 ParkhutyI |novypomnikneolitui bronzavaga veku na Sh hary.

Gista-ry hna-arkhealagi hnyzbornik14:104-124.Minsk.

L angerJ.J.,A.Ko±ko

1992 Studiesontheorgani omponentsinNeolithi potterydyes.Ar haeologia

Polona30:61-68.

1999 Zbada«nadzastosowaniemdzieg iuwornamenty e eramikineolity znej.

PerspektywaNi»u Polski.Folia Prehistori aPosnaniensia9:63-78.

L angerJ.J.,S.Pietrzak

1999 Wytwarzaniei zastosowaniedzieg iuw kultura hpó¹noneolity zny h.In:

A. Ko±ko (Ed.)Ar heologi zne badania ratowni zewzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu

(24)

L angerJ.J.,M.Szmyt

1999 Zastosowanie barwników mineralny h w zdobni twie eramiki KAK. In:

A. Ko±ko (Ed.)Ar heologi zne badania ratowni zewzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu

tranzytowego,Vol.III Kujawy,Part4,Osadni twokulturpó¹noneolity zny h

orazinterstadiumepokneolituibr¡zu:3900-1400/1300B C.Pozna«,inprint.

Ma hnikJ.

1966 Studia nad kultur¡ eramiki sznurowej w Maªopols e. Wro ªaw-W

arszawa--Kraków.

1979a Kr¡g kulturowy eramiki sznurowej. In: W. Hensel, T. Wi±la«ski (Ed.),

Neolit,PrahistoriaZiemPolski h2:337-412

1979b Zestudiównadkultur¡ eramikisznurowejwdorze zugórnegoDniestru.

A taAr haeologi aCarpati a 19:51-77.

1997 Staniperspektywybada«kultury eramikisznurowejwmidzyrze zu

gór-nejWisªy, BuguiDniestru.SpA50: 13-29.

Ma hnikJ.,A.Pil h

1997 Zaskakuj¡ eodkry iezabytkówkultury±rodkowodnieprza«skiejw

Mªodo-wie-Zak¡ iukoªoLuba zowa, wwoj.przemyskim.SpA49:143-170.

Ma hnikJ.,E.Sosnowska.

1998 Kurhanludno± ikultury eramikisznurowejzprzeªomuIIIiIItysi¡ le ia

przed Chrystusemw Woli Wgierskiej, gm. Ro¹wieni a, woj. przemyskie

(badaniaar heologi znew1997roku).Ro znikPrzemyski34(3).

Ar heolo-gia:3-20.

Ma hnikJ.,J.‘ ibior

1991 Die Chronologie der S hnurkeramik (S hK) in S udostenpolen. In: Die

Kontinentaleuropais henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,Praha-Stirin

1-6.10.1990.DieChronologieder regionalenGruppen, Zusammenfasungen,

45-53.FreiburgiBr.

Makarowi z P.

1998 Absolute hronologyoftheTrz inie omplexintheVistula drainage.In:

The Trz inie Area of theEarly Bronze Age Civilization: 1950-1200BC,

BPS6:141-155.

MakkayJ.

1985 Di usionism,antidi usionismand hronology:somegeneralremarks.A ta

Ar haeologi aHungari a37(1-2):3-12.

1996 C-14Chronology:EasternEurope.In:K.Randsborg(Ed.),Absolute

Chro-nology:Ar haeologi alEurope2500-500BD.A taAr haeologi a67:

219--225.

MalloryJ.P.

(25)

1989 Insear hof theIndo-Europeans.L ondon.

MalloryJ.P., D.Y.Telegin

1994 Poyava kolesnogo transportu na Ukraini za radiokarbonnymi dannymi.

In: Problemy khronologii kultur eneolita-bronzovogo veka Ukraini i

yuga--vosto hnoyEvropy,30-31.Dniepropetrovsk.

MantuC.

1997 ChronologyTable.In:Cu uteni.TheLastGreatChal olithi Civilizationof

Europe.Bukarest.

Markevi hV.I.

1981 PozdnetripolskiyeplemenaSevernoyMoldavii. Kishinev.

MonahD.

1987 L adatationpar 14

C omplexe ulturelCu uteni-Tripolie.La ivilisationde

Cu uteni en ontexteEuropen:67-79.Iasi.

MooraKh.A.

1952 PamyatnikipozdnegoneolitairanneyepokhimetallavPribaltike.KSIIMK

48:3-9.Moskva.

