• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Reports of Cases Relating to Maritime Law : containing all the decisions of the courts of law and equity in the United Kingdom, and selections from the more important decisions in the colonies and the United States, 1878 Vol. 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Reports of Cases Relating to Maritime Law : containing all the decisions of the courts of law and equity in the United Kingdom, and selections from the more important decisions in the colonies and the United States, 1878 Vol. 3"

Copied!
642
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)
(2)

T H I S P H O T O G R A P H I C R E P R I N T E D I T I O N

IS P U B L I S H E D B Y

D E N N I S & C O ., I N C . (P u b lis h e rs ), B u ffa lo , N . Y „ U . S. A . B U T T E R W O R T H & C O . (P u b lis h e rs ) L T D . , L o n d o n , E n g la n d

R e p r in t e d b y p h o t o lit h o in th e U .S .A . b y C u s h in g -M a llo y , In c ., o f A n n A r b o r , M ic h ig a n

(3)

R E P O R T S

OF CASES R E L A T IN G TO

M A R I T I M E L A W ;

C O N T A IN IN G A L L T H E

DECISIONS OF THE COURTS OF LAW AND EQUITY

mratÊÏr ïîmgDtmt,

AND SELECTIONS FROM THE MORE IMPORTANT DECISIONS

Colottùs anïr tjjc ®nittîJ States.

E D IT E D B y

J -A. AL Eg, E . .A. 8 E I ÎST A. L E, Barrister-at-Eaw.

V O L . I I I . ,

N e w S e rie s , fr o m 1 8 7 5 to 1 8 7 8 . (VOL. V I., O.S.)

L O N D O N : H O R A C E C O X , 10, W E L L I N G T O N S T R E E T , S T R A N D , W .C .

1 8 7 8.

(4)

LO N D O N :

P R IN T E D BY H O R A C E COX, W E L L 1 N O T O N -S T R R E T , S T R A N D , W .C .

( M W

^'Vv

- \JL- tA M \ * > - ' £ • -

(5)

INDEX

TO

O I F T I E L I E C A S E S

R E P O R T E D I N T H I S V O L U M E .

Ao a m s„. Ha l l ...page 496

Ad r i a t i c, Th e... ... 16

l is o n V. Th e Br is t o l Ma r i n e In s u r a n c e ^ c o m p a n y ... 178

Ak in s a n d a n o t h e r v. Ju p e, Pe m b r o k e, a-iwe p e n1i;ei m, a n d Ch o is y ... 449

a m s t e l, Th e 488 Am oERSON a n d o t h e r s v. Mo r ic e ... 31, 290 a n e r o id, Th e 418 ^ » « . - In d i a n, Th e... " " " i ; " " ; " ! " ... 1

Ar t ANDALE’ Th e... 38 3 ’ 489> 504 . * UE Av e r a g e As s o c ia t io n, Re (De Win t o n a n d Co. sc a s e) ... .. 245

t r ° D (a p p ) • • c a s e ( r e s p . r : : : : : : : : : : : ... 84

v wALASI4n In s u r a n c e Co m p a n y, Th e (apps.), Au s t r1LMAM r' OWSI,t:T Ja c k s o n (re s p .)... 26

Sa u n d e rN Aq e ic u l t u r a l Co m p a n y, Th e v. n ^ I)A AND Ki r w e e Bo o t y ... 69

v ‘ St a n t o n... . 246, 294 B ^ Ew t^ ’ E x P a r t e ; R e W O R S D E L L ... 387

Ba y t u° K V' ®u e n y e a t, Br o w na n d Co m p a n y... 376

Be iotJ i ND othjsrs v. Ch a d w i c k ... 453, 543 a e l q i c, Th e.... 348

Bl e s s in g, Th e .'... t 6 l B w ss v. Go m e z...; ; ; ... 456

b o w e s wa n dV n co t h e e s ' ¿h a y t o n so3 Bo y n e Th e rHEES v - Sh a n d a n d o t h e r s ... 461

... IS

Br i d g w a t e r, Th e ... ' " ... 506

Ca d iz, Th e Ca r g o ex Sc h i l l e r'..'.'.'.'...226439 Ca r g o « , Wo o s u n g ... t a S i ^ A’ T ^ BA^ E ' - ' = ^ Ca r h Ca-s t l e, Th e ... 607

Ch ia z z a r o, Th e... 170

Cm* OE ? EOOKL™ . Th e ... 230

™ \ 0LotherNsAVI<1ATION Co m p a n y ®- Ba r c l a y a n d Co h e n 374 ¡ ■ Zy TH E S°h t h-Ea s t e b n Ra i l w a y Co m- l 0: r ECIAE St e a m s h ip Co m p a n y v. Bo u l t o n a n da n o t h e r , , , Co r in n a, Th e . ... i n i '-'Be e n v. Wr ig h t ... 2 M c y b e l e^t h e w' Du n n a n d a n o t h e r'::::::::::::::: 595 c y n t h iI , t h e".'.'.':.;:;;:::... 478,

Da io z, Th e... page 477 De Bu s s c h ev. Al t... 584

De Ga k t e ig v. Th e Me r s e y Do c k s a n d Ha r- b o u r Bo a r d ... 500

De l t a, Th e ... 256

Do l p h i n, Th e ... 287

Do o l a n v. Th e Mi d l a n d Ra i l w a y Co m p a n y ... 485

Du d g e o n t>. Pe m b r o k e ... 101, 393 Ea r l o p Eg l i n t o n, Th e v. No r m a n a n d a n o t h e r ... 471

Ea r l Sp e n c e r, Th e ... 4

Ea s t e r n Be l l e, Th e ... 19

Ea s t m a n v. Ha r r y... 117

Ed w a r d s v. Th e Ab e r a y r o n Mu t u a l Sh i p In­ s u r a n c e So c ie t y (Li m i t e d) ... 154

El l is a n d Co. v. Ge n e r a l St e a m Na v i g a t i o n Co m p a n y (Li m i t e d) ... 581

El m o r ea n d a n o t h e r v. Hu n t e r ... 555

Em m a, Th e... 218

En g l is h m a n, Th e ... 506

Ev a n g e l i s t r i a, Th e ... 264

Ev a n sv.Bu l l o c k a n d o t h e r s

...

