3 SEP.
84ARCHIEF
SYMPOSIUM ON
"HYDRODYNAMICS OF SHIP AND OFFSHORE PROPULSION SYSTEMS"
H0VIK OUTSIDE OSLO, MARCH 20. - 25. 1977
"CAVITATION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON INDUCED HULL PRESSURE AMPLITUDES"
By
E. A. WEITENDORF
Hamburg University/Hamburg Model Tank
SPONSOR: DET NORSKE VERITAS
PAPER 9/2 - SESSION 3
(ç)
Lab. y. Scheepsbouwkijnde
Technische Hogeschool
Abstract
Introduction
Measurements and Calculations of Propeller-excited
Pressure-Amplitudes
Measurements and Calculations of the Pressure
Fields on Propeller Blades
Influence of Undissolved Air Content ori Cavitation
Phenomena at the Propeller Blades and on Induced
Hull Pressure Amplitudes
Theoretical Research on Cavitation Inception
with Application of Bubble Dynamics
Conclusion
References
i
Abstract
A critical review of the following subjects is given:
Measurement and Calculation 9f_Propeller excited
Pressure-Ampli-tudes.
It was found that in the case of heavily cavitating frigate pro-pellers a decrease of the pressure amplitudes occurs in front of and directly above the propeller compared with noncavitating
condit-ions. Behind the propeller plane the cavitating tip vortex with nodes having a mean diameter of about 3 to 5 per cent of the screw diameter amplifies the pressure impulses. By means of theoretical and experimental investigations it could be proved that the wave
length (i.e. distance between two nodes) of the cavitating tip vortex causes amplitudes of discrete frequencies. The wave length
itsSelf depends on the meandiameterof the cavitating vortex and the
cavitation number. If the wave lenght0 attains a value corres-ponding to the number of propeller blades e.g. = 1200 for a three
bladed propeller, the amplitudes of the blade frequency will be amplified. Analog effects will happen at twice the blade frequency with a wave length of = 60°.
Measurement and Calculation of the Pressure Fields on Propeller
Blades.
The measurement of the instationary pressures at 235 points on the blades of a 1.40 m model propeller were executed in a ship-like wake
in a wind tunnel at Göttingen. The results of these measurements at Göttingen are compared with the results of an instationary lifting surface theory. For one case they agree very well, but from another
case of comparison (HSVA-Propeller 1917) it seems, that the results of the lifting surface theory do not reach the values of the real pressure distribution of the propeller investigated.
3. Influence of Undissolved Ajr_Conten on Cavitation Phenomena at
the Propeller Blades and on nquced_Hyl] Pressure Amplitud_es.
This investigation consisted of the application of the Scatterad Light Technique for measuring the undissolved air content of a
cavi-tation tunnel and simultaneous measurements of propeller-excited
pressure amplitudes on a flat plate above the propeller.
The main results of the measurements are:
Increasing relative free gas volume for cavitation tests and higher revolutions of the model propeller in a wake causes
earlier inception and increase in the size of the cavity and therefore increasing nondimensional pressure amplitudes.
Cavitation tests for estimating the propeller-excited pressure
amplitudes should include the simultaneous determination of the relative free gas content and later on its possible con-trol
4. Theoretical Research on CavitationjnceptionwithApplication
of Bubble Dynamics.
The theoretical research on this subject uses as input the nuclei distribution measured in the above mentioned point 3. Not only the pressure field for a two phase flow around a hydrofoil is
cal-culated but also the growth of single bubbles in this pressure field. The result complementing the above point 3. is that the
greater number of smaller bubbles with a diameter less than 1Ojrn
have an important influence on the cavitation phenomena, if the
tation research con' ducted at the Institut für Schiffbau of the
Hamburg University within the Special Research Pool
"Schiffs-technik und Schiffbau" (SFB 98) during the last four years.
Since there were several activities in this field, it is impossible to describe them all in detail. That is feasible only for those topics which are directly implied by the title. Others can only
be mentioned by way of suggestion in this introduction.
For instance Laudan [1] has complemented the Wageningen "four-quadrant" measurements of propellers
12)
in open water. Heper-formed the "four quadrant" propeller measurements in a quasi-steady manner using four typical ship models in front of the propellers.
In this way global statements about the wake fraction and thrust deduction fraction were found: the wake fraction remains constant from the condition of operation to the reversing point, afterwards decreasing to zero. On the other hand the thrust deduction fraction
diminishes in a linear way from the point of operation to a nega-tive value.
In an additional investigation Laudan [3 measured the influence
of the cavitation on the propeller-forces occuring during crash stops on straight courses. The measurements were performed in a cavitation tunnel in a quasi steady way. For the propellers used here it was shewn that the influence of the cavitation was not excessive. But at least the result was that the stopping time was prolonged by 20 per cent and the stopping distance was
2
Furthermore this project "Safety against collision" of the SFB 98 investigated the influence of oblique flow on the propeller having different advance angles [4 and made threedimensional wake measure-ments during oblique towing of the ship model [5]. But now results are to be presented,whose origin concerns the author directly.
2. Measurement and Calculation of Propeller-excited Pressure
Ampi itudes
2.1. Measurements of Pressure Amplitudes for heavil, cavitatinS
In order to study the influence of cavitation on the blade fre-quency pressures for heavily cavitating frigate propellers of different design, measurements with seven pressure pick-ups on a flate plate (Fig. 1) were carried out in the medium sized cavitation
tunnei of the Hamburg Model Basin (HSVA). These investigations [6] contain numereous results with a wide variation of the main para-meters of these three, four - and five biaded propellers having a
blade area ratio of about AE . 0.72. The essential results of
the experimental investigat9ons, which are qualitively not only
valid for homogeneous but also for inhomogeneous flow, can be
found in Fig. 2.
Here the nondimensional pressure amplitude
K -
IP
P3 -
Qn
Dais plotted against the coordinate in flow direction x/R. The figure concerns homogeneous Flow. The upper diagram stands for a
propeller (HSVA-Propeller 1240), whose maximal circulation or
loa-ding is drawn to inner radii, the lower stands for an optimal
pro-peller (HSVA-Propro-peller 1283). Both propro-pellers possess three blades. Parameter of the curves is the cavitation number
VA
9VA
In this definition VA means the speed of advances of the propeller.
The solid curves are valid for the cavitation free condition of the propeller, i.e. there was an open connection between the test section of the tunnel and the atmosphere. The procedure of the tests was that the pressure in the tunnel was reduced step by step. So
the cavitation numbers,given in the legend of the figure, were reached. For the optimal propeller the following result for the
cavitating condition was found:
In front of and directly above the propeller plane a decrease of the pressure amplitude occurs when compared with the cavitation-free condition. The decrease of the pressure amplitude by cavitation
O-VA Pv
4
can be explained in the following manner:
The propeller excited pressure amplitude is caused by two influ-ences, i.e. the thickness and the loading of the blade. Since in case of heavy cavitation the thrust breaks down, the loading fluence can be reduced more than the thickness influence will in-crease from cavitation. The smaller dein-crease of the amplitudes for the "noiseless" propeller in the upper diagram is due to the greater
cavitation-free area of this propeller.
