• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Identified Flying Object – IFO

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Identified Flying Object – IFO"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Gábor Dobos Owner and Managing Director

Chemotronik Kft. Május 1. út 2. 3078 Bátonyterenye Hungary dg@ifo-energy-unlimited.com www.ifo-energy-unlimited.com www.chemotronik.hu

Identified Flying Object – IFO: an Untethered Airborne Wind Energy System

Gábor Dobos Chemotronik Kft. The characteristic feature of our AWE-system concept is

the use of un-tethered flying devices [1]. Today, the ”flag-ships” of this emerging industry choose to use tethered ones. This fact may have several causes, among others the doubts regarding the technical feasibility as well as the theoretical background of this technology [2]. The presentation begins with the theoretical principles of IFO-gliders and their demonstration with a simple time-domain simulation as well as some existing ”proofs of concept”. The most critical problem of the idea is that har-vested energy has to be stored temporarily on-board the IFO. The presentation discusses some of the possibilities. IFOs apply a special technique of flight called Dynamic Soaring. This way the flying device can capitalise on the energy of wind shears by increasing its own airspeed to several times that of the gradient. Since winds do not stay in place, the flying devices need to follow them. Tethered devices obviously cannot do so. Their untethered com-petitors (e.g.: IFOs, guided by their LIDAR) are free to rise into and travel with winds that would maximise the con-tinuous yield from an energy extraction aircraft. Most tethered devices work today near the upper end of the planetary boundary layer, that is: at about 500 m alti-tude. Summarising wind power data that are

characteris-tic for the parcharacteris-ticular device and altitude (see figure), one can state that the tethered and conventional types have insurmountable handicaps compared to the IFO. Characteristic wind power data of wind power plants [3]

Type Heigth (m) Wind Speed (m/s) Wind Power Density (W/m2) Conventional 100 4 38 Tethered 735 7.3 224 Un-tethered IFO 10000 140∗ 411000

Airspeed of the IFO

These first results show that un-tethered flying energy harvesting devices deserve more attention in the future than they had until now.

References:

[1] Dobos G.: Un-tethered autonomous flying wind power plant. PCT patent application WO2010106382A3, Hungarian patent: HU000227468B1

[2] Harrop P.: Biomimetic aircraft snatch power aloft. Energy Har-vesting Journal. 31 October 2012.

http://www.energyharvestingjournal.com/articles/4862/ biomimetic-aircraft-snatch-power-aloft

[3] Archer C. L.: An Introduction to Meteorology for Airborne Wind Energy. In: Airborne Wind Energy. Springer (2013)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

[r]

[r]

T raktor i¡gnie za zepion¡ na linie gªadk¡ pªyt kamienn¡ o masie m po poziomej powierz hni na od inku drogi s3. Po przeby iu poziomego od inka drogi s=15

In this note we are going to consider a queueing system which con ­ sists of n serves heaving a bounded number — m of waiting places, and also a system with an

18 Kite attitude rate time history during simulation with changes in wind speed, showing estimated and truth... 19 Average absolute state errors for kite system during

For this reason, the constraint that the net power used by the reel must be less than or equal to zero (i.e., net power can be generated, if that is optimal). 7 shows the

Spostrzeżono mianowicie oddaw na, że przez zrastanie się bliźniacze kryształów zmniejsza się ilość kątów i krawędzi, w y­.. stawionych nazewnątrz; ta k

gólna larw a bardzo je st rospowszechniona i do tego w rozm aitych skupieniach mało ze sobą spokrew nionych, wówczas możemy przyw iązyw ać do niej wielką wagę