552

Ex p e r t, Th e... 381

Fa l c o n, Th e... 566

Fi s h e rv. Sm i t h ... 211, 492 Fr a n c o n ia, Th e ... 295, 415, 435 Fr e n c ha n da n o t h e r v. Ge r b e ra n d o t h e r s ... 403

Fr e n c h a n d So n sv. Ne w g r a s sa n d Co m p a n y... 574

Fy e n o o r d, Th e ... 218

Ga b a r r o n a n d a n o t h e r v. Kr e e f t ; Kr e e f t v. Th o m p s o n... 36

Ga m b l e s a a d o t h e r s v. Th e Oc e a n Ma r i n e In s u r a n c e Co m p a n y o f Bo m b a y... 92, 120 Ge n e r a l Bi r c h, Th e... 99

Ge n e r a l St e a m Na v i g a t i o n Co m p a n y v. Lo n­ d o na n d Ed i n b u r g h Sh i p p i n g Co m p a n y... 454

Gi a n n i b a n t a, Th e ... 339

Gl e a n e r, Th e ... 582

Ha n n a, Th e ... 503

He l v e t i a, Th e... 43n Hi c k o x a n d a n o t h e r v. Ad a m s a n d a n o t h e r... 142

Hin g s t o n v. We n d t ... 126

Ho p p e r v. Bu r n e s sa n d o t h e r s... 149

Ho r l o c k, Th e ... 421

Hu t c h in s o n v. Gl o v e r ... 85, 120 In n i s f a i l, Th e... 337

Ja m e s Ar m s t r o n g, Th e... 46

Je n n i e S. Ba k e r, Th e ... 42

Jo h n Bo y n e, Th e ... 341

Jo n e s Br o t h e r s, Th e... 478

Jo n e sv. Ad a m s o na n da n o t h e r ... 253

Ju l i a Fis h e r, Th e ... 380

Ju l i n a, Th e... 264

Ju n o Th e... 217

(6)

IV M AEITIM B LA W CASES,

N A M E S OF CARES.

Ke i t h a n d a n o t h e r v. Bu r r o w s a n d a n o t h e r page 280, 42 7, 481 Kl e i n w o r t a n d o t h e r s v. Th e Cass a Ma r i-

t i m a o f Ge n o a... 358

Ko p t t o f f v. Wil s o n ... 163

La k e Me g a n t ic, Th e ... 382

La k e St. Cl a i r, Th e, v. Th e Un d e r w r i t e r ... 361

Le a s ev. Sc o t t... 352, 469 Le w is v. Gr a y ... 136

Li m e r i c k, Th e ... 206

Lis t e r v. Ya n Ha a n s b e r g e n ... 145

Lo c k h a r tv. Fa l k ... 8

Lo h r e v. At c h in s o n a n d a n o t h e r ... 445

Ld t s c h e r v. Co m p t o ird’Es c o m p t e d e Pa r i s... 209

Ma c k e n z iev. Wh i t w o r t h... 81

Ma r i e Co n s t a n c e, Th e... 505

Ma u d e, Th e ... 338

McMi l l a n a n d So n v. Liv e r p o o l a n d Te x a s St e a m s h ip Co m p a n y (Li m i t e d) a n d C. Gr i m- s h a w a n d C o ... 579

Me d i n a, Th e ... 219, 305 Me i k l e r e i d (app.) v. We s t (resp.) ... 129

Me t c a l f e v. Br i t a n n i a Ir o n w o r k s Co m­ p a n y ... 313, 407 Me y e r a n do t h e r s v. Ra l l i a n d o t h e r s ... 324

Mi nt o, E x p a rte ... 323

Mi r a b i t a v. Th e Im p e r ia l Ot t o m a n Ba n k... 591

Mo o r e v. Ha r r is ... 173

Mo r ic e v. An d e r s o n a n d o t h e r s... 290

Mo r r is v. Le v is o n ... 171

Mo u l d a n d a n o t h e rv. An d r e w s a n d o t h e r s 329 M . Mo x h a m, Th e ... 95, 191 Na t i v e Pe a r l, Th e ... 515

Ni l e, Th e... 11

No r m a, Th e ..., ... 272

N . P. Ne il s e n, Th e ... 169

Nu o e n t v. Sm i t h ... 87, 198 Ogga n d a n o t h e r v. Sh u t e r ... 77

Om o aa n d Cl e l a n d Co a l a n d Ir o n Co m p a n y, Th e, v. Hu n t l e y... 501

Op p e n h e i m v. Fr a s e r... 146

Oq u e n d o, Th e ... 558

Or i g i n a l Ha r t l e p o o l Co l l e r ie s Co m p a n y ( Li m i t e d) v. Gi b b... 411

Pa l m e r v. Za r i f i Br o t h e r s ... 540

Pa r a n a, Th e... 220, 399 Pe a r s o nv. Th e Co m m e r c ia l Un i o n As s u r a n c e Co m p a n y... 275

Pe c k f o r t o n Ca s t l e, Th e... 511, 533 Pe t e r d e r Gr o ss e, Th e... , ... 195

Ph i l o t a x e, Th e ... 512

Po l y m e d e, Th e ... 124

Pr in c e t o n, Th e ... 562

Qu e e ns Av e r a g e As s o c ia t io n, Re; E x p a rte Ly n e s... ... 576

Ra f f a e l l u c c ia, Th e ... 505

Ra n k e n v. Al f a r o ... 309

Rio Gr a n d e d o Su l St e a m s h ip Co m p a n y (Li m i t e d), Re Th e ... 424