Behind the plane of propeller 1283 the increase of the amplitudes, compared with the cavitation free condition (ATM), is caused by the cavitating tip vortex. Already by observing the stroboscopic photographs of both propellers in Fig.3 the influence of the
cavitating tip vortex on the pressure amplitudes can be detected: The optimal propeller 1283 possesses a thick tip vortex and accord-ingly in Fig. 2 an increase of the amplitudes. On the contrary
the noise-less propeller 1240 shows very little of a cavitatirig
tip vortex in Fig. 3 and correspondingly no amplification of the amplitudes behind the propeller plane in Fig. 2. In order to avoid misunderstanding at the end of this chapter, it must be stressed
that this practice of unloading the propeller ip can only be
applied for propellers in wake fields of fast ships, mainly navy
ships.
-2.2. Investigations of the Cavitating Ti2 Vortex with nodes
Looking more precisely in Fig. 4 at some cavitating tip vortices
in homogeneous flow, the following can be discovered:
At constant advance coefficient, buecreasing cavitation number
VA the cavitating tip vortex becomes more and more thick.
Finally this vortex shows nodes at regular intervals which are marked by arrows in the photographs of Fig. 4. These notes are stationary with respect to the running propeller. The positions of the nodes are determined by the mean radius of the tip vortex and by the cavitation number dVA. This was already shown 1930 by Ackeret [7J . Turning with the propeller, this cavitating tip vortex
contracted at different positions causes pressure amplitudes of discrete frequencies, depending on the wave length of the vortex,
i.e. the distance between two nodes.
In the theoretical investigations [8J of this physical phenomenon the pressure impulses,created by the cavitating tip vortex, were regarded as an effect of displacement. This was simulated by suitable source-sink-distributions, arranged on the spiral line described by the propeller tip in operation. Now it is imaginable that the pressure amplitude, created by the displacement of a body, is proportional to the variation of the cross-section of this body,
namely
d. F'x)
K"'p-'-
pif x is the circumferential coordinate. In the calculations the
r
area of the cross-section F(x) of the cavitating tip vortex
-
2.
F)
sin2(i
(-XA)(-)
R R "-e
/
L'
(_XA)a
is built up of two parts: the round bracket stands for the
wave-like and cavitating hollow vortex (sketch No. 1), and the square
bracket for the ellipsoidal hollowYThe designations in the round
kec
No'f
T
kec No'f
bracket for the wave-like hollow vortex are:
number of blades,
inner and outer radius of the propeller blade,
= thrust coefficient,
= advance coefficient,
nD
amplitude of the cross-section of the tip vortex,
to be taken from photographs,
= wave length of the hollow vortex in the theory
m
(2.1) RcL Z)»XAxL
rn RcL Z)»XAxL
rn L rn N = =Ram
= ar-
T ivRK = the mean radius of the cavitating tip vortex,
RK '16 K. '1 (2.2) (2.2) K K V 'u
= circumferential coordinate
The designations in the square bracket for the ellipsoidal hollow
vortex (ketc.b
P.Io2') are-r
Skcch Wo
2= initial value of the hollow vortex
A
XE = final value of the hollow vortex,
m = parameter of inclination.
The cross-sections applied in the theoretical investigations correspond to formula (2.1). Some examples of cavitating tip vortices used in the calculations are shown in Fig. 5.
i In the calculations the value x= O lies at
the position of the lifting line vortex of the propeller blade, i.e. the 1/4 - point of the propeller profile. The different in-fluences of the shape parameters in formula (2.1), namely
Rk = the mean radius of the cavitating tip vortex,
Ram
= the amplitude of the cross-section of the tipvortex,
= the wave length,
= the mitai value,
= the phase angle,
m = the parameter of inclination,
were investigated in a computer program. In order to enable com-parisons with the present measurements [6] , the computer program contains all contributions of the propeller excited pressure
am-plitudes, namely .the influence of the loading of the blades,
in-cluding the steady cavitation, the influence of the thickness of the blades and the influence of the wave-like cavitating tip vortex with its effect of displacement. In the detailed report Ç8J all re-suits of these calçulations are given. But here the results of the variation of the wave length only can be shown in Fig. 6.
This figure contains two diagrams, the upper results are valid for the third harmonic order of the pressure fluctuations (blade frequency) and the lower for twice the blade frequency. The non-dimensional pressure amplitudes K3 and K6 are plotted against the flow direction x/R4. Behind the propeller plane in the region
x/R > 1.0 the normal contribution of the propeller, i.e. thick-ness and loading effects of the blades have vanished. This is the reason for showing the results up to x/R = 2.0. Parameter of the
different curves in Fig. 6 is the wave length x0.If the wave lengtn x0 attains the value = = 1200 for N = 3., then the
third harmonic of the pressure will be the strongest amplitude. If the wave lengthx0 is equal 600, twice the blade frequency will
be th91greatest. This can clearly be found in Fig. 6. The
oscillat-ions of different curves in Fig. 6 are due to the wave length.
Since these contracted tip vortices leaving the different blades are stationary with the positionof their nodes with respect to the propeller, all respective nodes of different blades must be in one
plane. This plan is located parallel to the propeller plane. The distances between two such planes, corresponding to the oscillation in Fig. 6, are equal to the value x/R = =
x0.
As the theory by Ackeret
[73
shows, the wave length x depends on the mean radius of the cavitating hollow vortex. In the presentinvestigation [8] this statement was also confirmed for the spiral
curved tip vortex of a propeller. Ackeret's result namely was valid for a straight hollow vortex. The mean radius of the cavitating tip vortex depends on the cavitation number, the propeller loading and is inversely proportional to the blade number, as can be seen
in formula (2.2). In this way all dependencies not only
for
thewave length X0 but also formean drnet'r
of
the cavitating tipvortex are formulated. But the merely theoretical calculation of the pressure amplitudes of a cavitating tip vortex with nodes is not feasible, for the position of the first node, the initial and final value of the vortex and its shape amplitude rkam can only be
ob-tained from measurements. From photograph of corresponding tests these value are gathered. The va1uesare used for the calculations
For the purpose of comparison the results of the measurements are given additionally, obtained with the five pressure pick-ups located along the direction of flow (see Fig. 1). In Fig. 7 results of calculations and measurements for J = 0.72 up to the 9th har-manic order are given for the cavitation numbers
p-pv
- 2.0, 1.75, 1.50, 1.25 and 1.14.
VA
- Q
V
-Comparing the results of calculations and measurements, a quite satisfactory agreement can be found, especially for = 1.75.
