tV. 992
ARCHIEF
SYMPOSIUM ON
"HYDRODYNAMICS OF SHIP AND OFFSHORE PROPULSION SYSTEMS" HØVIK OUTSIDE OSLO, MARCH 20. - 25., 1977
"INVESTIGATION ON THE DUCTED PROPELLER CAVITATION AND THE DUCT EROSION
PRE-VENTION BY THE AIR INJECTION SYSTEM" By
H. Narita and Y. Kunitake, Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding Co., Tokyo K. Holden and B. Mugaas,
Det norske Ventas, Oslo
SPONSOR: DET NORSKE VERITAS
PAPER 11/3 SESSION 3
Lab.
y. Scheepsbouwkun
Technische Hogeschool
CONTENTS:
ibIohk
d Rfde!p P a g e: LN b INTRODUCTION PROPELLER CAVITATION OBSERVATIONS 32.1. Type and Extent of Cavitation 5
2.2. Cavitation Thickness
Distribution 7
HULL PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS,
PROPELLER SHAFT FORCES AND
STRUCTURAL VIBRATIONS 8
3.1 Test Equipment and Instrumentation 8
3.2 Results and Discussions 8
NOISE li
4.1 Test Equipment and Instrumentation 11
4.2 Results and Discussions 12
THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS 15 CONCLUDING REMARKS 18 AC KNOWLEDGEMENT 19 REFERENCES 21 N' e 'J DOCUMENTA TE J DATUM, I
1. INTRODUCTION
The increasinc size of tankers has required increased propeller loading, and in the last few years the attention is drawn to the use of ducted propeller and its advantages. The
results of such installations have shown that properly designed ducted propellers can
pro-vide a speed increase as compared with
con-ventional propellers /1/, /2/.
However, voyage experiences have also revealed that the duct surface along the propeller tip was susceptible to cavitation erosion,
especi-ally ir the upper part. This problem is one of the most important technical problems to be
solved for successful pplication of larqe
duct-ed propellers.
-1-"Investigation on the Ducted Propeller Cavitation and the Duct Erosion Pre
-2-In order to establish a method to prevent duct erosion,
both theoretical research and model experiments were
conduc-ted in above approaches on the 280,000 dwt motor tanker M/T
"THORSAGA" fitted with a ducted propeller. Through this
re-search the air injection system, which provides air in water
flowing close to the duct surface suceptible to erosion,
appeared to be most promising among the various hydrodynamic
measures investigated and therefore was, installed on M/T
"THOR-SAGA".
For the purpose of confirming the effect of air injection
system the authors conducted the full-scale experiments in
1974 and 1975. Observations of fullscale ducted propeller
cavitation without air injection had already been conducted
by authors in 1973 /1/ /3/ /4/, and other observations have
also been reported /5/ /6/. However, in the present fuliscale
experiments observations of ducted propeller cavitation were
conducted for various amounts of air injected using
cameras, a high speed movie cartiera as well as conventional
TV-camera in order to understand the phenomena clearly.
Further, in order to understand indirectly the effect of air
on the cavitation, erosion reduction noise measurements
near the stern were conducted, and the effect of air
injec-tion on the hull surface pressure and hull vibrainjec-tion levels
were also investigated.
In this paper the results of these fullscale investigations
are presented including cavity thickness contours on the
propeller blades obtained by analysing the stereo photos,
and the effect of air injection is discussed from various
-3
For future design reference theoretical calculations of
the extent of cavitation on the ducted propeller blades were
carried out. Results are compared with fuliscale observations.
Principal characteristics of M/T "THORSAGA" are:
-Deadweight 279,810 tons
Main engine:
Mitsui B&W 9K98FF diesel engine
Output & RPM 34,200 HP x 103
Ducted propeller
Propeller diameter 7.3 m
Number of propeller blades 5 Duct inside diameter 7.4 m
Duct length 3.7 m
2. PROPELLER CAVITATION OBSERVATIONS
Tests were made for 3 different drafts at 85,95 and 105 RPM
with air flow rate varying from O to 15 m3/min. Air was
injected in axial direction along the duct inner plate from two outlets positioned at 00 and 15°.