Ri v e r We a r Co m m is s io n e r s, Th e v. Ad a m s o n a n d o t h e r s ... page 242, 521 Ro b in s o n v. Pr ic e a n d o t h e r s ... 321, 407 Ro s a r io, Th e ... 334

Ro w e n a, Th e ... 506

St. Ol a f, Th e ... 268, 341 Sa n g u i n e t t iv. Th e Pa c i f i c St e a m Na v ig a t io n Co m p a n y ... 300

Sa r a h, Th e ... 542

Sa r p e d o n, Sp e c ie, ex ... 509

Sa u n d e r s a n da n o t h e r v. Ba r i n g a n da n o t h e r 133 Sc e p t r e, Th e ... 269

Sc h i l l e r, Ca r g o ex ... 226, 439 Sc h u s t e ra n d o t h e r sv. Fl e t c h e r... 577

Sc r u t t o n v. Ch i l d s ... 373

Se c r e t, Th e ... 337

Sf a c t o r ia, Th e ... 271

Sh a n d a n d o t h e r s v. Bo w e sa n d o t h e r s... 20 8, 367 Sh e p h e r da n do t h e r sv. Ko t t g e n a n d o t h e r s 544 Sim p s o n a n do t h e r s v. Th o m p s o n a n d o t h e r s 567 Sis t e r s, Th e... 122, 224 SkIb l a n d e b, Th e... 556

Sm i t h a n d o t h e r s Re ... 259

Sp e c ie ex Sa r p e d o n ... 509

Sp i n d r i f t, Th e ... 42

St a n t o nv. Ric h a r d s o n... 23

St a r o f In d i a, Th e ... 261

St e e l a n d a n o t h e r Th e St a t e Li n e St e a m­ s h ip Co m p a n y... 516

St e e lv. Le s t e ra n d Li l e e ... 537

St o n ea n d o t h e r sv. Oc e a n Ma r i n e. In s u r a n c e Co m p a n y o f Go t h e n b u r g... 152

St o r e y E x p a rte ... 549

St r a t h n a v e r, Th e ... 113

St r i b l e y v. Im p e r ia l Ma r i n e In s u r a n c e Co m­ p a n y ... 134

Sw a l l o w, Th e ... 377

Sw a n s e a Sh i p p i n g Co m p a n y (Li m i t e d) v. Du n­ c a n Fo xa n d Co... 166, 342 Th i i s a n d o t h e r sv. By e r s ... 147

Th o m a s Le a, Th e... 260

Th r i f t v. Yo u l e... 357

Tr a n s i t, Th e ... 233

Tu l l y v. Ho w l i n g... 37

Tu r n b u l l a n d o t h e r s v. Ja n s o n ... 433

T w o Br o t h e r s, t h e ... 99

Un d e r w r i t e r, Th e... 397

Un i o n Ba n k o f Lo n d o n, Th e, v. Le n a n t o n " ! 600 Vi c t o r ia, Th e ... 230

Vir g o, Th e ... ’ 285

Vi v a r, Th e ... 308

Wa t s o n, E x p a r te ; Re Lo v e... 393

We t t e r h o r n, Th e ... 738

Wh i t w o r t h a n d Go., R e ; E x p a rte Bl a c k b u r n ; E x p a rte Gib b sa n d Co... 74

Wi l l i a m s a n d o t h e r s v. Th e No r t h Ch i n a In s u r a n c e Co m p a n y ... 342

Wil s o n a n d a n o t h e r v. Ge n e r a l Sc r e w Co l­ l i e r y Co m p a n y ... 533

Win g a t e, Bi r r e l l, a n d Co., v. Fo s t e r ... 598

Wo o s u n g, Ca r g o ex... 50 239 Ze t a, Th e ... 73

(7)

R E P O R T S

OF

%\\ tire Cases into J s ta in rir b tk Superior Courts

R E L A T IN G TO

M A R I T I M E L A W .

Pm v. Co.] Th e An g l o- In d i a n. TPb.i v. Co.

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL.

Reported by J. P. As p in a l l, Esq., Barrister-at-Law.

° N A P P E A L F R O M T H E H I G H C O UR T OF A D M IR A L T Y OF E N G L A N D .

A p r i l 28 a n d 29, 1875.

( P r e s e n t: T h e E i g h t H o n s . S ir J . W . Co l v i l e, S ir Ba r n e s Pe a c o c k, S ir Mo n t a g u e Sm i t h, S ir P " P . Co l l ie r, a n d S ir H . S. Ke a t i n g.)

Th e An g l o- In d i a n.

C o llis io n — L ig h ts — D u ty to show lig h t a s te rn to T . _ fo llo w in g s h ip .

ls p r im a, fa c ie the d u ty o f a n o v e rta k in g s h ip to keep o u t o f the w a y o f a s h ip ahead o f her, h u t i f the la tte r s h ip sees a n o th e r a p p ro a c h in g her f r o m a d ire c tio n w here h er lig h ts are n o t v is ib le , a n d w h ic h vessel she has reason to suppose does n o t, i n fa c t , w hether keeping a good lo o k -o u t o r n o t, see le r a n d is lik e ly to come in to c o llis io n w it h her, i t is her d u ly to give some w a r n in g to the o v e rta k in g s h ip , n o t n e c e ssarily by e x h ib itin g a lig h t, b u t by some s ig n a l, such as the f i r i n g o f a g u n , the sh o w in g a lig h t, o r o therw ise, w h ic h w i l l in d ic a te h e r w hereabouts to the o v e rta k in g s h ip , a n d c a ll the a tte n tio n o f th a t s h ip to the d a n g e r

° f a c o llis in n fa )

His was a n appeal fr o m th e decree o f th e R ig h t S ir R o b e rt P h illim o r e . K n ig h t , J u d g e o f th e - tt'g h C o u rt o f A d m ir a lt y of E n g la n d , in a cause o t dam age p ro m o te d in t h a t c o u rt b y th e re s p o n ­ d e n ts, th e o w n e rs o f th e b r ig a n tin e E x c e l a n d o f

e c a rg o la d e n o n b o a rd h e r ; a n d a lso b y tb e p e rso n a l re p re s e n ta tiv e s o f h e r la te m a s te r, and o hers o f th e c re w o f th e E xce l, a g a in s t th e b a rq u e n g lo -In d ia n , o f w h ic h th e a p p e lla n ts w ere ow ners, w th e re c o v e ry o f dam ages a r is in g o u t o f a c o lli- S' ° l V M7sWeen ttlB 8a’ d tw o vessels.