For this case an exellent agreement occurs, above all at the position P 4 and P 5, where the cavitating tip vortex is of do-minating influence. For this case not only photographs but also coloured slides were available. These were used for determining the shape parameters of the vortex needed for the calculations. Here one can see, how important the accurate determination of the shape parameters is. Only if the input values of the computer program conform to reality, an agreement between measurement
and calculation can be obtained.
In order to avoid the drawback of every time having to take
photographs for the input data of the computer program, empirical formulas for the shape parameters of the tip vortex were
develop-ed
{3
. By means of these emperical formulas, it seems possibleto compute approximately the pressure fluctuations caused by cavitating tip vortices without having to take photographs. At the end of this chapter the following concluding remarks on
3 13 3
-the influence of -the cavitating tip vortex with nodes shall be
given:
Not only by measurements but also by calculation it was proved that the cavitating tip vortex with nodes, having a mean diameter of about 4 per cent of the propeller diameter, causes greater am-plitudes of higher blade frequencies. These can be observed in full
scale and model measurements. The phenomenon of these nodes occurs in a ship wake too.
An additional aim should be the calculation of the cavitating tip vortex with nodes in a ship wake. Preliminary calculation of this problem are already carried out for single screw container ships using the above mentioned computer program in a quasi steady manner for different loadings of the propeller in the wake. The result was that the pressure amplitude excited by the cavitating vortex was of minor magnetude compared with the other
con-tributions of the propeller. A concluding statement about the influence of the cavitating tip vortex with nodes in a wake can only be drawn after having performed extensive theoretical in-stationary calculations. It is imaginable that the inin-stationary variation of the shape of the cavitating tip vortex in the wake may generate pressure amplitudes of the same magnitude as the
other exitations of the propeller.
3. Measurement and Calculatlon of the Pressure Fields on Pro2eller
Blades
the propeller, the inflow condition at the stern as well as the
pressure distribution on the pressure and suction side of the blades is needed. Regarding the pressures n the propeller,
auxiliary means consist of calculations of the unsteady lifting surface theory and measurements. In cooperation between the In-stitut für Schiffbau Hamburg (Special Research Pool 98) and the Aerodynamische Versuchsanstalt (AVA) in Göttingen measurements of the pressure distributions on both side of a model propeller were carried out in a wind tunnel with a cross-section of
g m2 [10, iiJ. The tests were performed in a ship like wake flow.
On the 4 blades of the 1,4 meter wide model 235 orifices were distributed, mostly concentrated at the leading edges and the
outer radii. The measurements were performed by means of the
so called "indirect method", i.e. the 235 orifices were connected to one pressure pick-up using five scanning valves. In this way a calibration of àlitude and phase was necessary for each orifice. In the figures 8 to 10 for instance, results of the measured
-15-pressure distributions for the radii r/R = 0.50, 0.90 and 0,975
are shown. Here the nondimensional pressure coefficient
p-p0
CPI CUP QW
R
is plotted against the relative position along the chordlength
xii (x = distance from leading edge, 1 = chord length).
X/
With the exception of the blade tip (see Fig. 1O),the influenceof the inhomogeneous inflow (ship wake) is concentrated on the fore part of the chord, i.e. xii < 05. The influence becomes dominant at the leading edge. The lowest pressure, giving a
pressure coefficient = -0,362 at the blade position y'0 = 30°
at chord station x/l = 0.007, was found on the radius r/R = 0.80.
The influence of the tip vortex can be seen in Fig. 10 for the suction side. The great pressure differences between pressure and suction side at the trailing edge indicate the threedimens-ionai flow around the blade tip, being typical for the tip vortex
rolling up.
The choice of air as fluid medium has the advantage that no cavitation can occur. The eperimental parameters were such that the flow remained incompressible so that the incompressible lifting surface theory could be applied for the calculations.
Hence suitable possibility for the comparison between the re-suits from theory and measurements is available. Furthermore, by using such a big model of 1.4 meter dianeter, the orifices for the measurements could be placed very near to the leading edge. On the other hand, a drawback of using air as the fluid
17
-medium was the lower density of air compared with water. This leads to smaller pressure difference between suction and pressure side, approximately 0.025 bar. Above all, using the "indirect method" of pressure testing, these small pressure differences could only be obtained with a lowered accuracy. To some extent, the determination of the zero level for the pressure coefficient gave rise to certain difficulties, which only could be overcome by most precise measurements of the atmospheric pressure during the repeat tests. AU in all, the AVA in Göttingen estimates the error of the whole medsurement at ± 5 per cent with respect to the experience with other measuring techniques. This value
of 5 per cent seerî to be pretty good. Here it cannot be de-cided whether the pressure differences at the leading edge could be measured with the necessary accuracy considering the
ine-vitable inaccuracies of manufacturing in the profiles of the model propeller. This is the occcasion to give the hint that
the AVA in Göttingen at this moment is pursuing the fundamental
problem of measuring pressure differences on foils of rotating
systems. The result of this investigation may give an additional insight into the accuracy of the propeller measuremnt reported here. Nevertheless this propeller measurement leads to the
possibility of comparing the results of lifting surface theories. For this reason these wind tunnel tests were ordered by the
Special Research Pool (SFB 98), in order to compare the results of a computer program [121 based on the lifting surface theory [13] developed at the Institut für Schiffbau of the Hamburg
University.
19
-results from AVA [u] and the -results of the hamburg calculation
[12] for the position = 00 (12 o'clock position) and = 3300 (starboard) at the radius r/R = 0.90. For this case the agreement
between computation and test seems pretty good. But using the same computer program for the HSVA-propeller 1917 leads to a
substantially different picture in Fig. 13. For both the blade
positions = 0° and = 3300 (starboard) the cavity lengths
at the radius r/Rq = 0.90 for the cavitation number
n
p - p Q12 (irnD)
= 0.211
are shown. In the calculation the vapour pressure, corresponding
to = 0.211, is only obtained for ten per cent of the chord
length, whereas the real cavity lenght of a corresponding
cavitation test is extended over 55 per cent of the chord length
(see Fig. 18, upper row). This suggests that the mere application
of the cavitation number of the prototype is insufficient. It could be important to take into consideration the dynamics of
the cavitating gas bubbles additionally.
Corresponding to the blade position p0 = 330° in Fig.13, the vapour pressure corresponding Ön = 0.211, which is approximately necessary for the cavitation inception, is not attained in the calculations. This statement gives rise to the assumption that the pressure distribution of the computer program [123 does not fit the real values of the propeller pressures of a cavitation
test.
21
to compute the circulation distribution of the HSVA propeller 1917
in an axial model wake. This circulation can be used for the
cal-culation of the blade frequency pressure without cavitation on a
flate plate [8). The result is shown in Fig. 14. Again the
the-oretical values do not match the measurements. Once more the suspicion rises that the computer program [123 gives too small pressure differences between pressure and suction side compared with the reality. On the other hand, it must be admitted that
the calculated blade frequency pressures on a flate plate do not indicate whether the calculated pressure differences on the
blades are right or wrong. For instance, computations of the
pressure differences on the blades of the HSVA-propeller 1917
Hamburg
ordered by the Institut für Schiffbaifrom another institute gave unsatisfactory results, inspite of better agreement of the
simutaneously calculated calculated blade frequency pressures
on a flat plate with the measurements in Fig. 14.