MovshaT.G

1964 NovoyepozdnetripolskoyeposeleniyeTsviklovtsyvSrednemPodnestrovie.

SA1:131-145.

1965 Skarb prykrasz piznyotipillskogoposelennia v s. Tsviklivtsi.Arkheologiya

18:67-74.

1970 Pozdnetripolskoyeposeleniye vs.Zhvanets.KSIA123:84-93.

1971a Osevernoygruppepozdnetripolskikhpamyatnikov.SA15(1):31-54.

1971b Gon harniytsentrtripolskoykulturyna Dnestre.SA15(3):228-234.

1972 PeriodizatsiyaikhronologiyaserednogotapiznogoTripillya.Arkheologiya

5:3-24.

1973 Gorogys hetripolskoikulturyZhvanets-S hovb,AO1973:310-311.

1984 KhronologiaTripolye-Cu uteni i stepnyekulturyrannego metalla vyego

systemie. In: Problemy arkheologii Srednego Podneprovia, part 1, 60-83.

Dnepropetrovsk.

1985a VzaemovidnosiniTripilla |Kukuteniz sinkhronnimikulturamiT

sentral-noyEvropy.Arkheologiya51:22-31.

1985b Pozdniy etapTripolskoykultury.In: ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,vol. 1,

223-253.Kiev.

1993 Vzayemovidnisinystepovukhizemlerobskikhkulturvepohueneolotu|

ranniobronzovogoviku.|Arkheologiya3:36-51.

NazarovS.V.,N.N. Kovalyukh

(26)

histori -NeustupnyE.

1968 Absolute hronologyof theNeolithi andAeneolithi periodsinCentral

andSouth-EasternEurope.SlovenskaAr heologia15(1):19-60.

NikolovaA.V.

1992 Khronologi heskayaklassi katsiyapamyatnikovyamnoykulturystepnoyzony

Ukrainy.Avtoreferatdissertatsiinasoiskaniyeu henoystepenikandidata

isto-ri heskikhnauk.Kiev.

NikolovaA.V.,T.I.Ma hi h

1997 Dometodykiklasy katsiiposuduYamnoykultury.Arkheologiya3:101-114.

OstroverkhovA.S.

1981 An ientprodu tionof glassbeads intheNorthernBla k-Sea area.SA4:

214-228.

1985 SteklannyjebusyvpamyatnikahpozdnegoTripolya.In:Novyematerialypo

arkheologiiSevero-ZapadnogoPri hernomorya,174-179.Kiev.

Parzinger H.

1993 Studien zur Chronologie und Kulturges hi hte der Jungstein, Kupfer- und

Fr uhbronzezeit zwis hen Karpaten und mittlerem Taurus. R 

omish-Germa-nis heFors hungenB.52.Mainzam Rhein.

Passek T.S.

1940 Tripilskakultura. Kiev.

1949 Periodizatsiyatripolskikhposeleniy.MIA110.

1962 Relationsentrel'EuropeO identaleetl'EuropeOrientalal'epoque

neo-litique.VI CongresInternationaldesS ien es Prehistoriqueset

Protohistori-ques.Lesrapportsetlesinformations dear heologuesdel'URS S.Moskva.

PatokovaE.F.

1964 UsatovskijkurganI.KSOGAM12:102-123.

1970 Raskopki Usatovskogo beskurgannogo mogilnika. In: Arkheologi heskie

otkrytiyaza1969god:230. Moskva.

1971 Raskopki Usatovskogo beskurgannogo mogilnika v 1964 g. Materialy po

arkheologijiSevernogoPri hermomorya7:201-210.Odessa.

1974 RaskopkiUsatovskogomogilnika.Arkheologi heskieotkrytiyaza 1973god:

325.Moskva.

1979 Usatovskoyeposeleniyeimogilniki.Kiev.

PatokovaE.F.,V.G.Petrenko,N.B.Burdo, L.Y.Polish huk

1989 PamyatnikitripolskoykulturyvSevero-Zapadnom Pri hernomorye.Kiev.

(27)

Petrougne V.F.

1995 Petrograpi al- lihologi al hara teristi sofstonematerials fromL ate-T

ri-polye emeteriesoftheSo evkatype,In:CemeteriesoftheSo evkatype:

2950-2750BC, BPS3:190-199.

PetrovV.P.