,, L he E x c e lw a s a b r ig a n tin e o f 210 to n s re g is te r ,o r aa®re a n ° iit8 . T h e A n g lo - In d ia n w as a b a rq u e o f 440 to n s re g is te r.

c o llis io n h a p pe n e d a b o u t 2.30 a.m . o n th e

^ - p r il 1874, in th e B a y o f B is c a y , a b o u t f if t y

>40li*'k Sy w e s t o f Cape P in is te r re .

., w in d a t th e tim e was b lo w in g a g a le fr o m e n o rth - n o r th -w e s t, a n d th e n ig h t was d a r k a n d Qa y * w it h p a s s in g show ers.

(a) See notes to The E a rl Svecer, post, p. 4.—E n . Vo l. I l i . ; n.S .

T h e case set u p in th e c o u rt b e lo w o n b e h a lf o f th e re s p o n d e n ts , as s ta te d in t h e ir p e titio n , was, t h a t th e E x c e l,w h ils t in th e p ro s e c u tio n o f a v o y a g e fr o m Sw ansea to B a rc e lo n a , was h o v e to o n th e s ta rb o a rd ta c k , u n d e r d o u b le -re e fe d m a in s a il a n d m a in s ta y s a il, h e a d in g a b o u t wesc, a n d fo re re a c h in g a t th e ra te o f b e tw e e n one a n d tw o k n o ts an h o u r, m a k in g co n s id e ra b le lee w a y. T h e r e g u la tio n lig h t s w e re said to be d u ly p la ce d a n d b u r n in g b r ig h t ly a t th e tim e . S h o r tly b e fo re 2.15 a.m . a g re e n l ig h t — w h ic h a fte rw a rd s p ro v e d to be t n a t o t th e A n g lo - In d ia n — was ob se rve d a s te rn o f th e E x c e l, a n d d is ta n t a b o u t 30U y a rd s . T h e A n g lo - I n d ia n , i t was a lle g e d in s te a d o f k e e p in g o u t o t th e w a y o f th e E x c e l, a p p ro a c h e d h e r m a d ir e c tio n w h ic h in v o lv e d r is k o f c o llis io n , a n d e x h ib ite d h e r re d li g h t to th o se o n b o a rd th e E x c e l; a n d , as i t was f u r t h e r a lle e e d , a lth o u g h th e A n g lo - In d ia n was lo u d ly h a ile d fr o m th e E x c e l, a n d a l i g h t was e x h ib ite d o v e r th e s te rn o f th e E x c e l, th e A n g lo - I n d ia n ra n in t o a n d s t r u c k th e E x c e l u p o n th e s te rn , a n d d id h e r s o m u c h d a m a g e t h a t s h e s h o r tly a fte rw a rd s fo u n d e re d a n d was lo s t, to g e th e r w it h h e r c a rg o a n d e v e r y th in g th e n on b o a rd h e r.

U p o n th is occasion th e m a s te r was u n f o r t u n a te ly

d ro w n e d . „ , ,, .

T h e case o n th e p a r t o f th e a p p e lla n ts w as, t h a t o n th e occasion in q u e s tio n th e A n g lo - In d ia n , b o u n d f r o m L o n d o n to Ja m a ica , was clo s e -h a u le d o n th e s ta rb o a rd ta c k u n d e r ree fe d u p p e r to p s a ils , fo re s a il, a n d fo re to p m a s t s ta y s a il, h e a d in g a b o u t w e s t, a n d m a k in g a b o u t fiv e k n o ts an h o u r. H e r p ro p e r r e g u la tio n lig h t s w ere d u ly e x h ib ite d a n d b u r n in g b r i g h t ly , a n d a g o o d lo o k -o u t was b e in g

U n d e r these c iro u m s ta n c e s , a b o u t 2.30 a.m ., on th e 1 4 th A p r il, th e h u ll o f th e E x c e l was m ade o u t a v e ry s h o rt d is ta n c e a h ead a n d a l i t t l e o n th e s ta rb o a rd b o w o f th e A n g lo - In d ia n . T h e h e lm o t th e A n g lo - In d ia n was th e re u p o n im m e d ia te ly p u t h a rd a s ta rb o a rd , b u t i t was im p o s s ib le to a v o id a c o llis io n , a n d th e stem o f th e A n g lo - In d ia n s tr u c k th e E x c e l on th e p o r t side o f h e r s te rn .

T h e re sp o n d e n ts a lle g e d t h a t th e c o llis io n was caused b y th e n e g lig e n c e o f th o se o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - In d ia n , a n d b y reason o f t h e ir n e g le c t to ke e p a p ro p e r lo o k -o u t a n d to k e e p th e A n g lo - I n d ia n o u t o f th e w a y o f th e E x c e l.

T h e a p p e lla n ts d e n ie d th e s ta te m e n ts o t th e re s p o n d e n ts t h a t a l i g h t was e x h ib ite d o v e r th e s te rn o f th e E x c e l a n d t h a t th e A n g lo - In d ia n w as

(8)

2 MARITIM E LAW CASES.

Pn.1V. Co.]