Hull dimensions
Length BP
Breadth Depth
Draft fully loaded
1080' 170' 91' 71' 0" 0" 0" 5 - 3/4"
Conditions' dF/dA
Ballast I 36'/44'
4, Full load
Ballast II 42'/50'
71 '/71'
RPM Vs SEP Air volume Sea state J 85 o 5 10 95 105 105 85 105 4 15.9 30.700
-O 5 O O 5iO
14.2 30.500 J 5 105-6
O 3 51-2
10 151-2
Observations of propeller cavitation were made applying TV-camera,
stereo photo technique and high speed movie camera.
The TV-camera was used to observe the general transition of
pro-peller cavitation. The high speed movie pictures were taken at
12 18.000
14.3 23.200
-5-limited occasions to observe closely the dynamic behavior of
propeller cavitation and motion of cavities being ejected from
propeller and hitting the duct. The stereo photos were taken
with intent of estimating cavity thickness on propeller
blades.
2.1 Type and Extent of Cavitation.
For the ballast condition I a large amount of entrained
air-bubbles partly prevented propeller cavitaion observations.
From the television recordings, however, a few pictures of
reasonable quality were obtained for some blade angular
positions. Fig. 2.1 shows sketches from television recordings
for blade augular positions where the viewing conditions were
satisfactory.
For the same RPM and volume of injected air, time variations
of the extent of propeller cavitation were significant. Due to
lack of TV-recordings from some angular positions and the
large time variations of extent of blade cavities, no special
tendency regarding influence of air on propeller cavitation is
found as it is within the range observed without air
injec-tion.
For the ballast condition II, the sketches from the te'evision
recordings are given in Fig. 2.2. Photos of propeller blade
cavitation for various angular positions are presented in Fig.
-6-The varialions of extent of propeller cavitation with injected
amount of air up to 10 m3/min. are small and within time
variations.
For 10 and 15 m3/min. some increase of extent of blade
cavitation was observed. However, the difference may be due
to a delay of the collapsing process of blade cavities. The
rate of collapse of cavities is very high (withdrawal of sheet
towards tip). This process is clearly illustrated on the high
speed movies and may also be seen from the sketches of the
television recordings as well as from the photos. Between the
blade angular positions (referred to the propeller generator
line) 300 and 500 nearly all the developed blade cavities
collapse in the region on the duct where plate damages occurred.
Fig. 2.8 illustrates tip vortex cavitation. RPM of initiation
of tip vortex cavitation is within the 50 - 55 range.
For load condition the same conclusions with respect to
variations of extent of cavities with amount of injected air
may be drawn - Fig. 2.9 - 2.10.
The injected air was observed to mix partly with the cavities
in the blade tip region. Some mixture of air and cavities may
have been obtained before the main part of cavities collapses.
At least a visible thickening of the tip vortex has occured
indicating that the injected air has been sucked into the
It can also be observed that some of the injected air moves
with the sheet/clouds of cavities in the tip region filling
the gap between the tip and the duct inner plate. Further, the
injected air seems to form a layer protecting some parts of
the most exposed area on the duct inner plate.
However, the sheet of cavities on inner parts of the blade is
not mixed with air.
2.2 Cavitation Thickness Distribution.
Stereophoto observations were carried out to find cavitation
thickness distributions. The stereo analyses have been
per-formed by the Institute for Geodesy and Photograrnmetry,
University of Trondheim.
Coordinates of cavity surface are given in cm. and refered
to blade surface. Behind the trailing edge of the blade
thickness of cavities are found extrapolating the reference
blade surface. For one blade angular position, shape of
cavity surface along various blade radial sections are given
(in cm.). Fig. 2.11 - 2.14.
For conditions where there is a volume of injected air,
distances between iso-curves are quite small around the air
outlets. In those areas large inaccuracies may exist because
coordinates of points on the surface of the injected air
have been difficult to define because of a rough and pulsating
3. HULL PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS, PROPELLER SHAFT FORCES AND STRUCTURAL VIBRATIONS.
3.1 Test Equipment and Instrumentation.
In order to measure the effect of air injection on hull
surface forces pressure tranceducers were fitted on both
port and starboard of the stern hull. Propeller thrust
varia-tions were measured by strain gauges fitted on the propeller
shaft, and superstructure and local vibrations were measured
by velocity transducers.