1940 Poselennia vGorodsku.In:Tripilskakultura,339-381.Kiev.

vander Pli htJ.

1993 TheGroningenradio arbon alibrationprogram.Radio arbon35(1):

231--237.

vander Pli htJ.,W.G.Mook

1987 Automati radio arbon alibration:illustrativeexamples.Palaeohistoria29:

173-182.

vander Pli htJ.,W.G.Mooh, H.Hasper

1987 Automati Calibration ofRadio arbonAges. PACT29:81-94.

Polin S.V.,Tup henkoN.P., NikolovaA.V.

1992 KurganyverkhovyevIngultsa,1.Kiev.

1993 KurganyverkhovyevIngultsa,2.Kirovograd

1994 KurganyverkhovyevIngultsa,3.Kiev.

PopovaT.B.

1955 Plemena katakombnoy kultury. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Istori heskogo

Muzeya24.Moskva.

PustovalovS.Z.

1992 Etni heskaya struktura katakombnogonaselenia severnogo Pri hernomorya.

Kiev.

1994 E onomyandSo ial Organizationof theNorthernPonti Steppe |

Fo-rest-SteppePastoralPopulations:2750-2000BC(Cata omb Culture). In:

Nomadism andPastoralism in theCir le of Balti -Ponti EarlyAgrarian

Cultures.BPS2:86-134.

QuittaH., G.Kohl

1969 NeueRadio arbondatenzumNeolithikumundzumBronzezeit

Sudosteu-ropasundder Sowjetunion.ZFA3:223-318.

Ra zkyP.

1995 NewData ontheAbsoluteChronologyof theCopper Ageinthe

Carpa-thianBasin.In:T.Kova s(Ed.), NeuereDatenzurSiedlungsges hi hteund

Chronologieder KupferzeitdesKarpatenbe kens,52-56.Budapest.

RamseyC.B.

(28)

Pro-Reins hC.H,

1967 Smoothingbysplinefun tions.NumMathematik10:177-183.

RenfrewC.

1971 SitagroiRadio arbonandthePrehistoryofEurope.Antiquity45:275-282.

RimantieneR.

1984 AkmensamziusLietuvoje.Vilnius.

1994 DieSteinzeit inLitauen.Mainz amRhein.

RyndinaN.V.,L.V.Konkova

1982 Oproiskhozhdeniibolshykhusatovskikhkinzhalov.SA2:30-42.

SamoylovskiI.M.

1952 Tilospalniy mogilnikkolos.So yvka.AP4:121-123.

SementsovA.A.,E.N.Romanova,P.M. Dolukhanov

1969 RadiouglerodniyedatylaboratoriiLOIA.SA2:251-261.

SerdyukovaI.L.

1996 Contiribution to the origin of the Bronze Age in the Middle Dnieper

region. In: Easternexodus of the GlobularAmphora people: 2950-2350

BC,BPS4:133-155.

Sh hepinskyA.A.

1985 Kemi-obinskayakultura.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyS SR,vol.1,331-336.

ShmagliyM.M.

1960 O planirovke pozdne tripolskikh poselenij Vosto hnoj Vilyni. KSIA AN

US SR9:52-55.

1966 Gorodsko-volinskiyvariant piznyotripilskoykultury. Arkheologiya 20:

15--37.

1971 Pamiatkigorodskogotypu.ArkheologiyaUS SR1:205-210.Kiev.

ShternE.P.

1906 Dogre heskayakulturanayugeRossii.In:TrudyArkheologi heskogosyezda

vYekaterinislave v1905g.,vol.1:9-95.

Siemen P.

1991 ProblemsoftheSingleGraveCulture(EGK).In:DieKontinentaleu-rop

ai--s henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,Praha-Stirin1-6.10.1990.Die

ChronologiederregionalenGruppen.Zusammenfasungen, 89-95.Freiburgi

Br.

SkripkinV.V.,N.N.Kovalyukh

1998 Re entDevelopments inthePro eduresUsed attheSSCERL aboratory

fortheRoutinePreparationofLithiumCarbide.Radio arbon40:211-214.

(29)

StruveK.

1955 DieEinzelgrabkulturinS hleswig-Holsteinundihre kontinentalen

Beziehun-gen.Neum unster.

StuiverM., J.vanderPli htJ. (Eds.)

1998 INTCAL98.Radio arbon40(3):1041-1084.

SulimirskiT.