Th e An g lo- In d ia n. h a ile d , a n d a t t r ib u t e d b la m e to th o se on b o a rd th e

E x c e l f o r im p r o p e r ly n e g le c tin g to ke e p a good lo o k -o u t, f o r im p ro p e rly n e g le c tin g to ta k e a n y m easures to sh o w th e p o s itio n o f t b e E x c e l to those o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - In d ia n , a n d f o r im p r o p e r ly n e g le c tin g to ob se rve th e p ro v is io n s o f a rtic le 20 o f th e R e g u la tio n s f o r P r e v e n tin g C o llis io n s a t Sea.

T h e e vid e n ce was ta k e n o r a lly in open c o u rt b e fo re th e le a rn e d ju d g e o f th e c o u rt b e lo w , w h o

■was assisted b y tw o o f th e E ld e r B r e th re n o f th e T r in it y C o rp o ra tio n . T h e le a rn e d ju d g e fo u n d th e A n g lo - I n d ia n alone t o b la m e fo r th e c o llis io n , g iv ­ in g h is reasons as f o llo w s :

S ir R . P h illim o r e .— T h e re is n o q u e s tio n a t a ll as to th e d u ty o f th e A n g lo - In d ia n , t h a t is c le a rly p re s c rib e d b y th e 1 8 th a r t ic l e : “ E v e r y vessel o v e rta k in g a n y o th e r vessel s h a ll ke e p o u t o f th e w a y o f th e said la s t-m e n tio n e d v e s s e l a n d h e r defence f o r n o t k e e p in g o u t o f th e w a y , as I u n ­ d e rs ta n d it , is th a t th e n ig h t was so d a rk t h a t i t was th e d u t y o f th e E x c e l to h a ve s h o w n a lig h t o v e r h e r s te rn , and t h a t i f she h a d done so th e c o llis io n w o u ld n o t have ta k e n place. B u t o n th e e v id e n ce I a m s a tis fie d t h a t th e n ig h t was n o t o f th e c h a ra c te r d e scrib e d b y th e A n g lo - In d ia n w it ­ nesses. I am s a tis fie d t h a t th e E x c e l o u g h t to have been v is ib le to th o se o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - I n d ia n a t th e d is ta n c e th a t she says, v iz ., a t th e d is ta n c e o f a t le a st 300 o r 400 y a rd s , a n d t h a t i f th e re h a d been a p ro p e r lo o k -o u t o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - I n d ia n — and in m y o p in io n and th e o p in io n also o f th e E ld e r B r e th r e n th e re was n o t — she w o u ld h a ve seen th e E x c e l in tim e to h a ve g o t o u t o f h e r w a y, a n d to have crossed h e r s te rn b y s ta r ­ b o a rd in g a t a n e a rlie r p e rio d . T h e q u e s tio n , th e re fo re , does n o t arise, n o r does th e c o u rt in te n d to d iscu ss it , w h e th e r in th e p re s e n t s ta te o f th e s a ilin g r e g u la tio n s i t w o u ld o r w o u ld n o t h a v e been th e d u t y o f rh e E x c e l to h a ve s h o w n a li g h t o v e r h e r s te rn , because I am s a tis fie d , as I have a lre a d y said u p o n th e evidence, t h a t th is vessel o u g h t to have been v is ib le to th o se o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - I n d ia n a t a s u ffic ie n t tim e to h a ve a v o id e d th e c o llis io n , A n d , in d e e d , th e re is a d ile m m a o u t o f w h ic h th e A n g lo - In d ia n , in m y ju d g m e n t, w o u ld fin d i t d if f ic u lt to escape, e ve n i f she h a d n o t been g o in g a t a speed o f a b o u t s ix k n o ts a n h o u r, she b e in g th e o v e rta k in g vessel. She was g o in g a b o u t s ix k n o ts , a n d t h a t ra te o f speed w o u ld o n ly be ju s t if ia b le i f she co u ld h a v e seen a vessel in s u f­

f ic ie n t tim e to g e t o u t o f h e r w a y. I am s a tis ­ fie d u p o n th e e vid e n ce, as 1 have a lre a d y said, th a t i f th e re h a d been a p ro p e r lo o k -o u t th is vessel w o u ld have been seen in due tim e to have p re v e n te d th e c o llis io n , a n d th e re fo re I p ro n o u n c e the A n g lo - I n d ia n alone to b la m e . T he cross a c tio n m u s t be d ism isse d .

F r o m th e decree m ad e in accordance w it h th e above ju d g m e n t th e o w n e rs o f th e A n g lo ln d ia n appealed fo r th e fo llo w in g a m o n g o th e r reasons :

1. Because th e ev id e n c e ta k e n in th e c o u rt b e lo w show s t h a t th e c o llis io n was a ttr ib u ta b le to th e n e g lig e n c e o f th o se on b o a rd th e E xcel.

2. Because th o se on b o a rd th e E x c e l n e g le c te d to k e e p a good lo o k -o u t.

3. Because th o se on b o a rd th e E x c e l n e g le c te d to ta k e a n y m easures to show th e p o s itio n o f th e E x c e l to those o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - In d ia n .

4. Because on th e evidence a d d uce d b y th e re s p o n d e n ts th e m s e lv e s i t is e v id e n t t h a t th o se on b o a rd th e E x c e l c o n s id e re d i t necessary to show a

[ Pb.i v. Co. lig h t over th e stern, and th a t no lig h t was shown in tim e to give those on board th e A n g lo - In d ia n w a rn in g .

5. T h a t th e le a rn e d ju d g e o u g h t to have h e ld th e E x c e l to b la m e fo r n e g le c tin g to show a l i g h t to in d ic a te h e r p o s itio n to th e A n g lo - In d ia n .

6. Because th e c o llis io n was n o t occasioned b y a n y n e g lig e n c e o f th o se o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - I n d ia n .

B u t t , Q .C., a n d R . E . Webster, fo r th e a p p e lla n ts .