Concerning the calculations of the pressure differences on the propeller blades in a ship wake by means of the lifting surface theory, it would be of utmost interest to see what the comparison
f different lifting surface theories proposed by the ITTC would look like. Beside the AVA-model propeller the HSVA-propeller 1917 (Zeise-design) would offer a suitable object for purposes of
at the Propeller Blades and on Induced Hull Pressure Amplitudes In a paper on propeller-excited hull forces given in 1972 by van Oossanen and van der Kooy [14], it was evident that for equal nondimensional flow conditions but different absolute
revolutions (i.e. n = 20 and n = 30 Hz), the nondiriiensional
propeller-excited pressure amplitudes were different. That means an uncertainty with respect to the evaluation of the vibratory
behavior of a ship.
Two possible influences concerning these differences were taken
into account:
the influence of the neglected Froude law of similarity and
the free air content of the tunnel water.
Using the Froude law of similarity, the correct pressure distribution on,the propeller blades in radial direction is
guaranteed. But normally the revolution based on the Froude number can not be realized, because it is out of the range of
a normal cavitation tunnel
With respect to the free air content, this content of the tunnel water, i.e. the free gas bubbles of test water, governs the
cavitation inception.
Taking the above mentioned influences into account as much as possible, new tests were performed in the medium sized cavitation tunnel of the Hamburg Model Basin in November and December of 1974. The axial component of the flow field in the propeller plane
23
-was simulated by grids of varying density.
Three kinds of measurements were executed simultaneously:
Measurement of the undissolved air content by the laser light
scattering method.
Measurement of the propeller-excited pressure amplitudes
on a flat plate above the propeller.
Stereometric photography of the extension of the cavitation
on the propeller blades.
In this lecture a short review of the above mentioned
measure-ments under number 1) and 2) shall be given. A more detailed description of these measurements was given in the IfS-Report
312 A [15).
The scattered light technique was applied in close cooperation with A. Keller of the Technical University Munich. He developed this method up to practical application of cavitation tests 1163. In our case of applicatiothe optical control volume defined by the cross-sectional dimensions of the light beam and the optics of the system detecting the scattered light had a cross-section of 1.2 mm2. The control volume was located in front of the propeller plane. Directly behind the control volume, the flow velocity was measured by a Prandtl tube. The flow velocity is required for
the estimation of nuclei concentration of the fluid. The ca-libration of the photomultiplier used as tne scattered light
detector was performed with latex spheres of known diameter.
These were injected into the control volume. The electrical
output pulses of the photomultiplier which are proportional to
the unucleusl size were evaluated by an HP-computer in an
on-line mode. Thereby, it was possible to print a nucleus size
histogram immediately after each test.
For the example of degassed water, a histogram is shown in Fig. 16.
The abscissa is the size of the bubbles measured in the range
between 20 and 350 microns.
The recommendation of the ITTC Cavitation Committee, taken
into consideration in this case, is the following that the nuclei size should be measured from 10 to 250 microns in diameter..The dashed line in Fig. 16 is the size histogram. Additionally, the diagram contains the fraction of the relative free gas
volumec4. per bubble range (full line). The relative free gas
volumek is the ratio of all measured gas bubbles per volume unit to the volume unit of the fluid. As mentoned, the full line represents the fraction of all measured relative free gas volumes per bubble range, i.e. between 20 and 69,6 microns. Summing up all the fractions of the relative free gas volumes per range, we obtain the total measured relative free gas volume, i.e.
c= 0.118 x 10 in the figure.
By gassing and degassing, it was possible to vary the free air content of the test water in a rather wide range. For the case of gassed water, the respective figure like Fig. 16 contains
a greater number of bubbles and greater relative free gas volumec..
After and before each test series the total air content c0 was determined by a van-Slyke-apparatus.
25
-As mentioned before the propeller-excited pressure amplitudes were measured on a flat plate above the propeller. The sketch of
the test setup and positions of pressure pickups were shown in Fig. 1. The first tests of the heavely cavitating frigate propeller (HSVA-propeller 1283) with open water conditions were performed without artificially changing the free gas
con-tent of the tunnel water. The purpose of this procedure was to find the connection to experimental results gained in 1972
161. The free gas volume changed in a way which is probably normal during a testing duration of eight to ten hours. The
results of these tests are the following that in case of existing cavitation the nondimensional pressure amplitudes of the blade
frequency are not affected by the free air content or by the chosen propeller revolutions. This result is confirmed by the
extension of the cavitation photographed.
In contrast to this instance of existing cavitation the relative
free gas volumed,. has an extreme influence on the pressure
amplitudes K = of a propeller in a wake. In Fig. 17
some results of pressure amplitudes of the model propeller of S.S. "Sydney Express" (HSVA-propeller 1917 - Zeise-design) are shown. Here the nondimensional pressure amplitudes K5
of the middle pickup (position 3) are shown for the advance
coefficient = 0.61 and the cavitation number
=
PPv
=0.211n
Ç/2 (TrnD)2
27
-The abscissa is the measured relative free gas volume.. -The pa-rameter of the diagram is the chosen number of revolutions, i.e. n = 15, 20 and 30 Hz, that means different pressure conditions
in the test section according to the law of similarity of equal cavitation numbers. Mainly for the revolutions of n = 15 and n = 20 Hz, there are great influences on the pressure amplitudes by the relative free gas volumec. Steréometric photographs of the blade in several positions show that for a lower relative free gas volume the cavity starts later than in case of the higher free gas volume. The photographs underline the fact that the inception of the cavitation in the wake field and conse-quently its disappearance, influenced by the free gas volume,
control the pressure amplitudes.
In Fig. 18 two sets of photographs for the observed propeller blade in several positions are shown. The upper row is valid for the speed of revolution n = 30 Hz, the lower for n = 15 Hz. The reason for the great difference in inception and extent of the ca-vitation is the fact that for the higher revolution the absolute pressure is lower (sometimes below zero) than for n = 15 Hz; and the absolute pressure is responsible for the expansion of the free gas bubbles. A more detailed explanation of this physical behaviour
shall be given in the last chapter of this paper.
Another interesting result of these investigations on the influence of the free gas content shall be mentioned briefly, though the corresponding photographs cannot be shown here because of shor-tage of time: The cavitation sheet on the propeller blades became
-29-more and -29-more stable, when the gas content was increased from lower to higher values; i.e. the intermitterd cavitation observed
here is a sheer model effect.