1959 Polskaprzedhistory zna,t.2(1957-1959),L ondyn.

1968 CordedWare andGlobularAmphoraeNorth-Eastof theCarpathians. L

on-don.

1970 Prehistori Russia.An outline.L ondon.

SveshnikovI.K.

1974 IstoriyanaselennyaPeredkarpattya,PodillaiVolinivkin iIII|napo hatku

IItys.don.e.Kiev.

1983 Kulturasharovidnykhamfor.SvodArkheologi heskikhisto hnikov,vyp.B

1-27.Moskva.

SzmytM.

1996a Spoªe zno± ikulturyamforkulisty hna Kujawa h. Pozna«.

1996b GlobularAmphora ulture in EasternEurope. Present state of resear h

and possibilities for future studies. In: Eastern exodus of the Globular

Amphorapeople: 2950-2350BC. BPS4:3-27.

1998 Die Kugelamphorenkulturunddie Gemeins haften derSteppen-Wald |

undSteppenzone Osteuropas. Der Fors hungsstandund

Fors hungsper-spektiweninGrundri.In:B.Hansel,J.Ma hnik [Eds.℄Das

Karpatenbe -kenundOsteuropais heSteppe.NomadenundKulturaustau hin

vor hristli-s henMetallzeiten(4000-500v.Chr.), 221-231.M un hen.

1999a Osadni twoludno± i kulturyamforkulisty h. In:A. Ko±ko (Ed.)

Ar he-ologi zne badania ratowni ze wzdªu» trasy gazo i¡gu tranzytowego,Vol. III

Kujawy,Part4,Osadni twokulturpó¹noneolity zny horazinterstadiumepok

neolituibr¡zu:3900-1400/1300B C.Pozna«.

1999b Between West and East. Globular Amphora people in Eastern Europe,

BPS8,inprint.

2000 TheAbsolute(Radio arbon)ChronologyoftheCentralandEasternGroup

oftheGlobularAmphoraCulture.In:J.Czebreszuk,J.M uller(Eds.)The

3rdMillennium B Cin CentralEurope in theLight of 14

C Dates.

Pozna«--Berlin,inprint.

‘ ibiorJ.

1992 Die S hnurkeramikkultur in der Sandomierz-Opatów-L ozone. In: Die

Kontinentaleuropais henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,

Praehi-stori a19:255-264.

(30)

‘ ibiorJ.,J.M.‘ ibior

1992 Gróbkultury eramiki sznurowej(KCS) na stanowisku59 w Zªotej. SpA

44:99-107.



SebelaL.

1991 Die Chronologie der S hnurkeramik in Mahren. In: Die

Kontinentaleu-ropais henGruppenderKulturmitS hnurkeramik,Praha-Stirin1-6.10.1990.

DieChronologie der regionalen Gruppen. Zusammenfasungen, 23-28.

Fre-iburgiBr.

TeleginD.Y.

1977 Obabsolyutnomvozrasteyamnoykulturyinekotoriyevoporsykhronologii

eneolitaYugaUkrainy.SA2:5-19.

1985 Radiokarbonne ta arkheomagnitne datuvannya tripilskoykultury.

Arkhe-ologiya52:10-22

1992 Obabsolyutnomvozrastekatakombnoykulturyporadiouglerodnym

opre-deleniyam. In: Noviye otkrytyai metodologi heskiyeosnovy

arkheologi he-skoykhronologii,68-73.St.Peterburg.

1994 ObrazzmeelokoiboginivTripolie: Drevneishieobsh hnostizemledeltzev

i skotovodovSevernogo Pri hernomoriya V tys. don.e. { Vv. do n.e.{

MaterialyMezdunarodnoi arkheologi heskoikonferen ii.Tiraspol:73-74.

TeleginD.Y., E.V.Sobotovi h,N.N. Kovalyu h

1978 Radiouglerodnoye datirovaniye arkheologi heskikh materialov. In:

Ispol-zovaniyemetodovyestestvennykhnaukvarkheologii,55-61.Kiev.

1981 Ob absolyutnomvozrastepamyatnikov arkheologiiUkrainy i nekotory h

smezhny hterritoriypodannymradiokarbonnykhanalizov. In:

Ispolzova-niyemetodovyestestvennykhnaukv arkheologii,78-84.Kiev.

Titov V.S.

1965 Rolradiouglerodnykhdatvkhronologiineolitaibronzovogoveka

Pered-neyAziii yugo-vosto hnoyEvropy.In:Arkheologiyaiyestestvennyenauki,

14-16.Moskva.