— I t was th e d u t y o f th o se o n h o a rd th e E x c e l to h a ve k e p t a b e tte r lo o k -o u t. I t was, f u r t h e r , t h e ir d u t y to have e x h ib ite d a l ig h t o v e r th e s te rn o f th e E x c e l in s u ffic ie n t tim e to h a v e g iv e n w a r n in g to th e A n g lo - In d ia n a n d to have e n a b le d h e r to ke e p o u t o f th e w a y o f th e E xce l. T h is d u t y a rises o u t o f th e g e n e ra l m a r it im e la w , w h ic h re ­ q u ire s a s h ip , b e in g a p p ro a ch e d b y a n o th e r s h ip fr o m su ch a d ir e c tio n th a t th e fo rm e r is n o t as v is ib le as th e la tte r , to e x h ib it a l i g h t o r g iv e a s ig n a l so as to w a rn th e a p p ro a c h in g v e s s e l:

The Ir o n Duke, 4 Notes of Cases, 94,585; 9 Jnr. 476 ; The O sm anli, 7 Notes of Cases, 509.

A n d this d u ty is continued and enforced by th e 20th a rtic le o f the re g ulation s fo r p re v e n tin g col­

lisions, w hich provides th a t “ n o th in g in these ru les shall exonerate any ship o r the owner or m aster, or crew thereof, fro m the consequences o f any neglect to c a r r y lig h ts o r s ig n a ls , o r of a n y neglect to keep a proper look-out, o r o f the neglect o f a n y p re c a u tio n w h ic h m a y be re q u ire d by the o r d in a r y p ra c tic e o f seamen, o r by the s p e c ia l c i r ­ cum stances o f the case.” T h e d u ty to e x h ib it a lig h t being u n d er such circumstances an obligation of th e general m a ritim e law , was a precaution req uired by th e ord in ary p ractice of seamen.”

T h e re is no obligation to carry a fixed lig h t over th e stern, b ut a lig h t should be shown in a proper tim e as a Bignal.

M ilw a r d , Q .C . a n d E . G. C la rk s o n , fo r th e re ­ s p o n d e n ts .— T h e re is no d u t y to e x h ib it a n y l ig h t e x c e p t th o se p ro v id e d b y th e re g u la tio n s . B y a r t ic le 2, i t is e x p re s s ly p ro v id e d t h a t th e lig h ts th e re in p ro v id e d , and “ no o th e rs ,” s h a ll be c a rrie d , a n d to fin d th a t i t was th e d u t y o f a s a ilin g vessel t o c a rr y m o re th a n th e side lig h t s a t n ig h t w o u ld be an o v e r r u lin g o f th e re g u la tio n s . B u t even i f th e re was such a d u ty , i t can o n ly a ris e w h e n th e re is d a n g e r o f c o llis io n , a n d in th e p re s e n t case th e re was n o reason to a p p re h e n d d a n g e r u n t il th e s h ip s w ere close to g e th e r, a n d th e n th e g re e n lig h t was a c tu a lly sh o w n . T hose on b o a rd th e E x c e l k e p t a bad lo o k -o u t.

B u t t , Q.O ., in re p ly .

A p r i l 29, 1875.— T h e ju d g m e n t o f th e c o u rt was d e liv e re d b y

S ir R . P. Co l l i e r.— T h is was a s u it b r o u g h t b y th e o w n e rs o f th e E x c e l, a b r ig a n tin e o f 210 to n s , a g a in s t th e A n g lo - In d ia n , a b a rq u e o f 440 to n s , in consequence o f a c o llis io n , fo r w h ic h th e E x c e l m a in ta in e d t h a t th e A n g lo - I n d ia n alo n e was to b la m e . T h e c o llis io n to o k place in th e B a y o f B is c a y , a b o u t f if t y m ile s o ff Cape F in is te r r e , in th e open sea, a t betw een 2 a n d 3 a m . in A p r i l 1874.

T h e E x c e l was g o in g in a w e s te rly d ir e c tio n , at a b o u t l i o r 2 k n o ts an h o u r. T h e A n g lo - In d ia n was p ro c e e d in g a t a r a te o f so m e w h e re a b o u t 6 k n o ts an h o u r in th e sam e course, b e h in d th e E x c e l. T h e A n g lo - In d ia n ra n in to th e s te rn o f th e E x c e l, a n d th e E x c e l was s u n k . T h e le a rn e d ju d g e o f th e A d m ir a lt y C o u r t has fo u n d t h a t th o A n g lo - I n d ia n was alo n e to blam e.

(9)

P&IV. C o .]

M ARITIM E LAW CASES.

Th e An g lo- In d ia n.

3

[ Pk i v. Co. T h e q u e s tio n in v o lv e d in th is case is c h ie fly one

'h la c t, a n d t h e ir L o rd s h ip s re p e a t w h a t, in d e e d, 'hey have o fte n said, t h a t th e y are e x tre m e ly lo a th t0 ln te rfe re w it h th e U ndine; o f th e c o u r t b e lo w o n ,l q u e s tio n o f fa c t, t h a t c o u rt h a v in g h a d th e a d - y a n ta g o , w h ic h th e y h a v e n o t, o f se e in g a n d h e a r- ln£f *b e w itn e s s e s , u n le ss th e y com e to a v e ry c le a r in c l u s i o n t h a t t h a t f in d in g was w ro n g ,

ti, ° W’ th e fin d in g s o f fa c t o f th e le a rn e d ju d g e are . ®e : F ir s t , w it h re s p e c t to th e s ta te o f th e

® 'g h t, i n re g a r d t o w h ic h th e re was som e con-

■cting evidence, th o se o n b o a rd th e E x c e l re p re ­ s e n tin g t h a t th e n ig h t, th o u g h d a rk , was c le a r, y ^ fh p a s s in g c lo u d s ; th o s e on b o a rd th e A n g lo - n a ia n re p re s e n tin g t h a t i t was d a r k a n d v e ry