Before finishing this chapter, it has to be mentioned that the model speed of revolution of S.S. "Sydney Express" regarding the Froude law of similarity was n 9.7 Hz. According to Fig. 17 this influence of the free gas volume at this revolution would be extra-ordinary. This speed could not be used because of the too low
tunnel pressure which is necessary for equal cavitatìon numbers of model and full scale. It is obviou that thé influence of the free gas volume is compensated to a certain extent by the greater
revolutions, often used for cavitation tests.
The main results of the described measurements are as follows: Increasing relative free gas volume for cavitation tests in a
wake field causes earlier inception and stronger extension of
the cavity and therefore increasing nondimensional pressure amplitudes.
Cavitation tests for estimating the propeller-excited pressure
amplitudes should include the simultaneous determination of the relative free gas content and later on its possible control. The last statement involves the question of the correct relative
free gas volume in cavitation tests. The answer of this question is of highest importance for all cavitation facilities, especially those with a free surface. Moreover the main results confirm that
the free gas volume scaling the cavity is of the same importance
In connection with the free gas volume it is to be mentioned here that a research project of the Special Research Pool at Hamburg in cooperation with the HSVA, The Technical University of Munich and D n V is going on. Besides cavitation observation and pressure fluctuation measurements the free air content of the
seawater shall be measured as the maintask in this project.
5. Theoretical Research on Cavitation Ince2tion with A2lication
of Bubble Dynamics.
In Fig. 17 it could be observed that for the higher revolutions n = 30 Hz and additionally in all cases of the HSVA-propeller 1283
in homogeneous flow no dependence of the pressure amplitudes K1, on the relative free gas volume c could be stated. On the other hand for the lower revolutions (n = 15 Hz and n = 20 Hz) not only
the pressure amplitudes on the plate but also the observed cavi-tation were dependent on the relative free gas volume oc. to a high
extent. Trying to find an explanation for this dependence one has
to remind that, applying the value oc, the behaviour of the single
bubbles in a flow field with pressure gradient is neglected. Thus it was attempted to explain the differences in cavitation extent and pressure amplitudes for equal propeller loading and equal cavitation number, but different revolutions (e.g. Fig. 17) by means of a theoretical analysis of the dynamic expansion of single bubbles in a flow with pressure gradients. Such theoretical
in-vestigations were carried out by Lederer (17J for steady hydrofoil
Iterative computations for the pressure distribution in compressible water with gas - content around hydrofoils were carried out accor-ding to the following formula
A r o Q
hr
co-
31-+
I ()+y
J1J(x+y?
2°
-A(x-.x) dr
(5.1) (x.
The notation used can be found in sketch No. 3:
Sfçekch Wo3
The formula (5.1) is derived in a paper by Isay and Roestel [18]. In this connection gas means the content of free air in the water as well as the vapour in the interior of the cavitation bubbles. The slip velocity of these bubbles shall be neglected and a further assumption is that the bubbles are moving along streamlines.
in a temporally changing pressure field is described by a diffe-rential equation of the second order. This is the well known
Rayleigh-Plesset equation
'7f
*R
=
R
(5.2)
In this case R stands for the radius and R for the wall velocity of the bubble. The indes 1 is the designation for water or vapour,
the index 2 for dissolved or undissolved air. The star belongs to the gas phase and is the surface tension.
The growth of different initial radii R0 was calculated by Lederer
(uJ
applying equation (5.2), which was solved with a Runge-Kutta method. The streamlines, along which the bubbles are moving, weresubstituted by straight lines y
= n parallel to the x-axis.
For further understanding of the procedure of Lederer {l7Jthe
following ought to be mentioned:
During an air content measurement f153 Z = 1000 bubbles were measured, flowing through a cross-section F0 with a velocity u0
in a
time tcr Dividing the measured radii (e.g. Fig 16) into rangesj = 1,2 J, if the number of bubbles in a range is equal to Z0,
then the gas volume of the flow is
a
(5.3).
4 ç
veo
zoi (R0)
33
-For the radii range R0 the number
of
bubbles is denoted by(5.4),
COjwhich is referred to unit volume.
V
Using the gas volume ratio =
fl
of theflow,
then one Vw can define(R0)3
=
) -7 1(5.8).
't',
So the number n3 of bubbles per unit volume
of
the flow is>a
j4
(5.6).
Comparing an initial state at a point x = x0 with a state at a
point x lying downstream and applying the conservation-equation, which means that he number of bubbles remains constant, one can
find
(44
i0)
=
(1c
(5.7)
4
If the bubbles of the different bubble ranges contribute uni-formly to the compressibility, equation (5.7) leads to
For a point x (downstream from the point x0) one can determine
J
-- 3
The expansion
of
the radius Rxjof
the single bubble from theinitial radius R0 in the pressure field p(x) is calculated by
means
of
the Rayleigh-Plesset equation (5.2). IfR
= .BCR0,x)
(510)is the solution of equation (5.2), the local gas volume ratio in the hydrofoil flow can be derived from the equations (5.7) and
(5.8) and it follows
J
(x,y)
0(.B(R
, X,
(5.11).A
As already mentioned, the precise determination of the streamline
-is neglected. Instead of this, the straight lines y
= n parallel
to the chord (x-axis) are regarded.
Knowing the pressure distribution p(x, Yn) along the lines y
=
according to equation (5.1) and using a nuclei distribution from a laser scattered light measurement (e.g. Fig. 16), the local gas
volume ratio c&(x, y) of the flow can be calculated with the aid
of equation (5.11).
The computations by Lederer E173 were carried out for two foil
sections, a curved and an uncurved section. For the latter section
35
-results are shown in Fig. 19 to 21. The chordlengths for both were
assumed to be 2 A = 10 cm.
The nuclei distributions of the computation were adapted to the results of the laser scattered light measurementElsj. Since more-over the growth of a single bubble depends on the absolute value
of the initial radius R0, the measure bubble histograms were divided into four ranges:
R01
= 5rn;
R02 =35,rn;
R03 = 651wr; R04 =95,,m.
These ranges were applied in two different nuclei distributions
for the calculations: Nuclei distribution No. 1:
V
= 50;
'o2 = 20; o3 = 5; co4 = 1 with
= Vw
1,3 10
= number of bubbles of the range j)
Nuclei distribution No.2,
= 200;c02 = 20; co3 = 5; o4 = 1 with
K
= 1,3 . 10The increase of the number,çof the small bubbles by a factor four
means practically no change in the free gas volume ratio K0 of the
flow.
