7 MEi 1980
ARCHIEF
EXPER1NENTAL RESEARCH ON TUE CAVITATION PERFORNANCE
OF DUC TED PROPELLER SERIES
By
Y. P.
Yeh dY. 4.
Cheng
China ShÏp Scientific Re9enrch Center
Wuih, Kiansu Provìncc
The People's Repub1c of China
1978
Lab.
y. Scheepsbouwkunde
Technische Hogeschool
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE CAViTATION PERFORMANCE OF DUCTED PROPELLER SERIES
By YP
Yeh and Y. M. ChengI INTRODUCTION
The najority
of stern vibratIon, propeller erosionendncise symptom
mro or less related with cevitational phenomena of
propellers.
3g-nificant progress has been made recently in the
prediction of the type
and extent of cvitat1on
on the blades of conventional
propellers
throu,h-out the efforts of
many institutions such
as SSPA, NSMB, NSRDC,
eta.
With regard to ducted propellers, since RINA
Symposium on Ducted Propellers
(1973), many valuable
reports have been published,,
such as NSMB's
investi-gation of the interaction between
ducteJ propeller and the hull In depres-surlzed tank I1
¿anese contributions
on' the observation of
cavitatlonal
phenomena of prototype ships
and on the prevention of
duct-erosion by mecns of air injection system [,3, ¿,5
We have learnt that SSPA has done systematic testa of ducted propellers in cavitation tunnel CJ
,
al-though we have not yet seen their report. As a first step in the
research
prograne of ducted propellers, test of 'I-seres" in uniform velocity
field
vere conducted in our
cavitational tunnel, k:brief sumsary of
the
test results is given In this
paper.
Il Experiments In Cavitational Tunnel
Altogether twenty variations of ducted propellers,
two different
nom-zles in combinatIon with ten D series propellers were tested in the SSIiRJ cavitational tunnel in the year 1976. The test oction' of the tunnel was 600 x 600 rn- The diameter of model propellers vea D240 mm. The range of Reynolds number was 0.63 z lO Rn .
3.72
10 .The air
con-tent as measured by means of Van Slijke's
method was found to b%5= 0.2
---0.5, and was controlled by experience through variation' of deaeratIon period according to vIsual observation. Through observation of cavlta-tional. phenomena cf varIous tests, it was 3hOWfl that the D-serles prope1-1ers wuich were marked vi th the adoption of linear pItch variation matching the velocity disttlbutlon Inside aecelcrating ducta, effectIvely avoided face tip cavItation in the designed working range. SIncenoniIn-ear distribution of maxImum blade thickness was adopted, following that of Kaeeries of NSMB, bubble cavitatIor near the middle portion
f
chordscarcely occurred. When the cavitation number decreased down to super-cavitating condition of operation, the flow blockage increased, causIng
separation of flow on the outer surface at the leading edge of nozlo. At lover cavitatIon number (e.g. 6= 1.7) and
ifl
the range of low advanceratio, the boundary layer separated anJ :atered bubble cavitation
deve-loped, whilst in the open water tests such kind of flow separation occu red oniy In the regIon of high advance ratio.
III Regression Analysis and Wall-Effect Correction
In order
to process the experimental data of ductedpropeller series
tested in cavitation tunrel, a methd for the rgre33ion analysis
'.a3
de-visod ani cmputing programme forCJ-719 type
computer was composed. Examples of computed results are shown in Figs 1 and 2.With the open
water
test data as basis, wall effect was corrected in a method somewhat similar to the Kr -Identity method used by Van Lam-meren et. al. in handling the test results of B-series propellers (7).The Cr -.±.dentity method was employed as a new attempt to tackle the
pro-blem of water speed corrections. From th. identity of the propeller
thruat loading coefficients ('TP
in both ewapheric and open
water tests,
the ratio K=f/ and hence
the
reiationsp
!KJCCrp) nere obtainedThen the thrust coefficient curvo
influenced by cavitation was correctedwIth this factor, the cavitation number was
corrected accordir.g to
Bur-nil's suggestion E3 . The open-water thrust coefficient curve ofnoz-zle and the torque coeffIcient curve of propeller vere used instead of those of the atrospheric condition in the cavitation tunnel.