° r m y , w it h r a in , o r, a t a ll e v e n ts , o cca sio n al ra in , be le a rn e d ju d g e says : “ B u t o n th e e v id e n ce I atn s a tis fie d t h a t th e n ig h t was n o t o f th e ch a ­ r a c te r d e sc rib e d b y th e A n g lo - In d ia n w itn e sse s. I

^ b . ^ t i s f i c d t h a t th e E x c e l o u g h t to h a v e been js ib le to th o se o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - In d ia n a t th e 'stance t h a t she says, v iz ., a t th e d is ta n c e o f a t t v T i f i ^ -0 r y a rd s .” T h e ir L o rd s h ip s a c c e p t 0 T ', e n d in g , a n d are o f o p in io n th a t i t is b o rn e b y th e e vid e n ce. T h e n th e le a rn e d ju d g e goes ,<r! ant* fin d s a n o th e r m o s t m a te ria l fa c t, n a m e ly , th / f ^ th e re h a d been a p ro p e r lo o k -o u t on b o a rd

■ ? A n g lo - I n d ia n — and in m y o p in io n ,” th e le a r n e d S® says, “ a n d th e o p in io n also o f th e E ld e r re th re n , th e re was n o t— she w o u ld have seen th e j 111 tim o to have g o t o u t o f h e r w a y , a n d to av.e 0 r0 ssed h e r s te rn b y s ta rb o a rd in g a t an e a r lie r fin d ' ’ ^ f i b i r L o rd s h ip s a re o f o p in io n t h a t th is I n 11D^ ^ S° e n t ir e ly s u p p o rte d b y th e evidence, in ■ Ced’ ' n k fi6*1- L o r d s h ip s ’ v ie w , i t m ig h t n o t be c o rre c tly sa id t h a t u p o n th e e vid e n ce th e re w as o o k -o u t a t a ll o n b o a rd th e A n g lo - In d ia n . T h e t L n u Pon th e lo o k -o u t says t h a t w h e n he f ir s t saw

^ e s s e l th e E xcel was “ ahead, a l i t t l e o n th e wh* k ° w t h a t he f ir s t saw h e r m asts ; t h a t

■ill ” Q h ? a. r t'^le m ast s “ she was a t no d is ta n c e a t th o ,ar u “ W h e n I saw th e m asts,” he says, “ o n

< m, s ar.hoard b o w , I w heeled r o u n d a n d s u n g o u t, t o n ' l l 18 a vesse' o n th o s ta rb o a rd b o w ,’ b u t I was snVio a te ’ T e w ere f ° n l o f h e r a lre a d y .” A n d he 1 o,, erl uent>y says, “ I was foul of h er the m om ent w buT 6 r' Norther adds th a t he saw no lig h t hnil; GVer °,n fi°ar<l her, and also th a t he h eard no tho a" *7° fi°ar.fi tle r, which o th er people on board noint 0 l d,'an d id hear. T h is ce rta in ly would who . i 16 b °ncl us'on th a t the man Robinson, on , wa® keeping the look-out, as i t is supposed, i n r.0Ar? *'he -A n g lo -In d ia n , was re a lly keeping no enoo 'tUt T h a t being so, and havin g re fe r- .i hi 0 '‘be 17th a rtic le, w hich provides th a t v e ssel o v e rta k in g a n y o th e r vessel s h a ll v e s s o p 0 t '10 w a y . ° f th e sa id la s t-m e n tio n e d th a t A tb e ir L o rd s h ip s h a ve n o d o u b t w h a te v e r th at t t , 6 ? n d ln « ^h0 le a rn e d ju d g e was r ig h t , t h a t th e A n g lo - In d ia n was to b la m e

genno fl Ue,atl,o u re m a in s , w h e th e r th e re was n e g li- thooo con.t r 'b u t in g to th e a c c id e n t on th e p a r t o f has h n a v i8 a.tin g th e E xce l. O n th is s u b je c t th e re th e m . l " a d 1SuU3s'o n before t h e ir L o rd s h ip s as to fo r Pn n in ? th re e a rtic le s in th e R e g u la tio n s be in rr t1Ven U? " C o llis io n s a t S e a ; th o s e a rtic le s is to ^tb 6 a n d th e 2 0 th . T h e second fo llo w ;,6 e^ eoli f f i a t “ th e lig h t s m e n tio n e d in th e other«, JL ,!j r i'lc e K ’ ” n u m b e r in g th e m , “ a n d n o set tn 8 a 0 arr ie d in a ll w eathers, fr o m s u n -

“ I n r,V K u n rise - A r t ic le 19 is in these t e r m s : ey>Dg a n d c o n s tru in g th e se ru le s , d u e

re g a rd m u s t be h a d to a ll d a n g e rs o f n a v ig a tio n ; a n d d u o re g a rd m u s t also be h a d to a n y sp e cia l c irc u m s ta n c e s w h ic h m a y e x is t in a n y p a r tic u la r case re n d e rin g a d e p a rtu re f r o m th e above ru le s necessary in o rd e r to a v o id im m e d ia te d a n g e r.”

