Delft University of Technology
Capacity drop: A relation between the speed in congestion and the queue discharge rate
Yuan, K; Knoop, VL; Hoogendoorn, SP Publication date
2015
Document Version Final published version Citation (APA)
Yuan, K., Knoop, VL., & Hoogendoorn, SP. (2015). Capacity drop: A relation between the speed in
congestion and the queue discharge rate. Poster session presented at Transportation Research Board 94th annual meeting, Washington, United States.
Important note
To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy
Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology.
Delft University of Technology
Transport & Planning
China Scholarship Council
中国国家留学基金管理委员会 中国国家留学基金管理委员会 中国国家留学基金管理委员会 中国国家留学基金管理委员会((((CSC)))) Kai Yuan Victor L. Knoop Serge P. Hoogendoorn
Capacity Drop: A Relation Between The Speed In
Congestion and The Queue Discharge Rate
Abstract
It has been empirically observed for years that the queue discharge rate is lower than the pre-queue capacity. This is called the capacity drop. The magnitude of capacity drop varies over a wide range depending on the local traffic conditions. However, up to now it is unknown what determines the capacity drop value. In fact, there is still no thorough empirical analysis revealing a reliable relation between the congestion level and the capacity drop. This paper tries to fill in the gap by revealing the relation between the vehicle speed in congestion and the queue discharge rate through empirical analysis. The queue discharge rate is shown to increase considerably with increasing speed in the congestion. This finding indicates a promising speed-control scheme for increasing queue discharge rates.
•
Lane-drop bottleneck
•
On-ramp bottleneck
• Two freeways (A4 & A12) in the Netherlands;
• Lane-drop & On-ramp bottlenecks
• 1 min aggregated loop data
• 6 days of observations (3 days for each site)
Project: there is plenty of room in the other lane
• Analyze a traffic scenario: a bottleneck gets active immediately after a stop-and-go wave passes
• Apply shock wave analysis to identify traffic situations
• Apply slanted cumulative counts to calculate queue discharge rates
• Speed in stop-and-go wave is the average of all the lowest speed in downstream locations when wave passes
• Speed in standing queue is the average of speed at location close to congestion front
• Analyses data in different weather and freeways to see whether it is necessary to do situation-specific validation
Shock Wave Analysis
Methodology
a) Fundamental diagram b) x—t plot
Freeway A4
10 9 7 8 5 6 3 4 1 2 Traffic flow Study bottleneck Exit 7Freeway A12
Study Sites
7 Traffic flow Study bottleneck Exit 6 8 5 6 3 4 1 2 10 9• Around 500m between every two detect locations
• At least 3.5km homogeneous freeway section in the downstream of the bottleneck
• Two sunny days and one rainy day (March 18, 2011) of observations on freeway A12
• Three sunny days of observations on Freeway A4
c) Fundamental diagram d) x—t plot
Flow increases Observation location Flow increases Observation location
Delft University of Technology
Transport & Planning
China Scholarship Council
中国国家留学基金管理委员会 中国国家留学基金管理委员会 中国国家留学基金管理委员会
中国国家留学基金管理委员会((((CSC))))
Conclusions
As the speed in congestion
decreases, the outflow decreases
substantially. In this study, the range of speed in congestion is broad
enough, from 6 km/h to 60 km/h.
The flow at three-lane section ranges from 5220 veh/h to 6840 veh/h. The quantitative relation requires
calibration because discharge rates are greatly influenced by local traffic situations, such as weather and
proposition of trucks. The finding can provide fundamental theory for
promising control strategies. Kai Yuan, Msc
TRAIL Research School Delft University of Technology
Transport & Planning k.yuan@tudelft.nl Transportation Research Board
94th Annual Meeting, January 11-15, 2015 Paper nr. 15-4064 0 20 40 60 80 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 Speed in congestion (km/h)
Queue discharge rate (veh/h)
relation
Empirical data in A4 Empirical data in A12
Rainy day (8.8mm, A12) Linear fitting discharge 29 congestion 5000 Q = ⋅ v + 16:00 17:00 18:00 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 12 km 10 km 8 km 6 km 4 km 2 km 0 km 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Speed (km/h)
17:00
17:30
18:00
18:30
0 km
0.5 km
1 km
1.2 km
2 km
2.5 km
3 km
3.5 km
0
50
100
Speed (km/h) 3.5 km 3 km 2.5 km 2 km 1.5 km 1 km 0.5 km 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 0 km 100 50 0A4, May 28, 2009 A12, March 24, 2011
• The bottleneck got activated immediately after a stop-and-go wave passes by • The downstream traffic states of
congestion are free flow
A4, May 28, 2009 A12, March 24, 2011
• Observe the traffic flow at the location furthest downstream
• Traffic remains in free flow state after the
passing of a stop-and-go wave
• Flow increases if the outflow of the
stand-ing queue reaches the downstream point
• Shock wave theory predicts this
Data
Observations
Relation between speed in congestion and queue discharge rates
• A linear equation can fit the relation between the speed in congestion and the queue discharge rate very well
• When the speed in congestion is high enough, the observed queue discharge rates in this study can be much higher than three-lane pre-queue capacity (6300 veh/h) on freeways with a higher percentage of trucks (15%)