In the following, the particulars of test instrumentation are
described. Fig. 3.1 shows coupling diagram and positions of
velocity and pressure tranceducers are shown in Fig. 3.2.
Pressure transducers: ENDEVECO
Max range 100 psi
L-
15 psiNatural frequency 6 kHz
Diametre of membrane 6 min
Velocity transducer: CEC
Linear range 3 - 700 Hz
3.2 Results and Discussions.
a) Ballast Condition I
RPM = 105, V = 17.4 kts, SHP = 32000, Fig. 3.3.
Pressure irnulses on the hull
Blade frequency amplitude increases for amounts of
Above 5 m3/min. the amplitudes were fairly constant.
A reduction of amplitudes of higher frequencies was found
showing a minimum for an air flow rate equal to 3 m3/min.
Shaft excitation forces - dynamic thrust.
Amplitudes of twice blade frequency showed a large
reduc-tion with increasing air flow rate.
Local and superstructure vibration.
Vertical vibrations of bladefrequency measured by
vel-city transducers No. 3 and 4 increase with the air flow rate. The influence on amplitudes of higher frequencies
is negligible.
Superstructure vibrations measured by transducer No. 2, 6
and i increase for amplitudes of all frequencies up to an
3.
air flow rate equal to 5 m ¡min. then the level is
decreasing. For an injected amount of air equal to 10
m3/rnn. vibration amplitude for transducer No. 2 is
below the value with no air.
The reduction of the superstructure vibration level above
5 m3/min. may be due to a corresponding decrease of the dynamic thrust amplitudes as the hull pressure impulses
3.
10
-Ballast Condition II
RPM = 105, vs = 15.9 kts., SHP = 30700, Fig. 3.4.
Pressure impulses on the hull
For airflow rates between O-3 1n3/min. amplitudes of all
frequencies are fairly constant.
The increase of the amplitudes occurs when injecting an
amount of air equal to 5 m3/min. Above that value a
reduction of amplitudes' of higher frequencies is found.
Amplitudes of lower frequences are not influenced in the
air flow rate region 5-15 m3/min.
Shaft excitation forces - dynamic thrust
The influence of air injection on dynamic thrust
ampli-tudes is small for all air flow rates.
Local and Superstructure vibrations
Both the local and superstructure vibration level of
1 x blade and 2 x blade frequency increase
correspond-ing to the increase of induced pressure impulses on
the hull.
Load Condition
RPM = 105, V = 14.2 kts., SHP = 30500, Fig. 3.5.
Pressure imu1ses on the hull
Amplitudes of frequencies below the 4 x blade frequency
in-fluence on amplitudes of higher frequencies.
Shaft excitation forces - dynamic thrust
From 0-5 m3/min. air injected amplitudes of i x blade and 2x blade frequency increase.
Local and su2erstructure vibrations
Local and superstructure vibrations increase for all
frequencies with air flow rate. Only small differences
on the phase angle relationships are found with respect
to injected amount of air.
4. NOISE
4.1 Test Equipment and Instrumentation.
Airborne noise was measured with the following
instruxnen-for calibration tation:
Precision Sound Level meter Brüel & Kjr type 2203
Octave band filter set " " 1613
Microphone " " 4145
Random Incidence Corredor Brüel & Kjr UA 0055
Microphone AKG 1/2" " 451E
Sound and vibration meter Nortronic A/S tI 815
12
-Noise in tfte water was measured with:
Brüel & Kjar Hydrophone type 8100
Charge amplifier " 2633
Narrow band analyses of the hydrophone signals were performed
with the Nortronic Analyzer. Hydrophone signals were also
recorded on a Tandberg Instrumentation tape recorder, Model
115.
4.2 Results and Discussions
Octave band sound measurements were made in some positions
in aft peak tank and engine room. The positions were chosen
because cavitation noise could easily be distinguished and/or
dominated over other noise. In addition to the octave band
analysis, narrow band analyses (5% bandwidth) were made of
signals from a microphone placed in the lower aft .peak tank.