T h e n th e 2 0 th i s : “ N o t h in g in th e se ru le s s h a ll e xo n e ra te a n y s h ip , o r th e o w n e r o r m a s te r, o r c re w th e re o f, fr o m th e consequences o f a n y n e g le c t to c a r r y lig h t s o r s ig n a ls , o r o f a n y n e g le c t to keep a p ro p e r lo o k -o u t, o r o f th e n e g le c t o f a n y p r e ­ c a u tio n w h ic h m a y be re q u ir e d b y th e o r d in a r y p ra c tic e o f seam en, o r b y th e sp e c ia l c ir c u m ­ stances o f th e case.” I t has been a rg u e d o n th e one side t h a t A r t ic le 2 is a b s o lu te ly p r o h ib it o r y to a vessel u n d e r a n y c irc u m s ta n c e s s h o w in g a n y lig h t e x c e p t th e lig h t s p re s c rib e d . O n th e o th e r h a n d i t has been a rg u e d th a t, a lth o u g h u n d o u b t­

e d ly i t w o u ld n o t be p ro p e r f o r a vessel u n d e r th e c irc u m s ta n c e s in w h ic h th e E x c e l w as to ke e p u p a fix e d l i g h t a t h e r s te rn , n e v e rth e le s s , th a t u n d e r th e c irc u m s ta n c e s o f a vessel a p p ro a c h in g h e r w h ic h w o u ld n o t be a ble to see h e r as w e ll as she w o u ld see t h a t vessel, i t was h e r d u t y to have e x ­ h ib ite d a l ig h t in tim e to a v o id th e c o llis io n ; t h a t she m ig h t have done t h is , b u t n e g le c te d to do so.

T h e ir L o rd s h ip s d o n o t e n tir e ly a c c e p t e ith e r o f th e v ie w s w h ic h have been th u s expressed. U n ­ d o u b te d ly i t is p r im d fa c ie th e d u t y o f th e o v e r ­ t a k in g vessel to ke e p o u t o f th e w a y o f th e vessel ahead o f h e r, b u t t h e ir L o rd s h ip s w o u ld be lo a th to la y i t d o w n t h a t n o d u t y w h a te v e r a tta c h e s u n d e r su ch c irc u m s ta n c e s as th e p re s e n t to th e vessel ahead. I f t h a t vessel saw a n o th e r a p p ro a c h ­ in g h e r, w h e th e r k e e p in g a g o o d lo o k -o u t o r n o t, w h ic h she h a d rea so n to suppose d id n o t in fa c t see h e r, a n d was lik e ly to com e in t o c o llis io n w it h h e r, th e y w o u ld be lo a th to say t h a t n o d u t y was ca s t u p o n h e r. O n th e c o n tr a r y , th e y a re o f o p in io n , u n d e r th o se c irc u m s ta n c e s , i t w o u ld be h e r d u t y to g iv e som e w a r n in g to th e a p p ro a c h in g vessel, n o t n e c e s s a rily b y e x h ib it in g a lig h t , b u t b y som e s ig n a l, su ch as th e f i r i n g o f a g u n , th e s h o w in g a lig h t , o r o th e rw is e , w h ic h w o u ld i n d i ­ ca te h e r w h e re a b o u ts to th e a p p ro a c h in g vessel, a n d c a ll th e a tte n tio n o f th a t vessel to th e d a n g e r o f a c o llis io n . T h e q u e s tio n , th e re fo re , com es to th is , w h e th e r in th is case i t has been e s ta b lis h e d t h a t th e E xce l, in th e w o rd s o f A r t ic le 20, d id n e g ­ le c t a n y p re c a u tio n w h ic h m ig h t be r e q u ire d b y th e o r d in a r y p ra c tic e o f seam en, w h e re b y she m ig h t have a v o id e d th e c o llis io n ?

N o w , th o fa c ts w it h re fe re n c e to th is s u b je c t m a y be ta k e n to be th e s e : T h e E xce l saw th e A n g lo - I n d ia n a p p ro a c h in g a t a d is ta n c e o f a b o u t 300 o r 400 y a rd s . T h a t is fo u n d as a fa c t b y th e le a rn e d ju d g e , a n d t h e ir L o rd s h ip s t h in k r ig h t ly . I t a p p e a rs th a t, s im u lta n e o u s ly w it h h e r s ig h t in g t h is vessel she s ig h te d th e g re e n lig h t o f th e vessel, a n d t h a t g re e n li g h t w o u ld th e n in d ic a te t h a t th e re was n o d a n g e r o f c o llis io n ; t h a t th e A n g lo - In d ia n w o u ld pass b e h in d h e r s te rn . Y e r y soon a fte r b o th lig h t s opened, th e re d a n d th e g re e n , a n d th e n u n d o u b te d ly th e re was im m in e n t d a n g e r o f a c o llis io n . T h e e v id e n ce o n th e p a r t o f th e E x c e l is th a t, u n d e r th o se c irc u m s ta n c e s , a fte r a n in e ffe c tu a l a tte m p t to o b ta in th e g lo b e lig h t , th e g re e n li g h t was ta k e n fr o m th e s ta rb o a rd side o f th e ve sse l a n d e x h ib ite d fro m th e s te rn . T h a t fa c t a p p e a rs to be p ro v e d , a n d t h e ir L o rd s h ip s are b y n o m eans s a tis fie d u p o n th e e v id e n ce t h a t t h a t g re e n li g h t was n o t s h o w n in s u ffic ie n t t im e to 1 h a v e e nabled th e o v e rta k in g vessel, i f she h a d

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

ASPINALL’S MARITIME LAW CASES... ASPINALL’S MARITIME LAW

When the master is also pa rt owner of his ship, any act of his which would be barratrous against his innocent co-owners w ill be also barratrous against the

sioned.. They cannot be in a better position than the unde rw rite r who was bound to indem nify the owners against a loss under the policy in th a t case. The owners of

Zanzibar Steamship Company (7 Com.. Ram jiban Serowgee. E ach contract also provided by clause 4 that the vendors should have a lien on the goods fo r paym ent

From this decree the defendant in the C ity of London Court (the appellant in the A dm iralty Court) appealed to her Majesty in Council on the following

The question having arisen in th is form , and the owners having paid the whole of the dock dues while the vessel was being scraped and cleaned, and while simultaneously

Both ships to blame—A dm iralty Court rule.—The Adm iralty Court rule that in cases of collision the damages are to be equally divided where both ships are to blame, does

restored.. MARITIME LAW CASES. This signal, which was general, was apparently not seen by the other vessels. held that the G othland was solely to blame for the