For a given cavitation number and advace coefficIent J
, let
Krp / KTDt , be the uncorrected
cavitatio7i-Influeflced
moa-cured values of propeller thrust coefficient, nozzle thrust coefficient, and propeller torons coefficient
repectiveiy
At the point J=i , the
corresponding values not influenced by cavitation are K,KÇt and res-pectively. After correction, the cavitation number and advance
coeffi-cient vili bG-0 and J
. Coefficients influenced by cavitation willbe
,Aand
K. (subscript t
indicates theuncorrected measured
valuo from tunnel tests,
oindicates the corrected vaue. Symbol
indicates value not influenced by
cavitatIon). The correction to the cavItation Influenced propeller thrustcoeffIcient
rp- Is done by uti-lizing the relatlonahip be'tween the water speed correction coefficiefltK
and the propeller thrust coefficient
F from to findJ0 and to calculate 6 From the relationshIp to obtain
K6)The correction to the
cavitation influenced nozzle thrust ooeffIoient in done by assuming that the ratio of thrust ratio
remain con3tant before and after
correct1on, i.e.
p(' J_J_
t'(S)
The correction to the cavItatIon influenced torque coefficient k. is done by assuming that the ratio uf efficiencIes remain constant be-fore and aster correction, i.e.
'
(J-)
(Jo)
By means of the nbov& mentioned method, calculations have been made for four of the seriase in addition, two of the above four
series
have been calculated by p - identity method as well. lt was found that theCrp -
Identity method seems to be more neceptable for us than the Krp-
identity method.
A comparison of the results as calculated by both
methods is shown in Table I. Comparing these two methods, it is concluded that the inceptio of the tip vortex and the limit for onset of thrust breaFdown are nearly identical (as shown In Fig. 3), but for propeller with large dIsc area ratio, there in a dIstinct difference In performance characteristic curves
IV. Inception of Tip Cavitation
From the analysis of the results of systematic tests, the following conclusions may be drawn:
1. For a given cavitation number defined by
the
speed of advence( ) , there in an optimum pItch ratio for ducted propeller
cor-respodig to the greatest value of C1 the total
thrust coôfficiet
at the onset of tip vortex, as shown in Fig.3.
This characteristic is somewhat different from that of conventional propeller. For a givencavitation number, the ml1er the pitcI- ratio of a conventional propel-1er, the greater the marginal thrust CT
at the onset of tip
vortex. The inception curve of back cav'ation oÍ NSÎ'IB B-er±es propel-1er at r/R 1.0 is reproduced in Fige
If the induced velocity of propal1e d duct be neg1ectd, and the resultant velocity at 0.7 fl of propeller is used to define the
cnvita-tion nixner G ther all of the P/B curves are in reilar order. For
propellers hav.ing the saiie /JJ,, (5 io proporticnal o (-Tr ,
3-cn-the value of slope incroses with the irl3roase
i?ì i/.
i'O' iOuic2i
,.
the
¿rator the P/B value, the greater 6 physically the earlierwill be the onset of tip vertex. or identical , the greater the P/B value, the smaller he marginal CT , as shown in Fig. 5.
- is proporionai to (P/B - where
0, as shown in
Pig. 6.. With it is possible oy follo1ug the methods of C9) [lo]
to predict the shio speed at which the tip vortex of ducted propeller begins to shed,
V Thrust Breakdown
Since it seems there is no unIversally
agreed sharp definton for
the inception point of the second stage cav1tat1o, it may be artificIally prescribed. With regard to the ducted propellers owing to the fact that the influences of cavitation upon thrust breakdom of propeller, of nozzle and upon torque breakdowa are nearly but not exactly equal, the onsetpoints of thrust breakdown and torque breakdown will not, in general, occur
at the sane instant. It is tentatvoiy suggested thet when the total thrust
of duct and propeller just commence to fall, the corresponding condition vili be defined es the onset of the second stage cavitation. The test results of propellers with different P/D and i- were faired by reans of regression
analysis.
Then by plotting a series cf different poInts of thrust breakdown corresponding todifferent
cavitation numbers(say,
h 85, 90, 95, 98 and99.5%,
h - the ratioof cavitation-thfluencad thrust
to non-Influenced thrust), the onset point of total thrust breakdown cor-responding to h 100% may be obtained by extrapolation,The following remarks may be drawn from calculation:
The onset of second stage cavitatIon as
determined
by the regression analysis, when considered together with the visual observation through cavitation tests, corresponds to a cavitation extent of about 1/7 of theback area of the blade, whereas for open propellers, this extent would be
about 1/6 normally at
the onset of thrust breakdown
This fact
Indicates
that the thrust breakdown will
occur earlier
for ducted propeller thanfor open propeller.