The occurrence of diffusion is neglected for this theoretical investigations, since this phenomenon develops too slowly,
com-pared with the pressure changes on the foil section. Futhernìore,
In order to show clearly the influence of the nuclei present in the flow, the expansion of a single bubble in the pressure field is displayed in Fig. 19. There the results of calculations for the 1
smallest bubble R01 and the greatest one R04 are shown. Fig. 19 is valid for the cavitation number
p-p
=0.3
V
(iu
The pressure p0 = i kp/cm2 and Po = 0.2 kp/cm2 in the flow corres-pond nearly to the revolutions n = 30 Hz and n = 15 Hz in the ex-periments from 1974 [15] . The results of the computation, given
in Fig. 19 and plottet against the chordlength 2A, show clearly that the smallest bubble R01 is expanded after a short distance from the leading edge, if the inflow pressure is Po = 1 kp/cm2
The same bubble R01 is not expanded, if the inflow pressure is Po = 0.2 kp/Cm2. The reason for the latter fact is that the
pressure on the foil section does not reach stronger negative values because of the lower inflow velocity for the constant cavitation number = 0.3. This can be found in Fig. 20, if the pressure distributions for the two inflow pressures p0 1 kp/cm2
and Po = 0.2 kp/cm2 are compared in the region 0.01
2A
0.06.The strongly negative pressures therefore lead to the expansion of small bubbles. On the other hand a difficult problem of
substant-ial importance appears, if the question should be answered.1 to what
values the pressure in real water with free gas content may drop.
J- ')P
37
-Nevertheless Keller (see p. 96 in 116]) found that during cavitation inception the absolut pressure on a body in the flow decreased
to negative values, whose magnitude depended on the nuclei
distri-bution, i.e. the pretreatment of the water.
From Figs. 19 and 20 it becomes understandable, why the cavity
extent in Fig. 18 for n = 30 Hz is greater than for n = 15 Hz: The first reason is that the absolute pressure at the foil section for
n 30 Hz reaches stronger negative values than for n = 15 Hz,
and the second reason is that the number of small bubbles (see Fig. 16) is always greater than that of the great bubbles.
Additionally the great bubbles are further displaced from the foil
section (screening effect).
The number of bubbles has in influence of the local free gas
volume r&(x, n) (see eq. 5.11). In this connection the results calculated by Lederer (17] for the local free gas volume c&(x,
on the suction side at a distance y/A = 0.005 are given in Fig. 21.
Here the nuclei distribution No. 2 for Po = i kp/cm2 attains the
greatest value c(x,
n'
since the number of small bubbles R01 is four times as great as in the distribution No. 1. By the way, in this theorie with spherical symmetry for the bubble, the value *= i means pure cavitation. This theory of the behaviour of single bubbles becomes meaningless, when the single bubbles grown and touch each other. In this relation of exspanding single bubblesa question concerning Fig. 17 emerges. There the nondimensional pressure amplitude Kp5 on the flat plate is plotted against the relative free gas volume .But the que'stion is, whether the value
'& is the right parameter for plotting the results, because,using
is ignored. But a better presentation of the results like Fig. 17 needs the measurement of smaller bubbles as measured in Fig. 16.
In this respect the recommendation given by the
ITTC-Cavitation-ç t Ô
Committee' measure the bubble radii between iO,&m and 250,um should
be supplemented: Nuclei should additionally be measured between 5 and 1O»m radius.
At the end of this chapter on cavitation inception and bubble dynamics questions on future work should be discussed.
Normally the cavitation number and the thrust - or torque coefficient of model and prototype are kept equal for cavitation tests. This does not always lead to geometrically similar extent of cavitation (see Fig. 18), since the number and size of nuclei are important parameters in the reaction to the pressure field of the foil. Thus geosim tests with hydrofoils or propellers should be performed with simultaneous measurement and possibly control of the free air content.
of the
Supplementary investigations'theory of bubble dynamics described above should accompany the geosim tests. Furthermore for additional similarity conditions of cavitation tests it is necessary to know
the nuclei distribution in seawater around a ship. Other important factors are the basic behaviour of the cavitation facilities and the effect of installed flow regulators upon the free air content. These amount to a stronger consideration of the quality of the flow
medium for cavitation tests.
Efforts regarding these three tasks in cavitation research, namely geosim test for cavitating hydrofoils or propellers,
39
-tunnels and
determination of free air content in seawater
are being pursued in Hamburg at the Hamburg model tank (HSVA) and the Institute for shipbuilding (IfS) within the special research
pool for shipbuilding (SF3 98).
Conclusions.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the results presented
Reardin chapter 2:
The hull surface forces excited on fast naval vessels by a cavitating tip vortex can be decreased by shifting the maximum circulation
to inner radii of the propeller. This method is probably useless for tankers and container ships, because of their wake distribution. In the theoretical field the estimation of the variation of the cavitating tip vortex in a ships's wake would be an interesting task. Afterwards it would be possible to account for the cavitating tip vortex in the total vibration excitation by thepropeller.
Regarding chapter 3:
Not only the technique for measuring the instationary pressure
distribution on propeller blades in a ship 's wake but also the three-dimensional lifting surface theory for the same purpose must be
improved. For the measuring technique the so-called direct method should be applied, i.e. pressure pick-ups mounted in the surface
Reardin chapter 4
The influence of the free air or gas content on cavitation in-ception makes it necessary to determine the nuclei distribution during cavitation tests, where simultaneously propeller-excited pressure amplitudes are to be measured. The possible control of the free air content would balueable tool for these tests.
Regarding chapter 5
From the theoretical investigations on bubbie dynamics it can be
concluded that the theoretical model of the bubble and its
behaviour in pressure fields' should be checked by means of gebsim
tests. Another problem would be scale effects on cavitation, which should be pursued with a combination of experiment and theory.
7. References
.
iJ
Laudan, J.: Propellerkräfte und -imente beim
geradlinigen Stoppmanöver.
(Propeller forces and moments during a
straight-lined crash stop). HSVA-Bericht F 14/7k für den
SFB 98.
12]
van Larnrneren, W.P.A., van Manen, J.D.,
Osterveld, M.W.C.: The Wageningen B-Screw Series.
Transactions SNAME Vol. 77 (1969)
3]
Laudan, J.: Einfluß der Kavitation auf die
Propel-lerkräfte und -momente beim geradlinigen
Stopp-manöver.
(The influence of the cavitation on the propeller
forces and torque during a straight-lined crash
stop). HSVA-Bericht Nr. F 8/76.
Laudan, J.: Einfluß der Schräganströmung auf die
Propellerkräfte und -momente bei verschiedenen
Fahrt steigungswinkeln.
(The influence of the oblique flow on propeller
forces and torque for different advance angles.)
(Wake measurements with a series 60 model.)
Institut fUr Schiffbau, Bericht Nr. 34O (1976).
163
Weitendorf, E. -A.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen
der durch kavitierende Propeller erzeugten
Druck-schwankungen.
(Experimental investigations on the pressure
fluctuations caused by cavitating propellers.)
Schiff und Hafen, Heft 11 (1973), 25. Bd.,
s. ioo-iO6o.
Ackeret, J.: Über stationäre Hohiwirbel.
(On stationary hollow vortices..)
Ing.-Archiv (1930), S. 399-4O2.
L8i
Weitendorf, E.-A.: Kavitationseinflüsse auf die
vom Propeller induzierten Druckschwankungeri.