In addition noise was measured in the water outside the
hull, by means of a hydrophone mounted on the port side
just above the observation tubes, close to a pressure
transducer
-Typical results of the octave band analyses are given for
a specified condition in Fig. 4.1. The levels in each
octave band are presented with the air flow as variable
parameter. These diagrams show the noise reduction as a
function of air flow rates, for given frequency bands.
A similar presentation has been chosen for the narrow-band
13
-Fig. 4.3. presents the difference between noise spectra for
two air flow rates by hydrophone measurements for each
condition.
In ballast condition I at 105 RPM, level reduction of high
frequency components was found in the upper aft peak tank.
The damping is significant at small air flow rates. The
tendency towards high frequency damping was found also in
the engine workshop.
Also hydrophone measurements show that low frequency
components are -quite variable, whereas fairly consistent
decrease in levels in shown by components higher than about
150 Hz, as shown in Fig. 4.3.
By octave band analyses in ballast condition II, some level
reduction at high frequencies was found in all measuring
positions. In addition, some increase of the level in band
1 (31.5 Hz) was found in the engine workshop and in the
upper aft peak tank. Level reduction seems to occur for
fre-quencies higher than about 1000 Hz (band 6).
In load condition at 105 RPM, the most pronounced changes
in noise levels occur just when the air flow is turned on.
When the flow is increased beyond 5 m3/min, the high-frequency
noise levels decrease further, but on the whole, less
notice-ably than when the air flow was just turned on. Low frequency
14
-For the microphone signal, the tendency is towards sonie
high-frequency level reduction and some low-high-frequency increase.
The hydrophone measurements confirm this result, with rather
clear low frequency increase and high-frequency level
re-duction. Small air flow rates seem sufficient to provided
good reduction as shown in Fig. 4.4.
The general conclusion of the investigation is that injection
of air into the duct tends to reduce high-frequency noise
levels and increase the levels of low-frequency components.
The hydrophone measurements of noise in the water confirm
the results found by microphone measurements of airborn noise inside the ship.
The injection of air may cause the cavitation bubbles to be
"cushioned" and produce a lesser implosion impact on the
duct. Also it will cause the tip vortices from the blades to
contain more air and may then dampen the sound when they
strike the structure. Both of these effects will tend to
dampen high-frequency noise components.
The level increase of low frequency components does not
cause a noise problem, except in cases of very high levels,
the ear being relatively insensitive to low-frequency sound.
However, increasd low-frequency noise level indicates an
overall increase of vibrations, which may be noticed in the
15
-5. THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS
The hydrodynamic force on the propeller and duct, and the
extent of propeller blade cavitation at various angular
blade positions have been calculated applying the following
procedure: At defined angular intervals, the strength and
radial distribution of propeller bound circulation are
calcu-lated. When this is done for one complete propeller revolution,
the wake in way of the duct is corrected for the effect of
propeller's bound and free circulation. The duct's bound
circulation is calculated and corrected for downwash due to
the free vorticies of the duct, and the wake in way of the
propeller disc is corrected due to the duct's bound
circula-tion. The procedure is repeated in an iterative manner until satisfactory convergence is obtained on the average propeller
thrust. The forces and moments corresponding to the resulting circulation are then obtained.
Since the numerical approach consists of calculating
pro-perties at defined circumferential stations around the duct,
these stations may well have different geometrical shapes,
i.e. the method is also suitable for analyses of
non-axis-symmetric duct shapes.
Having revealed the propeller blade sectional loadings at
defined angular stations, the detailed pressure distribu-tion on each blade secdistribu-tion is found by linear theory
super-imposing effects from profile camber, thickness and angle of
16
-From the detailed pressure distribution at each blade sec-tion the extent of cavitasec-tion is found applying the
prin-ciple of no thrust reduction at each section.
The results from the analyses are given in Table 5.1 and
Figs. 5.1 - 5.2.
The analyses are carried dut for 3 conditions:
Ballast Condition:
RPM = 85
RPM = 105 and
Load Condition RPM = 105
The only comparison possible with neasured values are the
comparisons between calculated and measured SHP. Taking
into consideration the tolerances on the measurements and
scale effect on the model wake used in the calculation, the
values are comparing reasonably well.