SImilar to the inception of tip
vortez of thefirst stage, for a given
cavitation number defined by the speed Of advance, there Is an optimum pitch ratio at which the marginal breakdown thrust coïfIcient is the largest, as shown in Fig. 7 Generally speaking, the optimum pitch ratiofor inception of the first and the
second stage cavitationare not the
same
If the induced velocities ara neglected and
the cavitatioa number
6c corresponding to the onset ofthrust breakdown is
defined by theresul-tant velocity at o.7 R of propeller, then the P/B
curves
o the CTTdiagram are in regular order, similar to the
G-CTr
curves.
For
propel-1ers of the same P/B values, is nearly in proportIon with C, i.e.
çç< 3-C'1 The valueS of parameter increase as P/B Increases. For the same cTT
,
the greater the P/B
value, the greater 6, the earlier
onset of thrust breakdoww.
For the sane 6.&, the greater
the P/B vo]-ues,
the smaller the marginal Gr , as :awn in FIg. o.
In thQ pepioçl of development o
-avitation on the ducted propeller,.
the mutuai
reiatonShiP
propeller torquo are quite noticeable in the following respects:'
With the development of tip vortex,, duct thruzt will break downearlier than that of propeller normally. Except for small pItch ratio
ducted propeller with low cavitation number, in which casepropeller
thrust will break down first.The
dlfferenca between the speed of advance at whichtorque breakdown and that corresponding to thrust breakdown Is smaller than the differenee between the speed of advance at which nozzle thrust breakdown and that corresponding to propeller thrust breakdown. In' other words, wIth the
development in
cavitation, the breakdown of propeller torque and thrusttake place nearly simultaneously.
But strictly speakIng,
at high
cavi-tation
number, with propeller of small pitch rctio, torque breakdown will take place after propeller thrust breakdom.
When cavitation
num-ber decreases, the differences 15 the speed of advance between both breakdowns become
smaller. At low cavitation
number, torque breakdown
vili take 1ace.cavlier than propeller
thrust breakdown'.
e. WIth further development
In cavltation, the nozzle thrust will drop
off more rapidly than
that ofpropeller.
When cavitation number decreases, there is a tendency for the thrust ratio to
increase rapidly,
as shown in Figs. 9and 10.VI Trade Off DesIgn Charts
In order to facilitate the design of ducted propeller
system, the
curves of onset ei fIrst and second stage cavtntion aregiven on the or-dinary - or ---I)
desI
chart. The left hand side of
the
curves i the safety region and the right hand side ig the
cavitation
o thrust breakdown i'eg'.on,
see Fig. 11 [11J
.
VII
References
I) M.W.O. Oostervcld,
W Van den Berg: "Research
ifl
a Deoressurized Tow-ing Tank on Ducted Propeller
- Hull InteractIon" ISP,Vol. 23,
No.263, 1976. 2] Okamoto, H., Okada, K., Salto, Y. and Masai,
K.: Fuil Scale Cavita-tion ObservaCavita-tion on Tankers Fitted With Dacted Propellers" NSI4B Symposium
on High Powered Propulsion of
Largo Ships, Dec. 1974.
51 Okamoto, H., O}ada K., Salto,
Y. and Takahel, T: "Cavitation Study of' Ducted Propellers on Large Ships" SNAME, Nov.. 1975.,
4) Narita, H. Kunitake, Y. and Yagi, H:'Correla'in
aesults of Model and Full Scale Punted Propeller
Cavitation Observations" NSNB Symposium on High Powered Propulsion
of Large Ships,
Deco 1974.
[Si Narita, H. Kunitake, Y, mgi, H :"ADplication' and Development of' Large Dueted Propeller for the 280,000 dt Tanker M.S.
Thorsaga". SNAKE, Nov. 1974.
1 Hans Edatrand: "The Cavitation Laboratory of the Swedish State
Ship-building Experimental Tank" Circu1ir f rn Statena Skoppsprovningsanatalt Gbrterborg juni,, 1974, Nr. 32.