(Cavitation influences on the propeller induced
fluctuations.)
Institut für Schiffbau der Universität Hamburg,
Bericht Nr. 338 (Sept. 1976).
i 9
Chljupin, A.I.; Weitendorf, E.-A.: Berechnungen von
Druckamplituden mittel8 einer verbesserten
Quellen-Senken-Verteilung für einen kavitierenden
Spitzen-wirbel mit Knoten und Vergleich mit Messungen.
(Calculations of pressure amplitudes by means of
an improved source-sink distribution for a
cavita-ting tip vortex with nodes, and comparison with
measurements. )
Institut für Schiffbau der Universität Hamburg,
Bericht Nr.
339
(August1976.)
10]
Kienappel, K.; Triebstein, H. und Wagener, J.:
Messung der instationären Druckverteilung und der
Kräfte an einem Propeller im Schiffsnachstrom.
(Measurements of the instationary pressure
distri-bution and forces on a propeller in a ship's wake.)
Internai
DFVLR-AVA Report No. IB
253-76 C 0
(March
1976).
[iJ
Kienappel, K.: Wiederholungsmessung der
instatio-nären Druckverteilung eines Propellers im
Schiffs-nachstrom.
(Repeated measurement of the instationary pressure
distribution on a propeller in a ship's wake.)
DFVLR-AVA Report No. IB
253-76
J 09 (Sept.
1976).
im Schiffsnachstrom.
(On the calculation of the pressure distribution
arid the forces on propellers in a ship's wake.)
Rep. No
309
Institut für Schiffbau der Universität
Hamburg (Oktober
1974).
Isay, W-H.: Moderne Probleme der Propellertheorie.
(Modern problems ori propeller theory.)
Berlin - Heidelberg - New York, Springer-Verlag
(1970).
1114f
van Oossanen, P., and van der Kooy, J.: Vibratory
hull forces induced by cavitating propellers.
The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Spring
Meeting
(1972).
115;
Keller, A.?., and Weiteridorf, E.-A.: Der Einfluß
des ungelösten Gasgehaltes auf die
Kavitations-erscheinungen an einem Propeller und auf die von
ihm erregten Druckschwankungen.
(Influence of undissolved air content on cavitation
phenomena at the propeller blades and ori induced
hull pressure amplitudes.)
Rep. No 321 A Institut für Schiffbau der
Universi-tät Hamburg (Sept.
1975).
116]
Keller, A.?.: Experimentelle und theoretische
Untersuchungen zum Problem der modellmäßigen
Behandlung von Strörnungskavitatlon.
(Experimental and theoretical investigations on
the problem of cavitation in a flow with models.)
Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau der T.U. München,
Bericht
26 (1973).
f17j
Lederer, L.: Profilströmungen unter
Berücksichti-gung der Dynamik von Kavitationsblasen.
(Hydrofoil flow with regard to bubble dynamics.)
Rep. No
31
Institut für Schiffbau der Universität
Hamburg (Oktober 1976).
f18j
Isay, W.-H., and Roestel, Th.: Berechnungen der
Druckverteilung an Flügelprofilen in gashaltiger
Wasserströmung.
(Calculations of pressure distributions on
hydro-foils in water flow with gas content.)
Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
54 (19714).
Fig.
Caption
No
i
Test setup for pressure amplitudes and
coordi-nates for measurements
Noridimensional blade frequency pressure
amplitu-des K3 in x-direction for two propellers in
homogeneous flow
3
Cavitating propellers in homogeneous flow
Optimal propeller
1283
in homogeneous flow
under different cavitation
conditions
5
Different shapes of the cross-section of
cavi-tating tip-vortices used for calculations
6
Calculated pressure amplitudes
and K6 with
variations of the
wavelength c
7
Calculated and measured pressure-amplitudes
(including those owing to a cavitating tip vortex)
on a flat plate
8
Measured instationary pressureon the
propeller-blades in a ship's wake
9
Measured instationary pressures ori the
propeller-blades in a ship's wake
r
Fig.
No
Caption
10
Measured instationary pressures on the
propeller-blades in a ship's wake
il
Comparison between measured and calculated
pressures on propeller blades
12
Comparison between measured and calculated
pressures distribution on propeller blades
13
Comparison between calculated pressure and
cavity extent at radius riRa
p.90
114
Nondimensional blade frequency pressure
amplitudes K,5 in axial wake without cavitation
15
Test setup for laser light scattering method
16Nucleus size histogram and fraction of relative
free gas volume
17
Nondimensional blade frequency pressure
amplitu-des K5 in an axial wake dependent on measured
relative free gas volume
18
HSVA propeller
1917
in a wacè for two propeller
revolutions with low free gas volume
19
Calculated (in
117] )
growth of a single bubble
on a hydrofoil in stationary
flow21
Calculated (in
¡17J )
local relative free gas
volume
on a hydrofoil in stationary flow
Sketch No. 1:
Wave-like hollow vortex
Sketch No. 2;
Ellipsoidal hollow vortex
Sketch No.
3:
Notation for hydrofoil in
B5
BL,
Direction of
flow
e 30mm
B2
Fig.1: Test setup
for pressure amplitudes
0.12 0.08 0.04 s
¡p
o in front of Prop. Prop.-plane b,\
aIR
0.109aIR: 0.109
in front of prop. Prop. plane
-0.5 -0.25 0 0.25 0.5
x/R-Fig.2: Non dimensional blade frequency
pressure
amplitudes Kp3
ifl
x-direction for two propellers in
homogeneous flow
-.05
-0.25 à 0.250.5 .a-x/R
Pos. 1 2 3 4
Propelter 1240; N:3 Advance - Ratio J :0.803
Max. Circulation drawn to inner radii
ATM
PropeLler 1283 N 3 3.00
Advarce - Ratio J: 0.803 2.00
Circulation distribution OptimaL
.eVA_ 1.75
VA 1.50= 1.25
Lib
Pos. 2 3 /4 5 0.06 0.01. 0.02 oFig.3: Cavitating propellers in
homogeneous flow
P 1283, N3
P 121.0N=3
Optimal distri bution
Maximal circulation
of circulation
drawn to inner radii
OJ4
1,50
dVA.-2JOO
a'VA_1,2
'VA175
OVA 1,14
Tipclearctnce a/R0.109
Advance Ratio J
0.72
Wave(ength X0
600
Fig. 5: Different shapes of the cross
-section of cavitating tip vortices
used for caLculatioñs
0°
20°
/400
60°
800 ¡ i i I 1000 i i120°
iX
m24
m2/4
XA
XA2O° x0°
z2Q
m8
photograph
20
X
X0
from
No
XAO° XLp°°
00 I I I I I20°
40°
60°
80°
t I I1000
I I120°
1/.0°
0.1 o 0.2 o. i o 0.2 0.1 O 0.2 0.1 O 0.2 0.1 O
flgg
g
g
3. 6. 9.n front of prop.