TABLE 5.1
Duct and proller thrust in tons.
Condition Duct Thrust Prop.Thrust Calculated Measured
Ballast SHP SlIP Cond. 1 38 158 19 500 18 000 = 85 RPM Ballast Cond.l 62 213 33 400 32 000
=105
RPM Load Cond. =105 RPM 53 194 30 800 30 50017
-Comparisons between observed and calculated extent of
cavi-tation are shown in Fig. 5.1 where the extents are indicated
at different angular positions of the propeller blade.
Three typical pressure distributions - one from each of the
three loading cases - are given in Fig. 5.2.
As observed, the pressure on the suction side is below the
cavitation pressure near the leading edge - which corresponds
with the observations. In addition, for the conditions shown
on Fig. 5.2 the safety against cavitation is small also
further back on the chords, and hence cavitation may well
occur on a larger part of the section than the narrow suction
18
-6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
The fuliscale ducted propeller cavitation observations as
well as measurements of noise levels near the stern, hull
surface pressure and hull vibration levels on M/T "THORSAGA"
successfully provided much useful information on the
pheno-mena of ducted propeller cavitation and duct erosion, and
further has revealed the effect of the air injection system
on the duct erosion prevention and hull vibrations.
The main conclusions of these full-scale experiments as well
as the correlation studies between the theoretical prediction
and fuliscale ducted propeller cavitation observations are
mentioned in the following:
The air injection system is effective for preventing
duct erosion. This was assumed from the reduction of
high frequency noise components measured near the duct
and have later been confirmed by inspection of the
ducted propeller of M/T "THORSAGA" after two year's voyage
with the air injection system.
The noise measurements indicated that the significant
part of effect of air was generally attained by the
air flow of approximately 5 m3/min.
Local and superstructure vibration levels particularly
of low frequençies generally tend to increase with the
increase of amount of air but not to any level causing
vibrational trouble by the amount of air required for
19
-The high speed movies revealed how the development and
collapse of cavitation on the blade in the upper
star-board side proceeded.
The angular positions where the blade cavities rapidly
collapse corresponds to the regions on the duct where
plate damages occured.
The injected air appeared to form a layer protecting some
part of the duct inner plate. The injected air bubbles
partly mixed with the cavities in the blade tip region,
and at least a visible thickening of the tip vortex
occured indicating that the injected air was sucked into
the vortex.
From the stereophotos the thickness distribution of
propeller cavitation was obtained.
The influence of propeller RPM and SHP on maximum
thick-ness of sheet of cavities is large, and thickthick-ness of
travelling/tip vortex cavities is noticed somewhat
larger when air is injected.
Extent of cavitation on the propeller blade was
theoretically predicted by the vortex theory, and
the correlation of this result with the fuliscaic
observations was satisfactory.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to express sincere thanks for Mr. B. Svenning
20
-crew for their kind understanding and fine cooperation in
conducting the tests, onboard M/T '1TIIORSAGA".
This project was sponsored by Mitsui Engineering &
Ship-building Company and the Norwegian Cavitation Committee and
the authors are grateful for their permission to publish
this paper.
The authors are grateful to NSFI for the valueable advices
and fine cooperation in early model test stage and to the
Institute for Geodesy and Photograinmetry, University of
21
-REF ERENC ES
NARITA, H.,KUNITAKE, Y. and YAGI, H.: "Application and Development of a Large
Ducted Propeller for the 280,000 dwt
TankerM/T'THORSAGA' ," Trarìs.SNAME Vol.82(1974)
ANDERSEN, O., TANI, M.:
"Experience withT/T'GOLAR NICHU'",
Symposium on Ducted. Propellers, RINA (1973)
NARITA, H., KUNITAKE,Y. and YAGI, H:
"Correlation Results of Model and Full Scale Ducted Propeller Cavitation Observations", Symposium on High Powered Propulsions of
Large Ships", NSMB (1974)
4 NARITA, H., KUNITAKE,Y, YAGI, H., OOSTERVELD,M.W.C., and HOEKSTRA,M.:
"Model and Full Scale Ducted Propeller Cavitation Observations on a 280,000 DWT
Tanker", Jour. Soc.Nav.Arch.of Japan, Vol. 136 (1974)
OKAMOTO,H., OKADA, K., SAlTO, Y.
and TAKAHEI,T.:"Cavitation Study of Ducted Propeller on Large Ships", Trans.SNAME Vol. 83 (1975)
HUSE, E:.:
"Air Injection to avoid Cavitation Erosion in
Propeller Duct", The Ship Research Inst.of Norway, Report No. R-49 Sept. 1975
50 s 20
10
did
36'/44'
F ARPM
105
3/
Inj.air
O Nm/mmFig. 2.1
36/ 44'
85
O Nm3/mjndF/dA
RPM
tni. air
60 ç,e 60 40
d I d
42.'/ 50'
F ARPM
= 105
3Inj. air
ONm/mirt
$ g
d Id
F A2/50
RPM
=105
Ij.I r
10 Nm/mm(D ('J
u-g
-G u) Q IL50
s50
o40
e 4030
d/d
= F ARPM =
lnj.uir
s30
d /d
71'/71
F ARPM: 105
3nj air: 10
Nm,'mninFig. 2.9
Fig. 2.10
3 lnj. air
O Nm/mm
d/dF711/ 71
RPM
B5
Fig. 2.fl
i
: 20°
3 lnj. cur 5Nm/ min
(1/d
71 / 71 A F R PM85
Fig. 2.12
L Z 6 i d OL V1d J J V
1tLI1tL
Pl
P o J!01U1 o3 -cm - 10 3-o - Io r/R 1.00 r IR 0.98 cm 32 15 nR 0.96 nR 0.95 n/R 0.94
Fg 214
35 cm 20d/d
71'/ 71' RPM 105 p 20 Inj. air OVelocity transducer1 -hydrophon ( pressure transducers -4
/\
H
6 chan. amplifier! i n te gr a to r>
Charge amplifier 2 chan. trans-ducer amplifier.L-1 J
--4 -I Strain Te1inetry gaugotansmiter
Telemetry
receiver/
discrimina-tor¿
i
FIG. 3.1 Ins rumenta tap recordi-'®CEC CEC CECt
L
®CEC -PRESSURE TRANSO. - STARBOARD - PORT ® CE CI1
STRAIN GAUG E S çPositions of Velocity (CEC) - and Pressure Transducers
in the centreline on the top of the wheel house horizontal vibrations
in the ceritreline at the aft end of the main deck
vertical vibrations
near to the centr.line at the upper support of the.duct vertical vibrations
near to the centreline above the stern tube bearing horizontal vibrations on the engine
near to the centreline in the steering gear flat pressure transducer starboard
pressure transducer port
--
CECVELOCITY T R A N SOU CE R
10
-/.N
5 10 N m3/ min o I 0 5 0 Nm3 Im i n15
-mm/s lo 50i
,4 m3 / min 2 mm/s©
kp/rn 7 ool 600Jo
20 15 400.lo I
300-1 200 0 1001 o4 5 1x BLADE FREQUENCY
,2 x
o3x
's o I, X o o 10 Nm 1mm 2 k p/rn200-
180- 120e 80o'
o o 5 tim3 / mintoni ®
i o 8 8 4 o o15
-rvn /5d Id
36'/ 44'
mm/s F ARPM
1O5 15 lo 5xx
xX
3 I n04
I o 5 10 Nm3/ mind
d2'/5O'
.
ix BLADE FREO.UENCY
X2*
'1RPM1O5
3*
ii 04*
'1outt
15 mm/s mrrvs 30 -2 k fm 600500.
400 300 200 100 0©
25 -20 -1510i
o 0 5 6*o
2 kp/m 200 160 120 o o- -9
5 3 5x Nm ¡min -wÇ3 10 mm's 10 5 o 0 10 Q 15 Mm 1mm 15-o,
20- 16- 12-O oO
15 055
10 16 Nm/mm Mm/minFç. 3.4
2510
20 -15 -o X.