[7] W.P.A. Van Laminaran, J.D. Van Manen and M.W.C. Oosterved:
"The Wageningen B-Screw Series" SNAHE, 1969.
181L.C.
Burrill: "Seventh International Conference onShip Hydrodynamics"
Stockholm, 1954,
J N. Chandrashekkara: "Analysis
of Tip Vortex
Cavitation Inception at Hydrofoils and Propellers"
Schiffstechnik, Band 23,
(10)
i.Noordzij: "
Noto on th So1in
of
Tir Vortx Cavitation
Totion" IS. V,,l.24, 1\ro.227, S,t,. 197.
(1 î). L.. iiurril,
-... ELrson:"Prcplier Catiori. Furt
r Tsts
on lo
nch..s o"
lIer
ocels in
- 'Jole
Oit'..4-on
Tunn1".
Vol.79,
7art
6, 1963.
*TììjS
article is an airidd vrsicr c'
a roport 'ith th-
saris
titis.
I
-3--Ur.correctcdS-=4.50 Corrected with KTp-dentity method Correctcd rith CT-1dentiy method
J K TDt 10}CQ o TP. KTD0 J4Q KTP KTD 10 0.43 0.216 0.0509 0.374 14.6 0.256 0.216 O.10;0 0.396 5.28 0.403 0.189 0.0680 0.355 0.47 0.221 0.0526 0.357 12.2 0.303 0.221 0.1100 0.411 5.30 0.440 0.193 0.0608 0.368 0,51 0.213 0.0503 0.379 10.1 0.360 0.213 0,1000 0.404 I 5.30 0.477 0.186 0.0648 0.362 0.55 0.203 0.0446 0.369 8.62 0.416 0.203 0.0959 O.33 5.29 0.515 0.177 0.0572 0.353 0.59 0.188 0.0357 0.344 7.54 0;474 0.100 0.0600 0,366 5.25 0,554 0.165 0.0465 0.33
K
o. o. 0.1o.'
0.0 0.0 o 0.05 'JF.1.
BD/2 D-7O1Q
A(TD, T/? - J Cíc.rves o f8D!2 t. ) ' -70
IUI
1K
IL.
Kr..
."1"
u
__¡if.
__u...
u...
R
.r1.
u
I
id
4
IP
___.
il
r
-...- 20'4
Lj_'
i
4 4i
I
I
fç
oc (117z
0.6 0.5 o-4 0.3 0.2o.'
. R
:iiupp.-1
-.
AVAV
10i::7..L
Lio
IL
UWVANUP
o F 05 0.6 0.7 0.8 oFi2.
BD12 -i- D 4 -70/O
f0i(,
7
-f (rveS
of 3Df2#D7o/o
10 K 0.4
o..
.L7ceptioi (ure of
Tip Vortex ofF'q 3.
BD/2+ b4'-/QO
2,-t-rr
r
\\\\V\
.\\\\
\\
\\\
\\\
\\
\\\\
\ N'\
\\\
N
?.4\
\\
\\\3.3
2)
H
/1/
¡
/1
')
1/1/
" IUi
/ J!
I
I
/1 /
Cor Cr i- - -
crrc ted w;Á Kr/
//
/
/
/
4I//Il
/1/
1,6 1.4 1.2
lo
0.0f iiccptiori
C«ry
of ßç
(=i.) of
84100
u. a' CTj
'24
8 3 ío 0.1 02 0. 04 05Q. o. o,?
o
t'o
1._çCrí
Inception Grve
of
13AVôrtey 6
.crrof
P1g. 5-.
¡3tv2
1) ?'-AI
2
A
-o.8
y
O
y
e
o6
0.6
V
0,2
020
Incepon Carve of Tip Vrtex 6, (--J.t°t
.
l2D4-!OO
-= .4
I
p A Al'o +
Ay
t-'0.8.
"D
Crye of Second Stcje C4vitaiopi af
7.
L D /2 +
o.' O4 0.2 o 05
r;q.
8
1.Jncep?oii
Cu-v&3Ò/2#D4t -(00
25Cri
i 4
L]D
I
D
A
t C'+
-y
of
of
f. j
/0
o.gQ]
'-c-:r
Crve
of
F;y.
9'
aJ,r,4&/ofo
o7f
j-4.ç
63O
a4j
047 a' S/ 055 o,