Tosh hevG.N.

1991 Zapadnyyarealpamyatnikovkatakombnoykultury.In:Katakombnyye

kul-turySevernogoPri hernomorya,85-100. Kiev.

TrifonovV.A.

1996 K absolutnomu datirovaniyu \mikenskogo" ornamenta epokhi razvitoy

bronzyEvrazii. In:ArkheologiyaiRadiouglerod1:60-64.

TuniaK.

(31)

VasilevI.G.,P.F.Kuznetsov,A.P.Semenova

1992 Pogrebeniyaznatiepo hibronzyvSrednemPovolzhe.In:Arkheolgi heskiye

vesti1:52-63.St.Peterburg.

VideikoM.Y.

1989 P ytannyakhronologijimidnigoviky.Arkheologiya3:107-111.

1990 Khronologiyaarkheologi hnykh pamyatokmidnogoviku.Arkheologiya3:

107-111.

1991 P ytannyaabsolyutnoykhronologydavnoyistoriiUkrainy.In:Problemy

vi-v henniataokhoronypamyatokarkheologiiKievs hyny,25-27.Kiev.

1994 Tripolye | \Pastoral" onta ts. Fa ts and hara ter of the intera tions:

4800-3200BC.In:Nomadismandpastoralisminthe ir leofBalti -Ponti

earlyagrarian ultures:5000-1650BC, BPS2:5-28.

1995 Cemeteries of the So evka type. Field resear h, state of publi ation of

sour es and general position in the systemati s of Trypolye ulture. In:

Cemeteries oftheSo evkatype:2950-2750,BPS3:3-14.

We hlerK.P.

1994 Zur Chronologie der Tripolje-Cu uteni-Kultur aufgrund von 14

C-Datie-rungen.Zeits hrift f urAr haologie28:7-21.

WarrenP.

1980 ProblemsofChronologyinCreteandtheAegeanintheThirdandEarlier

Se ondMillenium BC.AJA84,No.4:487-499.

Weninger, B.

1986 High-pre ision alibration of ar haeologi al radio arbon dates. In: A ta

Interdis iplinariaAr haeologi aIV,11-53.Nitra.

1993 Radio arbonCalibration

<

alKN

>

. April 1993. Dendroand Ar haeolo-gi alWiggleMat hing. K oln.

Wªodar zakP.

1998 Chronologiaabsolutna grupy krakowsko-sandomierskiejkultury eramiki

sznurowejnapodstawiedany hz mentarzyskw›ernika hGórny h.SpA

50:31-54.

Wªodar zakP., H.Kowalewska-Marszaªek

1998 Datowanie bezwzgldne zespoªu kultury pu harówdzwonowaty hz

San-domierza,SpA50:55-82.

YakarJ.

1979 TroyandAnatolianEarly Bronze Age Chronology.AnatolianStudies 29:

23-69.

YanitsL.Y.

1952 Pozdneneoliti heskiyemogilnikivEstonskoySSR.In:KSIIMK42:55-57.

(32)

ZakharukY.N.

1971 Tripilskakultura.In:ArkheologiyaUkrainskoyRSR,vol.1,177-179.Kiev.

ZakharukY.M.

1952 So ivskitilopalnimogilnik.AP 4:112-120

ZakharukJ.M., V.A.Kruts

1963 Raskopki pozdnetripolskogoposelenia us.So evka Borispolskogoraiona

Kievskoyoblasti.NAIANANU, FondEkspedi ij4410-4414-1963/8a.

Zbenovi hV.G.

1964 Raskopkibeskurgannogomogilnika vs.Usatovo.KSOGAM 37-45.

1971 Pamyatky usativskogotypu.In: ArkheologiyaUkrainskoy RSR, vol.1,

187--193.Kiev.

1974 PozdnetripolskiyeplemenaSevernogoPri henomorya.Kiev.

1976a KproblemesviazeyTripolyaseneoliti heskimikulturamiPri hernomorya.

In:EneolitibronzoviyvekUkrainy,57-59.Kiev.