HSVA -Prop. 1283; N 3Homogeneous flow
Advance Ratio
J 0.72Tip clearence al ROEZ 0.109
Measurement
g
e
e
3. 6. 9. 3. 6. 9. Prop. plane ge
g ee
n
ne
e
Calculations with
1.14 Hn
g 3. 6. harm Orderbehind prop.
Fig. 7:
CalcuLated and measured
pressure amplitudes (in
-cluding those owing to a
cavitating tip vortex)on a flat plate
VAo
XA
)(
RKam/Ra
266°
10° 141°0010
1.7570°
15°31°
0.014
1.5075°
15° 143°0.017
1.25102°
20°41°
0.018
1.14110°
20°
46°
0.018
Pos.
Pl
P2
P3
P4
P5
ge
e
ge
e
n
3. 6 9.e
4-,2.0
1.75 1.50 1.25o
o-cp
0.16 CN 0.123
0.08 0.04 a) o L)I0
-0.04
-0.08
-0.12
-0.16
00 30° 90°
180°270°
330°
o
o
.
AAVA- Propeller
noridimens Rad. r /R
0.50
pressure side
suction side
,po90°Fig.8: Measured instationary
pressures
on
the propeller-blades in
a ships
wake
0 01 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 c ho rd length
pressure side
suction side
00 30090°
180°
270°
330°
D Os
A 90° 00w
0 0.10.2
0.3
0./.0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
chordlength
Fig. 9: Measured instationary
pressures
on the
propeller blades in
a
ship
o a. Q-a) (N ç'J
3
o-a. ocp
0.08 0.0 L O-0.04
o-0.08
-0.16-0.20
pressure side
suction side
I
AVA -Propeller
nondimens. Rad. r/R
:0.975
Fig. 10:
Measured instationary
pressures on
the propeller
blades in a ship's wake
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
08
o 9chordlength
-0.24
00 300 900
180°2700 330°
900.0/4 o
-0.04
-0.08
-0.12
-0.16
-0.20
-0.24
-0.28
Fig.11: Comparison between
measured
und calculated pressure
distri-bution on propeller blades
A
-
7-/
/
00I
r
----o----measured
pelter
caLculated
AVA-Pro
P Pr' W2 R
0.12 0.08 0.60 6
0.8-
chordlength
0 0.1 0.2pressure
coefficer'it
-p-p0
Cp_
pw2R2
012
0.08
0.04
O-0.04
-0.08
-0.12
-0.16
-0.20
-0.24
-0.28
0
0.2
0h
0.6
0.8
1.0
chord (ength
Fig.12: Compansion
between measured
and cacuEated pressures on
propeller blades
Inondimens.Rcid.
i InR =0.90
£
t.
Blade pos. Lp0330°
Jmeasured
caLculated
--A--AVA-Propeller
I I J0.10
0.08
-0.06 0.04 0.02 O-GO
2--0.04
-0.06
-0.08
-0.10--0.12
pressure side
suction side
cavity
t e n gi hcalculated pressure
-A av i ty press ure a cc o rd ngs
0.211Model -Prop.
HSVA 1917
(Zeise-Design
Fig. 13:
Compurision between calcuLated
pressure and cavity extent at
radius r/RaO.9O
caLculated pressure
p0330°
rd i n g 0.211;re
ccc o =cavity length
100./o
__!_ 0.102
0./. 0.608
chord length
0.06 0.04 0.02-O - 0.0 2-0.04
-0.06
-0.08
-0.10
K5
0.012 0.0 08 0.0040.002
O-0.48
-0.24
HSVAFrcp. 1917
Advance Ratio j
Kl
0.61 Tipclearance a/R
0.60
Measurement
Theory
Fig.14: NondimensionaE blade frequency
pressure
amplitude K5 in
axial wake without
cavitation
x ,flow
0 0.24 0.48'direction
Ra
7
deviation
of measurement
Contr1 volume
Test section
Slit aperture
/
t
PhotornultipLier
Fig.15: Test set up for laser light
scattering method
0.1 0.001
20
Test No l5
Degassed Water
Rel. Free Gas Volume
loo
Q'-O.11&-1U
Diameter of nucleus D C,Lm2
0.0 01
3L O
Fig.16: Nucleus size histogram
and fraction of relative
free gas volume
1
L____..1
Nuclei per cm3
Relative free gas volume
n-1
L..
ir-1 r
-
r
i I i i I LO C) 0.1 0.01 200 3000.04
0.03
0.02
0.01 -O ¶20 Hz
K5:
pn2D2
C Uy,fl: 15Hz
Advance ratio
J Kl
0.61
Cavitation number d
:0. 211Pressure pick up pos. 3, directly ab. prop.
HSVA -Prop. 1917, number of blades N: 5
usual cavitation test
-0.01 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1
Rel. free gas volume oC
---O n
«
15 Hzn
20Hz
: 30 Hz
Fig.17: Nondimensional blade frequency
pressure amplitudes Kp5 Ifl Qn
axial wake dependent on
mea-sured relative free
gas volume
n
.30 Hz
0.12 10 n15Hz
= 0.25 -KT 0.616'
=0.211Fig.18: HSVA Propeller 1917 in
a wake for two
propeller revolutions with low
free gas
Y,4
0.005
-9U2
4----3 i o2 3 2lo
6i kp
Posmaflest bubble R01
Po :1
kp/cm2
0.3smallest bubbte R
greatest
bubble R04
r _t\ P''
.U.h
cm 0.004 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.1 0.2chordlengih 24
Fig. 19: Calcu [ci ted(in [17]) growth of
ci
p
[kpicm2]
04
0.2 o - 0. 2-0.4
-0.6
Fig. 20: CcUculated(in[171)pressure
distribution on a hydrofoil
in stationary flow
n u c 1. d i st r. No 2 p1 kp/cm2
nuci . d istr. No. I
kp/cm2
/
Jnuclei.distrib.
1nuclei.distrib.
Ip0-0.
2kp
cm2 po0.2
No 1 and No 2--.
-/
/<Po
-7--/
/
/
lkp/cm2
-Vp2
P0 - Pv2°
distance from
suction side
I J I Y/A 0. 005 I I 001 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0chord(ength 2A
o_2 distr.No 1
p z i
kp/cm2
p0zO.2
Çnuclei distr.
Lnuclei disir.
kp/cm2
INo 1 and
No 2,I liii
Ip0 - P;
-0.3 IIII
T
U0distance from
suction side
Y/A z 0.005
I I ü. 01002
0.0/. 0 1 0.2 0./. 1.0chordlength 2A
Fig. 21: CaLculated (in[17])loccil
relative
free
gas volume o( on a hydrofoil
r
2RK
xo
X0
Xo
x
2(RKRKam)
Sketch No2 :
Ellipsoidal hollow vortex
T
U,X
2y(x
Shock
y
X