3 Mm/min o X .0-o s 10 3 15 NmI mintøb(®
o 36.1 32 2cXX XÌ
L 'C 24-mm / s 20 15 lo o k p/rn2 C2) 4 00
.
s 300/0
100 15 -rn misdF/dA71'/71'
ix BLADE FREQENCY
RPM=105
X 2 X o 3 x fl 4 x -.©
0 5 10 15 3 Nm 1mm 15 mm / £ lo5-.
o 2 k P/rn 160- 120 - 80 404 o/
X I J 5 10 15 3 Nm /mn 15 2 kp/m mm/s s o a c Air outlet XxI
20©
10 ////10 El p J o 10 15 0 5 10 15 3 3 Nm /mÌn Nm ¡min-0
500400-
300/
o-.
200-00
100 o o D I I O 0 5 10 15 5 5x Sxx3.
Nm /mm 3 Mm /mill03
5 10 153.
Nm /mm o to n©
o 5 10 o 5Octave band anaLyses, BALLA ST
H-12/3-75.
MANHOLE TO
LOWER AFT PEAK TANK
UPPER AFT PEAK
TANK i
110 2ì
loo:
1*
90I
902 3so7
8 4 57081111
7 706o'
50°1I
9 40,iï
60 40 o ic30
AI
30 20 2OAIR FLOW RATES
Draughts
Aft
44'
, Fore36'
105RPM
,17,5 knots
, 31,200 S.H.PENGINE
WORK SHOP
0 3 5 7,5 10 m7 û 5
7,5 10
315Hz 85
95 db go22Hz 85
28Hz 85
110 db 10536HZ !°°
100 db 95 38Hz 90 110i05\t
100 45Hz 95BALL A ST
¡Draughts
:At t: 44'
, Fore:
36 '
11-12/3-75
54Hz 100 115db/\
66Hz 11088H0/\.
ioo'\
105 HzQ 115 db 110 105 115 Hz loo 110 db 200Hz105ioo,/
290 Hz95 360 Hz90 db525 Hzco
300-95 db go 500 Hz85 95 db500
1200 Hz 85 BO db 1 8 KHz7S 80 db6 KH275
So db6-9,5 KHzo
Microphone Signalfrom lower aft peak tank.
Nor row band analysis e-. P.gk values k- Average values ii, a band C orn ponen t
fruencis
are approximate.
0-35-75-10
Fig. 4.2
loo
db 95 9030 dB
20
10-lo
30 dB 20 10'-lo
30i
r
r
20
11-12/75, BALLAST,
85 R PM Draughts : Aft :44',3Fore:36'
Ai r fLow rates :
O and 10 Ymin
Level, reduction recorded in hydrophone signal..
Fig. 4.3
95RPM Draughts:Aft:44',Fore:36'
Air tow
r ates: O and IO
njnLevel. difference recorded in hydrophone signai
105RPM Draughts: Aft :44, Fore; 36
Air flowe rates: O and io
L ev eL
diff e r ence recorded
in hydrophone signal.
50 100 200 500 1K
Higher frequencies: Signal too weak to be recorded
Higher frequencies: Signal too weak
to be recorded
Higher frequencies:
Signal too weak to be recorded. A
2k
5K 10)< 15K Level reductior (improvementwith injection
of air. Level reduction with injection of air. lrnproveme n t with injection ofair.
Fig. 4.3
10 0 10 2 O 10 o 1 O 20 Fig. l.A 13-14/3-75
85RPM
Air flow
Level difference
rates
Oraught:71'
:0 and
recorded
Im/
even
Ikeel.
in hydrophone signal.
13-14/3-75
105RPM
Air flow
LeveLrates
difference
Draught:71'
Oeven
and 1Orì
observed
keel.
Iin hydrophone
signal
.t
&
15 20 50 loo 200 500 1K 2K 5k 10K 15K k .30dB
20 30dB
20
I mprove mentwith ar injection
rnro vernerftwith air injetiorì
40
40 e o 40 o30
'A
20°
d Id
36'144'
F ARPM
105
d /d
71'/ 71'
F ARPM = 105
Catcututed
extent
of
cavitation
Fig. 5.1
30 o 20dF/dA: 36'/44
RPM
85
o 50cPcQv. k