1976b PozdneyeTripolyeiyegosvyazskulturamiPrikarpatyaiMalopolshi.A ta

(33)

IvanI.Chernyakov

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

ElkeKaiser

Seminarf urUr-undFrehgesi hte

FreieUniversitatBerlin

Altensteinstrae15

14195Berlin

Germany

ViktorI.Klo hko

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

AleksanderKo±ko

InstituteofPrehistory

AdamMi kiewi zUniversity

±w.Mar in78

61-809Pozna«

Poland

E-mail:koskomman.poznan .pl

NikolayN.Kovalyukh

DepartmentofEnvironmentalRadiogemistry

InstituteofGeo hemistry

andPhysi sofMinerals

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Palladina34

252142Kiev

Ukraine

VladimirA.Kruts

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

MykolaN.Kryvaltsevi h

InstituteofHistory

A ademyofS ien esofBelarus

F.Skaryna1

Minsk220072

VadimL.L akiza

InstituteofHistory

A ademyofS ien esofBelarus

F.Skaryna1

Minsk220072

Belarus

JanMa hnik

InstituteofAr haeologyandEtnology

PolishA ademyofS ien es

Sªawkowska19

31-016Kraków

Poland

SergeyV.Nazarov

DepartmentofEnvironmentalRadiogemistry

InstituteofGeo hemistry

andPhysi sofMinerals

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Palladina34

252142Kiev

Ukraine

AllaV.Nikolova

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

GeroivStalingrada12

254655Kiev

Ukraine

VadimV.Skripkin

DepartmentofEnvironmentalRadiogemistry

InstituteofGeo hemistry

andPhysi sofMinerals

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Palladina34

252142Kiev

Ukraine

MarzenaSzmyt

InstituteofEasternStudies

AdamMi kiewi zUniversity

Nowowiejskiego55

61-734Pozna«

Poland

E-mail:marzenamain.am u.e du. pl

MihailoY.Videiko

InstituteofAr haeology

UkrainianA ademyofS ien es

Vydubi kaya40

252014Kiev

(34)

CenturiesB.C., byViktorI.Klo hko.

Vol.2:NomadismandPastoralismintheCir leofBalti {Ponti EarlyAgrarian

Cultures: 5000{1650B C,editedbyAleksanderKo±ko

Vol.3: CemeteriesoftheSo evkatype:2950{2750B C, editedbyAleksander

Ko±ko

Vol.4: Eastern Exodus of the Globular Amphora People: 2950 - 2350 B C,

editedbyAleksanderKo±ko.

Vol.5: BeyondBalkanization,edited byLu ynaDoma«ska,KenJa obs and

Aleksander Ko±ko.

Vol.6:TheTrz inie AreaoftheEarlyBronzeAgeCivilization:1950{1200B C,

editedbyAleksanderKo±ko.

Orders regardingB-PS should beadressed dire tlyto theEditorialOÆ e

(Balti -Ponti Studies,InstituteofPrehistory,‘w.Mar in78,61-809Pozna«,

Poland).

Thepubli ationsis arriedoutwithintheresear hproje tNo.1H01G05912

(in part No. 1H01G01810) nan ed in the years 1997{1999 by the

(35)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Tłumaczy się to zapew ne niebanalnym, jak na wywód nauko­ wy, zaangażowaniem emocjonalnym (autorka zdaje sobie z niego sprawę, s. 15), który zdaje się jednakow oż trudny

Vergeleken met de controlewijk, zien we dat het aandeel personen dat in beide jaren werk als voor- naamste inkomensbron heeft en in hetzelfde gebied woont in Hoogvliet een stuk

In het algemeen geldt dat door de aanleg van kabels en leidin- gen het waterkerend vermogen van de dijk niet mag worden verminderd. Dit geldt ook voor aspecten als erosie. Vooral

Koronnym argumentem, który nie pozwala wydać arbitralnej opinii w sprawie wykonania rytmu partii prawej ręki w Preludium E-dur, a o którym nie wspominają w swo- im

Człowiek m oże decydować się na wybór środków prow a­ dzących do celu ostatecznego (Boga), aktywizując w ten sposób swoją wolę40. Dowodzi, że z jednej strony

Nabożeństwo do św.. Jest nim nabożeństwo w in tencji osoby ukąszo­ nej przez w ściekłego psa, połączone m. Theraponem, skądinąd nieznanym. kapłan i m ęczennik

&#34;Teologia życia wewnętrznego ludzi świeckich&#34;, Eugeniusz Weron,. Poznań-Warszawa 1980 : [recenzja] Studia Theologica Varsaviensia

1996 Absolute hronology of the eastern group of Globular Amphora ulture. In: Eastern exodus of the Globular Amphora people: